Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - 110600Z OCT 25

OPERATIONAL FOCUS: The Russian Federation (RF) has escalated its deep strike campaign to the operational/strategic level, successfully targeting the Dnipro-Zaporizhzhia-Kryvyi Rih logistical triangle (Wave 3) and achieving confirmed cascading strategic effects (Lviv heating failure). The primary kinetic effort remains the synchronization of this deep strike campaign with the ongoing VDV-led high-intensity ground assault at Siversk. UAF forces must now manage both a critical rear-area CI crisis and persistent front-line attrition.

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Eastern FLOT (Siversk): Confirmed high-intensity ground assault by RF VDV forces is underway. Siversk remains the decisive ground COG. UAF anti-armor effectiveness (110th Mech BDE) is fixing the assault, but attrition rates are likely high.
• Central-Southern Axis (Dnipro/Zaporizhzhia/Kryvyi Rih): This logistical triangle is the new RF strategic objective, successfully targeted by "Wave 3" massed ballistic and cruise missiles. This area is now critically damaged, directly impacting UAF ability to sustain the Eastern FLOT.
• Western Axis (Lviv): Confirmed long-term failure of centralized heating due to previous CI strikes. This converts logistical damage into a strategic civil support crisis ahead of winter.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

The confirmed long-term heating failure in Lviv and the broader power disruptions across the central-southern triangle elevate the strategic urgency of the coming winter season. RF kinetic activity is exploiting the timeframe before severe cold sets in, maximizing civil and military logistical pressure. DSNS guidance on safely restarting household appliances confirms widespread power instability.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF: RF forces are committed to the VDV-led assault at Siversk, supported by effective reconnaissance-strike cycles (e.g., Berestok PVD strike). RF deep strike assets (ballistic, cruise, and KAB) have successfully saturated PPO assets across the central operational zone.
• UAF: UAF ground forces remain committed at Siversk. Rear-area logistical units and PPO assets are severely strained and currently recovering from the massed strike. The immediate control measure is the necessity for logistical rerouting to bypass compromised nodes in the central triangle.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(INTENTION - Strategic Paralysis): RF intentions have matured from interdiction to strategic paralysis. By coupling the Siversk assault with massed strikes achieving long-term effects (Lviv heating), RF intends to force a simultaneous military and civil crisis, compelling UAF to divert resources away from the FLOT.

(CAPABILITIES):

1. Ballistic Missile Saturation: RF demonstrated the capability to deploy 20+ ballistic missiles in a single wave, overwhelming UAF PPO in a targeted operational zone. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
2. Synchronized Multi-Domain Warfare: RF is effectively synchronizing the ground COG (Siversk) with strategic effects (Deep strikes on the central logistical triangle), demonstrating high C2 efficiency at the Operational-Strategic level. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
3. Targeted Reconnaissance-Strike: The confirmed strike on the UAF PVD near Berestok (attributed to 238th BDE) demonstrates effective RF targeting of mobile UAF tactical concentrations near the FLOT.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Shift in Deep Strike COG: The primary deep strike focus has shifted from coastal logistics (Odesa) and northern rail lines to the critical central-southern logistical and industrial triangle (Dnipro/Zaporizhzhia).
• Targeting of Strategic Resilience: Targeting is now explicitly aimed at generating long-term strategic effects (e.g., Lviv heating failure) that affect civilian morale and force UAF resource diversion to civil support.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF sustainment remains focused on supporting the VDV assault at Siversk. RF IO surrounding the corruption investigation into former MoD HR chief Kuznestov (silver epaulets found) is likely an internal distraction/purging effort that does not immediately impact operational logistics.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in executing large-scale, synchronized multi-domain operations (Wave 3 and Siversk assault). However, RF continues to utilize disinformation channels (TASS/Marochko) to project psychological pressure, such as the claim that "Azov forces" were deployed to Siversk to contain deserters. This information is judged as propaganda designed to undermine UAF morale and cohesion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is critically stressed by the dual requirements of sustained defense at Siversk and urgent CI/logistical recovery in the rear. The 110th Separate Mechanized Brigade's effective anti-armor defense at Siversk demonstrates strong tactical readiness, but overall strategic resilience is strained by the confirmed CI damage in Lviv.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Setback (Strategic): Confirmed strategic damage resulting in the Lviv heating failure and significant disruption to the central logistical triangle.
• Success (Tactical): Confirmed anti-armor success by the 110th Mech BDE against RF VDV assault forces at Siversk.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The immediate requirement for Mobile PPO/C-UAS Systems is paramount to protect CI repair crews and contingency power sources (DP 365). Logistical capacity is severely constrained by the massed strikes on the central triangle (Dnipro/Zaporizhzhia), requiring rapid rerouting and redundancy activation.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

• RF IO Focus (Morale Degradation): RF sources (Marochko via TASS) are actively pushing the narrative that UAF forces at Siversk are suffering desertions and require internal security forces ("Azov") to contain them. Judgment: This is classic psychological warfare to degrade UAF morale and unit trust.
• RF IO Focus (Deterrence/Escalation Signal): Putin’s signaling of "new successful weapon tests" serves to amplify the kinetic escalation (Wave 3) and deter Western intervention/support by projecting overwhelming strategic capability.
• RF IO Focus (Internal Distraction): TASS continues to prioritize stories of corruption (Kuznetsov), global financial volatility (Crypto market loss), and international displays of force (DPRK Hwasong-20 missile), all intended to distract the domestic Russian audience from the war's costs and operational setbacks.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF public sentiment is likely stressed by the confirmed long-term heating failure in Lviv and ongoing power issues across the country, increasing reliance on civil defense messaging (DSNS guidance on appliance safety). This highlights the success of RF strategy in imposing costs on the civilian populace.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF signaling (via TASS) regarding the DPRK Hwasong-20 missile likely serves as an opportunistic, indirect strategic signal to the West regarding the potential for non-conventional escalation or the deployment of long-range strike capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

RF will seek to rapidly exploit the logistical and strategic effects achieved by Wave 3. The MLCOA remains the coupling of sustained kinetic pressure (Siversk) with denial of UAF logistical recovery.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Exploitation of Logistical Crisis and Attrition): RF will intensify ground-attack aviation and artillery support for the VDV assault at Siversk, leveraging the expected disruption of UAF supply lines due to Wave 3 damage. Concurrently, RF will launch secondary strikes targeting CI repair convoys, temporary logistical nodes, and mobile generator/depot locations near Lviv, Dnipro, and Zaporizhzhia over the next 48 hours. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Justification: RF has successfully generated the crisis; the next logical step is to prevent recovery and exploit the resulting operational window at Siversk.

MLCOA 2 (Tactical Reserve Isolation): RF reconnaissance assets (UAVs/EW) will increase surveillance of major roads and rail lines leading into the Eastern FLOT (especially from the compromised central triangle) to identify and target UAF tactical reserve movements or logistical staging areas with precision (KABs/ballistic missiles), replicating the success near Berestok. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Justification: Demonstrated RF reconnaissance-strike effectiveness and the necessity to prevent UAF reinforcement of Siversk.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Massed Air-Burst Targeting): RF commits operational reserves at Siversk supported by a massed launch of UAVs, specifically those suspected of carrying the air-burst fragmentation warhead (Geran-2 variant), aimed directly at UAF defensive trenches and temporary deployment areas (PVDs) adjacent to the Siversk salient. This aims to cause mass casualties, reduce the effectiveness of fixed defensive positions, and trigger a tactical withdrawal. (DP 363)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Execute Logistical Rerouting and Dispersal (CRITICAL PRIORITY - DP 366):

   • Recommendation: Immediately activate pre-planned contingency Main Supply Routes (MSRs) and establish dispersed, low-signature logistical hubs further west and north of the compromised central triangle. Assume all major rail hubs in the central region are non-functional for 72 hours.
   • Action: Deny RF MLCOA 1 (Exploitation of logistical crisis) and ensure supply continuity to Siversk.

2. Surge Point Defense for CI Repair Crews (URGENT PRIORITY - DP 365):

   • Recommendation: Re-task at least 50% of available mobile SHORAD/C-UAS assets to protect repair crews, mobile generator hubs, and temporary energy depots in Lviv and the central-southern regions. These assets must be relocated immediately, given the Lviv failure.
   • Action: Deny RF MLCOA 1 (Targeting repair crews) and expedite restoration of critical services before severe winter weather.

3. Reinforce and Maintain Anti-Armor Momentum at Siversk (TACTICAL PRIORITY - DP 363):

   • Recommendation: Sustain the flow of FPV drones and heavy anti-armor assets (ATGM teams) to the 110th and adjacent brigades at Siversk. Prepare pre-planned fire missions against identified RF troop and armor concentrations to blunt the VDV assault.
   • Action: Impose maximum attrition costs on the RF ground COG, buying time for rear-area logistical recovery.

//END REPORT//