Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - RF SHAPING OPERATIONS AND HYBRID WARFARE INTENSIFICATION

TIME: 101400Z OCT 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational focus remains bifurcated: continuous, high-intensity ground attrition on the Eastern Axis (Siversk/Donetsk) and a sustained, multi-domain CI and logistics interdiction campaign across the deep rear (Dnipro/Zaporizhzhia/Lviv).

• Eastern Axis (Siversk/Donetsk): Confirmed high-yield UAF drone strikes (SBU CSO 'A', FP-2 with 105kg warheads) against RF materiel and personnel concentrations in Donetsk Oblast (Butusov+ report). This indicates UAF is responding to the Siversk ground push with deep interdiction fires.
• Central-Southern Axis (Zaporizhzhia/Dnipro): RF tactical aviation is highly active, launching Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) towards Zaporizhzhia and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts. This confirms RF is leveraging air superiority to sustain the Wave 3 BDA follow-up by targeting recovery efforts or secondary infrastructure. Confirmed air raid alerts are in effect for Zaporizhzhia.
• Northern Axis (Chernihiv/Kyiv): Confirmed "Geran" UAV activity over Nizhyn (Chernihiv Oblast) resulting in a large smoke plume, and reports of multiple UAVs over Kharkiv. This confirms the immediate follow-up to Wave 3 is already in progress, utilizing low-cost drones to prevent CI recovery.
• Deep Rear (Lviv): Mayor Sadovyi confirms the multi-week delay of the heating season due to RF strikes, solidifying the strategic effect of Wave 3 on civilian sustainment.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

The confirmed long-term damage to centralized heating in Lviv (West) elevates the importance of winterization planning across all operational zones. The operational window for RF to inflict maximum non-kinetic damage via CI strikes before winter is closing, which may incentivize further, immediate mass strikes.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• Friendly Force Status (UAF): UAF demonstrates tactical resilience (SBU deep strikes, Ukrenergo partial power restoration in Kyiv/Kharkiv). UAF leadership is actively engaged in international diplomacy focusing on CI restoration aid (Zelenskyy meeting with Norway/Netherlands). UAF Air Force is tracking high RF tactical aviation activity and KAB launches.
• RF Force Status (Tactical/Deep Strike): RF is utilizing a multi-asset strike mix: heavy KABs (likely Su-34 deployed) on the Southern Axis and persistent Geran UAV swarms on the Central/Northern Axis. This resource allocation suggests a renewed focus on preventing logistical recovery in the central triangle and disrupting forward deployment efforts near the FLOT.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(INTENTION - Strategic Signaling and Hybrid Warfare): RF intentions are rapidly evolving into coordinated hybrid warfare:

1. Impose Long-Term Strategic Cost (Kinetic): Utilize sustained, dispersed drone strikes (Geran) and high-yield KABs (Zaporizhzhia/Dnipro) to solidify the strategic damage from Wave 3, particularly targeting CI repair crews, rail choke points, and temporary logistical nodes.
2. Force Diplomatic Leverage (IO): RF political figures (Ushakov) are offering conditional peace negotiations post-Alaska, contingent on US/Europe forcing "positivity" from Kyiv. This narrative aims to shift blame for the conflict's continuation and capitalize on international anxiety following the Wave 3 escalation.
3. Induce Cognitive Collapse (IO): Aggressively leverage internal Ukrainian political rhetoric (Bezuhla's statement on full blackout) through RF milbloggers to amplify fear, demand resource diversion, and erode public trust in government resilience.

(CAPABILITIES): RF retains the capability to execute continuous, simultaneous, multi-asset strikes across three operational zones (Siversk ground pressure, KAB strikes on Zaporizhzhia, Geran strikes on Chernihiv/Kharkiv).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The primary tactical adaptation is the immediate, low-cost Geran follow-up to the high-cost Wave 3 ballistic strike. This rapid transition suggests a pre-planned strategy to maintain pressure on the grid and prevent effective BDA/repair operations in the critical 48-hour window post-major strike.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF logistics are supporting sustained VDV pressure at Siversk. Ukrainian logistics face severe strain, with resources diverted to civil CI repair (Ukrenergo reporting partial restoration in Kyiv/Kharkiv). The successful SBU strikes (FP-2 with 105kg warheads) suggest UAF is actively targeting RF forward logistical and C2 nodes to mitigate the Siversk ground threat.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 shows effective synchronization between kinetic assets (Geran/KAB deployment) and the Information Environment (immediate diplomatic signaling and IO amplification). The internal turmoil in Russia (arrest of the St. Petersburg deputy Mal’kevich, a former Prigozhin associate) is localized and does not appear to affect strategic military C2, but suggests continued internal security consolidation.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF remains actively defensive and responsive. The Air Force is performing effective air traffic control (tracking KABs and tactical aviation). SBU forces are executing deep precision strikes, demonstrating the retention of high-value offensive capabilities despite the rear-area kinetic pressure.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Confirmed successful application of specialized, heavy UAF strike drones (FP-2/105kg warhead) against key RF materiel/personnel targets in Donetsk Oblast.
• Ukrenergo confirmed partial power restoration in Kyiv and reduced limitations in Kharkiv, showing rapid, effective initial response to Wave 3.
• Successful high-level diplomatic engagement securing aid for energy sector restoration (Norway/Netherlands).

Setbacks:

• Confirmed strategic damage forcing multi-week heating delay in Lviv.
• Confirmed sustained RF KAB/Geran activity across the central/northern axes, indicating a failure to completely deny RF air/drone access to the deep rear.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The most critical immediate requirement is dedicated mobile SHORAD and counter-UAS systems to protect CI repair crews and rapidly deployed contingency power hubs from the confirmed follow-up Geran/KAB strikes. Long-term constraints center on specialized large-scale replacement parts for grid infrastructure.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

RF IO is executing a unified Deterrence-Exploitation-Negotiation loop:

• Deterrence: Putin signals new weapons and military resolve (Kotsnews).
• Exploitation (Cognitive Shock): RF milbloggers (Alex Parker Returns, Dnevnik Desantnika) use the Lviv and Bezuhla news to push the narrative of total, inevitable grid collapse and the ineffectiveness of Ukrainian aid, while simultaneously calling for more strikes to maintain pressure.
• Negotiation Signal: Ushakov's statement to TASS proposes conditional negotiations ("if the US achieves positivity from Europe and Kyiv"), positioning Russia as the reasonable actor post-escalation.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Public sentiment is characterized by high anxiety regarding winter readiness, validated by the Lviv announcement and the constant air raid activity. UAF efforts (Zelenskyy, Zaporizhzhia ODA forum) focus on showcasing international support and local resilience (Kryvyi Rih community life efforts) to stabilize morale.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

International support remains robust, focusing explicitly on energy sector restoration (Norway/Netherlands). The Zaporizhzhia ODA hosted a significant international delegation (UN, EIB, EU), which directly counters the RF narrative of regional instability.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

The analysis indicates RF is transitioning immediately from massed strategic strike (Wave 3) to sustained, multi-layered attrition and interdiction (Wave 3.5).

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Sustained Geran/KAB Interdiction): RF will maintain the high operational tempo of low-signature strikes (Geran) and targeted high-yield strikes (KABs/Kh-59s) for the next 48-72 hours. Primary targets will be mobile CI repair convoys, temporary C2 nodes, critical logistic rail hubs in the Dnipro/Kryvyi Rih/Kharkiv triangle, and SHORAD positions identified during Wave 3. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Siversk Breakthrough Attempt): RF will leverage the rear-area logistical disruption caused by Wave 3 and MLCOA 1 to increase intensity at Siversk within the next 48 hours, hoping to force UAF operational reserves to be held in the rear area or deployed piecemeal to the front. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Targeted Rail Choke-Point Destruction): RF intelligence utilizes current ISR and BDA data to execute a highly concentrated, precision ballistic strike (Iskander/Kinzhal) on one of the few remaining major, intact rail junctions or cross-river bridges essential for supplying the Eastern Axis (e.g., a high-priority target within the Dnipro or Poltava region). Successful execution would severely delay large-scale UAF resupply for 2-4 weeks.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Execute Focused, Mobile Anti-UAS Defense (TACTICAL URGENCY - DP 304):

   • Recommendation: Prioritize protecting CI restoration efforts from the confirmed Geran swarm follow-up.
   • Action: Deploy mobile air defense teams (M-SHORAD or heavy machine gun C-UAS teams) in a continuous, rotating patrol pattern along the key logistical corridors linking Kyiv, Poltava, and Dnipro. This must be the immediate allocation priority for newly received C-UAS assets.

2. Harden Key Logistic Choke-Points (OPERATIONAL URGENCY):

   • Recommendation: Mitigate MDCOA 1 risk by reinforcing air defense around the most critical, yet still-operational, rail hubs and river crossings in the central region (Dnipro/Kryvyi Rih/Kremenchuk).
   • Action: Utilize existing longer-range air defense assets (e.g., NASAMS/Patriot if feasible) to establish overlapping defensive umbrellas over critical infrastructure identified as essential to Eastern Axis sustainment.

3. Implement Unified Cognitive Defense Strategy (STRATEGIC URGENCY - DP 305):

   • Recommendation: Directly counter the RF "collapse before winter" and "conditional peace" IO narratives to stabilize public morale and maintain international support continuity.
   • Action: The Office of the President and the MFA must release a joint statement clearly condemning the RF strategy of "negotiation through terror" (Wave 3) and publish a transparent, verified report on the current status of energy recovery and winter preparation efforts, emphasizing international support (Norway/Netherlands).

//END REPORT//