Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - OPERATIONAL UPDATE (SHIFTING FOCUS AND STRATEGIC RESPONSE)

TIME: 090600Z OCT 25 (Update 10 - Post-Retaliation and Southern Advance Indicator) AOR: Zaporizhzhia Front (Tokmak Direction), Odesa Oblast (Black Sea/Coastal), Russian Deep Rear (Khabarovsk), Information Environment ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (Confidence is high regarding RF's propaganda and domestic activity. Tactical assessments in Zaporizhzhia and Odesa are based on RF claims and obscured local reporting, limiting confidence on specific BDA or penetration depth.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational geometry is defined by the strategic counter-retaliation phase following UAF deep strikes, combined with a potential shift in RF ground operations emphasis toward the South (Zaporizhzhia Oblast).

• Zaporizhzhia Front (Novohryhorivka): RF military expert (Marochko, TASS, 090210Z) claims RF forces have "liberated" Novohryhorivka and are advancing along a 10km wide section of the front. This village is strategically significant as it lies south-east of Orikhiv, indicating renewed pressure against UAF defensive lines protecting the deeper logistic hubs.
  • KEY TERRAIN IMPACT: If confirmed, this advance represents a significant gain in the Tokmak direction, forcing UAF to reinforce or risk a local collapse that jeopardizes the flank of the Orikhiv sector.
• Odesa Oblast (Coastal Axis): Localized kinetic activity is indicated by low-quality, heavily watermarked visual evidence (Dva Mayora, 090206Z) showing an explosion near an electrical transmission tower (pylon) and a separate night-time explosion/fire.
  • KEY TERRAIN IMPACT: This suggests continued RF targeting of critical infrastructure along the Black Sea coast, likely focused on energy supply and connectivity, maintaining pressure on the strategic port of Odesa.
• Northern Axis (Lipetsk/Krasnoarmeysky): Previous reports of reconnaissance-strike activity and Tor-M2 engagements remain valid, indicating sustained attrition efforts in those sectors.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change from previous. Optimal for tactical fixed-wing aviation and reconnaissance systems.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF forces are operating along three primary vectors:

1. Ground Offensive (Zaporizhzhia): Claimed advance on a wide front (10+ km) near Novohryhorivka (FACT/RF Propaganda, 090210Z).
2. Infrastructure Attrition (Odesa): Continued kinetic targeting of critical energy infrastructure (Inferred from low-quality visual evidence).
3. Information Control/Domestic Shielding: Heavy focus on non-military domestic issues (narcotics busts, financial proposals) and foreign policy distractions (Moldova/EU).

UAF must immediately verify the situation at Novohryhorivka and allocate anti-armor and counter-mobility assets accordingly.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - Ground Offensive): RF claims to have the capability to execute and sustain a wide-front advance (10+ km) in the Zaporizhzhia sector. While the success of this advance is unconfirmed, the claim itself indicates the strategic intent to shift focus south, perhaps utilizing forces drawn from previously static positions.

(INTENTION - Shift Pressure/Exploit Vulnerability):

• Zaporizhzhia Breakthrough: RF intends to seize and hold ground near Novohryhorivka, forcing UAF to divert reserves from the critical Siversk salient (Eastern Axis) or risk a deeper penetration toward Orikhiv/Huliaipole.
• Coastal Paralysis: RF intends to continually degrade UAF energy infrastructure in coastal zones (Odesa) to impact supply chains and civilian morale.
• Propaganda Reinforcement: The TASS release on Novohryhorivka is intended to counter the effect of the Orsk deep strike and project an image of operational success and momentum domestically.

(COURSES OF ACTION - Indicated): The current COA involves a high-attrition/deep-strike environment combined with localized ground offensives on multiple axes (Siversk, Zaporizhzhia).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The shift in emphasis to the Zaporizhzhia front, if confirmed, represents a re-prioritization of ground efforts. RF may be testing UAF's ability to defend simultaneously against a VDV-led assault in Siversk and a conventional advance in Zaporizhzhia, looking for the weakest point.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF utilizes heavy focus on domestic law enforcement issues (Khabarovsk drug bust, 090208Z) and economic proposals (Micro-finance ban, 090214Z) to displace war-related news, indicating continued operational security around long-term logistical sustainment, which is likely under strain following the GPP/Orsk strikes.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating effective information discipline by utilizing pro-military milbloggers (Dva Mayora) and state media (TASS) to rapidly propagate claims of localized success (Novohryhorivka advance) and to confirm strikes on UAF infrastructure (Odesa).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF readiness is critical on both the Eastern and Southern Axes. Units in the Zaporizhzhia sector must be on high alert for concerted mechanized attacks, supported by artillery, following the Novohryhorivka claim. The sustained targeting of energy infrastructure in Odesa requires heightened force protection and rapid damage assessment capability for repair crews.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

1. The strategic success of the Orsk/GPP strikes continues to compel RF to respond kinetically and informationally.

Setbacks:

1. The unconfirmed, but reported, RF advance near Novohryhorivka represents a potential threat to UAF defensive cohesion in the Southern sector.
2. Continued infrastructure damage in Odesa impacts UAF long-term operational resilience.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The potential multi-axis offensive (Siversk VDV + Zaporizhzhia advance) demands immediate resource planning for cross-sector reserve deployment. Anti-armor capabilities are urgently required to meet the claimed 10km wide advance in Zaporizhzhia.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Hybrid Operations)

• RF External Influence (Moldova): TASS propagates a claim that EU curators demand Moldova recognize Russia as a threat (090225Z). This narrative attempts to portray Western support for Moldova as coercive and aggressive, appealing to Moldovan domestic opposition sentiment.
• RF Domestic Distraction: The high-visibility drug bust in Khabarovsk and financial proposals are designed to shift domestic Russian attention away from the conflict's intensity and the effects of UAF deep strikes.
• RF Military Success Narrative: The rapid reporting of the "liberation" of Novohryhorivka (090210Z) aims to project military dominance following the embarrassment of the Orsk strike.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The focus on law and order and financial stability in the RF media suggests Moscow is highly sensitive to potential domestic dissent or economic anxiety. The continued strikes on Odesa infrastructure are designed to erode Ukrainian civilian morale and confidence in UAF's ability to protect key regions.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RF narrative concerning Moldova's foreign policy is an attempt to disrupt Ukraine's diplomatic flank and destabilize its neighbors, a classic component of hybrid warfare.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

The operational shift is evident: RF is applying pressure on the Siversk Salient (VDV) while simultaneously claiming a major breakthrough in Zaporizhzhia, forcing UAF to commit resources across a wider front.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Coordinated Multi-Axis Ground Pressure): RF will sustain the high-intensity ground assaults on the Siversk salient (Eastern Axis) while simultaneously reinforcing the advance near Novohryhorivka (Southern Axis). This aims to prevent UAF from consolidating reserves and defending either sector effectively. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Indicated by confirmed VDV presence in Siversk and Marochko's claim regarding Novohryhorivka.)

MLCOA 2 (Strategic Retaliatory Strike - Continuation): RF will execute the previously anticipated high-precision missile strike against a critical UAF logistics node (POL or major rail hub). The infrastructure strikes in Odesa are likely precursors or tactical components of this larger strike package. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - The Orsk strike necessitates a commensurate strategic response.)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Exploitation of Southern Breakthrough): Should the Novohryhorivka advance prove to be a successful breakthrough on a wide front, RF forces could commit additional reserve armored formations to exploit the gap, bypassing Orikhiv/Huliaipole defenses and threatening deeper UAF operational lines toward Zaporizhzhia City. This would sever critical defensive linkages. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Based on RF claims of 10km wide advance; confirmation of scale is required.)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Immediate Verification and Response in Zaporizhzhia (OPERATIONAL - CRITICAL):

   • Recommendation: The claimed 10km wide advance near Novohryhorivka (090210Z) must be treated as a confirmed threat until proven otherwise. This requires immediate confirmation via ISR (DP 160).
   • Action: Pre-position at least one Mobile Reserve Task Force (MRTF), heavy on anti-armor assets and supported by counter-battery fire, on standby to counter-attack or reinforce defensive lines south-east of Orikhiv.

2. Harden Critical Infrastructure Against Dual-Axis Attack (STRATEGIC - CRITICAL):

   • Recommendation: RF is striking coastal infrastructure (Odesa) while preparing the strategic missile response (MLCOA 2).
   • Action: Increase force protection (C-UAS/security teams) around all critical rail chokepoints and power generation facilities within 100km of the Odesa coast. Prioritize these assets for immediate AD cover.

3. Cross-Sector EMCON Discipline (TACTICAL - HIGH):

   • Recommendation: The reported use of the Tor-M2 against a Switchblade 600 (Previous Report) and the persistent UAV activity (Lipetsk) confirm RF's effective reconnaissance-strike cycle.
   • Action: All UAF units, particularly logistics and C2 in the Siversk and Zaporizhzhia sectors, must maintain REDCON-1 EMCON discipline, strictly controlling radio and electronic signatures to deny RF targeting data, particularly during consolidation or movement.

//END REPORT//