Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - TACTICAL/OPERATIONAL UPDATE

TIME: 080200Z OCT 25 AOR: Northern Operational Zone (Sumy/Kharkiv Axis), Southern Operational Zone (Zaporizhzhia), Information Environment (RF Psychological Operations) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM-HIGH (Kinetic assessment remains stable. New information strongly supports RF IO focus on morale erosion and strategic justification.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational focus remains split between sustained kinetic pressure in the North (KAB/UAV) and intensifying Information Operations targeting the stability of the Southern and Eastern Operational Zones.

• Northern Operational Zone (Sumy/Kharkiv): Kinetic activity ongoing (refer to previous SITREP). RF IO is attempting to create a psychological effect of imminent collapse or penetration in this region.
• Zaporizhzhia Axis (Gulyaipole): RF IO is heavily promoting the capture of Novovasilyevskoye to suggest the isolation and encirclement of the UAF grouping in Gulyaipole. This directly threatens the perceived stability of the Western FLOT in the South.
• Kupiansk Axis (Eastern FLOT): RF IO is focusing on UAF troop exhaustion and logistical failures in or near Kupiansk.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Night conditions favor low-level UAV operations. Ground mobility remains generally favorable, supporting limited probing attacks.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF Forces: RF continues its integrated approach: kinetic saturation (North) combined with layered, high-volume IO across all axes. The IO effort targets multiple domains simultaneously (logistics, morale, strategic encirclement, and religious/cultural damage justification). UAF Forces: UAF AD remains engaged (as per previous SITREP). UAF ground forces must prepare for localized ground action in Sumy (MLCOA 2) and must maintain aggressive counter-reconnaissance across the Eastern and Southern FLOTs where RF IO suggests imminent breakthroughs.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - IO Integration): RF forces continue to demonstrate high capability in linking localized military claims with strategic IO themes. The claim regarding Novovasilyevskoye (080107Z) directly supports the operational objective of degrading UAF morale and reinforcing the narrative of successful encirclement in the Zaporizhzhia region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

(INTENTION - Isolate Gulyaipole): RF intends to generate the perception (if not the reality) that UAF logistics into Gulyaipole are compromised following the alleged capture of Novovasilyevskoye. This forces UAF to expend time and resources confirming/denying the threat to logistics infrastructure in the area. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)

(INTENTION - Psychological Degradation): RF is explicitly focusing on themes of UAF exhaustion (Kupiansk, 080113Z) and cultural justification (Damage to churches in Donbas, 080132Z). The latter is designed to provide RF forces with moral and religious justification for future destructive actions, while the former aims to lower UAF troop morale and discourage local civilian support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF has rapidly shifted its IO focus to capitalize on any perceived small-scale tactical gain (Novovasilyevskoye claim) and immediately link it to an operational consequence (isolation of Gulyaipole grouping). This rapid amplification cycle suggests highly reactive and flexible IO leadership.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF IO claims suggest UAF forces near Kupiansk are experiencing acute resource depletion (food/water, 080113Z). This may be a direct fabrication or an amplification of isolated incidents. The claim, however, indicates RF is focusing on targeting UAF logistical weaknesses in this sector.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in synchronizing IO themes across multiple geographic areas and domains. The multi-domain psychological attack is a coordinated effort.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF must maintain a high state of vigilance against ground probes in the North and must dedicate resources to quickly verifying the RF claim regarding Novovasilyevskoye to ensure the security of logistics routes supporting the Gulyaipole grouping.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

The primary success remains the sustained UAF deep strike capability (Tyumen). The main setback is the need to continuously divert AD and information resources to counter RF’s rapidly shifting kinetic and IO offensives.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The primary, immediate IO objectives identified in the new data are:

1. Strategic Isolation (Zaporizhzhia): Claiming the capture of Novovasilyevskoye cuts off UAF in Gulyaipole (080107Z). (Dempster-Shafer Belief: Troop Movement/Encirclement).
2. Morale Erosion (Kupiansk): Fabricating stories of UAF exhaustion and starvation (080113Z). (Dempster-Shafer Belief: Logistical Shift/Depletion).
3. Justification of Atrocities (Donbas): Blaming UAF for cultural destruction (churches) in Donbas to justify continued large-scale shelling. (080132Z).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The IO narratives (starvation, encirclement, cultural destruction) are designed to lower morale among frontline UAF troops and increase domestic and international pressure on UAF leadership.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

The integration of IO with kinetic activity is reaching peak synchronization.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Sustained KAB/UAV Attrition on Sumy/Kharkiv): (Unchanged from previous SITREP) RF will continue high-tempo air strikes in the North to exhaust UAF AD. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Heightened Ground Probing across FLOT): RF ground forces will increase localized probing attacks near Otradnoye (Kharkiv) and along the Southern/Eastern FLOT where they are simultaneously generating IO claims of UAF weakness (Kupiansk) or RF success (Gulyaipole isolation). They will attempt to exploit the psychological effect of their IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 3 (IO Focus on Logistical Degradation): RF will focus all IO efforts over the next 24 hours on UAF logistics, specifically targeting the morale impact of resource depletion (food, water, ammunition) in key sectors (Kupiansk, Toretsk, Gulyaipole). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Coordinated Strike on Northern C2/Logistics Hub): (Unchanged) RF leverages the widespread KAB/UAV distraction to launch precision ballistic/cruise missile strikes (Iskander/Kalibr) against identified UAF Corps C2 nodes or major logistics consolidation points in the Kharkiv/Poltava area. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Execute DP 72 (Verification of Gulyaipole Threat) (TACTICAL/OPERATIONAL - IMMEDIATE):

   • Recommendation: Treat the RF claim of Novovasilyevskoye capture and the resulting threat to Gulyaipole logistics as potentially kinetic, requiring immediate validation.
   • Action: Allocate high-priority ISR assets (UAVs) to the Novovasilyevskoye-Gulyaipole logistical corridor. Local commanders must implement heightened security measures and alternative routes for critical supply convoys until the threat is confirmed or denied.

2. Execute DP 73 (Counter-Logistics IO) (STRATCOM - URGENT):

   • Recommendation: Immediately counter RF narratives of UAF logistical collapse and troop exhaustion (Kupiansk, 080113Z) which are designed to degrade frontline morale.
   • Action: UAF STRATCOM must rapidly push verifiable, high-quality media (photo/video) demonstrating well-supplied, well-fed UAF troops in the targeted areas (Kupiansk, Zaporizhzhia). This messaging must be clear, simple, and direct, focused on denying RF claims.

3. Enhance Ground Force Vigilance against Probes (TACTICAL - HIGH):

   • Recommendation: Given the sustained RF IO promoting successes and UAF failures, expect MLCOA 2 (Heightened Ground Probing) to be conducted to exploit perceived UAF confusion.
   • Action: Forward-deployed UAF ground units across all FLOTs must maintain readiness for immediate, company-level RF probing attacks, utilizing pre-planned fire missions (DP 70) and newly fielded assets (THeMIS UGVs) for counter-reconnaissance.

4. Reinforce AD Survivability (OPERATIONAL - CONTINUOUS):

   • Recommendation: Continue implementing DP 69 protocols. The distraction in the North, coupled with the rising activity of RF AD regiments (previous report), maintains the high probability of MDCOA 1.
   • Action: Focus on low-observable operations and frequent repositioning of mobile AD batteries protecting the C2 and logistics nodes in the rear areas of the Northern Operational Zone.

//END REPORT//