Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - TACTICAL/OPERATIONAL UPDATE

TIME: 080030Z OCT 25 (Update since previous report at 072330Z OCT 25) AOR: Central Operational Zone (Poltava/Cherkasy Axis), Eastern FLOT (Siversk-Vyemka Axis), Information Environment (RF Internal Dynamics) ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (Kinetic threat remains clear, but RF internal IO and resource dynamics require further SIGINT and HUMINT).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The Central Operational Zone remains under acute pressure from RF Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS). The operational focus has shifted eastward from Cherkasy towards Poltava/Kremenchuk.

• Central AD Axis (Dnipropetrovsk/Poltava/Cherkasy Oblasts): Confirmed continued RF Shahed/Geran-2 UAV transit. UAF Air Force reports confirm UAVs have crossed from Dnipropetrovsk Oblast into Poltava Oblast, heading toward Kremenchuk (072334Z). Kremenchuk remains a high-value logistics node (oil refinery, Dnipro crossings) and is the likely focus of the current wave. This sustains the distributed deep-strike campaign identified in the previous report.
• Eastern FLOT (Siversk - Vyemka Axis): Kinetic status is currently stable (SITREP at 072330Z). All previous warnings regarding imminent artillery preparation (DP 63) remain in effect.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions continue to heavily favor RF low-altitude UAV infiltration.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

RF Forces: RF continues its dual-strategy: 1) Physical attrition and AD saturation in the Central Zone, forcing resource commitment; 2) Sustained Information Warfare (IW) to stabilize internal narratives and project power (BARS-16, Akhmat propaganda). UAF Forces: UAF AD is engaged in the Central Zone. Ground forces on the Eastern FLOT are postured for immediate counter-battery fire (DP 63) and reserve readiness (DP 64).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - UAV Penetration): RF retains the capability for persistent, multi-axis, deep-rear strikes, successfully forcing UAF AD to fragment its coverage across the Dnipro river line and surrounding logistics hubs (Cherkasy, Kremenchuk). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

(INTENTION - Internal Cohesion/IW): RF is actively employing high-profile volunteer and elite units (BARS-16, Akhmat) in domestic propaganda to project an image of military effectiveness and internal unity.

• BARS-16 (Brigade 'Kuban') Propaganda (072332Z): The video thanks a prominent pro-war blogger (Colonelcassad), confirming the strong synergy between RF military units (volunteer reserves) and state-aligned information channels. This targets the domestic pro-war audience, seeking to validate the role of volunteer forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Akhmat Defense (080000Z): The need for an "Akhmat" unit leader ("Aid") to publicly address "informational attacks" (presumably rumors or criticism of their battlefield performance/status) suggests that significant friction or credibility issues exist within the RF military structure or the pro-war information space.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF has immediately shifted the center of gravity of the current UAV wave from the already struck Cherkasy (reported explosions at 072312Z) to the next major logistics node, Kremenchuk/Poltava, demonstrating rapid tactical re-tasking based on real-time UAF AD response.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The persistent targeting of major central logistics hubs (Cherkasy, Kremenchuk) indicates RF's strategic goal of interdicting the cross-country flow of materiel. The confirmed movement toward Kremenchuk, home to a significant oil refinery and rail hub, aligns with the previous day's general targeting pattern (POL/Rail infrastructure).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains effective in coordinating distributed kinetic operations with immediate post-strike re-tasking and synchronized IW efforts, despite emerging internal friction indicated by the "Akhmat" defense messaging.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking) (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF AD units are operating under high stress, engaging multiple, sequential UAV waves spanning hundreds of kilometers. Readiness on the Eastern FLOT remains paramount, focused on countering the predicted ground action (MDCOA 1/DP 63).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes: UAF AD successfully contained the Cherkasy strike (partial penetration reported 072330Z), preventing a full saturation of the area. Setbacks: The continued penetration of deep-strike packages forces a high rate of AD interceptor expenditure and continues to strain AD personnel.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain) (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

The primary IW effort is now focused internally:

• Morale Reinforcement: The BARS-16/Colonelcassad video serves to reinforce the morale of volunteer forces and their support networks, countering narratives of poor equipment or effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Friction Management: The need to defend the "Akhmat" unit leadership suggests a failure to fully control the narrative surrounding key high-profile units, potentially indicating internal political/military friction that can be exploited by UAF PSYOP efforts.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

Sustained deep strikes increase anxiety. However, RF's domestic IO (TASS reporting domestic benefits increases and education reform proposals, 072357Z – 080001Z) aims to project an image of normal governance and stability, likely attempting to neutralize domestic opposition to the ongoing conflict costs.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

The dual-pressure strategy (Kinetic strikes in the Center/South + Ground preparation on the FLOT) is validated by current movement.

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1 (Deep Strike Attrition Focus on Kremenchuk/Poltava): RF will continue to direct the current UAV wave toward Kremenchuk/Poltava for the next 4-6 hours (until dawn), targeting key energy and rail infrastructure in the area to follow up the Cherkasy strike. This maintains pressure on UAF Central Command to commit reserves away from the FLOT. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

MLCOA 2 (Execution of FLOT Artillery Prep): Unchanged. RF will execute massed indirect fire on the Siversk-Vyemka axis within the next 1-3 hours, leveraging previously confirmed ISR to degrade UAF defensive positions ahead of a potential ground probe. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1 (Localized Ground Assault - Siversk): Unchanged. RF commits a reinforced company or battalion tactical group (BTG residual) to assault key positions near Vyemka, supported by intense KAB/Artillery fire, aiming for a shallow penetration to force UAF tactical reserves to commit. This remains the immediate physical threat resulting from the current AD distraction campaign. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Dynamic AD Re-tasking to Kremenchuk (OPERATIONAL - CRITICAL):

   • Recommendation: Immediate re-tasking of mobile AD fire units that were previously engaged in Cherkasy toward the Kremenchuk/Poltava area to meet the confirmed threat vector (072334Z).
   • Action: Direct local AD commands to activate pre-planned contingency defensive sectors (e.g., shoot-and-scoot sites) focused on protecting the Kremenchuk oil refinery and the Dnipro river crossings.

2. Execute DP 63 (Counter-Battery) on Siversk Axis (TACTICAL - IMMEDIATE):

   • Recommendation: Given the confirmed persistent ISR and the current deep-strike distraction campaign, RF artillery preparation (MLCOA 2) is highly imminent.
   • Action: Ground commanders in the Siversk operational area are authorized to execute pre-approved Counter-Battery Fire Missions (DP 63) immediately upon the first sustained RF artillery registration fire or confirmation of high-value RF systems activation.

3. Exploit RF Internal IO Friction (STRATEGIC/PSYOP - MEDIUM TERM):

   • Recommendation: Leverage the emerging IO friction and the public defense of the "Akhmat" unit (080000Z) to sow discord and exploit morale issues within key RF units.
   • Action: UAF PSYOP should prepare targeted, subtle messaging via social media and tactical leaflet drops focused on unit ineffectiveness, leadership failures, and infighting within the RF volunteer/elite forces, particularly regarding units confirmed to be experiencing internal scrutiny.

//END REPORT//