Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - RISING KINETIC PRESSURE IN ZAPORIZHZHIA

TIME: 061200Z OCT 25 AOR: Eastern FLOT (Kupiansk), Southern Operational Zone (Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk), and Deep Strike Theater (Crimea). REPORTING PERIOD: 060600Z OCT 25 – 061200Z OCT 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): MEDIUM (Increased confirmed RF aviation activity complicates tactical planning in the South.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT (Southern Operational Zone - CRITICAL): RF Air Force is executing concentrated strikes using Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs/GLIDARBs) against UAF positions and infrastructure in the Zaporizhzhia Oblast (Confirmed multiple KAB launches, including repeat strikes near Komyshuvakha and generalized attacks on Zaporizhzhia city/Oblast).

FACT (Eastern FLOT - Fixed Wing Threat): Air Force alerts confirm the immediate threat of RF aviation ordnance against the Kupiansk and Izium districts (Kharkiv Oblast), indicating continued air support for RF ground fixation efforts in the East.

FACT (Deep Strike Reciprocity - Crimea): Unverified Ukrainian sources claim renewed drone attacks and explosions in Russian-occupied Crimea (Saky, Feodosia, Yevpatoriia), reinforcing the continued UAF deep strike focus on Black Sea fleet and logistics hubs. This follows the confirmed strikes on Tuapse/Feodosia in the previous period.

ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT (River Crossings): Pro-RF sources claim successful targeting of a "UAF crossing" (ПЕРЕПРАВА ВСУ) and a possible Forward Deployment Point (ПВД ВСУ) near a river line, likely in the Eastern or Southern operational zone (Dobropillia - Petrivka area). This suggests RF ISR is prioritizing counter-mobility and targeting of UAF logistical movement across water obstacles. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No change from the previous report. Night operations remain the preferred window for deep strike operations (UAVs against Crimea, sustained RF UAV attacks in Kharkiv/Chernihiv).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

UAF Air Defense (AD): AD warnings confirm sustained RF operational tempo in the South and East (Kherson, Kryvyi Rih, Nikopol, Kupiansk), requiring UAF AD resources to be stretched across multiple critical axes. The repeated KAB launches on Zaporizhzhia highlight the AD vulnerability against stand-off glide weapons.

RF Force Positioning: RF aviation assets capable of launching KABs (Su-34/Su-35) are operating with impunity against targets in Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv. The repeated nature of the strikes confirms sustained RF close air support availability in the Southern Operational Zone.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - Precision Strike): RF is demonstrating an increased ability to execute rapid, repeated precision strikes using KABs in the Zaporizhzhia axis. This is a critical threat, as KABs offer a stand-off capability that bypasses most frontline SHORAD systems.

(INTENTION - Coercion and Attrition): RF intent is shifting focus dynamically:

1. Southern Disruption: RF is leveraging KABs in Zaporizhzhia to attrit UAF fixed positions and potentially disrupt emerging UAF offensive concentrations or logistics. This kinetic pressure is synchronized with the prior report's finding of sustained artillery fire on Kherson.
2. Information Manipulation: RF continues to use political and internal security narratives (FSB claims of prevented terror attacks, TASS quoting politicians on Tomahawk infrastructure, mercenary propaganda) to divert international attention and bolster domestic support.

(COURSES OF ACTION - Observed): RF is executing the MLCOA from the previous report concerning sustained pressure in the South, primarily via indirect fire and air power. The sustained KAB strikes in Zaporizhzhia replace the mass UAV strikes predicted for the immediate 24-48 hours, though the principle remains: immediate kinetic retaliation for UAF deep strikes.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF Adaptation: The immediate shift to repeated, concentrated KAB strikes on the Zaporizhzhia axis is a direct tactical adaptation to:

1. Exploit UAF AD Gaps: KABs target fixed positions from outside the range of most tactical AD units.
2. Sustain Pressure: Maintain high attrition rates despite the confirmed UAF deep strike success against RF fuel logistics (Tuapse/Feodosia).

UAF Adaptation: UAF intelligence channels are effectively tracking and disseminating real-time KAB launch warnings (e.g., repeated warnings for Zaporizhzhia).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

RF Fuel: The strategic impact of the Tuapse and Feodosia strikes (previous report) remains valid, creating medium-term fuel constraints. However, RF ground forces are compensating in the short term by prioritizing high-impact air strikes (KABs) which, while demanding fuel for aircraft, reduce the immediate need for heavy ground force logistics (e.g., large-scale mechanized offensives).

UAF Logistical Corridors: RF claims regarding the successful targeting of a UAF river crossing point (Dobropillia-Petrivka) must be verified. If confirmed, this indicates RF ISR is successfully identifying key UAF logistical chokepoints, likely targeting resupply routes for forces on the Eastern FLOT.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains capable of coordinating immediate, large-scale, multi-vector retaliatory strikes (KAB attacks in two separate operational zones: Zaporizhzhia/Kharkiv) in response to UAF deep strikes.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture is defensive/attritional, successfully executing deep strikes while absorbing RF retaliatory air attacks. The focus must immediately shift to mitigating the KAB threat in Zaporizhzhia and hardening logistics against confirmed RF targeting of river crossings.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

TACTICAL SUCCESS: Continued successful UAF drone activity against RF deep targets (unverified reports in Saky/Yevpatoriia) sustains the RF logistical dilemma in Crimea and the Black Sea.

TACTICAL SETBACK (Vulnerability): Confirmed, repeated KAB attacks on Zaporizhzhia and the previous confirmed FAB-3000 strike on a northern bridge (previous daily report) highlight the ongoing and critical vulnerability of UAF fixed positions and infrastructure to heavy glide bombs.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The critical requirement is improved counter-KAB capability, either through forward deployment of longer-range AD systems (e.g., PATRIOT, NASAMS) or enhanced ground force dispersal to reduce target concentration.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF State/Proxy Media:

• Security Narrative: TASS and FSB affiliates (ASTRA, TASS) are heavily promoting internal security successes (prevented terror attacks in Pyatigorsk/Krasnoyarsk) to project an image of stability and effective state control against internal threats.
• Deterrence Messaging: RF Duma officials (TASS, Kartapolov) are attempting to deter future long-range aid transfers by claiming UAF lacks Tomahawk launch infrastructure, a preemptive cognitive defense mechanism.
• Mercenary Exploitation: Pro-RF channels (Colonelcassad) are exploiting perceived mistreatment of foreign fighters (Colombians) to discredit UAF and discourage foreign recruitment.

UAF STRATCOM: UAF sources (RBC-Ukraine) are focusing on confirmed infrastructure damage (Kharkiv power outage) caused by RF strikes, seeking to rally support and highlight RF attacks on civilian infrastructure.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

RF attempts to leverage the "panic" narrative (previous daily report) continue, but UAF morale likely remains sustained by the successful deep strikes on RF energy/logistics (Tuapse/Feodosia). However, sustained, mass KAB attacks (Zaporizhzhia) carry a high psychological cost that must be monitored.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

RF continues to push anti-Western diplomatic narratives (Merkel quotes, Polish destabilization of OSCE) aimed at fracturing European consensus. There is no new, confirmed commitment of long-range Western aid, though the Tomahawk speculation (RF source) indicates RF concern over future deliveries.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Sustain KAB-Centric Attrition (South): RF will maintain a high operational tempo of KAB launches against logistics hubs, C2 nodes, and troop concentrations in the Zaporizhzhia and Dnipropetrovsk axes for the next 48 hours to capitalize on the demonstrated vulnerability and to degrade UAF ability to maneuver. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

MLCOA 2: Focused Counter-Mobility Operations (East/South): RF ISR/strike assets will increase targeting of known or suspected UAF river crossing points, bridges, and forward assembly areas (e.g., near Dobropillia-Petrivka) to disrupt UAF logistics and preparatory maneuvers. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

MLCOA 3: Intensified Information Retaliation: RF media will significantly increase propaganda efforts relating to internal Ukrainian instability, corruption (exploiting previous MoD news), and military setbacks to counter the confirmed BDA of the Tuapse/Feodosia strikes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Ground Offensive Exploitation (Pokrovsk/2652nd Base): RF executes a large-scale, multi-division mechanized offensive (fed by materiel from the 2652nd Artillery Base, CRITICAL GAP) aimed at achieving an operational breakthrough on the Eastern FLOT (Pokrovsk), leveraging UAF resource commitments to counter the sustained air pressure in the South (MLCOA 1). (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

MDCOA 2: Coordinated Southern Offensive (Spoiling Attack across Dnipro): RF executes the previously identified spoiling attack across the Dnipro (Kherson) synchronized with the KAB pressure in Zaporizhzhia, forcing UAF to split the limited operational reserve to counter two separate high-risk maneuver axes. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize Counter-KAB AD Allocation (OPERATIONAL - CRITICAL):

   • Recommendation: Immediately move one long-range AD system (e.g., a PATRIOT battery or equivalent) to a strategic defensive depth position that covers the Zaporizhzhia and Dnipropetrovsk operational zones. If high-value AD assets are unavailable, increase the density of medium-range AD and EW systems (e.g., NASAMS, Buk-M1) on likely KAB flight paths to disrupt guidance systems.

2. Mitigate Crossing Vulnerability (TACTICAL):

   • Recommendation: Conduct immediate, unscheduled repositioning and hardening of all UAF river crossing points, pontoon bridge sites, and nearby troop assembly areas in the Eastern and Southern Operational Zones. Deploy robust localized counter-UAV and SHORAD coverage to counter RF ISR (UAVs/FPV).

3. Reinforce Frontline Dispersal (TACTICAL):

   • Recommendation: Order all forward-deployed UAF units (Battalion and below) in the Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv axes to increase dispersal measures and reduce signature/concentration at fixed positions, mitigating the devastating effect of the heavy KAB strikes (MLCOA 1).

4. Information Operations Countermeasure (STRATEGIC):

   • Recommendation: Direct STRATCOM to emphasize the ongoing damage to RF logistics (Tuapse/Feodosia) as operational leverage, utilizing verified BDA imagery to counter the RF propaganda blitz (MLCOA 3). Simultaneously, use local media to reassure citizens of enhanced AD presence in response to KAB threats.

//END REPORT//