Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE INTERDICTION AND LOGISTICAL COUNTER-STRIKES

TIME: 060830Z OCT 25 AOR: Multi-Domain Focus: Northern/Central Operational Zone (UAV Strike Aftermath), Eastern Operational Zone (Attritional Combat), Black Sea/Crimea (Deep Strike Exploitation). REPORTING PERIOD: 060800Z OCT 25 – 060830Z OCT 25 ANALYST CONFIDENCE (Overall): HIGH (Kinetic activity confirmed. UAF deep strike capability verified. RF attritional tactics persist.)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

FACT: The immediate threat from the multi-axis RF Shahed attack (previous SITREP) has been cleared, with AD alerts lifted in the Sumy region and reduced in others (referencing "Отбой красного уровня «Угроза атаки БПЛА»"). CRITICAL NEW FACT: UAF/UAF Proxy forces conducted a successful deep strike against a confirmed Oil Depot (Нафтобаза) in occupied Feodosia, Crimea. Visual evidence shows a significant explosion and fire column. This interdiction targets RF logistical sustainment in the Southern Operational Zone. FACT: RF forces destroyed a Nova Poshta (postal/logistics office) in Donetsk Oblast, confirming continued targeting of civilian and logistical infrastructure in the East.

KEY TERRAIN FOCUS:

1. Feodosia Oil Depot: Critical RF logistical node for fuel distribution in Crimea and the Southern front. Successful interdiction degrades RF forward sustainment.
2. Donetsk Oblast: The Nova Poshta strike confirms the continued RF strategy of interdicting civilian logistics and demoralizing the local population through infrastructure destruction.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

No significant changes. Clear conditions favor deep strike ISR and targeting, as demonstrated by the Feodosia strike.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

FACT: UAF AD units successfully managed the multi-axis Shahed threat, allowing for the stand-down of high-level threat warnings. ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT: The successful execution of the deep strike into Feodosia suggests UAF has retained adequate deep strike capabilities despite RF kinetic focus on Northern/Central infrastructure. The attack likely utilized longer-range UAVs or land-attack missiles.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - Attrition): RF maintains the capability to conduct persistent, localized high-intensity shelling and infrastructure strikes in the Eastern Operational Zone (Donetsk Oblast Nova Poshta strike). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

(INTENTION - Retaliation/Fixation): The primary RF intention following the successful UAF deep strike on Feodosia will be retaliation. This retaliation is likely to manifest as:

1. Immediate increase in UAV/missile strikes against UAF command or logistical nodes within operational range of the Southern front.
2. Amplification of pro-RF narratives (e.g., VDV propaganda, Rybar updates) to maintain morale and project operational normalcy despite the significant logistical hit.

(ANOMALOUS DATA - VDV Propaganda): RF-aligned channels (Дневник Десантника) are promoting morale-boosting VDV content ("Десантное братство, доброе утро!"). This suggests continued effort to sustain the motivation of key assault units, possibly in preparation for reinforcing or exploiting the existing ground pressure (e.g., in the East or potentially the MDCOA in Kherson).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

RF TACTICAL STAGNATION (EAST): RF tactics in the East remain focused on attritional shelling against civilian/logistical targets to break local resilience and degrade UAF rear area support.

UAF TACTICAL ADAPTATION (DEEP STRIKE): The strike on Feodosia is a critical UAF adaptation, directly targeting RF logistical depth in response to the RF’s multi-axis pressure campaign on UAF infrastructure.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

CRITICAL IMPACT: The confirmed strike on the Feodosia Oil Depot represents a significant, immediate degradation of RF fuel sustainment capabilities for the Southern Front (Crimea, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson). This may force RF to rely on more vulnerable rail and road networks for fuel resupply from mainland Russia. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 remains capable of coordinating localized attritional fire (Donetsk). However, the UAF deep strike on Feodosia suggests RF air/maritime defenses around critical logistical assets in Crimea remain vulnerable to UAF long-range platforms.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF posture has shifted from reactive defense (Shahed engagement) to proactive interdiction (Feodosia strike). This demonstrates tactical initiative and the ability to project force deep into RF-controlled territory, directly challenging the RF's operational depth.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

CRITICAL SUCCESS: The deep strike on the Feodosia Oil Depot. This success validates UAF long-range strike capabilities and imposes direct logistical friction on the RF. SETBACK (LOCALIZED): Confirmed destruction of the Nova Poshta branch in Donetsk Oblast highlights the persisting vulnerability of civilian infrastructure to RF indirect fire.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

UAF must now anticipate an increase in RF retaliatory strikes targeting the systems used for the Feodosia attack (e.g., UAV launch sites, ISR platforms, C2 nodes). AD and electronic warfare (EW) assets must be prepared for this anticipated response.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO (Normalization/Morale): RF channels are attempting to project routine through general war updates (Rybar) and high-morale messaging (VDV salute). The objective is to downplay or distract from the significant blow to logistics in Feodosia.

UAF IO (Exploitation): The confirmed successful strike on Feodosia should be immediately leveraged by STRATCOM to boost national morale, demonstrate offensive capability, and counter the RF narrative of UAF logistical collapse.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

UAF morale will receive a significant boost from the Feodosia strike, which directly counters the anxiety generated by the previous multi-axis Shahed attacks and the attritional shelling of Kherson. Conversely, the destruction of the Nova Poshta branch reinforces local concerns regarding RF brutality against civilian infrastructure.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

No significant international or diplomatic developments impacting the current operational picture have been reported in this window.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Immediate Retaliatory Strikes (Next 6-12 hours): RF will launch focused, high-value cruise missile (e.g., Kalibr) or ballistic missile (Iskander) strikes targeting suspected UAF deep strike launch or C2 infrastructure (e.g., identified SOF safe houses, drone assembly sites, key logistical railheads). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

MLCOA 2: Sustained Attrition in the South/East: RF will maintain the high rate of attritional artillery shelling against Kherson and local civilian targets in Donetsk Oblast to sustain pressure and maximize resource fixation, following the previous MDCOA/MLCOA patterns. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Coordinated Massed Strike on Primary C2/Logistics (PERSISTING): The threat of a synchronized high-end missile strike targeting Kyiv/Dnipro remains the MDCOA. The Feodosia strike provides a clear trigger for RF escalation and potential mass retaliation while UAF AD resources are recovering from the Shahed wave. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

MDCOA 2: Limited Spoiling Attack in Kherson (PERSISTING): RF executes the predicted limited spoiling attack across the Dnipro River to exploit the UAF's operational focus on infrastructure protection and the psychological impact of sustained shelling. The Feodosia attack makes this more likely as RF seeks to regain tactical initiative. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize AD Readiness for Retaliation (OPERATIONAL):

   • Recommendation: Immediately place AD systems around key C2 nodes and known deep strike launch sites (MLCOA 1 targets) at maximum readiness (DEFCON 2). Mobile AD assets that engaged the Shahed wave must be rapidly refueled and repositioned for high-end cruise/ballistic missile defense. (Deadline: Next 3 hours)

2. Exploit Feodosia Logistical Deficit (OPERATIONAL):

   • Recommendation: Direct all kinetic assets supporting the Southern Operational Zone to increase interdiction fire missions against known or suspected RF fuel resupply convoys and rail links entering Kherson/Zaporizhzhia from Crimea. Maximize the tactical impact of the Feodosia strike.

3. Counter-Battery Focus on Kherson (TACTICAL):

   • Recommendation: Re-affirm the CRITICAL priority of suppressing RF artillery shelling of Kherson. Utilize all available counter-battery resources to deny the RF the ability to exploit the Southern axis (MDCOA 2) while UAF attention is drawn to the threat of deep retaliation strikes.

4. Strategic IO Amplification (STRATEGIC/IO):

   • Recommendation: STRATCOM must immediately disseminate confirmed footage and BDA of the Feodosia strike across all major channels. Use the narrative that UAF will not allow RF to conduct attritional attacks (Kherson/Donetsk) without severe, proportional consequences to RF logistical depth.

//END REPORT//