Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - RF MULTI-DOMAIN ATTRITION AND COUNTER-DELIVERY IO

TIME: 040600Z OCT 25 AOR: Eastern FLOT (Donetsk), Northern Axis (Chernihiv/Poltava), RF Deep Rear (Leningrad Oblast), Global Information Environment. REPORTING PERIOD: 040300Z OCT 25 – 040600Z OCT 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

(FACT - UAF Deep Strike): Ukrainian Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) assets successfully struck targets in Kirishi, Leningrad Oblast, RF (deep rear), resulting in a confirmed industrial zone fire (ASTRA, TASS). This represents a significant extension of UAF deep-strike reach and a direct challenge to RF strategic rear security, particularly targeting high-value industrial/energy sites.

(FACT - RF Kinetic Activity): Air Force (Повітряні Сили) confirm new launches of KAB glide bombs toward Donetsk Oblast (Eastern FLOT), sustaining the high-volume standoff strike campaign identified in the previous daily summary.

(FACT - RF UAV Activity): New waves of RF UAVs (likely Shahed variants) are confirmed:

• Northwest Chernihiv Oblast (Course: South-West).
• Northern Poltava Oblast (Course: West). This confirms the continuation of the kinetic oscillation strategy, targeting rear logistics and infrastructure in the Central and Northern Axes.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Nighttime and early morning conditions remain favorable for both RF deep-strike UAVs (Chernihiv, Poltava) and UAF deep-strike UAVs (Leningrad). Low visibility supports air penetration.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

(DISPOSITION - RF Strike Assets): RF maintains dispersed strike launch locations, enabling simultaneous deep strikes (UAVs) and standoff bombardment (KABs) across multiple axes. (DISPOSITION - UAF Deep Strike): The strike into Leningrad Oblast confirms UAF retention and effective employment of long-range, deep-strike assets, challenging RF air defense integration far from the FLOT.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - Standoff Attrition): RF retains the ability to execute simultaneous KAB and UAV strikes across the operational depth (Donetsk, Chernihiv, Poltava), pressuring UAF Air Defense (AD) responsiveness and exploiting the required dispersion of mobile AD assets. (INTENTION - IO Counter-Delivery): RF state media (TASS) is actively pushing a narrative that attempts to preempt future Western military aid decisions, specifically casting doubt on the likelihood of the US delivering long-range Tomahawk missiles, likely to manage domestic expectations and pressure Western decision-makers. (INTENTION - ZNPP Coercion (Sustained): ZNPP Director Chernichuk (TASS) publicly confirms the development of plans to bring blocks back online "when the country's leadership makes the appropriate decision." This maintains the underlying threat of deliberate nuclear escalation as a coercive tool.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

(Adaptation - IO Target Set): RF IO has rapidly pivoted to target specific, high-impact military aid decisions (Tomahawk delivery) rather than generic aid critiques. This shows an intelligence-led approach aimed at disrupting high-leverage UAF capability gains.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

The sustained volume of KAB and UAV use suggests that RF production/procurement of these munitions remains robust, despite UAF deep strikes aimed at disrupting the supply chain.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is demonstrating high synchronization by maintaining constant pressure on the FLOT (Donetsk KABs) while forcing UAF AD responses far to the north (Chernihiv/Poltava UAVs).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF Air Force units (Air Force) are maintaining accurate and rapid public communication regarding active threats, demonstrating high readiness in the kinetic decision cycle. However, the sustained need to track and engage numerous aerial threats across three major axes (Donetsk KABs, Chernihiv UAVs, Poltava UAVs) is taxing AD readiness.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Success (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The successful UAF UAV strike on an industrial zone in Kirishi, Leningrad Oblast, is a significant strategic success, demonstrating capability to strike high-value, deep-rear targets, disrupting RF economic and military industrial potential.

Setback (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): The sustained KAB strikes in Donetsk and the new UAV waves in Chernihiv/Poltava indicate UAF PVO is still being saturated and attrited, likely resulting in localized damage that is yet to be confirmed.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

The primary constraint remains the finite number of mobile SHORAD/EW systems required to defend high-value infrastructure across the extended operational depth (Chernihiv, Poltava, Dnipro) while also supporting FLOT defense (Donetsk).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

RF IO Objectives (MEDIUM INTENSITY - Targeted):

1. Undermine US Aid Decisions: TASS, citing American conservative media, actively pushes the narrative that Tomahawk delivery is unlikely due to the risk of "involving the US in direct conflict." This attempts to manage RF domestic narrative (denigrating the value of Western aid) and pressure US political decision-makers.
2. Project ZNPP Authority: TASS report on ZNPP operation plans projects an image of RF control and calculated restraint, reinforcing the use of ZNPP as a strategic bargaining chip.

UAF Strategic Communication Opportunity: The successful deep strike on Leningrad Oblast must be amplified strategically, showcasing UAF ability to impose costs on the RF military-industrial base, directly countering RF narratives of Ukrainian systemic collapse.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The successful strike deep into RF territory is a significant morale boost for UAF forces and the public. Conversely, the persistent threat of KABs in the East and UAVs in the North sustains public anxiety regarding infrastructure security.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The TASS focus on US/Tomahawk delivery suggests RF intelligence views this specific materiel as a high-risk factor, indicating the importance of continued UAF advocacy for its delivery.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Sustained Multi-Axis Air Attrition (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue to launch KABs at the Eastern FLOT (Donetsk) to support ground operations and maintain concurrent UAV strikes (Chernihiv/Poltava) to force AD dispersion. This pattern will continue for the next 12-24 hours.

MLCOA 2: IO Escalation against Strategic Aid (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF IO will intensify messaging regarding the Tomahawk delivery and other high-impact weapon systems to create political friction and delay decision-making in Washington and allied capitals.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Coordinated Deep Strike on Vulnerable C2/Logistics (HIGH THREAT, MEDIUM IMPACT) RF intelligence exploits the confirmed UAF AD focus on the North/Central axis (Chernihiv/Poltava) to launch a high-density strike package (UAVs and/or Ballistic Missiles) against a high-value C2 or logistics hub in Western Ukraine (e.g., Lviv, Khmelnytskyi), testing the operational readiness of long-range AD systems.

MDCOA 2: ZNPP Operational Status Change (MEDIUM THREAT, CATASTROPHIC IMPACT) RF C2 orders a preparatory or partial reactivation sequence at ZNPP to maximize political leverage during a period of high kinetic activity or IO push.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Execute Dynamic AD Prioritization (TACTICAL PRIORITY): Recommendation: Immediately shift priority from static infrastructure defense to the defense of mobile logistics columns and C2 nodes in Poltava and Chernihiv Oblasts, based on the current UAV trajectories. Utilize mobile EW assets to degrade UAV C2 links before they reach the target area.
2. Amplify Leningrad Strike Success (STRATCOM PRIORITY): Recommendation: UAF StratCom must rapidly create and disseminate a sophisticated public narrative centered on the Kirishi strike. Frame it as evidence of Ukraine's ability to hold RF strategic assets at risk, directly undermining RF claims of military success and bolstering domestic and international morale.
3. Counter-KAB Force Protection (OPERATIONAL PRIORITY): Recommendation: Due to confirmed continued KAB launches toward Donetsk, order all forward UAF units to maximize overhead cover, disperse C2 elements, and increase the use of decoys/camouflage to mitigate the devastating effect of standoff glide bombs. Task deep-strike assets (HIMARS, SCALP/Storm Shadow) to target known RF launch aircraft or forward airfields if the KAB origin is identified (CRITICAL CR #1 from previous summary).
4. Engage US Decision Makers on Tomahawk (DIPLOMATIC PRIORITY): Recommendation: UAF diplomatic and military attachés in Washington must engage immediately with relevant decision-makers and media to provide classified briefings detailing the necessity and low-risk profile of the proposed Tomahawk/long-range cruise missile capabilities, directly refuting the RF disinformation campaign cited by TASS.