Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - DEEP STRIKE DISPERSAL AND STRATEGIC IO COUNTER

TIME: 022130Z OCT 25 AOR: Central Ukraine (Kyiv, Vinnytsia, Sumy, Poltava, Khmelnytskyi, Zhytomyr Oblasts); Strategic Information Environment (Tomahawk, ZNPP). PERIOD: 022100Z OCT 25 – 022130Z OCT 25

ANALYST JUDGMENT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The Russian Federation (RF) is executing a widely dispersed One-Way Attack (OWA) UAV strike across five central and northern Oblasts, signaling a high-effort attempt to saturate and geographically extend Ukrainian Air Defense (PVO) coverage. The immediate tactical focus has shifted westward and northward from the previous Bila Tserkva vector, confirming the intent to interdict deep rear logistics and force critical PVO asset re-allocation. Concurrently, RF Information Operations (IO) are aggressively attempting to regain the initiative following UAF morale successes (POW exchange) by weaponizing the ZNPP power outage and leveraging anti-Ukrainian narratives (Myrotvorets).

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

(FACT - OWA UAV Dispersion):

• UAV detected approaching Poltava Oblast from Southern Sumy Oblast (2102Z). This is a new, eastern axis threat, likely targeting critical infrastructure or fuel storage.
• UAV confirmed tracking from Vinnytsia Oblast toward Khmelnytskyi Oblast (2103Z). This confirms the deep western vector identified in the previous SITREP. Khmelnytskyi is a crucial hub for Western military aid transit and a priority target.
• UAV confirmed tracking from Kyiv Oblast toward Zhytomyr Oblast (2112Z). This confirms the continued pressure on the Kyiv corridor and a push toward another major Western logistics route/military base area.
• Current air alert map (2121Z) confirms active threats across multiple central and northern regions.

JUDGMENT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The enemy's tactical objective is dispersal and resource exhaustion. By simultaneously striking five non-contiguous Oblasts (Sumy/Poltava, Kyiv/Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia/Khmelnytskyi), the RF is testing the operational agility and capacity limits of UAF mobile PVO units. The shift toward Khmelnytskyi and Zhytomyr highlights the focus on interdicting Western-sourced logistics.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

Night conditions continue to provide optimal cover for OWA UAV and FPV drone operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

(FACT): UAF Air Force Command (Povitriani Syly) is effectively tracking and communicating the rapid changes in UAV vectors, indicating sustained Command and Control (C2) effectiveness despite the dispersed threat.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(CAPABILITY - Multi-Axis Strike): RF capability to sustain simultaneous, coordinated OWA strikes across a 400km wide operational area is confirmed.

(INTENTION - Strategic Coercion via ZNPP): RF state media (TASS) and ZNPP communications directorate (2114Z) are aggressively executing the predicted IO campaign, framing the ZNPP power outage as "outright lies and information terrorism" by Kyiv. JUDGMENT (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The primary intention is to neutralize international pressure over the ZNPP crisis and shift blame back to Ukraine, thereby constraining UAF operational freedom in the Southern Operational Zone.

(INTENTION - Disrupt Western Aid Flow): The directed vectors toward Khmelnytskyi and Zhytomyr confirm the intent to degrade the final stages of Western logistics supply lines.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

The immediate abandonment of the Bila Tserkva vector (previously Priority 1 MLCOA) and the rapid shift to Khmelnytskyi/Zhytomyr suggest either a successful EW diversion by UAF forces or a deliberate feint by the RF to commit PVO assets to the Kyiv corridor before launching the true, deeper attack. This rapid vector change is a key operational adaptation.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

No new information on RF logistics. The continued ability to launch high-volume, dispersed OWA UAVs suggests robust forward arming and maintenance capabilities in launch zones (e.g., Kursk, Belgorod, Crimea).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

RF C2 is highly effective in synchronizing tactical strike operations (UAVs) with strategic political messaging (ZNPP denial, Tomahawk dissuasion, Myrotvorets narrative).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

UAF PVO units are highly mobilized and responding dynamically to the rapidly shifting threat vectors. The ability to track and communicate these shifts (Kyiv to Zhytomyr, Vinnytsia to Khmelnytskyi) is crucial.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

(STRATCOM SETBACK - Tomahawk): Internal media reports (RTRS sources via UAF channels, 2108Z) suggesting US delivery of Tomahawk missiles is "unlikely" directly undermine the strategic dissuasion efforts against RF's deep strike capabilities. This report risks reinforcing RF's narrative that its public escalation threats are effective.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

PVO Constraints: The necessity of covering five Oblasts simultaneously is drastically increasing the stress on limited mobile PVO and EW reserves. The UAF must prioritize the defense of the Khmelnytskyi/Zhytomyr logistics corridor over less critical infrastructure in the Sumy/Poltava axis.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF ZNPP Denial: RF official sources are in a full-spectrum denial campaign regarding the ZNPP power outage, attempting to preempt international condemnation.
• "Extremist Children" Narrative (TASS, 2100Z): RF state media launched a highly emotive, low-effort disinformation campaign claiming Ukrainian sites (Myrotvorets) list Russian children. This is designed for domestic consumption and to justify future RF actions by dehumanizing the UAF/Ukrainian state.
• Shadow Fleet Tension: Macron's announced meeting of European Chiefs of Staff (2102Z) regarding the detained "shadow fleet" tanker indicates RF sanctions evasion and maritime IO efforts are creating tangible friction within NATO/EU, aligning with RF's long-term goal of weakening coalition cohesion.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

The combined effect of widespread air alerts and the persistent ZNPP crisis is likely eroding the recent morale boost gained from the POW exchange, requiring sustained STRATCOM effort.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

The RTRS report regarding the Tomahawk likelihood (2108Z) indicates ongoing internal policy debates in Washington are being successfully influenced, possibly by RF political messaging, aligning with the intent identified in the previous SITREP.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Kinetic Strike on Western Logistics Nodes (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF OWA UAVs currently tracking toward Khmelnytskyi and Zhytomyr will attempt to strike major rail junctions, logistics hubs, or forward operating airfields within the next 1-4 hours. This maximizes the operational disruption for Western aid delivery.

MLCOA 2: Sustained ZNPP/Tomahawk IO Campaign (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue to leverage the ZNPP crisis denial and the perceived success of its Tomahawk dissuasion rhetoric to maintain strategic leverage and deter further advanced Western military aid deliveries.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Coordinated Precision Strike on Khmelnytskyi Airfield (SEVERE THREAT) Following the saturation UAV attack, RF commits a limited number of high-precision cruise missiles (e.g., Kalibr or Kh-101/555) against the Khmelnytskyi airfield or a critical regional PVO command node, exploiting the stretched defenses caused by the OWA UAV dispersal.

MDCOA 2: Escalated Ground Assault (PERSISTENT HIGH THREAT) RF attempts to leverage UAF resource diversion (PVO commitment, IO defense) to launch a limited but reinforced ground assault using high-value assets (BMPT-72s) on the Pokrovsk or Verbove axes to achieve a politically significant, albeit localized, breakthrough.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Re-prioritize PVO Deployment to Western Hubs (TACTICAL PRIORITY): Recommendation: Immediately shift the operational priority for all available SHORAD/MRSAM batteries (except those protecting Kyiv government core) toward the Khmelnytskyi and Zhytomyr military transit corridors. Use the Poltava vector as a secondary, EW-led defense zone.
2. Execute ZNPP Counter-Narrative Surge (STRATEGIC PRIORITY): Recommendation: Immediately launch a STRATCOM campaign that specifically counters the RF denial (TASS/ZNPP Director) by emphasizing the physical control RF forces maintain over the power lines and the plant itself. Frame the denial as evidence of deliberate nuclear blackmail.
3. Proactive Information Defense against "Myrotvorets" IO (IO PRIORITY): Recommendation: Prepare and disseminate a preemptive statement addressing the RF "children on Myrotvorets" narrative. The statement should denounce the claim as manufactured propaganda and reaffirm Ukrainian adherence to international law regarding minors, preventing the narrative from gaining traction in neutral media.

//END REPORT//