Situation Report

SITUATION REPORT (SITREP) - UAF DEFENSIVE

TIME: 301800Z SEP 25 AOR: Central (Dnipro), Eastern (Kharkiv, Luhansk/Zaporizhzhia), and Southern Axes PERIOD: 301730Z SEP 25 – 301800Z SEP 25 (Immediate Update)

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (IPB Step 1)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational tempo is dominated by heavy RF deep strike activity against Central and Eastern Ukrainian urban centers, coupled with persistent RF offensive actions focused on degrading UAF high-value assets (HVA) and C2 nodes.

• Central Axis (Dnipro):
  • Confirmed Damage (Fact): Multiple videos confirm extensive structural damage and large fires in Dnipro (Dnipropetrovsk), reportedly targeting a major building complex. SES/DSNS (Ukrainian State Emergency Service) assets are heavily engaged (1737Z).
  • RF Justification (Fact): RF military bloggers (Kotsnews, Arkhangel Spetsnaza) are synchronizing the narrative, immediately claiming the targets were "scam call centers" (1737Z, 1746Z), underscoring the ongoing Information Operation (IO) intended to justify civilian targeting.
• Eastern Axis (Kharkiv):
  • Confirmed Strike (Fact): RF forces conducted multiple UAV strikes (claimed "Geran") on Kharkiv city, resulting in significant fires and smoke (1735Z, 1755Z). Casualty status is unknown (1755Z).
  • Tactical Targeting (Fact): UAF 412th Regiment (Nemesis SBS) successfully detected and destroyed four RF self-propelled artillery systems (SAU), identified as North Korean "Koksan" systems (or Msta-S misidentified as Koksan in the field) in Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts (1741Z). This is a major success, degrading RF long-range fire capability.
• Northern Axis (Chernihiv):
  • RF Claimed Success (Fact): RF Grouping "Sever" claims the destruction of several UAF Temporary Deployment Points (PVD) near Prybyn, Chernihiv Oblast (1749Z). This suggests persistent RF reconnaissance and strike operations near the border.
• Southern Axis (Black Sea):
  • UAF Asset Loss (Fact): Turkish fishermen reportedly recovered a downed UAF Magura Maritime Unmanned Surface Vehicle (MUSV) in the Black Sea (1733Z). This is a confirmed loss of a high-value UAF offensive asset, though the cause (mechanical failure, RF countermeasure, or weather) is unknown.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors affecting Operations

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Clear weather across Central and Eastern Ukraine is facilitating persistent RF UAV and drone strikes (Dnipro, Kharkiv). Conversely, RF propaganda anticipates the onset of autumn rains, which they judge will reduce drone/copter effectiveness (2102Z, prior day).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF forces are successfully maintaining deep strike capabilities against high-value RF targets (4 x SAU destroyed in Luhansk/Zaporizhzhia). However, UAF Air Defense is demonstrably struggling to prevent RF deep penetration of UAVs into major urban centers (Dnipro, Kharkiv), confirming the previously identified constraint. RF forces continue to focus on localized tactical breakthroughs (Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiyske direction) utilizing air/drone superiority (1755Z).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (IPB Step 2)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) CAPABILITY (Coordinated Deep Strike): RF demonstrates the capability to execute simultaneous, multi-axis deep strikes using UAVs against major urban centers (Dnipro, Kharkiv) in Central and Eastern Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) INTENTION (Degrade Counter-Fire): RF continues its efforts to achieve localized fire superiority by systematically targeting UAF counter-battery radars (as noted in the previous daily report) and degrading UAF artillery systems (evidenced by the use of UAVs to strike targets, including a claimed Starlink terminal near the FLOT) (1755Z). (HIGH CONFIDENCE) INTENTION (Information Shape): The core RF intention remains the immediate and coordinated synchronization of kinetic strikes (Dnipro) with IO (claims of striking "call centers" and "UAV production") to normalize attacks on civilian infrastructure and minimize international backlash.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Integrated Targeting: RF operations are increasingly demonstrating integration between ISR (UAV/drone surveillance) and loitering munition/artillery assets to rapidly destroy UAF ground assets, including vehicles, C2 infrastructure (antennas, Starlink), and personnel near the FLOT (1755Z). (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Exploiting Mobility: RF forces continue to leverage combined arms in contested areas (Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiyske direction) to maintain pressure, potentially attempting to exploit the degradation of UAF counter-battery fire capability.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF maintains sufficient UAV and loitering munition stockpiles to sustain high-tempo deep strike operations against multiple urban centers simultaneously. The confirmed use of North Korean artillery systems (or systems identified as such) confirms the reliance on external materiel supply to maintain tube artillery capability (1741Z).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF C2 maintains high synchronization across kinetic operations and IO, achieving near-real-time justification narratives for strikes on civilian infrastructure.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (IPB Step 3)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF combat readiness remains high in the counter-fire domain, demonstrated by the successful elimination of four RF SAU systems by the 412th Regiment (1741Z). However, UAF Air Defense remains critically vulnerable to the expanding depth and volume of RF drone strikes in Central Ukraine.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Setbacks:

• HVA Loss (Fact): Confirmed loss of one UAF Magura MUSV in the Black Sea (1733Z).
• Urban Damage (Fact): Significant structural damage and casualties from deep strikes in Dnipro and Kharkiv.

Successes:

• Artillery Degradation (Fact): Destruction of 4 x RF SAU systems (Koksan/Msta-S) by UAF GUR/SBS units, significantly degrading enemy indirect fire capability on the Eastern/Southern axes (1741Z).
• Humanitarian Operation (Fact): GUR MO and MFA successfully evacuated 48 Ukrainian citizens from the Gaza Strip (1759Z), demonstrating successful execution of complex non-combat operations.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The persistent RF drone threat requires an immediate focus on distributing short-range air defense (SHORAD) systems to protect critical urban infrastructure and front-line units against loitering munitions, especially after the loss of the counter-battery radar. There is an urgent need to replace or rapidly repair MUSV assets lost in the Black Sea to maintain maritime pressure.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IPB Step 4)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF Primary Narrative (Justification): RF milbloggers are consistently and immediately framing strikes on civilian structures (Dnipro) as legitimate military targeting of "call centers" or "UAV production" (1737Z, 1746Z). This narrative is used to neutralize criticism of civilian casualties. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF Internal Narratives (Historical & Mobilization): RF narratives are focusing on historical revisionism (UPA/Soviet conflict 1702Z) and celebrating the annexation of "new territories" (1728Z) to reinforce domestic support and project military confidence ahead of anticipated ground operations.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Public morale in Central and Eastern cities remains under pressure due to continuous, large-scale deep strikes (Dnipro, Kharkiv). UAF STRATCOM must prioritize the immediate dissemination of the GUR/412th Regiment success (SAU destruction) to counter the negative psychological impact of the urban strikes.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) The previous report highlighted the critical political signaling from Hungary regarding drone shoot-downs. This new intelligence confirms RF attempts to exploit internal Western political divides (Trump on US shutdown, 1752Z) to undermine the continuity of Western military aid.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (IPB Step 5)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Sustained Deep Strike Tempo with IO Synchronization (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will maintain the current high operational tempo of simultaneous drone strikes against Kharkiv, Dnipro, and the Cherkasy-Vinnytsia corridor over the next 48 hours. Every strike on a civilian building will be immediately justified by RF IO channels as targeting "scam centers," military facilities, or UAV production sites.

MLCOA 2: Increased Pressure on Pokrovsk Axis (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF forces, particularly the "Otvazhnye" (Brave) grouping, will escalate ground assaults on the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiyske) direction, attempting to exploit the earlier successful neutralization of UAF counter-battery capability. Expect heavy use of loitering munitions, FPV drones, and close air support to target UAF trenches and C2 nodes (Starlink) (1755Z).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Coordinated Strike on Danube/Black Sea Ports (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Leveraging the intelligence gathered from the loss of the Magura MUSV, RF attempts a coordinated missile and UAV strike against remaining Black Sea or Danube logistical/grain export infrastructure, seeking to achieve strategic economic and logistical paralysis.

MDCOA 2: Escalation Near NATO Border (LOW CONFIDENCE, HIGH IMPACT) Following the SVR's "provocation" narrative (previous daily report) and the Hungarian drone statement, RF executes a major military incident near the Polish or Hungarian border, such as a deliberate UAV overflight violation or a near-miss attack on a Western-supplied logistics hub, designed to test NATO resolve and potentially draw immediate retaliatory action.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Reinforce Pokrovsk Counter-Battery: Immediately deploy all available Counter-Battery Radar (CBR) systems and highly mobile artillery units to the Pokrovsk/Krasnoarmiyske direction to suppress RF indirect fire and mitigate MLCOA 2.
2. Prioritize SHORAD Distribution: Initiate a rapid distribution program for all available SHORAD and MANPADS assets to urban defense units in Dnipro and Kharkiv, prioritizing perimeter defense against low-flying UAVs, given the confirmed high strike tempo.
3. Proactive IO/Refutation Campaign: Direct STRATCOM to immediately release all available evidence concerning the civilian nature of the Dnipro targets, using compelling visual evidence of SES operations and casualties, to aggressively counter the false RF "call center" narrative (CR 2).
4. Maritime Counter-Measures Review: Order a full review of all Magura MUSV operational protocols and EW countermeasures following the confirmed loss (1733Z) to prevent potential exploitation of technical vulnerabilities by RF forces.

//END REPORT//