Situation Report

TIME: 301230Z SEP 25

SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

AOR: Eastern Europe and Western RF Border Oblasts PERIOD: 290000Z SEP 25 – 301230Z SEP 25

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

The operational picture is characterized by simultaneous, intensive RF offensive maneuvers along the Eastern front (Lyman-Siversk, Pokrovsk) and continued deep-strike activity by UAF into RF territory. The most critical developing areas are the Lyman-Siversk Axis and the Zaporizhzhia/Dnipropetrovsk border.

• Lyman-Siversk Axis (Critical): RF claims the liberation of Shandryholove (290953Z SEP) and Kirovsk (291604Z SEP), with subsequent claims of freeing Seversk Maly (300935Z SEP). This indicates sustained, successful localized RF offensive operations aiming to secure the line between Lyman and Siversk, severely threatening UAF positions around Yampil and Drobysheve.
• Zaporizhzhia/Dnipropetrovsk Border (Critical): The claimed RF breakthrough at Verbove (4.5 km deep, storming ongoing) presents an acute operational threat, potentially unhinging UAF defensive lines near the junction of Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. UAF General Staff reports clashes near Stepove and Kamyanske (Orikhiv direction), suggesting RF is applying pressure across the entire sector.
• Dobropillia Salient (Stable/Contested): UAF confirms the ongoing counteroffensive, reporting the liberation of over 174 sq km and clearing over 194 sq km of RF saboteurs (291800Z SEP). This suggests UAF retains initiative in this sector, despite RF attempts to fix forces here.
• Deep Strike Operations (UAF): The confirmed successful strike on the Karachevsky Elektrodental Plant (Bryansk Oblast) on 29 SEP demonstrates persistent UAF deep-strike capability against RF military-industrial targets. RF reports shooting down 84 UAVs overnight (30 SEP) over various regions, illustrating the scale of RF territory penetration.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors

• No extreme weather is reported. Conditions favor continued ground operations, particularly use of tactical aviation (KABs) and persistent UAV/FPV activity reported by both sides (Dambiev, Kotsnews, Ministry of Defense Russia). Upcoming weather in Kharkiv Oblast is forecast to degrade (291044Z SEP), possibly impacting tactical aviation and ISR missions.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF Posture: UAF remains actively engaged in counteroffensive operations (Dobropillia) while scrambling to address new, severe RF threats in the Lyman-Siversk and Verbove areas. Anti-air assets were engaged over Kyiv (291549Z SEP) and successfully intercepted 5 drones over Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (300430Z SEP), highlighting dispersed defensive operations.
• RF Posture: RF forces are actively consolidating recent gains and pressing new offensives. RF MoD is highly publicizing successes on the Lyman axis. RF is maintaining a reactive air defense posture across border regions, with widespread flight restrictions (Kaluga, Tambov, Zhukovsky) and air danger alerts (Lipetsk) (Confirmed in previous report). RF is exploiting the current favorable political/information environment.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RF)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) CAPABILITY: RF maintains the capability to conduct simultaneous, locally successful offensive operations supported by sustained, coordinated air strikes (KAB, UAV) and artillery. The liberation claims on the Lyman-Siversk axis (Shandryholove, Kirovsk, Seversk Maly) are significant indicators of renewed operational momentum in this area, likely executed by elements of the Zapad and Yug Groups of Forces.

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) INTENTION: RF's immediate operational intention is to capitalize on the perceived breakthrough near Verbove and fully secure the Lyman-Siversk line. Strategically, RF seeks to generate multiple simultaneous crises (military and informational) to disperse UAF reserves and pressure Western commitment (Moldova, deep strikes).

Tactical Indicators:

• RF forces are utilizing ground robotic complexes for logistics (300715Z SEP, Narodnaya Militsiya DNR), indicating an adaptation to high FPV risk near the front.
• RF is heavily employing TOS-1A (291735Z SEP) and MLRS (300735Z SEP) to clear strongholds ahead of ground advances, particularly near Krasnoarmeysk and in Luhansk Oblast.
• RF claims the destruction of high-value UAF assets (AN/TPQ-48 radar, 36D6 radar, Bukovel REB station), suggesting effective long-range ISR/strike integration (Lancet/Orlan teams).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Aggressive Annexation Rhetoric: RF is dedicating significant military and political messaging to the third anniversary of the "reunification" (30 SEP), coinciding with military advances to reinforce the narrative of permanent control (MoD Russia, Kremlin News, Basurin o Glavnom).
• Counter-UAF Deep Strike: RF PVO operations are significantly dispersed and reactive, causing civil aviation disruption, but failing to stop large-scale UAV penetration (84 UAVs destroyed in one night). This highlights the continued asymmetry in air defense capacity vs. UAF low-cost penetration tactics.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

(MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF logistics remain stressed by UAF deep strikes, particularly following the Bryansk industrial strike. However, there are no immediate indicators of systemic logistical collapse impacting front-line operations.

• Internal RF Logistics: Ongoing domestic issues persist, including fuel shortages and price gouging in Crimea/Sevastopol (291033Z SEP, Mash na volne), partly mitigated by supply restrictions (30 liters limit).
• Occupied Territories Logistics: Rail transport remains active, with "Railways of Novorossiya" transporting over 15.6 million tons of cargo since the start of 2025 (301221Z SEP).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF C2 demonstrates effective tactical coordination, particularly along the Lyman-Siversk axis where multiple settlements have been claimed liberated in quick succession, indicating centralized planning and unified operational objectives (MoD Russia congratulating units). The rapid exploitation claimed at Verbove suggests effective, albeit localized, breakthrough management.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UAF)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF is demonstrating a high operational tempo in both defensive and offensive roles.

• Offensive Operations: The Dobropillia counteroffensive continues to yield results (174 sq km liberated, 194 sq km cleared of saboteurs, 291800Z SEP).
• Deep Strike Capability: UAF successfully demonstrated the sustained ability to hit strategic industrial targets within Bryansk (Karachevsky Plant).
• Tactical Resilience: UAF units, particularly specialized drone units (59th Brigade), are maintaining high kill-chain efficiency, including the destruction of an RF Mi-28/Mi-8 helicopter using an FPV drone (290737Z SEP, MADYAR).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

Successes:

• Confirmed deep strike on Karachevsky Plant (Bryansk).
• Confirmed shoot-down of RF helicopter (Mi-28/Mi-8) by 59th Brigade FPV team.
• Continued consolidation of gains in the Dobropillia salient.
• Successful interception of 5 UAVs over Dnipropetrovsk (300430Z SEP).

Setbacks/Developing Threats:

• Confirmed loss of Shandryholove and Kirovsk (RF MoD claims, corroborated by some OSINT channels).
• The unverified but critical RF breakthrough claim near Verbove threatens key defensive positions.
• RF continues systematic air strikes on critical civilian infrastructure (UAV attack on Synelnykivskyi district, Dnipropetrovsk; deadly drone strike on a family in Chernechchyna, Sumy Oblast, 301202Z SEP).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

(HIGH CONFIDENCE) Sustained long-range strike capability is highlighted as a priority by President Zelenskyy (290934Z SEP), focusing on domestic drone and missile production ("Technological Stavka"). UAF coordination with allies on regional air defense is prioritized, specifically addressing the recent drone penetration of Polish airspace (291305Z SEP). The reported consideration of deploying NATO air defense systems over Western Ukraine (301213Z SEP) signals a potential critical resource injection.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (IE)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• Moldova Election Exploitation (CRITICAL): RF is actively exploiting the narrative that pro-Russian opposition parties won the Moldovan elections (TASS narrative inversion from previous report). This is a focused effort to delegitimize the current pro-European government, increase internal instability, and open a potential pressure point on Ukraine's southwestern flank.
• Narrative of Success: RF official and milblogger sources are heavily promoting the "liberation" of Shandryholove, Kirovsk, and Seversk Maly, linking these military gains to the celebration of the "Day of Reunification" (30 SEP) to bolster domestic morale and validate annexation.
• Counter-War Crimes Narrative: RF propaganda continues to push the narrative of "humane militia" actions (DPR advisor Kimakovsky, previously reported) to counter international accusations of war crimes.
• Western Fear Amplification: RF sources (e.g., Kotsnews, Poddubny) are amplifying reports of potential Swedish Gripen fighter jet transfers and the hypothetical transfer of Tomahawk missiles to generate fear of escalation and question Western resolve.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• UAF Support: UAF domestic morale remains high, driven by the Dobropillia counteroffensive and successful deep strikes. Public focus is on casualty management and civilian protection (Coordination Staff meetings, reporting of civilian casualties in Dnipropetrovsk, Sumy).
• RF Domestic Strain: Reports from Russian opposition channels (Mobilizatsiya) emphasize high casualty rates ("places ending in cemeteries"), criminal recruitment, and mandatory electronic conscription (Moscow, Mari El, Ryazan, Sakhalin Oblasts), indicating persistent morale and manpower issues despite official optimism.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• NATO/EU Integration Focus: Zelenskyy emphasizes unity as "weapon number one" (291305Z SEP) and confirms successful screening of Ukrainian legislation for EU accession (301221Z SEP).
• Regional Air Defense Discussions (NEW): Reports suggest NATO is considering deploying air defense systems over Western Ukraine to intercept RF drones and missiles (301213Z SEP). This, if confirmed, would be a major shift in NATO direct involvement.
• International Condemnation/Diplomatic Pressure: Czechia banning entry for Russian diplomatic and service passport holders (301221Z SEP) signals continued sanctions and diplomatic isolation efforts.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (NEXT 24-72 HOURS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Exploitation on the Lyman-Siversk Axis (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF forces will consolidate gains at Shandryholove, Kirovsk, and Seversk Maly. The immediate operational goal will be the continued envelopment of Yampil (Lyman-Siversk area) and intensifying direct assaults on Drobysheve to force a UAF tactical withdrawal from the northern Donbas salient. This will be supported by high volumes of tube and rocket artillery.

MLCOA 2: Pressure Testing near Verbove (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF will commit additional tactical reserves (likely including armor) to verify and exploit the claimed 4.5 km breakthrough near Verbove (Zaporizhzhia/Dnipropetrovsk junction). The objective is likely a limited operational penetration to destabilize UAF defenses in the sector, forcing UAF to re-route critical reserves away from the Dobropillia counteroffensive.

MLCOA 3: Increased IO Campaign (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF state media will synchronize military "liberation" claims with celebratory "Reunification Day" narratives. Simultaneously, an intense, coordinated hybrid campaign will target Moldovan political stability and amplify narratives concerning Western escalation (Tomahawks/Gripens) to influence upcoming US and European political decisions.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Rapid Exploitation into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF successfully exploits the breakthrough near Verbove, committing a concentrated Operational-Strategic Reserve (OSR) echelon to drive rapidly northwards toward the strategic cities of Kryvyi Rih or Dnipro (or their logistics hubs). This large-scale penetration, supported by overwhelming air superiority (KABs), could critically compromise UAF operational depth in Southern Ukraine.

MDCOA 2: Coordinated Strategic Deep Strike (LOW CONFIDENCE) RF launches a synchronized deep strike combining cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and advanced UAVs against high-value targets, specifically targeting critical F-16 infrastructure (e.g., Starokostiantyniv airbase, maintenance depots) and central government C2 nodes in Kyiv/Lviv, possibly leveraging the current high visibility of the NATO air defense discussion as a pretext.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

---

INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

---

ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize Defense of Verbove/Dnipropetrovsk Flank: Immediately allocate available mobile reserves (e.g., mechanised/airmobile brigades) to reinforce the defensive sector near Verbove. Commanders must prepare coordinated counter-attacks to eliminate the claimed RF penetration and prevent MDCOA 1.
2. Strategic Shift Consideration for Lyman-Siversk: Assess the risk of full operational collapse in the Lyman-Siversk area. If RF claims of capturing Shandryholove and Kirovsk are confirmed, commanders must decide whether to reinforce the remaining UAF salient (e.g., Yampil) or plan a phased, controlled withdrawal to more defensible terrain to conserve combat power.
3. Initiate Counter-IO for Moldova: Direct STRATCOM and diplomatic channels to immediately launch a coordinated informational defense campaign (partnering with EU/Moldova) to expose and mitigate RF hybrid exploitation of the Moldovan election results (MLCOA 3).
4. Targeted Exploitation of RF Air Defense Stress: Task operational planners to immediately analyze the geographic and temporal patterns of RF air defense hyperactivity (airport closures/alerts) to identify and exploit predictable vulnerabilities for future deep-strike targeting cycles.
5. Accelerate Regional Air Defense Dialogue: Leverage reports of potential NATO AD deployment over Western Ukraine to press allies for concrete commitments and timelines, prioritizing systems that can immediately enhance air defense over critical logistics hubs in Western and Central Ukraine.

//END REPORT//