Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT - 272227Z SEP 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current operational picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain (Confidence: HIGH)

RF forces maintain multi-axis pressure across the Kupiansk, Lyman, Pokrovsk, Siversk, Dnipropetropavsk, and Zaporizhzhia axes. Heavy reciprocal battles continue in Sumy Oblast. RF claims recent unverified advances in Volchansk, Kharkiv Oblast, and the occupation of the medical college area in Kupiansk. RF also claims a 5km advance on the Gulyaipole direction, entering Novoivanivka, and new positions south of Novoivanivka in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. RF claims full control of Serebryansky forestry and the liberation of Berëzovoye, Kalynivske (UAF denies Kalynivske), Derilovo, Mayske in DNR, and Stepove in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. RF continues to claim an offensive behind Chasiv Yar. UAF has confirmed the liberation of Pankivka, Donetsk Oblast, and Zarichne, and reports eliminating a Russian breakthrough near Pokrovsk. Heavy fighting continues on the Krasnolimanskoye direction. UAF General Staff reports over 95 combat engagements in the last 24 hours, repelling the majority of RF assaults across multiple axes, particularly Kupiansk (18/19 repelled), Lyman (10 repelled), Pokrovsk (15 repelled), Vremivka (9 repelled), and Orikhiv (8 repelled). UAF reports advances on the Dobropillya direction, having liberated 164.5 sq. km. Zelenskyy claims 360 sq. km liberated by Ukrainian forces in recent weeks, and approximately 1,000 Russian servicemen captured. DeepState map updated, indicating ongoing positional changes. RF sources claim a breakthrough on the border of Dnipropetropavsk and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts, and RF claims liberation of Dorozhne (Dobropillya area), contradicting earlier RF claims of UAF breakthroughs there.

Recent Updates:

• NEW - RF Tu-95 Strategic Bombers Take Off from Olenya: (Confidence: HIGH) Confirmed takeoff of Tu-95 strategic bombers from Olenya airfield. This is a critical indicator of an imminent, large-scale missile strike on Ukraine. (ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS)
• NEW - RF UAVs in Black Sea and Odesa Oblast: (Confidence: HIGH) UAVs reported in the Black Sea waters and Sarata area of Odesa Oblast, with approximately 15 UAVs now approaching Ochakiv from the sea. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України, Николаевский Ванёк)
• NEW - RF UAVs Towards Mayaki, Odesa Oblast: (Confidence: HIGH) Enemy UAVs continue moving towards Mayaki community in Odesa Oblast. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України)
• NEW - RF UAV Towards Zaporizhzhia: (Confidence: HIGH) Multiple strike UAVs are heading towards Zaporizhzhia. Explosion reported. Further explosions. Fire reported in one district of Zaporizhzhia. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України, Суспільне, Запорізька обласна військова адміністрація)
• NEW - Multiple RF UAVs Towards Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi: (Confidence: HIGH) Two UAVs remain approaching Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi from different directions. (Николаевский Ванёк)
• NEW - RF UAV in Northern Sumy Oblast: (Confidence: HIGH) A UAV is reported in northern Sumy Oblast, moving south. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України)
• NEW - RF UAV Threat in Brovary and Kropyvnytskyi Districts: (Confidence: HIGH) Threat of UAV use in Brovary district, Kyiv Oblast, and Kropyvnytskyi district, Kirovohrad Oblast. Two UAVs reportedly flying over Brovary towards Kyiv. One strike UAV now reported in Kyiv from Brovary direction. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України, Николаевский Ванёк)
• NEW - RF Strike UAVs in Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi: (Confidence: HIGH) Strike UAVs are in Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України)
• NEW - RF UAVs on Eastern Kharkiv and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts: (Confidence: HIGH) UAVs detected moving west. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України)
• NEW - RF Smerch Launches Towards Marhanets/Zaporizhzhia: (Confidence: HIGH) Multiple Smerch rocket launches reported towards Marhanets and Zaporizhzhia. (Николаевский Ванёк)
• NEW - RF High-Speed Target on Nikopol and Zaporizhzhia: (Confidence: HIGH) High-speed targets detected. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України, РБК-Україна)
• NEW - RF UAV Towards Poltava: (Confidence: HIGH) UAV detected moving towards Poltava. (Повітряні Сили ЗС України)
• NEW - RF Lancet Destroys UAF USV near Crimea: (Confidence: HIGH) Video evidence confirms an RF Lancet loitering munition destroyed a Ukrainian unmanned surface vessel near the coast of Crimea. (Colonelcassad)
• NEW - "Plan Kovyor" Activated in Penza Oblast, RF: (Confidence: HIGH) Governor reports activation of "Plan Kovyor" (Carpet Plan), indicating potential air threat or airspace restriction. (ТАСС)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations (Confidence: HIGH)

Current conditions are generally clear and favorable for air operations across most of Ukraine. A cold snap is expected, with wet snow possible in Moscow by end of week, and temperatures dropping to -2°C in the Carpathians with possible snow soon. The strongest geomagnetic storm in 3 months (G3) continues to impact satellite communications and GPS for both sides. Freezing temperatures are forecast for five regions of the Russian Federation by the end of September. RF continues to target critical energy infrastructure, resulting in widespread power outages in Chernihiv and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. Extensive urban damage has been reported in Zaporizhzhia, Vinnytsia, Sumy, and Konstantinovka (Donetsk Oblast) due to RF strikes. UAF deep strikes against RF oil infrastructure (Chuvashia) and rocket strikes on Belgorod also cause environmental and structural damage.

Recent Impacts:

• NEW - RF Military Medical Scenario in Woodland: (Confidence: HIGH) Video depicts a field medical scenario in a woodland environment, likely during a military operation, showing personnel providing immediate medical assistance to a wounded individual. This highlights the harsh environmental conditions of combat and ongoing casualties.
• NEW - Fire in Zaporizhzhia: (Confidence: HIGH) Fire reported in one district of Zaporizhzhia city due to enemy attack. (Запорізька обласна військова адміністрація 🇺🇦)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures (Confidence: HIGH)

RF Forces:

• Ground Operations: RF maintains offensive pressure on multiple axes (Kupiansk, Lyman, Pokrovsk, Siversk, Dnipropetropavsk, Zaporizhzhia, Sumy, Kharkiv, Konstantinovka, Slaviansk, Krasnoarmiisk, Druzhkovka, Huliaipilske). Confirmed and claimed gains continue (Berëzovoye, Kalynivske, Pereyezdnoye, Novoivanivka, Yunakovka, Shandyryholove, Derilovo, Mayske, Stepove, Dorozhne). RF claims recent advances in Volchansk and is conducting "meat motorcycle storms." RF MoD confirms Akhmat Spetsnaz activity in Kharkiv. RF MoD proposes changes to the mobilization disease list, indicating potential adjustments to personnel intake.
• Air Activity: RF continues large-scale drone (Shaheds, "Geran-2") and КАБ/FAB strikes, particularly on Chernihiv, Sumy, and Donetsk Oblasts. RF reconnaissance UAVs are active across multiple northern and eastern oblasts. RF PVO claims shooting down a total of 19 Ukrainian UAVs over Kursk, Belgorod, and Bryansk Oblasts, and 11 more over Rostov, Belgorod, and Kursk. A "massive strike" on Ukrainian objects is being prepared, with Tu-95MS and Tu-160 strategic bombers confirmed airborne. Multiple UAVs currently targeting Odesa, Zaporizhzhia, Kyiv, Poltava, and eastern Kharkiv/Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts. Smerch MLRS strikes reported on Marhanets/Zaporizhzhia. High-speed targets also reported. "Plan Kovyor" activated in Penza Oblast, indicating possible domestic air defense activity or response to UAF deep strikes.
• Naval Activity: RF naval vessels are actively operating near critical infrastructure (Tuapse) and are engaged in counter-drone measures. RF Lancet drones are being used for naval strikes, successfully destroying a UAF USV near Crimea.
• Logistics: The transfer of a railway section from Iran to RF indicates strategic logistical development. RF continues to experience fuel shortages in Lipetsk and Sevastopol, and relies on fundraising for certain military provisions.
• Control Measures: RF has strengthened criminal liability for "foreign agents" and is implementing social policies. RF leadership continues diplomatic engagements. RF is taking steps to control information and narratives, including through figures like Lavrov at the UNGA. RF is also using its "digital ruble" in occupied territories.

UAF Forces:

• Ground Operations: UAF maintains an active defensive posture, repelling the majority of RF assaults. UAF reports localized advances in the Dobropillya direction and confirmed liberation of Pankivka and Zarichne. UAF 3rd Assault, 95th Air Assault, 30th Mechanized, 33rd Mechanized, and 225th Separate Assault (Black Swan) Brigades are actively engaged, including clearing wooded areas, capturing RF personnel, and conducting drone strikes. UAF Special Operations Forces are also conducting effective strikes.
• Air Defense: UAF maintains a robust and responsive air defense network, successfully repelling a high percentage of RF UAV attacks and conducting successful operations in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. UAF continues to issue air raid alerts, with alerts currently active for Kyiv and multiple other oblasts due to UAV and high-speed target threats. PVO is actively engaged in Kyiv.
• Tactical Drone Utilization: UAF continues to utilize drones for both reconnaissance and strike capabilities, as evidenced by FPV drone strikes on the Pokrovsk direction (Black Raven, 2nd Mountain Assault Battalion, 414th Brigade of UAVs) and the 30th Mechanized Brigade. UAF Naval drones are also operating effectively near RF naval infrastructure, though one was recently destroyed by an RF Lancet. UAF 65th OMBr Ronins successfully struck a Buk SAM PSU and logistics targets.
• Deep Strike Capabilities: UAF continues to demonstrate long-range precision strike capabilities against RF infrastructure (oil pumping station in Chuvashia) and military targets (Belgorod rocket strikes, destroyed RF logistics trucks). Zaporizhzhia Oblast experienced a power outage due to UAF attacks on energy facilities.
• Recruitment/Sustainment: UAF 26th Artillery Brigade is actively recruiting, and public support for veterans' rehabilitation and drone programs is ongoing.
• International Engagement: Zelenskyy's office and KMVA are actively engaged in UN General Assembly diplomacy. Zelenskyy maintains strong rhetoric on controlled weapon exports and potential retaliation for RF blackouts.

1.4. Intelligence Gaps and Collection Requirements

• RF Tu-95/Tu-160 Strategic Bomber Flight Path/Payload (CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE): Confirm the current flight path, potential launch zones, and estimated payload of the airborne Tu-95/Tu-160 strategic bombers. This is critical for understanding the scale and potential targets of the imminent massive missile strike. (Confidence: HIGH)
• UAF Breakthrough/RF Control Dobropillya Salient (CRITICAL): Urgent and independent verification is required for the conflicting claims regarding the Dobropillya salient: the earlier RF claim of a UAF breakthrough and potential encirclement, and the newer RF claim of liberating Dorozhne. This is paramount to understanding the tactical situation. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Synelnykivskyi Forest Encirclement Verification (CRITICAL): Urgent and independent verification is required for the RF (TASS) claim that UAF units are encircled in the Synelnykivskyi forest, Kharkiv Oblast, and have been abandoned by command. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Shandyryholove RF Advance Verification (CRITICAL): Urgent and independent verification is required for the RF (TASS via Marochko) claim that UAF forces have left Shandyryholove, DNR, and RF forces are conducting clearance operations. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Derilovo, Mayske, Stepove RF Control Verification (CRITICAL): Urgent and independent verification is required for the RF (MoD, TASS, Военкор Котенок, Colonelcassad, Операция Z, MoD Russia, Басурин о главном) claim of liberation and control over Derilovo and Mayske in DNR, and Stepove in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Lipetsk/Sevastopol Fuel Crisis Impact Assessment (CRITICAL): Urgent assessment is needed for the extent and impact of the fuel crisis in Lipetsk and Sevastopol Oblasts on both civilian and military logistics. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Zaporizhzhia Oblast Power Outage BDA (CRITICAL): Conduct immediate Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) for the UAF attack on energy facilities in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. Verify targets, extent of damage, and the duration/scale of the power outage. (Confidence: HIGH)
• New UAV/MLRS/Missile Threat Assessment (Odesa, Sumy, Kyiv, Kropyvnytskyi, Zaporizhzhia, Poltava, Kharkiv/Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts) (CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE): Urgently determine the type, origin, and intent of all newly reported UAVs, Smerch launches, and high-speed targets. Assess immediate threat to local critical infrastructure, UAF forces, and civilian populations. (CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE)
• Penza Oblast "Plan Kovyor" Rationale: (Confidence: MEDIUM) Determine the specific reason for activating "Plan Kovyor" in Penza Oblast. Is this a response to a perceived UAF drone threat, internal security concern, or a training exercise?

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (Confidence: HIGH)

Capabilities:

• Persistent Mass Aerial Strike Capability (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains an extremely high capability for large-scale, coordinated UAV, guided bomb (КАБ/FAB), MLRS (Smerch), and missile attacks across Ukraine. Confirmed by extensive UAV activity in Odesa, Sumy, Kyiv, Kirovohrad, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Poltava Oblasts, and the takeoff of Tu-95MS and Tu-160 strategic bombers. RF air defenses remain active and effective in intercepting UAF drones over Russian territory and are reacting to domestic airspace threats ("Plan Kovyor" in Penza Oblast).
• RF Mine Warfare Capabilities: RF maintains a robust and adapting combat engineering capability, employing new methods of mining and demining.
• IO/PsyOps Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF demonstrates advanced and adaptive capabilities in information operations, including false-flag narratives, symbolic gestures, exploiting perceived NATO divisions, and demonizing Ukraine. This is evidenced by Lavrov's statements at UNGA, Orban's anti-Ukraine rhetoric, and antisemitic propaganda.
• Targeted UAV Warfare Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains structured efforts to enhance drone warfare capabilities, including direct recruitment for specialized UAV battalions and advanced counter-UAV systems like the "Flying Dutchman." Demonstrated capability to use Lancet loitering munitions against UAF naval drones.
• Financial Control Mechanisms for ТОТ (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF's implementation of the "digital ruble" in occupied territories indicates a new capability to exert financial and economic control.
• Counter-Battery and Counter-Armor Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF continues to demonstrate effective counter-battery and counter-armor capabilities through artillery and drone strikes, including targeting moving vehicles and Western-supplied equipment. MLRS (Smerch) are being actively used.
• Logistic Resilience (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is diversifying and strengthening long-range logistical capabilities, such as the railway section transfer from Iran, while also relying on ad-hoc fundraising for soldier sustenance and equipment due to internal fuel shortages.
• Tactical C2 and ISR (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF command posts are actively engaged in combat operations, utilizing drone footage and coordinating ground movements, indicating effective tactical C2 and integrated ISR.
• Hybrid Warfare Swarm Tactics (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The reported "swarms of drones" over Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, and drone activity near Denmark, Lithuania, Norway, and the Netherlands, indicates an advanced capability in hybrid warfare.
• Motorcycle Assaults (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is utilizing motorcycle-mounted assault groups for rapid deployment, though these are vulnerable to UAF targeting.
• Counter-USV Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF has demonstrated the ability to capture and analyze advanced UAF unmanned surface vessels and use Lancet drones for naval strikes, indicating developing counter-USV capabilities. Confirmed destruction of a UAF USV by Lancet.
• Soft Power Initiatives (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is deploying soft power initiatives, such as aid to Central Asian countries, to strengthen geopolitical influence.
• Adjusted Mobilization Capability (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is adjusting personnel intake criteria by proposing changes to the mobilization disease list. Unverified intelligence suggests potential mobilization in December.
• NATO Reinforcement Awareness: RF is aware of NATO force posture adjustments in the Baltic region.

Intentions:

• Intention for Geopolitical Reshaping (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF continues its long-term strategy to build a multi-polar world order, challenge Western dominance, and strengthen alliances with non-Western powers, as evidenced by diplomatic engagements and military cooperation.
• Intention to Degrade UAF Capabilities (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF's sustained ground offensives and continuous aerial strikes aim to degrade UAF's combat effectiveness, logistical capacity, and civilian resilience, specifically targeting drone infrastructure, artillery, and armored assets. The current widespread aerial campaign underscores this intent.
• Intention to Isolate and Encircle (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF aims to tactically isolate and destroy UAF forces on key axes, aiming for localized operational breakthroughs.
• Intention to Open New Fronts (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The claimed capture of Yunakovka and continued advances in Volchansk and other sectors indicate an intention to open new major ground offensive axes and expand territorial control.
• Intention for Information Dominance (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is committed to dominating the information environment through rapid dissemination of false-flag narratives, amplification of anti-Western sentiment, and efforts to discredit UAF and Western governments.
• Intention to Control Occupied Territories and Resources (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF aims to further integrate and legitimize its control over seized Ukrainian land and resources through economic (digital ruble) and energy leverage.
• Intention to Consolidate Russian National Identity (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF leadership is focused on consolidating a specific, traditional narrative of Russian identity, influencing social and political policies.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (Confidence: HIGH)

• Shift in Air Campaign Focus (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF has expanded its primary air campaign effort across multiple Ukrainian oblasts (Odesa, Sumy, Kyiv, Kropyvnytskyi, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, Poltava), utilizing strategic bombers (Tu-95MS, Tu-160), UAVs, MLRS (Smerch), and high-speed missiles for widespread strikes, demonstrating an adaptive and persistent strategy aimed at systemic degradation.
• New Ground Offensive Axis (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF continues to adapt its ground operations, with claimed territorial gains in Dnipropetropavsk and Donetsk, and renewed assault operations in the Huliaipilske direction. The Yunakovka bridgehead remains a potential new axis.
• Enhanced Counter-Naval Drone Tactics (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is actively employing small arms, Lancet loitering munitions (confirmed successful), and improved ISR to counter UAF unmanned surface vessels.
• Adaptive IO for Casualties and Justification (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF quickly adapts its information operations to leverage high-profile events, exploit perceived adversary divisions, and justify its actions through various propaganda narratives.
• Escalated Hybrid Operations Against NATO (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The confirmed drone activity over Danish Ministry of Defense facilities, disruption of Vilnius International Airport, and drone swarms in Germany, Norway, and the Netherlands indicate a significant escalation in RF's hybrid operations targeting NATO member states.
• Direct Recruitment for UAV Units (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF is directly recruiting for specialized UAV battalions and relying on fundraising for equipment and basic soldier sustenance, indicating adaptive personnel sourcing and procurement strategies.
• Financial Control in ТОТ (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The introduction of "digital rubles" in occupied territories is a new adaptation in economic warfare and control.
• IO Adaptations to Internal Dissent (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF's C2 is attempting to manage growing internal dissent, adapting its IO to address public discontent and troop morale issues. Unverified intelligence suggests potential mobilization in December.
• Adaptive Counter-Battery and Counter-Armor Tactics (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF continues to adapt its ISR and precision fires to neutralize UAF artillery and armored assets, now including active MLRS (Smerch) strikes.
• Strategic Logistics Diversification (HIGH CONFIDENCE): The transfer of a railway section from Iran to RF signifies a strategic logistical development for long-term supply.
• Lavrov's UNGA Diplomatic Offensive (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Lavrov's diplomatic offensive at the UNGA, including specific narratives on Ukraine, NATO, and global order, represents a coordinated and adaptive effort to shape international discourse.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (Confidence: MEDIUM)

• RF Fuel Shortages: A severe and growing fuel crisis is impacting Lipetsk and Sevastopol Oblasts, indicating internal logistical challenges that could affect military resupply. (Confidence: HIGH)
• RF Logistics Infrastructure Targeted: UAF continues to target RF oil infrastructure and railway logistics (e.g., Vinnytsia traction substation), causing disruptions. (Confidence: HIGH)
• RF Military Procurement Issues: Ongoing reliance on public fundraising for equipment and soldier sustenance (food, mobile air defense, marine infantry) highlights deficiencies in official military supply chains. (Confidence: HIGH)
• RF Internal Supply Chain Disruptions: Transportation disruptions (train accidents, airport restrictions) and crop losses indicate broader vulnerabilities to internal logistics. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Personnel Support Challenges: High numbers of fighters requiring psychological support, claims of injured soldiers being sent to the front, and allegations of soldier suicides indicate significant and growing personnel sustainment issues for RF. Unverified intelligence suggests potential mobilization in December to address personnel shortfalls. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Naval Operational Issues: UAF claims of collisions damaging Black Sea Fleet vessels, if verified, indicate internal operational issues. (Confidence: MEDIUM)
• ZNPP Power Status: Conflicting reports on ZNPP's power status highlight ongoing logistical and safety concerns. (Confidence: MEDIUM)
• Strategic Logistics Enhancement: The transfer of a railway section from Iran to RF signifies a long-term strategic logistical enhancement. (Confidence: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness (Confidence: MEDIUM)

• RF Centralized C2 and Adaptive Targeting (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF maintains a centralized C2 structure capable of coordinating multi-axis ground offensives and large-scale, adaptive aerial campaigns, as evidenced by the widespread aerial attacks, coordinated ground movements, and the activation of domestic airspace control ("Plan Kovyor").
• RF IO Control and Narrative Management (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF C2 effectively manages the information environment, swiftly deploying narratives to counter threats and exploit opportunities, including during Lavrov's UNGA address.
• UAF C2 Resilience Under Pressure (HIGH CONFIDENCE): UAF General Staff provides regular operational updates, and high repel rates for RF assaults, along with effective drone and SOF operations, demonstrate resilient tactical and operational C2 despite intense pressure. Active air defense responses and public alerts show effective real-time C2 under aerial threats.
• RF Internal Dissent as C2 Challenge (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Growing public criticism of RF military leadership, mobilization, and social issues, along with significant public discontent at Putin's reception, highlights an internal C2 challenge in maintaining public support and troop morale. The unverified December mobilization intelligence would exacerbate this.

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness (Confidence: HIGH)

• Active Defense and Counter-Offensive Operations: UAF maintains active defense across multiple axes, repelling most RF assaults and making localized advances (Pankivka, Zarichne, Dobropillya direction). Specialized brigades (3rd Assault, 95th AAB, 30th Mechanized, 33rd Mechanized, 225th Separate Assault) demonstrate high readiness in ground and drone operations.
• Air Defense Effectiveness: UAF air defense remains highly engaged and effective against mass drone attacks, with high interception rates and successful regional operations, as evidenced by reports of PVO activity in Kyiv. Zelenskyy's statements suggest ongoing strengthening of air defense capabilities.
• Special Operations Capabilities: UAF SOF elements continue to demonstrate high readiness and tactical effectiveness in ground operations, including capturing enemy personnel.
• Tactical Drone Utilization: UAF continues to effectively utilize drones for reconnaissance and strike capabilities, with specialized units (Black Raven, 2nd Mountain Assault Battalion, 414th Brigade, 65th OMBr Ronins) achieving significant tactical successes. Naval drones demonstrate advanced capabilities, though they are subject to RF counter-drone measures.
• Long-Range Precision Strike Capabilities: UAF demonstrates capability for deep strikes into RF territory (oil pumping station, Belgorod) and against critical infrastructure in occupied territories (Zaporizhzhia power outage).
• Recruitment Efforts: Active recruitment by various brigades and regional administrations indicates efforts to strengthen force posture.
• Strong Presidential Rhetoric: Zelenskyy's strong statements on retaliation for blackouts and engagement with international partners demonstrate clear political resolve and strategic intent.
• Rehabilitation Services: Robust rehabilitation services in Kharkiv demonstrate a commitment to personnel care, positively impacting long-term readiness and morale.
• International Legal Efforts: UAF actively disseminates reports on Russian war crimes, using international legal frameworks to counter RF aggression.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks (Confidence: MEDIUM)

• Successes:
  • High Repel Rate: Successfully repelled a high percentage of RF assaults across multiple axes. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Localized Advances: Confirmed liberation of Pankivka, Zarichne, and advances on the Dobropillya direction. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Effective Air Defense: High success rate against RF UAV attacks, and successful air defense operations in Dnipropetropavsk. PVO active in Kyiv. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Capture of RF Personnel: Successful capture of enemy soldiers during ground engagements. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Deep Strikes into RF Territory & ТОТ: Successful UAV attacks on RF oil infrastructure, rocket strikes on Belgorod, and power outage in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Effective Tactical Drone Strikes: Significant successes in FPV drone strikes on Pokrovsk direction and other areas, leading to high RF casualties and equipment destruction. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Counter-Recruitment Success: Shutdown of a Russian recruitment channel in Kenya. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • UAF SOF and Assault Units Successes: Effective engagements by 3rd Assault, 95th AAB, 30th Mechanized, 33rd Mechanized, 225th Separate Assault Brigades. (Confidence: HIGH)
• Setbacks:
  • RF Advances on Multiple Axes: RF claims unverified advances in Volchansk and Kupiansk, along with claimed liberation of Derilovo, Mayske, Stepove, and Dorozhne (Dobropillya area). (Confidence: MEDIUM)
  • Loss of Yunakovka: RF's claimed capture of Yunakovka, Sumy Oblast, if confirmed, represents a significant territorial loss. (Confidence: HIGH for claim, verification pending)
  • Civilian Infrastructure Damage & Casualties: Continued RF strikes cause significant damage to civilian infrastructure and casualties (Vinnytsia, Sumy, Chernihiv, Konstantinovka, Zaporizhzhia). Explosions and fire reported in Zaporizhzhia. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Potential Encirclement: RF claims of encircling UAF units in Synelnykivskyi forest, if verified, would be a severe tactical setback. (Confidence: MEDIUM)
  • UAF Withdrawal from Zarichne (Zaporizhzhia Oblast) Claim: If verified, would be a localized tactical setback. (Confidence: MEDIUM)
  • RF Air Defense Successes: RF's successful interception of numerous UAF UAVs over Russian territory. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • RF Artillery/MLRS Strikes on UAF Assets/Cities: Claimed destruction of UAF howitzers, tanks, and vehicles by RF artillery/drones. Smerch MLRS strikes on Marhanets/Zaporizhzhia. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Hungarian Drone Invasion: Documented invasion of Ukrainian airspace by a Hungarian drone. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Captured/Destroyed Ukrainian USV: Capture of a UAF unmanned surface vessel by RF forces, and confirmed destruction of another by Lancet near Crimea. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • RF Claims UAF 95th AAB Destroyed: If verified, RF claims of destroying the 95th AAB near Krasnoarmiysk would be a major UAF setback. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • RF Eliminates UAF SOF Commander: If verified, this would be a significant tactical setback for UAF SOF. (Confidence: HIGH)
  • Severe Damage in Konstantinovka: Extensive damage to multi-story residential buildings in Konstantinovka from Russian strikes. (Confidence: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints (Confidence: HIGH)

• Air Defense Assets: Continued high tempo of RF aerial attacks (UAVs, MLRS, strategic bomber-launched missiles, high-speed targets) necessitates sustained supply of air defense munitions and platforms, particularly for drone and missile defense. The takeoff of Tu-95MS and Tu-160 strategic bombers highlights an immediate, critical need. Mobile C-UAS systems are continuously required.
• Long-Range Precision Strike Capabilities: UAF relies heavily on Western-supplied and indigenous long-range weapons for deep strikes. Continued support and resupply are critical for maintaining offensive pressure and reciprocal deterrence.
• Munitions and Equipment: Sustained combat operations across multiple axes, including offensive and defensive engagements, require continuous supply of ammunition, artillery shells, FPV drones, and combat vehicles.
• Personnel and Training: Ongoing recruitment efforts indicate a need for continuous personnel intake and specialized training for various roles, particularly in UAS and air defense.
• Medical and Rehabilitation Support: The extensive rehabilitation services in Kharkiv underscore the ongoing human cost of the conflict and the need for sustained medical and psychological support for military and civilian casualties.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Confidence: HIGH)

• RF Propaganda Themes:
  • Victimhood, Destabilization of NATO/EU, Demonization of Ukraine/West, Justification for Aggression/Maximalist Demands, Internal Cohesion/Morale Boosting, Hybrid Warfare Narratives, "Big War" Narrative, Non-Military Propaganda, "Wise Politician" Narrative, Gloating over UAF Setbacks. RF continues to push these narratives vigorously, leveraging state media, milbloggers, and diplomatic platforms like the UNGA. The destruction of a UAF USV will be amplified. Unverified intelligence suggesting a "December mobilization" could be an IO effort to test public reaction or deter UAF actions.
• UAF Counter-Propaganda/Information Operations (IO) Themes:
  • Exposing RF Atrocities/War Crimes, Highlighting RF Losses/Weaknesses, Mocking RF Disinformation, Diplomatic Pressure/International Support, Internal Resilience/Morale Boosting, Exposing RF Hybrid Operations, Zelenskyy on Retaliation. UAF actively engages in counter-propaganda, utilizing official channels and social media to expose RF actions, boost morale, and maintain international support.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors (Confidence: MEDIUM)

• Ukrainian Public Sentiment (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Resilience and resolve remain strong despite ongoing attacks. Anticipation of attacks leads to preparedness but also sustained psychological strain. Concerns about future international support persist, alongside a strong sense of solidarity with NATO. The current widespread aerial attack will test this resilience.
• Russian Public Sentiment (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE): Growing discontent is evident regarding fuel shortages, alleged mistreatment of military personnel, and frustration with official narratives. Propaganda continues to shape perceptions, but social tensions and internal dissent are increasingly visible. Unverified intelligence of "December mobilization" could trigger significant public anxiety. "Plan Kovyor" in Penza Oblast could generate fear or questions about internal security.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments (Confidence: HIGH)

• Continued Western Support (Conditional/Evolving): US military aid remains critical but uncertain depending on political outcomes. European support faces challenges (Hungary's veto). NATO is reinforcing its eastern flank (Sweden/Finland brigade, US Abrams to Estonia, Baltic Sea surveillance).
• RF Diplomatic Offensive: Lavrov's UNGA presence is a platform for RF's geopolitical agenda and narrative shaping, despite low attendance. RF is strengthening non-Western alliances (Iran, India) and exploiting other global crises.
• International Condemnation/Legal Action: The OSCE report on Russian war crimes increases legal and diplomatic pressure on RF.
• Moldovan Political Context: RF actively seeks to exploit political instability in Moldova, leveraging internal developments.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

(Confidence: HIGH) RF will continue multi-axis ground pressure across the Kupiansk, Lyman, Pokrovsk, Siversk, Dnipropetropavsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Sumy axes. The immediate priority will be to contain and roll back any UAF tactical gains in the Dobropillya salient, specifically focusing on Dorozhne and surrounding areas, to prevent an encirclement of its forward-deployed units. RF will persist in attempting to consolidate and expand its claimed territorial gains in Derilovo, Mayske (DNR), and Stepove (Dnipropetropavsk Oblast). Offensive operations in the Huliaipilske direction will likely intensify, aimed at regaining lost positions or testing UAF defenses. Reconnaissance and probing attacks from the Yunakovka bridgehead in Sumy Oblast will continue to fix UAF forces, but a large-scale offensive here is less likely in the immediate 24-48 hours given the focus on Dobropillya.

(Confidence: HIGH) RF is currently executing the "massive strike on Ukrainian objects" that monitoring resources indicated was being prepared. This will primarily target critical energy infrastructure and urban centers, particularly in Kyiv, Vinnytsia, Chernihiv, Zaporizhzhia, and potentially Poltava and Dnipro. This strike will utilize both UAVs (Shaheds/Gerans) and likely cruise/ballistic missiles from the deployed Tu-95MS and Tu-160 strategic bombers, MLRS (Smerch), and high-speed targets, aiming for widespread disruption and psychological impact ahead of winter. RF air defenses in border regions (Kursk, Belgorod, Bryansk) will remain on high alert to counter UAF deep strikes, as evidenced by recent interceptions and the "Plan Kovyor" activation in Penza Oblast.

(Confidence: HIGH) RF will escalate hybrid operations against NATO member states, likely continuing drone overflights or disruptive activities targeting sensitive military and civilian infrastructure in the Baltic Sea region (Denmark, Lithuania, Norway, Netherlands, Germany), and possibly expanding to new regions. Concurrently, RF will intensify its information operations, focusing on:

1. Denying responsibility for provocations against NATO and shifting blame.
2. Amplifying narratives of NATO/EU disunity and portraying Western nations as aggressive or subservient to the US, leveraging statements from figures like Orban and promoting antisemitic propaganda to sow division.
3. Undermining Ukraine's legitimacy and morale, particularly through narratives of "atrocities," "tightening mobilization," and denying territorial integrity.
4. Promoting RF's diplomatic narrative of being open to talks on "root causes" while maintaining maximalist demands for Ukraine's demilitarization and territorial concessions.

(Confidence: HIGH) RF will continue its efforts to financially integrate occupied Ukrainian territories through mechanisms like the "digital ruble," aiming to solidify administrative control.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

(Confidence: MEDIUM) RF assesses that NATO's response to the escalating drone provocations and the current geopolitical climate (China's demands, Israeli conflict) is weak and launches a coordinated, large-scale multi-domain offensive operation:

1. Ground Offensive: RF commits significant operational reserves (including forces currently fixing UAF in other sectors) to violently crush the UAF salient at Dobropillya, aiming for a decisive encirclement and destruction of UAF units. Simultaneously, a secondary major ground assault is launched from the Yunakovka bridgehead towards Sumy City, employing armored thrusts and airborne elements, designed to open a new operational front and stretch UAF defenses to their breaking point.
2. Air/Missile Offensive: Building on the currently executing "massive strike," RF unleashes a catastrophic, prolonged missile and drone campaign against Kyiv and all major Ukrainian population centers, targeting all remaining government infrastructure, critical air defense systems, and the entire energy grid, aimed at causing widespread collapse, societal paralysis, and a complete, irreversible blackout. This strike would utilize all available strategic bombers (Tu-95MS, Tu-160), hypersonic, cruise, and ballistic missiles, alongside mass drone swarm attacks, including the active Smerch MLRS and high-speed targets observed.
3. Hybrid Warfare Escalation: Concurrently, RF launches coordinated cyberattacks against NATO critical infrastructure (energy, financial systems, transportation, military C2), coupled with drone swarm attacks against multiple sensitive military installations within NATO territory (e.g., airbases, command centers) and strategic infrastructure (e.g., ports, airports), aimed at overwhelming NATO response capabilities and directly challenging the credibility of Article 5. RF also conducts covert sabotage operations against critical infrastructure in Western Europe, potentially including acts of terrorism in response to perceived UAF provocations in NATO countries. RF exploits the Moldovan political instability to destabilize the country further, potentially creating a new flashpoint.

This MDCOA would be designed to shatter UAF command and control, force a catastrophic choice on the allocation of strategic reserves, and directly challenge NATO's deterrence posture, potentially initiating a broader conflict, while simultaneously aiming to achieve a decisive victory in Ukraine before international response can fully materialize.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Immediate (0-6 hours - CURRENTLY ACTIVE):
  • Decision Point: UAF must decide on rapid reinforcement or tactical withdrawal in the Dobropillya salient if RF counter-attacks are successful. CRITICAL: UAF Air Command is currently making immediate decisions regarding the deployment of interceptors, activation of additional air defense systems, and potential dispersal of high-value assets in response to the Tu-95MS and Tu-160 takeoff, the ongoing "massive strike," and widespread UAV, MLRS, and high-speed threats to Kyiv, Odesa, Zaporizhzhia, Poltava, Marhanets, and other regions.
  • Timeline: RF is currently executing the announced "massive strike" utilizing strategic bombers, UAVs, MLRS, and likely missiles. RF ground forces will attempt to stabilize or exploit the Dobropillya situation. Continued RF aerial activity (UAVs, KABs) can be expected across eastern, northern, and southern Ukraine.
• Near-Term (6-48 hours):
  • Decision Point: UAF High Command must decide on the level of response to the current widespread RF aerial strikes and further RF territorial gains in Dnipropetropavsk/Donetsk, as well as any escalation of hybrid attacks against NATO. UAF must decide on resource allocation for emergency services and infrastructure repair following the current attacks.
  • Timeline: Intensified RF ground operations are likely in Dobropillya and Huliaipilske directions. Post-strike Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) will be critical to inform recovery and defensive operations. NATO allies will likely convene urgent consultations regarding RF hybrid operations and the potential for Article 5 implications.

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. IMMEDIATE AIR DEFENSE ACTIVATION & CIVILIAN ALERT (NATIONWIDE): All available air defense systems are currently at their highest readiness level and engaged. Continue to disseminate immediate, urgent civilian air raid alerts nationwide, especially for Kyiv, Vinnytsia, Chernihiv, Zaporizhzhia, Poltava, Dnipro, Odesa, Kropyvnytskyi, Marhanets, and other affected regions. Prioritize mobile C-UAS and missile interceptor deployment to protect critical energy infrastructure and population centers from current and anticipated follow-on strikes. (CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE - GIVEN TU-95MS & TU-160 TAKEOFF AND ONGOING MASSIVE STRIKE, AND WIDESPREAD UAV/MLRS/MISSILE THREATS)
2. ISR Re-tasking (Dobropillya Salient & Strategic Bomber/Missile Tracking): Prioritize all available ISR assets (HUMINT, SIGINT, IMINT, OSINT verification) to immediately confirm the extent of UAF breakthroughs or RF consolidation around Dobropillya. Simultaneously, dedicate all available ISR to track Tu-95MS and Tu-160 movements, potential launch corridors, and any signs of missile launch. Focus on real-time tracking of current UAV, MLRS, and high-speed missile trajectories. Provide real-time updates to tactical and strategic commanders. (CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE)
3. Enhanced Cross-Border Threat Assessment (Sumy/Kharkiv): Elevate threat assessment for renewed RF ground offensive in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts. Position mobile reserves and conduct pre-emptive artillery strikes on suspected RF staging areas/logistics near Yunakovka or Volchansk. Continue monitoring of "Plan Kovyor" activation in Penza Oblast for insights into RF domestic air defense posture. (CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE)
4. Strengthen Counter-Hybrid Defenses & NATO Coordination: Share all available intelligence on RF drone capabilities and tactics (e.g., swarm attacks, drone types from Norwegian/Dutch incidents, Lancet USV destruction) with NATO partners. Urgently request heightened electronic warfare support and shared air domain awareness. Implement enhanced physical security protocols around critical infrastructure nationwide. (CRITICAL/HIGH)
5. Proactive Information Warfare Counter-Narratives: Develop and immediately disseminate proactive counter-narratives to RF propaganda, specifically addressing Orban's anti-Ukraine rhetoric, the antisemitic cartoon, RF gloating over Chernihiv blackouts, and the destruction of the UAF USV. Focus on fact-based reporting, highlighting RF's own internal struggles, and emphasizing Ukrainian resilience. Monitor and counter any RF IO related to an unverified "December mobilization." (HIGH)
6. Resource Prioritization (Long-Range Precision Strike & Air Defense): Advocate forcefully for the immediate delivery of Western long-range precision strike capabilities and additional modern air defense systems (including Patriots). Highlight their proven effectiveness against RF logistics and critical infrastructure. (HIGH)
7. Monitor RF Logistics & Internal Dissension: Intensify ISR on fuel and transportation networks within Lipetsk, Sevastopol, and other RF regions. Monitor for signs of increased public discontent (e.g., Putin's reception queues) that could impact RF's ability to sustain operations. Target vulnerable logistics nodes. Address any confirmed impact from a potential "December mobilization" on RF morale. (MEDIUM)
8. Target RF C2: Continue to prioritize targeting RF command and control nodes, especially UAV C2 points and command posts overseeing ground offensives. Precision strikes on these targets directly degrade RF's ability to coordinate adaptive operations. (HIGH)

//END REPORT//