Situation Report

SITUATION REPORT - 212049Z SEP 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current operational picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain (Confidence: HIGH)

RF forces maintain multi-axis pressure across the Kupiansk, Lyman, Pokrovsk, Siversk, Dnipropetropavsk, and Zaporizhzhia axes. Heavy reciprocal battles continue in Sumy Oblast. RF claims recent unverified advances in Volchansk, Kharkiv Oblast, and the occupation of the medical college area in Kupiansk, with military control and fortifications on the Velikoburlukskoye direction. RF also claims a 5km advance on the Gulyaipole direction, entering Novoivanivka, and new positions south of Novoivanivka in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. RF claims full control of Serebryansky forestry and the liberation of Berëzovoye in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast (CONFIRMED by RF MoD and DeepState). RF continues to claim an offensive behind Chasiv Yar. UAF has confirmed the liberation of Pankivka, Donetsk Oblast, and Zarichne, and reports eliminating a Russian breakthrough near Pokrovsk. Heavy fighting continues on the Krasnolimanskoye direction. UAF General Staff reports over 80 combat engagements in the last 24 hours, repelling the majority of RF assaults across multiple axes, particularly Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka.

Key Updates:

• Crimea (Yanila): RF MoD confirms 2 personnel killed and 15 wounded in a UAF drone attack on a sanatorium and school in Foros. A school in Foros, damaged by a UAF UAV, has shifted students to remote learning, and a fire of 80 sq. m. was extinguished. RF MoD declares the UAF attack on Crimea a "premeditated terrorist attack on civilian objects." (FACT, Операция Z, Военкор Котенок, Colonelcassad, ASTRA, ТАСС, Confidence: HIGH). Crimean prosecution has launched a hotline for citizens affected by the UAV attack in Yalta. (FACT, ТАСС, Confidence: HIGH).
• Lviv Oblast: Explosion reported near Lviv, damaging windows and vehicles. (FACT, РБК-Україна, Confidence: HIGH).
• Kharkiv Oblast: RF tactical aviation launches guided aerial bombs (КАБ) towards northern Kharkiv Oblast. (FACT, Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, РБК-Україна, Confidence: HIGH).
• Pokrovsk Direction: UAF 28th Mechanized Brigade artillery actively engaging RF targets near Konstantinovka (Pokrovsk axis). UAF SSO 144th Center 1st Detachment successfully cleared a depot building and captured nine RF soldiers on the Pokrovsk direction. (FACT, ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS, Confidence: HIGH).
• Chernihiv Oblast: RF UAVs reported north of Chernihiv, constantly changing direction. (FACT, Повітряні Силі ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Confidence: HIGH).
• Poltava Oblast: Four RF Shahed drones reported heading towards/through Poltava. (FACT, Николаевский Ванёк, Confidence: HIGH).
• Siversk Direction: UAF FPV drones successfully intercepted two Russian Lancet drones. (FACT, Оперативний ЗСУ, Confidence: HIGH).
• General Ground Operations: UAF FPV drones from 4th "Wormbusters" unit successfully liquidated two RF personnel. (FACT, Оперативний ЗСУ, Confidence: HIGH). RF unit "Sever V" is using thermal-equipped drones to hunt UAF infantry and disrupt counterattacks near Chasiv Yar. (FACT, Операция Z, Военкоры Русской Весны, Confidence: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations (Confidence: HIGH)

Current conditions are generally clear and favorable for air operations across most of Ukraine. A cold front is moving into the Carpathians with temperatures dropping to -2°C, and snow is possible soon. The strongest geomagnetic storm in 3 months (G3) continues to impact satellite communications and GPS for both sides. TASS reports that the number of solar flares will continue to grow, potentially impacting satellite communication and GPS. Thermal imagery from RF drone footage north of Chasiv Yar indicates low temperatures (-7.5°C to -12.7°C), necessitating thermal optics for detection. Temporary restrictions on air traffic at Sochi airport remain in place.

Key Updates:

• Geomagnetic Storm: The G3 geomagnetic storm continues to impact satellite communications and GPS for both sides. This could affect the precision of long-range guided munitions and drone navigation, potentially increasing error margins for RF strikes and UAF counter-battery fire. (FACT, Previous Report, Confidence: HIGH) TASS reports that the number of solar flares will continue to grow, potentially impacting satellite communication and GPS. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH).
• Thermal Imagery in Drone Footage: Colonelcassad's video shows drone footage from a thermal imager documenting engagements in a winter environment north of Chasov Yar. This suggests low temperatures (e.g., -7.5°C to -12.7°C) are impacting operations and necessitating thermal optics for detection. (FACT, Colonelcassad, Confidence: HIGH). RF "Sever V" unit is actively utilizing thermal-equipped drones to locate and engage UAF infantry, confirming the impact of low temperatures and the necessity of thermal optics for both sides. (FACT, Операция Z, Военкоры Русской Весны, Confidence: HIGH).
• Ongoing Drone Activity: UAF Air Force reports a UAV in eastern Mykolaiv Oblast moving west. This suggests continued drone operations are occurring under current weather conditions. (FACT, Повітряні Сили ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Confidence: HIGH). The interception of 22 Ukrainian UAVs over Belgorod, Crimea, and the Black Sea by RF air defenses also confirms active drone operations by both sides. (FACT, TASS, ASTRA, Confidence: HIGH).
• Aviation Restrictions in Sochi: Temporary restrictions on air traffic have been imposed in Sochi, according to Rosaviatsia. The reason is not stated, but could be related to security concerns (e.g., drone threats) or weather. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures (Confidence: HIGH)

RF Forces:

• Offensive Posture: RF maintains offensive pressure on multiple axes, with confirmed gains in Berëzovoye, Dnipropetropavsk Oblast, and claims of advancing in Volchansk, Kupiansk, Gulyaipole, Serebryansky forestry, Novoekonomichne, and Romanivka. RF is also consolidating positions and supporting offensives beyond Chasiv Yar. RF claims significant success for its "Center" and "East" force groups. RF is conducting offensive operations in Sumy Oblast and assaulting Shandryholove and Serednye towards Lyman. RF drone operators from the 35th Army are actively conducting strikes, and video from "🅾️тважные" (RF unit) shows active burning of UAF equipment and positions at Pokrovsk day and night. RF troops are gradually advancing northeast of Gulyaipole. RF "Sever V" unit is actively engaged in suppressing UAF counterattacks and supporting RF advances near Chasiv Yar. (FACT, Операция Z, Военкоры Русской Весны, Confidence: HIGH).
• Air Activity: RF tactical aviation is launching guided aerial bombs (КАБ) towards northern Kharkiv Oblast. RF UAVs are operating north of Chernihiv and are inbound towards/through Poltava. (FACT, Повітряні Силі ЗС України / Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Николаевский Ванёк, Confidence: HIGH). RF is utilizing drones equipped with thermal imagers to target UAF infantry.
• Logistics & Sustainment: RF frontline units continue to rely on a mix of state and non-governmental aid. Severe localized logistics issues were reported in Sumy Oblast due to UAF FPV drone activity. RF is actively recruiting foreign nationals. Fundraising efforts by various pro-RF military bloggers indicate persistent financial and materiel needs at the unit level.
• Personnel: General-Colonel Alexander Lapin has been dismissed from military service. RF continues to promote youth militarization programs ("Zarnitsa 2.0") and recruit individuals with criminal backgrounds.
• Command & Control: Despite tactical confusion in some areas, strategic C2 remains centralized. Targeting of UAF C2 assets (antennas, drones) is evident in Pokrovsk. Localized C2 responses to UAF drone attacks in Crimea are observed, including rapid public statements and establishment of a hotline.

UAF Forces:

• Active Defense: UAF maintains a resilient and active defensive posture across all major axes, repelling over 80 RF combat engagements in the last 24 hours. UAF 28th Mechanized Brigade artillery is actively engaging RF targets near Konstantinovka (Pokrovsk axis), aiming to keep the enemy at bay. (FACT, ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS, Confidence: HIGH). Robust border defenses and effective FPV drone operations continue in Sumy Oblast. UAF FPV drone units (e.g., 4th "Wormbusters") are conducting successful strikes against RF personnel. (FACT, Оперативний ЗСУ, Confidence: HIGH).
• Deep Strike Capabilities: UAF continues deep strike operations against RF energy infrastructure and military assets in occupied Crimea, as evidenced by attacks on the "Foros" sanatorium and a school.
• Special Operations: UAF SSO 144th Center 1st Detachment successfully conducted a special operation on the Pokrovsk direction, clearing a depot and capturing nine RF soldiers. (FACT, ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS, Confidence: HIGH).
• Air Defense Vigilance: UAF Air Force remains on high alert, issuing continuous warnings for UAVs and tactical aviation in various regions, and successfully intercepting RF aerial targets, including two Lancet drones over Siversk.
• Naval Drone Operations: UAF operates advanced submersible drones ('Toloka') capable of carrying explosives and utilizing neural networks.
• Readiness Challenges: Ongoing fundraising efforts from multiple brigades and reports of fundraising shortfalls highlight persistent resource constraints for UAF units, potentially impacting readiness. The disavowal of a fraudulent fundraising campaign by the 158th Brigade underscores challenges in maintaining public trust for resource acquisition.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (Confidence: HIGH)

Capabilities:

• Long-Range Precision Strike: RF maintains the capability for large-scale combined missile and UAV attacks, although the scale has reduced in the last 24 hours. Persistent launches of guided aerial bombs (КАБ) towards Kharkiv and Sumy Oblasts, and general drone activity across various regions, demonstrate continuous kinetic and reconnaissance capabilities. RF successfully targeted a UAF locomotive with a kamikaze UAV.
• Ground Offensive Operations: RF has demonstrated the capability to conduct multi-axis, persistent ground offensives, achieving localized territorial gains in Dnipropetropavsk (Berëzovoye) and Donetsk Oblasts (Novoekonomichne, Romanivka), and maintaining pressure around Chasiv Yar and Lyman. RF special forces are capable of urban combat, as evidenced by their operations in Pokrovsk. RF units like "Sever V" are effectively employing thermal drones to support ground offensives.
• Hybrid Warfare: RF continues to employ sophisticated hybrid operations, including direct military provocations against NATO airspace/territory, large-scale unattributed cyberattacks, and comprehensive information operations.
• Drone Warfare: RF possesses and is developing advanced drone systems, including "mother drones" for extended range. RF claims successful interdiction of UAF naval drones and has demonstrated effective counter-UAV measures in Kupiansk. Their drones are actively used for kinetic strikes and reconnaissance, with new capabilities observed in thermal imaging.

Intentions:

• Degrade UAF Warfighting Capability and Civilian Morale: RF intends to continue kinetic operations against military assets, infrastructure, and civilian targets to degrade UAF's ability to fight and to undermine public morale. The continued use of КАБ and Shahed drones, as well as the targeted strikes in Crimea (which RF frames as targeting civilian objects), support this.
• Sustain Ground Pressure and Achieve Territorial Gains: RF intends to maintain the operational initiative on key axes, particularly Pokrovsk and Lyman, to achieve incremental territorial gains and exhaust UAF defenses.
• Test NATO Resolve and Sow Discord: RF will continue probing NATO's borders and amplifying narratives that highlight divisions within the alliance, seeking to undermine Western unity and support for Ukraine.
• Consolidate Control in Occupied Territories: RF intends to normalize its control over occupied territories, including through infrastructure projects and the imposition of its administrative systems.
• Geopolitical Exploitation: RF will continue to leverage international developments, such as the recognition of Palestine, to highlight perceived Western hypocrisy or divisions and advance its anti-hegemonic narratives.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (Confidence: HIGH)

RF Tactical Changes:

• De-escalation in Air Attack Scale: A significant reduction in the scale of large-scale combined missile and UAV attacks, potentially for reconstitution, while maintaining persistent smaller-scale drone and КАБ attacks.
• Targeting of UAF Logistics: Demonstrated capability and intent to strike UAF railway logistics with kamikaze UAVs (Pavlograd locomotive strike).
• Urban Special Operations: Use of special forces for clearing urban areas and capturing prisoners (Pokrovsk depot operation).
• "Mother Drones": Reported deployment of "mother drones" to extend UAV operational range.
• Adaptive C2 (Local): Rapid, localized C2 responses and narrative control around UAF drone attacks in Crimea.
• Enhanced Drone Reconnaissance/Strike: Demonstrated use of thermal-equipped drones ("Sever V" unit) for hunting UAF infantry, indicating improved all-weather/night reconnaissance and precision strike capabilities. (FACT, Операция Z, Военкоры Русской Весны, Confidence: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (Confidence: MEDIUM)

RF Logistics: Strained at the tactical level, as evidenced by localized equipment failures and inability to resupply under UAF drone pressure in Sumy Oblast. Reliance on non-governmental aid indicates state-level logistical challenges. Persistent fundraising appeals for frontline units underscore ongoing materiel and financial needs. However, RF also demonstrates the capability to produce new military equipment (SARM MLRS). Economic strain from rising fuel prices and potential tax increases could indirectly impact logistical costs.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness (Confidence: MEDIUM)

RF C2: Degraded at tactical/operational levels, particularly in high-pressure environments, with reports of "complete confusion" in radio communications. Strategic C2 remains centralized, but the dismissal of General-Colonel Lapin suggests potential internal friction or efforts to improve C2 effectiveness by removing underperforming commanders. RF is demonstrating effective tactical coordination of special forces, drones, and artillery in specific ground operations. Their immediate and coordinated response to UAF strikes in Crimea indicates effective localized C2 and a clear directive to control the information narrative around such events.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness (Confidence: HIGH)

Posture: UAF maintains an active and resilient defensive posture across all major axes, with consistent repelling of RF assaults. UAF is conducting effective deep strike operations into occupied Crimea and RF territory. Active monitoring and response to RF air activity are continuous. The 28th Mechanized Brigade is actively employing artillery to defend Konstantinovka. UAF SSO demonstrated successful urban clearing and prisoner capture on the Pokrovsk direction. UAF FPV drone units are effectively engaging RF personnel, demonstrating tactical proficiency.

Readiness: UAF demonstrates high combat readiness, effectively repelling intense RF assaults and conducting complex air defense and deep strike operations. Adaptive capabilities, such as the formal establishment of "drone assault troops" and successful F-16 operations, are notable. However, ongoing fundraising shortfalls for critical supplies, and issues with fraudulent fundraising, highlight persistent resource constraints that could impact long-term readiness.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks (Confidence: HIGH)

Successes:

• Air Defense: UAF FPV drones successfully intercepted two Russian Lancet drones on the Siversk direction.
• Deep Strikes: Successful drone attacks on RF oil refineries, oil depots, three Mi-8 helicopters, and a Nebo-U radar system in Crimea. UAF drone attacks on the "Foros" sanatorium and a school in Crimea, resulting in casualties and damage.
• Ground Operations: UAF repelled over 80 RF combat engagements in the last 24 hours, eliminated an RF breakthrough near Pokrovsk. UAF SSO successfully cleared a depot and captured nine RF soldiers on the Pokrovsk direction. Confirmed liberation of Pankivka and Zarichne, Donetsk Oblast. UAF FPV drones successfully neutralized two RF personnel. (FACT, Оперативний ЗСУ, Confidence: HIGH).
• Counter-Armor: Successful UAF strike on a Russian "Terminator" armored vehicle and destruction of an RF IMP-3M engineering vehicle.

Setbacks:

• Civilian Casualties/Infrastructure Damage: Explosion near Lviv (unconfirmed cause) and continued civilian casualties from RF strikes (Konstantinovka). Damage to a school in Crimea from UAF drone attack, resulting in 2 fatalities and 15 wounded (RF MoD claim).
• Logistical Disruption: Kamikaze UAV strike on a UAF locomotive near Pavlograd.
• Resource Constraints: Persistent fundraising shortfalls and challenges with fundraising integrity impacting resource acquisition.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints (Confidence: HIGH)

Requirements: Critical need for advanced air defense systems and munitions (especially for Shahed interceptors), anti-drone capabilities, and long-range precision strike assets. Ongoing requirements for engineering assets, personnel, training, and medical supplies. Continued financial support for units through legitimate fundraising is vital.

Constraints: Munitions depletion for air defense, potential fluctuations in Western aid, vulnerabilities in logistical networks, and challenges with public support and legitimate fundraising efforts. The disavowal of a fraudulent fundraising campaign highlights a significant constraint on public trust and effective resource acquisition.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Confidence: HIGH)

RF Propaganda/Disinformation:

• Narrative of Victory/Control: RF continues to push narratives of successful operations and territorial gains, aimed at boosting domestic morale and projecting strength. RF MoD frames the UAF attack on Crimea as a "premeditated terrorist attack on civilian objects" to delegitimize UAF actions and generate outrage, emphasizing civilian casualties. The dismissal of Gen. Lapin is likely to be downplayed or spun as routine.
• Demoralization of UAF: RF attempts to demoralize UAF forces by highlighting perceived personnel shortages ("people are not enough, they run out quickly") and challenges.
• Testing NATO Resolve: RF uses drone incursions near NATO borders to test response mechanisms and create narratives of NATO overreaction.
• Exploiting Geopolitical Tensions: RF continues to leverage international diplomatic developments (e.g., Palestine recognition by Portugal) to highlight perceived Western hypocrisy or divisions and advance its anti-hegemonic narratives. This is exemplified by state media's immediate focus on Portugal's recognition of Palestine in contrast to Netanyahu's stance. (FACT, Alex Parker Returns, Confidence: HIGH).

UAF Counter-Narratives/Information Operations:

• Highlighting RF Atrocities/Failures: UAF emphasizes RF attacks on civilian infrastructure and casualties, and reports on RF logistical failures (Sumy Oblast drone effects).
• Showcasing UAF Successes: UAF actively publicizes tactical victories (Lancet interceptions, SSO operations, deep strikes in Crimea, destruction of RF armor, FPV drone successes) and adaptive capabilities (drone assault troops, F-16s).
• Promoting Unity and Resilience: UAF uses messages of national unity, military professionalism, and community resilience in response to attacks.
• Combating Disinformation: UAF actively refutes RF disinformation (e.g., Diia data leak claims) and addresses internal challenges (e.g., Arestovich fundraising fraud).
• Recruitment/Morale: UAF uses videos showcasing military operations to encourage recruitment and boost morale.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors (Confidence: MEDIUM)

Ukrainian Sentiment: Remains largely resilient in the face of persistent RF attacks, but local civilian casualties cause significant distress (Lviv, Konstantinovka, and now the claimed casualties in Crimea). Public support for the military is high, but fundraising fatigue or concerns over fraudulent campaigns pose risks to sustained support. National memorials and recognition of heroes continue to bolster morale. The constant air alerts and threat of КАБ attacks likely contribute to a pervasive sense of anxiety among the civilian population.

Russian Sentiment: Mixed. State propaganda aims to portray victory and stability, but internal issues such as mobilization concerns, reports of corruption within military aid, and rising fuel prices could erode public confidence. Dismissal of high-ranking generals may be viewed with apprehension by some. Pro-war sentiment is actively cultivated through youth programs and nationalist narratives. The publicization of casualties in Crimea from UAF attacks is intended to generate outrage and unify public opinion against Ukraine.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments (Confidence: HIGH)

Support for Ukraine:

• NATO Vigilance: Continued NATO (British, German) air patrols and interceptions of RF aircraft near the Baltic Sea demonstrate ongoing commitment to collective security.
• Diplomatic Momentum (Palestine Recognition): The recognition of Palestinian statehood by the UK, Australia, Canada, and now Portugal (FACT, Alex Parker Returns, Confidence: HIGH) signifies shifts in the international diplomatic landscape. While not directly related to Ukraine, these developments are part of a broader geopolitical realignment that RF will seek to exploit to portray Western disunity.
• US Pledges: Trump's statement on defending Poland if RF escalates reinforces US commitment to regional security.
• EU Concerns: EU leaders expressing concerns about the risks of World War III highlight the continued geopolitical tension surrounding the conflict.

Support for Russia:

• Geopolitical Alignment: Hungarian PM Orban's statement on the West not being a role model aligns with RF's anti-Western narratives.
• Humanitarian Aid to Palestine: RF's provision of humanitarian aid to Palestinian refugees is an attempt to project goodwill and garner international support, particularly in the Global South.
• Exploiting Western Divisions: RF will continue to highlight any perceived disagreements or policy shifts among Western allies (e.g., Trump's comments on Bagram, Macron's stance on Israel/US, alleged French PM's education fraud, and perceived US political division as seen in Trump rallies). (FACT, Colonelcassad, Alex Parker Returns, Confidence: HIGH).

Intelligence Gaps:

• CRITICAL (PERSISTING - PRIORITY 1): Obtain comprehensive Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) for the 20 SEP massive RF air strike. This remains the highest intelligence priority to determine RF's strategic targeting success versus terror objectives.
• CRITICAL (NEW - PRIORITY 2): Verify the new Line of Contact (LOC) around RF's newly confirmed gains at Novoekonomichne and Romanivka. Task ISR to identify likely RF follow-on objectives on this axis.
• HIGH (NEW - PRIORITY 3): Assess the primary reason for General Lapin's dismissal. Determine if it signals a change in strategy, is a result of operational failure (e.g., in Kharkiv), or is due to internal political friction. Assess the likely impact on C2 of the "Center" and Leningrad Military District forces.
• HIGH (PERSISTING): Assess the true tactical situation in the Serebryansky forestry and Shandryholove. Verify the extent of RF control and the stability of UAF defensive lines.
• MEDIUM (NEW): Obtain BDA for the UAF GUR strike on the Mi-8 helicopters and Nebo-U radar in Crimea to confirm the extent of damage and impact on RF capabilities.
• MEDIUM (NEW): Determine if the Russian drone found in Poland was an intentional probe or an operational malfunction/error.
• MEDIUM (NEW): Conduct BDA on the explosion near Lviv.
• LOW (NEW): Verify the impact and exact locations of RF КАБ strikes in northern Kharkiv Oblast.
• LOW (NEW): Assess the full impact of the UAF SSO operation in Pokrovsk, including the disposition of captured RF personnel.
• LOW (NEW): Determine the origin and exact flight path of the RF Shahed drones towards Poltava.
• LOW (NEW): Conduct a thorough BDA for the UAF FPV strike on two RF personnel.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future operations)

Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• RF Ground Offensive (Pokrovsk and Lyman Axes): (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue sustained, high-intensity ground assaults, particularly on the Pokrovsk axis (leveraging gains around Novoekonomichne and Romanivka) and the Lyman axis (exploiting pressure around Shandryholove and Serednye). These offensives will be supported by continued drone operations (including thermal-equipped), artillery, and likely thermobaric weapons. The capture of nine RF soldiers by UAF SSO on the Pokrovsk direction may lead to a temporary localized pause for RF reorganization or a retaliatory increase in RF kinetic activity in that immediate area.
• RF Air/Drone Strikes (Adaptive Harassment & Targeted Strikes): (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will continue with persistent, smaller-scale UAV (Shahed) and guided aerial bomb (КАБ) strikes. These will primarily target UAF forward positions, command posts, and logistical nodes supporting defensive operations (e.g., in northern Kharkiv Oblast, Sumy Oblast). Deeper strikes into UAF territory, such as the inbound Shaheds towards Poltava, will continue to harass civilian populations and stretch UAF air defenses. RF will also likely increase the use of thermal-equipped drones for night operations against UAF infantry and positions.
• RF Hybrid Operations (Information Warfare Amplification): (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF will intensify its information operations, particularly around the UAF attack on Crimea. They will leverage the "terrorist attack on civilian objects" narrative, emphasizing civilian casualties, to demonize UAF, rally domestic support, and potentially justify further retaliatory strikes. They will also amplify any perceived UAF personnel shortages or fundraising issues and continue to exploit any perceived Western disunity.
• RF Border Probing (Continued Low-Level): (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Following the drone incident in Poland, RF will likely continue low-level, deniable probing activities along NATO borders to test response times and capabilities, but without immediate escalation to direct military conflict with NATO.

Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• RF Escalation of Air Attacks (Simultaneous High-Value Strikes): (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF could leverage its "mother drone" capability and reconstituted missile stocks to launch a new large-scale air attack, but with a refined targeting strategy, focusing on critical UAF air defense assets, logistics hubs (similar to the Pavlograd locomotive strike but larger scale), and decision-making centers, potentially simultaneously hitting multiple high-value military targets to overwhelm UAF C2 and air defense more effectively.
• RF Ground Breakthrough (Concentrated Push): (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) RF could attempt a concentrated, large-scale ground breakthrough on either the Pokrovsk or Lyman axis, committing significant reserves and aiming for a deeper advance to collapse a section of the UAF defensive line. This could involve direct assaults with newly committed personnel, potentially including those with health issues, reflecting desperation for gains.
• RF Hybrid Warfare (Kinetic Action against NATO Proxy): (LOW CONFIDENCE) A more dangerous hybrid COA would involve a deniable kinetic action against a non-NATO, but pro-Ukrainian, state or asset in Eastern Europe (e.g., targeting a critical energy pipeline or railway in Moldova or an ally on the Ukrainian border), aiming to disrupt aid flows or create regional instability without direct confrontation with NATO.

Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 24-48 Hours (Immediate): Expect continued high-intensity ground engagements on the Pokrovsk and Lyman axes. RF will conduct harassing drone and КАБ strikes. UAF air defense remains critical. UAF will likely continue localized counter-attacks and deep strikes. The UAF SSO operation on the Pokrovsk direction and the capture of nine RF soldiers presents a window for UAF to exploit local RF vulnerabilities. RF will continue to use the Crimea attack in its information operations.
• Next 72 Hours (Short-Term): RF will likely attempt to consolidate its confirmed gains and may launch further tactical assaults to expand these areas. UAF will need to reinforce defensive lines in these critical sectors. The effectiveness of UAF's counter-drone operations and deep strikes will influence RF's subsequent air campaign scale. The ongoing geomagnetic storm will continue to affect precision and navigation for both sides.
• Decision Points:
  • UAF: Decision to commit tactical reserves to counter RF advances on Pokrovsk/Lyman, or to launch a localized counter-offensive to regain lost territory (e.g., around Shandryholove). Decision on further deep strike targeting in Crimea, weighing military benefit against RF's predictable civilian casualty narrative.
  • RF: Decision on the timing and scale of the next major air campaign, based on BDA from recent strikes and assessment of UAF air defense reconstitution. Decision to reinforce specific ground axes to achieve a breakthrough or to shift pressure to a new axis.

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Reinforce Pokrovsk and Lyman Axes, Counter Thermal Drone Threat:

   • Action: Immediately allocate additional artillery, anti-tank assets, and FPV drone units to the Pokrovsk and Lyman axes, particularly to areas adjacent to RF gains at Novoekonomichne, Romanivka, Shandryholove, and Serednye. Prioritize strengthening secondary defensive lines. Distribute night vision/thermal optics and deploy mobile EW units to counter RF thermal drone operations against UAF infantry.
   • Justification: These axes remain RF's primary ground offensive focus, and recent gains, coupled with enhanced RF thermal drone capabilities, indicate a persistent threat of further penetration. Preventing a breakthrough here is paramount.

2. Sustain Deep Strike Campaign, Adjust Narrative:

   • Action: Continue to task UAF GUR and SSO with deep strike operations against high-value RF military assets, especially air defense systems (e.g., Nebo-U radars), command and control nodes, and airfields in occupied territories and RF deep rear. Enhance targeting precision to minimize collateral damage.
   • Justification: These strikes degrade RF's ability to conduct air attacks, protect its forces, and project power, creating a multi-domain dilemma for RF. Minimizing civilian casualties, or being able to demonstrably refute RF claims of such, is crucial for maintaining international support.

3. Enhance Counter-UAV Capabilities and Defensive Measures:

   • Action: Prioritize the rapid deployment of mobile C-UAS systems, EW capabilities, and passive defenses (e.g., anti-drone nets) to critical infrastructure and frontline units, especially those vulnerable to Lancet and Shahed attacks. Invest in local 3D printing capabilities for drone munitions to support UAF FPV units.
   • Justification: RF's continued reliance on drones and adaptation with "mother drones" and thermal capabilities necessitates a robust and layered defense. Localized production enhances sustainment and responsiveness.

4. Strategic Communication on RF Losses and Internal Strife (Enhanced):

   • Action: Publicize and amplify details of the successful UAF SSO operation (Pokrovsk depot, 9 captured RF soldiers), the Lancet drone interceptions, and General Lapin's dismissal. Frame these events as indicators of RF operational failures, C2 instability, and declining morale. Simultaneously, actively counter RF disinformation regarding civilian casualties from UAF strikes, providing verifiable evidence where possible. Highlight RF's use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes.
   • Justification: Exploiting RF's vulnerabilities in the information domain can degrade enemy morale, foster internal dissent, and boost UAF morale and international support. Proactive counter-disinformation is crucial to maintain narrative control.

5. Review and Secure Logistics Routes for КАБ/Drone Attacks:

   • Action: Conduct an immediate and comprehensive review of key railway and road logistics routes, particularly in Dnipropetropavsk, Kharkiv, and Sumy Oblasts, for vulnerabilities to КАБ and kamikaze UAV strikes. Implement enhanced mobile air defense patrols and active EW countermeasures along these routes.
   • Justification: The strike on the Pavlograd locomotive highlights a critical vulnerability in UAF logistics that RF will likely exploit further. Protecting these lines is essential for force sustainment.

6. Strengthen Air Defense for Western and Central Cities:

   • Action: Prioritize the allocation of Western-supplied SAMs and interceptor munitions to protect major cities in western and central Ukraine (e.g., Lviv, Poltava, Kyiv) from future RF air attacks.
   • Justification: While the scale of the immediate air threat has reduced, the explosion near Lviv and inbound Shaheds to Poltava demonstrate continued RF intent to strike deep, and robust air defense is critical for civilian protection and strategic stability.

//END REPORT//