Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT

TIME: 210800Z SEP 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW (Current operational picture)

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain (Confidence: HIGH)

RF forces maintain multi-axis pressure across the Kupiansk, Lyman, Pokrovsk, Siversk, Dnipropetropavsk, and Zaporizhzhia axes, with heavy reciprocal battles in Sumy Oblast. RF claims recent unverified advances in Volchansk, Kharkiv Oblast, and the occupation of the medical college area in Kupiansk, with military control and fortifications on the Velikoburlukskoye direction. RF also claims a 5km advance on the Gulyaipole direction, entering Novoivanivka, and new positions south of Novoivanivka in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. RF claims full control of Serebryansky forestry and the liberation of Berëzovoye in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast (CONFIRMED by RF MoD). RF continues to claim an offensive behind Chasiv Yar. UAF has confirmed the liberation of Pankivka, Donetsk Oblast, and Zarichne, and reports eliminating a Russian breakthrough near Pokrovsk. Heavy fighting continues on the Krasnolimanskoye direction. UAF General Staff reports over 80 combat engagements in the last 24 hours, repelling the majority of RF assaults across multiple axes, particularly Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka.

Recent RF Developments:

• Berëzovoye (Dnipropetropavsk Oblast): RF MoD confirmed the liberation of Berëzovoye. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Kupiansk Direction: RF reports continued combat and a damaged military vehicle on this direction. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Krasnoarmeysk Direction: RF claims TOS-1A strikes on hostile reinforced positions. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Chasiv Yar: RF special forces claim to be supporting an offensive beyond Chasiv Yar. (FACT, RF CLAIM, Confidence: HIGH)
• Konstantinovka: RF claims destruction of UAF fortified areas near Konstantinovka. (FACT, RF CLAIM, Confidence: MEDIUM)
• Volchansk: RF reports capturing a UAF border guard in Volchansk area. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: MEDIUM)
• "Center" and "East" Groups: RF claims "Center" and "East" force groups had the most success in the special operation zone this week. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: MEDIUM)
• Khatne (Kharkiv Oblast): RF forces claimed to have occupied a number of fortified areas and forest belts near Khatne, Kharkiv Oblast. (FACT, RF CLAIM, Confidence: MEDIUM)
• Sudzha District (Kursk Oblast): RF claims of alleged war crimes by UAF in Sudzha district, Kursk Oblast. (FACT, RF CLAIM, Confidence: LOW - propaganda driven)
• Engineering Vehicle Destroyed: RF source "Colonelcassad" shared video footage claiming a Lancet drone strike on a Ukrainian engineering vehicle, resulting in an explosion and significant damage. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This indicates continued RF targeting of UAF support and logistics vehicles.
• Zarnitsa 2.0 (RF): All-Russian military-patriotic game "Zarnitsa 2.0" united over 3,000,000 children across Russia. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This is a youth program and does not directly impact battlefield geometry, but shows long-term nationalistic indoctrination.
• Malaya Korchakovka (Sumy Oblast): RF radio intercept indicates critical equipment failure and casualties among Russian soldiers in the vicinity of Malaya Korchakovka, Sumy Oblast, due to heavy FPV drone presence. It suggests a breakdown in rotation and supply. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This is a significant direct battlefield development showing UAF tactical success and RF operational difficulties in Sumy.
• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (New): RF MoD reports via TASS that RF Armed Forces destroyed UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). This likely refers to continued pressure in areas surrounding Berëzovoye.
• Poland Drone Incident (New): RMF24 reports another Russian drone was found in Poland, near the Kaliningrad border. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH). This indicates continued RF border probing or accidental incursions into NATO airspace/territory.

Recent UAF Developments:

• Air Defense Success: UAF Air Force reports 583 enemy targets were shot down/suppressed overnight. F-16 operations against enemy missiles are confirmed. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Deep Strikes: UAF SBU and SSO drones stopped operation of several oil pumping stations in RF. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Naval Drone Interceptions: UAF intercepted Russian boats with FPV drones near Kherson. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Kharkiv Oblast Drone Activity: An enemy UAV detected north of Kharkiv Oblast, heading south. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Explosions in Sumy: Ukrainian media (РБК-Україна) reported explosions in Sumy. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This indicates ongoing RF fire activity in the region.
• Dmitry Patrushev on SBU Wanted List: SBU has placed Dmitry Patrushev on its wanted list. (FACT, TASS REPORT citing SBU, Confidence: HIGH) This indicates UAF intelligence operations targeting high-ranking RF officials.
• UAVs and Tactical Aviation Alerts: UAF Air Force reports drone activity and tactical aviation in unspecified regions, likely continuing reconnaissance or pre-strike activity. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Odesa Air Alert: An air alert has been declared in Odesa Oblast (ОВА). (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This indicates immediate air threat for the region.
• Air Alert (New): UAF Air Force issued a general "Attention!" alert, indicating a widespread or significant threat. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Tactical Aviation Activity (New): UAF Air Force reports enemy tactical aviation activity in the southeastern direction. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). This indicates continued RF air reconnaissance or strike preparations in that area.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations (Confidence: HIGH)

Current conditions are generally clear and favorable for air operations across most of Ukraine. A cold front is moving into the Carpathians with temperatures dropping to -2°C, and snow is possible soon. The strongest geomagnetic storm in 3 months (G3) continues to impact satellite communications and GPS for both sides.

RF Air/Missile Activity:

• Massive Overnight Attack: RF launched approximately 40 missiles and 580 UAVs (including Shaheds, S-300, Iskander-M/KN-23) against Ukraine overnight. This resulted in significant civilian casualties: 3 dead and 36 injured in Dnipro (residential multi-story building hit by cluster munitions), 1 killed in Khmelnytskyi Oblast, 6 injured (3 medics) in Chernihiv Oblast from drone attack, 5 killed in Konstantinovka (КАБ strike).
• Deep Strikes into RF: UAF drone attacks caused 4 fatalities in Samara Oblast and explosions at oil refineries in Saratov and Novokuibyshevsk.
• Ongoing КАБ Launches: UAF Air Force continues to report КАБ launches on Sumy, Kharkiv, and Donetsk Oblasts, and towards Dnipropetropavsk Oblast (Synelnykivskyi district).
• New Threats: UAVs were reported approaching Desna (Chernihiv Oblast), Kremenchuk, Sumy, and Odesa Oblast. Ballistic threats were reported for Dnipropetropavsk and Mykolaiv Oblasts.
• RF Internal Damage: A part of the historical fortress wall in Kumukh, Dagestan, collapsed due to heavy rains. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This is a civilian infrastructure incident in RF.
• RF Tactical Aviation Activity: UAF Air Force reports activity of enemy tactical aviation in the Azov Sea, indicating readiness for further air strikes.
• Kharkiv Oblast Drone Activity: An enemy UAV was reported in northern Kharkiv Oblast moving south. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Sumy Explosions: Reports of explosions in Sumy (РБК-Україна) confirm ongoing kinetic activity in this border region, likely from RF artillery or rocket fire. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• UAVs in Northern Chernihiv/Kharkiv: Enemy UAVs detected in northern Chernihiv and northern Kharkiv Oblasts, heading south. (FACT, UAF Air Force, Confidence: HIGH) This indicates ongoing RF reconnaissance or targeting.
• Kamchatka Earthquake: An earthquake of magnitude 6.1 occurred in Kamchatka. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This is a natural disaster in RF territory, unrelated to direct military operations.
• Odesa Air Alert: An air alert has been declared in Odesa Oblast (ОВА). (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This indicates immediate air threat for the region.
• General Air Alert (New): UAF Air Force issued a general "Attention!" alert. This indicates a broad or unspecified air threat. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Southeastern Tactical Aviation (New): UAF Air Force reports enemy tactical aviation activity in the southeastern direction, indicating potential for air-launched munitions or reconnaissance in that sector. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures (Confidence: HIGH)

RF Forces:

• Offensive Posture: RF maintains offensive pressure on multiple axes, with confirmed gains in Berëzovoye, Dnipropetropavsk Oblast, and claims of advancing in Volchansk, Kupiansk, Gulyaipole, Serebryansky forestry, and towards Lyman (Shandryholove, Serednye, Novoselivka). RF is also consolidating positions and supporting offensives beyond Chasiv Yar. RF claims significant success for its "Center" and "East" force groups. Latest claims include capturing fortified areas near Khatne, Kharkiv Oblast. RF is conducting offensive operations in Sumy Oblast, as evidenced by radio intercepts detailing equipment failures and casualties near Malaya Korchakovka under heavy UAF FPV drone presence. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). RF MoD also claims destruction of UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, confirming ongoing offensive action in that area. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Equipment: RF is producing new 300-mm SARM MLRS systems, as observed during Putin's visit to Motovilikhinskiye Zavody. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) RF is also utilizing TOS-1A thermobaric systems. RF "Colonelcassad" footage shows Lancet drone strikes on Ukrainian engineering vehicles. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) RF is manufacturing new MC-21 aircraft. (FACT, Colonelcassad, Confidence: HIGH). This is relevant for long-term aviation industrial capacity, not immediate tactical impact. Patches from the "SVO zone" are being circulated, indicating internal identification and morale efforts. (FACT, RF SOCIAL MEDIA, Confidence: MEDIUM).
• Logistics & Sustainment: RF "Sever" Brigade assault troops received humanitarian aid (food, supplies) via МОО Вече. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This indicates continued reliance on non-governmental support for frontline units. RF also confirmed the presentation of the 300-mm SARM MLRS at "Motovilikhinskiye Zavody" during Putin's visit, implying increased production capabilities. RF is importing doctors from Kalmykia to temporarily occupied Ukrainian territories (RBC-Ukraine). (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: MEDIUM). Radio intercepts from Sumy Oblast reveal severe logistics issues for RF, including equipment failure, ammunition detonation, and inability to conduct rotation and resupply under UAF drone pressure. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). This indicates significant tactical-level logistics failures. A train derailment in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk involving 8 coal wagons is an unrelated domestic logistical incident in RF. (FACT, ASTRA, Confidence: HIGH)
• Personnel: Indexation of military salaries by 7.6% from October 1st is planned. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) This is an incentive to boost morale and recruitment. RF sources continue to report on "Faith on the SVO" and related morale-boosting content. RF is actively recruiting UAV operators. RF claims a soldier infiltrated UAF lines and destroyed a UAF group. RF captured a UAF border guard in the Volchansk area. "Zarnitsa 2.0" youth program is being promoted, indicating long-term militarization of youth. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). Radio intercepts from Sumy Oblast confirm RF casualties (200s, burned, wounded) and equipment losses due to UAF FPV drone activity, further highlighting personnel strain. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Command & Control: Reports indicate "complete confusion" in RF radio communications due to UAF jamming and internal interference, suggesting significant C2 degradation at tactical and operational levels. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) The radio intercept from Sumy Oblast depicting panic, requests for immediate evacuation, and a lack of tactical preparedness ("no cover available") under UAF drone fire further underscores tactical C2 breakdown and disorganized response. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Zaporizhzhia NPP External Power: The director of ZNPP, Yuriy Chernychuk, claims the plant can restore stable external power without the line connected to Ukrainian-controlled territory, which has been offline for five months. (FACT, TASS Report, Confidence: MEDIUM) This is an RF attempt to project self-sufficiency and control over ZNPP.
• Drone Deployment/Activity (New): Another Russian drone reportedly found in Poland near Kaliningrad. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH). This is a physical manifestation of RF drone activity near NATO borders.

UAF Forces:

• Defensive Operations: UAF continues to repel a high number of RF assaults across all key axes, demonstrating resilient defensive operations despite heavy pressure. UAF forces also liberated some settlements in Donetsk Oblast and conducted counter-offensives in the Dobropillya area. UAF FPV drone operations in Sumy Oblast are highly effective, disrupting RF rotation, supply, and inflicting casualties. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Drone Warfare: UAF continues to leverage FPV drones and other UAVs effectively for reconnaissance, direct strikes, and interdiction operations (e.g., against RF boats near Kherson, and confirmed in Sumy Oblast against RF ground forces). Zelenskyy announced the formation of a new branch of service dedicated to drone assault troops, indicating a formal strategic adaptation.
• Air Defense: UAF air defense achieved a high interception rate against RF's massive overnight air attack, with F-16s playing a critical role. Continued alerts regarding UAVs and tactical aviation indicate ongoing vigilance. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) An air alert in Odesa further indicates UAF C2 rapidly communicating threats. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). A general "Attention!" alert issued by UAF Air Force also confirms high vigilance. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Intelligence & Counter-Intelligence: UAF continues deep strike operations against RF energy infrastructure and successfully apprehended a saboteur in Druzhkivka. UAF SVR assesses RF is preparing for a large budget deficit in 2026. UAF SBU has placed Dmitry Patrushev on a wanted list. (FACT, TASS Report citing SBU, Confidence: HIGH)
• Morale: UAF maintains morale through commendations, veteran support initiatives, and positive cultural messages (e.g., Oleksandr Usyk's support). Ongoing fundraising appeals highlight critical resource needs.
• Sumy Defense: Reports of explosions in Sumy indicate UAF forces are actively engaged in defensive posture in the region, confirmed by highly effective drone operations disrupting RF forces. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• UAV Detection: UAF Air Force reports detection of enemy UAVs in northern Chernihiv and northern Kharkiv Oblasts. (FACT, UAF Air Force, Confidence: HIGH) UAF remains vigilant. UAF Air Force also reports enemy tactical aviation activity in the southeastern direction. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).

1.4. Weather and Environmental Factors (Added by Analyst)

• Geomagnetic Storm: The G3 geomagnetic storm continues to impact satellite communications and GPS for both sides. This could affect the precision of long-range guided munitions and drone navigation, potentially increasing error margins for RF strikes and UAF counter-battery fire. (FACT, Previous Report, Confidence: HIGH)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (Confidence: HIGH)

Capabilities:

• Long-Range Precision Strike (CRITICAL): RF demonstrated an unprecedented capability for large-scale combined missile and UAV attacks, saturating UAF air defenses across the country, including deep rear areas and western oblasts. Confirmed use of cluster munitions on civilian residential targets is highly concerning. RF is developing and producing advanced MLRS (SARM) and continues to emphasize unguided aerial bombs with UMPK glide kits. RF tactical aviation continues to launch munitions into Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. RF utilizes TOS-1A thermobaric artillery effectively. RF maintains active tactical aviation in the Azov Sea. RF continues to employ Lancet drones effectively against UAF engineering vehicles. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH) RF's ability to produce new MC-21 aircraft demonstrates long-term industrial aviation capacity, though not immediately relevant to tactical capabilities in Ukraine. RF MoD also claims destruction of UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, confirming capability to conduct effective localized strikes. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Ground Offensive Operations (SEVERE): RF possesses the capability to conduct multi-axis, persistent ground offensives, resulting in localized territorial gains, particularly on the Pokrovsk, Novopavlivka, and Dnipropetropavsk axes (confirmed capture of Berëzovoye). RF also claims advances in Sumy Oblast (Yastrebinoe) and towards Lyman and Chasiv Yar, and new claims of fortified areas near Khatne, Kharkiv Oblast. RF showcases coordinated fire and movement, including tactical evacuation of casualties in urban combat environments. RF is deploying Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) like "Courier" for logistical and potentially direct combat roles. RF's "Center" and "East" groups demonstrate effective offensive capabilities. RF maintains offensive pressure on the Sumy axis, despite tactical setbacks from UAF drones. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Hybrid Warfare (CRITICAL - EXPANDED): RF continues to employ sophisticated hybrid operations, including direct military provocations against NATO airspace (MiG-31 incursion into Estonia, confirmed by Pentagon), large-scale unattributed cyberattacks (European airports), and comprehensive information operations (propaganda, narrative shaping, foreign agent designations, exploitation of POWs, and racist/derogatory content). RF is also developing naval anti-drone systems. The "Zarnitsa 2.0" program indicates a long-term strategic effort to militarize youth and indoctrinate them with patriotic narratives, bolstering future human resources for potential conflicts. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). The reported discovery of another Russian drone in Poland near Kaliningrad indicates persistent aerial activity or probing of NATO borders. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH). RF's internal warning about fraudsters manipulating children online could potentially be weaponized for propaganda or covert recruitment efforts. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: LOW - analytical judgment).
• Drone Warfare (ADVANCED): RF continues to develop and deploy various drone systems, including FPV drones, heavy hexacopters, and counter-UAV systems. They are actively integrating these into both offensive and defensive operations. The detection of enemy UAVs in northern Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts, moving south, indicates continued reconnaissance or pre-strike activity. The use of Lancet drones against UAF engineering vehicles demonstrates continued offensive drone capabilities. Alerts from UAF Air Force regarding UAVs and tactical aviation confirm ongoing RF aerial reconnaissance and strike capabilities. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). RF radio intercepts from Sumy Oblast reveal that RF forces are highly vulnerable to UAF FPV drone activity, resulting in casualties, equipment failure, and logistical disruption. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).

Intentions:

• Degrade UAF Warfighting Capability and Civilian Morale (CRITICAL): The massive air strikes aim to degrade UAF's military-industrial complex, logistics, and command & control. The confirmed use of cluster munitions on civilian residential targets and widespread destruction in Konstantinovka indicates an intent to inflict indiscriminate damage and terror, aiming to undermine civilian morale and exhaust UAF air defense resources. RF will also continue to claim precision strikes against military targets (e.g., UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast). RF will continue to target UAF engineering equipment to hinder UAF defensive and offensive preparations. RF claims regarding Zaporizhzhia NPP's self-sufficiency aim to project control and minimize international concerns about its operational safety under RF occupation.
• Sustain Ground Pressure and Achieve Territorial Gains (SEVERE): RF intends to maintain the operational initiative on key axes, particularly Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka, to achieve incremental but consistent territorial gains. Continued pressure around Kupiansk, Siversk, and Lyman (Shandryholove, Serednye, Novoselivka) indicates intent to expand control in those sectors. RF will also continue offensives beyond Chasiv Yar. RF's stated success for "Center" and "East" groups suggests a continued focus on these axes, now potentially including areas like Khatne in Kharkiv Oblast. RF fire activity in Sumy aims to maintain pressure and potentially disrupt UAF logistics or troop concentrations, despite the tactical difficulties encountered with UAF drones. RF will continue "sluggish attacks" on the Sumy sector to tie down UAF forces and create propaganda opportunities. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). RF's destruction of UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (TASS report) supports intent to consolidate and expand gains around Berëzovoye.
• Test NATO Resolve and Sow Discord (CRITICAL): The deliberate violation of Estonian airspace and the concurrent large-scale cyberattack on European airports signal an intent to probe NATO's response mechanisms, identify vulnerabilities, and exploit existing divisions within the alliance and its political leadership. RF will amplify statements from US political figures (e.g., Trump's demand for Bagram Airbase return to Afghanistan, his statements on US government shutdown) to sow discord within the alliance and project US disengagement and internal instability. RF will also likely leverage statements from figures like Alexander Stubb (Finnish President) to portray NATO internal disagreements or assert RF's continued influence. RF will also attempt to exploit any perceived uncertainty or indecision from US leadership, such as Trump's stated desire to "figure out" the Estonian airspace violation, or his claims that the US is pressing Europe to stop buying RF oil. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). The discovery of another Russian drone in Poland near Kaliningrad (RMF24 via Операция Z) further supports an intent to probe or challenge NATO's border security and response. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH).
• Shape Information Environment (AGGRESSIVE): RF will continue to aggressively shape domestic and international narratives to justify its actions, portray UAF as weak/ineffective/inhumane, highlight Western divisions, and boost domestic morale. This includes countering unauthorized statements, promoting specific cultural narratives (Intervision), and utilizing highly derogatory and racist content. RF is actively exploiting captured UAF personnel for propaganda purposes (Volchansk POW video) and fabricating narratives of UAF war crimes in border regions (Kursk Oblast, Sumy Oblast). They will exploit any perceived signs of pro-RF sentiment within Ukraine (train graffiti). RF will leverage any statements that suggest RF should not influence security guarantees for Ukraine to portray Western weakness or hypocrisy, specifically targeting statements like those from Finnish President Stubb. Senator Pushkov's statement directly counters President Stubb's comments, asserting that resolution of the Ukrainian crisis is impossible without Russia's participation due to security concerns. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). This is a direct RF diplomatic counter-narrative. RF will use military experts like Andrey Marochko to disseminate propaganda, especially regarding the Sumy axis and UAF "provocations." RF will frame UAF's actions, such as placing Dmitry Patrushev on a wanted list, as further evidence of Ukrainian aggression. The promotion of "Zarnitsa 2.0" aims to normalize military engagement and foster patriotic sentiment among the youth, projecting a strong future for the RF military. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). RF will also seek to project internal stability and order by reporting on issues like online fraud targeting children, framing it as a domestic challenge that the state is addressing. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH).
• Address Medical Shortfalls in Occupied Territories (TACTICAL/STRATEGIC): The deployment of medical personnel from Kalmykia to occupied territories indicates an intention to address medical needs, likely due to a combination of civilian population needs, military casualties, and a lack of local medical professionals, projecting an image of stable governance.

Courses of Action (Enemy COAs):

• Continued Massive Air and Missile Strikes with Expanded Target Set (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF will sustain a campaign of large-scale, combined missile and UAV attacks (including cruise, ballistic, and КАБ munitions, with continued use of cluster munitions against civilian targets). These attacks will target military-industrial complexes, logistical hubs, and critical energy infrastructure, but also indiscriminately target residential areas. The geographic focus will broaden, maintaining pressure on eastern and central oblasts while increasing deep strikes into western Ukraine. RF tactical aviation will sustain КАБ launches in frontline oblasts. RF will continue large-scale strikes on Ukrainian defense industry. Continued UAV activity in Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts, even if for reconnaissance, poses a direct and immediate threat to UAF positions and potentially civilian infrastructure. RF will continue to utilize Lancet drones against high-value UAF military equipment, including engineering vehicles. UAF Air Force alerts of UAVs and tactical aviation indicate this threat is persistent. The air alert in Odesa indicates an immediate threat in that region, confirming intent to continue strikes. The general "Attention!" alert and reports of tactical aviation in the southeast reinforce this. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). RF claims of destroying UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast indicate continued localized strike intent. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Sustained Multi-Axis Ground Offensives (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF will maintain high-tempo ground offensives across multiple axes. Key efforts will focus on consolidating the recent gain in Berëzovoye and exploiting this foothold to push further into Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. Pressure on the Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka directions will remain extremely high. Renewed assaults are probable in the Kupiansk, Lyman (targeting Shandryholove, Serednye, Novoselivka), Siversk, and Sumy border regions (including continued fire activity as seen in Sumy, and "sluggish attacks" as claimed by RF), despite documented tactical difficulties for RF units in Sumy due to UAF drones. New pressure points could emerge in Kharkiv Oblast (e.g., Khatne). RF will continue to employ heavy artillery (including TOS-1A), FPV drones, and possibly UGVs. RF claims to have destroyed UAF fortified areas near Konstantinovka, indicating sustained pressure there. RF will continue offensive operations on the Krasnoarmeysk-Novopavlovka axis. RF special forces will continue to support offensives beyond Chasiv Yar. RF will highlight the successes of "Center" and "East" groups to justify continued operations. The detected UAVs in northern Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts and tactical aviation in the southeast could be preceding ground reconnaissance or offensive actions in those sectors.
• Aggressive Information Warfare (Domestic & International) (HIGH CONFIDENCE): RF will significantly intensify its information warfare campaign. Domestically, they will present a unified, successful war effort, while actively silencing dissent. Internationally, they will aggressively exploit perceived divisions within NATO and undermine support for Ukraine. RF will use highly derogatory and racist propaganda against Ukraine and amplify international geopolitical issues. RF will leverage captured UAF personnel (e.g., from Volchansk) for propaganda videos designed to undermine Ukrainian morale and nationalist narratives. RF will continue to generate and disseminate false claims of Ukrainian war crimes, particularly in border regions (Kursk, Sumy Oblast), to justify its aggression and delegitimize UAF actions. RF will actively seek out and exploit instances of pro-RF sentiment within Ukraine for propaganda. RF will amplify statements from US political figures (e.g., Trump's demand for Bagram Airbase return, his uncertainty on Estonian airspace violation, his views on government shutdown, and claims about US pressing Europe to stop RF oil purchases) to project US disengagement and a shifting global order. RF will exploit statements about RF not influencing security guarantees for Ukraine to portray Western weakness or internal disagreements, directly countering figures like President Stubb. RF will also use claims about ZNPP's self-sufficiency to project control and stability under Russian occupation. The "Zarnitsa 2.0" program will be used to project a strong future and mobilize youth support for the conflict. Senator Pushkov's statement is a direct example of this counter-narrative. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). RF will use reports about online fraudsters targeting children to project an image of responsible governance and public safety, likely for domestic consumption. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH).
• Escalated Hybrid Operations (NATO Border) (HIGH CONFIDENCE): Expect further, possibly more subtle or deniable, hybrid provocations against NATO's eastern flank (e.g., increased GPS jamming, cyberattacks on civilian infrastructure, continued airspace probing) to test NATO's response without triggering a direct military conflict. The recent drone discovery near Kaliningrad reinforces this. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations (Confidence: HIGH)

• Massive Coordinated Air Strikes: RF has demonstrated an enhanced capability for conducting exceptionally large-scale, coordinated missile and UAV attacks, aiming to overwhelm and saturate UAF air defenses. The shift to targeting deeper western regions (e.g., Stryi) indicates an adaptation in strategic reach and intent.
• Use of Cluster Munitions on Civilian Targets (ESCALATION): The confirmed use of cluster munitions on a residential building in Dnipro is a significant and concerning tactical adaptation, indicative of an intent to inflict indiscriminate damage and terror.
• Unmanned Ground Vehicle (UGV) Deployment: The confirmed active deployment of the "Courier" UGV for logistical or direct combat roles indicates RF's ongoing efforts to integrate unmanned ground systems into their operations.
• Anti-Drone Mobile Units: The fundraising and deployment of modified UAZ vehicles with heavy machine guns as mobile anti-aircraft units ("зенитные расчеты") demonstrates a tactical adaptation to counter the pervasive threat of UAF UAVs on the front lines. RF is also developing naval anti-drone systems.
• Infiltration Tactics (EVOLVING): The RF claim of a soldier infiltrating UAF lines, now including a claim of disguised infiltration leading to destruction of a UAF group, suggests further development in infiltration/sabotage tactics. The capture of a UAF border guard in Volchansk may suggest enhanced RF small unit reconnaissance or infiltration.
• Targeting Military-Industrial Complex: RF has explicitly stated its focus on striking Ukrainian military-industrial complex enterprises, indicating a tactical shift to degrade UAF's long-term war-fighting capacity.
• Electronic Warfare (EW) & C2 Degradation: The reported "complete confusion" in RF radio communications due to UAF jamming and internal interference directly indicates a significant degradation of RF tactical and operational C2 effectiveness, likely hindering coordination and response times. This is a critical development. The radio intercept from Sumy Oblast showing breakdown in rotation, supply, and evacuation under UAF FPV drone pressure directly supports this C2 degradation, particularly at the tactical edge. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Offensive Use of Thermobaric Artillery: Active use of TOS-1A Solntsepyok systems against reinforced positions in Krasnoarmeysk direction demonstrates continued integration of these devastating weapons into offensive tactics.
• Mislabeled Drone Footage (IO Tactic): MoD Russia's posting of UAF drone footage showing destroyed Russian military equipment, mislabeled as "Accurate strikes of Rubikon UAV pilots," suggests a deliberate attempt at misinformation to conceal losses or an operational security failure.
• Contradictory MLRS Reporting (C2/IO Issue): Discrepancies between RF claims and visual evidence regarding an MLRS strike in Chervone, Zaporizhzhia, suggest potential C2 confusion or deliberate misrepresentation by RF sources.
• Exploitation of POWs for Propaganda: RF is consistently and immediately exploiting captured UAF personnel, like the border guard from Volchansk, for propaganda videos. This suggests a formalized process for information exploitation of POWs.
• Targeting Medical Infrastructure for Civilian Support in Occupied Territories: Deployment of doctors from Kalmykia indicates a tactical adjustment to address medical personnel shortages and maintain civilian support in occupied regions, likely due to damaged local infrastructure and population displacement.
• Lancet Drone Employment: Continued use of Lancet drones against UAF engineering vehicles demonstrates an ongoing adaptation to target critical support and logistical assets. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Disinformation on Sumy: RF has adapted its information warfare to specifically claim UAF is engaged in "sluggish attacks" on the Sumy sector while preparing "provocative materials" to discredit RF servicemen. This is a pre-bunking tactic or an attempt to justify future RF actions. (FACT, TASS citing expert, Confidence: HIGH - as RF IO tactic).
• Youth Militarization (New/Long-term): Promotion of the "Zarnitsa 2.0" military-patriotic game for youth is a long-term tactical adaptation in human resource development and psychological warfare, aiming to normalize military service and foster a loyal, militarized population. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Continued Tactical Artillery/Drone Strikes (New): RF MoD claims destruction of UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast indicate continued localized tactical strikes, likely in support of ground advances. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Persistent Border Probing (New): The discovery of another Russian drone in Poland near Kaliningrad suggests a persistent tactical adaptation of using drones for reconnaissance or intimidation near NATO borders. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status (Confidence: MEDIUM)

• Ammunition & Equipment (MIXED): Putin's visit to "Motovilikhinskiye Zavody" and the presentation of new SARM MLRS systems suggest efforts to bolster production. The manufacturing of new MC-21 aircraft also highlights industrial capacity. However, continued fundraising appeals by military bloggers for "Frontline Armor," airborne forces, mobile anti-aircraft units, and assault troops indicate that frontline units still rely significantly on external support for equipment and supplies. The modifications of military trucks with added protection suggest a continued need for battlefield adaptations and reliance on volunteer networks to enhance vehicle survivability. The confirmed deployment of "Courier" UGVs aims to improve battlefield logistics. RF continues to supply and utilize Lancet drones for tactical strikes. Critically, radio intercepts from Sumy Oblast reveal that equipment failure ("My L200 is stuck") and ammunition detonation ("BK is detonating") are directly impacting RF tactical operations, leading to requests for immediate evacuation. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Fuel Supply (CONSTRAINED): UAF deep strikes on oil refineries in Saratov, Novokuibyshevsk, and the Samara oil depot, confirmed by both sides, are causing disruptions to gasoline supplies in Southern Russia. SBU/SSO drones stopping oil pumping stations further exacerbates this. This is a significant vulnerability. Trump's claim that the US is pressing European allies to stop buying RF oil suggests ongoing international efforts to further constrain RF's energy revenues. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). A train derailment in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk involving 8 coal wagons, while unrelated to direct combat, indicates general logistical vulnerabilities in Russia's vast infrastructure. (FACT, ASTRA, Confidence: HIGH).
• Personnel (STRAINED): UAF's Center for Countering Disinformation (CPD) reports Russia no longer consistently has enough contract soldiers to cover irretrievable losses. This aligns with reports of coercive recruitment tactics (e.g., shaming Chechens, releasing criminals) and high financial incentives. The reported deficit of medics at the front also points to personnel strain. The stabbing incident in a military hospital indicates potential internal issues with soldier conduct and control in rear areas. While RF training drills are observed, the quality of some recruits remains questionable. Salary indexation aims to address this. The reported deployment of doctors from Kalmykia to occupied territories (RBC-Ukraine) further highlights medical personnel shortages and reliance on external resources to staff medical facilities in these areas. The "Zarnitsa 2.0" program, while long-term, addresses future personnel sustainment by fostering a militarized youth. Radio intercepts from Sumy Oblast confirm RF casualties ("200s, burned," "wounded, there are two") directly linked to combat. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Supply Lines (CHALLENGED): The Alex Parker Returns report of an RF officer discussing coordinating logistics over a 16 km "pipe" (supply route) for eight days highlights the ongoing complexity and challenges of front-line sustainment. Unsanitary food conditions (mouse in food box) also point to logistical shortcomings. The deployment of UGVs aims to mitigate some of these challenges. Critically, the RF radio intercept from Sumy Oblast indicates a direct disruption of "rotation and supply" (подвоз БК на ЛБС) to the front line due to UAF FPV drone presence, causing ammunition to detonate. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). This demonstrates UAF's ability to directly impact RF frontline logistics.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness (Confidence: MEDIUM)

• RF C2 (DEGRADED): RF command and control appears capable of orchestrating large-scale air operations and coordinating multi-axis ground offensives. However, the reported "complete confusion" in RF radio communications due to UAF jamming and internal interference indicates a significant degradation of tactical and operational C2 effectiveness, likely hindering coordination and response times. This degradation could impact RF's ability to react to changing battlefield conditions, coordinate joint arms operations, and manage logistics effectively. The conflicting reports on the Chervone MLRS strike also point to potential C2 confusion or deliberate misrepresentation. The formal designation of a prominent Z-blogger as a "foreign agent" indicates a top-down effort to control the information environment, suggesting that critical voices are deemed disruptive. The propaganda video featuring a captured UAF border guard, if rapidly produced and distributed, indicates effective C2 for information exploitation. The rapid dissemination of claims regarding UAF war crimes in Kursk and Sumy Oblasts also points to a centralized and rapid C2 for information operations. RF's ability to quickly disseminate drone strike footage (e.g., Lancet strike) suggests effective tactical-level intelligence and propaganda integration. The ZNPP director's public statement about external power self-sufficiency suggests a coordinated information effort to project RF control. The centralized promotion of the "Zarnitsa 2.0" program demonstrates effective C2 for long-term strategic influence. The radio intercept from Sumy Oblast, detailing disorganized communication, panic, and requests for immediate evacuation ("we need immediate evacuation of the 200s") due to equipment failure and UAF FPV drone presence, clearly illustrates a breakdown in tactical C2 under pressure. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). RF MoD's rapid reporting of UAF dugout and hexacopter destruction in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (TASS) demonstrates a degree of centralized control over battlefield information dissemination. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• UAF C2 (RESILIENT & ADAPTIVE): UAF C2 has demonstrated resilience and effectiveness in repelling numerous RF assaults and orchestrating complex air defense operations. The successful interception of a massive RF air attack, with F-16s playing a key role, highlights effective integration of new assets into the C2 structure. The announced formation of dedicated drone assault troops and the training for unmanned systems operators demonstrate a proactive and adaptive approach to C2 in response to evolving battlefield dynamics. The immediate and consistent reporting of RF actions, civilian casualties, and UAF successes indicates a relatively robust and centralized information dissemination system for C2 and public morale. The rapid reporting of explosions in Sumy (РБК-Україна) and UAV detections in Chernihiv/Kharkiv indicates effective local-to-national information flow for situational awareness. The SBU's action to place Dmitry Patrushev on a wanted list indicates effective intelligence operations and a confident C2 structure. The immediate air alert in Odesa demonstrates UAF's C2 effectiveness in rapidly communicating air threats to the public. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). The general "Attention!" alert and reports of tactical aviation in the southeast reinforce UAF's capability to rapidly issue warnings. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue force tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness (Confidence: HIGH)

Force Posture:

• Defensive Resilience: UAF maintains a resilient defensive posture, successfully repelling a high percentage of RF assaults across all key axes, particularly Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka, indicating strong defensive lines and tactical readiness. Robust border defenses are demonstrated against cross-border incursions in Sumy Oblast, with FPV drone operations effectively disrupting RF rotation and supply, and inflicting casualties near Malaya Korchakovka. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Active Counter-Offensive Operations: UAF is engaged in localized counter-offensive operations, liberating territory in the Dobropillya area. Operations on the Kursk direction are ongoing.
• Deep Strike Capabilities: UAF demonstrates a sustained deep strike capability against RF energy infrastructure, confirmed by successful drone attacks on multiple oil refineries, an oil depot, and several oil pumping stations within Russia, creating strategic pressure on RF logistics.
• Integrated Drone Warfare: UAF is increasingly integrating FPV drones and other UAVs into tactical operations, achieving significant successes against RF personnel, vehicles, positions, and SAM systems, as evidenced by the RF radio intercepts from Sumy Oblast. The formal establishment of a new branch of service for drone assault troops signifies a strategic adaptation. UAF successfully intercepted RF amphibious landing attempts near Kherson with FPV drones.
• Air Defense Capacity (ENHANCED): UAF air defense forces demonstrated significant capability by intercepting 583 RF aerial targets during the massive overnight attack. The explicit mention of F-16 involvement in downing a "lion's share" of missiles highlights the effective integration of modern Western aircraft. Dnipropetropavsk Oblast successfully shot down 12 enemy UAVs in the evening. UAF Air Force releases combat footage showcasing air defense effectiveness, including F-16 operations. UAF Air Force continues to issue alerts regarding UAV and tactical aviation activity, demonstrating proactive defensive posture. An air alert in Odesa further indicates UAF C2 rapidly communicating threats. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). A general "Attention!" alert from UAF Air Force (РБК-Україна) confirms a high state of air defense readiness. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Active Counter-Intelligence: The detention of a saboteur in Druzhkivka indicates active and successful counter-intelligence efforts. UAF also warns POW families about malicious actors and enemy intelligence. The SBU's action to place Dmitry Patrushev on a wanted list highlights proactive counter-intelligence and legal actions against high-value RF individuals.
• Electronic Warfare (EW): UAF EW capabilities are demonstrably effective, causing "complete confusion" in RF radio communications.
• Sumy Defense: Continued reports of explosions in Sumy imply an active defensive posture by UAF forces in response to RF kinetic activity, which is highly effective as proven by RF radio intercepts. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• UAV Detection: UAF Air Force reports detection of enemy UAVs in northern Chernihiv and northern Kharkiv Oblasts. (FACT, UAF Air Force, Confidence: HIGH) UAF remains vigilant and capable of detecting aerial threats. UAF Air Force also reports enemy tactical aviation activity in the southeastern direction, confirming constant aerial monitoring. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).

Readiness:

• High Alert Status: UAF forces, particularly air defense units, are operating under a constant state of high alert due to persistent and massive RF aerial threats. The detection of enemy UAVs in northern Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts indicates continued vigilance against incursions. UAF forces in Sumy Oblast remain on high alert due to ongoing kinetic activity, where they are actively engaging RF forces. An air alert in Odesa further confirms this high alert status. A general "Attention!" alert from UAF Air Force reinforces broad readiness. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Training & Adaptation: Ongoing efforts to adapt and enhance combat readiness are evidenced by training for unmanned systems operators and the 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade's physical and psychological training for recruits. The new basic combined-arms training program in Zaporizhzhia further supports this.
• Personnel Quality: The capture of 17 RF POWs by the 'SKELYA' regiment speaks to the effectiveness and combat prowess of specific UAF units. UAF drone tactics are highly effective, even leading to psychological impacts on enemy personnel, as evidenced by RF radio intercepts.
• Volunteer Support: Continued reliance on volunteer donations for critical equipment (Starlink) and defense funds ("Rusoriz") remains vital. Urgent appeals for donations underscore ongoing critical needs, particularly for the 59th Separate Motorized Infantry Brigade (OSHB) on the Pokrovsk direction.
• Humanitarian Response: Ongoing aftermath and cleanup operations in Dnipro, and police/medics operating under shelling in Chernihiv, demonstrate strong humanitarian response capabilities.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks (Confidence: HIGH)

Successes:

• Massive Air Defense Interceptions (CRITICAL): Successfully intercepted/suppressed 583 RF aerial targets during an unprecedented mass attack. F-16s played a major role.
• Strategic Deep Strikes (CRITICAL): Confirmed successful drone strikes on Saratov and Novokuibyshevsk oil refineries and the Samara oil depot, impacting RF fuel supply. SBU and SSO drones also halted several oil pumping stations.
• Effective Defensive Holding Actions: Repelled majority of RF assaults on Pokrovsk, Novopavlivka, Orikhiv, Kherson, Kursk, and North Slobozhansky directions.
• Effective Drone Operations in Sumy: UAF FPV drones successfully disrupted RF rotation and ammunition supply near Malaya Korchakovka, Sumy Oblast, inflicting casualties and equipment damage. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Territorial Gains: Liberated Pankivka and Zarichne (Donetsk Oblast), and 160 sq km with 7 settlements in the Dobropillya area.
• Significant RF Personnel/Equipment Losses: Destroyed RF Buk-M2 SAM system, eight RF assault troops, multiple RF positions/vehicles/equipment by FPV drones, and 4 Shaheds. UAF drones drove an RF soldier to suicide. Intercepted two RF boats with landing forces near Kherson. RF losses confirmed on the Slaviansk direction. MoD Russia's own mislabeled video (showing destroyed RF equipment) is an indirect confirmation of UAF success. Radio intercepts from Sumy Oblast further confirm RF casualties ("200s, burned") and equipment failures ("My L200 is stuck") due to UAF FPV drone activity. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• POW Captures: 'SKELYA' regiment captured 17 RF POWs.
• Counter-Intelligence: Detained a saboteur in Druzhkivka. SBU placed Dmitry Patrushev on a wanted list. (FACT, TASS Report citing SBU, Confidence: HIGH)
• Diplomatic Success: Zelenskyy's meetings with ambassadors indicate continued strong international support. Ukraine also sanctioned key RF propagandists. UAF highlights strong statements from NATO leaders (Czech President Pavel). Finland's President Stubb reiterates that security guarantees for Ukraine require readiness to fight Russia. (FACT, RBC-Ukraine, Confidence: HIGH).
• Electronic Warfare (EW): Successfully jammed RF radio communications, causing "complete confusion" and degrading enemy C2.

Setbacks:

• Civilian Casualties from RF Strikes (CRITICAL): Significant civilian casualties from RF attacks, including 3 dead and 36 injured in Dnipro (cluster munitions), 1 killed and 8 injured in Chernihiv/oblast (including 6 injured, 3 medics, from a drone attack), 1 killed in Khmelnytskyi, 4 killed in Samara Oblast (RF territory), and injuries in Zaporizhzhia, Poltava, Boryspil, and Konstantinovka (5 killed by КАБ strike, widespread destruction). Police and medics in Chernihiv Oblast were subjected to repeated shelling.
• RF Territorial Gains: Confirmed loss of Berëzovoye, Dnipropetropavsk Oblast, to RF forces. RF also claims control of Yastrebinoe in Sumy Oblast, advances on the Lyman direction, and fortified areas near Khatne in Kharkiv Oblast.
• Infrastructure Damage: Widespread damage to civilian infrastructure across multiple oblasts, including residential buildings, logistics centers, gas stations, and power outages. The confirmed hit on an ATB warehouse in Dnipro adds to the destruction. RF Lancet drone strike on a UAF engineering vehicle is a loss of critical support equipment. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Air Defense System Loss: RF claims destruction of a UAF S-300PS air defense system in Chernihiv Oblast.
• Unexploded Ordnance: Discovery of dangerous UXO on Khortytsia Island.
• POW Capture in Volchansk: A UAF border guard was captured by RF forces in the Volchansk area. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: MEDIUM) This is a tactical loss.
• Kinetic Activity in Sumy: Reports of explosions in Sumy (РБК-Україна) indicate UAF forces are under continued direct kinetic pressure in this region. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
• Air Threat in Odesa: Air alert declared in Odesa Oblast implies an immediate threat from RF aerial assets. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints (Confidence: HIGH)

• Air Defense Systems & Munitions (CRITICAL): The massive overnight RF air attack demonstrates the urgent need for more advanced air defense systems (including F-16s) and interceptor munitions to counter saturated attacks across a wide geographic area. The US decision to suspend Patriot sales to Europe to stockpile for itself is a significant constraint.
• Anti-Drone Capabilities (HIGH): The sheer volume of RF UAVs necessitates continuous enhancement of UAF's anti-drone capabilities, including EW systems, mobile air defense, and counter-UAV munitions. Czechia's decision to create a special group against RF drones indicates a recognition of this need by allies. UAF FPV drones are proving highly effective in sectors like Sumy, but sustained supply and training are essential.
• Artillery Ammunition (HIGH): Sustained heavy ground combat on multiple axes demands a continuous high demand for artillery ammunition.
• Fuel and Energy Infrastructure Protection (HIGH): UAF deep strikes on RF refineries will likely trigger RF retaliation, requiring strengthened protection for Ukraine's own remaining energy infrastructure.
• Logistical Support (HIGH): Continued high-intensity combat demands robust and secure logistical chains to resupply frontline units. Fundraising by the Rubizh Brigade and the urgent appeal for the 59th OSHB indicate critical needs for external support, including medical supplies and personnel. Continued reliance on volunteer support for Starlink and other critical equipment is ongoing. The loss of an engineering vehicle further highlights the need for robust logistical and maintenance capabilities. The effectiveness of UAF drones in disrupting RF logistics in Sumy underscores the importance of continued support for these capabilities.
• Diplomatic Support (HIGH): Continued engagement with international partners is crucial for maintaining sanctions pressure on RF and advancing mechanisms for frozen asset transfers.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns (Confidence: HIGH)

• RF:

  • Denial/Blame Shifting: Denies targeting civilians, blames UAF air defense, or accuses UAF of war crimes (e.g., arson in Kirovsk, alleged crimes in Sudzha district, Kursk Oblast, preparing "provocative materials" in Sumy).
  • Exaggerated Gains/Successes: Amplifies claims of advances, "liberations" (Berëzovoye, Yastrebinoe, Serebryansky forestry, fortified areas near Khatne), and successful strikes (TOS-1A, S-300PS destruction, Lancet strikes on UAF engineering equipment, destruction of UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast). Uses narratives of internal pro-RF sentiment (train message) and visually implies decisive combat. Claims ongoing systematic occupation south/southeast of Konstantinovka. Claims "Center" and "East" groups are the most successful. Promotes image of RF industrial capacity (MC-21 aircraft production). Promotes "Zarnitsa 2.0" as a massive success for patriotic youth. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Discrediting UAF: Portrays UAF mobilization as coercive, personnel as untrained, commanders as detached. Exploits POW statements to depict UAF as inhumane. Claims UAF censors missing personnel information. Uses narratives of "language discrimination" and demographic decline. Uses highly derogatory and racist content against Ukrainians. Claims a Ukrainian national shot and killed police officers. Actively exploits captured UAF personnel (Volchansk POW) to promote anti-Bandera, anti-Zelensky, and anti-Ukrainian nationalist narratives. Frames UAF actions like placing Dmitry Patrushev on a wanted list as evidence of Ukrainian aggression.
  • Sowing Discord/Weakening NATO: Exploits perceived NATO divisions (Patriot sales suspension, alleged aid cuts to Baltics), amplifies Trump's critical statements (e.g., US wanting Bagram Airbase return to Afghanistan, his uncertainty on Estonian airspace violation, his views on a US government shutdown), and uses sarcastic diplomatic remarks. Probes NATO airspace and conducts cyberattacks. Claims Germany's AfD is gaining influence. Leverages statements from figures like Alexander Stubb to imply NATO internal disagreements on how to deal with Russia. Trump claims the US is pushing European allies to stop buying RF oil, which, regardless of veracity, can sow distrust among allies. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). Senator Pushkov directly counters President Stubb's comments, asserting that resolution of the Ukrainian crisis is impossible without Russia's participation due to security concerns. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). This is a direct RF diplomatic counter-narrative. The reported discovery of another Russian drone in Poland near Kaliningrad (RMF24 via Операция Z) can be used to imply NATO is overreacting or that RF is testing boundaries without aggressive intent, further sowing discord. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Portraying RF as Benevolent/Strong: Putin's public appearances, cultural events (Intervision), and domestic policy announcements aim to project stability, strength, and national unity. Promotes "Faith on the SVO" and veteran support. Uses South Ossetian parade to project loyalty. Sending doctors to occupied territories. Claims ZNPP can restore stable external power independently, projecting self-sufficiency and control. The video message from Viktor Vodolatsky highlights narratives of voluntary participation in 2022 referendums and critical tone towards Ukrainian leadership, intended to legitimize annexation. (FACT, TASS REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). TASS reporting on the МВД РФ warning about online fraudsters targeting children aims to show the state's concern for public safety and children's well-being, projecting a benevolent and effective government. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Global Narrative Shaping: Shifts focus to other conflicts (Gaza) and leverages diplomatic tensions to portray a shifting global order. Uses UK's potential recognition of Palestine as a distraction.
  • Internal Control & Repression: Designates critical Z-bloggers as "foreign agents" and arrests for "terrorism" to control information. Uses "BreakingNews" and "WARNING" messages.
  • Weaponized Internal Criticism: Posts that appear to be internal criticism (e.g., "Russian Reconquista" comments) can be used to manage expectations or deflect blame.
  • Amplification of Negative US News: Reports on unrelated US domestic events (crime, politics) to divert attention and portray Western societies as chaotic. Trump's willingness to meet with Democrats to prevent a government shutdown is presented, with his simultaneous belief in the futility of such contacts. This is framed to highlight US internal political instability. (FACT, TASS REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Mislabeled Drone Footage: MoD Russia posted UAF drone footage of destroyed RF equipment, mislabeled, to conceal losses.
  • Domestic Policy Focus: TASS report on stricter state control over managing companies for apartment buildings indicates a focus on internal governance and stability, likely intended for domestic consumption to project effective leadership during wartime.

• UAF:

  • Highlighting RF Atrocities: Reports civilian casualties and infrastructure damage from RF strikes (Dnipro cluster munitions, Konstantinovka destruction, attacks on medics).
  • Emphasizing Air Defense Success: Consistent reporting of high interception rates, particularly F-16s, to boost morale.
  • Showcasing Tactical Successes: Promotes successful drone operations, special operations (GUR behind enemy lines), and POW captures. Uses graphic footage of RF soldier suicide by drone as psychological warfare. UAF will likely amplify the RF radio intercept from Sumy Oblast showing their drone effectiveness and RF disarray. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT).
  • Counter-Offensive Narrative: Zelenskyy's reports on liberated territories and frontline engagements maintain a narrative of active resistance.
  • Morale Boosting & Resilience: Campaigns celebrating heroes, showcasing training, and highlighting civilian support for the war effort. Uses prominent figures like Usyk. Display of military insignia/patches from the "SVO zone" by Colonelcassad. (FACT, COLONELCASSAD, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Exposing RF Weaknesses: Publicizes RF economic vulnerabilities (budget deficit, manpower shortages) to undermine perception of strength. Highlights RF's need to bring in doctors to occupied territories, exposing resource strain. The radio intercept from Sumy Oblast exposing RF equipment failure, casualties, and logistical disruption due to UAF drones will be highly valuable for UAF IO. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT).
  • Diplomatic Engagement: Zelenskyy's meetings and statements on sanctions reinforce commitment to international law and global support. Sanctions RF propagandists. Highlights strong NATO statements. Finnish President Stubb's statement about readiness to fight Russia is amplified as a sign of resolute international support. (FACT, RBC-Ukraine, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Command Control: Public statements from UAF leadership maintain clear internal communication and control over information. Announces new drone assault troop branch.
  • Immediate Threat Alerting: UAF Air Force issuing warnings about enemy UAVs in northern Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts demonstrates rapid and transparent threat communication to the public. Reporting on explosions in Sumy indicates transparent reporting of ongoing threats. Continued alerts about UAVs and tactical aviation confirm vigilance. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). An air alert in Odesa further confirms UAF's rapid public alerting system. A general "Attention!" alert from UAF Air Force (РБК-Україна) indicates effective and rapid public alerting. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). UAF Air Force reports of enemy tactical aviation activity in the southeast are transparent threat communications. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
  • International Diplomatic Support: Citing statements from leaders like Alexander Stubb, emphasizing that RF should not influence Ukraine's security guarantees.
  • Targeting High-Value Individuals: SBU placing Dmitry Patrushev on a wanted list is a significant IO move, aimed at demonstrating UAF's reach and ability to target key RF figures.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors (Confidence: HIGH)

• Ukrainian Public Sentiment: Severely impacted by repeated, massive, and indiscriminate RF air attacks. However, high air defense interception rates, successful deep strikes, and effective UAF tactical operations bolster national resilience. Strong civilian support for UAF through fundraising and volunteering continues. Public outrage over attacks on emergency responders. The capture of a UAF border guard will be used by RF to undermine morale. The ongoing drone threats, such as the ones in Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts, and kinetic activity in Sumy, contribute to public anxiety but also reinforce the need for vigilance. The incident of "Glory to Russia" graffiti on a train in Kyiv is a minor but notable attempt at pro-RF subversion that local authorities are actively addressing, indicating a low tolerance for such displays. Public sentiment is buoyed by strong statements of international support, such as President Stubb's. (FACT, RBC-Ukraine, Confidence: HIGH). The air alert in Odesa will contribute to public anxiety but also reinforce the perception of a constant threat requiring vigilance and resilience. The general "Attention!" alert from UAF Air Force will heighten public awareness and anxiety regarding air threats. (ANALYTICAL JUDGMENT).
• Russian Public Sentiment: Authorities maintain a facade of national unity and military success. However, UAF deep strikes causing casualties in RF territory and drone sightings create alarm. Internal dissent (Alekhin foreign agent status) suggests limits to information control. Coercive recruitment, unsanitary conditions, and internal criticism could negatively affect military morale and public willingness to serve. Cultural events (Intervision, "Zarnitsa 2.0") aim to distract and unify. C2 degradation (radio confusion), particularly tactical-level breakdowns as seen in Sumy Oblast, could significantly impact military morale and confidence in command. Leaflet drops in Chernihiv suggest RF believes segments of the Ukrainian population are susceptible to subversion. Civilian unrest in Donbas over road repairs indicates discontent. Graphic dehumanizing propaganda (Sudzha district claims, Sumy claims) aims to desensitize. The broadcast of POW interrogations and statements from Viktor Vodolatsky aim to reinforce anti-Ukrainian sentiment and justify the "special military operation." Internal policies on housing management (TASS report) could be aimed at addressing domestic concerns to maintain social stability. Claims about ZNPP self-sufficiency aim to reassure the public about RF control of critical infrastructure. The МВД РФ warning about online fraudsters manipulating children online could cause concern among parents and the general public, though it may also reinforce the image of a state concerned with its citizens. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH).
• International Public Sentiment: Significant concern among NATO allies regarding RF's aggressive hybrid operations (Estonian airspace violation, cyberattacks). Strong condemnation from individual NATO leaders (Czech President Pavel, Alexander Stubb) indicates hardening stance. US Patriot sales suspension raises questions about aid sustainability. Trump's statements are divisive and exploited by RF. Trump's stated uncertainty on the Estonian airspace violation could be perceived as indecision, which RF may seek to exploit. Discussions on frozen RF assets underscore commitment but also complexities. Cyberattack on European airports, if linked to RF, could harden anti-RF sentiment. UK's potential recognition of Palestine might be perceived as a distraction or shift in global focus. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). Trump's public comments on US government shutdown and his assessment of political contacts as "meaningless" also indicate internal US political instability that RF may attempt to amplify. (FACT, TASS REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). Trump's claims the US is pressing European allies to stop buying RF oil, if widely believed, could cause friction among allies. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). Senator Pushkov's statement reflects RF's understanding of international diplomatic exchanges and its attempt to shape the narrative regarding peace talks. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). The discovery of another Russian drone in Poland near Kaliningrad (RMF24 via Операция Z) will likely increase international concerns about RF's aggressive actions and border security. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH). The Serbian military parade showcasing Russian and Israeli weapons (РБК-Україна) could be interpreted by some as a challenge to Western influence in the Balkans or a statement of non-alignment, potentially causing minor friction with Western nations. (FACT, RBC-Ukraine, Confidence: LOW - analytical judgment based on headline).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments (Confidence: HIGH)

• Positive for Ukraine:
  • NATO Response: Poland and other nations joining NATO's "Eastern Sentry." Czech President Pavel's strong statements on shooting down RF jets. Estonia's border closure proposal. Czechia creating special group against RF drones. Alexander Stubb emphasizes that RF should not influence security guarantees for Ukraine and that such guarantees require readiness to fight Russia. (FACT, RBC-Ukraine, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Diplomatic Engagements: Zelenskyy's active diplomatic schedule (ambassadors from Czechia, Norway, Germany). White House plans for bilateral talks with Trump, Ash-Shaara, and Zelenskyy. Zelenskyy discusses impending 19th sanctions package.
  • Sanctions & Financial Aid: US bill to transfer frozen Russian assets. EU considering restrictions on "Druzhba" pipeline oil supplies. Ukraine sanctions RF propagandists.
  • Military Aid/Adaptation: NATO's contract for EW planning software. Poland/Romania acquiring Merops air surveillance systems.
• Negative for Ukraine / Challenging:
  • US Patriot Sales Suspension: US suspending Patriot sales to Europe to stockpile for itself creates a potential constraint on future air defense supplies.
  • Trump's Influence: Trump's statements about US profiting from the war create uncertainty and are exploited by RF. His alleged belief that Xi Jinping will help resolve the war could signal a shift towards brokered peace deals. RF IO amplifies claims of aid cuts to Baltics. Trump's threats regarding Bagram Airbase are a direct and coercive US foreign policy adaptation. Trump stating he hasn't been briefed on the Estonian airspace violation and wants to "figure it out" signals a potential lack of clear US leadership on NATO border security, which RF may exploit. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). Trump's comments on the US government shutdown and his assessment of political contacts as "meaningless" also indicate internal US political instability that RF may exploit. (FACT, TASS REPORT, Confidence: HIGH). Trump claims the US is pressing European allies to stop buying RF oil, which could complicate allied relations if perceived as overreach. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH).
  • RF Hybrid Provocations: RF MiG-31 airspace violation of Estonia (confirmed by Pentagon) and large cyberattack on European airports directly challenge NATO, diverting attention and resources. The alleged discovery of a tunnel near the Polish border could be leveraged by RF IO. The discovery of another Russian drone in Poland near Kaliningrad reinforces concern about persistent RF provocations/probing near NATO borders. (FACT, RF REPORT citing Polish media, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Iran-IAEA Cooperation Suspension: Iran's decision to suspend cooperation with IAEA following renewed sanctions is a significant diplomatic development that could divert international attention and resources away from Ukraine, and potentially impact energy markets.
  • UK Recognition of Palestine: If confirmed, the UK's recognition of Palestine could shift international diplomatic focus and resources, potentially away from Ukraine. (FACT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH)
  • Serbia's Military Parade (New): A military parade in Serbia showcasing weapons from both Israel and Russia could be perceived as Serbia maintaining a neutral stance or leaning towards a multi-vector foreign policy, potentially challenging EU/NATO influence in the Balkans. (FACT, RBC-Ukraine, Confidence: LOW - analytical judgment based on headline).
• RF Diplomatic/Geopolitical Activities:
  • Testing NATO Unity: RF continues to test NATO's resolve and unity through provocations and IO. RF will exploit statements like Alexander Stubb's to sow discord, potentially arguing that NATO is already divided. RF will exploit Trump's comments on the Estonian airspace violation and US government shutdown to sow doubt about NATO's resolve and US commitment. Senator Pushkov directly asserts that resolution of the Ukrainian crisis is impossible without Russia, directly countering any narrative of excluding RF from peace processes. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Global Alignments: RF promotes narratives of new alliances (Turkey-Russia-China) and leverages international conflicts (Gaza) and diplomatic tensions (Iran-IAEA) to its advantage. Putin congratulates South Ossetian President, holds parade. RF leverages Vietnam's victory in Intervision for soft power. RF amplifies US drone proliferation to Taiwan.
  • Soft Power & Image Building: "Intervision" music contest is a significant soft power initiative. RF highlights industrial achievements (MC-21 production). "Zarnitsa 2.0" youth program.
  • Denial of Aggression: RF consistently denies provocations (Estonian airspace violation, Polish drone incident).
  • Internal Political Stability: Putin's engagements and domestic policy initiatives aim to project internal stability. TASS regional information center in Rostov-on-Don. Putin allocates funds to South Ossetian schools. TASS reporting on stricter state control over apartment building management companies signals domestic policy focus. TASS reporting on МВД РФ warning about online fraudsters targeting children reinforces the image of a state concerned with internal security and public well-being. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH).
  • Armenian PM Pashinyan disagrees with "hybrid war" narrative against RF.
• Other: IOC banned Russian athletes from team competitions at the 2026 Winter Olympics.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

MLCOA 1: Continued Massive Combined Air/Missile Attacks with Focus on Western Ukraine & Civilian Centers (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• Action: RF will likely sustain a campaign of large-scale, combined missile and UAV attacks (including cruise, ballistic, and КАБ munitions, with continued use of cluster munitions against civilian targets). These attacks will target military-industrial complexes, logistical hubs, and critical energy infrastructure, but will also indiscriminately target residential areas to degrade civilian morale and exhaust UAF air defense resources. The geographic focus will likely broaden, maintaining pressure on eastern and central oblasts while increasing deep strikes into western Ukraine, particularly towards strategic targets like Stryi. RF will continue to claim precision strikes against military targets, blaming UAF air defense for any civilian casualties. RF tactical aviation will sustain КАБ launches in frontline oblasts. RF will continue large-scale strikes on Ukrainian defense industry, as implied by videos titled "Nightmare of Ukrainian Defense Industry." RF will continue to claim strikes on military targets in Dnipropetropavsk (e.g., "Agro-Soyuz," UAF dugouts, hexacopters). The detection of enemy UAVs in northern Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts (moving south) and general UAV/tactical aviation alerts (including specific activity in the southeast) indicate an immediate and ongoing intent for reconnaissance or targeting in that region, potentially preceding further air strikes or ground actions. RF will continue to utilize Lancet drones effectively against UAF military equipment, including engineering vehicles. UAF Air Force alerts, such as the recent one in Odesa and the general "Attention!" alert, indicate this threat is persistent. (FACT, RF REPORT, UAF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Reasoning: The overnight attack demonstrates RF's enhanced capability and willingness to employ such a strategy. The confirmed use of cluster munitions on a residential building marks a severe escalation in targeting civilians. RF aims to exhaust UAF air defense while degrading Ukraine's economic and military capacity. The current weather conditions are favorable for air operations.
• Indicators: Continued air raid alerts across multiple oblasts, particularly in western and central Ukraine; visual confirmation of extensive civilian damage; RF reports of successful strikes on "military-industrial targets" or "dugouts/hexacopters"; continued UAV activity, especially in border regions (Chernihiv, Kharkiv) and tactical aviation activity (southeast); further RF reports/videos of drone strikes on UAF equipment.

MLCOA 2: Sustained Multi-Axis Ground Offensives, Prioritizing Pokrovsk, Novopavlivka, Dnipropetropavsk, and New Pressure in Kharkiv/Sumy Axes (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• Action: RF will maintain high-tempo ground offensives across multiple axes. Key efforts will focus on consolidating the recent gain in Berëzovoye and exploiting this foothold to push further into Dnipropetropavsk Oblast, supported by localized artillery and drone strikes (e.g., against UAF dugouts and hexacopters). Pressure on the Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka directions will remain extremely high, aiming for tactical breakthroughs or to attrit UAF defenders. Renewed, localized assaults are probable in the Kupiansk, Lyman (targeting Shandryholove, Serednye, Novoselivka), Siversk, and Sumy border regions (including continued fire activity as seen in Sumy, and "sluggish attacks" as claimed by RF), despite documented tactical difficulties for RF units in Sumy due to UAF drones. New pressure points could emerge in Kharkiv Oblast, leveraging recent claimed advances near Khatne and continued UAV reconnaissance. RF will employ heavy artillery (including TOS-1A), FPV drones, and UGVs to support these offensives. RF claims to have destroyed UAF fortified areas near Konstantinovka, indicating sustained pressure there. RF will continue offensive operations on the Krasnoarmeysk-Novopavlovka axis. RF special forces will continue to support offensives beyond Chasiv Yar. RF will highlight the successes of its "Center" and "East" groups to justify continued offensive actions. The detected UAVs in northern Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts and tactical aviation in the southeast could be preceding ground reconnaissance or offensive actions in those sectors.
• Reasoning: RF has demonstrated its ability to achieve tactical gains and holds the operational initiative on these axes. The "Sever" Group's training indicates preparations for continued assault operations. The ongoing efforts by RF military bloggers to fundraise for frontline units also suggest sustained operational tempo. RF aims to exhaust UAF resources and achieve territorial objectives, leveraging any perceived confusion in UAF defense. The radio intercept from Sumy Oblast shows RF's ongoing ground presence and intent to conduct operations, despite UAF's effective resistance. (FACT, RF REPORT, Confidence: HIGH).
• Indicators: Continued high numbers of RF assaults reported by UAF General Staff; RF claims of further territorial gains or destruction of UAF strongholds; intense artillery and drone activity in contested sectors, particularly Sumy and Kharkiv. WarGonzo maps will likely show contested urban areas on the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmeyskoye) direction.

MLCOA 3: Intensified Information Warfare and Hybrid Operations to Undermine NATO and Ukraine (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• Action: RF will significantly intensify its information warfare campaign, both domestically and internationally. This will include:
  • Domestic: Continued efforts to present a unified, successful war effort (Putin's visits, cultural events, veteran support), while actively silencing dissent (e.g., "foreign agent" designations) and exploiting any domestic incidents (Dagestan fire, Moscow school collapse, new housing management regulations, train derailment in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, online fraud against children) to project stability or divert attention. RF will promote internal narratives of "Faith on the SVO" and nationalistic appeals. RF will frame UAF's actions against Dmitry Patrushev as hostile aggression. The "Zarnitsa 2.0" program will be used to foster long-term patriotic and militaristic sentiment.
  • International: Aggressively exploit and amplify perceived divisions or weaknesses within NATO (e.g., US Patriot sales suspension, Trump's statements, alleged aid cuts to Baltic states, Trump's demand for Bagram Airbase return to Afghanistan, Trump's uncertainty on Estonian airspace violation, US government shutdown issues, Trump's claims about US pressing Europe to stop RF oil purchases) to undermine alliance cohesion and public support for Ukraine. They will deny all provocations (Estonian airspace violation, Polish drone incident) and shift blame onto NATO. RF will use highly derogatory and racist propaganda against Ukraine and amplify international geopolitical issues. RF will leverage captured UAF personnel (e.g., from Volchansk) for propaganda videos designed to undermine Ukrainian morale and nationalist narratives. RF will continue to generate and disseminate false claims of Ukrainian war crimes, particularly in border regions like Kursk and Sumy Oblasts, and exploit any signs of pro-RF sentiment within Ukraine (e.g., "Glory to Russia" on a train). RF will also amplify any diplomatic shifts (e.g., UK recognizing Palestine, Serbia's military parade) to portray a shifting global order and divert attention from Ukraine. RF will attempt to portray any discussions about Ukraine's security guarantees where RF is excluded as illegitimate or indicative of Western arrogance, as exemplified by Senator Pushkov's statement. RF will also claim self-sufficiency and control over critical infrastructure like ZNPP to influence international perceptions.
  • Hybrid Operations: Expect further, possibly more subtle or deniable, hybrid provocations against NATO's eastern flank (e.g., increased GPS jamming, cyberattacks on civilian infrastructure, continued airspace probing) to test NATO's response without triggering direct military conflict. The recent drone discovery near Kaliningrad reinforces this.
• Reasoning: RF has consistently demonstrated a sophisticated and aggressive approach to information warfare. The recent airspace violation and cyberattacks indicate a clear intent to probe and destabilize NATO. RF aims to exhaust international support for Ukraine, while solidifying domestic backing for the war.
• Indicators: Increased RF state media output focusing on "Western failures" and "RF successes"; diplomatic statements from RF officials denying provocations; new, unattributed cyber incidents in Europe; further airspace violations; proliferation of anti-Ukrainian propaganda online, especially narratives of discrimination, internal unrest, and demographic challenges; immediate release of propaganda videos featuring newly captured UAF personnel; increased frequency of claims of UAF "war crimes" (including Sumy); increased RF commentary on global geopolitical events unrelated to Ukraine, such as the UK-Palestine development or Serbia's military parade; RF messaging regarding ZNPP.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

MDCOA 1: Strategic Breakthrough on a Key Axis and Exploitation (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

• Action: RF achieves a decisive, deep breakthrough on one of the most heavily contested axes (e.g., Pokrovsk-Dnipropetropavsk, or potentially a renewed push towards Kupiansk-Kharkiv), overwhelming UAF defenses. This breakthrough could be achieved through a concentration of forces, surprise tactical maneuvers, or a significant degradation of UAF reserves. Exploitation would involve rapid advance of mechanized forces to seize critical logistical nodes, key terrain, or encircle UAF formations. This could be accompanied by a surge in FAB glide bomb attacks to clear the path for ground forces. The newly gained foothold in Berëzovoye could be expanded into a major push into Dnipropetropavsk. The reported degradation of RF C2, if unaddressed by UAF exploitation, could lead to unexpected command failures on the UAF side, enabling such a breakthrough.
• Reasoning: RF currently holds the initiative and is applying extreme pressure, particularly on Pokrovsk. A strategic breakthrough, while costly, could significantly alter the operational picture. The "Sever" Group's training indicates readiness for such large-scale offensive operations. RF destruction of UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast could be a preparatory step for further ground advances.
• Indicators: Sudden, rapid RF territorial gains (5-10+ km in a single day) verified by multiple sources; reports of UAF units being overrun or large-scale retreats; significant increases in RF air support (especially glide bombs) on a single axis.

MDCOA 2: Coordinated Mass Cyber-Attack on NATO Military C2 and Infrastructure (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

• Action: RF launches a highly sophisticated, coordinated cyber-attack targeting critical NATO military Command and Control (C2) systems, logistics networks, and potentially air defense integration platforms. This could involve direct disruption, data exfiltration, or the implantation of logic bombs to be activated at a critical moment. This would severely degrade NATO's ability to coordinate and respond effectively to any emerging military situation, creating a window of vulnerability.
• Reasoning: The recent large-scale cyberattack on European airports demonstrates RF's capability and willingness to target critical infrastructure. A move to military C2 would be a significant escalation but consistent with hybrid warfare doctrine to paralyze an adversary. The geopolitical context of the Estonian airspace violation and the Polish drone incident makes such an attack plausible as a pre-emptive measure or a response to perceived NATO escalations. NATO's contract for EW planning software indicates a recognition of this threat.
• Indicators: Widespread and simultaneous outages or disruptions of military communication systems, air traffic control, or other critical infrastructure within NATO member states; intelligence revealing unusual RF cyber activity patterns targeting military networks; public statements from NATO acknowledging a severe cyber incident impacting operational capabilities.

MDCOA 3: Deliberate Escalation of Provocations Against NATO (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

• Action: RF initiates a sustained campaign of more overt and less deniable military provocations across NATO's eastern flank. This could involve multiple, simultaneous airspace violations by various aircraft types, persistent and wide-area GPS jamming impacting civilian and military navigation, and limited cross-border incursions by non-state actors or disguised military personnel, possibly supported by drone operations. The aim would be to directly challenge NATO's Article 5 red line and create a crisis that forces NATO into a defensive, reactive posture, while simultaneously testing their resolve and unity. This could also include a direct military incident against a NATO asset (e.g., targeting a reconnaissance aircraft in international airspace). The suspension of Iran-IAEA cooperation, if it leads to increased global instability, could provide cover or distraction for such RF actions. Trump's statements about US foreign policy priorities (e.g., Bagram Airbase, uncertainty on Estonian airspace violation, US government shutdown) could further embolden RF. Trump's claims about the US pressing Europe to stop RF oil purchases could also exacerbate tensions and provide justification for RF actions. (FACT, TASS, Confidence: HIGH). The discovery of another Russian drone in Poland near Kaliningrad is a direct precursor to this MDCOA.
• Reasoning: The recent MiG-31 incursion into Estonia, assessed by the Pentagon as deliberate, indicates a willingness to directly challenge NATO. The political environment, with potential shifts in US foreign policy (Trump's statements), could embolden RF to test alliance cohesion more aggressively. RF aims to exploit any perceived weakness or hesitation within NATO without triggering a full-scale conventional war.
• Indicators: Multiple, concurrent, and sustained airspace violations by RF aircraft over different NATO border states; prolonged and widespread GPS jamming across the Baltic region; confirmed cross-border incursions by military personnel or proxies into NATO territory; targeting of NATO military assets outside of Ukraine.

---

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize BDA of RF Air Campaign and Inform Allies: Immediately re-task all ISR assets (IMINT, SIGINT) to conduct a comprehensive BDA of all impact sites from the overnight strike. Focus on differentiating between confirmed military-industrial targets and indiscriminate strikes on civilian infrastructure to inform both UAF STRATCOM and international partners. Disseminate findings rapidly to highlight RF war crimes.
2. Reinforce Dnipropetropavsk and Northern Axes and Exploit RF C2/Logistical Degradation: Direct immediate dispatch of available operational reserves, particularly anti-tank and counter-mobility units, to stabilize the front around Berëzovoye, prevent RF exploitation of the breakthrough, and establish new defensive lines. Simultaneously, reinforce positions in northern Kharkiv Oblast, specifically around Khatne, and assess RF claims of advances. Maintain a high state of readiness in Sumy Oblast, leveraging documented UAF drone effectiveness to disrupt RF rotation, supply, and inflict casualties as evidenced by recent radio intercepts. Task EW units to maximize jamming of RF communications across all active sectors, particularly Dnipropetropavsk, Kharkiv, and Sumy, to further degrade their observed C2 confusion and exploit tactical breakdowns. Prioritize defense against RF claims of destroying UAF dugouts and hexacopters in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast, as this indicates sustained tactical pressure.
3. Disperse & Re-evaluate Air Defense Posture with F-16 Integration: UAF Air Defense must immediately assess remaining interceptor stocks, rapidly reposition mobile SAM batteries to counter follow-on strikes, and prioritize protection of assets in western Ukraine, which have been newly targeted by cruise missiles. Accelerate the integration of F-16s into the national air defense network and operational doctrine, leveraging their demonstrated effectiveness against cruise missiles. Maintain high alert status for critical southern cities like Odesa. Respond to the general "Attention!" air alert by increasing vigilance across all critical zones.
4. Launch Aggressive STRATCOM Response to RF Hybrid Warfare and Disinformation, Including Countering RF Diplomatic Narratives: Task STRATCOM to immediately amplify the Pentagon's confirmation of the deliberate nature of the RF airspace violation in Estonia. Coordinate with NATO partners to present a unified information front condemning this direct military provocation and the cyberattacks on European airports. Proactively counter RF narratives about "language discrimination," demographic shifts, and fabricated "war crimes" (e.g., Sudzha district, Kursk Oblast, Sumy Oblast) by highlighting Ukrainian unity and resilience and providing factual rebuttals. Leverage RF radio intercepts from Sumy Oblast as concrete evidence of RF battlefield difficulties and UAF effectiveness to counter RF disinformation on this axis. Counter RF misinformation about the MLRS strike in Chervone, Zaporizhzhia, by providing clear visual evidence of RF self-inflicted damage if confirmed. Immediately counter RF propaganda attempts leveraging the captured UAF border guard from Volchansk by highlighting RF's systematic human rights abuses of POWs and denying the legitimacy of forced statements. Publicly address and condemn any pro-RF subversive acts within Ukraine, such as the train graffiti incident, emphasizing national unity and swift law enforcement action. Proactively address RF attempts to leverage statements from international figures (e.g., Trump's uncertainty on Estonian airspace violation, Trump's claims about US pressing Europe to stop RF oil, US government shutdown issues) to create divisions or undermine support, by emphasizing the enduring commitment to Ukrainian sovereignty. Directly and publicly counter RF diplomatic narratives, such as Senator Pushkov's statement, by reaffirming Ukraine's sovereignty and the illegitimacy of RF demands to influence Ukraine's security guarantees. Counter RF narratives from figures like Viktor Vodolatsky by exposing their historical revisionism and justification of illegal referendums. Address the reported drone discovery in Poland by collaborating with Polish authorities and highlighting RF's disregard for international borders and airspace.
5. Accelerate Formation of Drone Assault Troops and Counter-Drone Capabilities: Expedite the manning, training, and equipping of the newly formalized drone assault troops and integrate Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) into frontline formations. Prioritize their initial deployment to the most heavily contested sectors, such as Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka, and critical border regions like Sumy Oblast, to leverage asymmetric advantages against RF massed infantry assaults and to counter RF UGV and Lancet drone deployments. Focus on training for anti-drone tactics for all frontline personnel.
6. Exploit RF POW Captures and Battlefield Intercepts for PSYOPs: Direct PSYOP to immediately develop and disseminate messaging based on the 17 new RF POWs captured near Pokrovsk and the soldier driven to suicide by drones. Additionally, integrate key insights from the RF radio intercept from Sumy Oblast, highlighting RF equipment failures, logistical breakdowns, and casualties due to UAF drone activity. Messaging should emphasize the high casualty rates, futility of RF assaults, the psychological impact of UAF tactics, and the disorganized nature of RF tactical operations to degrade enemy morale and encourage surrender. Counter RF narratives of UAF inhumanity with documented evidence of RF treatment of POWs.
7. Enhance Logistics and Resource Management: Intensify efforts to secure and protect critical logistical nodes and energy infrastructure against RF strikes. Proactively communicate resource needs to international partners, highlighting the impact of constraints like the US Patriot sales suspension. Continue to support and integrate volunteer aid efforts for frontline units. Prioritize replacement and protection of critical engineering vehicles susceptible to drone strikes.
8. Monitor International Geopolitical Shifts: Closely monitor the implications of Iran's suspension of IAEA cooperation and the UK's potential recognition of Palestine, as these could divert international attention and resources from Ukraine and potentially impact global energy stability, which RF may seek to exploit. Additionally, monitor the diplomatic implications of Serbia's military parade.
9. Increase ISR in Northern Kharkiv, Chernihiv, and Sumy Oblasts, and Southeastern Direction: Immediately task available ISR assets (aerial reconnaissance, ground patrols with thermal optics) to monitor the northern Kharkiv and Chernihiv Oblasts, focusing on the detected enemy UAVs' flight paths and potential areas of interest, as well as verifying RF claims of advances near Khatne. Maintain heightened ISR in Sumy Oblast to identify the source and intent of kinetic activity, and detect any potential cross-border incursions or force concentrations, building on recent tactical successes against RF ground forces. Prioritize identification of launch points, C2 nodes, and potential ground force concentrations to preempt further drone activity or cross-border incursions. Increase ISR on the southeastern direction to monitor enemy tactical aviation activity and detect any associated ground force movements or strike preparations.