Situation Report

SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 240600Z AUG 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• OVERALL OPERATIONAL PICTURE: UAF has experienced significant RF deep strikes overnight, with a ballistic missile and a large swarm of Shahed UAVs (72 total, 48 reportedly intercepted/suppressed) targeting Ukrainian territory from Tagangrog, Kursk, Millerovo, and Primorsko-Akhtarsk. This follows UAF's own deep strike campaign into RF territory targeting critical energy infrastructure. On the ground, intense fighting continues on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka axes. Canada's Prime Minister has arrived in Ukraine for Independence Day commemorations, signaling continued international support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

  • Ukrainian Airspace (General): RF launched 1x Iskander-M ballistic missile from Tagangrog and 72x Shahed-type UAVs (plus imitators) from Kursk, Millerovo, and Primorsko-Akhtarsk. UAF claims 0/1 Iskander-M intercepted and 48/72 Shahed UAVs shot down/suppressed. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Leningrad Oblast (Western RF): Previous UAF drone attack on Ust-Luga port causing flight delays at Pulkovo Airport. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Samara Oblast (Central RF): UAF drone strikes on the Syzran oil refinery confirmed by ASTRA. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Kharkiv Oblast (Northern Ukraine): Intense RF ground operations continue as per previous reports. Kharkiv ODA head confirms ongoing efforts to build a strong Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Malinovka (Southern/Eastern Ukraine): UAF 79th Brigade captured an RF prisoner from the 5th Brigade during storming operations, indicating active ground engagements. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• STRATEGIC MISSILE/UAV ACTIVITY:

  • RF Activity: Confirmed launch of 1x Iskander-M ballistic missile and 72x Shahed-type UAVs (plus imitators) against Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • UAF Activity: Previous confirmed UAV attacks on Kursk NPP, Ust-Luga port (Gazprom gas processing complex and Novatek terminal), and Syzran oil refinery. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Overnight RF ballistic missile and UAV operations indicate suitable weather for aerial attacks into Ukraine. The previous UAF deep strikes on the Kursk NPP and Ust-Luga port highlight the continued vulnerability of critical infrastructure to aerial assault, with potential environmental implications if damage is severe. The flight delays at Pulkovo airport suggest a weather/operational impact on civilian air traffic in response to security alerts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF:
  • Deep Strike Operations: RF has conducted a significant overnight deep strike operation, employing a ballistic missile and a large number of Shahed UAVs from multiple launch areas. This is a likely retaliatory response to recent UAF deep strikes into RF territory. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Airspace Control/Internal Security: Flights delayed at Pulkovo Airport (St. Petersburg) due to the previous attack on Leningrad Oblast, indicating continued disruption to civilian air traffic and reactive security measures. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Information Operations (IO): RF state media (TASS) reports on non-military topics (rescue operations, India-RF aviation), likely to divert attention from internal security issues. "AV БогомаZ" continues to frame UAF actions as "barbaric crimes." "Rybar" provides a morning situational overview. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Ground Operations: RF forces continue offensive operations on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka axes, with reports of intense fighting. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF:
  • Air Defense Operations: UAF Air Force reports successful interception/suppression of 48/72 Shahed UAVs and 0/1 Iskander-M missile, demonstrating active but not fully impervious air defense against massed attacks. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Deep Strike Operations (Previous): UAF confirmed previous deep strikes on critical RF energy infrastructure (Kursk NPP, Ust-Luga, Syzran). "KiberBoroshno" notes the Syzran refinery has been hit before. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Ground Operations: UAF units (e.g., 79th Brigade in Malinovka) are actively engaged in combat operations and taking prisoners. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Information Operations (IO): UAF channels (Оперативний ЗСУ, РБК-Україна) immediately report on RF missile/UAV attacks and UAF air defense successes. Independence Day messaging continues, with expressions of national resolve from President Zelenskyy, Kharkiv ODA, KMVA, and Zaporizhzhia OVA. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Diplomatic Engagement: The arrival of Canadian PM Mark Carney for Independence Day celebrations highlights continued Western support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Concerns over Western Weapon Use Restrictions: "Оперативний ЗСУ" and "STERNENKO" highlight WSJ reports that the Pentagon is blocking UAF use of long-range Western weapons against targets in RF, which is a significant operational constraint. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.4. Relevant Dempster-Shafer Beliefs (Updated)

• "Military Action: Drone Strike by Ukraine on Port Infrastructure in Leningrad Oblast": HIGHLY RELEVANT. Flight delays at Pulkovo. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Military Action: Drone Strike by Ukraine on Industrial Infrastructure in Samara Oblast": HIGHLY RELEVANT. UAF strikes on Syzran oil refinery. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Military Action: Drone Strike by Ukraine on Energy Infrastructure (Nuclear Power Plant) in Kursk Oblast": HIGHLY RELEVANT. Previous UAF strike on Kursk NPP. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Logistical Shift: Infrastructure Damage in [Location]": HIGHLY RELEVANT. Damage to Novatek terminal in Ust-Luga and Kursk NPP transformer. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "RF Counter-UAV Operations: Widespread Interception": Supported by UAF claims of 48/72 Shahed UAVs shot down/suppressed. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Psychological Impact: Morale Boost for Ukraine": Reinforced by UAF Independence Day messaging and successful deep strikes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• NEW BELIEF: "Military Action: Missile Strike by Russia on Ukraine": HIGHLY RELEVANT. Iskander-M launch. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• NEW BELIEF: "Military Action: Drone Strike by Russia on Ukraine": HIGHLY RELEVANT. Shahed UAV launches. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• NEW BELIEF: "Diplomatic Initiative: Agreement on Support for Ukraine between Ukraine and World Leaders" (0.044349): HIGHLY RELEVANT. Canadian PM visit. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• NEW BELIEF: "International Relations: Restrictions on Military Aid Use by Allies": HIGHLY RELEVANT. Pentagon blocking long-range strikes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities:
  • Persistent Deep Strike Capacity (Enhanced): RF has demonstrated an enhanced capacity for deep strikes, simultaneously employing ballistic missiles and a large swarm of Shahed UAVs from multiple launch points. This suggests robust logistical support and integrated targeting. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Active Air Defense, but Permeable (Continued): RF maintains an active air defense system, evidenced by flight restrictions, but remains vulnerable to UAF deep strike penetrations on critical infrastructure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Integrated Information Warfare: RF continues to employ overt propaganda, downplaying UAF successes, emphasizing RF capabilities, and framing UAF actions as "barbaric." (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Combined Arms Operations: RF maintains the capability to conduct combined arms assaults on ground axes (Kharkiv, Avdiivka) and localized engagements (Malinovka). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Intentions:
  • Retaliate for UAF Deep Strikes: The massed RF deep strike is a clear and immediate retaliation for UAF's successful targeting of RF energy infrastructure. RF intends to inflict significant damage on Ukrainian targets. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Degrade Ukrainian Air Defense & Infrastructure: The large volume of UAVs (72) aims to overwhelm and deplete Ukrainian air defenses, enabling missile penetration and inflicting damage on critical infrastructure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Defend Internal Territory & Critical Infrastructure: Continued reactive measures like airport delays indicate an intent to protect its internal territory, particularly vital economic and energy assets. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Boost Domestic Morale and Justify Operations: Propaganda efforts (e.g., "barbaric crimes") aim to reinforce domestic support for the war and portray RF as effectively managing the threat. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Maintain Pressure on Ground Axes & Fix UAF Reserves: RF intends to continue offensive operations on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka axes to fix Ukrainian reserves and achieve tactical gains, as evidenced by ongoing heavy fighting and UAF prisoner capture. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Courses of Action:
  • MLCOA 1: Sustain High-Tempo Attritional UAV and Missile Strikes Against Ukrainian Rear Areas, Prioritizing Energy, Agricultural, and Residential Infrastructure, and Civilian Targets. RF will maintain a high tempo of these strikes to deplete Ukrainian air defenses, disrupt logistics, and exert psychological pressure on the civilian population. Expect continued, potentially even more intense, waves of attacks in retaliation for UAF deep strikes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA 2: Intensify Information Operations, Particularly Those Designed to Portray RF Military Effectiveness, Downplay the Impact of UAF Deep Strikes, and Emphasize Successful Interceptions. Expect increased accusations of "terrorism" regarding UAF deep strikes and continued efforts to control the narrative of battlefield successes and defensive capabilities. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA 3: Reinforce Air Defense and Security around Critical Infrastructure, especially Nuclear Power Plants and Major Energy/Logistical Hubs. In direct response to the Kursk NPP attack and previous successful strikes on Ust-Luga and Syzran, RF will likely reallocate or bolster air defense assets to protect similar high-value targets, potentially leading to increased air defense activity and temporary flight restrictions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA 4: Continue Combined Arms Assaults on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka Axes, Fixing Ukrainian Reserves and Attempting to Widen Gains. RF will prioritize the Kharkiv axis, attempting to seize Vovchansk and expand their zone of control. Simultaneously, they will continue to press assaults west of Ocheretyne to widen the shoulders of the salient. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Massed Deep Strike Tactics: RF's overnight attack with a ballistic missile and 72 Shahed UAVs from multiple directions indicates an adaptation to overcome UAF air defenses through saturation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Propaganda Focus on "Ukrainian Barbarism": RF propaganda (AV БогомаZ) is rapidly framing UAF deep strikes as "barbaric crimes," intensifying the narrative to justify RF retaliatory actions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Continued Ground Pressure Despite Deep Strike Response: RF's simultaneous maintenance of ground offensives in Kharkiv and Avdiivka, while conducting a major deep strike, demonstrates an ability to sustain multi-domain pressure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• Sustained Deep Strike Logistical Chain: The ability to launch 1x Iskander-M and 72x Shahed UAVs from multiple geographically dispersed locations indicates a robust and sustained logistical chain for these assets. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Air Defense Logistics: RF internal air defense systems continue to expend significant resources, evidenced by the large number of claimed UAV interceptions (95 in previous report). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Logistical Support for Kharkiv: Confirmed logistical buildup in Belgorod Oblast continues to support the new Kharkiv offensive. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• Integrated Deep Strike C2: The coordinated launch of ballistic missiles and a large UAV swarm from geographically separate locations against Ukraine demonstrates effective C2 for complex, multi-modal deep strike operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Responsive Air Defense C2 (Reactive): Dynamic responses like flight delays at Pulkovo Airport indicate effective C2 for internal air security measures, albeit reactive rather than fully preventive. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Ground Forces C2: The continued offensive operations and capture of UAF prisoners confirm effective C2 for coordinating ground assaults and fire support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Active Air Defense: UAF Air Force demonstrates active air defense capabilities, successfully intercepting a significant portion of incoming Shahed UAVs, but the ballistic missile evaded interception. This highlights vulnerabilities against specific threats. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• High Morale and National Unity (Reinforced): Independence Day celebrations and messages from President Zelenskyy, Commander-in-Chief Syrskyi, and various regional administrations continue to reinforce national resilience and determination, essential for maintaining morale amidst escalating conflict and heavy RF deep strikes. The visit of the Canadian PM further boosts morale. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Defensive Posture in Kharkiv/Avdiivka (Under Strain): UAF forces remain engaged in heavy defensive fighting in Kharkiv Oblast and west of Avdiivka, facing sustained RF pressure and requiring the commitment of reserves. Capture of RF prisoners indicates active and effective resistance. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Strategic Deep Strike Offensive (Operational Constraint): UAF has demonstrated a sophisticated and sustained capability to inflict strategic costs on RF, but reports of the Pentagon blocking the use of long-range Western weapons against RF territory are a significant operational constraint that could limit future deep strike effectiveness. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Vulnerability to RF Rear Area Strikes (CRITICAL): The overnight Iskander-M and Shahed attacks highlight a critical and persistent vulnerability to RF deep strikes on civilian areas and infrastructure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • High Shahed Interception Rate: UAF successfully intercepted/suppressed 48 out of 72 Shahed UAVs, preventing broader damage. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Capturing RF Prisoner: The UAF 79th Brigade capturing an RF prisoner in Malinovka indicates successful ground combat operations and potential for intelligence gathering. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Diplomatic Support: The visit of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney for Independence Day celebrations is a significant diplomatic success, reaffirming international support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Strategic Deep Strike on Kursk NPP (Previous): The UAF drone attack on the Kursk NPP, causing a 50% power reduction of one block, is a significant strategic success. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Setbacks:
  • Iskander-M Penetration: The failure to intercept the Iskander-M ballistic missile is a significant setback, indicating a vulnerability to this specific threat. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Damage from Unintercepted Shaheds: 24 Shahed UAVs were not intercepted/suppressed, likely causing damage and casualties. Specific impact details are an intelligence gap. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Restrictions on Western Weapon Use: The alleged Pentagon blockage on using long-range Western weapons against RF territory is a major strategic and operational setback, limiting UAF's ability to respond symmetrically to RF aggression. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Continued RF Pressure on Ground Axes: Ongoing RF pressure on Kharkiv and Avdiivka continues to be an operational challenge. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Enhanced Ballistic Missile Defense (CRITICAL): The Iskander-M penetration highlights a critical and urgent requirement for more advanced and robust ballistic missile defense systems to protect major cities and critical infrastructure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Layered Air Defense for Rear Areas: The massed Shahed attack reinforces the critical need for enhanced and layered air defense systems to protect civilian populations and infrastructure in rear areas, especially against continued RF retaliatory strikes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Unrestricted Use of Western Capabilities: The alleged Pentagon restriction on using long-range Western weapons against RF territory is a major constraint that severely limits UAF's strategic options and capacity for effective retaliation. Advocacy for lifting this restriction is critical. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Counter-Disinformation Capability: Given RF's intensified information warfare efforts, UAF requires robust counter-disinformation capabilities to immediately counter RF claims and frame UAF actions appropriately. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Reinforcement for Kharkiv and Avdiivka: The sustained RF pressure on Kharkiv and west of Avdiivka necessitates the urgent allocation of additional personnel, artillery, and reserves to these critical sectors. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Propaganda:
  • Framing UAF Deep Strikes as "Barbaric": "AV БогомаZ" immediately frames UAF deep strikes as "barbaric crimes," a narrative designed to garner international sympathy and justify RF retaliatory actions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Downplaying Internal Impacts: TASS reports on non-military topics (panda, helicopter rescue) to distract from the domestic impact of UAF deep strikes and internal security concerns (e.g., airport delays). "Rybar" provides a routine operational overview, likely downplaying specific incidents. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Promoting Russian Resilience/Normalcy: Continued reporting on positive international relations (India-RF aviation) aims to project an image of normalcy and strength despite conflict. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Counter-Propaganda/Messaging:
  • Transparent Reporting of RF Aggression: UAF Air Force, Operatyvnyi ZSU, and RBK-Ukraina rapidly report on RF missile and UAV attacks and UAF air defense successes, exposing RF aggression. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • National Resilience Messaging (Reinforced): Independence Day messages from President Zelenskyy, Kharkiv ODA, KMVA, and Zaporizhzhia OVA emphasize unity, strength, and determination, directly countering RF narratives of Ukrainian weakness. These messages are vital for internal morale and international support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Highlighting Ally Constraints: UAF channels (Operatyvnyi ZSU, STERNENKO) actively highlight the WSJ report about the Pentagon blocking long-range strikes into RF, drawing attention to a critical operational constraint and potentially influencing international debate. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukrainian Public: The Iskander-M penetration and massed Shahed attack will cause significant anxiety, reinforcing the demand for improved air defense. However, the high Shahed interception rate will offer some reassurance. Independence Day celebrations, bolstered by the Canadian PM's visit, will reinforce national unity and resolve, counteracting some of the negative psychological impact of RF attacks. News of restrictions on Western weapons use against RF territory may cause frustration and questions about allied commitment. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Public: Flight delays at Pulkovo airport, alongside previous successful UAF deep strikes on critical energy infrastructure, will continue to fuel public anxiety about internal security. While state media attempts to downplay damage and distract, the cumulative effect of these incidents could erode public confidence in RF air defense capabilities. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• International Public: The attack on a nuclear power plant (Kursk NPP, from previous report) and continued RF mass strikes on Ukraine will maintain international concern. The WSJ report on Pentagon restrictions could spark debate about the effectiveness of current Western support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Sustained Western Political Support: The visit of Canadian PM Mark Carney to Ukraine for Independence Day celebrations is a strong political signal of continued Western solidarity and support, reinforcing Ukraine's diplomatic standing. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Constraints on Military Aid Effectiveness: The WSJ report on Pentagon restrictions regarding the use of long-range Western weapons against RF territory is a significant diplomatic development, highlighting a potential point of friction or policy constraint within the alliance supporting Ukraine. This could limit Ukraine's ability to exert symmetrical pressure on RF. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Diplomatic Efforts: TASS reports on improving relations with India (aviation) are part of RF's broader diplomatic strategy to diversify alliances and counter Western isolation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• US Senate Support for Ukraine: Senator Rubio's greeting for Ukraine's Independence Day reinforces bipartisan support in the US. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

• MLCOA 1: Sustain High-Tempo Attritional UAV and Missile Strikes Against Ukrainian Rear Areas, Prioritizing Energy, Agricultural, and Residential Infrastructure, and Civilian Targets. RF will maintain a high tempo of these strikes to deplete Ukrainian air defenses, disrupt logistics, and exert psychological pressure on the civilian population. Expect continued, potentially even more intense, waves of attacks in retaliation for UAF deep strikes, using a mix of ballistic missiles and Shahed UAVs. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Immediate and significant RF response overnight confirms this pattern. RF has the capabilities and demonstrated intent.
• MLCOA 2: Intensify Information Operations, Focusing on Discrediting UAF Deep Strikes, Portraying RF Air Defense Effectiveness, and Highlighting RF Battlefield Successes. RF media will continue to disseminate narratives emphasizing successful UAV interceptions, minimizing damage from UAF attacks, and promoting RF military achievements to control the domestic and international narrative. Expect increased accusations of "terrorism" regarding UAF deep strikes, especially the Kursk NPP incident, and portraying UAF actions as "barbaric." (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Immediate RF propaganda response to UAF deep strikes, consistent pattern of information warfare.
• MLCOA 3: Reinforce Air Defense Posture and Physical Security Around Critical Infrastructure in RF Territory, Particularly Nuclear Power Plants, Major Energy Facilities, and Ports. In response to successful UAF deep strikes, especially the Kursk NPP, RF will likely reallocate or bolster air defense assets and enhance physical security measures to protect these high-value targets. This could lead to increased air defense activity and temporary flight restrictions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Demonstrated vulnerability of critical infrastructure, strategic importance of nuclear power, and previous dynamic air defense responses. Pulkovo flight delays support this.
• MLCOA 4: Continue Combined Arms Assaults on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka Axes, Fixing Ukrainian Reserves and Attempting to Widen Gains. RF will prioritize the Kharkiv axis, attempting to seize Vovchansk and expand their zone of control to force the commitment of Ukrainian strategic reserves. Simultaneously, they will continue to press assaults west of Ocheretyne to widen the shoulders of the salient, threatening key Ukrainian logistical routes toward Pokrovsk. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Consistent RF targeting patterns, ongoing offensive actions, and the strategic objective to fix UAF reserves.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

• MDCOA 1: Escalated RF Retaliatory Strikes against UAF Air Bases, Deep Strike Launch Sites, Critical Infrastructure, or Government Facilities, Possibly with Strategic or Enhanced Conventional Assets, including a higher volume of Ballistic Missiles. In direct and aggressive retaliation for the strategically significant UAF deep strikes on critical RF energy infrastructure (Kursk NPP, Ust-Luga, Syzran) and potentially in response to the political constraints on UAF deep strikes, RF may conduct widespread precision strikes, possibly using strategic aviation, hypersonic missiles, or a higher volume of long-range ballistic and cruise missiles, against UAF airfields, munition depots, critical energy grids, or command and control centers to degrade UAF deep strike capabilities and punish Ukraine. The overnight Iskander-M launch is a precursor. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: RF's history of retaliatory strikes and clear intent to neutralize UAF capabilities. The successful UAF deep strikes on high-value, sensitive targets significantly increase the likelihood of a severe RF response. The Kursk NPP attack, in particular, touches upon highly sensitive security and political considerations for RF.
• MDCOA 2: Increased Hybrid Warfare Tactics and Covert Operations within Ukraine and Border Regions, Potentially targeting Critical Infrastructure with Sabotage. RF may escalate hybrid tactics by increasing covert operations and sabotage efforts against Ukrainian critical infrastructure (e.g., power grid, transportation hubs, telecommunications) within Ukraine, particularly in regions bordering RF or newly captured territories. This would be accompanied by intense disinformation campaigns blaming UAF for these actions, aimed at causing internal chaos and diverting UAF resources. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: The ongoing focus on critical infrastructure may spur increased covert activity, leveraging existing networks in occupied/border regions. The "looting in Kherson" narrative from previous reports could be a precursor.
• MDCOA 3: Rapid Operational Breakthrough on Kharkiv Axis, Exploiting UAF Force Reallocation and Logistical Weaknesses, Threatening Kharkiv City Directly. Should UAF be unable to effectively reinforce the Kharkiv axis due to the need to bolster air defense for rear areas (due to MDCOA 1) or sustain deep-strike operations, RF could achieve a faster than anticipated operational breakthrough. This would threaten key logistical nodes, potentially encircle UAF forces, or establish a deeper "buffer zone" that directly puts Kharkiv city under sustained artillery threat. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: The rapid opening of a new offensive axis indicates RF's intent to exploit UAF resource limitations. Confirmed logistical buildup in Belgorod supports such an objective.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Next 24 Hours:
  • RF Retaliatory Strikes: High probability of continued RF retaliatory missile/UAV strikes against Ukrainian cities or military targets. These may be more severe or widespread than previous waves, possibly employing a mix of ballistic and cruise missiles to overwhelm defenses. (DECISION POINT: UAF air defense commands to maintain maximum readiness and optimize resource allocation based on threat trajectories, with particular focus on protecting strategic assets, airfields, energy infrastructure, and major logistical nodes. Consider pre-emptive dispersal of vulnerable assets and prepare for ballistic missile engagements.)
  • RF Information Operation Escalation: Expect immediate and strong RF disinformation regarding UAF actions, particularly efforts to frame the Kursk NPP attack as "nuclear terrorism" and to aggressively promote high interception rates, while downplaying the impact of their own ballistic missile strikes. (DECISION POINT: Proactive UAF public affairs messaging to immediately counter RF narratives with verified information, emphasizing the legitimacy of targeting military-economic assets, while providing transparent updates on damage from RF attacks. Coordinate with international partners to contextualize RF claims.)
  • Kharkiv/Avdiivka Defensive Actions: Continue heavy defensive fighting on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka axes. (DECISION POINT: UAF operational commands to allocate necessary reserves and fire support to hold current defensive lines and counter RF advancements, balancing these needs with air defense requirements.)
• Next 48-72 Hours:
  • Impact Assessment of Deep Strikes: Continue to monitor official RF statements, OSINT, and IMINT for further details on the full extent of damage and operational impact to Kursk NPP, Ust-Luga (gas complex and Novatek terminal), and Syzran facilities. Focus on any secondary effects on RF energy generation, exports, or domestic supply. (DECISION POINT: UAF intelligence to analyze the strategic impact of these deep strikes for effectiveness of UAF capabilities and RF response.)
  • Logistical Prep for New Missiles: UAF forces will likely be preparing for the reception and integration of new ERAM missiles. (DECISION POINT: UAF logistics and air force commands to ensure secure reception, storage, and distribution of new missile systems, taking into account MDCOA 1 and the heightened threat of RF retaliatory strikes.)
  • RF Internal Security Adjustments: Monitor for any significant shifts in RF internal air defense deployments, particularly around other critical energy infrastructure (e.g., other nuclear power plants, major oil refineries, gas processing plants, major ports) as a result of the recent UAF attacks. (DECISION POINT: UAF intelligence to identify and track any new RF air defense deployments, security protocols, or vulnerabilities for future targeting.)

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

6.1. Intelligence Gaps

• Full Extent of Damage and Operational Impact from Overnight RF Strikes: Detailed, independent verification (IMINT, HUMINT) of the actual damage, casualties, and long-term operational impact of the Iskander-M and 24 unintercepted Shahed UAVs.
• RF Air Defense Deployment and Effectiveness (Deep Rear Areas): Identification of specific RF air defense units, platforms, and their current deployment and effectiveness in protecting critical energy and logistical infrastructure in deep rear areas (Kursk, Leningrad, Samara Oblasts). Understanding why such a large number of UAVs are reportedly intercepted, yet high-value targets are still impacted.
• Specifics of US Restrictions on Long-Range Weapons: Detailed understanding of the exact scope, duration, and rationale behind the alleged Pentagon blockage on UAF use of long-range Western weapons against RF territory.
• UAF Deep Strike Assets and Modus Operandi: Specific details on the types of UAVs/munitions used in the Kursk NPP, Ust-Luga, and Syzran attacks, and their launch locations/methods to better understand UAF capabilities, target selection criteria, and vulnerabilities to RF countermeasures.
• Intent of RF 35th Army in Zaporizhzhia: Clarification of the specific objectives and scale of operations by RF's 35th Army in Zaporizhzhia based on the video message.
• Impact of Bornholm Power Outage: Clarification of the cause and full impact of the power outage on Bornholm, and any potential security implications for NATO.
• Technical Details of Improvised MLRS: Further details on the type, capabilities, and deployment of the truck-mounted MLRS seen in "Дневник Десантника🇷🇺" video.
• Impact of 'Pole-21' Variant: Full technical capabilities, effective range, and specific vulnerabilities of the new 'Pole-21' EW variant detected on the Southern Axis.

6.2. Collection Requirements

• IMINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - RF Critical Energy Infrastructure and Internal Air Defense): Task IMINT and SIGINT assets to monitor Kursk NPP (Kurchatov), Ust-Luga port (Novatek terminal and Gazprom gas processing complex), Syzran oil refinery, and the surrounding regions for post-strike damage assessment, operational status, and any changes in security or logistical activity, including RF air defense movements and deployments. Focus on energy output and export data where available.
• IMINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - Ukrainian Impact Assessment): Task IMINT and SIGINT assets to assess damage from the overnight Iskander-M and Shahed attacks across Ukrainian territory. Identify targeted infrastructure and potential civilian casualties.
• OSINT/HUMINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - US Policy on Long-Range Strikes): Prioritize open-source intelligence and human intelligence efforts to confirm and detail the alleged Pentagon restrictions on UAF use of long-range Western weapons against RF. Seek official statements or leaks from relevant US and Ukrainian sources.
• OSINT/TECHINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - UAF Deep Strike Capabilities): Prioritize open-source intelligence and technical intelligence efforts to identify the types of UAF UAVs used in recent deep strikes, their performance characteristics, and potential areas of operation to anticipate future capabilities and target selection.
• IMINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - Kharkiv/Avdiivka Axes): Intensify ISR on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka axes to track RF unit movements, logistical lines, and any signs of additional force generation or regrouping for renewed assaults, especially in light of potential RF retaliation.
• OSINT/HUMINT (HIGH PRIORITY - International Reaction to Kursk NPP): Monitor international media, government statements, and diplomatic channels for reactions to the Kursk NPP attack, particularly from international nuclear regulatory bodies and key allies, to assess the diplomatic fallout.
• OSINT/TECHINT (HIGH PRIORITY - RF Propaganda): Monitor RF state media and pro-military channels for new narratives concerning UAF deep strikes, RF air defense, and any new claims of battlefield successes that require immediate counter-messaging, especially those related to "barbaric crimes."

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Enhance Ballistic Missile Defense and Layered Air Defense (CRITICAL - IMMEDIATE ACTION): Immediately review and implement urgent upgrades to ballistic missile defense capabilities to counter threats like the Iskander-M. Reinforce and layer air defense systems (both active and passive) around all critical infrastructure, major population centers, and strategic military assets, anticipating continued massed RF missile and UAV attacks. (Mitigates MDCOA 1 and protects national energy security and civilian population)
2. Advocate for Lifting Restrictions on Long-Range Western Weapons (CRITICAL - DIPLOMATIC ACTION): Urgently engage with US and other Western allies at the highest levels to advocate for the immediate lifting of restrictions on using long-range Western weapons against legitimate military targets within RF territory. Highlight the strategic imbalance created by such restrictions, especially in the context of RF's escalated deep strikes into Ukraine. (Enables symmetrical response and deters MDCOA 1)
3. Prepare for Widespread & Diverse RF Retaliatory Strikes (CRITICAL - IMMEDIATE ACTION): Anticipate and prepare for a potentially more severe and widespread wave of RF missile and UAV retaliatory strikes, incorporating a diverse mix of ballistic, cruise, and loitering munitions. Optimize air defense resource allocation based on anticipated threat trajectories and prioritize active and passive defenses for airfields, major logistical hubs, critical energy infrastructure, and government facilities. Implement robust damage control and recovery protocols. (Mitigates MDCOA 1)
4. Proactive & Aggressive Counter-Disinformation Campaign (CRITICAL): Immediately launch a robust and evidence-based counter-disinformation campaign. This must:
   • Highlight the impact of UAF deep strikes on legitimate military-economic targets within RF, directly refuting RF claims of successful interceptions and exposing their attempts to downplay damage.
   • Preemptively counter RF narratives framing UAF actions as "nuclear terrorism" or "barbaric crimes."
   • Publicize transparent updates on damage and casualties from RF's overnight Iskander-M and Shahed attacks.
   • Leverage Independence Day messaging to bolster national pride and highlight UAF capabilities and resilience.
   • Coordinate with international partners to disseminate accurate information and counter RF disinformation globally. (Counters MLCOA 2 and protects Ukraine's international image and domestic morale)
5. Prioritize Reinforcement of Kharkiv and Avdiivka Axes (CRITICAL): Despite deep strike successes and RF retaliation, the ground situation in Kharkiv and west of Avdiivka remains critical. Reallocate tactical and operational reserves, artillery assets, and air defense capabilities to these axes to prevent further RF breakthroughs and stabilize defensive lines, while balancing these needs with the increased air defense requirements for rear areas. (Mitigates MLCOA 4 and MDCOA 3)
6. Accelerate ERAM Missile Integration & Protection (CRITICAL): Prioritize resources for the rapid and secure integration of ERAM missiles into UAF air force assets. Develop comprehensive training and operational guidelines. Enhance air base defense measures to protect these high-value assets from potential RF retaliatory strikes. (Enhances UAF capabilities and protects new assets from MDCOA 1)
7. Strengthen EW Countermeasures and Replenishment (HIGH): Conduct an urgent assessment of UAF EW asset vulnerabilities to FPV drones, develop and implement rapid counter-FPV drone tactics and procedures for protecting EW systems, and prioritize the replenishment or repair of lost EW assets. Disseminate updated TTPs to all relevant units. (Mitigates ongoing EW threat and preserves critical capabilities)