Situation Report

SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 232300Z AUG 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• OVERALL OPERATIONAL PICTURE: Russian Federation (RF) forces continue multi-directional attack UAV operations, with new groups of UAVs detected over the Black Sea heading towards Odesa. Ballistic missile threats were also active in southern-eastern regions, though since cleared. RF continues its new Kharkiv axis offensive and intense attritional battles on the Eastern Front. UAF deep strike capabilities remain active, evidenced by ongoing disruptions within RF airspace and reported explosions in Belgorod Oblast and Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Air raid alerts for drones are currently active in Chernihiv and Sumy Oblasts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

  • Chernihiv Oblast: Threat of attack UAVs. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Sumy Oblast: Threat of attack UAVs. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Kharkiv Oblast (New Offensive Axis): RF forces are conducting a multi-pronged cross-border assault, capturing several border settlements including Strilecha, Pylna, and Borysivka. The primary vector appears to be towards Vovchansk. RF sources claim they are "driving a wedge" into UAF defenses near Glushchenkovo (likely a specific tactical objective within the broader Kharkiv offensive). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Avdiivka / Ocheretyne Axis: Intensified mechanized assaults by RF forces, supported by thermobaric systems (TOS-1A), west of Avdiivka, achieving further tactical gains near Ocheretyne. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Bakhmut / Chasiv Yar Axis: Heavy, attritional fighting continues in the Kanal district, but the Front Line of Troops (FLOT) has stabilized in the last 24 hours. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF sources claim UAF is committing police battalions to hold the line near Konstantinovka, implying significant losses for UAF. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - for claim, LOW CONFIDENCE - for actual unit identification/losses)
  • Southern / Zaporizhzhia Axis: Frontline near Robotyne remains relatively stable, but increased and more sophisticated Electronic Warfare (EW) activity, including a new 'Pole-21' variant, is noted. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • RF Internal Territory (Rostov Oblast): Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery reportedly on "day three" of a fire/explosion aftermath, with video evidence of significant smoke and flames, attributed to "unknown drones." This indicates sustained UAF deep strike capability impacting RF critical energy infrastructure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • RF Internal Territory (Bryansk Oblast): RF MoD claims 21 Ukrainian UAVs were intercepted and destroyed over Bryansk Oblast, reiterating earlier reports. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - for claim, LOW CONFIDENCE - for actual number/effectiveness)
  • Donetsk City (Temporarily Occupied): Video footage (UAF-aligned source) depicts residents collecting rainwater due to apparent water supply issues, potentially indicating infrastructure degradation or resource shortages. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

• STRATEGIC MISSILE/UAV ACTIVITY:

  • RF Activity: New drone trajectories indicated a shift towards Odesa, since cleared. Ballistic missile threat from the south-east was active, also since cleared. Current drone threats are focused on Chernihiv and Sumy Oblasts. Glide bombs (KAB/FAB) remain a high threat on all axes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • UAF Activity: Confirmed UAF deep operations continue to disrupt RF internal air traffic and strike targets within RF territory, specifically the Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery. RF claims of intercepting 21 UAVs over Bryansk suggest continued high volume of UAF drone operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Generally favorable weather conditions for UAV operations for both sides across most operational areas, as indicated by ongoing drone activity in Chernihiv and Sumy Oblasts. No significant meteorological factors are currently inhibiting operations. Localized heavy rain in Donetsk may impact ground operations or morale in that specific area. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The fire at Novoshakhtinsk Refinery will generate significant localized smoke and air pollution. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF:
  • Offensive Grouping "North": Newly designated force conducting the Kharkiv offensive, with significant logistical buildup confirmed in Belgorod Oblast. RF sources claim they are "driving a wedge" into UAF defenses near Glushchenkovo. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Eastern Front: Sustained high-intensity attacks west of Avdiivka by 30th Motor Rifle Brigade and 90th Tank Division, utilizing TOS-1A systems. Pressure from 98th VDV Division continues in Chasiv Yar. RF sources claim UAF police battalions are deployed near Konstantinovka. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - RF attacks, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - UAF police battalions)
  • Airspace Control: RF MoD claims high interception rates of UAF drones (21 over Bryansk). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Electronic Warfare (EW): Deployment of a new 'Pole-21' variant on the Zaporizhzhia front. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Information Operations (IO): RF state media (TASS) continues to report on internal legal actions, international diplomatic discussions (India), and military claims (UAV interceptions), and now on US military aid to Ukraine (ERAM missiles). TASS is also amplifying RF tactical claims near Glushchenkovo. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF:
  • Air Defense & Surveillance: UAF Air Force maintains active surveillance, providing timely warnings and updates on RF drone movements, including new groups towards Chernihiv and Sumy. Recent reports indicate successful engagements, leading to the "all clear" for previous air threats (Odesa, ballistic). (HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF forces are heavily engaged defending against the new Kharkiv offensive and sustained attacks on the Eastern Front, including counter-assaults by the 79th Brigade. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Deep Strike & Offensive Maneuver: UAF demonstrates continued ability to conduct targeted drone strikes into RF territory, exemplified by the sustained fire at Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Information Operations: UAF-aligned channels effectively disseminate information about RF internal issues (Donetsk water shortages, Novoshakhtinsk refinery strike) and national messaging. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Western Support (New Information): TASS reports that Kyiv will receive over 3,000 ERAM air-to-air missiles within six weeks from the US. This suggests a bolster to UAF air defense/air superiority capabilities, though the exact type "ERAM" needs verification. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - for report, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - for specific missile type/delivery)
  • Western Support Limitations (Confirmed): The Wall Street Journal reports that the US has not given Kyiv permission to use ATACMS missiles deep into RF territory since late spring. This significantly constrains UAF deep strike options. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.4. Relevant Dempster-Shafer Beliefs (Updated)

• "Industrial Sector: Industrial Accident in [Location]" (0.412927): Strongly supported by video evidence of significant fire and smoke at the Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery, described as the "third day" after "unknown drone arrivals." (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Military Action: Drone Strike by [Side] on [Target Type] in [Region]" (0.193300): Directly supported by the Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery incident attributed to "unknown drones." This is a UAF deep strike. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Energy Sector: Energy Infrastructure Attack in [Location]" (0.074943): Directly supported by the Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery incident. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Troop Movement: Advance by Russian Federation in Kharkiv Region" (0.071364): Supported by previous reports of the Kharkiv offensive and Marochko's claim of RF "driving a wedge" near Glushchenkovo. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Troop Movement: Deployment of Ground Forces by Russian Federation to Glushchenkov" (0.032958): Supported by Marochko's specific claim. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Technology Deployment: Introduction of ERAM missiles by United States to Ukraine" (0.031866): Supported by TASS report citing WSJ. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - for report, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - for specific missile type/delivery)
• "Environmental Impact: Environmental Disaster in [Region]" (0.025458): Supported by the significant fire at Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery, which will have environmental consequences. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities:
  • Multi-Front Offensive: RF capability to open new offensive axes (Kharkiv) while sustaining high-intensity operations on existing fronts (Avdiivka, Chasiv Yar) remains demonstrated. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Adaptive UAV/Ballistic Operations: RF demonstrates capability to dynamically re-task and re-route drone groups mid-flight (e.g., Odesa shift) and to employ ballistic missiles. Current threats in Chernihiv and Sumy show persistent tactical drone use. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Thermobaric Systems: Continued effective use of TOS-1A systems for localized breakthroughs. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Advanced EW: Deployment of new 'Pole-21' variant. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Glide Bomb Dominance: Sustained use of FAB/KAB glide bombs remains a critical capability. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Intentions:
  • Force UAF Reserve Commitment & Buffer Zone: The Kharkiv offensive is a clear attempt to stretch UAF defenses, force commitment of strategic reserves, and create a "buffer zone." The claim of "driving a wedge" near Glushchenkovo aligns with a tactical intent to achieve localized breakthroughs. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Degrade Ukrainian Infrastructure/Military Capability: The persistent drone threats, even if shifting areas (Chernihiv, Sumy), suggest an intention to target energy, infrastructure, or military assets. The previous shift towards Odesa indicates a high-level intent against critical port infrastructure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Achieve Breakthroughs on Eastern Front: Continue attritional pressure and localized breakthroughs, particularly west of Avdiivka, to expand salients and threaten key UAF logistics. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Counter UAF Drone Superiority: Deploy sophisticated EW systems to counter UAF's tactical drone advantage. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Sow Discord/Undermine International Support: RF state media continues to amplify narratives designed to divide Ukraine from its Western allies (Dutch rhetoric, US ATACMS restrictions) and undermine international aid (TASS report on ERAM missiles is likely an attempt to downplay their impact or highlight Western involvement). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Courses of Action:
  • MLCOA: Prioritize and expand the Kharkiv offensive, focusing on tactical wedges and Vovchansk. RF will likely attempt to seize Vovchansk and establish a deeper zone of control, using claims like "driving a wedge" near Glushchenkovo to describe localized tactical successes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA: Sustain high-intensity mechanized assaults west of Avdiivka. RF will continue to use combined arms, including thermobaric systems. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA: Resume adaptive drone and missile strikes on Ukrainian infrastructure, including shifting targets. Despite recent air threat clearance in Odesa, RF will likely continue to direct drone waves towards energy, military, and critical infrastructure in various regions, adapting to UAF air defenses. Current threats in Chernihiv and Sumy exemplify this. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA: Intensify internal information control and counter-mobilization narratives. RF will continue to use legal and media mechanisms to manage public opinion and punish perceived detractors, while also trying to undermine Ukrainian mobilization efforts and international support. Amplification of the ERAM missile delivery and the ATACMS restrictions are part of this. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• New Drone Target Prioritization: Observed shift of drone groups over the Black Sea towards Odesa (since cleared), and current active threats in Chernihiv and Sumy. This indicates a dynamic and flexible targeting strategy for RF's UAV campaign. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Tactical Focus within Kharkiv Offensive: Specific focus on "driving a wedge" near Glushchenkovo indicates a precise tactical objective for localized breakthroughs within the broader Kharkiv offensive. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Information Warfare Focus: TASS report on ERAM missiles is a new element, likely an attempt to frame US aid to Ukraine in a way that suits RF's narrative, perhaps to suggest escalation or to downplay the impact of such aid. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Amplifying the political cartoon about Trump and the EU is another attempt to highlight divisions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• Logistical Buildup: Confirmed significant logistical buildup in Belgorod Oblast directly supports the new Kharkiv offensive. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Drone Supply: The ability to launch multi-vector drone attacks, alongside RF claims of numerous interceptions (21 over Bryansk), suggests RF maintains a substantial supply of UAVs for sustained operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Internal Infrastructure Degradation (Localized/Impacted): Video from Donetsk suggesting water shortages may indicate localized infrastructure problems in temporarily occupied areas. The sustained fire at Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery impacts RF energy supply chains and refining capacity, leading to potential economic and logistical strain. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Public Health Concerns: Reports of cholera cases in RF, while currently low in number, highlight potential public health vulnerabilities that could strain resources or public trust if they escalate. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• Adaptive Drone/Missile C2: The observed re-routing of drone groups and recent ballistic missile threat indicated a functional and somewhat agile C2 system for UAV and missile operations, allowing for dynamic target selection or response to UAF air defense. UAF's ability to clear some of these threats suggests that RF C2 for these specific operations is not entirely impervious to UAF counter-action. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Multi-Front Coordination: RF's ability to open a new front in Kharkiv while maintaining pressure on existing fronts suggests a degree of effective operational-level C2 for force allocation and synchronization. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• EW C2 Integration: The deployment of new EW systems implies a level of C2 integration to counter UAF drone operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Air Defense Responsiveness: UAF Air Force demonstrates high readiness and effective early warning, providing timely updates on RF drone and ballistic missile threats. Recent "all clear" messages indicate successful defense against previous air threats. Current alerts in Chernihiv and Sumy show ongoing vigilance. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) However, the sheer volume and adaptive nature of RF attacks pose a continuous strain. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Multi-Front Defense: UAF forces are heavily engaged defending against simultaneous major offensives in Kharkiv, west of Avdiivka, and sustained pressure in Chasiv Yar. This indicates significant strain on available manpower and resources. UAF's 79th Brigade demonstrates offensive capabilities and readiness in local counter-assaults. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF claims of UAF deploying police battalions near Konstantinovka, if true, would suggest a severe strain on regular military units and an ad-hoc defensive posture. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Capability: UAF continues to demonstrate capability for deep strikes into RF territory using UAVs, causing disruptions (e.g., Russian airport disruptions, Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery fire). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Counter-EW Adaptation: UAF units on the Southern Axis are actively assessing and adapting to the new 'Pole-21' EW variant. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Future Air Capability: The reported upcoming delivery of over 3,000 ERAM missiles from the US within six weeks, if accurate, will significantly enhance UAF's air-to-air combat capabilities and potentially air defense effectiveness, boosting readiness. (HIGH CONFIDENCE for report, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE for specific missile type/delivery timeframe)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • Successful Air Defense Engagements: UAF successfully mitigated recent RF drone and ballistic missile threats (Odesa, south-east), leading to "all clear" messages. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Stabilized Chasiv Yar FLOT: Despite intense pressure, UAF has held the line in the Kanal district for the past 24 hours. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Effective Deep Strikes: Continued reports of UAF drone activity over RF territory (Bryansk Oblast) and disruptions at Russian airports demonstrate sustained deep strike capabilities. The prolonged fire at Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery is a significant operational success for UAF, impacting RF energy infrastructure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Tactical Capture: The 79th Brigade's capture of a RF soldier near Malinovka provides tactical intelligence and a morale boost. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Information Operations Impact: UAF-aligned channels effectively highlighting RF internal issues (Donetsk water shortages) and the impact of UAF deep strikes (Novoshakhtinsk refinery) can impact RF morale and support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Incoming Air Support: The reported delivery of 3,000+ ERAM missiles is a significant positive development for future air superiority and defense. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - for report, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - for specific missile type/delivery)
• Setbacks:
  • New Kharkiv Offensive: The most significant setback, as RF forces have opened a new axis and seized several border settlements, creating a new operational challenge. RF claims of "driving a wedge" near Glushchenkovo highlight ongoing tactical pressure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Tactical Gains West of Avdiivka: RF forces have made further tactical gains near Ocheretyne, exacerbated by the use of TOS-1A systems. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • New Drone Threats (Chernihiv/Sumy): The shift of RF drone threats to Chernihiv and Sumy Oblasts represents continued and evolving pressure on UAF air defenses in new regions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • New EW Threat: The 'Pole-21' variant on the Southern Axis poses a significant new challenge to UAF drone operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • ATACMS Restriction: US prohibition on using ATACMS for deep strikes into RF territory limits UAF's long-range precision strike capabilities. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Manpower & Reserves: The opening of the Kharkiv front and sustained high-intensity operations on the Eastern Front place immense strain on UAF manpower and strategic reserves, necessitating rapid deployment of tactical reserves. RF claims regarding police battalions highlight potential constraints. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Air Defense Capacity & Munitions: The adaptive nature of RF drone attacks, the pervasive glide bomb threat, and the new ballistic missile threat reinforce the urgent and continuous need for robust, multi-layered air defense systems and interceptor munitions, especially for protecting critical urban and industrial centers and frontline units. While ERAM missiles are incoming, they are air-to-air; ground-based air defense munitions remain critical. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Counter-EW Capabilities: Urgent requirement for advanced counter-EW measures and training to mitigate the effects of systems like the new 'Pole-21' variant, safeguarding UAF drone ISR and C2. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Precision Long-Range Strike Ammunition: Continued need for precision long-range strike capabilities to target RF logistical hubs and high-value assets. The reported ATACMS restriction is a significant constraint. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• ISR for Drone/Missile Threat: Enhanced ISR capabilities are required to quickly identify new RF drone launch sites, ballistic missile launch preparations, C2 nodes for re-tasking, and primary/secondary target sets for these dynamically routed threats. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Propaganda:
  • Discrediting UAF Commitment: Военкор Котенок's claim of UAF deploying police battalions near Konstantinovka aims to portray UAF as desperate, suffering heavy losses, and using inadequately trained forces. This is a common tactic to demoralize opponents. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Internal Unity/External Blame: TASS report on India-Russia oil trade reinforces a narrative of continued international economic relations despite Western pressure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) TASS reporting on potential UK economic issues and Dutch political rhetoric regarding Ukrainian men further supports an RF narrative of Western decline and internal divisions within allied nations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Amplifying Western Restrictions: Russian sources are actively amplifying the Wall Street Journal report about US restrictions on ATACMS use, aiming to highlight UAF's limitations, sow distrust between Ukraine and its allies, and potentially boost RF morale. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Celebrating Military Effectiveness: Colonelcassad's video showing "Anvar Detachment" strikes on UAF positions aims to demonstrate RF military capability and success. TASS also amplifies Marochko's claim of "driving a wedge" near Glushchenkovo, depicting localized RF tactical success. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Counter-Messaging on Aid: TASS reporting on the impending delivery of ERAM missiles may be an attempt to pre-emptively manage the narrative around Western military aid, perhaps to downplay its significance or to frame it as further Western intervention. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Western Political Disarray: Colonelcassad's photo message featuring a political cartoon about Trump and the EU aims to highlight perceived disunity and internal problems within the Western alliance, seeking to undermine confidence in international support for Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Counter-Propaganda/Messaging:
  • Highlighting RF Failures/Hardship: Шеф Hayabusa🫡🇺🇦's video of rainwater collection in Donetsk highlights infrastructure and humanitarian challenges in occupied territories. The video and caption regarding the Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery fire actively showcase UAF deep strike effectiveness and its impact on RF infrastructure, aiming to undermine RF's warfighting capacity and morale. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Transparency on Threats & Successes: UAF Air Force's timely warnings and subsequent "all clear" messages about drone and ballistic missile threats maintain public trust and provide essential information, while showcasing successful air defense. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Showcasing Operational Successes: Оперативний ЗСУ's video of a captured RF soldier highlights UAF operational effectiveness and provides a tangible success story. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukrainian Public: The ongoing threats from drones (even when cleared, and now active in Chernihiv/Sumy) and ballistic missiles will undoubtedly increase anxiety. The new offensive in Kharkiv will continue to cause significant concern. Transparency from UAF Air Force helps manage this, and successful air defense engagements likely provide a temporary morale boost. The capture of an RF soldier and the visible impact on RF's Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery are positive for morale. The reported ERAM missile delivery, if widely known, could also boost confidence in Western support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Public: Reports of UAV interceptions over Bryansk Oblast and disruptions at Russian airports will reinforce the perception of ongoing threats within RF territory. The sustained fire at Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery, a key energy facility, will likely generate significant public concern regarding internal security and the economic impact of the war, potentially affecting morale. The amplification of US ATACMS restrictions might boost morale for those supporting the war, but the actual impact of UAF drone strikes on internal RF security remains a source of public anxiety. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Images of hardship in occupied Donetsk (water shortages) could contribute to a negative perception of RF's ability to govern occupied territories. Public health concerns (cholera) could also generate unease. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• US Military Aid (ERAM Missiles): The reported upcoming delivery of over 3,000 ERAM missiles from the US within six weeks is a significant development, indicating continued robust US military support for Ukraine's air defense/air superiority capabilities. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - for report, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - for specific missile type/delivery details).
• US Restrictions (ATACMS): The repeated emphasis by Russian sources on the Wall Street Journal report concerning US restrictions on ATACMS use deep into RF territory is a critical point. It highlights a continuing point of contention or strategic disagreement between Ukraine and its key ally, potentially affecting UAF's operational planning and effectiveness. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Netherlands Political Shift: TASS reporting on the Dutch Party of Freedom's proposal for deporting Ukrainian men, if gaining traction, represents a potential erosion of political support for Ukraine in a key European nation. This could create diplomatic challenges and be exploited by RF. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• UK Economic Concerns: TASS reporting on potential UK economic issues and an IMF loan, while an RF narrative, aims to portray Western nations as facing internal struggles that could detract from their ability to support Ukraine. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• Indian Neutrality/Economic Pragmatism: TASS report on India's oil purchasing policy indicates India's continued focus on economic interests, maintaining a degree of distance from Western sanctions regimes against RF. This suggests that some international actors continue to engage with RF, undermining the effectiveness of broad isolation efforts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Western Unity (Perceived/Real): Colonelcassad's political cartoon about Trump and the EU reflects RF's attempt to sow discord and highlight perceived disunity within Western alliances. This narrative aims to weaken international resolve for supporting Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

• MLCOA 1: Prioritized Offensive in Kharkiv Oblast to Seize Vovchansk and Expand Buffer Zone with Tactical Wedges. RF will commit additional forces and resources to consolidate gains, establish control over Vovchansk, and expand their zone of influence in northern Kharkiv, aiming to fix UAF reserves and create a deeper "buffer" against cross-border attacks. Specific tactical pushes, like the "wedge" near Glushchenkovo, will continue. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Confirmed opening of a new axis with significant logistical buildup, stated RF objectives of creating a buffer, and current tactical claims from RF sources.
• MLCOA 2: Sustained and Intensified Mechanized Assaults West of Avdiivka, Supported by Thermobaric Systems. RF will continue to leverage armored and mechanized units, supported by heavy artillery and TOS-1A systems, to expand the Ocheretyne salient and threaten key UAF logistical lines towards Pokrovsk. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Consistent RF strategy, recent tactical gains, and observed increase in TOS-1A usage.
• MLCOA 3: Renewed Adaptive and Concentrated Drone/Missile Campaign against Critical Infrastructure, Shifting Targets as Necessary. Despite recent air defense successes, RF will likely continue to direct drone waves and potentially ballistic missiles towards energy, port, and military-industrial facilities, adapting targeting based on real-time intelligence and UAF air defense responses. Current threats in Chernihiv and Sumy signal this adaptive targeting. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Observed dynamic shifts in drone targeting (Odesa, then Chernihiv/Sumy), and persistent RF intent to degrade Ukrainian infrastructure.
• MLCOA 4: Increased EW Activity and Glide Bomb Usage Across Frontlines. RF will intensify the use of EW systems, particularly the new 'Pole-21' variant, to disrupt UAF drone operations. Concurrently, glide bomb attacks will remain a primary tactic to support ground assaults and suppress UAF defenses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: New EW deployment and consistent reliance on glide bombs.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

• MDCOA 1: Rapid Operational Breakthrough in Kharkiv Oblast, Threatening Kharkiv City. Should UAF fail to rapidly reinforce and stabilize the new Kharkiv front, RF forces could achieve a rapid operational breakthrough, pushing deeper towards key population centers or threatening the city of Kharkiv itself, potentially overwhelming local defenses. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: The new offensive axis is designed to create this threat. A collapse of defenses could lead to a significant territorial loss and humanitarian crisis, forcing a strategic withdrawal or costly counter-offensive.
• MDCOA 2: Coordinated Air/Missile/Drone Campaign to Sever a Major Ukrainian Logistics Hub in Western Ukraine, or a Major Southern Port. RF could execute a highly coordinated, multi-domain attack (massed missiles, glide bombs, multiple waves of UAVs) against a critical logistics hub (e.g., major rail junction in central/western Ukraine, or a critical port in the south like Odesa), aiming to severely disrupt UAF supply lines to the front and international trade. This would be exacerbated by the ATACMS restrictions and UAF's primary reliance on ground-based air defenses. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: This is within RF capabilities and, if successful, could have significant operational consequences for UAF's ability to sustain forces and export goods, particularly if UAF long-range counter-strike options are limited.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Next 24-48 Hours:
  • Kharkiv Offensive: High likelihood of continued intense fighting and RF attempts to expand control in Kharkiv Oblast, particularly towards Vovchansk and specific tactical objectives like Glushchenkovo. UAF counter-assaults will be critical. (DECISION POINT: Immediate allocation of tactical reserves and fire support to stabilize the Vovchansk axis and establish new defensive lines. Consider pre-emptive counter-fire against detected RF logistical hubs in Belgorod Oblast if targets are within approved strike parameters.)
  • Eastern Front (Avdiivka/Chasiv Yar): Continued high-intensity assaults west of Avdiivka, with a focus on widening the salient. Chasiv Yar likely to see renewed concentrated assaults. (DECISION POINT: Prioritization of resupply, counter-battery fire, and reinforcement for frontline units in these sectors, particularly targeting TOS-1A systems and identified RF police battalion deployment if confirmed.)
  • RF Drone Threat (Chernihiv/Sumy/Other Regions): Expect continued adaptive RF drone attacks, with current focus on Chernihiv and Sumy, but potential shifts to other regions depending on UAF air defense responses. (DECISION POINT: Dynamic allocation of air defense assets based on evolving threat vectors and intelligence on RF drone staging areas. Reinforce air defenses in threatened regions.)
  • UAF Deep Operations: UAF deep strike operations into RF territory are likely to continue, causing further disruptions (e.g., Novoshakhtinsk refinery, airport closures). (DECISION POINT: Assessment of target effectiveness for deep strikes, ensuring maximum impact on RF logistics/morale with minimal risk to UAF assets, considering ATACMS restrictions.)
• Next 72 Hours:
  • RF Offensive Momentum: RF will seek to maintain the initiative on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka axes. If UAF stabilization efforts are insufficient, further RF gains are probable. (DECISION POINT: Strategic review of force allocation across all fronts to prevent critical overstretch, potentially requiring difficult choices regarding defensive priorities.)
  • RF Drone/Missile Campaign Refinement: RF may further refine drone and missile tactics, including saturation attacks or complex flight paths, in response to UAF air defense effectiveness. (DECISION POINT: Review and adaptation of UAF air defense TTPs, and intelligence focus on RF drone/missile command-and-control capabilities and potential new launch sites.)
  • EW Countermeasures: UAF will need to quickly implement and test new counter-EW TTPs against the 'Pole-21' variant. (DECISION POINT: Rapid dissemination of counter-EW protocols and technical solutions to affected frontline units.)
  • Incoming ERAM Missiles: Initial preparations for the integration and deployment of the reported ERAM missiles will begin. (DECISION POINT: Detailed planning for training, logistical support, and operational integration of new air-to-air missile systems upon delivery.)

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

6.1. Intelligence Gaps

• RF "North" Group of Forces ORBAT and End-State Objectives: Full order of battle, specific unit compositions, and ultimate strategic objectives for the new Kharkiv offensive. This includes understanding the depth of their intended advance and the specific objectives beyond Vovchansk/Glushchenkovo.
• RF Second Echelon Forces (Kharkiv/Avdiivka): Strength, disposition, and readiness of RF second-echelon forces positioned to exploit gains or reinforce the Kharkiv and Ocheretyne salients.
• RF Drone/Ballistic Missile Targeting Prioritization: Precise identification of RF's primary target sets for their adaptive drone/missile campaign in various regions (e.g., energy, military, transport infrastructure in Chernihiv, Sumy, Odesa, etc.).
• 'Pole-21' EW Variant Capabilities and Vulnerabilities: Detailed technical capabilities, effective range, operating frequencies, and potential vulnerabilities of the new 'Pole-21' EW system.
• UAF Police Battalion Deployment (Konstantinovka): Confirmation of RF claims regarding the deployment of UAF police battalions near Konstantinovka, including their actual role, strength, and equipment, and true casualty figures.
• Incoming ERAM Missiles (Specifics): Confirmation of the specific "ERAM" missile type (e.g., AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile), exact quantity, delivery timeline, and associated platforms/training requirements.
• Impact of Novoshakhtinsk Refinery Strike: Detailed assessment of the operational and economic impact of the sustained fire at Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery on RF fuel supplies and refining capacity.
• RF Internal Public Health Impact: Assessment of the actual scale and impact of cholera cases or other health issues on RF military and civilian populations, and potential resource diversion.
• Impact of Dutch Political Rhetoric: Assessment of the likelihood and potential impact of the Dutch Party of Freedom's proposal regarding Ukrainian men on international support and Ukrainian diaspora.

6.2. Collection Requirements

• IMINT/ELINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - Kharkiv Axis): Immediately task all available ISR assets to the Belgorod-Kharkiv border area and the Vovchansk-Glushchenkovo axes to identify follow-on forces, command posts, logistical nodes (fuel, ammo depots), and new defensive lines supporting the "North" Group of Forces. Focus on identifying potential staging areas for further advances. Priority on identifying assets engaging UAF 79th Brigade.
• IMINT/ELINT/SIGINT (HIGH PRIORITY - Eastern Front): Intensify collection on RF C2 nodes, artillery positions (especially TOS-1A launchers), and logistics hubs supporting the Avdiivka/Ocheretyne axis and Chasiv Yar. Monitor for indications of RF regrouping or preparation for renewed assaults, and verify claims of UAF police battalion deployments.
• ELINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - EW Threat): Dedicated collection to characterize the new 'Pole-21' EW variant, including its operating frequencies, jamming techniques, and impact on UAF drone C2/data links. Rapid technical exploitation is critical.
• IMINT/ELINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - Drone/Ballistic Missile Campaign): Intensify collection on drone launch sites in RF territory and RF-occupied Ukraine (especially in the Black Sea region and western RF border areas) to understand new deployment patterns and target preferences. Monitor RF air defense radar and communication frequencies for indications of C2 adaptations and vulnerabilities. Prioritize monitoring for ballistic missile launch preparations from the south-east.
• OSINT/Media Monitoring (HIGH PRIORITY): Monitor RF and Ukrainian social media, local news, and official statements for information related to drone/missile damage assessments, civilian impact in targeted areas (Chernihiv, Sumy, Odesa), and further details on internal RF issues (e.g., Donetsk water shortages, Novoshakhtinsk refinery impact, cholera outbreaks). Focus on RF narratives concerning UAF police battalion deployments, the impact of ATACMS restrictions, and the amplification of Western political rhetoric. Gather more details on the captured RF soldier. Verify specifics of the reported ERAM missile delivery.
• HUMINT (ONGOING): Seek information from sources regarding RF drone/missile operator training, C2 protocols for dynamic re-routing, internal assessments of UAF air defense effectiveness, and any intelligence on RF plans for the Kharkiv axis and southern offensives. Exploit the captured RF soldier for tactical and operational intelligence.
• IMINT/SARINT (Targeted): Prioritize overhead imagery of critical infrastructure in Chernihiv, Sumy, Odesa, and other potential southern targets, and RF logistical hubs within strike range, for pre- and post-strike damage assessment. Conduct detailed damage assessment of Novoshakhtinsk Oil Refinery.

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Reinforce Kharkiv Axis Immediately (CRITICAL): Rapidly deploy strategic and tactical reserves to reinforce the Vovchansk-Glushchenkovo axis and establish robust new defensive lines to slow the enemy advance, prevent a rapid operational breakthrough, and stabilize the new front. Prioritize anti-armor and counter-battery assets. Support UAF 79th Brigade's successful local counter-assaults.
2. Maintain High Alert and Enhance Air Defense for All Vulnerable Regions (CRITICAL): Anticipate continued RF drone and potentially ballistic missile threats, with dynamic target shifting. Prioritize deployment of additional mobile air defense systems and C-UAS capabilities to Chernihiv, Sumy, and Odesa. Implement dynamic, multi-layered air defense strategies to counter shifting RF drone trajectories and ballistic missile threats. Integrate real-time intelligence on drone/missile paths into air defense command systems.
3. Prioritize Deep Strike Targeting and Damage Exploitation (HIGH): Prioritize long-range precision fires (within current capabilities and restrictions) against identified RF logistical buildup in Belgorod Oblast (supporting Kharkiv offensive), TOS-1A systems near Ocheretyne, and critical RF drone launch/C2 sites. Exploit any detected vulnerabilities in RF logistics or C2. Maintain pressure on Russian internal targets (e.g., Novoshakhtinsk refinery, airports) to disrupt C2 and logistics. Publicize damage and operational impact of these strikes.
4. Develop and Disseminate Counter-EW Measures (HIGH): Rapidly analyze intelligence on the new 'Pole-21' variant. Develop and immediately disseminate updated TTPs, frequency hopping protocols, and hardware/software adaptations for UAF drone and EW units on the Southern Axis to mitigate its effects.
5. Counter RF Information Operations (HIGH): Actively counter RF narratives (e.g., regarding UAF police battalions, Dutch political rhetoric, ERAM missile impact) with factual reporting and evidence. Amplify information regarding RF internal hardships (e.g., Donetsk water shortages, Novoshakhtinsk fire) and the impact of UAF deep strikes through targeted information operations to exacerbate internal friction and undermine public trust. Leverage the captured RF soldier for counter-propaganda.
6. International Diplomatic Engagement (ONGOING): Continue to leverage evidence of both RF aggression (new Kharkiv offensive, civilian infrastructure targeting, ballistic missile threats) and UAF operational successes (Novoshakhtinsk strike) in diplomatic efforts to secure additional air defense systems, counter-EW technologies, and critically, long-range precision strike capabilities without restrictions. Emphasize the urgent need for support to counter multi-front offensives and potential erosion of international support.
7. Exploit Tactical Intelligence (HIGH): Rapidly debrief the captured RF soldier from the 57th Brigade for immediate tactical intelligence on enemy unit dispositions, morale, equipment, and intentions, particularly concerning the Malinovka sector, Glushchenkovo area, and broader Kharkiv offensive.