Situation Report

SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 232200Z AUG 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• OVERALL OPERATIONAL PICTURE: Russian Federation (RF) forces continue multi-directional attack UAV operations, with a new group of UAVs detected over the Black Sea heading towards Odesa. Ballistic missile threats are also active in southern-eastern regions. RF continues its new Kharkiv axis offensive and intense attritional battles on the Eastern Front. UAF deep strike capabilities remain active, evidenced by ongoing disruptions within RF airspace and reported explosions in Belgorod Oblast. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

  • Odesa Oblast: New groups of RF attack UAVs detected over the Black Sea, heading towards Odesa. This indicates a renewed or concentrated threat to the critical port city. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Southern-Eastern Regions (General): Threat of ballistic missile employment from the south-east in areas under air raid alert. This is a dynamic and immediate threat. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Kharkiv Oblast (New Offensive Axis): RF forces are conducting a multi-pronged cross-border assault, capturing several border settlements including Strilecha, Pylna, and Borysivka. The primary vector appears to be towards Vovchansk. This remains a significant new front. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Avdiivka / Ocheretyne Axis: Intensified mechanized assaults by RF forces, supported by thermobaric systems (TOS-1A), west of Avdiivka, achieving further tactical gains near Ocheretyne. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Bakhmut / Chasiv Yar Axis: Heavy, attritional fighting continues in the Kanal district, but the Front Line of Troops (FLOT) has stabilized in the last 24 hours. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) RF sources claim UAF is committing police battalions to hold the line near Konstantinovka, implying significant losses for UAF. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - for claim, LOW CONFIDENCE - for actual unit identification/losses)
  • Southern / Zaporizhzhia Axis: Frontline near Robotyne remains relatively stable, but increased and more sophisticated Electronic Warfare (EW) activity, including a new 'Pole-21' variant, is noted. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • RF Internal Territory (Bryansk Oblast): RF MoD claims 21 Ukrainian UAVs were intercepted and destroyed over Bryansk Oblast, reiterating earlier reports. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - for claim, LOW CONFIDENCE - for actual number/effectiveness)
  • Donetsk City (Temporarily Occupied): Video footage (UAF-aligned source) depicts residents collecting rainwater due to apparent water supply issues, potentially indicating infrastructure degradation or resource shortages. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • General RF Internal Territory: Ribar's photo message ("Ну что, все побежали, и мы тоже") suggests a general awareness or acknowledgment of the ongoing conflict or perhaps a reference to new deployments/mobilization. Without context, its direct military relevance is low. (LOW CONFIDENCE)

• STRATEGIC MISSILE/UAV ACTIVITY:

  • RF Activity: New drone trajectories indicate a shift towards Odesa. Ballistic missile threat from the south-east is currently active. Glide bombs (KAB/FAB) remain a high threat on all axes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • UAF Activity: Confirmed UAF deep operations continue to disrupt RF internal air traffic and strike targets within RF territory. RF claims of intercepting 21 UAVs over Bryansk suggest continued high volume of UAF drone operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Generally favorable weather conditions for UAV operations for both sides across most operational areas, as indicated by ongoing drone activity. No significant meteorological factors are currently inhibiting operations. Localized heavy rain in Donetsk may impact ground operations or morale in that specific area. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF:
  • Offensive Grouping "North": Newly designated force conducting the Kharkiv offensive, with significant logistical buildup confirmed in Belgorod Oblast. Its full Order of Battle (ORBAT) and ultimate objectives are still being assessed. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Eastern Front: Sustained high-intensity attacks west of Avdiivka by 30th Motor Rifle Brigade and 90th Tank Division, utilizing TOS-1A systems. Pressure from 98th VDV Division continues in Chasiv Yar. RF sources claim UAF police battalions are deployed near Konstantinovka. (HIGH CONFIDENCE - RF attacks, MEDIUM CONFIDENCE - UAF police battalions)
  • Airspace Control: RF MoD claims high interception rates of UAF drones (21 over Bryansk). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Electronic Warfare (EW): Deployment of a new 'Pole-21' variant on the Zaporizhzhia front. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Information Operations (IO): RF state media (TASS) continues to report on internal legal actions, international diplomatic discussions (India), and military claims (UAV interceptions). (HIGH CONFIDENCE) "Akhmat" special forces continue to push morale-boosting content. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF:
  • Air Defense & Surveillance: UAF Air Force maintains active surveillance, providing timely warnings and updates on RF drone movements, including new groups towards Odesa, and ballistic missile threats. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF forces are heavily engaged defending against the new Kharkiv offensive and sustained attacks on the Eastern Front. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Deep Strike & Offensive Maneuver: UAF demonstrates continued ability to conduct targeted drone strikes into RF territory. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Information Operations: UAF-aligned channels effectively disseminate information about RF internal issues (Donetsk water shortages) and national messaging. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Western Support Limitations: The Wall Street Journal reports that the US has not given Kyiv permission to use ATACMS missiles deep into RF territory since late spring. This significantly constrains UAF deep strike options. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.4. Relevant Dempster-Shafer Beliefs (Updated)

• "Military Action: Drone Strike by [Unknown Side] on [Air Defense Systems] in [Bryansk Oblast]" (0.012270): RF reports 21 UAVs shot down over Bryansk Oblast, supporting drone activity. Specific target type is unknown, but AD systems would be priority for UAF. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• "Military Action: Drone Strike by [Unknown Side] on [Infrastructure] in [Bryansk Oblast]" (0.002177): As above, with infrastructure being a common UAF drone target. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• "Military Action: Missile Strike by [Side] on [Target Type] in [Region]" (0.029244): Supported by UAF Air Force warning of ballistic missile threat from the south-east. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• "Logistical Shift: Food and Water Shortage for [Side]" (0.026688): UAF-aligned video showing rainwater collection in Donetsk directly supports localized water shortages. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities:
  • Multi-Front Offensive: RF capability to open new offensive axes (Kharkiv) while sustaining high-intensity operations on existing fronts (Avdiivka, Chasiv Yar) remains demonstrated. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Adaptive UAV/Ballistic Operations: RF demonstrates capability to dynamically re-task and re-route drone groups mid-flight (as previously observed), and to employ ballistic missiles as a high-speed, long-range threat. New drone groups towards Odesa show adaptable targeting. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Thermobaric Systems: Continued effective use of TOS-1A systems for localized breakthroughs. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Advanced EW: Deployment of new 'Pole-21' variant. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Glide Bomb Dominance: Sustained use of FAB/KAB glide bombs remains a critical capability. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Intentions:
  • Force UAF Reserve Commitment & Buffer Zone: The Kharkiv offensive is a clear attempt to stretch UAF defenses, force commitment of strategic reserves, and create a "buffer zone." (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Degrade Ukrainian Infrastructure/Military Capability: The shift of drone targets towards Odesa, coupled with ballistic missile threats, suggests an intention to target critical port infrastructure, energy facilities, or military-industrial complex sites in southern Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Achieve Breakthroughs on Eastern Front: Continue attritional pressure and localized breakthroughs, particularly west of Avdiivka, to expand salients and threaten key UAF logistics. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Counter UAF Drone Superiority: Deploy sophisticated EW systems to counter UAF's tactical drone advantage. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Courses of Action:
  • MLCOA: Prioritize and expand the Kharkiv offensive. RF will likely attempt to seize Vovchansk and establish a deeper zone of control. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA: Sustain high-intensity mechanized assaults west of Avdiivka. RF will continue to use combined arms, including thermobaric systems. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA: Focus adaptive drone and missile strikes on Odesa infrastructure. RF will likely continue to direct drone waves and potentially ballistic missiles towards port facilities, energy, or military targets in Odesa region, adapting to UAF air defenses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • MLCOA: Intensify internal information control and counter-mobilization narratives. RF will continue to use legal and media mechanisms to manage public opinion and punish perceived detractors, while also trying to undermine Ukrainian mobilization efforts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• New Drone Target Prioritization: Observed shift of drone groups over the Black Sea towards Odesa. This indicates a dynamic and flexible targeting strategy for RF's UAV campaign. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Continued Ballistic Missile Threat: Sustained readiness for ballistic missile employment from the south-east underscores a persistent, high-speed strike capability. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Information Warfare Focus: RF sources attempting to discredit UAF commitment and capabilities near Konstantinovka (claims of police battalions) indicate a focus on undermining UAF morale and perception of strength. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• Logistical Buildup: Confirmed significant logistical buildup in Belgorod Oblast directly supports the new Kharkiv offensive. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Drone Supply: The ability to launch multi-vector drone attacks, alongside RF claims of numerous interceptions (21 over Bryansk), suggests RF maintains a substantial supply of UAVs for sustained operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Internal Infrastructure Degradation (Localized): Video from Donetsk suggesting water shortages may indicate localized infrastructure problems in temporarily occupied areas, potentially impacting civilian support and long-term sustainment for RF. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• Adaptive Drone/Missile C2: The observed re-routing of drone groups and current ballistic missile threat indicates a functional and somewhat agile C2 system for UAV and missile operations, allowing for dynamic target selection or response to UAF air defense. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Multi-Front Coordination: RF's ability to open a new front in Kharkiv while maintaining pressure on existing fronts suggests a degree of effective operational-level C2 for force allocation and synchronization. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
• EW C2 Integration: The deployment of new EW systems implies a level of C2 integration to counter UAF drone operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Air Defense Responsiveness: UAF Air Force demonstrates high readiness and effective early warning, providing timely updates on RF drone and ballistic missile threats. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) However, the sheer volume and adaptive nature of RF attacks pose a continuous strain. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Multi-Front Defense: UAF forces are heavily engaged defending against simultaneous major offensives in Kharkiv, west of Avdiivka, and sustained pressure in Chasiv Yar. This indicates significant strain on available manpower and resources. RF claims of UAF deploying police battalions near Konstantinovka, if true, would suggest a severe strain on regular military units and an ad-hoc defensive posture. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Deep Strike Capability: UAF continues to demonstrate capability for deep strikes into RF territory using UAVs, causing disruptions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Counter-EW Adaptation: UAF units on the Southern Axis are actively assessing and adapting to the new 'Pole-21' EW variant. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • Stabilized Chasiv Yar FLOT: Despite intense pressure, UAF has held the line in the Kanal district for the past 24 hours. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Effective Deep Strikes: Continued reports of UAF drone activity over RF territory (Bryansk Oblast) demonstrate sustained deep strike capabilities. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Information Operations Impact: UAF-aligned channels effectively highlighting RF internal issues (Donetsk water shortages) can impact RF morale and support. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Setbacks:
  • New Kharkiv Offensive: The most significant setback, as RF forces have opened a new axis and seized several border settlements, creating a new operational challenge. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Tactical Gains West of Avdiivka: RF forces have made further tactical gains near Ocheretyne, exacerbated by the use of TOS-1A systems. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Adaptive RF Drone Threat (Odesa): The re-routing of RF drones towards Odesa represents an evolving threat that requires continuous adaptation of UAF air defense strategies for critical southern cities. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Ballistic Missile Threat: The immediate threat of ballistic missile employment from the south-east poses a significant challenge for UAF air defense. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • New EW Threat: The 'Pole-21' variant on the Southern Axis poses a significant new challenge to UAF drone operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • ATACMS Restriction: US prohibition on using ATACMS for deep strikes into RF territory limits UAF's long-range precision strike capabilities. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Manpower & Reserves: The opening of the Kharkiv front and sustained high-intensity operations on the Eastern Front place immense strain on UAF manpower and strategic reserves, necessitating rapid deployment of tactical reserves. RF claims regarding police battalions highlight potential constraints. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Air Defense Capacity: The adaptive nature of RF drone attacks, the pervasive glide bomb threat, and the new ballistic missile threat reinforce the urgent and continuous need for robust, multi-layered air defense systems and interceptor munitions, especially for protecting critical urban and industrial centers (Odesa, Dnipro, Kremenchuk) and frontline units. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Counter-EW Capabilities: Urgent requirement for advanced counter-EW measures and training to mitigate the effects of systems like the new 'Pole-21' variant, safeguarding UAF drone ISR and C2. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Precision Long-Range Strike Ammunition: Continued need for precision long-range strike capabilities to target RF logistical hubs and high-value assets. The reported ATACMS restriction is a significant constraint. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• ISR for Drone/Missile Threat: Enhanced ISR capabilities are required to quickly identify new RF drone launch sites, ballistic missile launch preparations, C2 nodes for re-tasking, and primary/secondary target sets for these dynamically routed threats. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Propaganda:
  • Discrediting UAF Commitment: Военкор Котенок's claim of UAF deploying police battalions near Konstantinovka aims to portray UAF as desperate, suffering heavy losses, and using inadequately trained forces. This is a common tactic to demoralize opponents. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Internal Unity/External Blame: TASS report on India-Russia oil trade reinforces a narrative of continued international economic relations despite Western pressure. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Amplifying Western Restrictions: Russian sources (Рыбарь, Операция Z, Военкор Котенок, Colonelcassad) are actively amplifying the Wall Street Journal report about US restrictions on ATACMS use, aiming to highlight UAF's limitations, sow distrust between Ukraine and its allies, and potentially boost RF morale. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Celebrating Military Effectiveness: Colonelcassad's video showing "Anvar Detachment" strikes on UAF positions aims to demonstrate RF military capability and success. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• UAF Counter-Propaganda/Messaging:
  • Highlighting RF Failures/Hardship: Шеф Hayabusa🫡🇺🇦's video of rainwater collection in Donetsk highlights infrastructure and humanitarian challenges in occupied territories, aiming to undermine RF's governance narrative and potentially sow discontent among the local population. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Transparency on Threats: UAF Air Force's timely warnings about drone and ballistic missile threats maintain public trust and provide essential information. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukrainian Public: The ongoing threats from drones (Odesa) and ballistic missiles will undoubtedly increase anxiety in southern regions. The new offensive in Kharkiv will continue to cause significant concern. Transparency from UAF Air Force helps manage this, but the cumulative pressure is high. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• RF Public: Reports of UAV interceptions over Bryansk Oblast will reinforce the perception of ongoing threats within RF territory. The amplification of US ATACMS restrictions might boost morale for those supporting the war, but the actual impact of UAF drone strikes on internal RF security remains a source of public anxiety. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE) Images of hardship in occupied Donetsk (water shortages) could contribute to a negative perception of RF's ability to govern occupied territories, potentially affecting public sentiment in the long run. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• US Restrictions: The repeated emphasis by Russian sources on the Wall Street Journal report concerning US restrictions on ATACMS use deep into RF territory is a critical point. It highlights a continuing point of contention or strategic disagreement between Ukraine and its key ally, potentially affecting UAF's operational planning and effectiveness. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Indian Neutrality/Economic Pragmatism: TASS report on India's oil purchasing policy indicates India's continued focus on economic interests, maintaining a degree of distance from Western sanctions regimes against RF. This suggests that some international actors continue to engage with RF, undermining the effectiveness of broad isolation efforts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
• Broader Strategic Posturing: (No new information, but continues to influence context) The US Navy E-6B Mercury deployment to Greenland (reported by Newsweek/TASS) indicates broader NATO/US strategic positioning. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

• MLCOA 1: Prioritized Offensive in Kharkiv Oblast to Seize Vovchansk and Expand Buffer Zone. RF will commit additional forces and resources to consolidate gains, establish control over Vovchansk, and expand their zone of influence in northern Kharkiv, aiming to fix UAF reserves and create a deeper "buffer" against cross-border attacks. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Confirmed opening of a new axis with significant logistical buildup and stated RF objectives of creating a buffer.
• MLCOA 2: Sustained and Intensified Mechanized Assaults West of Avdiivka, Supported by Thermobaric Systems. RF will continue to leverage armored and mechanized units, supported by heavy artillery and TOS-1A systems, to expand the Ocheretyne salient and threaten key UAF logistical lines towards Pokrovsk. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Consistent RF strategy, recent tactical gains, and observed increase in TOS-1A usage.
• MLCOA 3: Adaptive and Concentrated Drone/Missile Campaign against Critical Infrastructure in Odesa. RF will continue to direct drone waves towards Odesa's port, energy, and transportation infrastructure, potentially augmented by ballistic missile strikes, adapting targeting based on real-time intelligence and UAF air defense responses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: Observed new drone groups towards Odesa and active ballistic missile threats from the south-east. RF seeks to degrade Ukraine's military-industrial and port capacity.
• MLCOA 4: Increased EW Activity and Glide Bomb Usage Across Frontlines. RF will intensify the use of EW systems, particularly the new 'Pole-21' variant, to disrupt UAF drone operations. Concurrently, glide bomb attacks will remain a primary tactic to support ground assaults and suppress UAF defenses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: New EW deployment and consistent reliance on glide bombs.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

• MDCOA 1: Rapid Operational Breakthrough in Kharkiv Oblast, Threatening Kharkiv City. Should UAF fail to rapidly reinforce and stabilize the new Kharkiv front, RF forces could achieve a rapid operational breakthrough, pushing deeper towards key population centers or threatening the city of Kharkiv itself, potentially overwhelming local defenses. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: The new offensive axis is designed to create this threat. A collapse of defenses could lead to a significant territorial loss and humanitarian crisis, forcing a strategic withdrawal or costly counter-offensive.
• MDCOA 2: Coordinated Air/Missile/Drone Campaign to Sever a Major Ukrainian Logistics Hub in Western Ukraine, or a Major Southern Port. RF could execute a highly coordinated, multi-domain attack (massed missiles, glide bombs, multiple waves of UAVs) against a critical logistics hub (e.g., major rail junction in central/western Ukraine, or a critical port in the south like Odesa), aiming to severely disrupt UAF supply lines to the front and international trade. This would be exacerbated by the ATACMS restrictions. (MEDIUM CONFIDENCE)
  • Reasoning: This is within RF capabilities and, if successful, could have significant operational consequences for UAF's ability to sustain forces and export goods, particularly if UAF long-range counter-strike options are limited.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Next 24-48 Hours:
  • Kharkiv Offensive: High likelihood of continued intense fighting and RF attempts to expand control in Kharkiv Oblast, particularly towards Vovchansk. (DECISION POINT: Immediate allocation of tactical reserves and fire support to stabilize the Vovchansk axis and establish new defensive lines. Consider pre-emptive counter-fire against detected RF logistical hubs in Belgorod Oblast if targets are within approved strike parameters.)
  • Eastern Front (Avdiivka/Chasiv Yar): Continued high-intensity assaults west of Avdiivka, with a focus on widening the salient. Chasiv Yar likely to see renewed concentrated assaults. (DECISION POINT: Prioritization of resupply, counter-battery fire, and reinforcement for frontline units in these sectors, particularly targeting TOS-1A systems and identified RF police battalion deployment if confirmed.)
  • RF Drone/Missile Threat (Odesa/Southern-East): High likelihood of sustained RF drone and potential ballistic missile attacks, with Odesa as a primary target. UAF air defense will remain heavily engaged. (DECISION POINT: Dynamic allocation of air defense assets based on evolving threat vectors and intelligence on RF drone staging areas and missile launch preparations. Reinforce Odesa air defenses.)
  • UAF Deep Operations: UAF deep strike operations into RF territory are likely to continue. (DECISION POINT: Assessment of target effectiveness for deep strikes, ensuring maximum impact on RF logistics/morale with minimal risk to UAF assets, considering ATACMS restrictions.)
• Next 72 Hours:
  • RF Offensive Momentum: RF will seek to maintain the initiative on the Kharkiv and Avdiivka axes. If UAF stabilization efforts are insufficient, further RF gains are probable. (DECISION POINT: Strategic review of force allocation across all fronts to prevent critical overstretch, potentially requiring difficult choices regarding defensive priorities.)
  • RF Drone/Missile Campaign Refinement: RF may further refine drone and missile tactics, including saturation attacks or complex flight paths, in response to UAF air defense effectiveness. (DECISION POINT: Review and adaptation of UAF air defense TTPs, and intelligence focus on RF drone/missile command-and-control capabilities and potential new launch sites.)
  • EW Countermeasures: UAF will need to quickly implement and test new counter-EW TTPs against the 'Pole-21' variant. (DECISION POINT: Rapid dissemination of counter-EW protocols and technical solutions to affected frontline units.)

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

6.1. Intelligence Gaps

• RF "North" Group of Forces ORBAT and End-State Objectives: Full order of battle, specific unit compositions, and ultimate strategic objectives for the new Kharkiv offensive. This includes understanding the depth of their intended advance and the specific objectives beyond Vovchansk.
• RF Second Echelon Forces (Kharkiv/Avdiivka): Strength, disposition, and readiness of RF second-echelon forces positioned to exploit gains or reinforce the Kharkiv and Ocheretyne salients.
• RF Drone/Ballistic Missile Targeting Prioritization for Odesa: Precise identification of RF's primary target sets for the shifted drone/missile campaign against Odesa (e.g., specific port infrastructure, naval assets, energy facilities, industrial plants, military depots).
• 'Pole-21' EW Variant Capabilities and Vulnerabilities: Detailed technical capabilities, effective range, operating frequencies, and potential vulnerabilities of the new 'Pole-21' EW system.
• UAF Police Battalion Deployment (Konstantinovka): Confirmation of RF claims regarding the deployment of UAF police battalions near Konstantinovka, including their actual role, strength, and equipment, and true casualty figures.
• RF Public Sentiment on Occupied Areas: Deeper understanding of the impact of infrastructure degradation (e.g., water shortages in Donetsk) on public sentiment and internal stability within RF-occupied territories.

6.2. Collection Requirements

• IMINT/ELINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - Kharkiv Axis): Immediately task all available ISR assets to the Belgorod-Kharkiv border area and the Vovchansk axis to identify follow-on forces, command posts, logistical nodes (fuel, ammo depots), and new defensive lines supporting the "North" Group of Forces. Focus on identifying potential staging areas for further advances.
• IMINT/ELINT/SIGINT (HIGH PRIORITY - Eastern Front): Intensify collection on RF C2 nodes, artillery positions (especially TOS-1A launchers), and logistics hubs supporting the Avdiivka/Ocheretyne axis and Chasiv Yar. Monitor for indications of RF regrouping or preparation for renewed assaults, and verify claims of UAF police battalion deployments.
• ELINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - EW Threat): Dedicated collection to characterize the new 'Pole-21' EW variant, including its operating frequencies, jamming techniques, and impact on UAF drone C2/data links. Rapid technical exploitation is critical.
• IMINT/ELINT/SIGINT (CRITICAL PRIORITY - Drone/Ballistic Missile Campaign): Intensify collection on drone launch sites in RF territory and RF-occupied Ukraine (especially in the Black Sea region) to understand new deployment patterns and target preferences. Monitor RF air defense radar and communication frequencies for indications of C2 adaptations and vulnerabilities. Prioritize monitoring for ballistic missile launch preparations from the south-east.
• OSINT/Media Monitoring (HIGH PRIORITY): Monitor RF and Ukrainian social media, local news, and official statements for information related to drone/missile damage assessments, civilian impact in targeted areas (Odesa), and further details on internal RF issues (e.g., Donetsk water shortages). Focus on RF narratives concerning UAF police battalion deployments and the impact of ATACMS restrictions.
• HUMINT (ONGOING): Seek information from sources regarding RF drone/missile operator training, C2 protocols for dynamic re-routing, internal assessments of UAF air defense effectiveness, and any intelligence on RF plans for the Kharkiv axis and southern offensives.
• IMINT/SARINT (Targeted): Prioritize overhead imagery of critical infrastructure in Odesa and other potential southern targets, and RF logistical hubs within strike range, for pre- and post-strike damage assessment.

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Reinforce Kharkiv Axis Immediately (CRITICAL): Rapidly deploy strategic and tactical reserves to reinforce the Vovchansk axis and establish robust new defensive lines to slow the enemy advance, prevent a rapid operational breakthrough, and stabilize the new front. Prioritize anti-armor and counter-battery assets.
2. Enhance Air Defense for Southern Ukraine (CRITICAL): Prioritize deployment of additional mobile air defense systems and C-UAS capabilities to protect Odesa. Implement dynamic, multi-layered air defense strategies to counter shifting RF drone trajectories and ballistic missile threats. Integrate real-time intelligence on drone/missile paths into air defense command systems.
3. Prioritize Deep Strike Targeting (HIGH): Prioritize long-range precision fires (within current capabilities and restrictions) against identified RF logistical buildup in Belgorod Oblast (supporting Kharkiv offensive), TOS-1A systems near Ocheretyne, and critical RF drone launch/C2 sites. Exploit any detected vulnerabilities in RF logistics or C2.
4. Develop and Disseminate Counter-EW Measures (HIGH): Rapidly analyze intelligence on the new 'Pole-21' variant. Develop and immediately disseminate updated TTPs, frequency hopping protocols, and hardware/software adaptations for UAF drone and EW units on the Southern Axis to mitigate its effects.
5. Counter RF Information Operations (HIGH): Actively counter RF narratives (e.g., regarding UAF police battalions) with factual reporting and evidence. Amplify information regarding RF internal hardships (e.g., Donetsk water shortages) and the impact of UAF deep strikes through targeted information operations to exacerbate internal friction and undermine public trust.
6. International Diplomatic Engagement (ONGOING): Continue to leverage evidence of both RF aggression (new Kharkiv offensive, civilian infrastructure targeting, ballistic missile threats) in diplomatic efforts to secure additional air defense systems, counter-EW technologies, and critically, long-range precision strike capabilities without restrictions. Emphasize the urgent need for support to counter multi-front offensives.