Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (SITREP)

TIME: 120811Z AUG 25

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Chernihiv Oblast (Honcharivske): Continued enemy reconnaissance UAV activity. NEW: Russian military bloggers ("НгП раZVедка", "Военкор Котенок") claim a successful Russian strike on the 262nd Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) training center in the Honcharivske area, with claims of Ukrainian acknowledgment. This indicates RF deep strike capability and targeting of rear-area training facilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for claim, MEDIUM for confirmed BDA).
• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Vilnohirsk): Continued reports of Russian strikes and casualties in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, corroborating persistent indirect fire. Ukrainian SBU reports the detention of a spy collecting information on UA Air Defense (AD) units and military echelons in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, highlighting the ongoing Russian intelligence collection efforts in the region. Ukrainian Air Force issues a threat warning for aviation weapon employment in Synelnykivskyi district. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Svatove-Kreminna Axis (Lyman/Kupyansk Directions): No new specific tactical updates in this latest tranche. Previous intelligence of concentrated forces (3+ MRRs) west of Svatove, probing attacks southwest of Kreminna, and new EW tactics remain highly relevant and indicate an imminent major offensive. NEW: Ukrainian source "БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС" (63rd Brigade) claims a successful ATGM strike on a Russian target in the Lyman area, confirming continued combat engagement. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for continued activity and force concentration; HIGH for FPV drone usage; HIGH for continued combat).
• Donetsk Oblast (Rodinskoye, Kolodezi, Krasnoarmeysk-Dobropilye, Pokrovske, Bilozerske, Yablonovka, Katerynivka): Ukrainian Air Force reports new launches of guided aerial bombs (KABs) by enemy tactical aviation on Donetsk Oblast, confirming continued deep strike threats in this critical sector. A 'БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС' video shows the aftermath of a successful Ukrainian drone strike (WORMBUSTERS 414th UAV Brigade) on a Russian position near Pokrovske, indicating effective counter-operations. NEW: Russian MoD claims "liberation" of Yablonovka by "Tsentr Group of Forces" motor rifle units, detailing tactical approaches through forest belts and use of drones, indicating localized RF advances and combined arms tactics. Russian "Народная милиция ДНР" claims liquidation of a UAF UAV control point near Katerynivka, with drone footage showing a heavily damaged settlement, suggesting ongoing targeting of UA drone infrastructure. 'Два майора' claims Russian Army successes on the Pokrovske direction, conflicting with UA reports. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for KAB strikes and UA drone effectiveness; MEDIUM for conflicting RF claims and RF claims of advances; MEDIUM for RF claim of UAV control point destruction).
• Sumy Oblast (Volna Sloboda): 'Дневник Десантника🇷🇺' posts video of 'tactical work' at Volna Sloboda, 11 km from the state border, showing Russian drone activity and possible fire effects, indicating continued Russian presence or reconnaissance close to the border. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Kharkiv Oblast: 'Colonelcassad' video claiming liquidation of 5 UAF personnel near Kupyansk, indicates continued combat in the region. No new strike reports for Kharkiv specifically within this update.
• Zaporizhzhia Oblast: Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration reports three casualties remaining in hospitals after the latest enemy attack on Zaporizhzhia, confirming persistent Russian strikes on the area. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Central Russia (Moscow Oblast, Voronezh Oblast, Kuban, Crimea, Anapa, Gelendzhik, Samara, Ulyanovsk, Kursk, Tatarstan): Russian 'Военкор Котенок' shares video of the apprehension of an alleged Ukrainian-recruited terrorist in Moscow Oblast, claiming the prevention of a bomb attack targeting a high-ranking MoD official. ASTRA and 'Операция Z' (via 'Военкоры Русской Весны') report that Russian government decrees now grant 'combat veteran' status to participants in the 'defense' of border regions, including Voronezh, Crimea, Kuban, Anapa, and Gelendzhik. This indicates RF's formal recognition of cross-border attacks and the need to bolster morale and compensate personnel in these areas. NEW: Rosaviatsia reports flight restrictions lifted in Samara and Ulyanovsk airports, suggesting previous drone activity or other security concerns. NEW: Ukrainian source "Оперативний ЗСУ" and "ASTRA" report drone attacks in Tatarstan, with ASTRA claiming "presumed hits," indicating continued UA deep strikes into RF territory. TASS reports a memorial service in Kursk for the "Kursk" submarine crew. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for RF claims of prevention and veteran status decrees; MEDIUM for veracity of terror plot claims; HIGH for flight restrictions and Tatarstan drone attacks; LOW for specific BDA in Tatarstan).
• Dnieper River (Right Bank): Russian 'Mash na Donbasse' claims their howitzers destroyed UAF drone control points on the right bank of the Dnieper River, accompanied by video footage of artillery shelling a village. This suggests RF is actively targeting UA drone infrastructure across the Dnieper, likely to degrade UA reconnaissance and FPV capabilities in the southern theater. NEW: "Народная милиция ДНР" claims a similar "liquidation" of a UAF UAV control point near Katerynivka. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - for RF claims; HIGH - for continued RF counter-drone efforts).
• Belarus: TASS reports that Belarusian-Russian exercises "Zapad-2025" will take place from 12-16 September, focusing on repelling air attacks and combating enemy sabotage groups. NEW: "Операция Z" reiterates the "Zapad-2025" exercise schedule. This confirms the continued military cooperation and joint training between Belarus and Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Moldova (Chisinau): Ukrainian source STERNENKO reports a pro-Russian oligarch, Ilan Shor, intends to seize the Great National Assembly Square in Chisinau, indicating potential Russian-backed political destabilization efforts in Moldova. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Georgia: TASS reports Georgian Interior Ministry's Migration Department deported 34 foreigners, including Russian citizens, with entry banned, indicating internal security measures potentially related to regional tensions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• No new specific weather information. Continued drone activity in Chernihiv and Sumy Oblasts, the Dnieper River area, and Tatarstan suggests conditions remain conducive for UAV operations. The large-scale military exercises "Zapad-2025" are planned for September, indicating an anticipation of suitable weather for large maneuvers. RF propaganda video showing military aviation suggests clear flying conditions are present or anticipated. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• Ukrainian Forces: UAF maintains defensive posture, responding to RF advances and deep strikes. The SBU's detention of a spy in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast highlights active counter-intelligence efforts. Successful drone operations (WORMBUSTERS 414th UAV Brigade) near Pokrovske and ATGM strikes (63rd Brigade) near Lyman demonstrate continued tactical effectiveness. UAF Air Force issues KAB threat warnings for Donetsk Oblast, indicating active monitoring. UAF continues to counter RF information operations. NEW: "РБК-Україна" reports that combat battalions will receive 7 million UAH for weapons, indicating ongoing resource allocation for frontline units. Continued drone attacks on RF territory (Tatarstan) demonstrate UA deep strike capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces: RF continues offensive operations in Eastern Ukraine (Kupyansk, Pokrovske directions, claims in Yablonovka), deep strikes (KABs on Donetsk, claims of drone control points on Dnieper/Katerynivka), and indirect fire (Zaporizhzhia). RF is actively engaging in intelligence collection (spy in Dnipropetrovsk). RF is also conducting recruitment propaganda ("Fighterbomber" video showcasing aerospace forces). RF is formally recognizing and compensating personnel involved in "defending" border regions and Crimea. RF is also consolidating military cooperation with Belarus through "Zapad-2025" exercises. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). RF is actively engaging in information warfare and attempting to portray military power through propaganda (Fighterbomber video of Russian aerospace forces).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities:
  • Offensive Maneuver (Eastern Front): RF maintains capability for localized ground assaults, particularly in Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovske, Yablonovka directions). The confirmed force concentration on the Svatove-Kreminna axis from previous reports indicates a significant offensive capability being assembled. RF claims in Yablonovka detail combined arms tactics using drones and infantry. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Deep Strike (UAV/Missile/KAB): Continued use of KABs on Donetsk Oblast confirms persistent capability to conduct deep strikes. Claims of destroying UA drone control points on the Dnieper and near Katerynivka indicate targeted counter-UAV efforts via artillery/drone. RF air assets shown in "Fighterbomber" video reinforce airpower capability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Counter-Intelligence & Internal Security: RF demonstrates robust internal security capabilities, as evidenced by the alleged prevention of a terror attack in Moscow Oblast and the rapid dissemination of related propaganda. RF lifting flight restrictions in Samara/Ulyanovsk after apparent drone activity indicates responsive security measures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Warfare/Recruitment: RF is actively engaged in recruitment campaigns, leveraging financial incentives and patriotic appeals (Alex Parker Returns video) and showcasing military power ("Fighterbomber" video). They also disseminate content from military bloggers and official sources to shape narratives of success and UAF weakness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Military Training: RF, in conjunction with Belarus, is capable of conducting large-scale joint exercises, reinforcing interoperability and demonstrating a readiness for combined arms operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Advance in Donetsk Oblast: RF's primary intention remains to push westwards through Donetsk Oblast, aiming for strategic objectives. The continued KAB strikes and claims of advances in Yablonovka signify an intent to soften defenses and demoralize the civilian population. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Launch Major Offensive (Svatove-Kreminna): The force concentration and EW tactics previously identified confirm the intention for an imminent large-scale ground offensive to achieve a tactical breakthrough. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Degrade UA Capabilities: Continued deep strikes on various targets, including claimed drone control points, aim to disrupt Ukraine's war-fighting capabilities. Intelligence collection on UA AD units underscores an intention to suppress or bypass UA air defenses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Maintain Pressure on Multiple Fronts: RF continues to probe and fix UA forces along various axes (Sumy border, Dnieper) to prevent redeployment of reserves, while focusing main efforts on the Svatove-Kreminna and Donetsk axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Control Information Space & Justify Actions: RF continues to promote its version of events, including the alleged Moscow Oblast terror plot and military successes (e.g., Yablonovka), to portray Ukraine as a terrorist state, justify aggression, and rally domestic support. The new veteran status for border defenders reinforces this. Recruitment propaganda aims to sustain force generation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Regional Destabilization (Moldova): Potential intent to destabilize neighboring states via proxy political actors (Ilan Shor) to divert attention or create new pressure points. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• RF:
  • Targeting UA Drone Infrastructure: Specific targeting of UA drone control points on the Dnieper River and near Katerynivka indicates an adaptation to counter Ukraine's effective UAS use. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Formal Recognition of Border Combatants: Granting 'combat veteran' status to personnel involved in 'defense' of Russian border regions and Crimea acknowledges the reality of cross-border engagements and serves as a morale and retention measure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations and Internal Security Linkage: The rapid and well-publicized prevention of the alleged Moscow Oblast terror attack, with video evidence, demonstrates an adaptive approach to leveraging internal security events for information warfare purposes. NEW: "Fighterbomber" propaganda video highlights the use of high-quality, professional military footage for morale and recruitment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • EW Tactical Evolution: (Reiterated from previous daily report) Shift from broad-area jamming to localized "EW bubbles" protecting assault groups. This indicates a more sophisticated and tactically integrated approach to EW, directly supporting offensive maneuver. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Claimed Advances with Drone Support: RF claims in Yablonovka specifically highlight the use of drones for escort and reconnaissance during advances, indicating an adaptation in infantry tactics to integrate UAS. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• UA:
  • Effective Counter-UAS Operations: The "WORMBUSTERS 414th UAV Brigade" demonstrating successful drone strikes against Russian positions indicates effective tactical employment of UAVs. NEW: The 63rd Brigade's successful ATGM strike near Lyman demonstrates continued effectiveness of precision-guided munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Active Counter-Intelligence: The SBU's detention of an alleged spy in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast highlights proactive measures to disrupt Russian intelligence gathering. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Deep Strike Capabilities: Continued drone attacks on targets within Russian territory (Tatarstan) demonstrate a sustained capability for long-range precision strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF: Alex Parker Returns' recruitment propaganda, focusing on financial incentives, suggests continued efforts to address manpower needs. "Fighterbomber" video showcasing military hardware is also part of this. No new information on material logistics beyond previous reports of Starobilsk convoys (indicating offensive sustainment) and persistent domestic supply chain concerns (uniforms). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Belarus/Russia: The announcement of "Zapad-2025" exercises indicates ongoing efforts to maintain logistical interoperability and readiness for large-scale combined operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• UA: NEW: "РБК-Україна" reports 7 million UAH allocated to combat battalions for weapons, indicating continued central support for frontline units and addressing resource requirements. Previous reports on unit-level fundraising (Rubizh Brigade) and Polish ammunition production indicate ongoing needs and external support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF: RF C2 demonstrates continued ability to coordinate deep strikes (KABs on Donetsk, claimed strike on Honcharivske training center) and targeted artillery/drone strikes (Dnieper drone control points, Katerynivka). The swift action and public messaging around the alleged Moscow Oblast terror plot prevention showcase effective coordination between security services and propaganda outlets. The upcoming "Zapad-2025" exercises with Belarus also highlight robust C2 in joint planning. RF claims of "liberating" Yablonovka with detailed tactical coordination indicate effective C2 at the operational-tactical level. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• UA: UA C2 actively issues threat warnings (Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk KABs) and conducts counter-intelligence operations (SBU spy detention), indicating effective situational awareness and responsive C2. The successful drone strike near Pokrovske and ATGM strike near Lyman demonstrate effective tactical C2 and ISR integration. Allocation of funds to battalions indicates responsive central C2 for resource distribution. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Defensive Posture: UAF maintains a defensive posture across the front lines, particularly in Donetsk and in anticipation of the Svatove-Kreminna offensive. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Active Counter-Intelligence: The SBU's successful interception of a spy demonstrates strong counter-intelligence capabilities vital for protecting military assets and operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Tactical Drone and ATGM Effectiveness: Units like the "WORMBUSTERS 414th UAV Brigade" and the 63rd Brigade continue to demonstrate high proficiency in tactical drone operations for ISR and precision strikes, and ATGM employment, adapting to battlefield conditions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Air Defense Vigilance: UAF Air Force is actively monitoring and issuing warnings for Russian aviation threats, indicating high readiness for air defense engagements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Resource Allocation for Frontline: Allocation of funds for weapons to combat battalions indicates continued commitment to equipping and sustaining frontline units. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Success (Counter-Intelligence): SBU detention of a spy in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast is a significant success in degrading Russian intelligence capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Success (Tactical Strike): The successful drone strike by the "WORMBUSTERS 414th UAV Brigade" on a Russian position near Pokrovske is a direct tactical success. NEW: The 63rd Brigade's ATGM strike near Lyman is another direct tactical success. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Success (Deep Strikes): Reports of drone attacks in Tatarstan indicate continued UA capability to strike deep into RF territory, maintaining pressure on the RF rear. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Civilian Casualties/Damage): Continued strikes on Zaporizhzhia with resulting casualties, and new KAB strikes on Donetsk, highlight ongoing challenges in protecting civilian infrastructure and lives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (RF Propaganda/Terrorism Claims): The well-orchestrated RF narrative around the alleged Moscow Oblast terror plot (regardless of veracity) represents a significant information warfare challenge for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Challenge (RF Targeting of Drone Infrastructure): RF claims of destroying UA drone control points (Dnieper, Katerynivka) indicate an emerging tactical challenge for UA UAS operations, requiring adapted operational security and dispersion. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Challenge (RF Claimed Strike on Training Center): RF claims of striking a UA training center in Honcharivske, if true, represent a setback for force generation and readiness. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Challenge (RF Claims of Local Advances): RF claims of "liberating" Yablonovka indicate localized setbacks for UAF defensive efforts in Donetsk. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Counter-Intelligence Capabilities: Continued investment in counter-intelligence assets and training is crucial to counter persistent Russian espionage efforts, especially concerning air defense and logistics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Air Defense Assets: The continued threat of KABs and other aviation-launched munitions on Donetsk and other front-line areas, and alleged strikes on training centers, necessitates robust and mobile air defense systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• UAS & Counter-C2 Protection: Measures to protect drone control points and communication links from RF artillery and EW are increasingly critical, as evidenced by RF claims. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Information Warfare Capabilities: Sustained and adaptive information warfare capabilities are required to counter aggressive Russian propaganda campaigns (e.g., terror plot claims, veteran status for border defenders, military might videos). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Force Generation Protection: Protection of training centers from deep strikes is critical to maintain force generation capacity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Internal Cohesion/Morale: RF continues to use internal narratives to boost morale and justify the war. The immediate announcement and video evidence of the alleged Moscow Oblast terror plot is a major propaganda push to portray Ukraine as a terrorist state and rally domestic support. Granting "combat veteran" status to those in border regions and Crimea acknowledges the reality of cross-border attacks but also aims to boost morale and ensure loyalty. 'Alex Parker Returns' recruitment video and "Fighterbomber" video (showcasing military aviation) actively use financial incentives, patriotic slogans, and displays of military power to attract new personnel and project strength. Celebration of Air Force Day continues to foster military pride. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• RF Claims of UA Weakness/Terrorism: The central narrative being pushed by RF is that Ukraine is resorting to "terrorism" (alleged Moscow plot) and is in a "hopeless situation" (Podubnyy |Z|O|V| edition's commentary on Zelenskyy's nervousness). This aims to demoralize Ukraine and discourage international support. RF claims of striking UA training centers and UAV control points reinforce this narrative of degrading UA capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• UA Counter-Narratives & Transparency: UA channels continue to report on Russian aggression (strikes on Zaporizhzhia, KABs on Donetsk) and SBU successes. UA efforts to highlight Russian weaknesses and internal issues (e.g., drone attacks on Tatarstan) are important counter-narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Geopolitical Narratives: TASS frames the potential Trump-Putin meeting as a "victory" for Moscow, aiming to project an image of diplomatic strength. The EU statement of support for Ukraine, signed by 26 member states (but notably not Hungary), highlights the ongoing, though not entirely unified, international support for Ukraine. Reports on a pro-Russian oligarch's intentions in Moldova could be part of a broader RF strategy to create new areas of instability. The Georgian deportation of Russian citizens indicates a potential for information operations regarding Russian diaspora. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukrainian Public: Civilian casualties in Zaporizhzhia and KAB strikes on Donetsk will continue to fuel public resolve against Russian aggression. SBU successes in thwarting espionage will be a morale boost. The RF "terror plot" narrative could cause concern but also reinforce a sense of being targeted by a dishonest enemy. Allocation of funds to combat battalions will boost military morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Public: News of alleged terror plots within Russia will likely increase public support for counter-terrorism measures and the ongoing "special military operation." The granting of veteran status to border defenders aims to acknowledge their sacrifices and reinforce a sense of shared national defense. However, continued drone attacks and security incidents within RF territory (Tatarstan, previous Samara/Ulyanovsk restrictions) will likely continue to erode the sense of internal security for the general population. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• EU Support: The joint statement by 26 EU member states reaffirming support for Ukraine, despite Hungary's abstention, demonstrates broad, though not entirely unified, European commitment. This is a critical indicator of continued political and potentially material support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• High-Level Diplomatic Engagement: The discussions around a potential Trump-Putin meeting on Alaska highlight the ongoing high-stakes diplomatic maneuvering related to the conflict. Russian media framing this as a "victory" for Moscow suggests an attempt to set expectations and influence the narrative surrounding any potential outcomes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Belarus-Russia Alignment: The announced "Zapad-2025" exercises further solidify the military and political alignment between Russia and Belarus, indicating continued Russian leverage over its neighbor and potential for using Belarusian territory for future operations or as a staging ground. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Moldova Destabilization: The report on Ilan Shor's intentions in Chisinau suggests a new potential area for Russian-backed destabilization efforts, which could draw international attention and resources. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Georgian Deportations: The deportation of Russian citizens from Georgia indicates ongoing regional complexities and potential for diplomatic friction that Russia may seek to exploit. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

• Major Offensive on Svatove-Kreminna Axis: Within the next 24-48 hours, RF will launch a multi-pronged ground offensive along the Svatove-Kreminna line, as indicated by previous force concentrations and EW adaptations. The objective will be to seize key terrain and disrupt Ukrainian defensive cohesion, forcing a tactical withdrawal. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Offensive in Donetsk Oblast: RF will maintain high pressure and conduct offensive operations along the Donetsk axis, focusing on seizing key terrain and achieving tactical breakthroughs towards Pokrovske. This will include continued indiscriminate FAB/KAB strikes on civilian and military targets in the area, and localized tactical advances supported by drones (e.g., Yablonovka tactics). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Persistent Deep Strikes into Ukraine & RF Airspace Defense: RF will continue to utilize KABs (now on Donetsk), UAVs, and ballistic missiles to target military infrastructure, logistics hubs, and military training units in Ukrainian rear areas (e.g., Honcharivske training center), as well as civilian targets. Concurrently, RF will maintain a high state of air defense readiness across its western and central territories, leading to dynamic flight restrictions and interception attempts against UA drones, while also leveraging internal security events for information warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Sustained Indirect Fire on Civilian Areas and UA Drone Infrastructure: RF will continue to employ artillery, mortars, and FPV drones against Ukrainian civilian population centers near the front lines and along the Dnieper River to exert psychological pressure and disrupt daily life. Targeted strikes on UA drone control points on the Dnieper and similar targets (e.g., Katerynivka) will continue. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Aggressive Information Warfare & Recruitment: RF will intensify efforts to shape narratives, particularly regarding UA losses and the futility of resistance, while attempting to undermine international support for Ukraine. They will actively use events like the alleged Moscow Oblast terror plot to reinforce anti-Ukrainian sentiment and justify aggression, complemented by polished military propaganda (e.g., "Fighterbomber" video). Recruitment efforts, leveraging financial incentives and patriotic appeals, will continue. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

• Decisive Breakthrough in Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovske/Kramatorsk Direction): RF achieves a rapid, decisive breakthrough along the Krasnoarmeysk-Dobropilye axis, leading to the collapse of a significant UAF defensive sector and enabling rapid exploitation towards Pokrovske/Kramatorsk. This would severely threaten Ukraine's main logistics and command nodes in Donetsk. The continued KAB strikes and conflicting claims on advances in this area elevate this threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Large-Scale Coordinated Deep Strike on Critical Infrastructure: RF conducts a coordinated, multi-wave attack (missiles and drones) on critical Ukrainian energy infrastructure (power plants, substations) or major logistics hubs (railway junctions, large depots) across several oblasts, aiming to severely disrupt military and civilian support capabilities ahead of winter. The increased range of KABs enhances this threat. This could be coupled with a physical assault on a key training facility to further degrade force generation. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Escalation of Cross-Border Ground Incursions (Feint/Diversion): The Svatove offensive is a feint designed to draw in Ukrainian reserves. The main RU effort will subsequently be launched in an unexpected sector, potentially further south towards Lyman or a new northern incursion (e.g., Sumy, Chernihiv) with increased ground forces, exploiting the redeployment of Ukrainian defenders. The sophisticated EW employment could be used to mask this larger maneuver. The KAB strikes on Sumy and drone activity near the border could be softening for such an incursion. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Provocation/Destabilization in Moldova: Russian-backed political actors or proxies instigate widespread unrest or attempts to seize government buildings in Moldova, potentially escalating into a low-intensity conflict or requiring international intervention, diverting attention and resources from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Immediate (0-12 hours): Continued high alert for RF deep strikes (KABs on Donetsk, potential for more strikes in Dnipropetrovsk, potential for further strikes on training centers) and indirect fire across all active fronts and border areas. Intensified ground engagements are likely along the Kupyansk-Svatove-Kreminna and Donetsk axes. Decision point for UA: Immediate verification and response to new KAB strikes on Donetsk and alleged strikes on training centers. Enhance security measures for drone control points near the Dnieper.
• Within 24-48 hours: RF will likely launch its major ground offensive on the Svatove-Kreminna axis, and intensify ground operations in Donetsk Oblast, consistent with the MLCOA. Decision point for UA: Defensive adjustments and potential commitment of additional tactical reserves based on confirmed RF main effort and any achieved breakthroughs.
• Over the next 72 hours: Sustained RF deep strikes into Ukrainian territory and continued RF air defense responses to UA drone attacks (e.g., Tatarstan). RF will continue aggressive information warfare campaigns (e.g., "terror plot" narrative, military prowess videos). Decision point for UA: Assess the effectiveness of current air defense measures against RF deep strikes (especially KABs) and continue to adjust deep strike tactics to overcome RF air defenses. Maintain a unified and strong counter-narrative against RF propaganda.

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS

• Specifics of RF Objectives and Scale in Svatove-Kreminna: While an offensive is imminent, the precise timing, main effort axis, depth of penetration, and full scale of supporting RF forces in the Svatove-Kreminna offensive remain to be fully confirmed.
• BDA for Dnieper/Katerynivka Drone Control Point Strikes: Independent verification and Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) for the RF claims of destroying UA drone control points on the Dnieper's right bank and near Katerynivka.
• BDA for Honcharivske Training Center Strike: Independent verification and Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) for the RF claims of striking the 262nd UAF training center in Honcharivske. Assess personnel casualties and equipment losses.
• Impact of KABs on Donetsk: Specific targeting and BDA for the recent KAB strikes on Donetsk Oblast to assess the immediate impact and potential future threats.
• Full Scope of RF EW Capabilities and Countermeasures: Detailed intelligence on the specific capabilities and operational range of the newly deployed RF EW systems creating "bubbles," and their impact on various UA communication and ISR systems beyond UAS. This is critical for developing effective countermeasures.
• Verification of Moscow Oblast Terror Plot: Independent verification of the details surrounding the alleged terror plot in Moscow Oblast, including the identity and true affiliations of the detained individual, and the veracity of the claims. This is critical for countering RF information operations.
• Full Details of "Zapad-2025" Exercises: Detailed scenarios, participating units, and specific objectives of the "Zapad-2025" exercises beyond general air defense and counter-sabotage, particularly any implications for offensive capabilities near the Ukrainian border.
• Intentions and Capabilities of Ilan Shor in Moldova: Further intelligence on the true intentions and capabilities of Ilan Shor in Chisinau, and the extent of Russian backing for any destabilization efforts in Moldova.
• Effectiveness of UA Deep Strikes into RF: Detailed BDA for the drone attacks in Tatarstan and other RF internal targets to assess the military and psychological impact on RF.

7. RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Tactical/Operational:

   • Prioritize Svatove-Kreminna Defense: Immediately implement enhanced defensive preparations on the Svatove-Kreminna axis. Strengthen forward observation posts, pre-position artillery for counter-battery fire, and prepare for potential mass casualty events.
   • Counter RF EW: Immediately implement advanced counter-EW tactics for UAS operations on the Svatove-Kreminna front. Prioritize development and deployment of jammers/anti-jamming technology for UA UAS and communication systems. Task UAS operators to identify precise boundaries of RF EW "bubbles."
   • Enhance Air Defense Against KABs and Training Center Threats: Prioritize deployment of mobile, short-range air defense systems with good low-altitude tracking capabilities to the Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovske area, Bilozerske) and other areas now within KAB range. Disseminate intelligence on new KAB ranges to all affected units. Increase air defense vigilance and protection around critical training facilities and rear area logistics hubs.
   • Protect Drone Infrastructure: Implement enhanced operational security (OPSEC) and physical security measures for UA drone control points, especially along the Dnieper River and other frontline areas. Explore increased dispersion and mobility for these assets.
   • Reinforce Eastern Front Defenses: Based on continued RF pressure and the reported commitment of UA reserves, ensure defensive lines in the Kupyansk-Svatove-Kreminna and Donetsk sectors are optimized for expected RF thrusts. Maintain strong counter-battery fire.
   • Sustain Northern Border Vigilance: Maintain robust ISR and defensive measures along the Chernihiv and Sumy borders against persistent RF reconnaissance and potential deep strike threats.
   • Sustain Deep Strike Operations: Continue and expand deep strike drone operations into RF territory, targeting military-industrial sites, logistics, and critical infrastructure to disrupt RF war-making capacity and maintain internal pressure.

2. Strategic/Information Warfare:

   • Counter RF "Terror Plot" Narrative: Swiftly and decisively issue a formal statement refuting the RF claims of a Ukrainian-orchestrated terror plot in Moscow Oblast. Highlight RF's history of false flag operations and disinformation. Demand international investigation if possible.
   • Unified Refutation of Concession Claims: Issue clear, high-level, and frequent statements from the Office of the President, MFA, and MOD firmly refuting any claims of Ukraine's readiness to concede territory. Use all available platforms to counter this narrative, emphasizing Ukraine's unwavering commitment to its territorial integrity.
   • Amplify RF Internal Vulnerabilities: Systematically highlight RF logistical shortcomings and the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes on their military-industrial complex (as per previous reports) to undermine the narrative of RF strength. Also highlight RF domestic security issues (drone attacks and claimed terror plots), including security incidents that lead to flight restrictions.
   • Leverage Diplomatic Engagements: Actively engage with international partners to counter RF narratives in diplomatic circles, particularly regarding any "peace" talks that may undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Highlight Hungary's position as a potential point of diplomatic pressure. Monitor and counter Russian efforts to destabilize Moldova.

3. Collection Requirements:

   • IMINT/GEOINT: Prioritize high-resolution imagery over the Svatove-Kreminna and Donetsk axes for RF force movements, defensive fortifications, and any newly identified EW system deployments, especially any new main effort axes. Increase frequency of imagery over claimed strike sites (e.g., Dnieper drone control points, Katerynivka, Honcharivske training center) for BDA. Prioritize imagery over Tatarstan and other RF deep strike locations for BDA.
   • SIGINT: Intensify monitoring of RF military communications in Svatove-Kreminna and Donetsk Oblasts for breakthrough operations, EW activation patterns, and logistics interdiction. Focus on RF military-industrial communications for insights into the impact of deep strikes and production challenges. Monitor RF air defense networks for patterns and capabilities, particularly in response to UA drone activity and ballistic missile launches, especially in central and western RF. Prioritize intercepting and analyzing any unencrypted "IMPORTANT INFORMATION" content. Monitor RF internal security communications related to the alleged Moscow Oblast terror plot. Focus on C2 nodes in Dnipropetrovsk for potential threats from detained spy's network.
   • HUMINT/OSINT: Actively seek and verify information from within RF military circles regarding the impact of deep strikes and internal supply chain issues. Monitor international media and diplomatic channels for further reports or discussions on territorial concessions and gauge international reactions. Confirm the specifics of UA reserve redeployments, especially the Azov Corps. Monitor Russian military-focused Telegram channels for detailed combat reports, equipment requests, and any internal dissent related to EW effectiveness. Gather additional details on the alleged Moscow Oblast terror plot and the detained individual. Seek information on the political situation in Moldova and any specific Russian-backed destabilization plans. Gather independent verification of RF claims of advances (e.g., Yablonovka) and strikes (e.g., Honcharivske training center).

---

END OF REPORT