Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 030600Z AUG 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Southern Ukraine (Kherson Oblast): Confirmed severe damage to a bridge in Kherson with a large crater visible. Local authorities are urging evacuation of the Korabelny district due to disrupted gas supply. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) NEW intelligence indicates multiple additional impacts in the vicinity of the damaged bridge. RF sources (Colonelcassad) explicitly state "new hits in the area of the bridge... it would be good to have 2-3 more FABs into the damaged span to collapse it," suggesting deliberate targeting to achieve collapse. This directly impacts local logistics and civilian infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Southern Ukraine (Zaporizhzhia Oblast): IAEA reports explosions near the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP). Air raid alerts in Zaporizhzhia Oblast have been intermittent, indicating continued combat proximity to critical infrastructure. RF sources (TASS) claim RF forces are consolidating positions in Temirovka despite UA attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for ZNPP/alerts; MEDIUM for RF claim of consolidation; LOW for effectiveness of UA attacks from RF perspective) Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration issued a new alert. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Southern Ukraine (Mykolaiv Oblast): Continued reporting and visual evidence confirm significant damage to private residences in a Mykolaiv residential district from a missile strike. Three individuals hospitalized, others treated on-site. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Eastern Ukraine (Kharkiv Oblast): An enemy UAV was detected over Kharkiv, followed by an explosion. Another explosion was reported in Chuhuiv. UA Air Force confirmed Geran-2 type UAVs targeting Shevchenkivskyi district of Kharkiv, hitting a warehouse near residential buildings with no casualties. Explosions also reported in Chuhuiv, hitting a private residential area with three women suffering acute stress reactions, and Balakliia, where one person was injured from a drone hit. RF sources (Операция Z) claim control of the Hoptivka border checkpoint. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for drone detection and explosions; LOW for RF claim of Hoptivka control – no independent verification)
• Eastern Ukraine (Zaporizhzhia Oblast - Olhovske): RF sources claim successful artillery strikes by the 305th Artillery Brigade of the 5th Army Group "Vostok" against enemy targets in Olhovske. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - for claimed effectiveness; HIGH - for RF artillery activity)
• Eastern Ukraine (General): RF sources provide drone footage of 14th Guards Spetsnaz Brigade operators destroying "armament and material means of the enemy," including dugouts and machine gun crews, in the area of responsibility of the 5th Army Group "Vostok." RF sources also claim FPV drone brigades are controlling both ground and air. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for activity; MEDIUM for claimed effectiveness)
• Eastern Ukraine (Chasiv Yar/Konstantinovka): TASS military expert claims Kyiv has withdrawn UA forces from Chasiv Yar to Konstantinovka and is building defenses. Colonelcassad reports the UA 4th Separate Tank Brigade (A7015) has been re-formed into a heavy mechanized brigade. (CONFIDENCE: LOW - for validity of Chasiv Yar claim, high for RF narrative; MEDIUM for 4th Tank Brigade re-formation - requires independent verification)
• RF Territory (Multiple Oblasts & Black Sea): RF MoD claims 41 Ukrainian UAVs were destroyed over various regions of RF and the Black Sea. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for UA drone activity; MEDIUM for RF claim of destruction rate) Multiple explosions and air alerts reported in Voronezh, attributed to unknown drones. Geolocation efforts confirm footage from one residential complex. RF Governor confirms approximately 15 UAVs destroyed over Voronezh and three districts, with the number of injured increasing to 4 (TASS). ASTRA reports 4 injured in Voronezh. Additional reports confirm a private residential house burned down in Voronezh following a UAV attack. Video footage from RF sources (Операция Z) with "Zhest Voronezh" watermark further confirms explosions/fire. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Sochi Airport had temporary restrictions which have now been lifted. "Операция Z" is reporting "Enemy attacks Sochi". Explosions and fires reported in Sochi, with sirens active. RF claims Sochi/Adler air defenses are successfully repelling a "strongest UAV attack" for over an hour. A fire is reported in Kstovo, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, RF. ASTRA reports fire in Adler after UAV attack near a local oil refinery (NPP). ASTRA shares more video of explosions and sirens in Sochi, including evacuation of passengers to bomb shelters at Sochi airport with complaints of lack of water. RF sources report a fuel reservoir fire at an oil depot in Sochi after a UAV attack. Pskov Airport has temporarily suspended operations for security reasons. ASTRA reports 127 personnel and 35 units of equipment are extinguishing a fire at an oil depot in Adler; a store is also burning. Bryansk Oblast Governor reports two UAVs destroyed over Bryansk Oblast by RF MoD air defense. ASTRA provides additional video confirming large fire at Rosneft-Kubannefteprodukt oil depot in Adler after UAV attack. Colonelcassad reports one tank burning at the Adler oil depot and garages damaged by a downed drone after a large UAV attack. ASTRA provides video of moment of UAV attack on oil depot near Adler airport. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF Territory (Jewish Autonomous Oblast): TASS reports derailment of tank cars and leakage of ship fuel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - for event occurrence, LOW - for combat-related cause)
• Central Ukraine (Kyiv): Air raid alert declared in Kyiv due to ballistic missile threat, with a missile confirmed on a course towards Kyiv. Explosions heard, with RF sources confirming a ballistic missile strike. Kyiv city military administration confirmed a missile attack. Air raid alert cleared. A new ballistic missile threat was declared from the South, which has now been cleared. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Central Ukraine (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast): UA Air Force reports group of UAVs past Pavlohrad heading towards Dnipro. RBC-Ukraine confirms this drone movement. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Central Ukraine (Zhytomyr Oblast): UA Air Force reports groups of UAVs moving past Malin and Radomyshl, then into Khmelnytskyi Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Northeastern Ukraine (Sumy Oblast): UA Air Force reports new groups of attack UAVs entering via Sumy Oblast. These UAVs are then reported moving from Sumy Oblast to Poltava Oblast (Hadiach, Komyshnia, Myrhorod) and Cherkasy Oblast (Smila, Drabiv, Cherkasy). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) NEW intelligence from TASS claims that "more than 10 servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine disappear daily in Yunakovka, Sumy Oblast." This RF claim suggests sustained cross-border activity in Sumy region and potential RF pressure tactics. (CONFIDENCE: LOW - for validity of claim, HIGH - for RF narrative intent)
• Northern Ukraine (Chernihiv Oblast): UA Air Force reports group of UAVs in northern Chernihiv Oblast, course towards Slavutych. These UAVs continue movement from Chernihiv Oblast to Kyiv Oblast, past Ivankiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF Occupied Territories (Southern Donetsk Oblast): RF sources (Colonelcassad) claim 29th Army Group "Vostok" is advancing towards Iskra, a settlement bordering Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, dropping leaflets on enemy positions. (CONFIDENCE: LOW - for claimed advance, HIGH - for leaflet drop and RF intent)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• No new significant weather or environmental factors reported. Conditions remain generally conducive to continued ground and air operations, with night operations observed for drone attacks and missile strikes. The fire at the Adler oil depot is an environmental consequence of military action. The fuel leak in Jewish Autonomous Oblast is an environmental incident. NEW video from Colonelcassad shows multiple locations in a city engulfed in flames with significant smoke plumes, indicating widespread destruction likely from recent military activity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RF Forces:
  • Air Assets: Continued extensive use of UAVs (Shaheds, Geran-2) across multiple axes (Kharkiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia, Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, Khmelnytskyi) and deep into RF territory (Voronezh, Sochi, Kstovo, Adler, Pskov, Bryansk). RF claims effective interception of UA UAVs (41 overall, 15 over Voronezh, 2 over Bryansk). Ballistic missile threat on Kyiv indicates continued use of high-value strike assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) RF sources are explicitly calling for additional FAB strikes on the damaged Kherson bridge to collapse it. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground Assets: Active offensive operations continue on the Pokrovsk direction. Artillery (305th Arty Bde, 20th Army's Msta-S) remains active in Zaporizhzhia Oblast and other fronts. Spetsnaz units (14th Guards) are conducting localized strikes. Elements of 76th Guards VDV confirmed west of Verbove. RF FPV drone units (Brigade "Undeafeatable") are increasingly active. RF claims consolidation in Temirovka. RF 29th Army Group "Vostok" claims advance towards Iskra. RF sources claim UA forces pulled from Chasiv Yar to Konstantinovka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for activity; MEDIUM for effectiveness claims; LOW for Chasiv Yar claim)
  • Information Operations: RF channels continue to disseminate claims of successful strikes, project military prowess, and engage in nationalistic propaganda, attempting to redefine "healthy nationalism." Claims of control over Hoptivka checkpoint. RF acknowledges UA drone attacks on RF territory (Voronezh, Sochi, Adler), attributing them to "enemy attack." Colonelcassad explicitly mentions a large UAV attack on Adler with damage to an oil depot tank and garages, and openly calls for additional FAB strikes on the Kherson bridge to collapse it. RF promotes military advances on the Southern-Donetsk direction and deflects from UA activity. RF promotes the narrative of UA withdrawal from Chasiv Yar. RF state media (TASS) covers domestic economic issues, internal security (Crocus City Hall investigation), and promotes patriotic "folk talents." NEW from TASS: Claims that "more than 10 servicemen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine disappear daily in Yunakovka, Sumy Oblast," which is likely a psychological operation aimed at demoralizing UA forces or justifying future RF cross-border actions. TASS also features a video of a captured UA serviceman discussing recruitment in Cherkasy for "assault units," an attempt to discredit UA mobilization efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• UA Forces:
  • Air Defense: Active air defense response to incoming UAVs (Kharkiv, Bryansk - per RF reports) and ballistic threats (Kyiv). UA Air Force reporting on Shahed movements across Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Sumy, Poltava, Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, and Khmelnytskyi Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Long-Range Strike: Demonstrated capability to conduct widespread UAV strikes across a wide range of Russian territory and the Black Sea (Voronezh, Sochi, Adler, Pskov, potentially Kstovo, Bryansk), forcing RF air defense responses and leading to airport restrictions. Confirmed fire at a fuel reservoir on a Sochi oil depot with significant fire response. ASTRA provides video of the attack moment. Colonelcassad confirms damage to one tank and garages in Adler. NEW ASTRA video confirms "second hit" at the garage cooperative near the Adler oil depot. This indicates sustained and precise UA targeting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground Forces: Engaged in close-quarters combat on the Pokrovsk direction and other Eastern sectors. Special Operations Forces (GUR) actively engaged. Development of improvised "IED" FPV motorcycles. Engaged in attacks in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, according to RF sources. RF sources claim UA 4th Tank Brigade re-formed into heavy mechanized brigade. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Infrastructure Response: UA authorities are actively responding to air threats and managing infrastructure damage and civilian evacuations (Kherson, Mykolaiv, Chuhuiv, Kharkiv, Balakliia). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Control Measures:
  • Ukraine: UA authorities are actively responding to air threats, managing infrastructure damage, and initiating civilian evacuations (Kherson). Dissemination of information regarding deep strikes into RF territory suggests deliberate psychological operations. Implementation of air alerts in Kyiv and other oblasts. UA Air Force is actively tracking and reporting on Shahed movements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Russia: Issuance of air alerts in numerous oblasts (Voronezh, Sochi, Pskov, Bryansk) and claims of mass UAV destruction by MoD and Governor suggests reactive control measures to UA deep strikes, including temporary airport restrictions (Sochi, Pskov) and passenger evacuation. Active reporting on artillery effectiveness. Coordinated air defense response and reporting for Sochi/Adler. Large-scale fire response to Adler oil depot confirmed by RF. NEW: Voronezh governor has lifted the "yellow level" threat (Igor Artamonov), indicating a perceived return to stability after drone attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities:
  • UAVs/Missiles: RF maintains a robust and adaptable UAV program (Shaheds, Geran-2) and continues to employ high-speed missiles (Kh-22, FAB-500 glide bombs) and ballistic missiles. RF also demonstrates a capability to detect and interdict a significant number of incoming UA UAVs, though UA strikes on Voronezh, Sochi, Adler (confirmed oil depot fire), and Pskov indicate continued vulnerability. New UAV axes via Sumy Oblast into Poltava/Cherkasy, northern Chernihiv Oblast now into Kyiv Oblast, and newly observed activity in Zhytomyr/Khmelnytskyi Oblasts. RF air assets are now explicitly targeting damaged Ukrainian infrastructure, notably the Kherson bridge, with the stated intent of collapsing it via additional FAB strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Artillery & SOF/FPV: RF continues to employ conventional artillery for suppressive fires and targeting of UA tactical positions. RF Spetsnaz units (14th Guards) are actively engaged in localized precision strikes, with a notable shift towards drone-centric tactics. Emerging RF FPV drone brigades are claiming significant tactical control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground Offensive: RF is capable of mounting large-scale ground assaults (Avdiivka/Pokrovsk direction), utilizing extensive air and artillery preparation. Deployment of VDV elements near Verbove indicates commitment of high-value units. RF claims consolidation in Temirovka. RF 29th Army Group "Vostok" claims advance towards Iskra. RF sources claim UA forces pulled from Chasiv Yar to Konstantinovka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for activity; LOW for Chasiv Yar claim)
  • Deep Strike Resilience: RF territories remain vulnerable to Ukrainian long-range strikes/UAVs, necessitating air alerts across numerous oblasts, resulting in visible damage and airport closures. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare: RF media continues to produce and disseminate sophisticated pro-military and anti-Ukrainian narratives, including glorification of forces, claims of successful targeting, re-defining "nationalism," and unsubstantiated claims of territorial control and UA withdrawals. They also highlight perceived external threats and showcase foreign military technology. RF narratives also include detailed information on domestic security matters and broader non-military domestic issues. Recent claims of UA daily losses in Yunakovka and videos of captured UA servicemen discussing recruitment tactics are part of this broader IO effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Military Objectives: RF intends to continue degrading Ukrainian critical infrastructure and military logistics. They seek to maintain offensive pressure on key axes while solidifying defensive lines. Continued focus on suppressing UA deep strike capabilities. RF's continued military activity near the ZNPP indicates a willingness to operate in proximity to high-risk civilian infrastructure. Sustained attacks on Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia indicate an intent to disrupt port infrastructure, civilian morale, and defense industry. Targeting Kyiv with ballistic missiles indicates intent to strike command and control or symbolic targets. RF intends to continue pressure on UA air defenses through diversified drone strike axes. RF intends to exploit perceived UA weaknesses or withdrawals. The explicit call for additional FAB strikes on the Kherson bridge confirms an intent to completely sever this logistical artery. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Objectives: RF aims to project overwhelming military success, demoralize Ukrainian forces and population, and bolster domestic support. They also seek to deflect from Ukrainian successes and maintain a coherent nationalistic narrative. RF is attempting to divert attention from UA deep strikes by promoting internal news, and actively attempting to demoralize UA forces and civilians through claims of losses and difficulties in mobilization. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Elevated Bridge Damage & Intent to Collapse: Severe damage to the Kherson bridge, leading to evacuation orders and gas supply disruption, indicates a significant impact on southern logistics. NEW intelligence indicates multiple additional impacts on the bridge and an explicit RF intent to collapse it with further FAB strikes. This is a critical development. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Continued ZNPP Proximity: IAEA report of explosions near ZNPP highlights continued operational disregard for critical nuclear infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Focused Air/Artillery Preparations: Surge in FAB-500 glide bomb strikes and coordinated artillery barrages on the Avdiivka axis signifies systematic aerial preparation for large-scale ground assaults. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• VDV Deployment to Zaporizhzhia: Confirmed presence of 76th VDV elements near Verbove represents a commitment of high-value units to the Zaporizhzhia front. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Expanded Drone Strikes & New Axes: Confirmed use of Geran-2 type UAVs on Kharkiv, Chuhuiv, and Balakliia indicates a continued, diversified air threat, including civilian targets. New Shahed movement from Kharkiv to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast and new groups via Sumy Oblast moving towards Poltava and Cherkasy Oblasts. New UAV activity in northern Chernihiv Oblast now into Kyiv Oblast, and newly observed Zhytomyr/Khmelnytskyi Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• UA Deep Strikes into RF Territory & Airport/Industrial Disruption: Multiple explosions and air alerts in Voronezh, Sochi, Adler, Pskov, and Bryansk due to alleged drone attacks highlight continued Ukrainian capability to conduct deep strikes, pressing RF air defense and forcing airport restrictions. Confirmed fire at a fuel reservoir on a Sochi oil depot with significant fire response. The sustained nature of the UA UAV attack on Sochi/Adler over an hour indicates a concentrated effort. NEW ASTRA video confirms "second hit" at Adler garage cooperative, indicating continued UA targeting precision and persistence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ballistic Missile Threat to Kyiv: Immediate air alert and confirmation of a ballistic missile on course for Kyiv, followed by explosions, signifies continued RF intent and capability to strike high-value targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF FPV Drone Development: Promotion of RF "FPV brigades" ("Undeafeatable") suggests increased investment and tactical integration. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - emerging capability gaining traction)
• RF Consolidation in Zaporizhzhia: RF claims of consolidating positions in Temirovka suggest a focus on defensive hardening. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• RF Claim of Advance in Southern-Donetsk: RF claim of 29th Army advance towards Iskra signifies their intent to pressure this sector. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for actual advance; HIGH for intent/activity)
• RF Claim of UA Withdrawal from Chasiv Yar: RF claims Kyiv has withdrawn UA forces from Chasiv Yar to Konstantinovka. (CONFIDENCE: LOW - for validity of claim; HIGH - for RF intelligence assessment and narrative)
• UA 4th Tank Brigade Re-formation: Colonelcassad reports UA 4th Tank Brigade reformed into a heavy mechanized brigade, suggesting an adaptation in force structure. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• RF Information Operations on UA Casualties/Mobilization: RF claims of daily UA losses in Sumy Oblast and video of a captured UA serviceman discussing recruitment tactics in Cherkasy indicate a tactical shift in psychological operations aimed at undermining UA morale and public trust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - for IO intent)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• RF continues to execute air and missile campaigns, implying sufficient access to fuel and munitions. Artillery activity suggests continued shell supply. The confirmed fire at a Sochi oil depot from a UAV strike indicates a direct impact on RF fuel logistics, though the reported scale ("one barrel") suggests limited immediate disruption. Significant fire response in Adler indicates a major logistical and resource commitment.
• Persistent difficulties in maintaining civilian infrastructure and services in occupied territories (water supply issues in Donetsk/Makeevka) could indirectly impact military support. Passengers at Sochi airport complaining about lack of water indicate localized logistical strain. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Temporary restrictions at Sochi Airport were lifted, but new restrictions at Pskov Airport cause localized logistical disruptions. The derailment in Jewish Autonomous Oblast highlights vulnerabilities in RF transport infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• RF C2 appears effective in coordinating multi-domain strikes and maintaining offensive pressure. Rapid claim of mass UAV destruction by MoD and Governor suggests a centralized and responsive reporting system. Sustained AD response in Sochi/Adler, including passenger evacuation and large-scale fire response, indicates effective local C2. The lifting of the "yellow level" threat in Voronezh suggests RF C2 is attempting to restore normalcy and maintain public calm following drone attacks.
• Integration of information operations with military claims and diplomatic messaging suggests continued synchronization. Coordination of ballistic missile strikes with drone attacks suggests continued strategic planning. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Ukrainian forces demonstrate high readiness in air defense, identifying and tracking UAVs and reacting to missile strikes across multiple oblasts, including new movements into Khmelnytskyi. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• UA Special Operations Forces (GUR) and regular infantry are actively engaged and effective in countering localized RF advances. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• UA authorities are effective in crisis management, rapid infrastructure repair (Kherson power restoration from previous report), civilian evacuation, and emergency response to missile strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian long-range strike capabilities are demonstrated by widespread drone activity deep within RF territory and the Black Sea (Voronezh, Sochi, Adler, Pskov, Bryansk). The sustained attack on Sochi/Adler, causing a fuel reservoir fire at an oil depot and a "second hit" on a garage cooperative, is a notable tactical success. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Innovation in improvised weapon systems (IED FPV motorcycle) suggests adaptation and resourcefulness. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Ukrainian forces on the Avdiivka axis are under severe pressure from intense aerial and artillery preparation, highlighting a critical need for air defense and counter-battery capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• UA forces are reportedly building defenses in Konstantinovka, implying a strategic decision to consolidate and hold ground, possibly after a tactical withdrawal from Chasiv Yar (per RF claim). The re-formation of the 4th Tank Brigade into a heavy mechanized brigade suggests adaptation. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for confirmed withdrawal, but HIGH for UA intent to build defenses in Konstantinovka; MEDIUM for brigade re-formation)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • Continued ability to conduct deep strikes into RF territory and the Black Sea (Voronezh, Sochi, Adler, Pskov, Bryansk), forcing widespread air alerts, causing visible damage, airport restrictions, and successfully striking a fuel reservoir at a Sochi oil depot with a large-scale fire and a "second hit" on a garage cooperative. The sustained nature of the UAV attack on Sochi is a notable tactical success. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Effective counter to RF advances by GUR in Zelenyy Hay (previous report). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Tactical success in close-quarters combat on the Pokrovsk direction (previous report). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Successful air defense against incoming UAVs and response to ballistic missile threat in Kyiv. Active tracking of Shahed groups across various axes, including the newly identified threat to Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, and Khmelnytskyi Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Setbacks:
  • The severe damage to the Kherson bridge, and the RF's explicit intent to collapse it, will significantly complicate logistical operations in Southern Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Missile strikes in Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, Chuhuiv, and Balakliia caused significant damage to civilian infrastructure and resulted in casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Persistent and diversified RF UAV and missile attacks continue to stress Ukrainian air defenses and threaten civilian infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Continued combat operations near the ZNPP pose an inherent risk of a catastrophic incident. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ukrainian forces on the Avdiivka axis are facing a significant pre-assault bombardment, indicating a high risk of operational envelopment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • RF claims of consolidating positions in Temirovka suggest that UA offensive efforts are meeting stiffening resistance. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • RF claims of advancing towards Iskra, if true, represent a setback for UA defensive lines. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for confirmed setback; MEDIUM for potential setback if advance is verified)
  • RF claim of UA withdrawal from Chasiv Yar, if verified, would represent a significant tactical setback. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for confirmed setback given source bias)
  • RF information operations regarding daily UA losses in Yunakovka, Sumy Oblast, and videos of captured servicemen are designed to create a perception of setback and demoralization, requiring a robust UA counter-narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for IO impact, LOW for factual basis of RF claims)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Critical Need: Enhanced air defense capabilities to counter high-speed missiles (Kh-22, ballistic) and the evolving, diversified drone threat across all regions. Immediate reinforcement of SHORAD in the Avdiivka sector.
• Repair & Resilience: Urgent demand for resources and expertise for rapid repair of critical infrastructure (Kherson bridge, Mykolaiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia, Kharkiv) and continued maintenance of civilian services. The explicit RF intent to collapse the Kherson bridge means additional resources will be needed for emergency bridging solutions and robust alternative supply routes.
• Frontline Support: Continued need for tactical UAVs, counter-UAV systems, and robust medical/evacuation support for forces engaged in active defense. Counter-battery fire capabilities must be enhanced against RF artillery and TOS.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Objectives: RF channels are promoting: claims of successful strikes, narratives supporting internal stability and military prowess (e.g., "healthy nationalism," Crocus City Hall investigation, domestic social issues, patriotic "folk talents"), discrediting Ukrainian information operations, claims of controlling Ukrainian territory (Hoptivka, Temirovka, Iskra), highlighting RF FPV drone capabilities, acknowledging and visually confirming "enemy attacks" on RF territory while downplaying extent, promoting artillery effectiveness, highlighting US Space Force/UAVs and Chinese military technology, and claiming Ukrainian withdrawal from Chasiv Yar. NEW: RF sources (Colonelcassad) are openly calling for the complete destruction of the Kherson bridge, signaling a clear information objective to highlight UA logistical vulnerabilities. TASS claims daily UA losses in Yunakovka, Sumy Oblast, and features a captured UA serviceman discussing recruitment in Cherkasy, aimed at demoralizing UA forces and public perception of mobilization. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• UA Objectives: UA channels are focusing on: reporting RF aggression and consequences of strikes (Kherson bridge, Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia, Kyiv, Voronezh, Sochi, Adler, Pskov, Bryansk), highlighting Ukrainian military successes (deep strike, GUR action), countering RF claims, emphasizing continued threats (Shahed/ballistic missile movements, new axes), highlighting internal RF issues (water shortages, rail incident), and reporting on diplomatic developments (British FM's assessment of Putin's intentions). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukrainian Public: Morale likely fluctuating; boosted by deep strikes into RF territory (Sochi oil depot fire, Pskov airport closure) but maintained anxiety from ongoing missile/drone threats and infrastructure damage (Kherson bridge, particularly with the explicit RF intent to collapse it). Evacuation orders in Kherson directly impact civilian life. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for impact)
• Russian Public: Pro-military sentiment continuously reinforced. Attempts to redefine "healthy nationalism" manage social discourse. Claims of successful UAV interdiction aim to reassure, though confirmed explosions in Voronezh, Sochi, Adler, Pskov will likely cause concern. Colonelcassad's direct report on damage in Adler indicates unavoidable transparency. Claims of territorial gains and UA withdrawals designed to boost morale. Reports of internal social issues downplayed by state media but acknowledged to project responsiveness. Public reaction to temporary airport closures and drone attacks in resort cities like Sochi and Adler, particularly sustained attacks and industrial fires, will be monitored for shifts in sentiment. The lifting of the "yellow level" threat in Voronezh aims to restore public confidence. RF claims of UA losses and recruitment difficulties are designed to boost domestic morale by portraying UA as weakening. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for propaganda impact, MEDIUM for public sentiment impact of drone attacks)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• US officials continue to articulate a strategy of "pressure on Russia" through arming NATO allies and Kyiv (US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker). Russian officials (Leonid Slutsky) dismiss US attempts to pressure Russia via China and India. British Foreign Minister David Lammy indicates Putin is not ready for serious peace talks, due to "maximalist ambitions". TASS reports on Beslan Mayor participating in Bologna terror attack commemoration. RF channels' interest in US Space Force/UAVs and showcasing Chinese "FeiLong-60A" could be a precursor to narratives regarding wider strategic competition. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

• Sustained and Intensified Infrastructure/Logistics Degradation, including Kherson Bridge Collapse: RF will persist in using a mix of Kh-22 missiles, ballistic missiles (including new threats from the South to Kyiv), FABs, and UAVs (including Geran-2, Shaheds on new axes like Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, Khmelnytskyi, and continued deep strikes on RF territory including Bryansk) to target critical infrastructure, especially energy facilities, transportation nodes. Explicit RF intent and targeting indicate a high likelihood of continued FAB strikes on the Kherson bridge aiming to achieve its complete collapse. Expect continued systematic targeting of civilian areas in cities like Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Imminent Large-Scale Ground Assault on Avdiivka/Pokrovsk Direction: RF will launch a multi-pronged ground assault aimed at the operational envelopment of Avdiivka, likely initiating within the next 24-48 hours. Main thrusts expected from the north (Krasnohorivka) and south (Opytne/Vodyane), following intense preparatory air (FAB-500) and artillery barrages. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Continued Pressure and Defensive Hardening in Zaporizhzhia and Southern-Donetsk: RF will leverage elements of the 76th VDV near Verbove to solidify defensive lines, halt further Ukrainian advances towards Tokmak, and potentially conduct localized spoiling attacks. Increasing use of RF FPV drones and a shift towards drone-centric ground tactics will be integrated into these defensive and counter-attack operations, alongside consolidation efforts in areas like Temirovka. RF 29th Army will continue attempts to advance towards Iskra. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Expanded Cross-Border Information Operations & Localized Probes (Sumy Direction): RF will likely increase information operations targeting UA morale and mobilization efforts, particularly in regions like Sumy Oblast, possibly accompanied by localized cross-border probing actions by small groups to gather intelligence, harass, or support the narrative of UA losses. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Exploitation of Perceived UA Withdrawals/Weaknesses: RF will likely attempt to exploit any perceived or actual UA withdrawals (e.g., Chasiv Yar, if confirmed) by increasing ground pressure or probing attacks. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Escalated Information Operations & Diplomatic Maneuvering: RF will continue to leverage BDA claims, narrative control (including false territorial claims like Hoptivka, Temirovka, Iskra, and claimed UA withdrawals from Chasiv Yar), and nationalistic messaging to project strength, undermine Ukrainian resolve, and influence international opinion. They will attempt to frame international support for Ukraine as coercion and redefine national identity. Diplomatic efforts and highlighting perceived external threats will continue. RF will also attempt to normalize internal drone attacks and use unrelated domestic news to distract. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Persistent Threat to ZNPP: Given continued RF operations near ZNPP, RF will likely continue to operate in a manner that poses inherent risk to the plant. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

• Coordinated Breakthrough and Encirclement on the Avdiivka Axis: The RF could achieve a significant, rapid breakthrough on the Avdiivka/Pokrovsk axis, leveraging overwhelming air and artillery support and follow-on ground forces to operationally encircle or severely isolate Ukrainian defenders. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH, based on previous daily report)
• Successful Collapse of Kherson Bridge: RF could successfully collapse the Kherson bridge, leading to severe, prolonged logistical disruption in Southern Ukraine and potentially forcing significant changes to UA operational planning in the sector. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - due to persistent targeting; HIGH - if RF commits sufficient munitions)
• Escalated Cross-Border Activity into Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv/Kyiv/Zhytomyr Oblasts with Diversionary Ground Incursions: RF could leverage forces potentially preparing or sustained for the "Sumy direction" or other border concentrations to launch a limited but well-supported cross-border ground incursion, aimed at creating a diversion, disrupting logistics, or establishing a small bridgehead. This could be accompanied by intense UAV swarms and sabotage teams. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - with the new information on RF claims of UA losses in Sumy, this indicates a possible precursor for future operations)
• Deliberate Strike on ZNPP Infrastructure: RF could intentionally target non-critical but impactful infrastructure at or immediately adjacent to the ZNPP to create a manufactured crisis, exert immense international pressure, or disrupt Ukrainian energy supply, while seeking to blame Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: LOW - due to high international blowback; MEDIUM - if RF perceives overwhelming strategic advantage or desperation)
• Sustained Ballistic Missile Campaign against Kyiv/Major Cities: RF could launch a concentrated and sustained ballistic missile campaign against Kyiv or other major urban centers, aiming to overwhelm air defenses, cause widespread civilian casualties, and force political concessions. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Expanded UAV Campaign with Massed Swarms targeting Critical Infrastructure: RF could deploy significantly larger and more coordinated UAV swarms from multiple axes specifically designed to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses, enabling more successful strikes on critical energy infrastructure or military industrial complexes deeper into UA airspace. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Immediate (0-24 hours): CRITICAL PERIOD for the Avdiivka/Pokrovsk axis, with RF ground assault highly probable. Expect further RF missile and UAV strikes on energy, logistics, and civilian targets, with high probability of continued targeting of the Kherson bridge. UA will need to rapidly assess Mykolaiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia, and Kharkiv damage and manage civilian evacuation from Kherson. Decision Point: Prioritize allocation of mobile air defense systems to Avdiivka/Pokrovsk and other high-threat urban centers, including Kyiv for ballistic missile defense. Reassess and reinforce logistics routes in Southern Ukraine, planning for complete loss of Kherson bridge. Deploy QRFs to respond to Avdiivka breakthroughs. Track Shahed movements to Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, and Khmelnytskyi Oblasts from new axes. Verify RF claim of UA withdrawal from Chasiv Yar and assess implications. Counter RF information operations regarding Yunakovka and Cherkasy recruitment.
• Short-Term (24-72 hours): RF will likely attempt to consolidate any gains on the Eastern front (e.g., Avdiivka, Temirovka, Iskra). Expect increased UAV activity from diversified launch points into UA territory and continued UA deep strikes into RF territory. The outcome and interpretation of the British Foreign Minister's statements will continue to emerge. Decision Point: Evaluate the effectiveness of current counter-UAV measures against diversified drone threats and the growing RF FPV drone capability. Consider tactical redeployments based on the evolving situation on the Eastern front and the pressure on Avdiivka. Implement alternative logistics plans in the South, potentially including emergency bridging. Reassess air defense coverage for new drone corridors.
• Mid-Term (72+ hours): RF will continue attrition warfare and attempt to exploit any weaknesses created by infrastructure damage or frontline pressure. Ukraine will need to demonstrate sustained adaptive defense and resourcefulness. Decision Point: Review and adjust long-term air defense strategies based on observed RF strike patterns and capabilities. Prepare for potential shifts in international diplomatic discourse. Prioritize sustained procurement and repair of critical military and civilian assets. Monitor for any escalation or direct threats to the ZNPP.

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Air Defense & Counter-Air (PRIORITY 1):
  • Immediately reinforce the Avdiivka/Pokrovsk sector with additional mobile air defense systems (SHORAD) to counter the heavy FAB-500 glide bomb and TOS threats.
  • Maintain heightened vigilance and readiness of air defense assets across Kharkiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia, Mykolaiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, and Khmelnytskyi Oblasts against diversified Shahed, Geran-2, missile (Kh-22), and ballistic threats. Actively track and respond to Shahed groups entering Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, Cherkasy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, and Khmelnytskyi Oblasts from newly identified axes.
  • Continue to task long-range ISR and strike assets to identify and neutralize RF tactical aviation (Su-34/35) launch platforms, TOS positions, and UAV control infrastructure.
  • Enhance EW capabilities to jam and disrupt RF drone operations, especially FPV drone systems. Develop countermeasures specifically against observed drone-centric tactics of RF ground units.
• Logistics & Infrastructure Resilience (PRIORITY 1):
  • Conduct immediate and thorough BDA on the Kherson bridge. Prepare for its complete collapse given explicit RF targeting intent. Activate all alternative logistics routes for Southern forces, prioritizing resupply. Establish emergency resupply hubs and assess feasibility of temporary bridging solutions.
  • Rapidly complete BDA on the Mykolaiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia, Kharkiv, Adler/Sochi (oil refinery/depot fuel reservoir), Pskov (airport), and Bryansk strikes. Conduct similar assessments for any Kyiv impacts.
  • Accelerate deployment of mobile repair teams and pre-positioned critical materials for energy and transportation infrastructure across high-risk regions. Address reported water infrastructure issues.
  • Provide immediate support for the evacuation of Korabelny district residents from Kherson.
• Eastern Front Reinforcement & Attrition (PRIORITY 1):
  • CRITICAL: Maintain and reinforce defensive lines on the Avdiivka/Pokrovsk axis, anticipating the MLCOA of a major RF ground assault. Pre-position quick reaction forces (QRFs).
  • Verify the RF claim of UA withdrawal from Chasiv Yar and prepare for potential RF exploitation. If confirmed, ensure defensive preparations in Konstantinovka are robust and timely.
  • Support GUR and other special operations forces with intelligence and resources to capitalize on tactical successes and to counter RF infiltration. Evaluate the effectiveness and potential proliferation of improvised FPV weaponry.
  • Intensify precision counter-battery fire against RF artillery and rocket systems, including TOS and Msta-S positions.
• Nuclear Safety (PRIORITY 1):
  • Maintain continuous monitoring of RF military activity in the vicinity of the ZNPP.
  • Coordinate with IAEA and international partners to highlight and condemn any military actions that endanger the ZNPP.
  • Develop contingency plans for immediate response to any further escalation or direct impact on ZNPP infrastructure.
• Information Operations (PRIORITY 2):
  • Proactively disseminate accurate and timely information on damage from strikes (Kherson bridge, Mykolaiv, Chuhuiv, Balakliia, Kharkiv, ZNPP explosions), emphasizing civilian impact and countering RF narratives. Publicly confirm and highlight successful UA deep strikes into RF territory (e.g., Voronezh, Sochi, Adler, Pskov, Bryansk), particularly the "second hit" on the Adler garage cooperative.
  • Amplify successes of Ukrainian forces (GUR action, deep strikes, tactical wins, innovative solutions).
  • Immediately counter false RF claims of territorial control and claimed UA withdrawals with verified ground truth. Address RF claims of FPV drone superiority. Proactively debunk RF claims of UA losses in Yunakovka, Sumy Oblast, and counter narratives from captured UA servicemen regarding recruitment difficulties.
  • Prepare and disseminate messaging regarding international diplomatic developments and British FM's assessment to shape expectations and counter potential RF disinformation.
• Intelligence Collection (PRIORITY 1):
  • CRITICAL: Confirm precise timing, main axes, and full unit involvement of the anticipated RF ground assault on Avdiivka/Pokrovsk. Identify composition and strength of follow-on forces and reserves.
  • CRITICAL: Obtain independent verification and detailed BDA on the Kherson bridge damage, assessing structural integrity and the likelihood of complete collapse with additional strikes.
  • CRITICAL: Verify exact nature and scale of RF ground forces in Sumy, Kharkiv, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, and Khmelnytskyi Oblast border areas, differentiating between active offensive units, defensive forces, and potential saboteur groups. Actively debunk or confirm claims like Hoptivka and Yunakovka.
  • Obtain detailed BDA on all recent strikes. Confirm cause and scale of Adler oil depot fire, reconciling UA/RF claims, particularly the impact of the "second hit."
  • Monitor and analyze RF military activity and changes in posture near ZNPP.
  • Monitor and analyze international diplomatic developments for shifts in stance or hidden agendas.
  • Monitor RF internal social and security issues for potential second-order effects on military readiness or public support, specifically focusing on public reaction to drone attacks in previously perceived safe areas and the impact of the "yellow level" threat lifting.
  • Assess capabilities and operational doctrine of newly highlighted RF FPV drone brigades.
  • Confirm launch location and precise type of ballistic missile used in Kyiv strikes.
  • Obtain BDA on RF claimed artillery effectiveness.
  • Conduct detailed analysis of UAV activity over Sochi, Adler, Pskov, and Bryansk. Confirm cause of fire in Kstovo, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast.
  • Monitor RF interest in foreign military technology (e.g., "FeiLong-60A").
  • Verify the re-formation and current status of UA 4th Tank Brigade.
  • Assess the true impact of RF psychological operations regarding UA losses in Yunakovka and recruitment in Cherkasy.

7. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• RF Ground Assault Details (Avdiivka/Pokrovsk): Precise start time, specific unit involvement, and confirmed main efforts.
• Kherson Bridge BDA & Logistics Impact: Independent, verified damage assessment, structural integrity, and full impact on UA logistics. Critical: probability of complete collapse.
• RF Force Posture (Sumy/Kharkiv/Chernihiv/Kyiv/Zhytomyr/Khmelnytskyi Directions): Confirmation of specific RF units, strength, and activities, with specific focus on claims like Hoptivka, Yunakovka, and UAV launch points.
• Full BDA All Recent Strikes: Independent, verified damage assessment of all Kh-22, UAV, and ballistic missile strikes, including the "second hit" in Adler.
• International Diplomatic Outcomes: Detailed information on discussions, deliverables, agreements, or disagreements from recent diplomatic engagements (e.g., British FM's statements) and their implications.
• RF Internal Social Cohesion: Further information on prevalence and impact of internal security issues on RF military and civilian morale, specifically concerning public reaction to drone attacks in previously perceived safe areas and the impact of RF information operations.
• Impact of RF Artillery/Spetsnaz/FPV Strikes: Independent BDA on effectiveness against Ukrainian positions and materiel, specifically combat effectiveness of drone-centric ground units.
• UA Improvised Weaponry (FPV Motorcycle): Assess proliferation, effectiveness, and tactical employment.
• Ballistic Missile Origin and Type (Kyiv): Confirm launch location and precise type for future air defense planning.
• RF Claims of Consolidation (Temirovka): Independent verification of RF consolidation and impact on UA offensive capabilities.
• RF Claims of Advance (Iskra): Independent verification of RF 29th Army's advance and tactical implications.
• UA Withdrawal from Chasiv Yar: Independent verification of RF claim and detailed assessment of current UA posture in Konstantinovka.
• Kstovo Fire Cause: Determine cause and combat linkage.
• FeiLong-60A Procurement/Replication: Indications of RF intent to procure or domestically replicate.
• UA 4th Tank Brigade Re-formation: Independent verification of reform and current status.
• Assessment of RF IO impact: How are RF claims about UA daily losses in Sumy and recruitment difficulties in Cherkasy being received by UA and international audiences?

---

END OF REPORT