Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 240137Z JUL 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Ukraine General: Persistent missile and UAV threat across Ukraine. Nationwide air raid alerts remain active. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Cherkasy Oblast: Multiple explosions reported in Cherkasy, following inbound missile trajectory from northern part of the oblast, course south/southeast. Air raid alert declared. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Kyiv Oblast: Air raid alert lifted. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Kharkiv Oblast: Threat of hostile Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) reported. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russia: Continued reporting of drone attacks in Krasnodar Krai (Sochi). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Krasnodar Krai (Sochi): New video evidence corroborates earlier reports of drone attack, showing significant aerial event with flashes and smoke over a city skyline. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Khabarovsk Krai: Law enforcement reporting of domestic incidents (teenager assault on elderly man) with photo and video messages. Not directly militarily relevant, but indicates internal focus for security forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• No new significant weather or environmental factors reported directly impacting operations within the past hour. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• UAF: Air defense (AD) remains on high alert nationwide, actively engaging and responding to missile and UAV threats. Public alerts and advisories are being issued rapidly. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RUF: Continues deep strike operations targeting Ukrainian territory with missiles. RF AD actively engaged in defending its territory against Ukrainian UAV attacks (Krasnodar Krai). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Moldova (Information Environment): TASS continues to publish interviews with former Moldovan President Igor Dodon, emphasizing opposition claims against current government. This indicates continued RF efforts to influence political narratives in neighboring countries. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities:
  • Persistent Deep Strike Capacity: RF continues to demonstrate the capability for rapid, widespread missile strikes, as evidenced by targets over Cherkasy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Adaptive Homeland Defense: RF maintains AD capabilities to repel UAV attacks on its territory, as demonstrated by the multi-sourced reporting and new visual evidence from Krasnodar Krai. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare: RF continues to leverage state media (TASS) to disseminate narratives undermining pro-Western governments in neighboring states. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Ukrainian Combat Potential and Civilian Morale: Continue high-volume missile and drone attacks to exhaust AD, disrupt logistics, and inflict civilian casualties, particularly targeting central Ukrainian regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Protect Domestic Infrastructure: RF will prioritize AD and counter-UAS measures to defend against Ukrainian long-range UAV attacks on its territory, especially after recent incidents in Krasnodar Krai. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Influence Regional Politics: Maintain efforts to shape political narratives in neighboring countries (e.g., Moldova) to align with RF interests and destabilize pro-Western governments. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Continued Rapid Missile Deployment: Missiles detected over northern Cherkasy Oblast with a southern/southeastern trajectory, indicating sustained dynamic targeting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Heightened Domestic Air Defense Engagement: Further visual evidence of drone attacks and AD responses in Krasnodar Krai confirms ongoing and adaptive defensive measures against Ukrainian long-range UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• Resource Allocation: No direct information on logistics status for missile or drone operations. However, persistent strikes suggest continued access to munitions. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Internal Security Focus: Arrests and investigations related to internal corruption (Timur Ivanov case, assets extended) by TASS suggest RF is managing internal stability issues, which indirectly affects resource allocation and elite cohesion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• Responsive Air Operations: The continued and precise nature of missile targeting against multiple Ukrainian oblasts indicates centralized and responsive C2 for RF aerial operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Domestic Security C2: The reported repulsion of drone attacks on Krasnodar Krai demonstrates effective local C2 and AD coordination within RF territory. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Air Defense (AD) Posture: Remains highly vigilant and engaged nationwide due to persistent missile and UAV threats. AD assets are actively tracking and engaging targets, as evidenced by rapid public reporting of explosions and intercepts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Civilian Alertness: Civilian populations are actively receiving and responding to air raid alerts, indicating established protocols and public awareness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • AD Engagements: Reports of "missiles minus" by informal sources (Mykolaiv Vanok) indicate successful UAF AD intercepts, though official confirmation is pending. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Setbacks:
  • Continued Missile Threat: Persistent missile danger across multiple key oblasts (Cherkasy, Kharkiv), requiring sustained AD effort and causing widespread civilian alerts and impacts (explosions in Cherkasy). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Vulnerability to UAVs: Kharkiv Oblast remains vulnerable to UAV attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Critical Needs: Continued and expedited supply of air defense systems and interceptor missiles remains paramount to counter persistent RF missile and UAV threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RF Propaganda: TASS continues to engage in information operations by promoting narratives favorable to Russia in neighboring countries (Moldova), accusing pro-Western governments of corruption/falsification. RF sources are also actively reporting on domestic AD engagements to project an image of security and control. Internal reporting on corruption cases like Timur Ivanov serves to project an image of rule of law. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Information: Ukrainian authorities continue to issue timely and accurate air raid alerts, demonstrating transparency and public safety efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF Internal Dissension (Propaganda Target): The personal testimony from Vasily Andreyev from the Luhansk region, expressing disillusionment and perceived lack of support from RF command, could be used by Ukraine for counter-propaganda purposes to target RF morale, or it could be part of an RF information operation to demonstrate internal "transparency" or shift blame. Further analysis required. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukraine: Public remains under constant stress due to persistent air raid alerts and missile threats, as evidenced by multiple explosions reported in Cherkasy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russia: Public in affected areas (Krasnodar Krai) experiences alarm due to drone attacks, as indicated by shared videos. Internal social issues (Habarovsk police reports) suggest localized civilian unrest or crime, which can indirectly impact morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• RF Military Personnel: Testimony from Vasily Andreyev suggests potential for low morale and disillusionment among RF military personnel, particularly those from occupied territories or "mobilized." (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• No new international support or diplomatic developments reported within the past hour. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

1. Sustained Deep Strike Campaign: RF will continue to launch high-speed missile and UAV targets at key Ukrainian oblasts (e.g., Cherkasy, Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia) to exhaust UAF AD resources and inflict damage on infrastructure and potentially military targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
   • INDICATORS: Continued air raid alerts across central, northern, and southern Ukraine; reports of explosions in urban centers; active AD engagements.
2. Increased Domestic Defense Measures: RF will maintain and likely enhance AD and counter-UAS measures in its border regions and deep within its territory, especially near critical infrastructure (e.g., Sochi/Krasnodar Krai). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
   • INDICATORS: Continued reports from RF sources of successful drone interceptions; public warnings in RF cities against filming AD activities; potential temporary flight restrictions.
3. Continued Information Operations: RF will maintain its efforts to destabilize neighboring countries via political narratives and continue to shape information within Russia to control public perception. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
   • INDICATORS: Continued TASS interviews with opposition figures in Moldova; state media reporting on domestic issues rather than direct conflict.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

1. Massed Ballistic/Cruise Missile Attack on Critical Infrastructure: RF could launch a highly coordinated and numerous ballistic/cruise missile attack targeting key energy infrastructure or transportation nodes across multiple Ukrainian oblasts simultaneously, aiming to overwhelm AD and cause widespread disruption. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
   • INDICATORS: Simultaneous detection of multiple missile types from various vectors; sustained waves of attacks over several hours; targeting of specific energy facilities or railway junctions.
2. Escalation of FAB-3000 Strikes in Kharkiv/Other Fronts: Following its initial deployment, RF could systematically employ FAB-3000 UMPK bombs against fortified Ukrainian positions, command centers, and strongpoints along critical axes (Kharkiv, Pokrovsk), aiming to rapidly degrade defenses and facilitate ground advances. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
   • INDICATORS: Repeat FAB-3000 strikes on different Ukrainian strongholds; increased RF tactical aviation sorties near the FLOT; reports of catastrophic damage to hardened positions.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Next 6-12 Hours (Until 240737Z JUL 25): High probability of continued missile and UAV threats across Ukraine, particularly in the central and northern regions. Expect active AD engagements. RF will likely maintain its AD posture against Ukrainian drone attacks on its territory. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Decision Point (UAF): Sustain AD readiness and maintain public alert systems. Prioritize allocation of mobile AD assets to areas under immediate threat (e.g., Cherkasy, Kharkiv).
• Next 24-48 Hours (Until 260137Z JUL 25): RF will likely continue to probe Ukrainian AD with missile and UAV attacks. Expect potential for further FAB-3000 deployments on Kharkiv axis. RF will continue its information operations targeting Ukraine's internal stability and neighboring countries. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Decision Point (UAF): Continue monitoring RF deep strike patterns and adapt AD deployment accordingly. Prepare for enhanced hardening and dispersal measures against large guided bombs. Intensify counter-information efforts to maintain public morale and cohesion.

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

1. Impact Assessment of FAB-3000:
   • Gap: Detailed post-strike analysis of the FAB-3000 impact in Lyptsi. This includes precise assessment of blast overpressure, cratering, and structural damage to determine its true effectiveness against hardened targets and optimal counter-measures.
   • Collection Requirements: IMINT/GEOINT of the strike location. SIGINT/OSINT from RF sources on internal assessments of the bomb's performance. TECHINT on bomb fragments/debris if available.
2. RF Missile Inventory and Production Rates:
   • Gap: Current inventory levels and ongoing production rates of ballistic and cruise missiles (e.g., Kh-series, Iskander) used in deep strikes, particularly those capable of high-speed trajectories.
   • Collection Requirements: SIGINT/ELINT on RF military-industrial complex communications. HUMINT on production facilities and supply chains. OSINT monitoring of state-owned defense enterprises.
3. Effectiveness of RF Internal Information Operations:
   • Gap: Quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of RF information operations targeting internal Russian morale (e.g., police reports, corruption cases) and external audiences (e.g., Moldovan political narratives).
   • Collection Requirements: OSINT analysis of social media sentiment within RF. HUMINT from sources within Moldova and other target countries regarding public and political reactions.

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize AD for Central Regions: Reallocate and reinforce AD assets, particularly mobile systems, to Cherkasy and other central oblasts currently under increased missile threat. Emphasize rapid response protocols for high-speed targets.
2. Counter-UAV Tasking for Kharkiv: Immediately task additional counter-UAV assets (e.g., EW systems, mobile AD teams with man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS)) to Kharkiv Oblast to counter reported drone threats.
3. Disseminate FAB-3000 Threat Analysis: Expedite the dissemination of the FAB-3000 M-54 threat assessment to all tactical units, emphasizing required changes to fortification, dispersal, and C2 node hardening protocols, especially on the Kharkiv and Pokrovsk Axes.
4. Information Warfare Counter-Narrative: Develop and deploy immediate counter-narratives to address RF propaganda targeting Moldovan politics, emphasizing democratic processes and exposing RF interference. Simultaneously, leverage available intelligence (e.g., soldier testimony) to target RF military and civilian morale.

---

// END OF REPORT //