INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)
1. SITUATION OVERVIEW
1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain
1.1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations
- Ukraine: European reports of temperatures up to +42°C suggest potential heat stress on personnel and equipment across Ukraine. Confidence: HIGH.
- Russia: Новости Москвы reports a North Atlantic cyclone "Cornelius" has arrived in Moscow, bringing 3 days of rain and colder temperatures. Confidence: HIGH.
1.1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures
2. ENEMY ANALYSIS
2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action
- Capabilities:
- Ground Offensive: Demonstrated capability for sustained high-intensity ground assaults, particularly along the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes, and in Chasiv Yar, utilizing combined arms tactics (infantry, armor, artillery, air support). Observed use of MT-LBs with infantry in assault, suggesting adaptation to high casualties among light assault groups.
- Air-Dropped Ordnance: Continued extensive use of FABs with UMPK glide kits, indicating robust tactical aviation support for ground operations.
- UAV Operations: Highly developed and integrated UAV capabilities for ISR, FPV strikes, and deep strikes (Shahed/Geranium). Reports of a new "Chernika" drone in Kharkiv. Deployment of a remote-controlled, tracked UGV with a dual machine gun mount on the Pokrovsk direction. Claimed increased production of Geranium drones suggests intent for wider deployment, potentially shifting to frontline tactical use. New drone footage from Odesa with "unusual" tail numbers on Geranium debris suggests potential new variants or tracking methods.
- EW: Sophisticated and widespread EW capabilities, significantly impacting UAF C2 and ISR.
- Precision Strikes: Demonstrated capability for long-range precision strikes against critical infrastructure and military targets across Ukraine, including industrial enterprises (Izhevsk, Zaporizhzhia), fuel depots (Luhansk, Odesa, Kremenchug, Drohobych), and military recruitment centers.
- Special Forces: Active Spetsnaz operations targeting UAF logistics and C2, as well as reconnaissance and appeals for donations.
- Intentions:
- Territorial Control: Primary intention remains the complete capture of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts, with a focus on Pokrovsk, Toretsk, and Chasiv Yar.
- Strategic Depth: Establishment of "buffer zones" in border regions (Sumy, Kharkiv) to reduce UAF cross-border attack capabilities.
- Infrastructure Degradation: Continued degradation of Ukraine's military-industrial complex, energy infrastructure, and logistics to undermine its war effort.
- Information Dominance: Maintain and escalate information warfare to shape narratives, demoralize UAF, and influence international opinion. Intensify efforts to demonize UAF, link them to terrorism, and sow discord within Ukraine's international partners.
- Internal Security: Continued efforts to suppress internal dissent and maintain control over occupied territories and the Russian population, including high-profile anti-corruption trials to project strength and accountability.
- Regional Influence: Assert dominance in post-Soviet space, actively countering perceived threats to its influence (e.g., Azerbaijan, Armenia).
- Courses of Action (COA) Observed:
- Pokrovsk/Toretsk Push: Continuous, high-intensity assaults with incremental gains.
- Chasiv Yar Consolidation: Focus on clearing and holding the Kanal microdistrict to prepare for further assaults across the canal.
- Deep Strike Campaign: Sustained missile and drone strikes against critical infrastructure and military-industrial targets.
- Border Probes & IO: Continued ground probes in Sumy/Kharkiv, coupled with intense information operations.
- Zaporizhzhia Buildup: Transfer of Kadyrovite units to Zaporizhzhia indicates a potential major ground offensive in the near term.
- South Caucasus IO: Intensified information and diplomatic pressure on Azerbaijan and Armenia in response to perceived anti-Russian actions.
2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations
- Frontline Drone Use: Claimed increase in "Geranium" (Shahed) production possibly leading to their direct deployment on the front lines, shifting from purely deep strikes to tactical support. This needs further verification but suggests a significant tactical evolution if true. New debris with unusual tail numbers supports ongoing development/modifications.
- UGV Deployment: Observed deployment of a remote-controlled, tracked UGV with a dual machine gun mount in Pokrovsk direction. This indicates initial attempts to integrate ground robotics into assault operations.
- Targeting Shifts: While critical infrastructure remains a primary target, there's an increased focus on agricultural enterprises (Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia) and deeper military-industrial targets within Russia (Izhevsk).
- VDV Role in Urban Combat: Continued, and seemingly successful, direct involvement of VDV units in challenging urban environments like Chasiv Yar's Kanal microdistrict.
- Changed Assault Tactics: Observed use of MT-LBs with infantry in assaults, potentially a shift from light assault groups due to high casualties or an attempt to provide more protected mobility for infantry breakthroughs.
2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status
- Challenges: RUF channels continue to appeal for public fundraising for essential battlefield equipment (e.g., drones, thermal imagers), indicating persistent, albeit potentially localized, sustainment gaps or efforts to offload costs to the civilian population. The conviction of Timur Ivanov for corruption might also indicate systemic issues within the military's logistical and procurement processes, though the public messaging frames it as an anti-corruption success.
- Resilience: Despite challenges, RUF maintains the capability for high-intensity operations and long-range strikes, implying sufficient, though possibly strained, access to key munitions and fuel.
- Deep Logistics: Successful UAF re-blocking of a railway section in occupied Zaporizhzhia Oblast demonstrates the vulnerability of RUF deep logistics.
2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness
- Centralized Control: The coordinated massed missile/drone attacks and simultaneous offensive pushes across multiple axes indicate effective centralized C2.
- Adaptation to Losses: The alleged liquidation of Colonel Goryachkin, Chief of Staff of the 8th Guards Army, is a significant HVT loss. The impact on local C2 will need to be monitored. Past experience suggests RUF can quickly replace commanders but such losses can cause temporary disruptions.
- EW Impact: RUF EW capabilities continue to significantly degrade UAF C2 and ISR, highlighting RUF's advantage in this domain.
- Internal Purge: The high-profile conviction and sentencing of Timur Ivanov, former Deputy Minister of Defense, signals an ongoing internal purge within the Russian military and government. This may indicate efforts to combat corruption, consolidate power, or deflect blame for military shortcomings. While potentially disruptive to some RUF internal processes, it also projects an image of strong leadership and accountability to the domestic audience. The continued legal process against Major General Ivan Popov indicates sustained internal scrutiny. Confidence: HIGH.
3. FRIENDLY FORCES
3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness
- Defensive Resilience: UAF continues to demonstrate strong defensive capabilities, repelling numerous assaults, especially in Pokrovsk and against ground incursions into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. The tactical fighting withdrawal in Chasiv Yar indicates disciplined and organized defensive maneuvers. Oleksandr Vilkul's posts show UAF personnel, including the 77th Airmobile Brigade, continuing to operate, indicating sustained morale and readiness.
- AD Effectiveness: UAF AD remains largely effective against massed RUF air attacks, shooting down a high percentage of incoming threats (e.g., 4750 air targets destroyed in June, as per UAF AF). However, the sheer volume of attacks and deep penetration capabilities (e.g., Izhevsk, Odesa, Mykolaiv, Saratov) highlights persistent gaps.
- Long-Range Strike Capability: UAF continues to demonstrate a growing and effective long-range precision strike capability against high-value RUF targets deep within Russia and occupied territories, including military-industrial facilities (Izhevsk Kupol plant), airfields (Volgograd, Crimea), logistics (Zaporizhzhia railway), and energy infrastructure (Saratov refinery). The successful strike on a D-30 howitzer indicates continued counter-battery efforts.
- Training Adaptation: UAF is actively adapting training programs to address current threats, such as increasing basic training time and focusing on countering strike UAVs. Continued "Psychological obstacle course" training highlights ongoing efforts to improve combat readiness and psychological resilience.
- Counter-Intelligence Successes: The prosecution and conviction of a Russian agent in Kramatorsk for passing UAF position information indicates effective counter-intelligence efforts.
3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks
- Successes:
- Successful repelling of 41 assaults in Pokrovsk direction in 24 hours.
- Successful defense against ground incursions into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, with 9 RUF soldiers captured.
- Highly significant deep strike on Izhevsk Electromechanical Plant "Kupol" (producer of Tor/Osa AD systems), confirmed by SBU.
- Successful deep strikes on RUF airfields (Volgograd, Crimea), the "Vilamoura" shadow fleet tanker, and the Saratov oil refinery.
- Successful re-blocking of a key RUF logistics railway in occupied Zaporizhzhia Oblast.
- High rate of RUF air target neutralization by UAF AD (4750 targets in June). RBC-Ukraine confirms this figure.
- Alleged liquidation of Colonel Goryachkin, Chief of Staff of the 8th Guards Army, a significant HVT.
- Successful UAF FPV strikes against RUF motorcycle assault groups in Pokrovsk direction.
- Capture of a rare Russian Special Reconnaissance Knife, indicating successful UAF capture of enemy assets/personnel.
- Successful counter-battery strike on a RUF D-30 howitzer.
- Setbacks:
- RUF consolidation of a foothold in Chasiv Yar's Kanal microdistrict.
- Continued high civilian casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure from RUF strikes across Ukraine (Donetsk, Odesa, Mykolaiv, Cherkasy, Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv). Kharkiv experienced a record number of Russian air attacks in June 2025.
- Loss of two UAF Air Force pilots during AD operations.
- Persistent challenges with RUF EW degrading UAF ISR and C2.
- Public frustration over lack of civilian modular shelters in Kyiv.
- The crash of a Su-34 in Nizhny Novgorod Oblast, while a RUF setback, may increase RUF air activity elsewhere to compensate.
- Continued targeting of UAF temporary deployment points and armored vehicles, such as the destruction of an M113 APC in Kotlyarivka.
3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints
- Critical Need: Air Defense: Urgent requirement for additional Western air defense systems, especially mobile short-to-medium range systems, to cover critical infrastructure and frontline gaps.
- Counter-EW: Enhanced capabilities to counter sophisticated RUF EW systems are vital for effective ISR and C2.
- Ammunition: Continued and increased supply of artillery ammunition remains crucial for sustained defensive and offensive operations. Poland's fivefold increase in production is a positive sign.
- Manpower: Adaptation of training and ongoing mobilization efforts indicate continued need for personnel.
- Civilian Protection Infrastructure: Urgent need for construction and deployment of modular shelters, especially in Kyiv, to protect the civilian population from ongoing RUF strikes.
- Financial Support: Public fundraising continues for specific equipment, indicating ongoing resource constraints despite international aid. Шеф Hayabusa's post about a large donation for the 28th Brigade highlights the reliance on public support.
4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT
4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns
- RUF Narratives:
- Territorial Gains/Victories: Continued claims of "liberation" and advances, often exaggerated or unverified, presented with selective video/photo evidence (e.g., Chernovaya Zirka). Pro-RUF channels present maps and graphs claiming significant monthly territorial gains.
- Denial/Downplay of Damage: Attempts to downplay UAF strike impacts (e.g., "windows simply broken" in Donetsk).
- Ukraine as Aggressor/Terrorist: Accusations of UAF targeting civilians (Kurakhove, Donetsk strike framing) and linking UAF to "Crocus" terror attack. This is a significant escalation of the demonization narrative, now directly accusing Ukrainian leadership. Claims of UAF chemical weapons caches (FSB claim) further this narrative.
- Internal Strength/Morale: Propaganda pieces celebrating "Veterans Day," showcasing military awards, and promoting military cohesion (e.g., "paratrooper brotherhood") to boost domestic morale. Highlighting internal anti-corruption measures (Ivanov trial, other dismissals) to project competence and accountability, despite widespread skepticism. Recognition of the 36th Combined Arms Army as "Guards" boosts unit pride.
- Western Ineffectiveness/Ukrainian Weakness: Claims of "meat assaults," "critical air defense deficit" in Kyiv to undermine UAF morale and Western support. Bloomberg's assessment is being used to amplify this narrative.
- Anti-Azerbaijan/Armenia Campaign: Intensified information operation against Azerbaijan, accusing them of "unfriendly steps," detaining Russian journalists, and opening criminal cases against Russian citizens (countering Azerbaijani claims of torture/murder). This is a multi-faceted campaign to frame Azerbaijan negatively and potentially justify future actions, portraying Azerbaijan as an "enemy republic" or "bandit republic." Extension of this narrative to Armenia considering ending Russian TV broadcasts, portraying them as "biting the attacked bear."
- Internal Sabotage/Deep Strikes: Attempts to frame UAF deep strikes as internal sabotage (e.g., Izhevsk drone attack potentially launched from within Russia) to deflect blame and sow internal discord.
- Economic Stability: Official statements on minimum wage growth and support for industries aim to project economic stability despite war. Putin's decree on foreign investor guarantees aims to mitigate economic concerns.
- UAF Narratives:
- Successful Defense: Highlighting repelled assaults, captured RUF soldiers, and stabilized contact lines.
- Effective Deep Strikes: Emphasizing successful strikes against high-value RUF military-industrial and logistics targets (Izhevsk, Zaporizhzhia railway, Saratov refinery). Publicizing successful AD intercepts.
- RUF Atrocities: Documentation and prosecution of RUF war crimes (Kyiv Oblast).
- Civilian Impact: Reporting on civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure from RUF strikes.
- International Accountability: Push for a Special Tribunal on the crime of aggression. The US Congress resolution on abducted Ukrainian children supports this.
4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors
- Ukrainian Public Sentiment:
- Continued resilience and determination, evidenced by active fundraising for military needs and civilian recovery efforts.
- Growing frustration with civilian protection measures, particularly the lack of modular shelters in Kyiv, highlighting a need for better government response to civilian safety.
- Morale likely boosted by successful deep strikes and captured RUF soldiers. Public support for military efforts remains high.
- Russian Public Sentiment:
- Mixed: Efforts to boost morale through veteran support and economic promises. The Ivanov verdict aims to reinforce perceived government effectiveness and anti-corruption stance, potentially boosting public confidence in leadership, while some pro-RUF channels wish him "bad time in prison" showing internal cynicism.
- Underlying concerns visible through public discussions on utility tariffs, and economic issues, and new scams.
- Internal crackdowns (e.g., Ivanov's conviction, "foreign agent" charges like Yuri Dud's case) indicate state efforts to control information and suppress dissent, suggesting potential internal instability if left unchecked.
- Propaganda attempting to sow social discontent (e.g., Roma families vs. military families) points to perceived vulnerabilities in domestic cohesion.
- Public discussions and images of "frontline cats" aim to humanize soldiers and boost morale.
- Impact of Izhevsk attack on civilian life (cancellation of mass events) demonstrates the direct effect of UAF strikes on Russian territory.
4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments
- For Ukraine: Strong and sustained international support continues, manifested in German air defense pledges, Polish ammunition production, Norwegian F-35 protection of aid hubs, Canadian financial aid from frozen assets, IMF tranche, German support for NATO entry, US demands for abducted children's return, and Norwegian investment in Ukrainian defense industry. Zelenskiy's signing for the Special Tribunal reinforces international legal pressure on Russia. Foreign Affairs magazine's assessment that Ukraine can still win provides a positive narrative.
- For Russia: Diplomatic engagements continue with Central Asian partners (Kyrgyzstan) and new ambassadors (Afghanistan). However, these are overshadowed by escalating tensions with Azerbaijan and a potential new diplomatic challenge with Armenia. Germany is preparing to create a National Security Council, likely in response to Russian aggression, which further isolates Russia from Western security structures.
- Neutral/Contested:
- Russia-Azerbaijan Diplomatic Crisis: High tension, with reciprocal accusations of detentions, torture, and "unfriendly steps." Russia views Azerbaijan's actions as a "demolition of relations" and an attempt to cause a split, demanding the immediate release of Russian journalists. Azerbaijan frames its actions as legitimate law enforcement against drug trafficking and cybercrime. Pro-RUF channels accuse Azerbaijan of forming a "hostage exchange fund." This situation poses a significant distraction and potential diplomatic isolation risk for Russia, further complicated by internal Russian security actions in Yekaterinburg related to the dispute.
- Moldova: Ongoing Russian influence in Moldovan politics through legal pressure on the Gagauzian leader, coinciding with high-level EU visits.
- Russia-Armenia Relations: Armenia is now also considering banning Russian TV channels, indicating a potential widening of anti-Russian sentiment in the South Caucasus, further challenging Russia's regional influence.
5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)
5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)
- Donbas Focus: RUF will maintain sustained high-intensity offensive operations along the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes, aiming for incremental territorial gains. They will continue to apply pressure on Chasiv Yar by consolidating gains in the Kanal microdistrict and attempting to cross the canal. Continued heavy KAB/KAR launches into Donetsk Oblast. Confidence: HIGH.
- Persistent Deep Strikes: RUF will continue deep strikes on Ukrainian critical infrastructure and military facilities across the country, particularly in Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv, and specifically targeting agricultural enterprises, industrial/residential areas, and Kamianske district. Expect continued retaliatory deep strikes against military-industrial targets within Russia. The crash of a Su-34 may lead to a temporary reduction in KAB launches from that specific airframe type, but RUF will likely compensate with other aviation assets or missile strikes. Confidence: HIGH.
- Information Warfare Escalation: Expect continued aggressive IO leveraging military successes and exploiting internal Ukrainian vulnerabilities. This includes intensified efforts to project internal strength, deter collaboration, promote historical propaganda, and potentially new false flag operations related to WMD. The linking of the "Crocus" attack to Ukraine is a significant escalation of this. The IO campaign against Azerbaijan and Armenia will continue to escalate, potentially involving more aggressive narratives to delegitimize these states or portray them as Western pawns. Confidence: HIGH.
- Logistical Disruption Countermeasures: RUF will reinforce efforts to secure their internal logistical lines, likely increasing counter-intelligence and security measures following successful UAF railway sabotage in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. Confidence: HIGH.
- Adaptation of Drone Use: RUF will likely increase the tactical use of "Geranium" drones directly on the front lines to support ground offensives, especially if claimed production increases. This will put additional pressure on UAF frontline AD. Confidence: HIGH.
- Internal Consolidation: RUF will continue high-profile internal crackdowns on perceived corruption and dissent (e.g., Ivanov's case, "foreign agent" cases) to project control and deter opposition. Confidence: HIGH.
5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)
- Zaporizhzhia Offensive: RUF initiates a major ground offensive on the Zaporizhzhia front, leveraging the newly deployed Kadyrovite units, aiming for a significant breakthrough or encirclement of key UAF defensive lines, potentially threatening major urban centers. This would be coupled with sustained massed missile and drone strikes aimed at overwhelming UAF air defense and critical infrastructure across Ukraine, including targeting new areas like Izhevsk (military enterprises), Ulyanovsk, Kazan, and Nizhnekamsk, as well as a new wave of deep strikes against high-value military targets in Ukrainian western oblasts. Confidence: MEDIUM.
- Escalated Border Incursions: RUF escalates ground incursions and attempts to establish more significant and permanent "buffer zones" in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts, potentially leading to increased cross-border combat and humanitarian impact, possibly employing larger force concentrations, or targeting critical civilian infrastructure in these regions more intensely to create a humanitarian crisis. Confidence: MEDIUM.
- Chemical/Biological False Flag: RUF orchestrates a chemical or biological false flag attack, particularly in Donetsk or Luhansk, using the "discovered chemical weapons caches" as a pretext to escalate the conflict or justify the use of their own unconventional weapons. Confidence: LOW.
- Direct Military Action against Azerbaijan/Armenia: In response to escalating diplomatic tensions, Russia could conduct overt or covert military actions against Azerbaijan or Armenia (e.g., cyberattacks, proxy attacks, or limited kinetic actions), potentially destabilizing the Caucasus region and diverting Russian resources, though unlikely to be a large-scale intervention. Confidence: LOW.
5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points
- Immediate (Next 24-48 hours): Expect continued high-intensity combat in Pokrovsk, Toretsk, and Chasiv Yar. Sustained RUF missile and drone attacks across Ukraine. Further escalation of RUF-Azerbaijan/Armenia information warfare. Ukrainian forces should anticipate further attempts to consolidate RUF gains in Chasiv Yar's Kanal microdistrict and probes across the canal. Increased cross-border artillery and drone activity into Sumy and Kharkiv. Decision Point: Ukraine's immediate response to further RUF consolidation in Chasiv Yar and the protection of the Western bank of the canal. Decision Point: Ukraine's capacity to continue effective AD intercepts against high-volume RUF strikes. Confidence: HIGH.
- Near-Term (Next 72 hours - 1 week): The deployment of Kadyrovite units to Zaporizhzhia suggests a potential operational window for a major offensive in that sector. This will be a critical period for UAF to monitor and prepare defenses. The ongoing diplomatic crisis with Azerbaijan and Armenia could either escalate or be temporarily de-escalated, impacting RUF's focus. Confidence: MEDIUM.
- Mid-Term (Next 2-4 weeks): RUF will likely continue efforts to integrate newly occupied territories, focusing on administrative and economic "normalization." UAF will continue to seek opportunities for counter-offensive actions where RUF lines are weakest or overextended. The South Caucasus tensions may continue to be a significant diplomatic and information warfare front for Russia. Confidence: MEDIUM.
6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS
- Collection Requirement 1 (Enemy Ground Strength - Zaporizhzhia): ISR assets (UAV, SIGINT, OSINT, HUMINT) to confirm the full strength, composition, and specific deployment locations of RUF second-echelon forces, particularly Kadyrovite units and other reserves in the Zaporizhzhia area and near the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast border.
- Priority: CRITICAL
- Indicators: Increased vehicle concentrations, field camp establishment, unusual communication patterns, high-level personnel movement.
- Collection Requirement 2 (EW Emitter Locations): Enhanced SIGINT and ELINT capabilities to precisely locate and characterize key RUF EW systems impacting UAF operations in Chasiv Yar, Pokrovsk, Toretsk, and other critical sectors to enable counter-EW operations.
- Priority: CRITICAL
- Indicators: Changes in jamming patterns, specific frequency usage, correlation with UAF comms/GPS degradation.
- Collection Requirement 3 (RUF Logistics Vulnerabilities): HUMINT and OSINT to assess the sustainability of RUF's current operational tempo, including detailed intelligence on fuel, ammunition, and personnel resupply rates, as well as vulnerabilities in their railway and road networks, especially following recent partisan actions.
- Priority: HIGH
- Indicators: Increased appeals for public donations, reported equipment breakdowns, changes in resupply convoy frequency/size, civilian reports of logistical issues.
- Collection Requirement 4 (RUF Deep Strike Munitions Stockpiles/Production): Satellite imagery, SIGINT, and HUMINT to assess the current state of RUF missile and Shahed UAV stockpiles and production rates, particularly after the Izhevsk strike and claims of increased Geranium production. Analysis of drone debris (e.g., new tail numbers in Odesa) should be expedited for further insights into production and deployment.
- Priority: HIGH
- Indicators: Changes in industrial activity at known production sites, patterns of usage, reports of internal supply chain issues, changes in deep strike tempo or target selection.
- Collection Requirement 5 (Azerbaijan-Armenia-Russia Dynamics): Continuous monitoring of diplomatic communications, state media, and pro-Russian/pro-Azerbaijani/pro-Armenian Telegram channels for any shifts in the diplomatic standoff and its potential impact on RUF's strategic calculus or resource allocation, including potential for military escalation or further regional destabilization.
- Priority: HIGH
- Indicators: Tone shifts in official statements, bilateral meetings, economic sanctions or retaliatory measures, changes in military posture in border regions, reports of internal Russian security actions related to the dispute.
7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS
- Chasiv Yar Defense: Immediately reinforce the western bank of the Siverskyi Donets-Donbas canal with additional infantry and anti-tank teams. Prioritize the deployment of mobile counter-drone and EW systems to the area to protect ISR assets and disrupt RUF FPV and reconnaissance drones. Target RUF TOS-1A systems and glide bomb release points immediately upon detection.
- ISR Prioritization - Zaporizhzhia: Reallocate and maximize all available ISR assets (including new Western systems) to the Zaporizhzhia front to detect and track the movement and deployment of Kadyrovite units and any other significant RUF force build-ups, particularly along the Mokri Yaly river. Prepare pre-emptive fire missions for identified concentrations.
- Deep Strike Targeting - Expanded: Continue and intensify deep strikes against RUF military-industrial targets within Russia, focusing on facilities involved in UAV, missile, and artillery production (e.g., Izhevsk Kupol plant, other identified sites), and energy infrastructure (Saratov refinery). Exploit observed patterns in RUF air defense vulnerabilities. Prioritize targeting RUF tactical airfields supporting KAB/KAR launches.
- Counter-Logistics Operations: Continue and expand partisan operations and long-range precision strikes against RUF railway and road logistics in occupied territories, especially in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, to degrade RUF sustainment capabilities and exploit the vulnerabilities revealed by recent successful railway re-blocking.
- Air Defense Reinforcement & Dispersal: Advocate strongly for the urgent delivery of additional Western air defense systems, particularly mobile short-to-medium range systems, to cover critical civilian and military infrastructure gaps, especially around Kyiv and other major urban centers that have been repeatedly targeted. Advise civilian authorities on increased dispersal of critical assets and further hardening of shelters. Expedite training on new AD systems.
- Information Operations (Friendly): Capitalize on the successful SBU deep strike on the Izhevsk "Kupol" plant and the Saratov refinery to significantly boost domestic and international morale, showcasing Ukraine's growing long-range precision strike capabilities against RUF military production and energy infrastructure. Publicize the capture of RUF soldiers in Dnipropetrovsk to discredit RUF territorial claims and expose their casualty rates. Aggressively counter RUF false flag narratives, especially regarding "chemical weapons" and "terrorist" accusations, and RUF attempts to link "Crocus" to Ukraine.
- Training Adaptation & Force Protection: Fully integrate the new anti-UAV training protocols (increased basic training time) across all UAF units, emphasizing both offensive drone operations and defensive counter-drone tactics. Distribute and train on heat stress mitigation protocols for all personnel due to anticipated extreme temperatures.
END OF REPORT
