Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME: 010054Z JUL 25

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain

• Donetsk Oblast:

  • RUF continues high-intensity offensive operations along the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes. RUF claims of territorial gains, including Novoserhiivka, Shevchenko, Molodetske, Novoukrainka, and Novonikolaevka are partially corroborated by RUF-sourced visuals. RUF sources claim entry into Udachne and "liberation" of Chervona Zirka (Krasna Zirka), reinforced by new RUF video. Confidence: MEDIUM (on verified control of Novonikolaevka); HIGH (on RUF claim with supporting visual evidence of presence and combat and confirmed control of Chervona Zirka).
  • TASS reports RUF forces are approximately 2.5 km from the suburbs of Krasnoarmiisk (Pokrovsk).
  • UAF General Staff confirms Pokrovsk remains the hottest direction, repelling 41 assaults in the last 24 hours, with continued clashes near Popiv Yar, Myrne, Myrolubivka, Malynivka, Koptyeve, Promin, Lysivka, Udachne, Kotlyarivka, Horikhove and Oleksiyivka.
  • UAF General Staff reports continued clashes near Kurdumivka, Toretsk, Leonidivka, and towards Yablunivka. UAF "ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS" confirms RUF control over a portion of Toretsk's ruins but highlights UAF's continued successful defense against persistent assaults. Confidence: HIGH.
  • RUF sources continue to indicate persistent focus on Chasiv Yar, claiming "completion is near", and UAF General Staff confirms clashes near Chasiv Yar and towards Bila Hora. Russian forces have successfully advanced into the Kanal microdistrict, establishing a foothold east of the canal. UAF units are conducting a tactical fighting withdrawal to more defensible, prepared positions on the western side of the microdistrict and along the canal itself. Confidence: HIGH.
  • RUF "Два майора" posts a video of a remote-controlled, tracked UGV equipped with a dual machine gun mount operating on the Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiisk) direction, showing it moving through damaged urban terrain and operating its weapons system. Confidence: HIGH.
  • UAF drone footage shows high RUF casualties near Pokrovsk, including an "unsuccessful attack by motorcyclists." Confidence: HIGH.
  • TASS reports FPV drones of Russian forces have started destroying UAF equipment and personnel on the outskirts of Konstantinovka, suggesting RUF is extending its drone reach to new forward areas and intensifying pressure on Konstantinovka. Confidence: HIGH.
  • UAF strike on Donetsk: Mash na Donbasse, WarGonzo, and Colonelcassad report a UAF missile strike on Donetsk, with smoke visible in the center and explosions continuing for over five minutes. TASS confirmed at least 1 civilian death and 3 wounded from the strike on Donetsk. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: UAF Air Force reports RUF KAB/KAR launches from tactical aviation on Donetsk Oblast. Confidence: HIGH.

• Luhansk Oblast:

  • UAF General Staff reports all enemy attacks repelled in the Lyman direction (including near Nadiya, Novoyehorivka, Ridkodub, Zelena Dolyna, Yampolivka, Hrekivka, Torske and towards Serebryanka and Hryhorivka).
  • RUF claims continue regarding the "liberation" of Petrovske (Hrekivka) and complete "liberation of LNR." TASS reports Russian forces are clearing Petrovske, with approximately one kilometer remaining to reach the LNR border. Colonelcassad later corrected, stating two more villages near the border need to be cleared. Confidence: HIGH (on RUF claim and correction).
  • UAF drone attack on Luhansk confirmed, causing fires and active RUF air defense. TASS reports over 20 UAVs flew over Luhansk. Confidence: HIGH.

• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Dnipro):

  • RUF attacked Nikopol district overnight with heavy artillery and FPV drones; 12 RUF UAVs were shot down.
  • RUF claims from Дневник Десантника🇷🇺 state RUF forces struck railway infrastructure, fuel depots, ammunition warehouses, and logistics routes in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. Confidence: MEDIUM (on BDA verification); HIGH (on RUF claim of widespread strikes).
  • Kryvyi Rih: Confirmed Shahed attack on a military enlistment office (TCC), with 3 civilians wounded. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Colonelcassad claims the 114th Brigade of the RUF has officially "liberated" the first settlement in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast – Dachne (Udachne?), and raised the Russian flag. Confidence: LOW (on verified control); HIGH (on RUF claim with supporting visual evidence).
  • UAF Center for Countering Disinformation (CPD) claims Russians did not break through to Dnipropetropavsk Oblast, with battles ongoing near the administrative border, indicating successful UAF defense against ground incursions. Confidence: HIGH.

• Sumy Oblast:

  • UAF Commander-in-Chief Syrskyi states the advance of Russian troops in border areas has been completely stopped and the contact line stabilized.
  • UAF General Staff reports repelling 22 Russian army assaults in Kursk and North Slobozhansky (Sumy) directions.
  • RUF sources, however, continue to claim offensive operations and significant advances.
  • RUF is conducting KAB launches and drone activity into Sumy Oblast. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Konotop: MoD Russia claims and provides video of "Geran-2 UAVs destroyed a temporary deployment area of the AFU 58th Separate Motorised Rifle Brigade and a UAV depot near Konotop in Sumy region." Confidence: HIGH.
  • БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС posts drone footage showing several deceased Russian soldiers in a "demilitarized buffer zone" in Sumy Oblast, indicating successful UAF defensive actions and high RUF casualties. Confidence: HIGH.

• Kharkiv Oblast:

  • RUF continues aviation airstrikes (Vilkhuvatka, Pidlyman) and ground clashes near Vovchansk, Hlyboke, Stroyivka and towards Kutkivka, and Kupyansk direction near Holubivka, Stepova Novoselivka and Zelenyi Hai.
  • Vovchansk: Colonelcassad video confirms a TOS-1A heavy flamethrower system strike on the "butter extraction plant" in Vovchansk. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Pisochyn: Reports confirm 8 people were injured, including one child, as a result of a RUF drone attack on Pisochyn, Kharkiv Oblast, marking a new area of direct civilian impact. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Korotych airfield: Дневник Десантника🇷🇺 claims "В Харьковской области ВС РФ нанесли удар по аэродрому Коротич." Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: UAF Air Force reports RUF KAB/KAR launches from tactical aviation on Kharkiv Oblast from the east. Confidence: HIGH.

• Zaporizhzhia Oblast:

  • RUF claims breakthrough to the center of Kamyanske on the Zaporizhzhia front. АРХАНГЕЛ СПЕЦНАЗА reports "Бои за Каменское идут полным ходом" (Battles for Kamyanske are in full swing), indicating it remains a contested area with active combat. Confidence: LOW (on verified RUF control); HIGH (on RUF claim of penetration and ongoing heavy combat).
  • UAF General Staff reports continued clashes near Kamyanske, and near Malynivka (Huliaipole direction).
  • ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS reports that Kadyrovites (Chechen special forces) are being prepared for assaults on the Zaporizhzhia direction, with approximately 15 military trucks moving them to the area of Enerhodar / Melitopol / Vasylivka. This indicates a potential major RUF buildup and offensive intent. Confidence: HIGH.
  • РБК-Україна reports an RUF attack on an agricultural enterprise in Polohy district, Zaporizhzhia Oblast. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: 🇺🇦 Запорізька обласна військова адміністрація 🇺🇦 and РБК-Україна confirm a civilian vehicle was engulfed in flames in Zaporizhzhia after a Russian attack. Information about casualties is being clarified. Confidence: HIGH.

• Kherson Oblast:

  • RUF and UAF reports indicate continued positional fighting, shelling, and aerial reconnaissance.
  • UAF "Сили оборони Півдня України" posts photos of civilian infrastructure damaged by RUF shelling. Confidence: HIGH.
  • 'Оперативний ЗСУ' reports that RUF shelled the Central District of Kherson, killing one man and wounding another.

• Odesa Oblast:

  • Significant overnight RUF Shahed UAV attacks. A multi-story residential building was hit, resulting in two confirmed civilian fatalities (a married couple) and four injured. 14 Shahed UAVs were destroyed by UAF AD.
  • Odesa Coastal Logistics/Oil Refinery: RUF reports a "powerful strike and huge fire" at an enemy object near Odesa, accompanied by video evidence of large, intense fires. TASS reports RUF struck an oil terminal supplying fuel to the Ukrainian Navy. NASA satellite data indicates fires in the area of grain and fuel terminals in Odesa, strongly corroborating the RUF strike claims. Confidence: HIGH.

• Mykolaiv Oblast:

  • Mykolaiv was struck by ballistic missiles (6 Iskanders) and Shahed UAVs overnight, with confirmed impacts on infrastructure. Confidence: HIGH.
  • RUF 'Дневник Десантника🇷🇺' claims Russian forces destroyed Kulbakino airfield in Mykolaiv.

• Kyiv Oblast:

  • The massed RUF overnight attack included cruise missiles passing Slavutych towards Kyiv. UAF AD was operating effectively.
  • Two UAF Air Force pilots, Lieutenant Colonel Maksym Ustymenko and Oleksiy "Moonfish" Mes, were killed overnight while repelling the massed attack.
  • UAF General Staff confirmed a massed missile-drone attack with over 500 air targets launched and 475 targets neutralized, with an additional 226 suppressed by EW. Confidence: HIGH.

• Cherkasy Oblast:

  • RUF attacked Smila with missiles and drones, resulting in 11 casualties, including 2 children, and damage to three nine-story buildings and a college. UAF AD shot down most incoming threats. Confidence: HIGH.

• Poltava Oblast:

  • Kremenchug: RUF "Colonelcassad" video confirms a successful strike on the Kremenchug oil refinery. Confidence: HIGH.

• Lviv Oblast:

  • Drohobych: RUF "Colonelcassad" posts video showing multiple missile/drone impacts and explosions at a refinery in Drohobych, Lviv Oblast, confirming a successful RUF strike. Confidence: HIGH.

1.1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations

• Ukraine: European reports of temperatures up to +42°C suggest potential heat stress on personnel and equipment across Ukraine. Confidence: HIGH.
• Russia: Новости Москвы reports a North Atlantic cyclone "Cornelius" has arrived in Moscow, bringing 3 days of rain and colder temperatures. Confidence: HIGH.

1.1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures

• RUF Dispositions:
  • Donetsk: High-intensity offensive continues on Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes. Confirmed presence of units from the "Center" and "Vostok" groups, 30th Separate Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade, and VDV (98th Guards Airborne Division confirmed in Chasiv Yar, 247th Air Assault Regiment). Confidence: HIGH.
  • Zaporizhzhia: Kadyrovite (Chechen special forces) transfer to Enerhodar/Melitopol/Vasylivka area with 15 military trucks indicates a significant buildup for potential assault operations. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Sumy: Claims of 50,000 RUF personnel concentrated in the area, outnumbering UAF by approximately 3:1. Confidence: LOW.
  • ASTRA reports five Su-34 fighter jets were damaged in a UAV attack on a military airfield in Volgograd Oblast on June 27. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: TASS video shows operators of RUF "Bars-31" drone unit destroying a truck with a UAF anti-aircraft gun. This appears to be a UAF military vehicle. Confidence: HIGH.
• RUF Equipment/Tactics:
  • UAVs: Continued extensive use of FPV drones, reconnaissance UAVs, and Shahed-type strike UAVs ("Geranium-2") for deep strikes. Reports of a new "Chernika" drone in Kharkiv. Deployment of a remote-controlled, tracked UGV with a dual machine gun mount on the Pokrovsk direction. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Precision Fires: Continued use of FABs with UMPK glide kits (Chasiv Yar), Lancet loitering munitions, and TOS-1A heavy flamethrower systems. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Mine Warfare: Confirmed use of minefields by RUF. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Foreign Fighters: Confirmed use of Latin American (Argentina, Brazil, Cuba) and Cameroonian mercenaries as assault troops. Confidence: MEDIUM.
  • Logistics/Funding: Continued reliance on public fundraising for critical equipment. Confidence: HIGH.
• RUF Control Measures / IO:
  • Active recruitment campaigns for specialized units.
  • Continued IO exploiting UAF casualties and internal issues, discrediting Western aid.
  • Increased diplomatic tension with Azerbaijan (alleged FSB detentions, Russian MFA protests). Confidence: HIGH.
  • Putin discussed the integration of Donbas and Novorossiya by 2030, reinforcing long-term intent for political and economic integration of occupied territories. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: Yaroslav Nilov proposed celebrating July 1st as "Veterans of Combat Operations Day" in Russian regions, aiming to boost morale and national pride for military personnel. Confidence: HIGH.

1.2. Key Terrain Adjustments (Summary of Confirmed and Claimed Changes)

• Confirmed RUF Territorial Gains/Presence:
  • Chervona Zirka (Krasna Zirka) (Donetsk Oblast): RUF claims "liberation" confirmed by RUF MoD video. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Portion of Toretsk (Donetsk Oblast): RUF controls part of the ruins, UAF holds the city. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Kanal Microdistrict, Chasiv Yar (Donetsk Oblast): RUF has established a confirmed foothold east of the Siverskyi Donets-Donbas canal. Confidence: HIGH.
• Contested/Claimed RUF Penetration:
  • Novonikolaevka (Donetsk Oblast): RUF claims "liberation" and visual corroboration. Confidence: MEDIUM.
  • Shevchenko (Donetsk Oblast): RUF claims "liberation" and visual corroboration. Confidence: MEDIUM.
  • Kamyanske (Zaporizhzhia Oblast): RUF claims penetration to the center and flag raising. UAF sources indicate heavy ongoing battles. Confidence: LOW (on verified control); HIGH (on RUF claim of penetration).
  • Dachne (Dnipro Oblast): Colonelcassad claims "liberation" by 114th Brigade, raising flags. Confidence: LOW (on verified control); HIGH (on RUF claim with supporting visual evidence).
• Confirmed RUF Strikes on Specific Infrastructure/Facilities:
  • Drohobych refinery (Lviv Oblast): Confirmed successful missile strike. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Kremenchug oil refinery (Poltava Oblast): Confirmed successful strike. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Vovchansk "butter extraction plant" (Kharkiv Oblast): Confirmed TOS-1A strike. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Odesa Coastal Logistics/Naval Fuel Terminal / Oil Refinery (Burlachya Balka): Confirmed "powerful strike" and fires, likely by Shaheds. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Konotop UAV depot/UAF deployment (Sumy Oblast): Confirmed Geran-2 strike. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Kryvyi Rih TCC (Military Enlistment Office) (Dnipropetropavsk Oblast): Confirmed Shahed strike. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Railway infrastructure, fuel depots, ammunition warehouses, logistics routes (Dnipropetropavsk Oblast): RUF claims widespread strikes. Confidence: MEDIUM.
  • Korotych airfield (Kharkiv Oblast): RUF claims successful strike. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Military airfield in Volgograd Oblast (Russia): ASTRA reports 5 Su-34 fighter jets damaged by UAF UAV attack. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Agricultural enterprise in Polohy district, Zaporizhzhia Oblast: RUF attacked. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Donetsk and Yasynuvata (Donetsk Oblast): UAF confirmed strikes, causing fires and civilian casualties. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Luhansk (LNR): UAF drone attack confirmed, fires and RUF AD active. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: Zaporizhzhia (Zaporizhzhia Oblast): RUF attack caused a fire to a civilian vehicle. Casualties being clarified. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: TASS video claims RUF "Bars-31" drone unit destroyed a UAF truck with an anti-aircraft gun. Confidence: HIGH.
• New Area of Civilian Impact (RUF):
  • Pisochyn (Kharkiv Oblast): Confirmed drone attack with 8 casualties (including 1 child). Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: Zaporizhzhia (Zaporizhzhia Oblast): RUF attack caused a fire to a civilian vehicle. Casualties being clarified. Confidence: HIGH.
• New Area of Civilian Impact (UAF Cross-border):
  • Donetsk (DNR): Civilian casualties and fires reported after UAF missile strike. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Luhansk (LNR): UAF drone attack confirmed, fires and RUF AD active. Confidence: HIGH.
• UAF Tactical Advances/Counter-Offensive:
  • Oleksiyivka (Sumy Oblast): UAF claims advance, pushing RUF back from Sumy. Confidence: MEDIUM.
  • Pryyutne (Zaporizhzhia Oblast): UAF video shows successful tactical assault and capture of personnel. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Buffer Zone Demilitarization (Sumy): UAF drone footage shows deceased RUF soldiers, indicating successful UAF clearing operations. Confidence: HIGH.
  • DeepState video presents drone footage of "Darts" UAV units working on enemy logistics and counter-battery actions in Belgorod Oblast (BNR). Confidence: HIGH.

1.3. New UAF Achievements (Non-Combat):

• German FM Visit: Newly appointed German FM Johann Wadephul visited Ukraine, discussing transfer of additional air defense systems and potential military-industrial production in Ukraine. Confidence: HIGH.
• Polish Ammunition Production: Poland increasing ammunition production fivefold due to RUF threat. Confidence: HIGH.
• Norwegian F-35 Protection: Norwegian F-35s to protect main military aid hub in Poland. Confidence: HIGH.
• UAF Counter-Intelligence: SBU successfully detained a RUF agent couple who helped shell Odesa. Confidence: HIGH.
• Ukrainian Air Force Precision Strike: BUKUTUSOV PLUS video claims a highly successful UAF precision strike by MiG-29s with GBU-39 bombs destroying a RUF UAV repair base and drone operators on the southern front. Confidence: HIGH.
• UN Analysis on Olenivka: Internal UN analysis concluding the Olenivka killing was a "carefully planned crime" by the Russian Federation. Confidence: HIGH.
• Germany's NATO Stance: Germany now supports Ukraine's entry into NATO, citing Zelenskyy. Confidence: HIGH.
• IMF Financial Support: Ukraine will receive half a billion dollars from the IMF. Confidence: HIGH.
• NEW: RBC-Ukraine reports the return of three teenagers from occupied territories to Ukraine. Confidence: HIGH.

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (Threat Assessment)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action

• Capabilities:
  • Ground Offensive: RUF maintains significant offensive capability, particularly concentrated in Donetsk (Pokrovsk, Toretsk, Chasiv Yar) with confirmed ground advances into the Kanal microdistrict of Chasiv Yar. Deployment of Kadyrovites to Zaporizhzhia indicates preparation for a potential new major offensive. Use of motorcyclist attacks and UGVs signals tactical adaptations. Claimed "liberation" of Dachne in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast indicates expanded ground offensive reach. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Deep Strike: RUF demonstrates sustained capacity for massed missile and Shahed UAV attacks across Ukraine's depth, targeting critical infrastructure, military facilities, and civilian areas. Confirmed successful strike on a bridge over the Vovcha River near the Dnipropetropavsk Oblast border. The UAV attack on the Volgograd airfield, though by UAF, highlights the vulnerability of air assets to drone strikes, something RUF is also capable of. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Unmanned Systems: Extensive and evolving use of FPV, reconnaissance, and strike UAVs for ISR, targeting, and kinetic strikes. Continued development and deployment of new drone types. Reports of active RUF efforts to counter Ukrainian "Baba Yaga" drones. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Precision Fires: Continued effective use of FABs (Chasiv Yar), Lancet loitering munitions, and TOS-1A systems. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Electronic Warfare (EW): Pervasive EW employment, actively degrading Ukrainian C2 and ISR capabilities. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Foreign Fighter Integration: Continued reliance on and integration of foreign fighters. Confidence: HIGH.
• Intentions:
  • Donbas Seizure: Primary objective remains the complete capture of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts, with main efforts focused on Pokrovsk and Toretsk, and continued pressure on Chasiv Yar and Lyman. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Buffer Zone Creation: Continued efforts to establish and expand a "buffer zone" in border areas (Kharkiv, Sumy). Confidence: HIGH.
  • Degradation of Ukrainian Warfighting Capacity: Systematically targeting Ukrainian critical infrastructure, military administrative centers, and industrial facilities. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Information Control and Influence: Maintain robust IO campaigns to shape domestic and international narratives, undermine Ukrainian morale and international support. Intensified IO against countries like Azerbaijan. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Long-term Integration: Continued political and economic integration of occupied territories into the Russian Federation. Confidence: HIGH.
• Courses of Action (COAs):
  • MLCOA (Most Likely Course of Action): RUF will maintain sustained high-intensity offensive operations along the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes, aiming for incremental territorial gains, and continue to apply pressure on Chasiv Yar by consolidating gains in the Kanal microdistrict. They will likely launch further ground probes in Sumy and Kharkiv border regions, supported by continued FAB launches and drone activity. Deep strikes on Ukrainian critical infrastructure and military facilities across the country will continue. Expect continued aggressive IO leveraging military successes and exploiting internal Ukrainian vulnerabilities. Confidence: HIGH.
  • MDCOA (Most Dangerous Course of Action): RUF initiates a major ground offensive on the Zaporizhzhia front, leveraging the newly deployed Kadyrovite units, aiming for a significant breakthrough or encirclement of key UAF defensive lines, potentially threatening major urban centers. This would be coupled with sustained massed missile and drone strikes aimed at overwhelming UAF air defense and critical infrastructure. Confidence: MEDIUM.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations

• Motorcyclist Attacks: Confirmed use of motorcycle groups in Novonikolaevka capture. Confidence: HIGH.
• UGV Deployment: First confirmed combat deployment of a remote-controlled, armed UGV in Pokrovsk direction. Confidence: HIGH.
• UAV-heavy Assaults (Siversk): Significant increase in RUF UAV crews for assault actions in Siversk. Confidence: HIGH.
• Targeting Pattern for TCCs: Confirmed successive Shahed strikes on TCC (military enlistment office) buildings. Confidence: HIGH.
• Expanded Deep Strike Range: Claims of RUF strikes on railway infrastructure, fuel depots, ammunition warehouses, and logistics routes in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. Confidence: HIGH.
• New Drone Type "Chernika": Reported first use of a new drone type in Kharkiv. Confidence: HIGH.
• EW Integration in Ground Offensive: Pervasive and systematic use of EW in Chasiv Yar. Confidence: HIGH.
• NEW: TASS video confirms RUF "Bars-31" drone unit destroying a UAF truck with an anti-aircraft gun. Confidence: HIGH.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status

• Personnel: Continued reliance on foreign mercenaries suggests ongoing needs for combat personnel. Public fundraising for equipment also supplements state supply. Confidence: HIGH.
• Equipment/Materiel: Continued public fundraising for critical equipment indicates state supply chains are not fully meeting demand. Damage to 5 Su-34s in Volgograd indicates a significant materiel loss to RUF air power. Confidence: HIGH.
• Internal Corruption: Allegations of embezzlement in fortification construction (Belgorod) and the arrest of a Deputy Governor could impact local defensive readiness and resource allocation. Confidence: HIGH.
• Maritime Threats: Reports of a seventh civilian vessel linked to Russia being blown up in the Mediterranean indicate a potential new threat to Russian maritime logistics. Confidence: HIGH.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness

• Centralized Control: RUF's ability to conduct massed, multi-domain strikes and to coordinate ground offensives across multiple axes indicates a centralized and relatively effective command and control structure. Confidence: HIGH.
• Adaptive Tactics: Rapid adoption of new tactics suggests a degree of tactical flexibility and adaptive C2. Confidence: HIGH.
• Information Operations Coordination: Consistent messaging across various RUF and pro-RUF channels points to a centrally coordinated and adaptive IO effort. Confidence: HIGH.
• Internal Issues: Reports of "refuseniks" and internal dissent suggest potential C2 challenges related to personnel management and morale, though these appear localized. Corruption related to fortifications also highlights a systemic issue. Confidence: MEDIUM.

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (Blue Force Tracking)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness

• Defensive Operations: UAF maintains a strong defensive posture, particularly in Donetsk (Pokrovsk, Toretsk, Chasiv Yar) and the Sumy/Kharkiv border regions, successfully repelling numerous RUF assaults. Despite heavy pressure in Chasiv Yar's Kanal microdistrict, UAF is conducting a cohesive fighting withdrawal to prepared positions. Confidence: HIGH.
• Active Defense: UAF is capable of local counter-attacks and clearing operations (e.g., demilitarized buffer zone in Sumy, Oleksiyivka advance, Pryyutne assault). UAF successful UAV attack on a RUF airfield in Volgograd Oblast demonstrates deep strike capability against military targets. Confidence: HIGH.
• Air Defense: UAF AD remains largely effective in intercepting a significant percentage of RUF missiles and UAVs, despite saturation attacks. Confidence: HIGH.
• UAV Capabilities: UAF continues to demonstrate highly effective FPV drone operations for kinetic strikes, reconnaissance, and counter-battery fire. Confidence: HIGH.
• Counter-Intelligence: Successful SBU operations against RUF agent networks indicate robust counter-intelligence capabilities. Confidence: HIGH.
• Logistical Sustainment: UAF demonstrates continued logistical support to frontline units, supplemented by significant public and international aid. Confidence: HIGH.
• Leadership and Morale: High-level strategic meetings (Zelenskyy with military leadership, including German FM) indicate continued coordinated governance. Confidence: HIGH.
• Personnel Management: Legislative changes to provide mobilization deferments for volunteers indicate proactive efforts to manage force generation. Confidence: HIGH.
• NEW: UAF Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration and RBC-Ukraine confirm the aftermath of a Russian attack in Zaporizhzhia, showing a burning civilian vehicle. This highlights the ongoing threat to civilian areas. Confidence: HIGH.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks

• Successes:
  • Donetsk: Repelling 41 assaults near Pokrovsk (last 24 hours). UAF drone footage shows high RUF casualties. UAF capture of Russian POWs. UAF strikes on Donetsk and Yasynuvata. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Sumy: UAF Commander-in-Chief Syrskyi confirms RUF advance completely stopped. UAF successfully repelled 16/22 RUF assaults. SSO UA_REG_Team cleared a "demilitarized buffer zone" of Russian soldiers. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Kharkiv: GUR fighters ambushed and "mowed down" an enemy motor group. Phoenix unit identified and destroyed a RUF BMP and checkpoint. UAF AD shot down a Molniya UAV over Kharkiv. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Zaporizhzhia: UAF repelling RUF attempts to capture a bridgehead in Kamyanske. Successful tactical assault by 23rd Separate Brigade capturing two opponents in Pryyutne. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Odesa: 14 Shahed UAVs destroyed by UAF AD. SBU detained RUF agents. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Kyiv: UAF AD effectively repelled massed missile and drone attack, neutralizing 475 out of over 500 targets. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Southern Front: BUKUTUSOV PLUS video claims a highly successful UAF precision strike by MiG-29s with GBU-39 bombs destroying a RUF UAV repair base and drone operators. Confidence: HIGH.
  • UAV attack on Volgograd airfield, damaging 5 Su-34 jets. Confidence: HIGH.
  • UN internal analysis confirms Olenivka was a "carefully planned crime" by RUF. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Germany's reported support for Ukraine's NATO entry. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: Return of three teenagers from occupied territories. Confidence: HIGH.
• Setbacks:
  • Donetsk (Chasiv Yar): RUF has successfully established a foothold in the Kanal microdistrict, east of the canal. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Kharkiv: RUF ground attacks on Vovchansk and Lyptsi continue. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Deep Strikes: Continued successful RUF strikes on critical infrastructure in rear areas (Drohobych, Kremenchug, Odesa), military facilities (Konotop, Kryvyi Rih TCC, Korotych airfield, agricultural enterprise in Polohy district), and civilian areas (Pisochyn, Smila, Odesa residential building, Donetsk). Loss of two UAF Air Force pilots. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Territorial Losses (Claimed): RUF claims of taking Novonikolaevka, Shevchenko, Molodetske, Novoukrainka, and Udachne. Colonelcassad claims "liberation" of Dachne in Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. Confidence: MEDIUM.
  • Casualties: Significant civilian casualties reported across multiple oblasts. Military casualties from persistent combat. Confidence: HIGH.
  • EW Impact: Pervasive RUF EW is degrading Ukrainian C2 and ISR capabilities. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: RUF drone unit "Bars-31" claims to have destroyed a UAF truck with an anti-aircraft gun. Confidence: HIGH.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints

• Air Defense: Continued high expenditure of AD munitions against sustained RUF missile and drone attacks. Need for additional AD systems, particularly for mobile battlefield protection. German FM visit discussing potential transfer of additional AD is positive. Confidence: HIGH.
• Ammunition: Continued need for artillery and other munitions for sustained defensive and counter-offensive operations. Poland's fivefold increase in ammunition production is a significant positive. Confidence: HIGH.
• Drones and EW: Continued demand for FPV and reconnaissance drones, and counter-drone/EW systems. UAF fundraising efforts indicate ongoing need. Confidence: HIGH.
• Logistics Security: Norwegian F-35 deployment to protect the Polish aid hub highlights ongoing vulnerability of logistical supply lines. Confidence: HIGH.
• Personnel: Ongoing need for personnel, managed through mobilization and volunteer incentives. Confidence: HIGH.
• EW Capabilities: Immediate need for mobile friendly EW teams to counter Russian drone reconnaissance and C2 nodes. Confidence: HIGH.

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (Cognitive Domain)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns

• RUF Narratives:
  • "Liberation" Narrative: RUF continues to frame territorial gains as "liberation," especially in Donetsk, and claims 100% "liberation" of LNR. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Demoralization/Attrition: Propagating narratives of high UAF losses, low morale, and forced mobilization. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Discrediting Western Aid: Highlighting vulnerabilities of Western military equipment. Confidence: HIGH.
  • False Flag/Blame Shifting: Accusing Ukraine of war crimes, actively denying the UN analysis on Olenivka. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Russian Resilience/Strength: Promoting domestic stability, showcasing military capabilities (new RUF video of Bars-31 drone unit destroying a UAF truck). Confidence: HIGH. NEW: Yaroslav Nilov's proposal for "Veterans of Combat Operations Day" aims to boost morale and national pride. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Anti-Azerbaijan Sentiment: Escalating IO against Azerbaijan. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Targeting Civilian Objects: RUF claims responsibility for strikes on civilian infrastructure and often portrays them as legitimate military targets or attributes civilian casualties to UAF AD. Confidence: HIGH.
• Ukrainian Narratives:
  • Heroism and Resilience: Highlighting individual acts of bravery, units' combat successes, and civilian resilience. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Russian War Crimes: Reporting on alleged war crimes by RUF soldiers and showing damaged civilian infrastructure. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Russian Attrition: Emphasizing high RUF casualties and equipment losses (e.g., damaged Su-34s at Volgograd airfield). Confidence: HIGH.
  • Exposing Russian Weaknesses: Highlighting RUF personnel issues, internal corruption, and perceived foreign policy missteps. Confidence: HIGH.
  • International Support: Showcasing diplomatic visits and military aid commitments. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Government Functionality: Demonstrating continued operation of state services and judicial processes. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: The return of three teenagers from occupied territories is a strong positive narrative for UAF. Confidence: HIGH.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Resilience: Continued operation of civilian services and community events indicate civilian resilience. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Impact of Casualties: Civilian casualties from missile/drone strikes cause grief and anger, fueling resolve but also increasing stress. Loss of pilots highlights the personal cost. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Mobilization: Internal policy changes on mobilization deferment indicate an awareness of public sentiment. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Trust in Government: SBU's successful counter-intelligence operations and UN analysis on Olenivka likely bolster public trust. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: The return of three teenagers from occupied territories will likely boost national morale. Confidence: HIGH.
• Russian Morale:
  • Domestic Support: Government efforts to provide benefits for military families aim to maintain domestic support. Confidence: HIGH. NEW: Proposal for "Veterans of Combat Operations Day" aims to boost morale. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Internal Dissent: Reports of deserting servicemen and attempted arson indicate isolated but significant instances of internal dissent. Confidence: MEDIUM.
  • Corruption: High-profile arrest of a Belgorod Deputy Governor could erode public trust. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Economic Impact: Reports of rising utility tariffs and concerns over bank stability could affect public sentiment. Confidence: HIGH.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments

• Support for Ukraine:
  • Germany: New German FM's visit and discussions on AD systems signify continued strong support. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Poland: Fivefold increase in ammunition production. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Norway: F-35 deployment to protect Polish aid hub. Confidence: HIGH.
  • UN: Internal UN analysis on Olenivka strengthens international condemnation. Confidence: HIGH.
  • IMF: Ukraine will receive half a billion dollars from the IMF. Confidence: HIGH.
• Support for Russia:
  • North Korea: Russia's cultural cooperation plan with North Korea indicates deepening ties. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Iran: Iran's summoning of Ukrainian charge d'affaires over "support for aggression" against the republic suggests alignment with Russia's narrative. Confidence: HIGH.
  • China: Russia's sharply increased metal exports to China indicate growing economic support. Confidence: HIGH.
• Shifting Alliances/Tensions:
  • Azerbaijan-Russia: Rapidly escalating diplomatic and intelligence tensions. Confidence: HIGH.
  • Armenia-EU: Armenia initiating discussions with EU on defense cooperation indicates a potential shift away from Russia's orbit. Confidence: HIGH.
  • NEW: TASS reports Trump announced the launch of a perfume, "Trump Victory." This is a non-military, soft power development that has no direct impact on the conflict. Confidence: HIGH.

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (Future Operations)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA)

• Donbas (Pokrovsk-Toretsk-Chasiv Yar): RUF will maintain its primary offensive effort, conducting persistent, high-intensity assaults with combined arms. The objective remains to advance towards Pokrovsk (Krasnoarmiisk), solidify control over the axis, and continue to press on Toretsk and Chasiv Yar, focusing on consolidating gains within the Kanal microdistrict. Continued KAB/KAR launches into Donetsk Oblast. Confidence: HIGH.
• Deep Strikes: RUF will continue to launch massed missile and Shahed UAV attacks targeting Ukrainian critical infrastructure, military administrative centers, and major urban areas. Expect continued adaptive tactics in drone employment and increased use of precision-guided munitions. Ballistic missile threats will likely continue against southern regions. Continued KAB/KAR launches into Kharkiv Oblast. Confidence: HIGH.
• Kharkiv/Sumy Border: RUF will likely continue ground probes and limited assaults along the border to fix Ukrainian forces and expand the "buffer zone," maintaining artillery and air pressure. Confidence: HIGH.
• Electronic Warfare: Continued and possibly increased deployment of EW systems to degrade UAF C2 and drone operations. Confidence: HIGH.
• Information Operations: RUF will sustain a multi-faceted IO campaign, focusing on: (1) amplifying UAF losses and internal issues; (2) discrediting Western support; (3) promoting narratives of Russian strength and justification for the war; and (4) exploiting international tensions. Confidence: HIGH. NEW: Expect increased messaging around national veterans' day. Confidence: HIGH.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA)

• Zaporizhzhia Offensive: RUF commits a significant operational reserve, including the newly transferred Kadyrovite units, to launch a large-scale, concentrated offensive on the Zaporizhzhia front, aiming for a deep breakthrough or to isolate/encircle key UAF defensive lines, potentially threatening major urban centers. Confidence: MEDIUM.
• Expanded Combined Arms Breakthrough (Donbas): RUF achieves a decisive operational breakthrough on the Pokrovsk axis, leveraging massed combined arms and novel systems to collapse UAF defensive lines and rapidly advance towards key strategic objectives. Confidence: MEDIUM.
• Strategic Deception Operation (Kharkiv/Sumy): The current limited offensive in Kharkiv/Sumy is revealed as a large-scale deception operation, designed to draw and fix UAF strategic reserves, while the true main effort is launched with overwhelming force. Confidence: LOW.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points

• Immediate (Next 24-48 hours):
  • Continued high-intensity combat on the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes, with RUF prioritizing consolidation and clearance of Kanal microdistrict in Chasiv Yar. Decision point for UAF on deployment of tactical reserves.
  • Ongoing deep strikes across Ukraine, particularly with renewed ballistic missile threats against Mykolaiv and persistent drone threats against Sumy, Kharkiv, and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts. Decision point for UAF on activation of additional AD assets/reserves.
  • Monitoring of Kadyrovite deployment in Zaporizhzhia for signs of large-scale offensive preparations. Decision point for UAF on pre-positioning reserves.
  • Monitoring of RUF use of motorcycles and UGVs for immediate counter-tactics development.
  • Immediate monitoring of Novopavlivka direction for RUF activity.
  • Continued monitoring of Russia-Azerbaijan diplomatic and intelligence tensions.
  • Continued monitoring of RUF's response to the confirmed damage to 5 Su-34 jets at the Volgograd airfield.
  • Increased KAB/KAR launches into Donetsk and Kharkiv Oblasts require immediate assessment of target areas and UAF AD response.
  • Monitor the situation in Dachne, Dnipropetropavsk Oblast, following RUF claims of "liberation."
  • Monitor for further UAF strikes on Donetsk and RUF's response.
  • Monitor the impact of weather conditions on RUF air operations and ground mobility.
  • Monitor for further details and casualties from the RUF attack in Zaporizhzhia.
  • Monitor RUF claims of destroying UAF equipment (e.g., anti-aircraft trucks).
• Short-term (Next 72-96 hours):
  • Assessment of RUF's ability to sustain current offensive tempo in Donetsk.
  • Evaluation of the effectiveness of new RUF tactical adaptations.
  • Continued monitoring of Russian second-echelon forces in Belgorod.
  • Evaluation of the domestic and international impact of RUF's escalated IO against Azerbaijan.
  • Observe public reaction and any potential unrest in Russia due to economic issues.
  • Monitor Iran-Ukraine diplomatic relations following the protest note.
• Mid-term (Next 1-2 weeks):
  • Evaluation of the impact of deep strikes on Ukrainian critical infrastructure.
  • Assessment of international diplomatic developments, particularly the Azerbaijan-Russia tension.
  • Observation of RUF force generation and replenishment rates.
  • Initial assessment of the effectiveness of UAF drone interceptor technologies.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS AND COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• Intelligence Gap 1: RUF Second Echelon (Kharkiv/Sumy).
  • Requirement: Confirm the composition, strength, and disposition of Russian operational reserves in Belgorod Oblast and adjacent areas.
  • Collection Methods: SIGINT (communications intercepts), IMINT (satellite imagery analysis of staging areas, railway hubs), OSINT (monitoring Russian military social media, local reports).
• Intelligence Gap 2: Specifics of New RUF UAVs and Anti-Drone Systems.
  • Requirement: Characterize the capabilities, operational patterns, and production rates of new RUF drone types. Validate claims and characterize effectiveness of alleged new RUF anti-drone "combat beam" systems.
  • Collection Methods: TECHINT (analysis of captured drones/debris), SIGINT (monitoring drone control frequencies), MASINT (radar signatures), OSINT (analysis of RUF drone communities, propaganda videos).
• Intelligence Gap 3: Scale of Kadyrovite Deployment and Intent in Zaporizhzhia.
  • Requirement: Confirm the precise numbers, equipment, and tactical intent of Kadyrovite and other RUF forces transferring to the Zaporizhzhia axis.
  • Collection Methods: HUMINT (source reporting), SIGINT (monitoring communications), IMINT (satellite imagery of troop movements, staging areas).
• Intelligence Gap 4: Effectiveness of UAF Fortifications in Kharkiv.
  • Requirement: Assess the performance of newly constructed UAF defensive lines under sustained RUF combined-arms assault in Kharkiv Oblast.
  • Collection Methods: IMINT (drone footage, satellite imagery), HUMINT (battlefield reports), SIGINT (enemy BDA reports).
• Intelligence Gap 5: Impact of Internal Corruption on RUF Fortifications.
  • Requirement: Quantify the extent to which corruption has impacted the quality and effectiveness of RUF defensive fortifications.
  • Collection Methods: HUMINT (source reporting), OSINT (investigative journalism), IMINT (comparative analysis).
• Intelligence Gap 6: Details of RUF "Shahed" Tactical Adaptation and UAF Interceptor Breakthroughs.
  • Requirement: Understand the specific changes in RUF Shahed tactics. Assess the technical specifications and scalability of the reported UAF interceptor breakthroughs.
  • Collection Methods: TECHINT (analysis of AD engagements), SIGINT (monitoring RUF flight control data), OSINT (AD specialist commentary).
• Intelligence Gap 7: RUF EW System Locations and Capabilities in Chasiv Yar.
  • Requirement: Identify precise locations and detailed capabilities of key Russian EW systems impacting Ukrainian C2 and ISR in the Chasiv Yar sector.
  • Collection Methods: SIGINT (EW signal analysis), MASINT (spectral analysis), HUMINT (battlefield reports), OSINT (RUF propaganda).
• Intelligence Gap 8: Veracity and Impact of Ceasefire Calls.
  • Requirement: Verify the authenticity and prevalence of Ukrainian officials privately calling for a ceasefire. Assess internal and external implications.
  • Collection Methods: HUMINT (diplomatic and political sources), OSINT (monitoring international media).
• Intelligence Gap 9: Tactical Details of RUF "Krasnopol" Strikes and Effectiveness.
  • Requirement: Assess the frequency, accuracy, and BDA of RUF "Krasnopol" guided artillery shell strikes.
  • Collection Methods: IMINT (drone footage), HUMINT (UAF frontline reports), SIGINT (enemy fire control intercepts).
• Intelligence Gap 10: Extent of Russian Internal Dissent and its Impact.
  • Requirement: Assess the scale, organization, and potential impact of internal dissent within Russia on force generation and morale.
  • Collection Methods: OSINT (monitoring Russian social media, independent media), HUMINT (emigrant networks).
• Intelligence Gap 11: Impact of UAF strike on Volgograd airfield.
  • Requirement: Conduct BDA to confirm the extent of damage to Su-34 aircraft at Volgograd airfield and assess its impact on RUF air operations.
  • Collection Methods: IMINT (satellite imagery), OSINT (monitoring RUF media).
• Intelligence Gap 12: RUF claims on Dachne (Dnipro Oblast).
  • Requirement: Verify the accuracy of RUF claims of liberating Dachne, Dnipropetropavsk Oblast, and the extent of their control.
  • Collection Methods: IMINT (satellite imagery, drone reconnaissance), HUMINT (local reports).
• Intelligence Gap 13: UAF Strike on Donetsk.
  • Requirement: Conduct BDA to confirm the target and damage caused by the UAF missile strike on Donetsk.
  • Collection Methods: IMINT (satellite imagery, local photography/video), OSINT (local reports, RUF media).
• Intelligence Gap 14: UAF Strike on Luhansk.
  • Requirement: Conduct BDA to confirm the target and extent of damage caused by the UAF drone attack on Luhansk.
  • Collection Methods: IMINT (satellite imagery, local photography/video), OSINT (local reports, RUF media).
• Intelligence Gap 15: Impact of Telegram Outages in Russia.
  • Requirement: Assess the cause, duration, and geographic scope of the Telegram outages in Russia.
  • Collection Methods: OSINT (monitoring Russian news, user reports), SIGINT (monitoring internet traffic anomalies).
• Intelligence Gap 16: Maritime Threats to Russian-linked Shipping.
  • Requirement: Investigate the explosion of the tanker near Libya and any other reported incidents involving Russian-linked civilian vessels.
  • Collection Methods: OSINT (maritime news, shipping tracking data), HUMINT (shipping industry contacts).
• Intelligence Gap 17: Russian Claims about Ukrainian Volunteer Equipment.
  • Requirement: Investigate the veracity of Russian claims that Ukrainian volunteers are purchasing expensive and unnecessary equipment for the AFU.
  • Collection Methods: OSINT (monitoring Ukrainian volunteer fundraising), HUMINT (interviews).
• Intelligence Gap 18: Specifics on Russian pension benefits for work in Ukraine.
  • Requirement: Understand the exact eligibility criteria and implementation details.
  • Collection Methods: OSINT (analysis of Russian government decrees, local media).
• Intelligence Gap 19: RUF's creation of verified lists of political prisoners in Ukraine.
  • Requirement: Identify the specific organizations or individuals within RUF responsible for creating these lists.
  • Collection Methods: OSINT (monitoring Russian state media, human rights reports), HUMINT (information from affected individuals).
• Intelligence Gap 20: Return of Ukrainian teenagers from occupied territories.
  • Requirement: Gather details on the specific circumstances and organizations involved.
  • Collection Methods: OSINT (monitoring Ukrainian government reports, humanitarian organizations).
• Intelligence Gap 21: BDA for new RUF strike in Zaporizhzhia.
  • Requirement: Conduct BDA to confirm the target and extent of damage from the new RUF attack in Zaporizhzhia.
  • Collection Methods: IMINT (satellite imagery, local photography/video), OSINT (local reports, UAF statements).
• Intelligence Gap 22: Details on civilian casualties in Plekhovo, Kursk Oblast.
  • Requirement: Verify the specific details and circumstances of alleged civilian injuries.
  • Collection Methods: OSINT (local media, social media, human rights reports), IMINT (if available), HUMINT (local sources).
• NEW Intelligence Gap 23: BDA for RUF Destruction of UAF Anti-Aircraft Truck.
  • Requirement: Verify the specific type of UAF anti-aircraft gun and truck destroyed, the location of the engagement, and the extent of damage.
  • Collection Methods: IMINT (detailed analysis of drone footage), OSINT (cross-referencing with UAF equipment lists, terrain analysis), TECHINT (if debris analysis possible).

---

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Immediate Defensive Reinforcement and Fire Support (Pokrovsk/Toretsk/Chasiv Yar): Allocate additional artillery and counter-battery radar assets to the Pokrovsk and Toretsk axes. Prioritize resupply of UAF units currently repelling high-intensity assaults. Immediately reinforce defensive positions on the western bank of the Siverskyi Donets-Donbas canal in Chasiv Yar to establish a firm line of defense. Prioritize ISR assets to identify and target high-value Russian assets, specifically TOS-1A systems and glide bomb release points around Chasiv Yar. Develop and implement immediate counter-tactics for RUF motorcycle and UGV assaults. Rationale: UAF General Staff confirms high assault rates and heavy fighting; immediate fire support and defensive reinforcement are critical to prevent RUF breakthroughs. New RUF tactics require rapid UAF adaptation.
2. Adaptive Air Defense Posture: Deploy mobile short-range air defense systems to protect key military administrative centers and logistics hubs in rear areas, particularly in Dnipropetropavsk, Kirovohrad, and Zaporizhzhia Oblasts, to counter RUF's pattern of targeting TCCs and other critical infrastructure. Prioritize training for UAF AD crews on new RUF Shahed tactics. Accelerate research and development into mass production and deployment of new interceptor technologies. Rationale: RUF demonstrates consistent intent to hit rear-area targets. New Shahed tactics demand AD adaptation, and scaling new interceptors is a long-term solution. New fire in Zaporizhzhia underscores ongoing threat to civilian areas.
3. Counter-UAV/Anti-UAV and EW Measures (Siversk/Kharkiv/Sumy/Chasiv Yar/Zaporizhzhia/Donetsk): Immediately supply additional FPV drone assets, counter-drone, and mobile EW systems to UAF units in the Siversk, Kharkiv, Sumy, Chasiv Yar, Zaporizhzhia, and Donetsk sectors. Prioritize deploying mobile friendly EW teams to the Chasiv Yar sector to actively identify, locate, and counter Russian drone reconnaissance and C2 nodes. Intensify efforts to understand and counter alleged new RUF anti-drone "combat beam" systems and their kinetic anti-drone capabilities. Rationale: RUF's adaptation to overwhelming UAF with drones and pervasive EW requires an immediate counter-response. Persistent drone threats against Sumy, Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Donetsk require immediate counter-measures.
4. ISR Prioritization (Zaporizhzhia/Belgorod/Maritime/Novopavlivka/Volgograd/Crimea/Dachne/Donetsk/Luhansk/Plekhovo): Re-task high-value ISR assets (SIGINT, IMINT) to intensively monitor the Zaporizhzhia axis for signs of a large-scale RUF offensive build-up involving Kadyrovite units. Simultaneously, maintain ISR focus on RUF second-echelon forces in Belgorod Oblast. Increase maritime surveillance in the Black and Caspian Seas to monitor threats to shipping. Maintain high vigilance on the Novopavlivka direction. Continue BDA on the Volgograd airfield strike. Prioritize ISR on Crimea and Sevastopol. Prioritize verifying RUF claims of "liberation" in Dachne, Dnipropetropavsk Oblast. Conduct thorough BDA on the UAF strike in Donetsk and Yasynuvata. Conduct thorough BDA on the UAF drone attack on Luhansk. Investigate the new fire in Zaporizhzhia for targeting patterns and BDA. Investigate allegations of civilian casualties in Plekhovo, Kursk Oblast. Rationale: Early warning of a major MDCOA offensive is paramount. Maritime threats require monitoring. UAF deep strikes require follow-up BDA. New claimed territorial gains and confirmed strikes necessitate immediate verification. Allegations of civilian casualties require rapid investigation.
5. Information Operations Counter-Narrative: Develop and disseminate robust counter-narratives to RUF's escalating IO against Azerbaijan and other regional partners, emphasizing Russia's aggressive tactics. Actively highlight internal Russian dissent and corruption. Proactively address narratives of Ukrainian fatigue or calls for ceasefire, reinforcing UAF resolve. Publicly refute false narratives about UAF casualties and forced mobilization. Highlight continued international support and the UN's finding on Olenivka. Actively counter any misleading RUF reports about UAF military units. Prepare messaging to address Russian Telegram outages. Highlight the successful return of Ukrainian children from occupied territories. Swiftly and transparently investigate allegations of UAF-caused civilian casualties in border regions. Rationale: RUF's aggressive IO aims to isolate Ukraine. Countering this is crucial for maintaining international support. Internal narratives must be managed to maintain morale and national unity.
6. Enhance Cross-Border Defense: Strengthen UAF defensive lines and fire planning along the Sumy/Kharkiv border, including pre-planned counter-battery fire missions, to deter RUF ground probes and limit incursions. Actively counter RUF KAB/KAR launches into Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts through enhanced AD and counter-air operations. Rationale: RUF maintains the capability and intent for cross-border incursions. Persistent aerial bombardment requires proactive AD and counter-air measures.
7. Monitor Crimean Bridge Traffic: Closely monitor traffic volume and types of vehicles crossing the Crimean Bridge for any unusual increases that could indicate heightened military or logistical activity. Rationale: Increased traffic on this critical logistical artery could signal RUF preparations for operations in southern Ukraine.