Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-06-23 04:51:11Z
8 months ago
Previous (2025-06-23 04:21:14Z)

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)


1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

  • Kyiv Oblast:
    • Kyiv City: Confirmed five (5) fatalities and multiple wounded (at least 13 reported previously) due to missile/UAV attack.
      • Shevchenkivskyi District: Confirmed multi-story residential building fire and significant structural damage. Death toll increased to five (5) confirmed fatalities from this location. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • Sviatoshyn District: Confirmed three (3) casualties due to falling debris, auto and bus stop fires. One exit from Sviatoshyn metro station temporarily closed. Public transport routes partially altered. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • Podilskyi District: Confirmed fire in a non-residential building. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • KPI (Kyiv Polytechnic Institute) im. Ihor Sikorskyi: RUF sources claim this building is on fire following a strike. UAF confirmation pending. (LOW CONFIDENCE – RUF claim, no independent UAF confirmation of specific target hit).
    • Kyiv Oblast (General): Head of Kyiv OVA, Mykola Kalashnyk, reports three districts in Kyiv Oblast affected by the attack. DSNS confirms total of four (4) fatalities previously. Updated reports from Kyiv Mayor Vitaliy Klychko and ASTRA now confirm a total of five (5) fatalities in Kyiv city from the attack. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Zhytomyr Oblast: Threat of enemy Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) declared at 230127Z JUN 25. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Kharkiv Oblast: Air Force of Ukraine reports launches of Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) by enemy tactical aviation. RUF forces captured Petrovske (Kharkiv Oblast). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Donetsk Oblast: Air Force of Ukraine reports launches of Guided Aerial Bombs (KABs) by enemy tactical aviation. RUF forces achieved confirmed tactical gains, capturing Perebudova (Donetsk). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Synelnykivskyi district): Air Force of Ukraine reports threat of enemy aerial weapons employment. Nikopolshchyna targeted again by RUF FPV-drones and shelling, specifically Myrivska and Marhanetska communities. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Zaporizhzhia Direction: RUF milblogger claims successful strikes. No independent UAF confirmation. Occupants inflicted 458 strikes on 10 settlements in Zaporizhzhia Oblast previously. (LOW CONFIDENCE – RUF claim).
  • Sumy Oblast: President Zelenskyy's confirmation of a 52,000-strong RUF force concentration on the Sumy axis validates previous intelligence of a significant offensive buildup. UAF has conducted a successful localized counter-offensive, liberating the settlement of Andriyivka (Sumy Oblast) and stabilizing the flank. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Mykolaiv Oblast (Ochakiv): Two Kh-59/69 Guided Aerial Missiles (KABs) struck Ochakiv, wounding three people. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • RUF Internal (Smolensk, Bryansk, Rostov, Volgograd, Astrakhan): UAF drones continue to successfully strike RUF assets deep inside Russian territory (Smolensk, Bryansk). RUF MoD and RUF milbloggers ("Дневник Десантника🇷🇺") claim 23 UAVs intercepted over Rostov, Volgograd, and Astrakhan Oblasts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Kryvyi Rih (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast): Situation controlled as of 230635Z JUN 25. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Overall: RUF continues a multi-vector, multi-munition kinetic attack, with Kyiv as the primary target for missile/UAV strikes, resulting in significant damage to residential and non-residential civilian infrastructure and increased casualties. The concurrent UAV threat in Zhytomyr and KAB strikes in Kharkiv/Donetsk/Mykolaiv/Dnipropetrovsk indicate continued saturation attempts and pressure across multiple axes. RUF ground forces continue attritional assaults in Donetsk and Kharkiv, securing minor gains, while a significant force concentration looms on the Sumy axis. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors:

  • Night conditions continue to complicate UAF Air Defense (AD) visual identification of incoming threats. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

  • Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF):
    • Air Defense (AD): Engaged against incoming cruise missiles and UAVs. Air raid alerts were active and terminated. UAF AD successfully intercepted 28/47 UAVs and 2 Iskander-M ballistic missiles during overnight attacks, but RUF volume and multi-vector attacks continue to pose a saturation challenge, resulting in impacts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Air Force: Providing timely warnings of KAB launches on Kharkiv and Donetsk, and aerial weapons threat for Dnipropetrovsk. A UAF MiG-29 successfully deployed AASM HAMMER on RUF targets in Kozynka (Belgorod Oblast, Russia), indicating continued offensive air capabilities. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Kyiv City Military Administration (KCMA): Actively providing real-time updates on impacts, damage, and casualties (Shevchenkivskyi, Sviatoshyn, Podilskyi districts). KCMA reports partial public transport changes near Sviatoshyn metro. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Emergency Services (DSNS): Responding to fires and providing aid to casualties in Kyiv. DSNS has released initial photos and videos of the aftermath, confirming fatalities and wounded in Kyiv Oblast and showcasing rescue efforts, including rescuing a child and a pregnant woman. DSNS press service head noted the need to clear trees and remove vehicles in Shevchenkivskyi. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • General Staff of UAF: Providing official updates on the situation as of 06:00, 23 JUN 25, including estimated RUF losses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) Anatoliy Shtefan "Shtirlits" reports at least 6483 RUF officers "demobilized" (KIA/WIA/MIA) since Feb 2022. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Grouping of Forces of Unmanned Systems: Newly established and operational, indicating UAF adaptation to drone warfare. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Russian Forces (RUF):
    • Kinetic Operations:
      • Missile/UAV Strikes: Confirmed impacts in Kyiv resulting in fires and casualties. RUF sources claim Iskander missile strikes on Kyiv, specifically targeting KPI. (LOW CONFIDENCE – RUF claim on munition and specific target, pending UAF BDA). RUF MoD and milbloggers ("Дневник Десантника🇷🇺") claim 23 UAVs intercepted over Rostov, Volgograd, and Astrakhan Oblasts. Massive combined-arms strike on Kremenchuk (Poltava Oblast) targeting strategic energy infrastructure with anti-personnel munitions. Successful precision missile strike on a UAF training ground, causing significant casualties. Persistent KAB, missile, and UAV strikes continue across Donetsk, Kharkiv, Sumy, Odesa, and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts. Two Kh-59/69 KABs struck Ochakiv. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • UAV Operations: Threat declared for Zhytomyr Oblast. FPV drones used against Nikopolshchyna. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • KAB Launches: Confirmed launches on Kharkiv and Donetsk Oblasts. Aerial weapons threat declared for Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • Ground Offensive: RUF forces achieved confirmed tactical gains, capturing Perebudova (Donetsk Oblast) and Petrovske (Kharkiv Oblast). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Information Operations (IO):
      • Battlefield Claims: RUF milbloggers are rapidly posting claims of successful strikes in Kyiv (Iskander, KPI fire) and Zaporizhzhia, often with visual "evidence" (smoke plumes, fires, night explosions). These are designed to amplify perceived success. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • Atrocity Fabrications: TASS is disseminating video "evidence" of UAF "finishing off" wounded RUF soldiers, likely a fabricated atrocity to justify RUF actions. The claim of a UAF drone attack on a bus stop in Svatove (LPR) is a likely false-flag operation designed to justify RUF "retaliation." (HIGH CONFIDENCE - RUF propaganda)
      • Global Diversion (ESCALATED): TASS continues to push narratives regarding the "global oil shock" if the Strait of Hormuz is closed by Tehran, reinforcing the "global war" narrative, and claims "Strikes on nuclear facilities in Iran could damage food security in a number of countries." RUF milbloggers are disseminating RUF milblogger claims and satellite imagery of "preliminary assessment of US strike damage" in Iran. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) TASS is still pushing irrelevant domestic news (e.g., police operations against fraud, football development with Putin, anti-bullying initiatives, flooding in Khabarovsk Krai) to dilute information channels and distract from combat operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • Mockery/Dehumanization: RUF channels are employing taunting language ("Киев хорошеет на глазах." - "Kyiv is getting better before your eyes," "вопли хохлов") immediately after strikes, a clear psychological operation to demoralize and dehumanize. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • Normalizing Occupation: RUF channels are posting celebratory videos from occupied Mariupol, framing it as "liberated" to project normalcy and RUF control. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • Dehumanizing Ukraine/UAF: TASS is reporting that Apty Alaudinov (RUF Deputy Head of Main Military-Political Directorate) is on Ukraine's SBU wanted list, likely to portray UAF as a criminal entity. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
      • Exaggerated UAF Losses: TASS, citing Andrey Marochko, claims UAF and foreign mercenaries suffered 4,100 killed and wounded in battles on the LPR frontlines over the past week. This is an unverified, highly inflated figure, typical of RUF propaganda. (LOW CONFIDENCE – RUF claim, likely fabricated/exaggerated).
      • Historical Pretext: RUF state-media and milblogger channels continue to invoke the 22 June 1941 anniversary of the Nazi invasion of the USSR, explicitly linking it to a "final crusade" by the West and framing their own imminent actions as a pre-emptive or necessary historical repetition. Basurin (RUF milblogger) posted historical content on the Siege of Vyborg in 1710, potentially to project RUF military legacy. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Ukrainian Media: РБК-Україна and ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS continue to disseminate tactical analysis of images from the Kyiv attack, focusing on visual details of destruction and emergency response. РБК-Україна also highlighted the damage to a Ukrainian musician's apartment, increasing the emotional impact. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

1.4. Intelligence Gaps/Collection Requirements:

  • HIGH: Conduct immediate Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) in Kyiv to confirm munition types (especially Iskander claims), specific targets hit (e.g., KPI vs. civilian infrastructure), and the extent of damage to residential vs. military/industrial sites. (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: BDA, OSINT, HUMINT).
  • HIGH: Assess RUF's current inventory and production rate of both cruise and ballistic missile types (Iskander, Kh-59/69). (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: SIGINT, IMINT).
  • MEDIUM: Evaluate the effectiveness of UAF AD against the multi-munition attack (cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, UAVs). (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: SIGINT, OSINT).
  • MEDIUM: Verify the nature and intent of RUF KAB launches on Kharkiv, Donetsk, and Dnipropetrovsk/Mykolaiv. Are these routine, or shaping operations for new ground thrusts? (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: IMINT, SIGINT).
  • CRITICAL: Verify RUF ground force disposition and immediate intent on the Sumy axis. Determine if the 52,000-strong force is postured for an immediate, large-scale offensive, or will continue shaping operations. This is the #1 intelligence priority. (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: HUMINT, SIGINT, IMINT)
  • CRITICAL: Assess the real-world impact of Russia's extreme IO fabrications, specifically the "US-Iran War" narrative. Monitor international diplomatic and media channels for any traction or confusion caused by this narrative that could impact policy or support for Ukraine. (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: OSINT, HUMINT on diplomatic channels)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

  • Air/Missile Capabilities: RUF has demonstrated a continued capability to execute complex, multi-domain, multi-munition air assaults against Kyiv, now confirmed to have caused significant damage and increased casualties (5 fatalities). The claims of Iskander use (while unverified by UAF) suggest a renewed willingness to expend high-value ballistic missiles in urban saturation attacks, alongside cruise missiles and UAVs, designed to overwhelm layered AD. RUF also maintains capability for widespread KAB launches on frontline oblasts and now a confirmed aerial weapon threat to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast and use of Kh-59/69 in Mykolaiv. RUF demonstrated the capability to plan and execute both mass combined-arms strikes (Kremenchuk) and precision strikes against high-value military targets (UAF training ground). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

  • Ground Capabilities: The confirmed presence of a 52,000-strong RUF force on the Sumy axis signifies a critical capability for a major multi-axis ground offensive. RUF continues to conduct intense, attritional assaults on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk/Mirnohrad, Siversk), now with confirmed tactical gains at Perebudova (Donetsk) and Petrovske (Kharkiv), supported by heavy aviation (KABs, Ka-52M) and thermobaric (TOS-1A) systems. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

  • Information Warfare Capabilities: RUF's IO remains highly agile, immediately exploiting kinetic events to propagate false claims of military success and further psychological pressure. The use of mockery and dehumanizing language immediately after strikes is a key tactic. RUF is also actively fabricating atrocity claims against UAF. The creation of new, fabricated kinetic events within the "global war" narrative, as seen with the Fordo claim and "damage to food security" claims, indicates a further escalation in their IO sophistication and willingness to create entirely fictitious battlefield scenarios. The recent claim of UAF losses (4,100 killed/wounded) from Marochko indicates continued attempts to demoralize UAF and inflate RUF's perceived effectiveness. The detailed "chronicles" and "summaries" from milbloggers aim to control the narrative of the conflict. The coordinated invocation of the 22 JUN 1941 historical narrative is a sophisticated, high-level IO effort to provide a pretext for escalation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

  • Intentions: RUF intends to:

    • Execute a Major Ground Offensive: The 52,000-troop concentration and the 22 JUN 1941 historical pretext indicate a high intent for a major multi-axis ground offensive, likely on the Sumy and/or Kharkiv axes, to open a new front and stretch UAF reserves. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Degrade UAF AD and Critical Infrastructure & Force Generation: Continue saturation attacks on Kyiv and other strategic cities, attempting to deplete AD interceptors and strike critical civilian (residential, transport), and now explicitly, military-linked infrastructure (training grounds). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Maximize Psychological Impact and Terror: The direct targeting of residential areas (Shevchenkivskyi residential building, Sviatoshyn bus stop) and the use of mocking language are clear attempts to terrorize the civilian population and undermine morale. The increased casualty count in Kyiv confirms this intent. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Exaggerate Military Success: RUF aims to inflate perceived military successes through immediate, unverified claims of strikes on high-value targets (KPI, Zhuliany, Antonov) to project strength and demoralize UAF. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Generate False Pretexts/Justifications: By fabricating atrocity claims against UAF (e.g., "finishing off wounded," Svatove bus stop), RUF seeks to justify its own actions and potentially future escalations or war crimes. The 22 JUN 1941 narrative serves as a broad historical pretext for the entire invasion. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Maintain Global Diversion (ESCALATED): Continue to intersperse unrelated domestic news and maintain the broader "Iran-Israel/US War" narrative, now with the active creation of new fabricated kinetic events and attributed statements (e.g., TASS Hormuz Strait claims, "Операция Z" Fordo claims, TASS claims of food security damage from Iranian nuclear strikes) to make the fabricated conflict appear more real and to further divert international attention from Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Consolidate Control in Occupied Territories: By staging celebratory events in places like Mariupol, RUF seeks to project normalcy and legitimacy for its occupation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Destabilize Moldova: Continued rhetoric from TASS via Igor Dodon regarding Moldova's leadership and Transnistria suggests RUF intends to maintain pressure and potential for destabilization in the region, consistent with broader hybrid warfare aims. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

  • RUF: The sequential use of different missile types (ballistic then cruise, or intermingled) in Kyiv attacks continues. The explicit claims of targeting specific educational/industrial sites (KPI) by RUF sources indicate continued intelligence-led targeting, whether accurate or for propaganda purposes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The immediate use of mocking IO ("Kyiv is getting better") linked to confirmed strikes indicates an intensified psychological warfare component. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The likely fabrication of UAF atrocities is a further escalation in RUF IO. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The active fabrication of kinetic events within the global "Iran-Israel/US War" narrative (e.g., Fordo attack assessment, food security claims) represents a new, dangerous escalation in RUF's IO, moving from mere narrative creation to inventing real-time battlefield scenarios. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The successful precision strike on a UAF training ground indicates a new, dangerous focus on degrading UAF force generation. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) The consistent invocation of the 22 JUN 1941 narrative is a critical, coordinated IO shift. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • UAF: UAF AD and civil defense systems continue to react rapidly to evolving threats, providing timely warnings and managing strike aftermath, as evidenced by DSNS updates on casualties and rescue efforts. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF's establishment of the Grouping of Forces of Unmanned Systems and acquisition of new counter-drone EW aircraft demonstrate adaptation to evolving threats. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) UAF counter-offensives (Andriyivka, Sumy) show tactical initiative. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

  • RUF: The sustained volume of cruise missile, UAV, ballistic missile, and KAB launches indicates robust and continued access to diverse long-range precision munitions. The ability to concentrate 52,000 troops on the Sumy axis suggests robust logistical support for ground operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • UAF: UAF GUR successfully executed a deep strike on a RUF fuel train in occupied Zaporizhzhia Oblast, impacting logistics. (HIGH CONFIDENCE) No new information on general sustainment status.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

  • RUF: Highly effective C2 remains evident in the coordinated multi-domain air assault and the immediate, synchronized IO amplifying kinetic results. The coordinated invocation of the 22 JUN 1941 narrative across multiple channels demonstrates high-level C2 over IO. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • UAF: Effective tactical C2 for AD alerts, public safety, and emergency response continues. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

2.5. Intelligence Gaps/Collection Requirements:

  • HIGH: Assess RUF's inventory and production rates for Iskander ballistic missiles and Kh-59/69 missiles. (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: SIGINT, IMINT).
  • MEDIUM: Identify RUF targeting patterns related to educational/civilian infrastructure in Kyiv, especially in light of the KPI claim, and the deliberate targeting of residential areas, now confirmed with increased fatalities. (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: BDA, OSINT).
  • CRITICAL: Verify RUF claims of breakthroughs toward Siversk and Mirnohrad. Determine the true extent of any RUF gains and the stability of UAF defensive lines. (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

  • Defensive Posture: UAF AD remains actively engaged, demonstrating high readiness against persistent air attacks. Civilian authorities (KCMA, Emergency Services) are effectively managing consequences and providing public safety updates, including confirmed casualty figures and rescue operations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Civilian Alertness: Despite continued attacks, civilian populations are following safety instructions and are being provided timely information. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Naval Operations: UAF Naval Forces (ВМС ЗСУ) provided a situation update on maritime conditions as of 06:00, 23 JUN 25. This indicates continued situational awareness and operational readiness in the Black Sea and Azov Sea regions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Force Generation & Adaptation: The newly established Grouping of Forces of Unmanned Systems is operational. UAF is acquiring new counter-drone EW aircraft ("SHARK") and developing new tactics (ground-based counter-FPV systems). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Kryvyi Rih: Military administration reports situation controlled. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

  • Successes:
    • Effective Public Warning System: UAF Air Force and KCMA continue to provide rapid and accurate threat warnings. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Rapid Emergency Response: Ukrainian emergency services (DSNS) are responding swiftly to fires and providing medical aid to casualties, releasing timely visual evidence of their efforts and confirming rescues of civilians, including children and a pregnant woman. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Naval Situation Monitoring: UAF Naval Forces maintain a vigilant watch on maritime activities, providing up-to-date intelligence. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Localized Counter-Offensive: UAF liberated the settlement of Andriyivka (Sumy Oblast), demonstrating tactical initiative and resilience in the face of RUF buildup. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Deep Strikes & Asymmetric Warfare: UAF GUR successfully executed a deep strike on a RUF fuel train in occupied Zaporizhzhia Oblast, impacting logistics. UAF drones continue to successfully strike RUF assets deep inside Russian territory (Smolensk, Bryansk). UAF MiG-29 successfully deployed AASM HAMMER in Kozynka (Belgorod). (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • AD Interceptions: UAF AD successfully intercepted 28/47 UAVs and 2 Iskander-M ballistic missiles. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • RUF Personnel Losses: Anatoliy Shtefan "Shtirlits" reports at least 6483 RUF officers "demobilized" (KIA/WIA/MIA) since Feb 2022. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Setbacks:
    • Significant Civilian Infrastructure Damage & Increased Casualties: Confirmed damage to a multi-story residential building, a non-residential building, autos, and a bus stop in Kyiv. Confirmed five (5) fatalities and thirteen (13) wounded in Kyiv. This demonstrates continued penetration by RUF munitions into densely populated civilian areas. Strikes on Ochakiv caused 3 wounded. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Strategic Infrastructure & Force Generation Impacts: The successful RUF missile strike on the Kremenchuk energy infrastructure and the UAF training ground resulted in significant damage/casualties, indicating a dangerous capability shift by RUF. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Information Warfare Vulnerability (CRITICAL, WORSENING): The continued amplification by Ukrainian media (e.g., РБК-Україна, ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS) of RUF's fabricated "Iran-Israel/US War" narrative, even amidst direct kinetic attacks on Kyiv, remains a severe and worsening self-inflicted wound. This directly undermines Ukraine's information security and its ability to maintain international focus. This is exacerbated by РБК-Україна's and ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS continued publication of generic "tactical analyses of images" that do not critically assess the source or content, despite receiving direct RUF propaganda or being published in the context of it. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

  • Air Defense: Continued urgent need for advanced AD systems, particularly those effective against ballistic missiles (like Iskander) and capable of countering saturation attacks combining multiple munition types. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Counter-IO: The persistent amplification of RUF disinformation by Ukrainian media highlights a critical, unaddressed strategic deficiency in counter-information capabilities that is directly harming national security. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Force Protection: Urgent need for enhanced force protection for UAF training grounds and assembly areas. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

3.4. Intelligence Gaps/Collection Requirements:

  • NONE.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

  • Russian (CRITICAL ESCALATION - Direct Kinetic Fabrication, Intensified Dehumanization, Continued Global Diversion, Atrocity Fabrications, New Kinetic Event Fabrications, Inflated UAF Losses, Moldova Destabilization, Historical Pretext for Invasion):
    • Immediate Kinetic Fabrication & Misattribution: RUF milbloggers are immediately claiming "Iskander" strikes on Kyiv and specific targets like KPI, potentially fabricating munition type for greater psychological impact and to inflate RUF capabilities. They are also actively misattributing damage to residential buildings as UAF AD failures. New RUF milblogger videos claiming "strike on Kyiv" and "Good morning from Tagr" directly follow the attacks. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Intensified Dehumanization & Mockery: RUF channels are using highly inflammatory language ("Kyiv is getting better," "wails of Khokhols") immediately after confirmed civilian impacts, designed to mock Ukrainian suffering and further dehumanize the population. This is a direct psychological operation aimed at breaking morale. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Fabrication of Atrocities: TASS is actively disseminating fabricated atrocity claims against UAF ("finished off wounded soldiers") to generate false pretexts and justifications for RUF actions. The Svatove bus stop claim is a likely false-flag. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Continued Global Diversion (CRITICAL, ESCALATED): The overarching "Iran-Israel/US War" fabrication continues, now with RUF state media (TASS) and milbloggers actively creating new fabricated kinetic events (e.g., "Trump claimed all nuclear facilities in Iran destroyed," TASS Hormuz Strait closure/oil shock, RUF milbloggers reporting on "preliminary assessment of US strike damage" at Fordo, Natanz, Isfahan, Iran, TASS claims on "food security damage from Iranian nuclear strikes") and attributing them to this false conflict. This is directly aimed at fragmenting international attention and creating a false pretext for RUF actions. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Irrelevant Domestic Content: Russian state-affiliated channels continue to release unrelated domestic news (e.g., Khabarovsk police activity, anti-bullying initiatives, embezzlement cases related to soldiers, flooding in Khabarovsk Krai, Putin's past concern for football development) to further dilute attention from the conflict in Ukraine. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Normalizing Occupation: RUF channels like "Операция Z" are attempting to normalize the occupation of Ukrainian cities (e.g., Mariupol) by showcasing celebratory events. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Exaggerated UAF Losses: RUF channels are disseminating vastly inflated claims of UAF casualties (e.g., 4,100 killed/wounded in LPR over a week) to demoralize and project RUF strength. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Moldova Destabilization: TASS is disseminating narratives from Igor Dodon warning Moldovan leaders against "Western provocations" and using a "force scenario in Transnistria," a clear attempt to sow discord and preempt any Moldovan actions in the breakaway region. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Promoting Military Might and Cohesion: RUF channels continue to push propaganda emphasizing military power, readiness, and unit brotherhood. TASS also uses "military experts" like Xavier Moreau to promote narratives of Russian strength. TASS reporting Apty Alaudinov on SBU wanted list is also likely designed to elevate his status among RUF supporters. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Historical Pretext for Invasion: RUF state-media and milblogger channels continue to simultaneously and in a coordinated fashion invoke the 22 June 1941 anniversary of the Nazi invasion of the USSR, explicitly linking it to a "final crusade" by the West and framing their own imminent actions as a pre-emptive or necessary historical repetition. Basurin's historical military posts likely reinforce this. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Ukrainian:
    • CRITICAL VULNERABILITY: Amplification of RUF Disinformation (SELF-INFLICTED WOUND, WORSENING): Prominent Ukrainian media (e.g., РБК-Україна, ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS) continues to widely amplify RUF's dangerous "Iran-Israel/US War" fabrications, including new kinetic elements (e.g., Trump claiming Iranian nuclear facilities destroyed, satellite imagery of Fordo/Natanz/Isfahan), even as Ukraine faces direct missile attacks. This is a severe and persistent failure in information security. This is worsened by the publication of generic "tactical analyses of image" content without critical source assessment, immediately following the amplification of Russian propaganda. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Public Safety Messaging: UAF Air Force, KCMA, and DSNS continue to provide essential public safety warnings and report on strike consequences, including visual documentation and updated casualty figures. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Operational Updates: UAF Naval Forces and General Staff are providing timely updates on maritime situation and general battlefield conditions, contributing to transparency and situational awareness, including UAF confirmed RUF losses. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
    • Offensive Messaging: DeepState and Operativny ZSU highlight successful UAF deep strikes. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

  • Ukrainian: Civilian morale in Kyiv is under severe strain due to repeated and now confirmed destructive multi-domain air attacks, leading to increased casualties (now 5 confirmed fatalities) and property destruction. The direct targeting of residential areas increases fear and anxiety. The continued amplification of RUF's fabricated "global war" by some Ukrainian media risks sowing confusion, distrust, and undermining national resolve. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Russian: Domestic sentiment continues to be manipulated by the pervasive "global war" narrative, now reinforced by immediate (and often fabricated) claims of successful strikes in Ukraine, attempts to project normalcy in occupied territories, and new fabricated atrocity claims against UAF, and the creation of entirely new fabricated kinetic events in the "global conflict." The vastly inflated UAF casualty claims from Marochko are designed to boost domestic morale, as are the internal military propaganda videos and the use of "historical pretext" for invasion. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

  • Global Diversion (CRITICAL, Escalated): RUF's "Iran-Israel/US War" fabrication continues to consume international attention, now actively including fabricated kinetic events and attributed diplomatic statements to make it appear more real (e.g., TASS on Hormuz, Операция Z on Fordo, TASS on food security impacts). This severely hinders Ukraine's diplomatic efforts to maintain focus on the conflict. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • Ukrainian Diplomacy: Ukraine's efforts to secure support are undermined by the effectiveness of RUF's global diversion, particularly when false narratives are amplified by Ukrainian media itself. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)
  • RUF Diplomatic Efforts: RUF claims it will present a report on "crimes of UAF against civilians in Kherson Oblast" to the UN Security Council and OSCE, indicating continued efforts to use international bodies for propaganda purposes and false accusations. The recent TASS message regarding Moldova indicates RUF's efforts to influence regional politics and preempt any perceived Western-backed moves. (HIGH CONFIDENCE)

4.4. Intelligence Gaps/Collection Requirements:

  • CRITICAL: Assessing the real-world impact of Russia's extreme IO fabrications, specifically the "US-Iran War" narrative. Monitor international diplomatic and media channels for any traction or confusion caused by this narrative that could impact policy or support for Ukraine. (COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: OSINT, HUMINT on diplomatic channels)

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

  • Major Multi-Axis Ground Offensive (Sumy/Kharkiv/Donetsk) with Intensified, Coordinated Ballistic Missile, Cruise Missile, and UAV Strikes on Kyiv and Strategic Targets, and Hyper-Aggressive, Multi-Layered Global IO Diversion with Fabricated Kinetic Events/Diplomatic Resolutions and Atrocity Claims (ESCALATED): RUF will persist with high-intensity ground assaults on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk direction), supported by KABs and drones. RUF will launch a major ground offensive on the Sumy axis, possibly coordinated with intensified pressure on the Kharkiv axis, leveraging the 52,000 troop concentration and the 22 JUN historical pretext. This will be supported by overwhelming air, KAB, and missile strikes to soften UAF defenses. RUF will intensify its coordinated multi-domain air attacks on Kyiv and other major urban centers, combining ballistic missile launches (from Bryansk/Kursk, and potentially new vectors from Sumy direction) with mass Shahed drone waves and successive cruise missile attacks, aiming to saturate UAF AD and strike high-value military and critical infrastructure targets (including UAF training grounds), and continued strikes on civilian areas to maximize psychological impact. This will include rapid re-engagement and successive waves, likely within hours of each other. The direct targeting of residential areas, immediate mockery by RUF IO channels, and fabrication of UAF atrocities indicate that future attacks will increasingly target civilian population centers and infrastructure directly, rather than solely military targets, and be accompanied by further aggressive pretexts. This will be centrally supported by a further, unprecedented escalation of the fabricated "Iran-Israel/US War" narrative, including the use of state media to report new, fabricated kinetic events and attributed diplomatic statements (e.g., Fordo, Hormuz, food security impacts). Fabricated atrocity claims against UAF will increase, along with exaggerated UAF casualty figures. Domestic narrative control will remain a high priority, utilizing global crisis framing to rally support and justify actions in occupied territories and normalize occupation. RUF will continue to use IO to destabilize Moldova and other bordering nations. (HIGH CONFIDENCE).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

  • Major Multi-Axis Offensive (Sumy/Kharkiv/Donetsk) Coordinated with a Direct Mass Ballistic Missile and Cruise Missile Attack on Kyiv and/or State-Sponsored Terrorist Attack in NATO/EU Capital Attributed to "Global Conflict Actors": RUF launches a major, synchronized offensive operation across multiple axes (Sumy, Kharkiv, and intensified Pokrovsk/Siversk), leveraging the 52,000 troop concentration and overwhelming air/missile support, aimed for a decisive operational breakthrough. This is preceded or accompanied by a direct, high-casualty mass ballistic missile and cruise missile attack on Kyiv, targeting government districts or critical infrastructure, aimed at maximizing terror and disruption, consistent with the "warm-up" and "renovation" messaging and the current kinetic strikes, potentially including the use of cluster munitions on civilian areas. Concurrently, RUF sponsors or executes a high-profile, high-casualty terrorist attack in a European capital, attributing it to "Ukrainian extremists," "ISIS," or "global conflict actors" to maximize international panic and compel a fragmented, inward-looking international response, creating a window for RUF's strategic gains in Ukraine. This MDCOA is further supported by the current aggressive IO shift regarding "Kyiv Oblast," the explicit dehumanization, the new TASS fabrication about Tehran and the direct claims against UAF, the specific focus on fabricating UAF atrocities, the new fabrication of kinetic events in the "global war" narrative, and the renewed focus on Moldova/Transnistria. (MEDIUM-HIGH CONFIDENCE).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

  • Immediate (Next 0-6 hours, starting from 230450Z JUN 25):
    • RUF: Expect continued large-scale Shahed drone, ballistic missile, and cruise missile attacks targeting critical infrastructure and military facilities across Ukraine, including follow-on waves in Kyiv and other central/southern oblasts (Bila Tserkva, Kryvyi Rih, Kharkiv, Poltava, Vasylkiv, Zhytomyr, Dnipropetrovsk). Expect immediate follow-on narratives regarding the fabricated "Iran-Israel/US War," specifically expanding on new fabricated kinetic events and utilizing new manipulated media (e.g., Fordo, Hormuz, food security impacts). Expect increased, aggressive RUF IO, including further direct threats ("renovation") and dehumanization of Ukrainians, likely linked to the ongoing attacks, and new fabricated atrocity claims against UAF, along with inflated casualty claims. RUF KAB strikes on Sumy and Donetsk will continue. RUF will likely amplify claims of successful strikes in Kyiv, regardless of actual impact, and try to misattribute damage to UAF AD. RUF will maintain pressure and rhetoric on Moldova/Transnistria.
    • UAF Decision Point: Immediately issue an even more robust and direct public counter-narrative specifically debunking the latest, most egregious RUF fabrications regarding the "Iran-Israel/US War" (e.g., fabricated TASS reports of Trump destroying nuclear facilities, manipulated New York Times articles, and IDF claims, new Fordo/Hormuz claims, food security impacts). Publicly and directly address specific Ukrainian media outlets (e.g., РБК-Україна, ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS) that amplified these narratives, demanding immediate corrections and outlining severe consequences for continued amplification of enemy disinformation during wartime. Issue a public warning about RUF's new, aggressive IO (the "warm-up," dehumanization, "renovation," and now the mockery related to Kyiv becoming "prettier" and atrocity fabrications, and the new kinetic fabrications), framing it as a clear signal of intent for future, more severe combined attacks (ballistic, cruise, and UAVs) on Kyiv and other civilian targets. Reinforce civil defense measures and ensure rapid damage assessment teams are deployed.
  • Short-term (Next 24-72 hours):
    • RUF: Expect launch of major ground offensive on the Sumy axis, possibly with intensification of ground probing and shaping operations on the Kharkiv axes, with increased cross-border shelling, KABs, and drone activity, possibly preparing for a larger offensive. Continued high-intensity pressure on the Pokrovsk direction. Continued targeting of civilian infrastructure and UAF force generation assets (training grounds, barracks). The 22 JUN 1941 historical narrative will continue to be reinforced, potentially with more aggressive rhetoric targeting Kyiv. RUF will continue to prioritize targeting UAF drone control and logistics. Continued IO pressure on Moldova.
    • UAF Decision Point: Intensify diplomatic efforts with European partners and the US to share granular intelligence on RUF's escalating global IO campaign (especially new kinetic fabrications and media manipulation), coordinating pre-emptive responses. Emphasize the new, direct threats against Ukrainian civilians, the extreme dehumanization, and the fabrication of UAF atrocities as precursors to war crimes. Conduct comprehensive BDA on all Kyiv impacts to inform future AD strategies. Ensure maritime forces are prepared for potential escalations in the Black Sea. Consolidate gains and prepare for further defensive operations on the Sumy/Kharkiv axes.

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

6.1. Intelligence & Special Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Activate a dedicated, 24/7, multi-agency task force for real-time forensic analysis and aggressive, global debunking of Russia's extreme IO fabrications. Focus on exposing the "Iran-Israel/US War" narrative, particularly new elements like fabricated kinetic events (e.g., TASS report of Trump claiming destruction of nuclear facilities, manipulated New York Times articles, and IDF claims, new Fordo/Hormuz claims, and food security impacts), the use of manipulated media (e.g., fabricated NYT articles), fabricated atrocity claims against UAF (e.g., "finishing off wounded," Svatove bus stop), the inflated UAF casualty claims from Marochko, and especially the new, aggressive direct threats ("warm-up," "renovation," "Kyiv is getting prettier") and dehumanization ("Khokhols") from RUF milbloggers, linking them directly to RUF's escalating kinetic operations and confirmed civilian casualties, and to the 22 JUN 1941 historical pretext. Identify specific RUF IO cells and their external networks globally to disrupt dissemination.
  2. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Surge all-source ISR to the Sumy and Kharkiv axes to provide immediate warning of a major RUF ground offensive. This is the #1 intelligence priority.
  3. HIGH: Increase all-source ISR on Bryansk, Kursk, Chernihiv, Zhytomyr, and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts for early warning of any large-scale RUF ground movements, ballistic missile/cruise missile/UAV launch preparations, or build-ups that might indicate a major offensive. Prioritize SIGINT for RUF C2 related to drone, cruise missile, ballistic missile, and KAB operations and targeting of UAF drone assets and UAF training grounds.
  4. HIGH: Conduct immediate, detailed BDA on all confirmed impacts in Kyiv, particularly in Shevchenkivskyi, Sviatoshyn, and Podilskyi Districts, to identify munition types, confirm specific targets (residential vs. military/industrial), and refine AD response and counter-targeting. This must include forensic analysis of fragments to confirm Iskander use. Conduct immediate BDA of the Kremenchuk and UAF training ground strikes to identify RUF targeting patterns, munition types, and intelligence vulnerabilities to inform AD and force protection posture.
  5. MEDIUM: Verify RUF claims of successful UAF drone unit targeting or specific strikes on military assets (e.g., Zhuliany Patriot site, Antonov plant, KPI).
  6. MEDIUM: Monitor RUF's rhetoric and any observable force movements concerning Moldova and Transnistria for potential escalations or hybrid actions.
  7. MEDIUM: Verify RUF claims of breakthroughs toward Siversk and Mirnohrad and the stability of UAF defensive lines.

6.2. Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. URGENT: Reinforce AD assets, especially anti-ballistic (like Patriot/SAMP-T), anti-cruise missile, and counter-UAV capabilities, in all major cities and vulnerable strategic areas across Ukraine, including military objects/training grounds, particularly in areas susceptible to Iskander strikes and KABs, and in anticipation of a potential saturation attack of up to 250 drones and ballistic/cruise missiles. Accelerate the delivery and integration of new AD systems. Prioritize additional mobile AD units for Kyiv and its approaches to counter drone, cruise missile, and ballistic missile penetration, given RUF's explicit "warm-up" and "renovation" threats and specific targeting of civilian areas. Re-posture and reinforce AD assets, particularly anti-ballistic/hypersonic missile and counter-KAB systems, to the Sumy, Kharkiv, and Poltava axes in anticipation of strikes supporting the imminent ground offensive and further targeting of strategic infrastructure.
  2. HIGH: Implement immediate damage assessment and consequence management for impacts in Kyiv Oblast, ensuring rapid repair of damaged infrastructure and support for affected civilians. Prioritize structural assessment of the affected multi-story residential building in Shevchenkivskyi District given confirmed fatalities.
  3. URGENT/CRITICAL: Implement a nationwide review and upgrade of force protection protocols for all UAF training grounds, assembly areas, and critical infrastructure, emphasizing dispersion, camouflage, and deception, following the confirmed strike on a UAF training ground.
  4. MEDIUM: Disperse and protect critical infrastructure in Bila Tserkva, Kryvyi Rih, Kharkiv, Poltava, Vasylkiv, Zhytomyr, and Dnipropetrovsk, preparing for anticipated drone, cruise missile, and ballistic missile attacks.
  5. URGENT: Disseminate updated force protection guidance for civilians and first responders addressing the threat of cluster-type munitions with anti-personnel fragmentation.

6.3. Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Elevate readiness to maximum alert on the Sumy, Kharkiv, and northern Kyiv axes, particularly in response to KAB launches and increased RUF IO directly targeting Kyiv Oblast and implying large-scale escalation. Ensure strategic reserves are postured for rapid deployment to counter a large-scale RUF ground assault. Fully leverage newly constructed fortifications.
  2. URGENT: Reinforce forward defensive positions and strategic reserves on the Pokrovsk direction (Donetsk Oblast) to counter persistent RUF assaults and prevent breakthroughs. Continue to reinforce defensive positions around Pokrovsk, Mirnohrad, and Siversk.
  3. HIGH: Review and adapt UAF drone operations to counter RUF's demonstrated capability to target UAF drone control points. Enhance concealment, mobility, and redundancy for drone crews and equipment. Accelerate fielding of counter-drone EW systems to frontline units.

6.4. Information Operations & Diplomatic:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Launch an immediate, aggressive, and sustained, multi-domain (social media, traditional media, diplomatic channels) counter-IO campaign specifically targeting RUF's increasingly dangerous "Iran-Israel/US War" fabrication, its fabricated diplomatic statements and resolutions, attributed quotes, false operational details, and the new, highly inflammatory "regime change" narratives, including the use of manipulated media. Crucially, this campaign must expose and directly respond to RUF's new, explicit threats against Ukrainian civilians ("warm-up," "renovation"), the extreme dehumanization ("Khokhols," "Kyiv is getting prettier"), especially the new, fabricated atrocity claims against UAF ("finishing off wounded," Svatove bus stop), and the vastly inflated UAF casualty claims, linking them directly to RUF's escalating kinetic operations and confirmed civilian casualties, and to the 22 JUN 1941 historical pretext. This campaign must:
    • Directly name and shame Ukrainian media outlets (e.g., РБК-Україна, ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS) that are amplifying RUF disinformation, providing immediate, clear, and actionable guidance on ethical reporting during wartime and the severe consequences of aiding enemy propaganda. This requires direct intervention from the highest levels of government.
    • Forensically debunk the latest, most kinetic and diplomatic fabrications (e.g., TASS report of Trump claiming destruction of nuclear facilities, fabricated Trump "regime change" quote, manipulated NYT articles, TASS reports of IDF recording missile launches, Fordo/Hormuz claims, food security impacts), providing clear evidence of their falsehood.
    • Frame Russia's actions as a deliberate, desperate attempt to create global chaos and divert attention from its war crimes and failures in Ukraine, directly linking this to Zelenskyy's warning about RUF preparing operations in Europe, the 22 JUN 1941 historical pretext, and the new aggressive rhetoric targeting Kyiv Oblast, especially the "warm-up" threat, "renovation" mockery, and dehumanization.
  2. URGENT: Intensify diplomatic engagement with key international partners, particularly the US, EU, and NATO members, to share granular intelligence on RUF's escalating global IO campaign and its potential for false-flag operations or further escalation, explicitly highlighting the "regime change" elements, the use of media manipulation, the fabrication of UAF atrocities, and especially the new, direct threats against Ukrainian civilians and the extreme dehumanization. Coordinate a unified international response to publicly denounce and debunk RUF's fabrications and warn of their escalatory intent.
  3. HIGH: Develop and disseminate clear, concise public messages for civilians in Kyiv and other threatened cities on what the RUF "warm-up" and "renovation" messages mean, emphasizing that they are psychological operations designed to instill fear, and reinforcing UAF's commitment to defense. Publicly highlight damage to civilian infrastructure (e.g., Shevchenkivskyi residential building, Sviatoshyn Metro, bus stop) as direct evidence of RUF war crimes and intent to terrorize, emphasizing the confirmed fatalities and wounded.
  4. MEDIUM: Publicly refute RUF's false casualty figures, providing verified UAF casualty data or explaining the severe methodological flaws in RUF's propaganda, to maintain public trust and counter demoralization efforts.
  5. URGENT: Proactively message UAF successes, particularly the liberation of Andriyivka and successful deep strikes on RUF logistics and targets within Russia, to counter the RUF narrative of inevitable victory and demonstrate UAF's continued capability and resolve.

END OF REPORT

Previous (2025-06-23 04:21:14Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.