Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 18 JUN 25 / 10:59 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 18 JUN 25 / 10:29 ZULU - 18 JUN 25 / 10:59 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Kyiv Oblast: Confirmed civilian fatalities from recent missile strike remain at 26. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). No new reports from current period.
• Sumy Oblast: No new information from current period to confirm/deny Russian claims of Novonikolaevka liberation.
• Donetsk Oblast: No new significant ground activity reported in this period. Focus remains on Kupyansk, Lyman, Sieversk, Kramatorsk, Toretsk, and Pokrovsk directions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Kharkiv Oblast: No new information from current period to confirm/deny Russian claims of Dolgenkoye liberation. Russian milblogger "Два майора" released drone footage labeled "Русский город Харьков" implying continued reconnaissance/surveillance. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, Russian source, video quality degraded).
• Zaporizhzhia Oblast: Confirmed significant fires at a "industrial enterprise" in Zaporizhzhia due to "Geran" (Shahed) drone strikes. Russian milbloggers "Colonelcassad" and "НгП раZVедка" posted videos of large fires and smoke plumes, with crying emojis. This indicates continued, deliberate targeting of civilian industrial infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). The Zaporizhzhia OVA subsequently reported on the evacuation of children from Stebnogorsk to Rivne, highlighting the humanitarian impact and ongoing efforts to secure vulnerable populations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Mykolaiv Oblast: No new information in this reporting period.
• Kherson Oblast: No new information in this reporting period.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Zaporizhzhia: Night-time drone strikes confirmed, indicating favorable conditions for UAV operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Moscow (IRRELEVANT): Russian state media (Новости Москвы) reported a weather forecast for Moscow (sun returning in early July). No direct impact on Ukraine operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:

  • Civilian Protection & Humanitarian Efforts: Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration (ОВА) reported the relocation of children from Stebnogorsk to a summer camp in Rivne Oblast, demonstrating ongoing efforts to protect civilians from conflict zones. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • POW & MIA Support: The Coordination Staff for POW and MIA held a meeting with families of 59th Separate Motorized Infantry Brigade personnel, indicating continued focus on personnel welfare and information for families. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Counter-Disinformation: The Center for Countering Disinformation (ЦПД) continues to counter Russian narratives blaming Ukrainian AD for civilian casualties in Kyiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

• Russian Forces:

  • Persistent Air Strikes (Shahed/Geran): Confirmed use of "Geran" (Shahed) drones against industrial targets in Zaporizhzhia, indicating continued capability and intent to strike civilian economic infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Stability & Suppression of Dissent (UPDATED):
    • Detention of Milbloggers: Further reports (МОБИЛИЗАЦИЯ | Новости | Срочники, Два майора) confirm the detention of Mikhail Polynkov, owner of "Soldier's Truth" (СОЛДАТСКАЯ ПРАВДА) Telegram channel, with video footage showing forceful entry by uniformed personnel (MCHS, possibly military police). This confirms a deepening crackdown on internal critics, even from the pro-war camp. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Desertion/AWOL: "БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС" (Ukrainian source) reported two soldiers ("Agat" and "Sizy") from the Russian 15th Motorized Rifle Regiment defecting from positions in Kupyansk direction with weapons, with an offer of reward for their apprehension but "not to zero them out." This indicates potential for morale issues and disciplinary problems within frontline units. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, Ukrainian source reporting Russian internal issue).
  • Economic Propaganda: TASS continues to heavily promote SPIEF-2025, showcasing new civilian vehicles (Lada Niva Travel) and reporting statements by Russian officials (Manturov) on the conditions for foreign companies to return to the Russian market (sanctions lifting). This aims to project economic normalcy and resilience despite sanctions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Disinformation Campaigns: Continue to spread fake narratives blaming Ukrainian AD for civilian casualties in Kyiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Counter-NATO/Anti-Western Narratives: TASS published a Guardian article stating Europe no longer hopes Trump will resume military aid to Ukraine, aiming to sow discord and demoralize Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Middle East Exploitation: TASS reported Iran's Supreme Leader's defiant response to Trump's call for surrender, continuing to amplify narratives of confrontation between the West and its adversaries. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Russian milbloggers (Оперативний ЗСУ, Colonelcassad) continue to amplify Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities (IAEA claim) and Israeli military helicopters (AH-1J Cobra) at Iranian airbases, with Russian MFA officials (per Operativnyi ZSU) threatening the US if it provides "direct military aid" to Israel. This signifies an escalation of Russia's efforts to manipulate the Middle East narrative and deter US action. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • UUV Development (Propaganda): "Два майора" published a speculative graphic/diagram of a "BRITESTORM" Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV) for "EW and SIGINT," aiming to project advanced Russian military technological capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: LOW, speculative graphic, likely propaganda).

• Third Parties:

  • Finland (IRRELEVANT): "Север.Реалии" reported the suspension of Finland's Parliament Secretary General due to criminal suspicion. No direct impact on Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • The Guardian (via TASS): Reports that Europe no longer expects Trump to resume military aid to Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities (Russia):
  • Sustained UAV/Missile Strikes on Civilian Infrastructure: Confirmed capability to conduct Shahed drone attacks on industrial targets in Zaporizhzhia, aiming to degrade economic capacity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Control & Suppression: Demonstrated capability to forcefully detain and suppress critical voices (Polynkov detention) even from within the pro-war milblogger community, indicating a high level of internal security control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Manipulation (CRITICAL, ESCALATED): Significantly escalated its IO efforts by explicitly threatening US action if direct military aid is provided to Israel. Continues to aggressively promote narratives of economic resilience and advanced military technology (UUV). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Frontline Disciplinary Action: Ability to respond to desertion attempts with search and apprehension efforts (Kupyansk). (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Intentions (Russia):
  • Degrade Ukrainian Economic and Civilian Resilience: Continue targeting industrial facilities and critical infrastructure to undermine Ukraine's ability to sustain the war effort and impose a heavy civilian cost. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Reinforce Internal Control and Suppress Dissent: Crack down on milbloggers and other internal critics to maintain a unified information space and prevent erosion of public trust or morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Shape Global Geopolitical Narrative (CRITICAL, ESCALATED): Directly threaten a major power (US) over a third-party conflict (Middle East) to assert Russia's global influence and create a wedge between Western allies. Continue to portray Russia as economically resilient and technologically advanced despite sanctions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Demoralize Ukrainian Allies: Use Western media reports (The Guardian via TASS) to suggest a decline in US/European support for Ukraine, aiming to influence Western decision-making and Ukrainian morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Enhanced Internal Crackdown: The public and documented detention of a prominent milblogger (Polynkov) with forceful methods signifies a more aggressive approach to internal information control than previously observed. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Direct Diplomatic Threats (Hypothetical): The Russian MFA's reported direct threat to the US over military aid to Israel, if confirmed, represents a significant escalation in Russia's diplomatic and IO strategy, pushing new red lines in its engagement with global crises. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Propaganda of Advanced UUV Capabilities: The release of speculative UUV design (BRITESTORM) suggests an adaptive effort to project advanced military innovation, possibly in response to perceived Western technological superiority or to deter Western naval activity. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Logistics continue to support Shahed drone attacks. The public display of new civilian vehicles (Lada Niva Travel) and discussions at SPIEF reinforce the narrative of economic sustainment despite sanctions, though real-world impacts remain. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 is highly effective in synchronizing strategic IO and domestic control measures. The coordinated narrative around SPIEF, the Middle East, and the internal crackdown on milbloggers demonstrate centralized control. However, internal disciplinary issues (desertion, previous reports of illegal detention of mobilized soldiers) suggest C2 effectiveness may be strained at the unit level or that there's a willingness to use harsh, potentially unlawful, methods to enforce control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• UAF maintains defensive posture against ground attacks and continues to manage ongoing air threats. Civilian protection efforts are active. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Focus on personnel welfare and family support (POW/MIA coordination) indicates a commitment to long-term sustainability and morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued efforts to counter Russian disinformation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Effective Civilian Protection: Successful relocation of children from front-line areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Support Mechanisms: Continued operation of POW/MIA coordination efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Counter-IO: Persistent debunking of Russian false narratives regarding AD. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks:
  • Continued Civilian Infrastructure Damage: Significant fires at an industrial enterprise in Zaporizhzhia underscore Russia's continued ability to inflict economic damage and terrorize civilian populations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Persistent Russian IO & Diplomatic Pressure: Russia's escalating and aggressive information warfare, including direct threats to the US over Middle East policy and amplifying narratives of declining Western support, creates a challenging international environment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense (AD) & Counter-UAV: Continued requirement for AD systems and interceptors to protect critical civilian infrastructure from Shahed drone attacks.
• Resilience Support: Resources for civilian protection and relocation efforts remain critical for maintaining morale and reducing the humanitarian burden.
• Information Warfare Capabilities: Enhanced capacity needed to counter Russia's increasingly aggressive and multifaceted information campaigns, including direct threats to allies and propaganda of advanced technology.
• Personnel Welfare: Continued focus and resources for families of POW/MIA are crucial for morale.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Military Success & Normalization: Promotion of new civilian vehicle models (Lada Niva Travel) at SPIEF, combined with economic overtures, aims to normalize Russia's image and project domestic stability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Escalated Global Conflict Amplification (CRITICAL):
    • Direct US Threat: Russian MFA threatening the US over "direct military aid" to Israel is a significant escalation aimed at deterring US action and driving a wedge between allies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Amplification of Iranian Defiance: Highlighting Iran's Supreme Leader defying Trump and claims of Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear sites and military assets continues to fuel a narrative of escalating regional conflict, diverting attention from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Projecting Advanced Military Tech: Dissemination of "BRITESTORM" UUV concept is a technological propaganda effort. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Undermining Western Unity & Support: Amplification of The Guardian's report that Europe has lost hope in Trump resuming military aid to Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Control & Justification of Crackdown: The forceful detention of milbloggers is likely presented internally as necessary for stability, despite appearing to be a suppression of dissent. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Blaming Ukrainian AD: Persistence in blaming Ukrainian AD for civilian casualties in Kyiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Narratives:
  • Documentation of Russian War Crimes/Terror: Continued reporting of civilian infrastructure damage (Zaporizhzhia fires), though this period focuses on humanitarian responses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Humanitarian Efforts & Civilian Protection: Highlighting the relocation of children and POW/MIA support demonstrates care for the population and personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Countering Russian Fakes: Direct public debunking of Russian AD blaming narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exposing Russian Internal Issues: Reporting on Russian desertions and the detention of milbloggers to highlight internal military and societal weaknesses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Sustained by defensive actions, civilian protection efforts, and the continued functioning of governmental support for POW/MIA families. Potentially dampened by persistent Russian air attacks on cities (Zaporizhzhia) and the human cost. News of Russian internal issues (desertions, milblogger detentions) may provide a morale boost.
• Russian Morale: Pro-war elements likely buoyed by economic propaganda (SPIEF, new Lada models) and the aggressive diplomatic posturing against the US/West over the Middle East. However, the confirmed forceful detention of a milblogger and reports of desertions could create apprehension and expose cracks in the facade of unity within the military.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Russia-US/Western Relations (CRITICAL): Russian MFA's reported threat to the US regarding military aid to Israel marks a significant escalation of rhetoric aimed at shaping US foreign policy. The TASS report on Europe's dwindling hope for Trump's military aid to Ukraine reflects Russian attempts to exploit potential political shifts in the West. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Middle East as a Diversion: Russia continues to actively use the Israel-Iran conflict as a primary means to divert global attention and resources from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Sanctions Evasion: Russia's public overtures for foreign companies to return post-sanctions and its focus on economic resilience at SPIEF aim to erode the effectiveness of international sanctions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained, Selective Air Attacks on Civilian Infrastructure: Russia will continue to launch Shahed drones and potentially other missile systems against Ukrainian industrial facilities, energy infrastructure, and urban areas, particularly in Southern and Eastern Oblasts (e.g., Zaporizhzhia), aiming to cause economic disruption and terror. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intensified Internal Information Control & Suppression: Following the detention of Polynkov, Russia will likely increase efforts to monitor and suppress dissenting voices within the milblogger community and broader society, using legal and enforcement mechanisms to maintain a unified narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Aggressive Information Warfare Leveraging Global Crises (Middle East, Western Politics): Russia will further amplify and manipulate narratives around the Israel-Iran conflict, possibly fabricating more direct links to Ukraine or explicitly threatening Western powers (like the US over Israel aid) to create global instability and divert focus from Ukraine. They will also seek to exploit any signs of waning Western support for Ukraine, particularly concerning future US aid. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Ground Pressure with Minimal Breakthroughs: Russian ground forces will maintain pressure along existing axes (Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Sumy/Kharkiv borders) but are unlikely to achieve significant operational breakthroughs in the immediate future without major force repositioning. Focus will be on attriting UAF and making incremental gains. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Propaganda of Technological Prowess: Russia will continue to disseminate speculative or unverified information about new military technologies (e.g., UUVs) to project an image of advanced capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Decisive Breakthrough and Encirclement in Donetsk Coupled with Deep Strikes: Russia concentrates a major force (potentially drawn from claimed Northern gains) for a coordinated breakthrough around Kostyantynivka or Pokrovsk, aiming for encirclement and major operational depth in Donetsk, supported by overwhelming KAB strikes and precision missile/UAV attacks on Ukrainian logistics and reserves in the rear. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Escalated Hybrid Campaign Synchronized with Mass Civilian Targeting: Russia launches a coordinated, nationwide cyberattack on critical Ukrainian infrastructure (energy, financial, communication) simultaneously with a new wave of massed missile/UAV strikes (potentially including new cluster munition types or thermobaric warheads) against civilian centers and emergency services, aiming to paralyze civil response and cause widespread societal collapse. This would be coupled with extreme, targeted IO blaming Ukraine or Western allies. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Triggering a Major Western Policy Shift via Global Crisis Exploitation: Russia's aggressive diplomatic threats and information operations (e.g., direct threats to the US over Israel, amplified narratives of Western disunity) successfully lead to a significant and rapid reduction or cessation of critical military aid to Ukraine from major Western partners (e.g., US, Germany), critically weakening UAF's defensive capabilities and leading to a collapse of defensive lines in key sectors. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-6 hours):
  • Zaporizhzhia: Assess full extent of damage from Shahed strikes. Monitor for follow-on attacks.
  • IO: Observe immediate global reactions to Russian MFA's reported threats concerning US aid to Israel. Monitor for further Russian narrative shaping around this.
  • Internal Russia: Monitor for any official statements or further developments regarding the detention of milbloggers or reports of desertion/AWOL cases.
• Short-term (Next 6-24 hours):
  • Frontline: Continue to monitor ground activity in Sumy/Kharkiv, especially for any confirmation/denial of Russian territorial claims, which remain critical. Assess if reports of desertion affect Russian unit cohesion or immediate tactical plans.
  • Air Threat: Anticipate further Shahed or missile strikes against Ukrainian urban/industrial targets, potentially in response to internal Russian crackdowns or as a continued terror campaign.
  • Diplomatic: Assess the effectiveness of Russian attempts to influence Western aid decisions through propaganda leveraging The Guardian report.
• Medium-term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • Offensive Operations: Determine if current Russian ground pressure and air attacks (especially on industrial targets) are precursors to a larger, more coordinated offensive designed to exploit perceived Ukrainian resource constraints or global distractions.
  • International: Evaluate the broader impact of Russia's aggressive Middle East-related IO on US/Western policy and unity concerning Ukraine.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• GAP 95 (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE): VERIFICATION OF NOVO NIKOLAEVKA (SUMY OBLAST) AND DOLGENKOYE (KHARKIV OBLAST) CONTROL:
  • URGENTLY VERIFY Russian claims of capturing Novonikolaevka, Sumy Oblast, and Dolgenkoye, Kharkiv Oblast. Determine UAF defensive lines, if any units were withdrawn/repositioned, and the current extent of Russian presence in these areas. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 103 (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE, UPDATED): RUSSIAN FORCE CONCENTRATION SUMY/KHARKIV AXES:
  • Conduct comprehensive ISR (IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT) to detect any significant Russian force build-up, logistics staging, or reconnaissance-in-force activities indicating a larger offensive in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts, especially near Sumy city or key logistical routes. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 93 (UPDATED): RUSSIAN AVIATION/DRONE STRIKE PATTERNS (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE):
  • Analyze targets and frequency of Russian tactical aviation (KABs) and drone strikes (including FPVs, Lancet, reconnaissance) across all affected regions. Assess if strike patterns indicate preparation for specific ground operations or new target sets, especially the continued targeting of industrial/economic infrastructure (Zaporizhzhia) and emergency services (Kherson). (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 114 (NEW, CRITICAL): IMPACT OF RUSSIAN MILBLOGGER CRACKDOWN ON INTERNAL DISSENT AND IO STRATEGY:
  • Assess the short and long-term impacts of the detention of Mikhail Polynkov and other potential crackdowns on pro-war milbloggers. Monitor for shifts in their reporting, levels of criticism, or attempts by Russian authorities to replace them with more compliant voices. Analyze how this affects internal Russian information coherence and potential military morale. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 115 (NEW, CRITICAL): SCOPE OF RUSSIAN MILITARY DISCIPLINARY ISSUES/DESERTIONS:
  • Investigate the frequency, scale, and specific causes of desertions or AWOL cases within Russian frontline units (e.g., 15th Motorized Rifle Regiment in Kupyansk direction). Assess the impact on unit cohesion, combat effectiveness, and overall troop morale. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 116 (NEW, HIGH): VERACITY AND IMPLICATIONS OF RUSSIAN MFA THREATS AGAINST US (ISRAEL AID):
  • Collect and verify the exact wording and context of Russian MFA threats against the US regarding "direct military aid" to Israel. Analyze the potential for this to escalate into direct confrontation or be used as a diplomatic leverage point against Ukraine. (PRIORITY: HIGH).
• GAP 105 (UPDATED, HIGH): REAL-WORLD IMPACT OF RUSSIAN ECONOMIC ENGAGEMENT/DIPLOMACY:
  • Assess the implications of Russia's continued economic overtures at SPIEF, particularly statements regarding foreign companies returning post-sanctions. Monitor for any concrete agreements or shifts in Western business engagement. (PRIORITY: HIGH).
• GAP 117 (NEW, MEDIUM): ASSESSMENT OF RUSSIAN "BRITESTORM" UUV CAPABILITIES:
  • Collect and analyze all available information (OSINT, imagery) on the "BRITESTORM" UUV, its claimed EW/SIGINT capabilities, and its potential for operational deployment. Determine if this is a real program or primarily a propaganda effort. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN TERRITORIAL CLAIMS IN SUMY AND KHARKIV. Task all-source ISR, including satellite imagery, ground unit reports, and HUMINT, to immediately confirm or deny Russian claims of capturing Novonikolaevka (Sumy Oblast) and Dolgenkoye (Kharkiv Oblast). This is paramount to maintaining an accurate battlefield picture, informing defensive planning, and rapidly countering enemy information operations. (Supports CR 95).
  2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: SURGE COLLECTION ON SUMY/KHARKIV AXES. Increase ISR coverage on Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts for signs of Russian force build-up, advanced reconnaissance, or pre-offensive preparations, particularly for a larger ground offensive or intensified deep strikes beyond claimed areas. (Supports CR 103).
  3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: MONITOR RUSSIAN INTERNAL CONTROL & MILBLOGGER CRACKDOWN. Task OSINT to closely monitor Russian internal information space for further crackdowns on milbloggers or other critical voices, for any further attempts to manipulate or conceal sensitive data. Analyze the impact on Russian information warfare coherence and military-society relations. (Supports CR 114).
  4. CRITICAL PRIORITY: ASSESS RUSSIAN FRONTLINE DESERTION/DISCIPLINE. Task HUMINT and OSINT to verify and assess the scale and impact of desertions (e.g., 15th Motorized Rifle Regiment) and other disciplinary issues within Russian frontline units. This provides insight into morale and combat readiness. (Supports CR 115).
  5. URGENT: TRACK RUSSIAN MFA THREATS & GEOPOLITICAL MANEUVERS. Task political intelligence to closely track and verify statements by Russian MFA officials, especially direct threats against major powers (US re: Israel). Analyze implications for broader geopolitical shifts and support for Ukraine. (Supports CR 116).
  6. ONGOING: ANALYZE RUSSIAN ECONOMIC/TECHNOLOGICAL PROPAGANDA. Task economic intelligence and OSINT to analyze Russian efforts to project economic resilience (SPIEF, Lada models) and technological prowess (BRITESTORM UUV). Identify specific propaganda targets and assess their effectiveness. (Supports CR 105, 117).
  7. ONGOING: CONTINUOUS ADVERSARY AIR/DRONE ASSET TRACKING. Maintain constant monitoring of all Russian strategic and tactical aviation and drone activity. Prioritize analysis of strike patterns, targets, and munition types, especially continued attacks on industrial/economic infrastructure (e.g., Zaporizhzhia). (Supports CR 93).

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain HIGHEST AD alert posture in Zaporizhzhia and other industrial centers against Shahed drone attacks. Prioritize defense of critical infrastructure.
  2. URGENT: Reinforce AD coverage in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts if Russian ground pressure or reconnaissance activity increases, anticipating potential deep strikes or KAB barrages.
  3. ONGOING: Continue to develop and disseminate adaptive counter-UAV tactics and training materials to all units.

• Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Commanders in Sumy, Kharkiv, Donetsk, and Zaporizhzhia axes to provide immediate, verified ground-level assessments of enemy activity, particularly in areas of claimed Russian advance (e.g., Novonikolaevka, Dolgenkoye). Confirm unit statuses and defensive lines.
  2. URGENT: Maintain flexible reserves, particularly in the North, to respond to any significant breakthroughs or intensified offensives on the Sumy/Kharkiv axes.
  3. ONGOING: Continue and expand effective FPV drone operations against Russian personnel, logistics, and critical C2/ISR infrastructure.
  4. ONGOING: Reinforce disciplinary measures and address morale issues within UAF units to prevent internal problems akin to those reported on the Russian side.

• Information Operations & Diplomatic:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: ROBUSTLY DEBUNK FALSE TERRITORIAL CLAIMS. Forcefully and publicly deny Russian claims of territorial gains (e.g., Novonikolaevka, Dolgenkoye) if found to be false, providing verified counter-narratives, imagery, and on-the-ground reports to maintain domestic and international morale.
  2. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: CONDEMN TARGETING OF CIVILIAN INFRASTRUCTURE. Vigorously document and disseminate evidence of all Russian attacks on civilian industrial infrastructure (e.g., Zaporizhzhia fires) to international partners and media, emphasizing economic warfare and war crimes.
  3. URGENT: COUNTER RUSSIAN GLOBAL THREAT NARRATIVES. Publicly and diplomatically counter Russia's attempts to directly threaten Western powers (e.g., US over Israel aid) and manipulate the narrative of global conflicts to its advantage. Clearly state that such actions aim to divert attention from Ukraine.
  4. URGENT: EXPOSE RUSSIAN INTERNAL REPRESSION. Publicly highlight the detention of Russian milbloggers and reports of desertion as evidence of internal weakness and a desperate attempt by the Kremlin to control information and suppress dissent, even from its supporters.
  5. ONGOING: AMPLIFY UKRAINIAN HUMANITARIAN EFFORTS. Proactively communicate successful civilian protection efforts (e.g., children's evacuation to Rivne) and support for military families (POW/MIA coordination) to demonstrate Ukraine's commitment to its people and international norms.
  6. ONGOING: COUNTER RUSSIAN ECONOMIC PROPAGANDA. Debunk Russian narratives of economic normalcy (e.g., SPIEF, Lada models) by highlighting the continued impact of sanctions and the country's dependence on war economy.