Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 18 JUN 25 / 07:30 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 18 JUN 25 / 07:00 ZULU - 18 JUN 25 / 07:30 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Kyiv Oblast: Confirmed civilian casualties from the 17 JUN 25 mass missile strike have risen to 22 killed and over 130 injured. This continues to underscore the Russian intent to terrorize civilian populations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Kharkiv Oblast: Ukrainian Prosecutor General's Office reports the detention of a Kharkiv resident providing location intelligence on Ukrainian Defense Forces (UDF) to the enemy. This indicates persistent enemy HUMINT efforts within the oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Donetsk Oblast (Makiivka): Russian sources (Mash na Donbasse) report the conviction of an individual from Yasynuvata accused of leaking UDF locations near Makiivka to the SBU. This is likely a Russian counter-intelligence propaganda piece, but suggests ongoing intelligence and counter-intelligence activities in occupied territories. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Sumy Oblast: Ukrainian Air Force (AFU) reports Russian tactical aviation launching KABs (Guided Aerial Bombs) on Sumy Oblast. This confirms continued Russian air pressure on the region, supporting the earlier observation of sustained Russian ground pressure and claims of localized advances. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Komar Settlement (Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia Axis, Russian claimed): A Russian milblogger (Voindv) released an interview with a Russian Marine from the 336th Separate Guards Marine Brigade claiming capture/stabilization of Komar, a heavily damaged settlement, and describing fierce close-quarters combat and significant Ukrainian fortifications. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for full capture/stabilization; MEDIUM for Russian intent to claim and for indicating heavy fighting in this direction).
• Kursk Oblast (Russia): Russian MoD claims the 1st Motorized Rifle Regiment (Sever Group of Forces) is recovering bodies of Ukrainian servicemen and "foreign mercenaries" in Sudzha district. This suggests UAF cross-border activity in Kursk Oblast leading to casualties, or is a Russian propaganda effort to exaggerate UAF losses in cross-border raids. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for UAF activity; HIGH for Russian propaganda intent).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new weather updates, clear conditions likely persist, favoring air and drone operations.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces: UAF continues counter-intelligence operations against enemy agents (Kharkiv detention). AFU maintains air defense and monitors enemy air activity. Ukrainian forces are also actively involved in prisoner-of-war (POW) operations (Azov's capture of 6 POWs, including a soldier from 150th Division), which are being leveraged for intelligence and information operations. The National Guard unit "Rubizh" is collecting funds for equipment, indicating ongoing resource needs.
• Russian Forces: Continue air strikes with KABs (Sumy). Maintain ground pressure in key areas (Komar claim, although unverified). Conducting counter-intelligence operations and propaganda (Makiivka "spy" conviction, Kursk body recovery). Actively conducting IO, including showcasing luxury vehicles at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) and promoting historical narratives. Mobile internet issues in St. Petersburg during SPIEF could indicate internal security measures or technical issues impacting the information environment.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities (Russia):
  • Guided Aerial Bomb (KAB) Strikes: Confirmed capability to conduct precision strikes using KABs via tactical aviation in Sumy Oblast. This adds to the multi-domain pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal HUMINT/Counter-Intelligence: Russian forces actively seek to disrupt Ukrainian intelligence networks and leverage alleged arrests for propaganda purposes (Makiivka). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Warfare (Multi-faceted):
    • Dehumanization/Demoralization: MoD Russia's video of body recovery in Kursk, emphasizing "foreign mercenaries," aims to dehumanize UAF and demoralize support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Internal Cohesion/Economic Projection: TASS continues to showcase Russian economic "achievements" (rail infrastructure, luxury cars at SPIEF), aiming to project stability and resilience internally and to select international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Divergence (Middle East): TASS reports from Netanyahu's office on high Israeli casualties from Iranian missile strikes, amplifying the Middle East crisis to divert international attention from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Historical Narratives: TASS showcases Putin's father's WWII award sheet, promoting historical continuity and military prowess. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions (Russia):
  • Sustain Air Pressure: Intent to continue using air-launched munitions (KABs) to degrade Ukrainian defenses and infrastructure, particularly in border regions like Sumy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Maintain Control of Occupied Territories: By targeting and prosecuting alleged Ukrainian agents, Russia aims to enforce control and deter collaboration in occupied regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Manipulate Global Information Environment: Aggressively pursuing a strategy to divert international focus from Ukraine by amplifying other crises and promoting narratives of Russian strength and stability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Increased KAB Use on Sumy Axis: Confirmed KAB launches on Sumy Oblast from tactical aviation suggest a sustained or increased use of these precision munitions in the northern direction, likely in support of ground pressure or shaping operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Leveraging POWs for Propaganda: While not new, the explicit focus on a POW's demoralized state and negative portrayal of Russian command (Dudikov Dmitry video) by Ukrainian sources highlights the ongoing information battle using captured personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Russian military logistics for KABs and tactical aviation appear robust for current operational tempo. The exhibition of luxury vehicles and railway projects at SPIEF, though civilian, attempts to project overall economic and industrial capacity. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian military C2 effectively coordinates tactical air strikes. IO C2 remains highly adaptive and capable of immediate narrative amplification across multiple channels. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• UAF maintains an active defensive and counter-intelligence posture (Kharkiv agent detention). AFU is active in monitoring and responding to air threats. Ukrainian forces are effectively using captured POWs for intelligence and IO purposes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The National Guard's "Rubizh" brigade seeking donations indicates ongoing resource needs for equipment and property, highlighting the sustainment challenges faced by UAF units. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Counter-Intelligence: The SBU's detention of the Kharkiv agent is a significant success in disrupting enemy intelligence networks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • POW Operations: Azov's capture of 6 POWs and the subsequent intelligence/propaganda value derived from the interview with Dudikov Dmitry. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks:
  • Civilian Casualties: The rising death toll in Kyiv from the 17 JUN missile strike is a grave setback in civilian protection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Equipment Losses: The National Guard's "Rubizh" brigade's need for donations for "destroyed property and equipment" suggests recent combat losses requiring replenishment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense: Continued critical need for advanced AD systems to protect urban centers from KAB and missile strikes.
• Logistics/Equipment: Ongoing requirements for unit re-equipment and resupply, as evidenced by the National Guard's fundraising appeal.
• Information Counter-Offensive: Resources needed to counter Russia's sophisticated multi-layered information operations, including their attempts to link Ukraine to other global crises and their internal propaganda.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (Middle East Diversion, Internal Cohesion, Military Prowess):
  • Escalated Middle East Diversion: TASS reports (via Netanyahu's office) of 400 ballistic missiles and significant casualties in Israel from Iran. This is a direct amplification of another conflict to draw global attention away from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Counter-Intelligence Propaganda: Mash na Donbasse's video of a "spy" conviction aims to deter pro-Ukrainian activity in occupied areas and project Russian security services' effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Dehumanization/Enemy Casualties: Russian MoD's video of "Ukrainian servicemen and foreign mercenaries" bodies in Kursk is a clear attempt to demoralize UAF and its supporters and to legitimize Russian actions by portraying the enemy as non-Ukrainian. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Economic Projection: TASS's extensive coverage of SPIEF, showcasing high-speed rail and luxury vehicles (Aurus), serves to project Russian economic resilience and technological advancement despite sanctions, targeting both internal and selective external audiences. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Historical Narratives: TASS's presentation of Putin's father's WWII award sheet links the current conflict to historical Russian military glory and sacrifice, fostering patriotic sentiment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Geopolitical Alignment: Reuters report (via Tsaplienko) on "Trump's Ukraine envoy" meeting Lukashenko, if accurate (despite future date), is a significant narrative that could signal shifts in Western foreign policy and potentially create rifts in anti-Russian alliances. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for accuracy, HIGH for narrative impact if true).
• Ukrainian Narratives:
  • Counter-Intelligence Success: SBU's publicizing of the Kharkiv agent's detention reinforces Ukrainian counter-intelligence effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • POW Exploitation for Morale/Recruitment Deterrent: Nikolaevskiy Vanek's video of the Russian POW (Dudikov Dmitry) provides a compelling narrative of poor Russian command, low morale, and advises against conscription, directly targeting Russian recruitment and internal support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Transparency of Losses/Needs: The National Guard's fundraising appeal demonstrates transparency about combat losses and ongoing resource requirements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Political/Civic Continuity: Ukrainian media (Tsaplienko) reporting on the Verkhovna Rada preparing to adopt multiple citizenship legislation highlights continued democratic and civic processes despite the war. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Sustained resilience is evident, but civilian casualties in Kyiv and equipment losses are a constant strain. The SBU's counter-intelligence successes and POW exploitation help bolster morale and reinforce narratives of Ukrainian effectiveness.
• Russian Morale: Actively reinforced by narratives of military success (Komar claim), economic stability (SPIEF coverage), and historical pride. Propaganda aiming to dehumanize UAF and "foreign mercenaries" seeks to solidify internal support for the war. The POW's testimony, if widely disseminated in Russia, could negatively impact morale and recruitment, which is why Russia attempts to control such narratives.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• The Reuters report on a potential Kellogg-Lukashenko meeting, if genuine (despite the future date), presents a complex diplomatic development that could signal shifts in US foreign policy or attempts to establish unofficial diplomatic channels with Belarus. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for actual occurrence; HIGH for potential strategic impact on Western unity and Belarus's role).
• Russian amplification of the Middle East crisis continues to be a primary effort to divert international attention and resources from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained KAB and UAV Strikes: Russia will continue to use KABs from tactical aviation and Shahed UAVs (Geraniums) to target border regions (Sumy, Kharkiv) and urban centers, aiming to degrade infrastructure and terrorize civilians. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intensified Information Operations: Russia will further escalate its multi-faceted IO campaign, particularly focusing on:
  • Aggressive amplification of international conflicts (Middle East) to divert global attention.
  • Narratives of Russian economic and military resilience (SPIEF, historical glorification).
  • Dehumanization of Ukrainian forces and "mercenaries" through graphic content.
  • Counter-intelligence propaganda in occupied territories. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Localized Ground Probing / Fixing Operations: Russia will likely continue localized ground actions in areas like Sumy Oblast and along the Donetsk axes (e.g., Komar), aiming to fix Ukrainian forces and potentially achieve minor territorial gains, whether for strategic or IO effect. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Coordinated Ground Offensive in Sumy/Kharkiv Supported by KABs: A more significant ground offensive in Sumy or Kharkiv oblasts, immediately preceded and supported by massed KAB strikes and possibly increased use of thermobaric weapons, aiming for a deeper penetration to establish a larger "buffer zone" or draw significant UAF reserves. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Targeted Assassination/Sabotage of Key Ukrainian Personnel/Infrastructure: Under the cover of sustained air attacks and IO, Russia could activate more sophisticated agent networks within Ukraine to conduct high-profile assassinations of political or military leaders, or significant sabotage of critical national infrastructure, exploiting perceived vulnerabilities highlighted by recent arrests. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Exploitation of Diplomatic Rifts: If the reported Kellogg-Lukashenko meeting materializes, Russia could attempt to exploit any emerging unofficial diplomatic channels or perceived shifts in Western policy to create confusion, undermine international consensus, or push for peace proposals favorable to its interests. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for immediate impact; MEDIUM for long-term strategic threat).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-6 hours):
  • Air Threat: Monitor Sumy and Kharkiv for continued KAB launches or other tactical aviation activity.
  • IO: Observe for further Russian amplification of the Middle East crisis and any new narratives regarding the Kellogg-Lukashenko meeting.
  • Friendly Forces: Assess immediate UAF unit replenishment needs based on fundraising appeals (e.g., Rubizh brigade).
• Short-term (Next 6-24 hours):
  • Ground (Sumy/Kharkiv): Assess whether current KAB strikes are isolated or precursors to increased ground activity.
  • IO: Evaluate the reach and impact of Russian narratives related to SPIEF and any political/diplomatic shifts.
  • Counter-Intelligence: Follow up on the Kharkiv detention for further network unraveling.
• Medium-term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • Strategic: Analyze any official reactions or diplomatic fallout from the rumored Kellogg-Lukashenko meeting.
  • Air Defense: Assess the cumulative impact of sustained KAB/UAV strikes on UAF AD resources.
  • Logistics: Evaluate the efficiency of Ukrainian efforts to replenish equipment losses.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• GAP 88 (UPDATED): RUSSIAN ADVANCES IN NOVYI MYR, KHARKIV OBLAST (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE): Still no direct information to verify or refute this.
  • URGENTLY VERIFY Russian claims of initiating combat for Novyi Myr.
  • Determine the scale of Russian forces involved, their specific objectives, and UAF defensive posture/response. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 92 (UPDATED): VERIFICATION OF YABLONOVKA (SUMY OBLAST) CAPTURE (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE): Still unverified, but KAB strikes in Sumy increase its relevance.
  • URGENTLY VERIFY the Russian claim of capturing Yablonovka, Sumy Oblast.
  • Determine the current control of Yablonovka.
  • Assess the scale of Russian forces involved and their intent in this area, linking it to KAB strikes. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 90 (UPDATED): BDA IN ZAPORIZHZHIA & KYIV (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE):
  • Conduct comprehensive Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) for both Zaporizhzhia and Kyiv missile/drone attacks, prioritizing confirmed Kh-101 cluster munition use in Kyiv.
  • Determine specific targeting patterns, munition types, and estimated civilian/infrastructure damage. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 93 (NEW): RUSSIAN KAB STRIKE PATTERNS (SUMY/KHARKIV) (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE):
  • Analyze the frequency, targeting, and impact of Russian KAB strikes in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts.
  • Assess whether KAB use indicates shifting Russian air tactics or preparation for ground offensives. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 94 (NEW): VERIFICATION OF KOMAR SETTLEMENT STATUS (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE): Russian milblogger claims capture of Komar (likely Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia axis).
  • URGENTLY VERIFY the status of Komar settlement and current control.
  • Assess Russian forces involved and UAF defensive posture in the area. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 67 (UPDATED): RUSSIAN INTERNAL PROPAGANDA / DISINFORMATION (HIGH, UPDATED FOCUS):
  • Monitor the effectiveness of Russian narratives amplifying the Middle East crisis and those promoting Russian economic/military strength (SPIEF, historical glorification).
  • Assess the impact of Russian MoD's dehumanization propaganda (Kursk body recovery). (PRIORITY: HIGH).
• GAP 89 (UPDATED): KELLOGG-LUKASHENKO MEETING DETAILS AND OBJECTIVES (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE): The Reuters report makes this critical again.
  • Confirm the veracity and timing of the reported meeting between a Trump-associated envoy (Kellogg) and Lukashenko.
  • Determine the agenda, participants, and potential outcomes of the meeting, particularly concerning Ukraine. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: VERIFY ALL RUSSIAN TERRITORIAL CLAIMS. Task all-source ISR to immediately verify the status of Novyi Myr (Kharkiv), Yablonovka (Sumy), and Komar (Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia). This is paramount to maintaining an accurate battlefield picture and countering enemy IO. (Supports CR 88, 92, 94).
  2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: KAB STRIKE ANALYSIS. Immediately conduct detailed analysis of KAB strikes in Sumy Oblast, including BDA and potential targeting patterns. Disseminate findings to UAF ground and air defense units to inform tactical adjustments. (Supports CR 93).
  3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: KELLOGG-LUKASHENKO MEETING. Task all-source intelligence to confirm the veracity and gather all possible details regarding the rumored meeting. If confirmed, conduct a rapid assessment of its geopolitical implications for Ukraine and international support. (Supports CR 89).
  4. ONGOING: MONITOR RUSSIAN IO & EXPLOIT WEAKNESSES. Continue robust monitoring of Russian information operations, particularly their diversion tactics via the Middle East crisis and their internal projections of strength (SPIEF, historical narratives). Leverage captured POW testimonies (e.g., Dudikov Dmitry) to further undermine Russian morale and recruitment internally. Counter dehumanizing narratives immediately. (Supports CR 67).

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Reinforce AD coverage in Sumy and Kharkiv Oblasts, anticipating continued KAB and UAV strikes. Adjust AD assets to counter this specific threat profile (e.g., higher altitude intercepts for KABs, layered defense for UAVs).
  2. ONGOING: Maintain high AD alert posture. Emphasize resilience of C2 and distributed AD deployments to mitigate damage from potential combined arms or massed attacks.

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Commanders in Kharkiv, Sumy, and Donetsk/Zaporizhzhia axes to provide immediate ground-level assessments for Novyi Myr, Yablonovka, and Komar respectively. Reinforce units in areas under confirmed or suspected increased pressure.
  2. ONGOING: Conduct thorough BDA for any friendly force property/equipment destruction to inform urgent replenishment requests (as seen with "Rubizh" brigade).

• Information Operations & Diplomatic:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: COUNTER MIDDLE EAST DIVERSION. Proactively release clear and consistent messaging highlighting Russia's deliberate attempt to divert global attention by amplifying other conflicts. Specifically address the exaggerated claims of Israeli casualties.
  2. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: COUNTER FALSE TERRITORIAL CLAIMS. Rapidly and forcefully debunk Russian claims of territorial gains (Novyi Myr, Yablonovka, Komar) if found to be false, providing verified counter-narratives to maintain domestic and international morale.
  3. IMMEDIATE: DOCUMENT WAR CRIMES. Continue to document and disseminate evidence of all Russian attacks on civilian infrastructure and residential areas (e.g., Kyiv mass strike casualties, Zaporizhzhia BDA) to international partners and media, emphasizing war crimes and violations of international law (especially cluster munitions).
  4. URGENT: PREPARE FOR KELLOGG-LUKASHENKO NARRATIVES. Develop pre-emptive messaging to articulate Ukraine's position on any unofficial diplomatic engagement with Belarus and to counter narratives that might seek to legitimize Lukashenko or undermine international unity.
  5. ONGOING: EXPLOIT RUSSIAN MORALE ISSUES. Continue to amplify verified POW testimonies (e.g., Dudikov Dmitry) that highlight poor Russian command, low morale, and the futility of fighting in Ukraine, specifically targeting Russian domestic audiences to undermine support for mobilization and the war.
  6. ONGOING: REINFORCE UAF RESILIENCE NARRATIVES. Emphasize successful SBU counter-intelligence operations and the resilience of Ukrainian civic and political life (e.g., Verkhovna Rada activities) to counter Russian psychological operations.

---