Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 18 JUN 25 / 02:45 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 18 JUN 25 / 02:30 ZULU - 18 JUN 25 / 02:45 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Ukraine Operational Area: Confirmed Russian MoD claims of successful T-90M "Proryv" tank action disrupting Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) rotation on the Krasnolimansk axis. This indicates continued, albeit localized, Russian offensive pressure in this sector.
• Russian Internal Affairs/Border Regions: Zhukovsky Airport (Moscow Oblast) has resumed operations, indicating normalization after a prior disruption (likely air alert). Reports of Reuters stating Kellogg (likely General Keith Kellogg, former US National Security Advisor) preparing to meet with Lukashenko indicates continued US diplomatic engagement concerning Belarus and potentially the broader regional conflict.

1.2. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Defense: UAF continues to conduct defensive rotations, but Russian forces claim to be disrupting these. The UAF likely maintains a dispersed and concealed posture for high-value AD assets following recent massed Russian strikes.
  • Diplomatic/Strategic: UAF's diplomatic efforts remain focused on securing international support, but an RKB-Ukraine report (referencing unnamed media) suggests a joint G7 statement on Ukraine may not materialize, which could indicate internal disagreements or a shift in focus.
• Russian Forces:
  • Ground Forces: Claims of effective T-90M "Proryv" tank action on the Krasnolimansk axis. Video propaganda showcasing a 2S19 Msta-S howitzer (with cope cage) is likely intended for morale and recruitment.
  • Information Operations (IO): Continued military propaganda (TASS tank/artillery videos), and an ambiguous "Rybar" message "2 days before the war" which may be a delayed post or a cryptic threat. TASS also reports on an internal financial dispute involving the MoD, which is likely a background detail for domestic consumption.

1.3. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new specific weather updates affecting current operations. The previous period's reports of burnt trees around the 2S19 Msta-S video could suggest past dry conditions or shelling effects, but no immediate impact.

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities (Russia):
  • Offensive Ground Operations (Localized): Demonstrated capability to conduct localized armored assaults (T-90M) to disrupt UAF rotations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for claim, MEDIUM for impact verification).
  • Artillery Employment: Continued use of self-propelled artillery (2S19 Msta-S) with adaptive measures (cope cage). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Propaganda Production: Continues to produce high-quality military operational videos (TASS) for domestic consumption, emphasizing equipment superiority and combat effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Legal/Financial Oversight: Russia's MoD is engaged in internal financial disputes, indicating some level of bureaucratic oversight, though the strategic impact is unclear. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions (Russia):
  • Disrupt UAF Operations: Intent to disrupt UAF logistics and troop rotations, aiming to degrade combat effectiveness and maintain offensive initiative on specific axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Boost Domestic Morale/Recruitment: Propaganda videos serve to showcase Russian military might and resilience, particularly the use of modern equipment (T-90M) and adaptive tactics (cope cages), aimed at bolstering support and potentially recruitment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Project Normalcy (Internal): The Zhukovsky Airport resumption news is intended to project normalcy and effective control after disruptions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Adaptive Protection: The prominent display of a "cope cage" on the 2S19 Msta-S howitzer underscores continued Russian adaptation to FPV drone threats, even for rear-area or indirect fire assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Precision in Propaganda: Russian MoD claims specifically target UAF "rotations," indicating an intelligence-driven focus on disrupting UAF force generation and sustainment. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The TASS report on the MoD suing a construction enterprise for 668 million rubles suggests ongoing issues with military construction and logistics infrastructure, which could impact long-term sustainment. (CONFIDENCE: LOW relevance to immediate frontline logistics, HIGH relevance to broader sustainment issues).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Military C2: Appears to be effectively coordinating localized ground operations (Krasnolimansk) and integrating propaganda generation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• IO C2: Maintains high output of specific military action propaganda alongside broader strategic narratives. Rybar's ambiguous post could be a planned information operation or a reflection of internal tensions/speculation within the milblogger community. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Defensive Posture: UAF maintains a defensive posture, conducting rotations. Awareness of Russian efforts to disrupt these rotations is critical.
• Information Environment (Vulnerability): Reports of G7 disunity regarding a joint statement on Ukraine highlight a potential vulnerability in the international support narrative that Russia will immediately exploit.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Setbacks: Russian claims of disrupting UAF rotations on the Krasnolimansk axis, if true, represent a localized tactical setback. (CONFIDENCE: LOW, due to unverified Russian claim).
• Diplomatic Setbacks: The alleged lack of a joint G7 statement, if true, would represent a significant symbolic setback for Ukrainian diplomacy, potentially indicating reduced unity or focus among key partners. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, based on media report).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Force Protection: Continued need for robust force protection measures, particularly against FPV drones, necessitating ongoing adaptation to Russian "cope cage" type improvements.
• Diplomatic Counter-Messaging: Immediate need to understand and counter any perceived weakening of G7 unity regarding Ukraine.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (Military Efficacy, Resilience, Vague Threat):
  • T-90M "Proryv" effectiveness: Propagating images and claims of advanced Russian tanks disrupting UAF movements on the Krasnolimansk axis, aimed at demonstrating Russian combat superiority and demoralizing UAF. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian amplification, LOW for independent verification).
  • Adaptive Warfare: Showcasing "cope cages" on artillery to project an image of resilience and adaptability against modern threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Rybar's "2 days before the war" message: This could be a delayed post from February 2022, or a new, deliberately ambiguous message intended to create uncertainty and alarm, possibly hinting at an upcoming escalation. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for clear intent, HIGH for potential psychological impact).
  • Internal Financial Disputes: TASS report on MoD lawsuit is likely a domestic consumption piece, projecting transparency or accountability, but offers no direct combat relevance.
• Ukrainian Narratives (Vulnerability to Disunity):
  • G7 Disunity: The RBC-Ukraine report on the absence of a joint G7 statement on Ukraine is immediately exploitable by Russian IO to suggest declining international support or internal Western disagreements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian exploitation potential).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Sustained G7 support is crucial for morale. Any perceived crack in this unity (e.g., lack of joint statement) could negatively impact public sentiment and international confidence.
• Russian Morale: Military propaganda (T-90M, Msta-S videos) is aimed at boosting domestic morale and projecting strength, reinforcing the narrative of successful operations. Rybar's cryptic message, if interpreted as a new threat, could aim to rally support through fear or anticipation.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• G7 Unity (Potential Fracture): The report of no joint G7 statement on Ukraine, if true, would be a significant diplomatic concern. This could signal either a shift in G7 priorities, an inability to reach consensus on specific language regarding Ukraine, or simply that separate bilateral statements are preferred. It requires immediate clarification. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• US-Belarus Engagement: Kellogg's planned meeting with Lukashenko (Reuters) highlights ongoing diplomatic efforts by the US concerning Belarus, likely aimed at preventing deeper Russian military integration or expansion of influence. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Exploitation of Perceived G7 Disunity: Russia will immediately seize upon and amplify any real or perceived lack of G7 consensus on Ukraine, using it to push narratives of declining Western support and internal divisions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Sustained Localized Ground Pressure: Russia will continue localized ground assaults on key axes (e.g., Krasnolimansk, Kostyantynivka, Pokrovsk) using armored elements, aiming to disrupt UAF rotations and defensive preparations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Military Propaganda: Russia will continue to release high-quality military propaganda videos showcasing equipment and unit effectiveness to maintain domestic support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Escalated Cross-Border Operations/Diversionary Attacks: Following a period of intense information warfare (Kursk allegations, Rybar's ambiguous message), Russia could launch a series of limited, but highly publicized, cross-border raids or increased shelling into Ukrainian border regions (e.g., Sumy, Kharkiv) as a direct response to fabricated provocations, aiming to fix UAF forces and create a diversion for main efforts elsewhere. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Major Offensive on a New Axis Pretext: Building on the "2 days before the war" rhetoric, Russia could initiate a major offensive on a previously less active axis, such as Sumy or Kharkiv, under the guise of "retaliation" for alleged Ukrainian attacks on Russian territory, hoping to catch UAF off-guard while international attention is fragmented by other crises. (CONFIDENCE: LOW, but high impact).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • IO: Monitor for increased Russian amplification of G7 'disunity' narratives.
  • Ground: Continue monitoring Krasnolimansk axis for sustained Russian pressure or further claims of disrupted UAF rotations.
• Short-term (Next 3-12 hours):
  • Diplomatic/IO: UAF diplomatic and IO channels must clarify the G7 situation and proactively counter Russian exploitation.
  • Ground: Assess if Rybar's "2 days" message foreshadows immediate tactical activity or is merely psychological warfare.
• Medium-term (Next 12-48 hours):
  • Strategic: Observe if the Kellogg-Lukashenko meeting yields any public statements or implications for Belarus's role in the conflict.
  • Ground: Monitor for any shift in Russian ground force deployments that could correspond to the "MDCOA" of a new axis offensive.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• GAP 2 (UPDATED): VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN CLAIMS OF UKRAINIAN SHELLING IN KURSK OBLAST (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE, HYPER-PRIORITY): (No new info, continued from previous report).
• GAP 67 (UPDATED): RUSSIAN INTERNAL PROPAGANDA / DISINFORMATION (HIGH, UPDATED FOCUS):
  • Analyze the T-90M "Proryv" and 2S19 Msta-S videos for specific tactical insights, unit markings, and any subtle indicators of equipment status or crew morale beyond overt propaganda. (PRIORITY: HIGH).
  • URGENT: Investigate the source and intent behind Rybar's "До двух суток до начала войны" message. Is it a historical repost, a new cryptic threat, or a psychological operation? Correlate with any other unusual Russian milblogger activity. (PRIORITY: HIGH).
• NEW GAP 86: G7 JOINT STATEMENT STATUS (CRITICAL, IMMEDIATE):
  • URGENTLY VERIFY the accuracy of the RBC-Ukraine report concerning the absence of a joint G7 statement on Ukraine. Determine the specific reasons if true, and if this indicates a genuine fracture in unity or a different diplomatic approach. Obtain official statements or background briefings from G7 members. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• NEW GAP 87: KELLOGG-LUKASHENKO MEETING IMPLICATIONS (HIGH):
  • Monitor US and Belarusian official statements regarding the Kellogg-Lukashenko meeting. Assess the agenda, key topics discussed, and any implications for Belarus's stance or potential role in the conflict, or for US diplomatic efforts in the region. (PRIORITY: HIGH).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION OF G7 STATEMENT STATUS. Task all-source ISR to immediately confirm or deny the RBC-Ukraine report on the G7 joint statement. This directly impacts our ability to counter Russian narratives of Western disunity. (Supports CR 86).
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: ASSESS RYBAR'S CRYPTIC MESSAGE. Task OSINT analysts to immediately investigate the source, context, and potential intent of Rybar's "2 days before the war" message. Determine if it is a precursor to a new significant event. (Supports CR 67).
  3. ONGOING: Maintain heightened ISR over all axes for signs of Russian tactical adaptation (e.g., further "cope cage" variants, FPV drone integration on armored vehicles) and any force generation activity supporting new offensives.
  4. ONGOING: Continue monitoring Russian internal media (TASS) for insights into military procurement, logistics, and internal governance, even seemingly mundane reports like financial disputes can offer clues about systemic issues.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. ONGOING: Maintain current posture and recommendations from previous ISR. Anticipate continued Russian efforts to defeat UAF AD, potentially with further adapted equipment or tactics.

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Review defensive plans for the Krasnolimansk axis, specifically regarding counter-mobility and anti-armor measures, in light of reported T-90M activity. Re-evaluate UAF rotation procedures for vulnerabilities.
  2. ONGOING: Maintain vigilance and readiness for offensive operations on all axes, particularly if Rybar's message is a genuine precursor to escalation.

• Information Operations & Diplomatic:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: PROACTIVELY ADDRESS G7 STATEMENT. If the RBC-Ukraine report is accurate, immediately prepare and disseminate clear, coordinated messaging from the UAF and the Office of the President to clarify the G7's continued support for Ukraine, emphasizing concrete actions and outcomes rather than solely joint statements. Counter any Russian attempts to exploit this. (Supports CR 86).
  2. IMMEDIATE: COUNTER RUSSIAN MILITARY PROPAGANDA. Rapidly analyze and, where appropriate, debunk or contextualize Russian propaganda videos (T-90M, Msta-S) to prevent them from boosting enemy morale or demoralizing UAF. Highlight the defensive nature of UAF operations.
  3. IMMEDIATE: CLARIFY RYBAR'S MESSAGE. If Rybar's "2 days" message gains traction, prepare a response that either dismisses it as typical Russian psychological warfare or issues a warning if it is assessed to be a genuine precursor.
  4. DIPLOMATIC: Engage with US and Belarusian counterparts to gain insight into the Kellogg-Lukashenko meeting and its implications for the region. (Supports CR 87).

---