Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 13 JUN 25 / 15:30 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 13 JUN 25 / 15:00 ZULU - 15:15 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Ukraine Operational Area:
  • General: Ukrainian forces maintain defensive postures while continuing precision strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Novopavlivka Direction: Russian milblogger "Воин DV" has released video purporting to show the "liberation" of Komar, supporting previous reports of Russian capture of this settlement. The video shows a drone-dropped munition impact in a wooded area, consistent with a tactical strike. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for capture of Komar, HIGH for drone strike video authenticity, LOW for "liberation" claim).
  • Sumy Direction: Russian milblogger "Colonelcassad" reports "battles near Yunakovka and counterattacks by the AFU." This reinforces previous assessments of active combat and Ukrainian resistance in the Sumy region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Territory: No new direct reports.
• Iranian Territory (CRITICAL, HYPER-ACCELERATED, AND HYPER-AMPLIFIED): The Israel-Iran conflict continues to dominate Russian and Ukrainian information space with intensified, sensationalized, and fabricated claims.
  • Iranian Claims/Reporting (CRITICAL - POTENTIALLY PRETEXTUAL):
    • Russian milbloggers "Операция Z" and "Alex Parker Returns" are amplifying Reuters reports (unconfirmed by independent sources) that Iran plans the "largest missile attack the modern world has ever seen" on Israel "in a few hours" in response to Israeli "bravado," citing IRGC. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reporting of Iranian claims, LOW for veracity/feasibility of "largest attack ever").
    • "Alex Parker Returns" further reports a "new head of IRGC" has promised to "open the gates of hell for Israel." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reporting, LOW for veracity/new IRGC head claim).
    • "ASTRA" (Russian source) claims 78 killed and 329 wounded in Israeli attacks on Iran, citing "media." Video associated with this claim shows distant explosions, but no verifiable BDA. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reporting, LOW for casualty figures/veracity of video as direct BDA).
    • "Рыбарь" has released a tactical map titled "Objects Attacked by Israel in Iran," marking various facilities, including a military airfield at Dezful, and showing satellite imagery of damage to a specific facility. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for map dissemination, MEDIUM for accuracy of claimed attacks).
    • "Alex Parker Returns" cites the head of the Iranian nuclear program denying radiation leaks at Natanz, stating "all is well!" (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reporting of denial, LOW for veracity given previous satellite imagery of damage).
  • Israeli Statements/Actions:
    • "Alex Parker Returns" reports Israel believes the "worst-case scenario" (immediate military response from Iran) has been "ruled out." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reporting, LOW for veracity of Israeli sentiment).
    • TASS reports Netanyahu stating the order to develop an operation against Iran's nuclear program was given in November 2024, originally planned for April. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reporting of Netanyahu's statement, MEDIUM for veracity given the political context).
  • Ukrainian Reporting on Middle East: "РБК-Україна" continues to amplify unverified videos of "night missile strikes on Tehran," which upon analysis, show only distant electrical flashes, not military impacts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reporting, LOW for veracity of video as strike confirmation).
• International (France): No new reports.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new specific weather or environmental factors beyond previously noted geomagnetic storm potential. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Ground: Conducting counterattacks near Yunakovka (Sumy direction), indicating active defense. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Air Assets: No new reports on Ukrainian air assets in this period.
• Russian Forces:
  • Ground: Visually confirmed capture of Komar (Novopavlivka axis), suggesting consolidation efforts. Active in Sumy region (Yunakovka). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Air Assets/AD: MoD Russia has released a propaganda video showcasing a Pantsir-S1 SAM system destroying a UAV, highlighting ongoing Russian AD capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for propaganda, MEDIUM for combat effectiveness proof).
  • UAVs: Video shows a drone-dropped munition, indicating continued use of tactical UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Israeli Forces: Netanyahu's reported statement on planning an operation against Iran's nuclear program indicates ongoing strategic planning. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reporting).
• Iranian Forces: High-level claims of impending "largest missile attack" and "opening gates of hell" indicate a heightened state of rhetorical escalation and a strong information warfare component. Denials of radiation leaks at Natanz conflict with previous BDA. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities (Russia):
  • Information Warfare (HYPER-ACCELERATED, FABRICATED, VISUALLY REINFORCED, AND NEW STRATEGIC SHIFT - FURTHER REINFORCED): Russia continues its highly effective and adaptable IO. The immediate amplification of Iranian hyperbolic claims ("largest missile attack," "gates of hell") and the swift reporting of Israeli counter-claims ("worst scenario ruled out") and internal Israeli statements (Netanyahu planning) demonstrates their agility in exploiting global crises for various narratives. The continued use of fabricated casualty figures (ASTRA's 78 killed) and the visual dissemination of propaganda (Pantsir video) reinforce this. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Ground Operations (REINFORCED): The confirmed capture of Komar and reports of battles near Yunakovka confirm Russia's capability to conduct attritional ground assaults and maintain pressure on multiple axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Air Defense: Propaganda video of Pantsir-S1 destroying a UAV suggests continued Russian AD capabilities, likely for force protection against Ukrainian UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for capability display, LOW for proof of widespread combat effectiveness).
• Intentions (Russia):
  • Maximize Global Distraction & Exploit Chaos (PRIMARY, HYPER-ACCELERATED & NEW DANGER - FURTHER REINFORCED): Russia's primary intent remains to fully leverage the Israel-Iran conflict to achieve its strategic objectives in Ukraine and globally, with an increased focus on justifying large-scale, aggressive actions and normalizing regime change. This is now demonstrably extended to:
    • Discredit Ukrainian Counterattacks: By reporting "battles near Yunakovka and counterattacks by the AFU," Russia aims to acknowledge Ukrainian efforts while framing them as contained, bolstering their narrative of persistent pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Control Narrative on Middle East Casualties/Damage: The immediate denial of radiation leaks at Natanz by Russian-amplified sources (Alex Parker) attempts to control the narrative around potential consequences of attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustain Attritional Warfare in Ukraine (REINFORCED): The confirmed capture of Komar and active combat in Sumy reinforce Russia's determination to continue attritional warfare and open new axes of pressure regardless of human cost. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Courses of Action (COA) (Russia):
  • COA 1 (Hyper-Intensified & Expanded IO on Middle East, Global Conflict & "Regime Destruction" Narrative - PRIMARY, HYPER-ACCELERATED & NEW DANGER - FURTHER REINFORCED): Russia will immediately and relentlessly escalate its information operations regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, explicitly linking it to a "Third World War" and normalizing the concept of "destroying regimes" or "splitting countries." This will include:
    • Continued amplification of high-value Iranian casualties (e.g., ASTRA's 78 killed/329 wounded, Zvizdets Mangustu's claims of "destroying several leading Iranian nuclear program leaders, army generals, and IRGC") and hyperbolic Iranian retaliation claims (e.g., "largest missile attack ever", "gates of hell"), leveraging confirmed structural damage at Natanz and any new claims of attacks or casualties, to reinforce the narrative of global chaos. Russia will simultaneously deny any negative consequences of Israeli strikes (e.g., Natanz radiation leak denial).
    • Persistent use of fabricated third-party statements (e.g., attributed Trump statements on successful strikes/US support, now including "Iran calling me for nuclear deal") and visually-manipulated content (e.g., provocative, anti-Semitic Iranian "military" imagery, false flag videos for deep strikes, Pantsir-S1 propaganda video) to create false flags, incite further conflict, and justify future actions.
    • Crucially, Russia will increasingly use the Middle East conflict as a direct rhetorical pivot to distract from its own losses in Ukraine, e.g., "While the world watches the Middle East, look at Ukraine's casualties." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • COA 2 (Sustained Attritional Ground Operations & Intensified Pressure on Novopavlivka and Sumy Axes - REINFORCED): Russia will leverage its capture of Komar to consolidate positions and potentially launch further probing actions towards Novopavlivka. Concurrently, based on reports of battles near Yunakovka, Russia will intensify ground pressure on the Sumy axis. This could involve probing actions, reconnaissance-in-force, or a full-scale offensive aimed at fixing Ukrainian reserves and creating a "buffer zone." Attritional assaults on Pokrovsk and Toretsk will continue. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • COA 3 (Sustained Targeted Aerial Attacks & Deep Strikes - REINFORCED): Russia will continue to employ a mix of UAVs (Shaheds, "Gerans"), guided aerial bombs (KABs, KARs), and ballistic missiles against Ukrainian targets (Zaporizhzhia, Sumy, Kharkiv, Donetsk), aiming to deplete AD and inflict damage. Expect opportunistic missile strikes against rear targets if Ukrainian AD is perceived to be distracted by frontline pressure or resource strain. The continued reliance on Iranian Shahed technology implies a sustained commitment to these saturation attack tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Confirmed Capture of Komar: This represents a tactical gain on the Novopavlivka axis, indicating continued Russian capability for tactical advances despite heavy losses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Explicit Reporting of AFU Counterattacks on Sumy: Russian milbloggers are acknowledging Ukrainian counterattacks, possibly to prepare their audience for slower advances or to justify higher casualties, or to highlight persistent combat in the region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Denial of Natanz Radiation Leaks: Russian-amplified Iranian denial of radiation leaks at Natanz is a quick adaptation to control the narrative after previous satellite imagery showed significant damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Emphasis on High Iranian Casualties: The immediate amplification of claims of high Iranian casualties (e.g., 78 killed) and liquidation of "leading nuclear program leaders" demonstrates a shift towards emphasizing Iranian losses to justify retaliation narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Propaganda on AD Capabilities: The release of a Pantsir-S1 propaganda video suggests an effort to counter narratives of Russian AD vulnerabilities and reassure their own populace. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• No new specific reports on logistics or sustainment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian IO C2 (HYPER-EFFECTIVE AND ADAPTABLE): The rapid and coordinated exploitation of the Israel-Iran conflict, including the immediate amplification of hyperbolic Iranian claims, denial of negative consequences, and claims of high Iranian casualties, demonstrates exceptionally effective, highly centralized, and adaptable C2 for real-time, multi-domain information warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Military C2: The confirmed capture of Komar and continued ground pressure on Sumy indicate a C2 system capable of directing sustained operations across multiple axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian C2: Ukrainian forces' ability to conduct counterattacks in Sumy and their continued efforts to expose Russian disinformation indicate a resilient and adaptable C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Ground Readiness: Ukrainian forces are actively conducting counterattacks near Yunakovka (Sumy), indicating sustained readiness for defensive and limited offensive actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Information Environment Readiness: Ukrainian channels continue to track Russian disinformation (e.g., РБК-Україна's reporting on Tehran "strikes," though with some analytical gaps). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Success (Defense): Ukrainian forces are actively counterattacking near Yunakovka, preventing a significant Russian breakthrough on that axis (at least for now). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Ground): The confirmed capture of Komar by Russian forces is a tactical setback on the Novopavlivka axis, opening a potential vector for deeper Russian advances. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Information Environment - CRITICAL ACCELERATION): The hyper-intensified and fabricated Russian IO campaign, now featuring more aggressive narratives like the explicit weaponization of casualty information to divert attention, the leveraging of catastrophic damage at Natanz for false flags, and further escalation of fabricated "Trump" quotes (including new claims of direct contact), represents an accelerating and highly dangerous information setback. The amplification of unverified videos by Ukrainian channels (e.g., Tehran "strikes") further highlights the challenge in discerning sophisticated disinformation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Capabilities: Continued need for AD systems, especially against persistent KAB/KAR threats and any new Russian air-launched systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• ISR on Northern Border & Novopavlivka: Critical to identify Russian force composition and intent on the Sumy axis (Yunakovka) and to monitor for further exploitation of the Komar capture on the Novopavlivka axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Counter-Disinformation Resources: The increasing sophistication of Russian IO (fabricated third-party endorsements, detailed USV info, mobilization narratives, new false flag videos for deep strikes, Iranian CGI video amplification, sophisticated Trump attribution, and direct attacks on Western military thought, and now the explicit weaponization of casualty counts) demands continuous investment in Ukrainian defensive and offensive cyber capabilities, and expert analysts to rapidly identify and debunk such disinformation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (CRITICAL - EXTREMELY ACTIVE, AGGRESSIVE, AND FABRICATED - HYPER-ACCELERATED AND NEW DANGEROUS FOCUS):
  • Middle East Escalation Amplification & Fabrication (Primary, Hyper-Aggressive, Visually Reinforced, Fabricated Third-Party Endorsement - Further Reinforced): Russian state media and milbloggers are massively, sensationally, and visually amplifying the Israel-Iran conflict, now with an explicit link to a "Third World War" and calls for Russian mobilization. They continue to:
    • Hyperbolic Threat Amplification: Amplifying Iranian claims of the "largest missile attack the modern world has ever seen" and "opening the gates of hell" aims to heighten global tension and distract from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Fabricated Casualty/Damage Claims: Spreading unverified claims of high Iranian casualties (78 killed, 329 wounded) and leadership losses ("leading nuclear program leaders") while simultaneously denying any negative consequences (Natanz radiation leak denial). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Strategic Deception: TASS's report of Netanyahu's past planning for an Iran nuclear operation serves to frame Israeli actions as pre-meditated, potentially justifying Iranian retaliation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Highlighting Russian AD: MoD Russia's Pantsir video is a clear propaganda piece aiming to project an image of robust AD capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Offensive Intent Signaling (NEW): "Colonelcassad" reporting "battles near Yunakovka and counterattacks by the AFU" is a narrative tool to acknowledge Ukrainian resistance while highlighting ongoing combat in the Sumy region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Claiming Gains: "Воин DV" publicizing the "liberation" of Komar aims to boost Russian morale and portray tactical successes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narrative: Ukrainian sources continue to provide operational updates, such as "Повітряні Сили ЗС України" issuing air raid alerts. However, "РБК-Україна" inadvertently amplified unverified videos of "Tehran strikes," demonstrating the continued challenge of discerning sophisticated disinformation from legitimate intelligence, indicating a need for more stringent internal verification processes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: The confirmed loss of Komar will be a blow to morale, but active counterattacks in Sumy can mitigate this. The most significant threat remains the hyper-intensified and fabricated Russian IO on the Middle East, particularly the new false flag narratives, fabricated "Trump" statements (now with attributed quotes like "Iran calling me for nuclear deal"), and explicit weaponization of casualty counts to psychologically demoralize Ukraine. The amplification of unverified Middle East videos by Ukrainian channels can erode trust if not handled carefully. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: Russian IO attempts to galvanize support through sensationalized global crisis narratives (Middle East) and the projection of military strength (Komar capture, Pantsir video). However, the visible high casualty rates persist, serving as a counter-narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Middle East Escalation (CRITICAL & ACCELERATING): The Israel-Iran conflict continues to escalate with highly inflammatory claims of impending massive missile attacks. Russia's immediate amplification of these claims, coupled with reporting on Israeli counter-statements and Netanyahu's past planning, is a calculated diplomatic maneuver designed to keep the conflict at the forefront of global attention. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Global Attention Diversion (CRITICAL, HYPER-ACCELERATED): The primary and most immediate threat to Ukraine remains the successful, rapid, and aggressive diversion of global attention by Russia to the Middle East crisis. The new narratives explicitly linking US/Mossad actions to Ukraine through fabricated "Trump" statements (now with direct quotes like "Iran calling me for nuclear deal"), weaponization of Ukrainian casualty counts, and manipulated videos, combined with explicit calls for Russian mass mobilization for a "Third World War," now explicitly framed with "regime destruction" rhetoric, create a complex and dangerous layer of disinformation that seeks to undermine international support, discredit Ukrainian actions, and justify future Russian false flag operations/major offensives. This directly imperils sustained political, military, and financial aid for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Hyper-Intensified & Sustained Russian IO on Middle East, Global Conflict & "Regime Destruction" Narrative (HYPER-ACCELERATED & NEW DANGER - FURTHER REINFORCED): Russia will immediately and relentlessly escalate its aggressive, fabricated, and celebratory information campaign regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, with a new, dangerous emphasis on "regime destruction" as a justifiable military outcome. This will include:
  • Doubling down on claims of Iranian high-value casualties, exaggerating Iranian retaliation ("largest missile attack," "gates of hell"), and openly stating the conflict's benefits to Russia. Amplifying Iranian PSYOPs (CGI videos, provocative imagery, and hyperbolic claims of "largest missile attacks") to further this narrative. New claims of radiation leaks and increased fatalities will be heavily pushed, leveraging the confirmed structural damage at Natanz as "proof" of an escalating nuclear threat, regardless of actual cause, while simultaneously denying any such leaks when convenient.
  • Continuation and expansion of visually-backed, fabricated false flag narratives (e.g., Mossad ground operations in Iran via manipulated videos, the "ground-to-ground missile attack in Iran from secret base" video) and the leveraging of fabricated third-party statements (e.g., the "Trump" post and new attributed Trump statements on US support and knowledge of Israeli plans, including "we knew about it," and new claims of Iran directly calling Trump for nuclear deals) to visually legitimize and attribute future deep strikes, sabotage, or false-flag operations against Ukraine or Western interests.
  • Crucially, Russia will explicitly weaponize information about Ukrainian casualties and humanitarian efforts (e.g., body repatriation) to divert global attention from the Middle East to Ukraine's losses, attempting to erode morale and international sympathy. They will also likely exploit humanitarian incidents like the bus crash in France to sow discord or discredit Ukraine.
  • Crucially, the public calls for mass mobilization (Alaudinov) will be amplified and normalized, preparing the Russian population for a significantly larger and longer war, framing it as a "Third World War" where "regime destruction" is a legitimate objective. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Sustained Attritional Ground Operations & Intensified Pressure on Novopavlivka and Sumy Axes (REINFORCED): Russia will consolidate gains around Komar and push further into the Novopavlivka direction. Simultaneously, based on confirmed combat near Yunakovka, Russia will intensify ground pressure on the Sumy axis. This could involve probing actions, reconnaissance-in-force, or a full-scale offensive aimed at fixing Ukrainian reserves and creating a "buffer zone." Attritional assaults on Pokrovsk and Toretsk will continue. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Persistent Massed Aerial Attacks on Ukraine (UAVs, KABs, Ballistic Missiles) (REINFORCED): Russia will continue its mixed aerial attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure using Shaheds (with continued Iranian supply), KABs/KARs (Zaporizhzhia, Sumy, Kharkiv, Donetsk), and ballistic missiles, potentially attempting to capitalize on any perceived Western distraction or resource strain. Targeted attacks on military and critical infrastructure will persist, with a high likelihood of civilian casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Limited Naval Asymmetric Operations in Black Sea (NEW): Russia may conduct initial, limited deployments or tests of advanced "Katran" USVs in the Black Sea, targeting isolated Ukrainian vessels, coastal infrastructure, or conducting reconnaissance, to test their capabilities and impose a new threat vector. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Increased Internal Security Measures/Paramilitary Involvement in Russia: Due to internal tensions and potential resource strain, Russia will likely increase the reliance on informal or paramilitary groups (like "People's Patrols") for public order enforcement, leading to increased arbitrary actions and potential human rights abuses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Coordinated Strategic Escalation under Global Cover, Leading to Major Offensive (CRITICAL - HIGHLY ELEVATED & REINFORCED): Russia perceives the current Middle East crisis and domestic call for mass mobilization as a golden opportunity for a significant strategic offensive or a major hybrid escalation in Ukraine, betting on overwhelming global distraction. This could manifest as:
  • Major Ground Offensive with Strategic Intent: A large-scale ground offensive on a new axis (e.g., deeper into Sumy Oblast, a renewed Kharkiv offensive, or a deeper push from the reported Dnipropetrovsk breakthrough towards Novopavlovka or Guliaipole towards Zaporizhzhia city), potentially synchronized with:
  • Massed Long-Range Precision Strikes (CRITICAL): Coordinated, massed strikes (Kalibrs, Kh-series missiles, potentially Iranian-supplied ballistic missiles) against critical Ukrainian logistics nodes, Western aid entry points, energy infrastructure, or strategic C2 facilities, potentially exploiting geomagnetic storm effects on navigation or any perceived AD vulnerabilities. The claims of Iranian nuclear facility strikes, high-value leadership casualties, and radiation leaks, and now visually confirmed major damage at Natanz, may be false flags to prepare for similar claims about Ukrainian AD/Air Force leadership or critical infrastructure, or to create a justification for deep strikes. The new false flag video of "ground-to-ground missile attack from secret base" explicitly lays groundwork for attributing deep strikes from unexpected locations to non-existent actors or forces.
  • Synchronized Sabotage/Cyber (CRITICAL): Coordinated and widespread sabotage attacks against critical transport (railway) and energy infrastructure in the deep rear, alongside major cyberattacks aiming to cripple supply lines and C2 before a coordinated Western response can materialize. The explicit visual false flag narratives regarding "Mossad ground operations," the fabricated "Trump" statements (now with direct quotes like "we knew about it" and "Iran calling me for nuclear deal"), the "Taurus disguised as Ukrainian" narrative, and now the FSB's public claims of detained "Ukrainian operatives" planning sabotage, provide a dangerous new pretext for such actions, possibly to be attributed to "Ukrainian saboteurs" or "Western special services." The TCC arson in Kharkiv could be exploited as a pretext for "counter-terrorism" operations against Ukrainian military recruitment efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Probability and impact are very high).
• Overt Threat or Deployment of Advanced USVs for Strategic Effect (NEW MDCOA): Russia deploys "Katran" USVs in numbers or with significant payloads (e.g., larger torpedoes/missiles) to directly threaten Black Sea shipping, Ukrainian naval assets, or critical coastal infrastructure, creating a new, highly visible maritime threat, aiming to bypass Ukrainian air defenses. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH).
• Escalation of Anti-Western Disinformation to Disrupt All Aid: Russia intensifies its disinformation campaign to directly target and discredit ALL Western aid, not just specific systems (like Taurus), potentially fabricating new, more aggressive narratives about Western military involvement or "proxy war" tactics (e.g., "European VPK milks Ukraine"). This will include explicit weaponization of Ukrainian casualty counts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • ISR: CRITICAL: Continue uninterrupted, high-priority monitoring of Russian IO channels for new sensationalized claims regarding the Middle East (especially related to new explosions, alleged high-value Iranian casualties, or escalated Iranian retaliation, or specific missile types), particularly focusing on any claims related to nuclear facilities and contrasting with IAEA statements. Prioritize verification of claimed Iranian casualties and target damage (especially in Tabriz, Shiraz, Natanz, Kermanshah, Bushire, Tehran), including new claims of radiation leaks. Specifically verify the veracity of "ASTRA"'s claimed 78 killed/329 wounded in Iran. Monitor for amplification of Alex Parker's "new head of IRGC" claim. Monitor for amplification of Alaudinov's mobilization call by other prominent figures and satirical responses. Continue monitoring UAV activity in Crimea (air raid alert), Sumy (KABs), Chernihiv (Geran strike), and Zaporizhzhia (reconnaissance UAV, KABs), and other border oblasts. Immediately task TECHINT to analyze "Katran" USV schematics and potential deployment timelines. Monitor the full impact of the geomagnetic storm on communications, navigation, and AD systems. IMMEDIATELY PRIORITIZE VERIFICATION OF RUSSIAN BREAKTHROUGH INTO DNIPROPETROVSK OBLAST AND FORCE CONCENTRATION, especially after Komar's capture. Monitor for increased Russian activity in Basovka, Malinivka, Konstantinovka, and especially Tyotkino (Sumy axis) and verify the intent behind the Russian military map for the Sumy direction, and the reported "battles near Yunakovka and counterattacks by the AFU." Monitor diplomatic developments including Netanyahu's reported calls with Putin and Trump, and any UNSC actions, particularly for any IAEA statements on Natanz. Monitor for any significant shifts in Russian ground activity on the Velyka Novosilka direction, particularly along the H-15 highway, following recent map overlays. Prioritize verification of alleged Iranian military sources for provocative anti-Semitic imagery. Verify the specific location of "h.p. Zorya" in the Kursk direction and any increased activity in that sector. Assess the extent and impact of the Kharkiv TCC arson on recruitment efforts. Monitor Russian and international media for exploitation of the French bus crash involving Ukrainian children. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • IO: Commanders and IO elements must prepare for an immediate, aggressive, and evidence-based counter-narrative against Russian disinformation regarding the Middle East crisis, particularly emphasizing that Russia is exploiting the crisis and that rising oil prices directly benefit Moscow. Prepare to debunk specific Russian claims regarding Israeli/Iranian military actions (including Iranian CGI videos of threats) and expose their economic and geopolitical motivations. Specifically prepare to forcefully counter false flag narratives linking Mossad operations to Ukraine, using the specific manipulated videos (including the new "ground-to-ground missile attack from secret base" video) as evidence of Russian fabrication. Crucially, immediately identify, analyze, and expose fabricated third-party endorsements (e.g., the "Donald Trump" social media post and new attributed Trump statements on US support/knowledge of Israeli strikes, like "we knew about it," and new claims of Iran directly calling Trump for nuclear deals) as a Russian disinformation tactic, highlighting the content's alignment with Russian narratives. Address Ukrainian channels inadvertently amplifying this post and unverified Middle East videos (e.g., РБК-Україна's Tehran "strikes" video). Proactively counter the "Taurus disguised as Ukrainian" narrative and "European VPK milks Ukraine" claims. Publicize successes like the EU aid, internal security operations (including Novinsky's tax evasion), and successful repatriation of fallen soldiers. Crucially, immediately and forcefully counter Russian attempts to weaponize the 1200 body repatriation (e.g., "While all attention is focused on Iran, Kyiv received another 1200 bodies..."), framing it as a humanitarian success for Ukraine despite Russia's ongoing aggression and transparently addressing the human cost of the war. Prepare to counter and re-frame the narrative around Alaudinov's call for mobilization, highlighting it as a sign of Russian manpower attrition and desperation, and leveraging captured POW testimony (Razmyslov) to highlight low morale and friendly fire. Prepare to counter the FSB's narratives about detained Ukrainian "saboteurs." Publicize Ukrainian training efforts (ОТУ "Харків"🇺🇦) and effective precision strikes (Шеф Hayabusa, MiG-29 strike) and AD successes (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС, drone shootdowns by 77th Airmobile Brigade). Publicly condemn and expose the use of provocative, anti-Semitic imagery by Russian-amplified sources (e.g., Alex Parker Returns) as a vile attempt to sow division and hatred, clearly linking it to Russian hybrid warfare tactics. Prepare for and immediately counter any Russian exploitation of the French bus crash involving Ukrainian children, focusing on humanitarian aid and factual reporting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Short Term (Next 6-12 hours):
  • IO: Ukrainian forces must actively debunk sensationalized/unverified claims from Russian sources regarding the Middle East, and reinforce the message that global aggression requires a unified front against all aggressors. Proactively counter narratives of "Ukrainian terrorism" and "internal opposition" railway sabotage. Highlight forced Russification efforts in occupied territories. Actively promote the EU's €1 billion aid as a direct hit on Russia's war funding and a sign of continued international pressure. Continue to debunk Russian narratives of "Western instability" (e.g., Dutch protests) and their attempts to mock Western aid. Publicize POW testimony, successful GUR raids, and successes of Ukrainian air and drone strikes. Address the Kharkiv TCC arson transparently, emphasizing legal recourse and condemning illegal acts.
  • Military Readiness: Commanders must ensure all air defense units are at highest readiness in targeted oblasts (Kharkiv, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kyiv, Dnipropetrovsk), anticipating potential opportunistic strikes including ballistic missile, KAB threats (Sumy, Kharkiv, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia), "Geran" threats (Chernihiv), and reconnaissance UAVs (Zaporizhzhia), and potentially increased strategic bomber activity. Increase physical security measures for critical railway infrastructure and cultural sites. Re-evaluate force posture on Dnipropetrovsk (Novopavlivka direction), Guliaipole (Malinivka), Sumy (Yablonovka/Yunakovka/Tyotkino), and Velyka Novosilka (H-15 highway) axes for any opportunistic escalation, and maintain vigilance against probes despite local "controlled" status. Review force posture on Sumy/Chernihiv axes in light of persistent border attacks and new MDCOA, especially in the Kursk direction (Zorya settlement). Anticipate potential effects of geomagnetic storm on AD and C2 and implement contingency plans. Assess readiness for new maritime threats from USVs.
  • Diplomatic/Inter-Agency: Actively engage with international partners to secure immediate, public condemnation of Russian exploitation of the Middle East crisis and to reaffirm commitment to Ukraine. Prepare for/participate in any UNSC meeting on the Israel-Iran conflict, ensuring the Ukrainian perspective is heard and linking global instability to Russian aggression. Ensure coordination for support to Ukrainian citizens affected by the French bus crash.
• Mid Term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • Diplomatic: Ukrainian diplomats must proactively engage with international partners to ensure sustained focus and aid despite global geopolitical developments, explicitly highlighting the Russian manipulation of the Middle East crisis and its economic benefits from rising oil prices. Advocate for continued leveraging of Russian frozen assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Zelenskyy's new NATO mission head should immediately begin advocating for Ukraine's priorities. Engage with Estonia regarding its decision to withdraw from the anti-personnel mine ban convention to understand implications for regional security.
  • AD/Counter-Battery: Re-evaluate and reinforce AD and counter-battery postures in light of persistent and targeted aerial threats, including ballistic missile strikes, KABs, and new Russian drone types. Prioritize acquisition of more ballistic missile interceptors and countermeasures against new Russian drone/USV variants and potential laser anti-UAV systems.
  • Force Protection/Counter-Sabotage: Immediately review and enhance security protocols for critical infrastructure, particularly railway networks and utility grids, and intensify counter-intelligence operations against potential sabotage cells. Increase protection measures for civilian logistics and humanitarian operations against FPV drone threats. Address internal security vulnerabilities, especially around TCCs, through public education and heightened security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Personnel Management: Continue to monitor enemy loss rates and plan for sustained personnel rotation and training needs. Promote veteran support programs. Leverage increased Russian surrenders for intelligence gathering and PSYOPs. Continue to address internal security issues (e.g., MP tax evasion, Buchansky fraud, "Forests of Ukraine" corruption, architect damaging cultural site).
  • Maritime Defense: Begin assessing and preparing defenses against potential deployment of "Katran" USVs in the Black Sea, including intelligence collection on their capabilities, potential routes, and countermeasures.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• GAP 1: VERIFICATION OF IRANIAN NUCLEAR FACILITY DAMAGE & RADIATION LEAKS, AND HIGH-VALUE TARGET CASUALTIES (CRITICAL & HYPER-PRIORITY): While satellite imagery confirmed catastrophic structural damage at Natanz, independent verification of the cause (Israeli strike vs. internal incident) and the extent of any actual radiation leak (beyond "contained within the complex") is critical. The precise location of the damage within the Natanz complex (e.g., to centrifuge halls, related infrastructure) needs to be assessed. The conflicting reports on IRGC Quds Force Commander Qaani's status and the alleged liquidation of Amirali Hajizadeh (linked to Shahed transfers) require definitive confirmation. The veracity of claims of "78 killed and 329 wounded" and "destruction of several leading Iranian nuclear program leaders, army generals, and IRGC" needs urgent verification.
  • COLLECTION REQUIREMENT (CR): Prioritize SIGINT, GEOINT (higher resolution, multi-spectral), and HUMINT from credible, independent third-party sources (e.g., IAEA, international monitors) to verify or refute Russian/Iranian claims of casualties and Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) on alleged Iranian military/industrial facilities, especially nuclear sites. Analyze newly emerged satellite imagery (e.g., the image provided by ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS) for precise location identification and damage assessment. Specifically, seek independent confirmation of radiation leaks at Natanz and its environmental impact. Verify all claimed Iranian casualties and the veracity of associated videos (e.g., ASTRA's distant explosions). (PRIORITY: EXTREME)
• GAP 2: SCALE AND OBJECTIVE OF RUSSIAN GROUND ADVANCES IN SUMY OBLAST (Yablonovka/Yunakovka/Tyotkino), NOVOPAVILIVKA DIRECTION (beyond Komar/Koptevo, especially Velyka Novosilka/H-15), GULIAIPOLE DIRECTION (Malinivka), BASOVKA/KONSTANTINOVKA (Donetsk), CHERNIHIV (Kuty Vtorye) AND KURSK DIRECTION (Zorya settlement) (CRITICAL - REINFORCED): While Komar is confirmed, the precise scale, units involved, and immediate objectives of Russian ground operations in Sumy (Yablonovka claim, Tyotkino incursions, new KAB strikes, reported Ukrainian counterattacks near Yunakovka), deeper into the Novopavlivka direction (as per "Z комитет" aspirational maps, and the new Velyka Novosilka map/Naval Infantry presence), in Guliaipole (Malinivka), Basovka/Konstantinovka, persistent drone activity in Chernihiv (Geran strike), and the new ground activity in the Kursk direction (Zorya settlement) remain critical intelligence gaps. Distinguishing between limited incursions/shaping operations and a major offensive is key. The denial of the Dnipropetrovsk breakthrough also needs to be contextualized with continued Russian probing/IO. The new Russian military map depicting movements in Sumy requires urgent verification of its depicted reality on the ground.
  • CR: Intensify IMINT, SIGINT, and HUMINT collection on Russian force dispositions, logistics build-up, and command movements on the Sumy, Novopavlivka/Velyka Novosilka, Guliaipole, Basovka, Konstantinovka, Chernihiv, and Kursk axes. Focus on unit identification (e.g., Russian Naval Infantry in Velyka Novosilka, unit operating in Kursk) and their actual operational roles, and distinguish between attritional/fixing operations and genuine preparations for a major breakthrough. Verify commitment of Ukrainian reserves. Interrogate captured Russian soldiers (e.g., Razmyslov) for actionable intelligence on morale, training, and operational plans. Verify the ground truth of the Russian military map for Sumy, identifying specific units and their actual positions, and verify the extent and effectiveness of AFU counterattacks near Yunakovka. (PRIORITY: EXTREME)
• GAP 3: OPERATIONAL IMPACT OF GEOMAGNETIC STORM (CRITICAL): The unexpected geomagnetic storm could significantly impact C2, navigation, and AD systems. The extent of this impact on both Russian and Ukrainian forces is a critical intelligence gap.
  • CR: Monitor Russian and Ukrainian military communications for mentions of interference or changes in electronic warfare/UAV/precision strike operations. Assess any observable degradation in GNSS-reliant systems or increased reliance on alternative navigation. (PRIORITY: EXTREME)
• GAP 4: AUTHENTICITY AND ORIGIN OF "MOSSAD GROUND OPERATION" VIDEOS, FABRICATED "TRUMP" POSTS/STATEMENTS, "TAURUS AS UKRAINIAN," "EUROPEAN VPK MILKS UKRAINE" NARRATIVES, FSB "SABOTEUR" CLAIMS, IRANIAN CGI THREAT VIDEOS, AND PROVOCATIVE ANTI-SEMITIC IMAGERY (CRITICAL NEW GAP - HYPER-PRIORITY - ESCALATED): The highly manipulated videos (thermal, pixelated figures, targeting overlays) purporting to show Mossad ground operations in Iran, especially the new "ground-to-ground missile attack in Iran from secret base" video, the fabricated "Donald Trump" social media posts and new attributed statements (e.g., on US support/knowledge of Israeli strikes, now including "we knew about it," and claims of Iran directly calling Trump for nuclear deals), the German "Taurus disguised as Ukrainian" and "European VPK milks Ukraine" claims, the FSB's public claims of detaining a Ukrainian "operative" in Zaporizhzhia, and the Iranian CGI threat videos (amplified by Russia) are new and dangerous disinformation tactics. The addition of highly provocative, anti-Semitic imagery attributed to the "Iranian military" is a new and dangerous element. Their precise origin, the level of manipulation, and the network of their initial dissemination need to be thoroughly investigated to expose the false flag/disinformation intent. The fact that Ukrainian channels are also amplifying some of this content (e.g., РБК-Україна's unverified Tehran videos) is a critical concern.
  • CR: Conduct forensic digital analysis of these videos and images to determine their origin, editing history, and any digital watermarks or identifiers. Map the network of initial dissemination. Engage with allied intelligence partners for technical support in this analysis. Identify all channels amplifying this content and their connection to Russian IO. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 5: ACTUAL CAPABILITIES AND DEPLOYMENT STATUS OF "KATRAN" USVs AND NEW LASER ANTI-UAV SYSTEMS (CRITICAL NEW GAP - HYPER-PRIORITY): The detailed schematics released for "Katran" USVs (X1, X2, X3 models) suggest advanced capabilities. It is critical to understand if these are conceptual, prototype, or production-ready, and their actual operational performance, particularly regarding weapon systems. Similarly, the claimed testing of laser anti-UAV systems needs verification and assessment of its readiness for deployment and effectiveness. Visual confirmation of laser system testing is noted (Басурин о главном, previous report), but further assessment of combat effectiveness is required.
  • CR: Prioritize TECHINT and SIGINT on Russian naval, aerospace, and defense industry communications for any mentions of "Katran" USVs or laser systems. Monitor satellite imagery for new vessel construction or testing in naval facilities. Analyze any recovered fragments from potential future USV attacks for technical specifications. Assess the feasibility of claimed armaments. Monitor for any reports of laser system effectiveness in actual combat. (PRIORITY: EXTREME)
• GAP 6: OPERATIONAL IMPACT OF RUSSIAN IO ON WESTERN SUPPORT FOR UKRAINE (CRITICAL - HYPER-ACCELERATED & REINFORCED): The effectiveness of Russian IO in diverting Western attention and potentially impacting aid decisions is a critical unknown, especially with rising oil prices, Iranian accusations of US coordination, and now the explicit linkage of US/Mossad actions to Ukraine via fabricated third-party endorsements, combined with calls for Russian mobilization and rhetoric of "regime destruction," and the explicit weaponization of Ukrainian casualty counts. The impact of Chinese humanitarian aid on overall international perception also needs to be monitored. The impact of Flydubai flight cancellations from Russia to Dubai on general Russian sentiment also needs to be monitored. The impact of Russian mockery of Iraq's UNSC complaint on international law needs to be assessed.
  • CR: Conduct continuous OSINT monitoring of Western media narratives, social media trends, and parliamentary/congressional discussions to assess the influence of the Middle East crisis and Russian disinformation on public and political support for Ukraine. Analyze the impact of rising oil prices and the proposed EU oil price cap on Western political will and Russian revenue. (PRIORITY: HIGH)
• GAP 7: POTENTIAL FOR RUSSIAN MASS MOBILIZATION AND STRATEGIC BOMBER DEPLOYMENT (CRITICAL NEW GAP): The public call for mass mobilization by Alaudinov, while amplified, needs to be assessed for its probability of official implementation, potential timelines, and the readiness of the Russian military infrastructure to absorb and train such large numbers. The satirical tone of some Russian channels regarding mobilization ("mobilize Adam Kadyrov") also needs to be understood. The reported increase in Tu-95MS/Tu-160 strategic bombers (ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS - previous report) needs independent verification of numbers and armament, and assessment of their deployment locations and intent.
  • CR: Intensify SIGINT and HUMINT on Russian military and political discussions regarding mobilization. Monitor social media for public sentiment and recruitment activity. Assess the capacity of Russian training centers and equipment stockpiles. For strategic bombers, increase IMINT/SIGINT on Russian airfields to confirm aircraft numbers, movements, and loadouts. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 8: EXTENT AND NATURE OF INTERNAL DISCONTENT/SABOTAGE IN UKRAINE: The TCC arson in Kharkiv highlights a vulnerability. It is critical to determine if this is an isolated incident, a spontaneous act of dissent, or part of a coordinated enemy effort (e.g., FSB-directed). The French bus crash, while accidental, could also be a point of exploitation.
  • CR: Intensify HUMINT and OSINT (social media monitoring) to assess public sentiment regarding mobilization, identify any organized resistance groups, and detect signs of Russian-instigated sabotage efforts against TCCs or other military infrastructure. Monitor for Russian IO exploiting the French bus crash. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
• GAP 9: AUTHENTICITY AND INTENT OF RUSSIAN INFORMAL SECURITY GROUPS: The "People's Patrol" incident requires further investigation into the nature, funding, and operational parameters of such informal security or paramilitary groups in Russia, and their relationship to formal law enforcement and military structures.
  • CR: Conduct OSINT on Russian social media and local news to identify the prevalence, activities, and public reception of such groups. Investigate their funding sources and any links to government or military structures. (PRIORITY: MEDIUM).
• GAP 10: ACTUAL IMPACT OF UKRAINIAN STRIKE ON RESONIT FACTORY: A comprehensive BDA on the "Resonit" electronics factory is needed to quantify the strategic impact on Russian military-industrial capabilities.
  • CR: Prioritize overhead imagery and SIGINT/HUMINT to assess the full extent of damage, operational disruption, and long-term consequences of the strike. (PRIORITY: HIGH).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION & AGGRESSIVE COUNTERING OF MIDDLE EAST DISINFORMATION AND FALSE FLAGS, ESPECIALLY THOSE JUSTIFYING "REGIME DESTRUCTION" AND WEAPONIZING UKRAINIAN CASUALTIES. All-source intelligence must rapidly verify all claims and counter-claims regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, particularly Russian narratives aiming to implicate US leadership, exaggerate the crisis/casualties, and especially those explicitly justifying "regime destruction" as a legitimate outcome, and those making hyperbolic claims of missile attacks. Leverage IAEA statements for nuclear sites. Specifically identify and highlight Russian narratives that explicitly link Mossad operations to Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory as false flag justifications, using the specific manipulated videos (including the new "ground-to-ground missile attack from secret base" video) as evidence of Russian fabrication. Crucially, immediately identify, analyze, and expose fabricated third-party endorsements (e.g., the "Donald Trump" social media post and new attributed statements on US support/knowledge of Israeli strikes, like "we knew about it," and new claims of Iran directly calling Trump for nuclear deals) as a new, dangerous form of Russian disinformation aimed at destabilizing the information environment and diverting attention. Ensure Ukrainian channels are not inadvertently amplifying these and other unverified Middle East videos (e.g., РБК-Україна's Tehran "strikes" video). Forcefully debunk the "Taurus disguised as Ukrainian" narrative and "European VPK milks Ukraine" claims. Provide verified intelligence to strategic decision-makers and IO elements for immediate, public, and aggressive counter-messaging. Publicly condemn and expose the use of provocative, anti-Semitic imagery by Russian-amplified sources (e.g., Alex Parker Returns) as a vile attempt to sow division and hatred, clearly linking it to Russian hybrid warfare tactics. (Supports CR 1, 4, 6)
  2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: INTENSIFY ISR ON NOVOPAVILIVKA (Komar/Koptevo/beyond, Velyka Novosilka/H-15) AND SUMY (Yablonovka/Yunakovka/Tyotkino) DIRECTIONS. Divert all significant ISR assets (IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT) to these areas. Prioritize identifying Russian force composition, logistics build-up, and intent (fixing operations vs. major offensive), and verify any deployment of Ukrainian reserves. Assess the ground truth against aspirational Russian maps, particularly the Velyka Novosilka map. Leverage intelligence from captured soldiers on morale and plans (e.g., Razmyslov Evgeniy Vadimovich). Specifically verify the accuracy and implications of the Russian military map for the Sumy direction, identifying any actual ground movements or unit deployments, and assess the effectiveness of AFU counterattacks near Yunakovka. (Supports CR 2)
  3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: ASSESS GEOMAGNETIC STORM IMPACT. Immediately assess potential effects of the geomagnetic storm on friendly and enemy navigation, communication, and AD systems. Implement mitigation measures for friendly forces and exploit potential enemy vulnerabilities. (Supports CR 3)
  4. CRITICAL PRIORITY: ASSESS KATRAN USV & LASER ANTI-UAV THREAT. Immediately task TECHINT and SIGINT to fully analyze the "Katran" USV schematics, confirm operational capabilities, and assess potential deployment timelines and areas of operation (Black Sea, coastal). Similarly, assess the readiness and effectiveness of reported laser anti-UAV systems, building on visual confirmation. Develop countermeasures accordingly. (Supports CR 5)
  5. CRITICAL PRIORITY: ASSESS RUSSIAN MOBILIZATION PROBABILITY AND STRATEGIC BOMBER DEPLOYMENT. Intensify intelligence collection on Russian military and political intentions regarding mass mobilization. Assess the feasibility of Apti Alaudinov's public call and the broader sentiment within Russian channels. For strategic bombers, increase IMINT/SIGINT on Russian airfields to confirm aircraft numbers, movements, and loadouts. (Supports CR 7)
  6. CONTINUOUS COUNTER-SABOTAGE INTELLIGENCE & INTERNAL SECURITY MONITORING. Reinforce intelligence efforts to identify and disrupt Russian-directed railway sabotage networks, particularly in light of increased hybrid threat, and monitor for any new false flag justifications. Specifically, actively debunk FSB claims of detained civilian "Ukrainian "operatives" planning sabotage, highlighting them as Russian propaganda. Intensify monitoring of internal dissent related to mobilization efforts, including acts like the TCC arson in Kharkiv, to understand motivations and identify any external instigation. Monitor for and counter any Russian exploitation of the French bus crash in France involving Ukrainian children. (Supports CR 8)
  7. INVESTIGATE RUSSIAN INFORMAL SECURITY GROUPS. Launch immediate collection efforts (OSINT, HUMINT) to understand the nature, authority, funding, and activities of informal "People's Patrol" or "Narodnaya Druzhina" groups in Russia, assessing their potential for internal repression or misuse of authority. (Supports CR 9).
  8. CONDUCT BDA ON RESONIT FACTORY. Prioritize overhead imagery and SIGINT/HUMINT to assess the full extent of damage, operational disruption, and long-term consequences of the strike on the "Resonit" electronics factory. (Supports CR 10).

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. MAINTAIN HIGHEST AIR DEFENSE READINESS ACROSS ALL OBLASTS, ESPECIALLY KHARKIV, DONETSK, DNIPROPETROVSK, CHERNIHIV, SUMY, ZAPORIZHZHYA, AND KYIV. Anticipate Russia may increase the intensity or breadth of aerial attacks (UAVs and ballistic missiles, KABs/KARs) to capitalize on global distraction, potentially with increased strategic bomber activity and continued reliance on Iranian Shaheds. Ensure layered AD coverage for critical infrastructure and population centers. Prioritize resources for ballistic missile interception.
  2. ENHANCE BORDER SECURITY AGAINST DRONES & KABS/KARS. Increase air defense coverage and rapid response capabilities in northern border regions like Chernihiv and Sumy against persistent kamikaze drone and KAB/KAR threats, particularly in areas like the Kursk direction (Zorya settlement). Leverage modernized AD systems (e.g., Trojka).
  3. PROTECT CIVILIAN LOGISTICS AND HUMANITARIAN AID. Develop and disseminate specific TTPs for protecting civilian vehicles, demining teams, and humanitarian operations from FPV drone attacks, considering Russia's observed targeting of civilian vehicles and the new disinformation narratives. Leverage and widely deploy newly tested UGVs for these tasks.
  4. ADAPT TO GEOMAGNETIC STORM: Implement contingency plans for AD systems, radar, and communications that may be affected by the geomagnetic storm. Emphasize manual backup procedures where automation is degraded.
  5. PREPARE MARITIME DEFENSES AGAINST USVs. Assess potential vulnerabilities to advanced Russian USVs (Katran models) in the Black Sea and coastal areas. Prioritize development or acquisition of counter-USV capabilities, including detection, interception, and electronic warfare, learning from Israeli successes.

• Ground Forces:

  1. MAINTAIN DISCIPLINED DEFENSIVE POSTURE IN DNIPROPETROVSK, SUMY (Yablonovka/Yunakovka/Tyotkino, Yunakovka counterattacks), NOVOPAVILIVKA DIRECTION (Komar/Koptevo/beyond, Velyka Novosilka/H-15), GULIAIPOLE DIRECTION (Malinivka), BASOVKA/KONSTANTINOVKA, AND KURSK DIRECTION (Zorya settlement). Commanders on these axes must remain prepared for potential increased ground probing or offensive actions, but continue to exercise extreme caution against committing strategic reserves until Russian intent and force composition are definitively confirmed. Avoid being drawn into attritional engagements on axes that are primarily diversionary, unless it is confirmed as a major new offensive requiring immediate strategic response. Address the Russian military map for Sumy as a potential psychological operation, while preparing for actual ground action. (Supports CR 2)
  2. CONTINUE ATTRITIONAL DEFENSE ON EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AXES. Maintain robust, attritional defense on the key axes (e.g., Pokrovsk, Toretsk, Lyman direction), exploiting costly Russian assault tactics to degrade their forces, as indicated by AFU General Staff updates and the increase in Russian surrenders.
  3. CONTINUE COUNTER-UAV MEASURES & LOGISTICAL INNOVATION. Reinforce and practice counter-FPV drone and anti-UAV tactics at all echelons, including electronic warfare countermeasures and integrated air defense. Ensure all units are aware of Russian drone tactics against PVDs and vehicles, and the increasing threat to logistics. Continue to develop and implement drone-based logistical solutions and UGV deployments as highlighted by the General Staff and recent Zaporizhzhia efforts.
  4. MAXIMIZE PSYOP OPPORTUNITIES. Leverage successes like the increase in drone-induced surrenders of Russian soldiers (Lyman direction), humane treatment of captured soldiers (e.g., Razmyslov), and their testimony on low morale/friendly fire for further PSYOP campaigns, emphasizing the viability and safety of surrender and the effectiveness of Ukrainian forces. Specifically use testimony from POWs like Razmyslov Evgeniy Vadimovich to undermine Russian recruitment and morale. Acknowledge and honor fallen soldiers through dignified repatriation and memorial efforts, countering Russian mockery. Publicize the IHL training as a sign of professionalism.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE & AGGRESSIVE: COUNTER RUSSIAN NARRATIVES ON MIDDLE EAST IMPACT AND RISING OIL PRICES, EXPOSE FALSE FLAGS AND FABRICATED THIRD-PARTY STATEMENTS, AND ESPECIALLY "REGIME DESTRUCTION" RHETORIC AND WEAPONIZED CASUALTY COUNTS. Proactively counter Russian attempts to leverage the Israel-Iran conflict to diminish international support for Ukraine. Emphasize that aggression in one region (Iran) emboldens aggression in others (Ukraine), and that Ukraine's fight for sovereignty remains a cornerstone of global stability. Explicitly highlight that rising oil prices, a direct consequence of Middle East instability, financially benefit Moscow and fund its war against Ukraine, referencing Russian milblogger statements. Publicize the EU's €1 billion aid from Russian assets as a direct counter to this Russian strategy and proof of continued Western support. Crucially, immediately and forcefully debunk Russian attempts to link alleged Mossad covert operations to Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory, exposing this as a fabrication and a dangerous false flag justification, using forensic analysis of their manipulated videos (especially the new "ground-to-ground missile attack from secret base" video). Most critically, expose and debunk the fabricated "Donald Trump" social media post and any new attributed Trump statements (especially those on US support/knowledge of Israeli strikes, like "we knew about it," and new claims of Iran directly calling Trump for nuclear deals) as a sophisticated Russian disinformation tactic, highlighting its clear alignment with Russian interests. Prompt Ukrainian channels that amplified this post and other unverified Middle East videos (e.g., РБК-Україна's Tehran "strikes" video) to remove it and issue corrections. Immediately counter the "Taurus disguised as Ukrainian" narrative and "European VPK milks Ukraine" claims. Re-frame Apti Alaudinov's call for mass mobilization: highlight it as evidence of Russia's manpower crisis and high attrition, rather than a sign of strength, and underscore that Russia's aggression is depleting its own resources and personnel. Leverage captured POW testimony (Razmyslov) to support this. Strongly condemn and expose the new, highly provocative, anti-Semitic imagery amplified by Russian sources as a clear example of Russian hybrid warfare and attempts to sow hatred. This is a critical message for Western audiences. Explicitly counter Russian attempts to weaponize the 1200 body repatriation (e.g., "While all attention is focused on Iran, Kyiv received another 1200 bodies..."), framing it as a solemn humanitarian achievement and a testament to Ukrainian resilience in the face of Russian aggression. Prepare for and immediately counter any Russian exploitation of the tragic bus crash in France involving Ukrainian children, focusing on humanitarian aspects and condemning any attempts to politicize the incident. (Supports CR 1, 4, 6, 7)
  2. RAPID DEBUNKING OF MISINFORMATION. Establish a rapid response mechanism to immediately debunk unverified and sensationalized claims propagated by Russian state media and milbloggers regarding the Middle East conflict (e.g., high-value Iranian casualties like the General Staff Chief, specific missile types, false US involvement, fabricated Mossad links, Iranian "destruction" of Natanz unless independently verified, Iranian CGI threat videos, claims of radiation leaks, Iranian cancellation of nuclear talks unless independently verified). Highlight these as deliberate Russian disinformation tactics intended to distract from Ukraine. Expose Russian analysis of hypothetical US operations against Iran as a tool for fear-mongering and the use of simulated maps (like "Z комитет") as part of IO. Actively counter narratives of "Western internal instability" (e.g., Dutch protests) using verifiable facts, and counter anti-NATO narratives. (Supports CR 1, 4, 6)
  3. PROMOTE UKRAINIAN SUCCESSES: Actively publicize successful FPV drone strikes on Russian personnel, capture of POWs, GUR raids, internal security successes (MP treason/tax evasion charges - especially Novinsky's, Buchansky fraud exposure, "Forests of Ukraine" corruption, architect damaging cultural site, FSB terror plot foiled), the successful return of 11 children from occupied Kherson, and the €1 billion EU aid from Russian assets to demonstrate Ukrainian effectiveness and continued international backing. Highlight the resilience of Ukrainian communications and logistical innovation with drones and UGVs. Promote the new drone manufacturing laws and NATO mission leadership. Publicize Chinese humanitarian aid to Zaporizhzhia as a sign of broad international support. Publicize the successful repatriation of fallen Ukrainian soldiers, countering Russian mockery. Showcase ongoing training and readiness efforts (ОТУ "Харків"🇺🇦) and AD successes (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС, drone shootdowns by 77th Airmobile Brigade, MiG-29 strike). Promote adherence to IHL.
  4. MAINTAIN DOMESTIC NARRATIVE FOCUS. Continue to emphasize Ukrainian resilience and successes (e.g., successful UAV interceptions, deep cyberattacks, increase in Russian surrenders, police operations against arms trafficking, SBU action against propagandists, drone development policy, legal actions against propagandists) to maintain public morale amidst external geopolitical turbulence and internal threats. Utilize daily enemy loss reports to demonstrate progress. Reinforce national unity through remembrance events. Address utility outages transparently. Address internal security challenges, such as the Kharkiv TCC arson, transparently and explain government efforts to manage mobilization fairly and securely.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. IMMEDIATE & PROACTIVE: ENGAGE KEY PARTNERS ON SUSTAINED SUPPORT. Ukrainian diplomatic missions should immediately engage with US, EU, and other key partners to highlight the potential for the Middle East escalation to divert attention or resources, and to advocate for continued, robust military and financial support for Ukraine. Explicitly present the Russian disinformation campaign (including fabricated "Trump" statements and false flag videos, and the public calls for Russian mobilization, and the new "regime destruction" rhetoric, and the weaponization of Ukrainian casualty counts) as evidence of Moscow's intent to exploit the crisis, and highlight the financial benefit Russia gains from rising oil prices due to regional instability. Strongly advocate for the swift and expanded leveraging of frozen Russian assets, citing the recent €1 billion success. The new head of Ukraine's NATO mission should immediately prioritize this. (Supports CR 4, 6)
  2. COORDINATE WITH ALLIES ON IO STRATEGY: Seek to coordinate with allied intelligence and information agencies on a unified strategy to counter Russian disinformation regarding the Middle East, especially false flag narratives and manipulated videos/fabricated third-party statements, and the dangerous new "regime destruction" rhetoric, and the weaponization of Ukrainian casualty counts, and maintain focus on Ukraine. (Supports CR 1, 4, 6)
  3. INTERNATIONAL CONDEMNATION OF CIVILIAN TARGETING. Work with international partners to secure swift and strong condemnation of Russian attacks against civilian populations and continued KAB/KAR/FPV strikes on civilian infrastructure, emphasizing this as a breach of international law.
  4. Clarify Chinese Aid: Ensure transparent communication with international partners regarding the nature and extent of Chinese humanitarian/civilian aid, differentiating it from military support.
  5. PREPARE FOR UNSC ENGAGEMENT: If the UNSC meets today regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, Ukrainian diplomatic missions should ensure Ukraine's perspective is represented, highlighting the interconnectedness of global security challenges and the need to address Russian aggression simultaneously, and countering Russian mockery of international institutions. (Supports CR 6).
  6. ENGAGE ESTONIA ON MINE CONVENTION: Engage with Estonian counterparts to understand the motivations and implications of their withdrawal from the anti-personnel mine ban convention, and assess its potential impact on regional security and Ukraine's own military posture.
  7. COORDINATE HUMANITARIAN SUPPORT FOR FRENCH BUS CRASH. Ensure immediate and comprehensive diplomatic and consular support for Ukrainian citizens affected by the tragic bus accident in France, coordinating with French authorities for victim assistance and investigation.