Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 13 JUN 25 / 09:45 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 13 JUN 25 / 09:15 ZULU - 13 JUN 25 / 09:45 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Ukraine Operational Area:
  • Kharkiv Axis: Ukrainian Air Force reports Russian reconnaissance UAV activity in northern Kharkiv Oblast. Russian milbloggers "Дневник Десантника🇷🇺" claim to be destroying Ukrainian equipment and personnel on the Sumy, Chernihiv, and Kharkiv directions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Ukrainian report, MEDIUM for Russian claim, unverified).
  • Kupyansk Axis: No new significant reports. (CONFIDENCE: N/A - no new data).
  • Lyman Axis: New map from Colonelcassad (attributed to DIVGEN) shows light blue (friendly) control in Stavky and Zarechnoye, with a contested zone (light blue/white gradient) around northern Zarechnoye and Torskoye. Purple lines and polygons suggest lines of contact, defensive lines, or fortified positions. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - milblogger map, requires verification). This indicates ongoing, active fighting on the Lyman-Kremenna axis.
  • Siversk Axis: No new significant reports. (CONFIDENCE: N/A - no new data).
  • Kramatorsk Axis: No new significant reports. (CONFIDENCE: N/A - no new data).
  • Toretsk Axis: No new significant reports. (CONFIDENCE: N/A - no new data).
  • Pokrovsk Axis: Russian milblogger "Операция Z" / "Военкоры Русской Весны" show a map indicating Myrnograd is firmly in Ukrainian control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - based on milblogger map, consistent with previous reporting).
  • Novopavlivka Axis (CRITICAL - REINFORCED): Russian MoD (via "MoD Russia" and "Военкор Котенок") officially claims liberation of Komar and Koptevo in DNR. "Воин DV" publishes video showing aerial strikes on buildings in Komar, followed by Russian soldiers raising a flag, visually confirming the capture. Colonelcassad echoes this, adding Orekhovo on the Southern Donetsk direction near the Dnipropetrovsk border. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian MoD claim and visual confirmation by milblogger). This represents a confirmed Russian advance and consolidation of control in this key axis, aligning with the previous ISR's MDCOA regarding Dnipropetrovsk pressure.
  • Orikhiv Axis: No new significant reports on the Orikhiv sector specifically, but Colonelcassad's claim of "Orekhovo" being liberated might refer to an area near the Dnipropetrovsk border in the Southern Donetsk direction, not the Orikhiv proper. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - ambiguous place name, requires clarification).
  • Huliaipole Axis: No new significant reports. (CONFIDENCE: N/A - no new data).
  • Kherson Axis: Ukrainian SSO (via "Николаевский Ванёк" and "БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС") claim to have destroyed a Russian "decision-making center" on the Kherson direction using an FPV drone, showing a strike on a building with a Russian flag. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Ukrainian combat unit claim with visual BDA).
  • Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Synelnykove district): Ukrainian Air Force warns of threat of Russian aviation weapons in Synelnykove district. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Ukrainian official report). This confirms ongoing Russian air activity in the area and pressure against the previously reported ground incursion.
  • Zaporizhzhia Oblast: Ukrainian Air Force reports enemy reconnaissance UAVs in Zaporizhzhia Oblast, with means engaged to shoot them down. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Ukrainian official report).
  • Sumy Oblast (CRITICAL - REINFORCED): Russian MoD (via "MoD Russia" and "Военкор Котенок") officially claims liberation of Yablonovka in Sumy Oblast. Colonelcassad echoes this claim. Russian milbloggers "Дневник Десантника🇷🇺" claim to be destroying Ukrainian equipment and personnel on the Sumy, Chernihiv, and Kharkiv directions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian MoD claim, requires independent verification of control). This confirms sustained and claimed successful Russian ground pressure on the Sumy axis, aligning with the previous ISR's MDCOA regarding creating a buffer zone.
• Russian Territory:
  • Moscow Oblast ("Resonit" factory): No new reports. (CONFIDENCE: N/A - no new data).
  • Tambov Oblast (Kotovsk Powder Plant): ASTRA reports a "religious procession for protection from enemies" in Kotovsk, Tambov Oblast, after drone strikes on the local powder plant. This is a direct acknowledgement of previous Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian milblogger acknowledging strike implicitly).
• International (Israel-Iran) (CRITICAL, RAPIDLY ESCALATING, AND HYPER-AMPLIFIED): The conflict continues with aggressive IO from all sides.
  • Iranian Claims/Reporting:
    • MEHR NEWS (Iranian agency, via Russian milbloggers) reports a "powerful explosion" in Tabriz (East Azerbaijan province). Multiple videos (Alex Parker Returns, STERNENKO, Военкор Котенок, Басурин о главном, Оперативний ЗСУ) show massive plumes of black smoke from an industrial/airport area in Tabriz. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - multiple sources with visual BDA of large-scale destruction). Alex Parker Returns claims the airport in Tabriz continues to be attacked. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - unverified targeting).
    • Iran Red Crescent claims at least 95 people wounded in 12 Iranian provinces due to Israeli strikes, with 1 rescuer killed. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Iranian official claim, unverified by independent sources). This marks the first reported civilian casualties.
  • Israeli Statements/Actions: DeepStateUA (Ukrainian source) reports "IDF launched a massive strike on Iran's air defense system in the west of the country." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Ukrainian reporting Israeli claim). Israeli Defense Minister was reportedly informed that "most of the senior leadership of the Iranian Air Force was liquidated during a meeting in an underground headquarters" (Ynet, reported by TASS). (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Israeli media claim, unverified by independent sources). This aligns with previous claims of high-value casualties.
  • Russian Narratives (CRITICAL - HYPER-AMPLIFICATION AND FABRICATION - REINFORCED):
    • Official Condemnation & Blame: Russian MFA (TASS, Басурин о главном) "decisively condemns Israel's forceful action against Iran in violation of the UN Charter." They state "unprovoked strikes on a sovereign state, its citizens, peaceful cities, nuclear energy infrastructure are unacceptable" and claim "responsibility for all consequences of Israel's provocation will lie with the Israeli leadership." They also state "IAEA staff were under Israeli fire." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian official statements). This is a strategic move to position Russia as a defender of international law while continuing to destabilize the region.
    • False Flag Justification (HYPER-ACCELERATED & VISUALLY REINFORCED): STERNENKO and ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS (Ukrainian channels, likely re-amplifying Russian sources) publish videos claiming "Mossad agents in Iran are deploying high-precision weapons to destroy Iranian air defense" and "Mossad agents deploying high-precision weapons in Iran before 'Rising Lion' operation." The accompanying pixelated thermal imagery and targeting video (even if unverified) are explicitly designed to visually reinforce the false narrative of covert ground operations and to justify similar Russian actions elsewhere. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian/Ukrainian reporting of claim, LOW for verification of Mossad operation). This is a direct and highly dangerous attempt to establish a new pretext for deep strikes and sabotage, potentially attributing them to Ukraine.
    • Fabricated Leadership Casualties: Colonelcassad and Alex Parker Returns claim "New IRGC Commander General Ahmad Vahidi" has been appointed after the death of Salami (referring to the IRGC Chief Salami, previously claimed killed). Alex Parker Returns adds "He will take revenge." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for Russian milblogger claim, LOW for verification of Salami's death and Vahidi's new appointment). This pushes the narrative of high-value Iranian casualties and a more aggressive Iranian response.
    • Dramatic Escalation Narrative: Басурин о главном's caption: "ISRAEL DELIVERS A DEVASTATING BLOW TO IRAN, AND THE WORLD HOLDS ITS BREATH." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Russia Benefits Narrative: Russia's MFA statement that there is "no military-force solution" to the Iranian nuclear program issues, while actively selling the narrative of Israeli "provocation," suggests a strategic interest in preventing Western intervention while benefiting from the chaos.
    • Civilian Evacuation: TASS reports "51 artists of the Bolshoi Symphony Orchestra are in Iran, evacuation possibility is being worked out." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). This adds to the narrative of immediate danger and crisis.
  • Geomagnetic Storm: No new reports on specific impacts, but the phenomenon is ongoing.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• The unexpected geomagnetic storm has begun on Earth. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). No new specific impacts reported, but effects on communications, GPS, and AD systems are ongoing.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces: Maintain defensive posture across multiple axes. Actively engage Russian reconnaissance UAVs (Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv). Ukrainian SSO claim successful FPV drone strike on Russian C2 in Kherson. Received €1 billion from EU from Russian assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces: Claiming official "liberation" of Komar, Koptevo (DNR), and Yablonovka (Sumy). Actively conducting ground operations in Sumy and Novopavlivka directions. Utilizing aviation weapons in Dnipropetrovsk. Employing reconnaissance UAVs. Russian MoD issued formal statement condemning Israel's actions in Iran. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Israeli Forces: Reportedly conducting massive strikes on Iranian AD systems. Claiming liquidation of high-level Iranian Air Force leadership. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - based on reporting).
• Iranian Forces: Confirming major explosions/fires in Tabriz. Reporting civilian casualties. Allegedly appointing new IRGC Commander (unconfirmed). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for explosions, MEDIUM for casualties/appointments).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS (RUSSIA FOCUSED)

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities (Russia):
  • Sustained Ground Offensive Operations (REINFORCED): Confirmed capture of Komar and Koptevo (DNR) and claimed liberation of Yablonovka (Sumy) demonstrate persistent, successful, albeit attritional, ground offensive capabilities. The video evidence from Komar shows coordinated aerial and ground assault. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Warfare (CRITICAL - HYPER-ACCELERATED & VISUALLY REINFORCED): Russia's information operations have reached a new, dangerous level of sophistication and fabrication, leveraging the Israel-Iran conflict. Key capabilities:
    • Official Condemnation & Blame Shifting: Rapidly issuing official MFA statements condemning Israel, blaming the US, and claiming civilian/IAEA staff casualties to seize diplomatic initiative and undermine Western credibility. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Visual False Flag Justification (CRITICAL): The re-amplification of fabricated Mossad ground operations in Iran, now accompanied by specific, manipulated video footage (thermal imaging, pixelated figures, targeting overlays), is a direct and highly sophisticated attempt to create a visual template for false flag operations. This allows Russia to implicitly link deep strikes inside Ukraine or against Western interests to "Mossad-style" tactics, thereby justifying future Russian actions or discrediting Ukrainian asymmetric warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - for the capability to fabricate and disseminate this narrative with visual support).
    • Rapid Fabrication of High-Value Casualties & Successor Narratives: Swiftly propagating unverified claims of high-level Iranian military leadership liquidation and immediate "replacement" (e.g., Salami's alleged death and Vahidi's "appointment") to control the narrative of Iranian response and severity of impact. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Hyper-Sensationalism: Using dramatic language ("devastating blow," "world holds its breath") to amplify perceived chaos and maintain global attention on the Middle East. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Aerial Attack Capabilities: Continued use of aviation weapons (KABs/missiles) in Dnipropetrovsk and reconnaissance UAVs in Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Internal Control & Resource Mobilization: The Tambov religious procession "for protection from enemies" implicitly acknowledges the impact of Ukrainian drone strikes on critical Russian military-industrial facilities, demonstrating a capability to organize public displays to mitigate domestic morale impacts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions (Russia):
  • Maximize Global Distraction (PRIMARY, HYPER-ACCELERATED & NEW DANGER - REINFORCED): Russia's primary intent is to exploit the Israel-Iran conflict as a cover for escalating its own operations in Ukraine. This involves:
    • Creating a Pretext for Deep Strikes/Sabotage (CRITICAL NEW INTENT): The most significant development is the clear intent to establish a false flag narrative of "covert ground operations" (e.g., Mossad in Iran) that can be later attributed to Ukraine or used to justify future Russian deep strikes/sabotage operations in Ukraine or Western countries. This is a direct attempt to normalize and legitimize their own escalating hybrid warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Diverting Western Resources & Attention: The sustained focus on Middle East escalation aims to shift international focus, political capital, and military resources away from Ukraine, thereby reducing aid and pressure on Russia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Benefiting Economically: Russia's celebration of rising oil prices due to regional instability remains a key financial driver. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Degrade Ukrainian AD & Infrastructure / Achieve Tactical Gains (REINFORCED): The capture of Komar and Koptevo, and claimed Yablonovka, confirms Russia's intent to continue attritional ground assaults to secure localized gains and expand buffer zones, particularly in DNR and Sumy. The ongoing aviation threats in Dnipropetrovsk aim to fix Ukrainian AD and infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Fix Ukrainian Reserves & Open New Axes (REINFORCED): The confirmed advances in Sumy (Yablonovka) and Dnipropetrovsk (Komar/Koptevo near the border) demonstrate a clear intent to open new directions, force Ukraine to disperse reserves, and create broader operational challenges. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Undermine International Support for Ukraine: Russia's official condemnation of Israel (while unofficial channels celebrate chaos) aims to position Russia as a "responsible" actor on the global stage, contrasting with its portrayal of the West as destabilizing. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Courses of Action (COA) (Russia):
  • COA 1 (Hyper-Intensified & Expanded IO on Middle East & "Global Conflict" - PRIMARY, HYPER-ACCELERATED & NEW DANGER): Russia will immediately and relentlessly escalate its information operations regarding the Israel-Iran conflict. This includes continuously pushing unsubstantiated high-value Iranian casualty claims (e.g., IRGC Salami's death, Air Force leadership), fabricating or dramatically exaggerating details of Iranian retaliation, and explicitly celebrating the diversion of Western resources and the rise of oil prices. They will use new claims of Mossad operations (e.g., via Azerbaijan) to tie the conflict to "Ukrainian tactics." The most critical new element is the continued creation and visual dissemination of fabricated narratives of covert ground operations (e.g., Mossad in Iran) to justify future Russian deep strikes, sabotage, or false-flag operations, potentially attributing them to Ukraine. Expect continued official condemnation of Israel/US to position Russia as "responsible." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 2 (Sustained Attritional Ground Operations & Opportunistic Probes on Multiple Axes - REINFORCED): Russia will maintain high-intensity, attritional assaults on key axes (Pokrovsk, Toretsk, Lyman). The confirmed advances on the Novopavlivka direction (Komar, Koptevo) and Sumy Oblast (Yablonovka claims) are strong indicators of continued, potentially intensified, pushes in these directions. Opportunistic probes into other border regions (Chernihiv, Dnipropetrovsk) will continue, supported by intensified reconnaissance and KAB strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • COA 3 (Sustained Targeted Aerial Attacks - UAVs, KABs, Ballistic Missiles - REINFORCED): Russia will continue to employ a mix of UAVs (Shaheds), guided aerial bombs (KABs), and ballistic missiles against Ukrainian targets, aiming to deplete AD and inflict damage. Expect opportunistic missile strikes against rear targets if Ukrainian AD is perceived to be distracted by frontline pressure or resource strain, especially with the distraction of the Middle East and ongoing geomagnetic storm effects. The aviation threat in Dnipropetrovsk confirms this. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • COA 4 (Exploitation of Internal Ukrainian Issues and Internal Crackdown - Reinforced): Russia will likely attempt to exploit internal Ukrainian security issues, political discourse, and social challenges to sow discord and undermine confidence in the Ukrainian armed forces and government. They will amplify claims of Ukrainian shelling causing civilian casualties in occupied areas and continue to recruit Ukrainian youth for sabotage. Concurrently, Russia will maintain its internal crackdown on dissent, as seen with the Tambov religious procession which serves to re-legitimize the conflict domestically. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Confirmed Ground Gains on New/Emphasized Axes: The official claim and visual confirmation of Komar and Koptevo liberation (Novopavlivka direction) and Yablonovka (Sumy) indicates a successful adaptation of Russian tactics to achieve localized gains on these critical axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Visual Reinforcement of False Flag Narratives (CRITICAL): The use of manipulated thermal imaging and targeting videos to "prove" Mossad ground operations in Iran is a new and dangerous adaptation in Russia's information warfare, designed to visually legitimize future false flag operations or attribute them to Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Immediate Official Response to International Events: The rapid and formal condemnation of Israel's actions by the Russian MFA (TASS) demonstrates a highly agile diplomatic and IO apparatus, capable of seizing a narrative and framing it to Russia's advantage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Religious Mobilization against External Threats: The "religious procession" in Tambov in response to drone strikes is an adaptation to boost morale and potentially reframe the conflict as a spiritual struggle against external threats, rather than a military defeat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The high volume and complexity of Russian information operations on the Israel-Iran conflict, including rapid production of new narratives and visual fabrications, suggest a robust and well-resourced IO apparatus. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The continued ability to conduct simultaneous ground offensives on multiple axes (Donetsk, Novopavlivka, Sumy) and sustained aerial attacks (Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv) indicates maintained, albeit attritional, logistical and combat sustainment capacity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• The Tambov religious procession implies that local Russian authorities are being tasked with addressing morale and perceived "threats" from Ukrainian deep strikes, possibly indicating a strain on conventional security measures or a shift in resource allocation to "soft power" responses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian IO C2 (HYPER-EFFECTIVE): The almost instantaneous, coordinated, and multi-platform dissemination of highly speculative and inflammatory claims regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, including the rapid production and dissemination of visually-manipulated content to support false flag narratives, highlights an exceptionally effective, highly centralized, and adaptable C2 for real-time information warfare. They are leveraging both official (TASS, MoD) and unofficial (milblogger) channels simultaneously, including the use of simulated maps and videos to visually reinforce narratives. The immediate amplification of the Iranian FM's statement blaming the US and the swift condemnation of Israel shows rapid integration of new narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Military C2: The confirmed capture of Komar, Koptevo, and claimed Yablonovka, coupled with ongoing aerial threats in Dnipropetrovsk and reconnaissance activity in other regions, suggests coordinated operational C2 between ground and air forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Impact of Geomagnetic Storm: The unexpected geomagnetic storm continues to pose C2 challenges for both sides, particularly affecting long-range communications and GNSS-reliant systems. Russian and Ukrainian forces will need to adapt their C2 practices to mitigate these effects. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES (UKRAINIAN FOCUSED)

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• High Alert on Multiple Fronts (REINFORCED): Ukrainian forces are actively engaged in repelling Russian assaults and conducting defensive operations on a wide range of axes. The commitment of resources to address Russian reconnaissance UAVs (Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv) and aviation threats (Dnipropetrovsk) indicates a responsive posture. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Effective Deep Battle and Asymmetric Capabilities: The successful SSO FPV drone strike on a Russian "decision-making center" in Kherson demonstrates continued proficiency in deep battle and asymmetric warfare. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Financial Resilience: The receipt of €1 billion from the EU, derived from Russian assets, provides crucial financial support for Ukraine's war effort, demonstrating continued international backing and the viability of leveraging frozen Russian assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Veteran Support Initiatives: The Zaporizhzhia OVA's video on free boxing training for veterans highlights initiatives aimed at supporting military personnel and maintaining social cohesion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Success (Deep Battle): Ukrainian SSO FPV drone strike on a Russian "decision-making center" in Kherson is a significant tactical success, targeting a high-value C2 asset. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Success (Cyber Warfare/Strategic Finance): The receipt of €1 billion from Russian assets indicates successful diplomatic and legal efforts to leverage frozen Russian funds, a significant strategic success for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Success (Counter-Reconnaissance): Engagement of Russian reconnaissance UAVs in Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv demonstrates effective counter-reconnaissance capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Success (Infrastructure Protection): Ukraine's receipt of €1 billion from Russian assets indicates success in diplomatic and legal efforts to leverage frozen Russian funds, providing essential resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Territorial Loss/Pressure): The confirmed capture of Komar and Koptevo (DNR) and the claimed liberation of Yablonovka (Sumy) represent tactical setbacks, indicating successful, albeit costly, Russian advances on critical axes, requiring Ukrainian forces to defend or counter-attack. The ongoing aviation threat in Dnipropetrovsk adds pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Information Environment - CRITICAL ACCELERATION): The hyper-intensified and fabricated Russian IO campaign on the Middle East, particularly the visually reinforced false flag narratives linking Mossad operations to Ukraine, represents an accelerating and highly dangerous information setback. This directly threatens the perceived legitimacy of Ukrainian deep strikes and aims to justify future Russian actions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setback (Psychological Warfare): The religious procession in Tambov is a Russian attempt to psychologically counter the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory, suggesting Ukraine's efforts are having an effect but need to be continually framed to counter this type of Russian response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Capabilities: Ukraine's AD requirements for ballistic missiles, KABs, and reconnaissance UAVs remain paramount, especially with Russia potentially capitalizing on a global distraction and any effects from the geomagnetic storm. The aviation threat in Dnipropetrovsk reinforces this.
• ISR & Counter-ISR: The heightened Russian reconnaissance activity (Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv) necessitates continued investment in and deployment of ISR assets, particularly counter-UAV systems.
• Deep Strike Capabilities: The successful SSO strike on a Russian C2 node highlights the continued need for FPV drones, long-range precision munitions, and associated intelligence for effective deep battle.
• International Support Focus (CRITICAL, HYPER-ACCELERATED RISK): The intensifying Middle East crisis, amplified by Russian IO and now explicitly linking US/Mossad actions to Ukraine, poses an immediate and significant risk to the continued flow of international military and financial aid to Ukraine. The ability to leverage frozen Russian assets for aid (like the €1 billion received) is a positive development but needs to be sustained and expanded. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Cybersecurity Resources: The continued sophistication of Russian IO, including visual fabrication, demands continuous investment in Ukrainian defensive and offensive cyber capabilities, and expert analysts to rapidly identify and debunk such disinformation.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT (COGNITIVE DOMAIN)

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (CRITICAL - EXTREMELY ACTIVE, AGGRESSIVE, AND FABRICATED - HYPER-ACCELERATED):
  • Middle East Escalation Amplification & Fabrication (Primary, Hyper-Aggressive, Visually Reinforced): Russian state media (TASS, MFA statements condemning Israel) and milbloggers (Alex Parker Returns, Colonelcassad, STERNENKO, Военкор Котенок, Басурин о главном, Оперативний ЗСУ) are massively, sensationally, and visually amplifying the Israel-Iran conflict. They are:
    • Fabricating High-Value Iranian Casualties (REINFORCED): Claims of "most of the senior leadership of the Iranian Air Force was liquidated" and "new IRGC Commander General Ahmad Vahidi after the death of Salami" are pushed to suggest devastating Iranian losses and a more aggressive response, driving the narrative of escalation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Exaggerating Retaliation & Threat: Claims of "powerful explosion" and "detonation" at Tabriz airport, with multiple videos showing massive smoke plumes, even if true, are used to dramatize the conflict and highlight Iran's vulnerability/Israeli effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Propagating Global Conflict Narrative: "ISRAEL DELIVERS A DEVASTATING BLOW TO IRAN, AND THE WORLD HOLDS ITS BREATH" emphasizes the perceived global impact and tension. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Directly Blaming US/West (REINFORCED): Official MFA statements explicitly "condemn Israel's forceful action... in violation of the UN Charter" and claim "responsibility for all consequences... will lie with the Israeli leadership." Claims of "IAEA staff under Israeli fire" further push this narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • False Flag Justification with Visuals (CRITICAL NEW DEVELOPMENT): STERNENKO and ЦАПЛІЄНКО_UKRAINE FIGHTS (Ukrainian channels, likely re-amplifying Russian sources) are publishing manipulated videos (thermal imaging, pixelated figures, targeting overlays) to visually "prove" Mossad ground operations inside Iran. The explicit claim that "Mossad agents in Iran are deploying high-precision weapons to destroy Iranian air defense" and the implied comparison to Ukrainian deep strikes (from previous ISR) is a highly dangerous attempt to justify future Russian false flag operations or deep strikes, potentially attributing them to Ukraine or using them as a pretext. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Fueling Civilian Casualties Narrative: Red Crescent claims of 95 wounded, 1 killed in 12 provinces. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for veracity, HIGH for Russian amplification intent).
  • Russian Military Strength & Control (REINFORCED): Official MoD claims of "liberating" Komar, Koptevo, and Yablonovka, supported by video evidence from Komar, are designed to project continued military success and control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Claims of destroying Ukrainian equipment/personnel on Sumy/Chernihiv/Kharkiv directions. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Internal Russian Resilience: The "religious procession" in Tambov is a specific propaganda tactic to counter the psychological impact of Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian territory, portraying spiritual defiance against "enemies." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narrative: Ukrainian sources (Air Force, SSO, DeepStateUA, Zaporizhzhia OVA, Nikolaevskiy Vanyok, Butusov Plus, CyberBoroshno, RBK-Ukraine) are providing daily operational updates:
  • Highlighting Russian UAV reconnaissance and aviation threats (Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk).
  • Reporting successful Ukrainian strikes (SSO on Kherson C2).
  • Acknowledging the EU's €1 billion aid from Russian assets as a positive development.
  • Reporting on social initiatives (veteran boxing training).
  • DeepStateUA also reports on Israeli strikes, amplifying the global conflict (albeit less sensationalized than Russian sources).
  • Critically, "КіберБорошно | CyberBoroshno" reports a significant successful strike on a Russian "Yastreb-AV" radar in Donetsk Oblast, a key counter-battery asset. This should be a major element of Ukrainian counter-IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Confirmed Russian gains in Komar/Koptevo and claimed Yablonovka will be a morale challenge. However, the successful SSO strike in Kherson and the significant financial support from the EU (€1 billion from Russian assets) will provide a morale boost. The reported destruction of the Russian "Yastreb-AV" radar is a major positive. The relentless and fabricated Russian IO on the Middle East, particularly the new false flag narratives, will place continuous strain on morale by attempting to erode international focus and support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: The official claims of territorial gains (Komar, Koptevo, Yablonovka) and visual confirmation of Komar's capture will significantly boost Russian domestic morale. The hyper-sensationalized narrative of the Middle East conflict, portraying it as a global crisis that benefits Russia and exposes Western weakness, is designed to galvanize public support for the war in Ukraine. The religious procession in Tambov is a direct attempt to bolster morale in a region affected by Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). However, the internal issues highlighted in previous ISR (Wagner family protests, recruitment corruption) remain underlying concerns.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Middle East Escalation (CRITICAL & ACCELERATING): The Israel-Iran conflict continues to escalate with confirmed large-scale explosions/fires in Tabriz, claims of Israeli strikes on Iranian AD and high-level Air Force leadership, and Iranian claims of civilian casualties. Russia's immediate official condemnation of Israel and the US, while simultaneously amplifying sensationalized narratives (including false flags), is a calculated diplomatic maneuver designed to portray Russia as a "responsible" actor while reaping geopolitical benefits. Rosaviatsia's flight ban continues to underscore Moscow's assessment of regional danger. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Global Attention Diversion (CRITICAL, HYPER-ACCELERATED): The primary and most immediate threat to Ukraine remains the successful, rapid, and aggressive diversion of global attention by Russia to the Middle East crisis. Russia's explicit statements about this diversion benefiting them (financially, militarily) confirm this as a deliberate, opportunistic strategy. The new narratives explicitly linking Mossad's alleged internal operations to Ukrainian deep strikes create a complex and dangerous layer of disinformation that seeks to undermine international support, discredit Ukrainian actions, and justify future Russian false flag operations. This directly imperils sustained political, military, and financial aid for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• EU Financial Support (POSITIVE): Ukraine receiving €1 billion from the EU, generated from Russian assets, is a highly positive development. It demonstrates continued Western commitment and a successful mechanism for funding Ukraine, despite Russian attempts at global distraction. This is a crucial counter-narrative to Russian claims of dwindling Western support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Diplomatic Disengagement: Russia's official statements regarding "unprovoked strikes" on "nuclear energy infrastructure" and the evacuation of Russian artists further emphasize their perceived severity of the situation and the potential for a wider conflict.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS (FUTURE OPERATIONS)

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Hyper-Intensified & Sustained Russian IO on Middle East & "Global Conflict" Narrative (HYPER-ACCELERATED & NEW DANGER - REINFORCED): Russia will continue its current aggressive, fabricated, and celebratory information campaign regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, doubling down on claims of Iranian high-value casualties (e.g., IRGC Salami's death, Air Force leadership, as reported by TASS and milbloggers), exaggerating Iranian retaliation, and openly stating the conflict's benefits to Russia (financial gain, US resource diversion). The most significant element is the continuation and expansion of visually-backed, fabricated false flag narratives (e.g., Mossad ground operations in Iran via manipulated videos) to justify future Russian deep strikes, sabotage, or false-flag operations against Ukraine or Western interests. They will also react aggressively to any new Western aid to Ukraine by attempting to undermine it through propaganda. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Sustained Attritional Ground Operations & Intensified Pressure on Sumy & Novopavlivka Axes (REINFORCED): Russia will leverage its confirmed captures of Komar and Koptevo and claimed capture of Yablonovka to intensify ground pressure on these axes. This will likely involve continued local assaults, consolidation of gains, and preparation for deeper pushes. Attritional assaults on Pokrovsk and Toretsk will continue. Opportunistic probes into other border regions will persist, supported by intensified reconnaissance and KAB strikes (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk aviation threat). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Persistent Massed Aerial Attacks on Ukraine (UAVs, KABs, Ballistic Missiles) (REINFORCED): Russia will continue its mixed aerial attacks on Ukrainian cities and infrastructure using Shaheds, KABs, and ballistic missiles, potentially attempting to capitalize on any perceived Western distraction or resource strain, especially given the geomagnetic storm which could affect AD systems. Targeted attacks on military and critical infrastructure will persist, with a high likelihood of civilian casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Increased Exploitation of Internal Ukrainian Issues and Internal Crackdown (Reinforced): Russia will seek to exploit any internal Ukrainian legal issues, political discourse, or social challenges to sow discord and undermine trust in Ukrainian leadership, as seen with efforts to recruit youth for sabotage. They will amplify claims of civilian casualties in occupied areas. Internally, Russia will continue to suppress dissent and use social/religious events (like the Tambov procession) to boost morale and distract from domestic issues. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Coordinated Strategic Escalation under Global Cover (CRITICAL - HIGHLY ELEVATED & REINFORCED): Russia perceives the current Middle East crisis as a golden opportunity for a significant strategic offensive or a major hybrid escalation in Ukraine, betting on overwhelming global distraction. This could manifest as:
  • Major Ground Offensive with Strategic Intent: A large-scale ground offensive on a new axis (e.g., deeper into Sumy Oblast, a renewed Kharkiv offensive, or a deeper push from the Novopavlivka direction towards Dnipropetrovsk), potentially synchronized with:
  • Massed Long-Range Precision Strikes (CRITICAL): Coordinated, massed strikes (Kalibrs, Kh-series missiles, potentially Iranian-supplied ballistic missiles) against critical Ukrainian logistics nodes, Western aid entry points, energy infrastructure, or strategic C2 facilities, potentially exploiting geomagnetic storm effects on navigation or any perceived AD vulnerabilities. The claimed liquidation of Iranian Air Force leadership may be a false flag to prepare for a similar claim about a Ukrainian AD/Air Force leadership.
  • Synchronized Sabotage/Cyber (CRITICAL): Coordinated and widespread sabotage attacks against critical transport (railway, as GUR claims to have hit) and energy infrastructure in the deep rear, alongside major cyberattacks aiming to cripple supply lines and C2 before a coordinated Western response can materialize. The explicit visual false flag narratives regarding "Mossad ground operations" provide a dangerous new pretext for such actions, possibly to be attributed to "Ukrainian saboteurs" or "Western special services." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Probability and impact are very high).
• Exploitation of Geopolitical Chaos to Pressure NATO/EU (New MDCOA - Reinforced): Russia may use the increased global instability stemming from the Israel-Iran conflict to overtly or covertly pressure NATO/EU members, particularly those reliant on Russian energy, to reduce support for Ukraine or withdraw from sanctions, presenting itself as a necessary stabilizing force or by threatening to escalate conflicts further. This includes leveraging statements from NATO officials for their narrative and exacerbating internal divisions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Based on long-term Russian strategy and current IO).
• Increased Targeting of Civilian Logistics/Personnel with Drones (Elevated): Russia adapts its FPV drone tactics to explicitly target civilian logistics routes, humanitarian aid operations, or demining teams, potentially under false flag narratives (e.g., "HIMARS disguised as containers" or attributing them to "Mossad-style" operations). This could further exacerbate humanitarian crises and disrupt civilian support infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Observed FPV targeting of civilian vehicles and previous reports).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • ISR: CRITICAL: Continue uninterrupted, high-priority monitoring of Russian IO channels for new sensationalized claims regarding the Middle East (especially related to new explosions, alleged high-value Iranian casualties, or escalated Iranian retaliation, or specific missile types), particularly focusing on any claims related to nuclear facilities and contrasting with IAEA statements. Prioritize verification of claimed Iranian casualties and target damage (especially in Tabriz). Continue monitoring UAV activity in Crimea, Sumy, Chernihiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, and other border oblasts. Monitor for further Iranian drone/missile launches towards Israel and their interception by Israel/Jordan. Monitor the full impact of the geomagnetic storm on communications, navigation, and AD systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • IO: Commanders and IO elements must prepare for an immediate, aggressive, and evidence-based counter-narrative against Russian disinformation regarding the Middle East crisis, particularly emphasizing that Russia is exploiting the crisis and that rising oil prices directly benefit Moscow. Prepare to debunk specific Russian claims regarding Israeli/Iranian military actions and expose their economic and geopolitical motivations. Specifically prepare to forcefully counter false flag narratives linking Mossad operations to Ukraine, using the "Yastreb-AV" destruction and SSO strikes as examples of legitimate Ukrainian defense. Publicize successes like the €1 billion EU aid.
• Short Term (Next 6-12 hours):
  • IO: Ukrainian forces must actively debunk sensationalized/unverified claims from Russian sources regarding the Middle East, and reinforce the message that global aggression requires a unified front against all aggressors. Proactively counter narratives of "Ukrainian terrorism" and "internal opposition" railway sabotage. Highlight forced Russification efforts in occupied territories. Actively promote the EU's €1 billion aid as a direct hit on Russia's war funding and a sign of continued international pressure. Debunk Russian narratives of "Western instability." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Military Readiness: Commanders must ensure all air defense units are at highest readiness in targeted oblasts (Kharkiv, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Sumy, Chernihiv, Kyiv), anticipating potential opportunistic strikes including ballistic missile, KAB threats, and reconnaissance UAVs. Increase physical security measures for critical railway infrastructure and cultural sites. Re-evaluate force posture on Dnipropetrovsk (Novopavlivka direction) and Sumy (Yablonovka/Yunakovka) axes for any opportunistic escalation, and maintain vigilance against probes despite local "controlled" status. Review force posture on Sumy/Chernihiv axes in light of persistent border attacks and new MDCOA. Anticipate potential effects of geomagnetic storm on AD and C2 and implement contingency plans.
  • Diplomatic/Inter-Agency: Actively engage with international partners to secure immediate, public condemnation of Russian exploitation of the Middle East crisis and to reaffirm commitment to Ukraine.
• Mid Term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • Diplomatic: Ukrainian diplomats must proactively engage with international partners to ensure sustained focus and aid despite global geopolitical developments, explicitly highlighting the Russian manipulation of the Middle East crisis and its economic benefits from rising oil prices. Advocate for continued leveraging of Russian frozen assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • AD/Counter-Battery: Re-evaluate and reinforce AD and counter-battery postures in light of persistent and targeted aerial threats, including ballistic missile strikes, KABs, and new Russian drone types. Prioritize acquisition of more ballistic missile interceptors and countermeasures against new Russian drone variants. Continue effective counter-battery fire against assets like "Yastreb-AV" radar.
  • Force Protection/Counter-Sabotage: Immediately review and enhance security protocols for critical infrastructure, particularly railway networks and utility grids, and intensify counter-intelligence operations against potential sabotage cells. Increase protection measures for civilian logistics and humanitarian operations against FPV drone threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Personnel Management: Continue to monitor enemy loss rates and plan for sustained personnel rotation and training needs. Promote veteran support programs.

---

6. INTELLIGENCE GAPS & COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS

• GAP 1: VERIFICATION OF IRANIAN NUCLEAR FACILITY DAMAGE & HIGH-VALUE CASUALTIES (CRITICAL & HYPER-PRIORITY): The primary and most critical intelligence gap is the lack of independent, confirmed verification of claimed Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities (e.g., Natanz) and the extent of damage to other strategic Iranian military/industrial facilities. The claims of high-value Iranian casualties (General Staff Chief Baqeri, IRGC Chief Salami, Air Defense Commander, "high-ranking official" in a bedroom, and now President Raisi linked to Mossad) and their alleged "replacements" (Vahidi) remain unverified and are being actively fabricated/amplified by Russia. The civilian casualty count by Red Crescent also requires independent verification.
  • COLLECTION REQUIREMENT (CR): Prioritize SIGINT, GEOINT, and HUMINT from credible, independent third-party sources to verify or refute Russian/Iranian claims of casualties and Battle Damage Assessment (BDA) on alleged Iranian military/industrial facilities, especially nuclear sites. Engage with allied intelligence partners for rapid information sharing. Analyze newly emerged videos and images for precise location identification and damage assessment. Monitor Iranian military communications and public statements for further details on drone/missile operations and retaliation. (PRIORITY: EXTREME)
• GAP 2: SCALE AND OBJECTIVE OF RUSSIAN GROUND ADVANCES IN SUMY OBLAST (Yablonovka/Yunakovka) AND NOVOPAVLIVKA DIRECTION (Komar/Koptevo) (CRITICAL - REINFORCED): The official claim and visual confirmation of Komar and Koptevo, and the official claim for Yablonovka in Sumy, require immediate, independent verification of the extent of control and Russian force composition. The precise scale, units involved, and immediate objectives of Russian ground operations in these areas remain critical intelligence gaps. Distinguishing between limited incursions/shaping operations and a major offensive is key.
  • CR: Intensify IMINT, SIGINT, and HUMINT collection on Russian force dispositions, logistics build-up, and command movements on the Sumy and Novopavlivka/Dnipropetrovsk axes. Focus on unit identification and their actual operational roles, and distinguish between attritional/fixing operations and genuine preparations for a major breakthrough. Verify commitment of Ukrainian reserves. (PRIORITY: EXTREME)
• GAP 3: OPERATIONAL IMPACT OF GEOMAGNETIC STORM (CRITICAL): The unexpected geomagnetic storm could significantly impact C2, navigation, and AD systems. The extent of this impact on both Russian and Ukrainian forces is a critical intelligence gap.
  • CR: Monitor Russian and Ukrainian military communications for mentions of interference or changes in electronic warfare/UAV/precision strike operations. Assess any observable degradation in GNSS-reliant systems or increased reliance on alternative navigation. (PRIORITY: EXTREME)
• GAP 4: VERIFICATION OF "YASTREB-AV" RADAR DESTRUCTION (CRITICAL): The claim by CyberBoroshno regarding the critical damage to a Russian "Yastreb-AV" radar in Donetsk requires independent verification due to its high strategic value as a counter-battery asset.
  • CR: Prioritize IMINT and SIGINT to confirm the destruction or critical damage of the "Yastreb-AV" radar system and assess its operational impact on Russian artillery effectiveness. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).
• GAP 5: OPERATIONAL IMPACT OF RUSSIAN IO ON WESTERN SUPPORT FOR UKRAINE (CRITICAL - HYPER-ACCELERATED & REINFORCED): The effectiveness of Russian IO in diverting Western attention and potentially impacting aid decisions is a critical unknown, especially with rising oil prices, Iranian accusations of US coordination, and now the explicit linkage of US/Mossad actions to Ukraine, and the focus on internal Western instability. The proposed EU oil price cap needs to be monitored for its implementation and impact on Russian behavior.
  • CR: Conduct continuous OSINT monitoring of Western media narratives, social media trends, and parliamentary/congressional discussions to assess the influence of the Middle East crisis and Russian disinformation on public and political support for Ukraine. Analyze the impact of rising oil prices and the proposed EU oil price cap on Western political will and Russian revenue. (PRIORITY: HIGH)
• GAP 6: AUTHENTICITY AND ORIGIN OF "MOSSAD GROUND OPERATION" VIDEOS (CRITICAL NEW GAP): The highly manipulated videos (thermal, pixelated figures, targeting overlays) purporting to show Mossad ground operations in Iran are a new and dangerous disinformation tactic. Their precise origin, the level of manipulation, and the network of their initial dissemination need to be thoroughly investigated to expose the false flag intent.
  • CR: Conduct forensic digital analysis of the videos to determine their origin, editing history, and any digital watermarks or identifiers. Map the network of initial dissemination. Engage with allied intelligence partners for technical support in this analysis. (PRIORITY: EXTREME).

7. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: IMMEDIATE VERIFICATION & AGGRESSIVE COUNTERING OF MIDDLE EAST DISINFORMATION AND FALSE FLAGS. All-source intelligence must rapidly verify all claims and counter-claims regarding the Israel-Iran conflict, particularly Russian narratives aiming to implicate US leadership, exaggerate the crisis/casualties (especially regarding new explosions, alleged high-value Iranian casualties including Air Defense Commander, and the extent of Iranian drone/missile attacks). Leverage IAEA statements for nuclear sites. Specifically identify and highlight Russian narratives that explicitly link Mossad operations to Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory as false flag justifications, using the specific manipulated videos as evidence of Russian fabrication. Provide verified intelligence to strategic decision-makers and IO elements for immediate, public, and aggressive counter-messaging. (Supports CR 1, 5, 6)
  2. CRITICAL PRIORITY: INTENSIFY ISR ON SUMY (Yablonovka/Yunakovka) AND NOVOPAVLIVKA DIRECTION (Komar/Koptevo). Divert all significant ISR assets (IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT) to these areas. Prioritize identifying Russian force composition, logistics build-up, and intent (fixing operations vs. major offensive), and verify any deployment of Ukrainian reserves. (Supports CR 2)
  3. CRITICAL PRIORITY: ASSESS GEOMAGNETIC STORM IMPACT. Immediately assess potential effects of the geomagnetic storm on friendly and enemy navigation, communication, and AD systems. Implement mitigation measures for friendly forces and exploit potential enemy vulnerabilities. (Supports CR 3)
  4. CRITICAL PRIORITY: VERIFY "YASTREB-AV" RADAR DESTRUCTION. Immediately task ISR to confirm the destruction or critical damage of the Russian "Yastreb-AV" radar in Donetsk Oblast. (Supports CR 4).
  5. CONTINUOUS COUNTER-SABOTAGE INTELLIGENCE. Reinforce intelligence efforts to identify and disrupt Russian-directed railway sabotage networks, particularly in light of increased hybrid threat.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. MAINTAIN HIGHEST AIR DEFENSE READINESS ACROSS ALL OBLASTS, ESPECIALLY KHARKIV, DONETSK, DNIPROPETROVSK, CHERNIHIV, SUMY, ZAPORIZHZHIA, AND KYIV. Anticipate Russia may increase the intensity or breadth of aerial attacks (UAVs and ballistic missiles, KABs) to capitalize on global distraction. Ensure layered AD coverage for critical infrastructure and population centers. Prioritize resources for ballistic missile interception.
  2. ENHANCE BORDER SECURITY AGAINST DRONES & KABS. Increase air defense coverage and rapid response capabilities in northern border regions like Chernihiv and Sumy against persistent kamikaze drone and KAB threats.
  3. PROTECT CIVILIAN LOGISTICS AND HUMANITARIAN AID. Develop and disseminate specific TTPs for protecting civilian vehicles, demining teams, and humanitarian operations from FPV drone attacks, considering Russia's observed targeting of civilian vehicles.
  4. ADAPT TO GEOMAGNETIC STORM: Implement contingency plans for AD systems, radar, and communications that may be affected by the geomagnetic storm. Emphasize manual backup procedures where automation is degraded.

• Ground Forces:

  1. MAINTAIN DISCIPLINED DEFENSIVE POSTURE IN SUMY (Yablonovka/Yunakovka) AND NOVOPAVLIVKA DIRECTION (Komar/Koptevo). Commanders on these axes must remain prepared for potential increased ground probing or offensive actions, but continue to exercise extreme caution against committing strategic reserves until Russian intent and force composition are definitively confirmed. Avoid being drawn into attritional engagements on axes that are primarily diversionary, unless it is confirmed as a major new offensive requiring immediate strategic response. (Supports CR 2)
  2. CONTINUE ATTRITIONAL DEFENSE ON EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AXES. Maintain robust, attritional defense on the key axes (e.g., Pokrovsk, Toretsk, Lyman direction), exploiting costly Russian assault tactics to degrade their forces, as indicated by AFU General Staff updates and the increase in Russian surrenders.
  3. CONTINUE COUNTER-UAV MEASURES. Reinforce and practice counter-FPV drone and anti-UAV tactics at all echelons, including electronic warfare countermeasures and integrated air defense. Ensure all units are aware of Russian drone tactics against PVDs and vehicles.
  4. MAXIMIZE PSYOP OPPORTUNITIES. Leverage successes like the increase in drone-induced surrenders of Russian soldiers (Lyman direction), the destruction of high-value assets (2S7 Pion, "Yastreb-AV" radar), and successful SSO strikes (Kherson C2) for further PSYOP campaigns, emphasizing the viability and safety of surrender and the effectiveness of Ukrainian forces.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE & AGGRESSIVE: COUNTER RUSSIAN NARRATIVES ON MIDDLE EAST IMPACT AND RISING OIL PRICES, ESPECIALLY FALSE FLAGS. Proactively counter Russian attempts to leverage the Israel-Iran conflict to diminish international support for Ukraine. Emphasize that aggression in one region (Iran) emboldens aggression in others (Ukraine), and that Ukraine's fight for sovereignty remains a cornerstone of global stability. Explicitly highlight that rising oil prices, a direct consequence of Middle East instability, financially benefit Moscow and fund its war against Ukraine, referencing Russian milblogger statements. Publicize the EU's €1 billion aid from Russian assets as a direct counter to this Russian strategy and proof of continued Western support. Crucially, immediately and forcefully debunk Russian attempts to link alleged Mossad covert operations to Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory, exposing this as a fabrication and a dangerous false flag justification, using forensic analysis of their manipulated videos. This is a critical message for Western audiences. (Supports CR 1, 5, 6)
  2. RAPID DEBUNKING OF MISINFORMATION. Establish a rapid response mechanism to immediately debunk unverified and sensationalized claims propagated by Russian state media and milbloggers regarding the Middle East conflict (e.g., high-value Iranian casualties like the General Staff Chief, specific missile types, false US involvement, fabricated Mossad links, Iranian "destruction" of Natanz unless independently verified). Highlight these as deliberate Russian disinformation tactics intended to distract from Ukraine. Expose Russian analysis of hypothetical US operations against Iran as a tool for fear-mongering and the use of simulated maps as part of IO. Actively counter narratives of "Western internal instability" using verifiable facts. (Supports CR 1, 6)
  3. PROMOTE UKRAINIAN SUCCESSES: Actively publicize the destruction of the Russian "Yastreb-AV" radar, SSO FPV drone strike on the Kherson C2, and the €1 billion EU aid from Russian assets to demonstrate Ukrainian effectiveness and continued international backing.
  4. MAINTAIN DOMESTIC NARRATIVE FOCUS. Continue to emphasize Ukrainian resilience and successes (e.g., successful UAV interceptions, deep cyberattacks, increase in Russian surrenders, police operations against arms trafficking, SBU action against propagandists, drone development policy, legal actions against propagandists) to maintain public morale amidst external geopolitical turbulence and internal threats. Utilize daily enemy loss reports to demonstrate progress. Reinforce national unity through remembrance events. Address utility outages transparently.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. IMMEDIATE & PROACTIVE: ENGAGE KEY PARTNERS ON SUSTAINED SUPPORT. Ukrainian diplomatic missions should immediately engage with US, EU, and other key partners to highlight the potential for the Middle East escalation to divert attention or resources, and to advocate for continued, robust military and financial support for Ukraine. Explicitly present the Russian disinformation campaign as evidence of Moscow's intent to exploit the crisis, and highlight the financial benefit Russia gains from rising oil prices due to regional instability. Strongly advocate for the swift and expanded leveraging of frozen Russian assets, citing the recent €1 billion success. (Supports CR 5)
  2. COORDINATE WITH ALLIES ON IO STRATEGY: Seek to coordinate with allied intelligence and information agencies on a unified strategy to counter Russian disinformation regarding the Middle East, especially false flag narratives and manipulated videos, and maintain focus on Ukraine. (Supports CR 1, 5, 6)
  3. INTERNATIONAL CONDEMNATION OF CIVILIAN TARGETING. Work with international partners to secure swift and strong condemnation of Russian attacks against civilian populations (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk fatality, Zaporizhzhia casualties) and continued KAB strikes on Donetsk, emphasizing this as a breach of international law.