Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 13 JUN 25 / 00:00 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 12 JUN 25 / 23:15 ZULU - 13 JUN 25 / 00:00 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Donetsk Oblast (Chasiv Yar): New intel from "Военкор Котенок" indicates a specific area of interest within Chasiv Yar, near "ул. Днепровская," marked by an arrow on a digital map. This suggests continued Russian tactical focus on this critical urban strongpoint, likely for ground assault planning or target identification. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for specific target, HIGH for continued Russian focus on Chasiv Yar)
• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast: Ukrainian Air Force (Повітряні Сили ЗС України) reports a group of UAVs (likely Shahed-type) transiting from Donetsk Oblast towards Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. This confirms continued Russian aerial threats against this region, following previous reports of ground incursions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Border Oblasts: STERNENKO reports "drone safety" concerns in Nizhny Novgorod, Bryansk, Kaluga, Oryol, Kursk, Belgorod, and Tula Oblasts. This indicates recent Ukrainian drone activity or heightened vigilance by Russian forces in these border and deeper Russian territories. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for reported concerns, MEDIUM for specific Ukrainian drone activity)
• Kherson/Mykolaiv/Zaporizhzhia: Previous reports of KAB launches towards Zaporizhzhia and Shahed transits towards Mykolaiv remain valid, indicating continued Russian aerial pressure in the southern direction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new weather information. Previous severe storm conditions (strong winds, heavy rain) at an unspecified location could still impact operations if widespread.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Maintaining vigilance and reporting on aerial threats (Dnipropetrovsk).
  • Ukrainian deep strike capabilities likely continue to prompt "drone safety" measures in Russian border regions. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, based on STERNENKO's report implying Ukrainian action)
• Russian Forces:
  • Persistent Aerial Threat: Continued deployment of UAVs towards Dnipropetrovsk indicates sustained pressure on new axes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Continued Offensive in Donetsk: The "Военкор Котенок" map overlay suggests ongoing planning or operational focus on Chasiv Yar. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Enhanced Air Defense/Vigilance: "Drone safety" alerts across multiple Russian oblasts indicate increased Russian defensive measures or heightened alert status against Ukrainian UAVs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities:
  • Sustained Aerial Attacks: Russia maintains high capability for deploying Shahed UAVs against multiple Ukrainian oblasts, now extending to Dnipropetrovsk. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Persistent Ground Pressure: Continues to plan and execute ground operations aimed at strategic objectives like Chasiv Yar. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Warfare Adaptation: Continues to employ sophisticated IO, using emotionally charged narratives (e.g., "man-hunters" in Odesa) to discredit Ukrainian state institutions and undermine morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Adaptive Security Measures: Demonstrates capability to implement "drone safety" measures in response to Ukrainian UAV activity, suggesting a degree of internal vigilance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Expand Operational Focus: Intent to extend aerial pressure to Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, likely in support of or in conjunction with ground incursions reported in the previous daily summary. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Seize Key Terrain: Maintain intent to capture strategic locations such as Chasiv Yar. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Degrade Ukrainian Morale and State Legitimacy: Actively seeks to sow distrust in Ukrainian authorities and reduce public support for mobilization. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Protect Russian Territory: Intent to defend against Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (Continued Multi-Axis Aerial Campaign): Russia will continue to launch Shahed UAVs and KABs against targets in Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, and Sumy Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 2 (Ground Offensive in Donetsk): Russia will likely continue ground assaults in the Chasiv Yar sector, attempting to exploit any identified tactical vulnerabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 3 (Intensified IO on Mobilization/Law Enforcement): Russia will escalate its propaganda campaigns aimed at discrediting Ukrainian mobilization efforts and law enforcement actions, portraying them as oppressive or illegal. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• The shift of UAVs from Donetsk to Dnipropetrovsk indicates an adaptation to support or complement reported ground incursions in that direction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• The "man-hunter" narrative from Colonelcassad represents an adaptation in Russian IO, moving from general battlefield claims to specific, emotive narratives designed to undermine Ukrainian social cohesion and trust in institutions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• UK Production of M777s: TASS reporting on the UK opening M777 howitzer production in Sheffield suggests a potential long-term boost for Ukrainian artillery sustainment. While a UK source, TASS chose to report it, indicating Russia's awareness of sustained Western military-industrial support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• No new information on Russian logistics. Continued air/UAV operations suggest sustained capacity.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian IO C2: Colonelcassad's immediate dissemination of highly provocative video and text (Odesa "man-hunters") demonstrates rapid, centralized C2 for information operations, designed for maximum emotional impact. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Military C2: The "DIVGEN" map image, if indeed from Russian planning, suggests an active military C2 focused on specific tactical objectives like Chasiv Yar. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense Alert: Ukrainian Air Force remains alert and provides timely updates on UAV movements, indicating effective tracking capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Vigilance against Hybrid Threats: The necessity for a strong IO response to narratives like the "man-hunters" in Odesa highlights the ongoing need for vigilance against hybrid attacks on social cohesion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Information Environment Challenge: The Odesa "man-hunter" narrative, if widely believed, poses a significant challenge to Ukrainian morale and trust in government. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Artillery Sustainment: The UK's M777 production, if confirmed, represents a potential long-term success in securing artillery sustainment, though the timeframe for impact is distant. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Assets: Continued high volume of Russian UAVs across multiple axes (now including Dnipropetrovsk) underscores the continuous need for robust air defense systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• IO Resources: The sophisticated and emotive nature of Russian IO (Odesa incident) highlights the critical requirement for well-resourced and agile Ukrainian information operations capabilities to counter real-time narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives (Escalating):

  • "Man-Hunters" / Forced Mobilization: Colonelcassad's video and caption on the Odesa incident is a deliberate and highly inflammatory attempt to delegitimize Ukrainian mobilization efforts and law enforcement, portraying them as violent "man-hunters" in an "abnormal country." This aims to incite panic, distrust, and resistance to conscription within Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Western Military Production: TASS reporting on M777 production likely aims to frame Western aid as a long-term threat, justifying continued Russian aggression.
  • Focus on Russian Internal Security: TASS reporting on a US Senator being "twisted" by security (L.A. incident) is a likely attempt to mirror accusations of state repression, creating a "whataboutism" deflection from Russian domestic issues. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives/Initiatives:

  • Ukrainian Air Force's immediate public updates on drone movements maintain transparency and build public trust.
  • STERNENKO's report on "drone safety" in Russian oblasts serves as a subtle counter-narrative, implying Ukrainian deep strike capability.

• Dempster-Shafer Beliefs (Updated after Previous Daily Report Analysis):

  • Uncertainty (0.563494): Remains the largest component.
  • Internal Security: Political Unrest in United States (0.119257): This is triggered by the TASS report on the US Senator incident, reflecting a Russian attempt to exploit perceived internal issues in the US for propaganda.
  • Internal Security: Civil Disobedience in United States (0.056026): Similar to the above, reflects the broader narrative.
  • Technology Deployment: Introduction of New Weapon System by UK (0.004964): Directly linked to the M777 production report.
  • Logistical Shift: Resource Acquisition by UK from BAE Systems (0.000030): Also linked to M777 production.
  • CRITICAL INTELLIGENCE GAP REMAINS: The D-S model still fails to adequately capture the scale and sophistication of Russian information warfare within Ukraine, particularly narratives like the "man-hunters" that directly attack internal social cohesion and state legitimacy. The low belief for "Information Warfare: Propaganda Effort by [Side]" (0.000000) is a major discrepancy.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: The "man-hunter" narrative directly targets public sentiment regarding mobilization, potentially eroding trust and willingness to serve. This is a significant threat to morale, particularly if it spreads unchecked. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Morale: Managed through a mix of perceived external threats (Western military aid) and internal distractions (e.g., US security incidents).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• EU Energy Sanctions: RBK-Ukraina reports Hungary and Slovakia agreeing to boycott the EU's refusal to buy Russian gas and oil. This highlights continued fragmentation within the EU on sanctions policy, which could indirectly benefit Russia by maintaining energy revenue streams and undermining unified EU action. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained Aerial Pressure on Dnipropetrovsk: Russia will continue to launch UAVs and potentially KABs into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, aiming to support or confuse defenses around the ongoing ground incursions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intensified Ground Pressure on Chasiv Yar: Russia will maintain high-tempo ground assaults on Chasiv Yar, leveraging any tactical advantages identified from reconnaissance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Aggressive Information Warfare Campaign on Mobilization: Russia will escalate its IO campaign, actively disseminating emotionally charged narratives (e.g., "man-hunters") aimed at undermining Ukrainian mobilization efforts, public trust in authorities, and internal social cohesion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Exploitation of EU Disunity: Russia will seek to further exploit disagreements within the EU (e.g., Hungary/Slovakia on energy) to weaken allied support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Coordinated Ground Offensive with Deep IO Penetration: Russia successfully pushes into Dnipropetrovsk, coinciding with a highly effective, mass-reach IO campaign inciting significant civil resistance to mobilization or widespread distrust in authorities, leading to a breakdown in order in some rear areas. This could force Ukraine to divert significant resources to internal stability. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Targeted Strike on Key Mobilization Infrastructure: Russia might launch precision strikes (e.g., Kalibrs, upgraded drones) against military recruitment centers, internal security HQs, or training facilities, leveraging the "man-hunter" narrative to justify the attacks and further disrupt mobilization efforts. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • IO: Expect immediate proliferation of the "man-hunter" narrative across Russian and pro-Russian channels. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • ISR: Prioritize real-time ISR on Dnipropetrovsk Oblast to track UAV movements and identify potential new targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Short Term (Next 6-12 hours):
  • IO: Ukrainian forces must develop and deploy immediate counter-narratives to the "man-hunter" propaganda. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground: Monitor Chasiv Yar for any intensified Russian ground assaults. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Mid Term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • AD: Maintain heightened air defense readiness in Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Mykolaiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Diplomatic: Ukrainian diplomats should engage with EU partners to mitigate the impact of Hungary/Slovakia's stance on energy sanctions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, HUMINT, OSINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: REAL-TIME IO ANALYSIS AND COUNTER-NARRATIVE DEVELOPMENT. Immediately task OSINT and HUMINT to monitor the spread and impact of the "man-hunter" narrative (Odesa) and other similar emotionally charged Russian propaganda regarding mobilization. Develop and disseminate verified, factual, and emotionally resonant counter-narratives via all available channels. This is paramount to maintaining public trust and morale. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, HUMINT).
  2. IMMEDIATE PRIORITY: DRONE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS. Maintain constant ISR on UAV movements into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, analyzing flight paths, targets, and potential coordination with ground operations. (Collection Requirement: SIGINT, IMINT).
  3. CONTINUOUS: CHASHIV YAR MONITORING. Maintain close ISR on Chasiv Yar, focusing on Russian troop movements, engineering efforts, and any indications of prepared assaults (e.g., changes in artillery density). (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, OSINT).
  4. EU DIPLOMATIC FEEDBACK: Provide real-time intelligence to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Russian efforts to exploit EU internal disagreements on sanctions, specifically the Hungary/Slovakia stance on energy. (Collection Requirement: OSINT).

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. MAINTAIN HIGH ALERT IN SOUTHERN AND CENTRAL OBLASTS. Ensure layered air defense coverage for Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Kharkiv, and Sumy Oblasts, prioritizing defense of critical infrastructure and population centers against UAV and KAB attacks.
  2. TARGET HARDENING: Advise critical infrastructure operators in threatened regions (especially Dnipropetrovsk) to enhance physical security and hardening measures against drone strikes.

• Ground Forces:

  1. INTEGRATE IO CONCERNS INTO TTPs. Commanders should brief personnel on Russian IO tactics (e.g., "man-hunter" narratives) and provide clear guidance on legal and ethical conduct during mobilization efforts to prevent real incidents from being exploited by enemy propaganda. Emphasize professionalism and adherence to regulations.
  2. DEFENSIVE READINESS IN DONETSK: Maintain robust defensive lines in the Chasiv Yar sector, preparing for continued attritional assaults.
  3. ADAPT TO WEATHER: If severe weather persists, commanders should adjust operations to account for degraded visibility, mobility, and ISR, while also identifying potential windows for adversary exploitation.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. URGENT: PROACTIVELY COUNTER "MAN-HUNTER" NARRATIVES. Launch a sophisticated, multi-platform campaign to immediately refute and discredit Russian propaganda regarding mobilization and law enforcement. This should include:
     • Clear, factual explanations of mobilization procedures and legal rights.
     • Showcasing positive interactions between military/law enforcement and civilians.
     • Exposing the manipulative and deceptive nature of Russian propaganda (e.g., showing the Odesa video context if available, or highlighting the pattern of Russian attempts to destabilize Ukrainian society).
     • Emphasize the shared responsibility for defense and the heroism of those serving.
  2. AMPLIFY WESTERN AID IMPACT. Publicize details of international military aid, including the UK's M777 production, to demonstrate sustained international support and long-term Ukrainian capabilities, countering Russian attempts to demoralize.
  3. EXPOSE RUSSIAN HYPOCRISY. Highlight the TASS report on the US Senator incident as a transparent attempt by Russia to deflect from its own internal repression and human rights abuses.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. ENGAGE EU PARTNERS ON ENERGY SANCTIONS. Ukrainian diplomatic missions to the EU and member states should immediately engage with counterparts to address the Hungary/Slovakia stance on Russian energy, emphasizing the importance of unified action and the long-term strategic implications for energy security.
  2. ADVOCATE FOR CONTINUED AD/EW SUPPORT. Use intelligence on persistent and evolving Russian aerial threats (new drone axes) to advocate for continued and increased provision of advanced air defense and electronic warfare systems from international partners.