Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 12 JUN 25 / 22:30 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 12 JUN 25 / 21:43 ZULU - 12 JUN 25 / 22:30 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Novopavlivka Direction (Donetsk Oblast): RYBAR (Russian milblogger) has released a tactical map and embedded reconnaissance video, dated 12 JUN 25, depicting the Novopavlivka direction. This suggests continued Russian interest and potential activity in this sector, consistent with previous reporting regarding a potential push towards the critical logistics hub of Novopavlivka. This also correlates with previous concerns about the Dnipropetrovsk axis leading to Novopavlivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for information release, MEDIUM for active combat significance, HIGH for potential correlation with Dnipropetrovsk)
• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast: No new direct reporting on ground incursions in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast in this period, but the Novopavlivka focus from Russian sources remains relevant to this potential axis of advance.

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new significant weather or environmental factors reported.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces: No new information on specific Ukrainian force dispositions in this period. Continued defensive posture on the Pokrovsk axis (previous report) implies high readiness.
• Russian Forces:
  • Persistent Focus on Eastern Front: The new RYBAR map and video imagery for Novopavlivka confirms continued Russian operational focus on the eastern front, particularly Donetsk Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Operations (IO) / Psychological Operations (PSYOPs):
    • Justification of Historical Aggression: RYBAR is leveraging historical narratives (e.g., 1873 "destruction of slavery" in Central Asia, Crimean Khanate annexation) to frame Russian aggression as historically justified "liberation" and "eradication of hostile nests." This is a significant expansion of their historical revisionism efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Internal Ukrainian Discord/Demoralization: "Операция Z" is disseminating a video clip of a podcast discussion featuring "Nazi Seredyuk" discussing "propaganda and repression" in the context of Ukrainian mobilization. This is a deliberate attempt to portray Ukraine as totalitarian and demoralize Ukrainian citizens regarding mobilization. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
    • Monitoring of US Political Discourse: TASS reports a statement from Kellogg (US) on studying and combining Russian and Ukrainian proposals for conflict resolution, and a statement from Pentagon chief Hegset on not ordering a halt to cyber operations against Russia. This indicates continued Russian monitoring and selective reporting of US political and defense discourse to shape narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities:
  • Sustained Ground Operations: Russia maintains capability for sustained ground operations in Donetsk Oblast, particularly towards key objectives like Novopavlivka. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Sophisticated Information Warfare: Demonstrates highly agile and multi-faceted IO, actively employing historical revisionism and exploiting internal Ukrainian discourse to achieve strategic communication objectives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Advance on Novopavlivka/Donetsk: Intent remains to advance on the eastern front, likely targeting Novopavlivka as a key objective. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Justify Aggression & Undermine Ukrainian Resolve: Primary intent of IO is to justify the invasion historically and ideologically, while simultaneously attempting to demoralize Ukrainian forces and population by highlighting perceived internal repression and "Nazi" elements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (Novopavlivka Offensive): Russia will continue to concentrate forces and resources on the Novopavlivka direction, attempting to advance on this axis, supported by tactical drones for reconnaissance and targeting, as evidenced by the new RYBAR imagery. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 2 (Escalated Historical Revisionism): Russia will continue to deploy historical narratives to legitimize its invasion and annexation of Ukrainian territories, aiming to reshape international and domestic perceptions of the conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 3 (Targeted PSYOPs on Ukrainian Mobilization): Russia will intensify PSYOPs aimed at undermining Ukrainian mobilization efforts, portraying it as repressive and forced, to reduce morale and potentially increase draft evasion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• No significant tactical changes identified in this immediate reporting period. The release of a tactical map for Novopavlivka by a prominent milblogger suggests this remains a key area of focus for Russian forces.

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• No new information on Russian logistics or sustainment.

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian IO C2: Russian state media and affiliated milbloggers continue to demonstrate highly effective C2 in rapidly identifying and amplifying specific narratives (e.g., historical justifications, internal Ukrainian discourse). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• No new information on specific Ukrainian force posture or readiness in this period. Maintaining a robust defensive posture on all key axes, particularly Pokrovsk and now potentially Novopavlivka, remains critical.

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• No new tactical successes or setbacks reported in this immediate period.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Counter-IO Capabilities: The increased sophistication of Russian IO, particularly historical revisionism and targeting internal Ukrainian issues, highlights a critical need for robust Ukrainian counter-IO capabilities to debunk these narratives effectively. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:

  • "Historical Justification of Russian Aggression": RYBAR's use of historical parallels (Central Asia, Crimea) to legitimize current actions is a dangerous escalation of revisionist propaganda, attempting to frame Russia as a "liberator" or "civilizing force" rather than an aggressor. This is a core narrative shift.
  • "Ukrainian Government as Repressive and Nazi": "Операция Z" is pushing narratives portraying Ukrainian mobilization as forced and repressive, linking it to "Nazi" elements, aiming to demoralize the Ukrainian populace and create internal dissent.
  • "US Meddling/Weakness": TASS reporting on US discussions regarding peace proposals and cyber operations against Russia aims to portray the US as either trying to control the conflict or as ineffectual/divided, undermining confidence in Western support.

• Dempster-Shafer Beliefs (Updated after Previous Daily Report Analysis - No new beliefs added in this micro-period):

  • Information Warfare: Propaganda Effort by Side: Russia (0.369105): Still the highest, and remains accurate given the continued deluge of Russian IO.
  • Uncertainty (0.334676): Still significant due to the mix of reporting.
  • Geopolitical Shift: Recognition of Entity by Country: Russia of Russian-controlled territory in Zaporizhzhia Oblast (0.041996): Still relevant due to the ongoing consolidation efforts mentioned previously.
  • Information Warfare: Propaganda Effort by Domestic Actor (0.000342): Remains an intelligence gap. The model needs to be updated to better capture and weigh the significance of sophisticated domestic Russian IO efforts like historical revisionism. The current value drastically undervalues the impact of this.

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Subject to Russian PSYOPs targeting mobilization and domestic issues. Countering these narratives is essential to maintain morale.
• Russian Morale: Actively managed through propaganda narratives that increasingly seek historical justification for the current conflict, potentially to bolster internal support for a protracted war.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• TASS reports on US statements regarding peace proposals indicate Russia's continued efforts to influence international perceptions of the conflict and potentially shape diplomatic discourse in their favor.

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Continued Offensive Operations on Novopavlivka Axis: Russia will likely continue ground operations aimed at the Novopavlivka direction, employing reconnaissance assets (UAVs) to gather intelligence and target Ukrainian positions, consistent with the released RYBAR map. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intensified Multi-Layered Information Warfare: Russia will significantly escalate its multi-layered information warfare campaign, heavily relying on historical revisionism to justify its actions, and simultaneously attempting to sow internal discord within Ukraine by targeting mobilization efforts and portraying the Ukrainian government negatively. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Continued Monitoring and Exploitation of Western Discourse: Russia will persist in monitoring and selectively reporting on Western political and defense statements to craft narratives that aim to undermine Western support for Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Significant Breakthrough on Novopavlivka with Strategic Exploitation: Russia achieves a decisive breakthrough on the Novopavlivka axis, rapidly exploiting it to seize key logistical infrastructure or threaten vital communication lines, forcing a major Ukrainian withdrawal and threatening the Dnipropetrovsk region. This would likely be preceded or accompanied by a coordinated, massive disinformation campaign aiming to create panic and misdirection. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Highly Effective Internal Destabilization PSYOPs: Russian PSYOPs, particularly those targeting Ukrainian mobilization and societal cohesion, gain significant traction, leading to widespread demoralization, increased draft evasion, and internal unrest, directly impacting Ukraine's ability to sustain defensive operations. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • IO: Monitor for immediate follow-up Russian messaging on Novopavlivka. Begin immediate analysis and formulation of counter-narratives to the historical revisionism and "Ukrainian repression" narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • ISR: Prioritize real-time ISR on the Novopavlivka direction to detect any immediate changes in Russian force disposition or offensive preparation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Short Term (Next 6-12 hours):
  • Ground Operations: Anticipate continued, possibly intensified, probing or assaults on the Novopavlivka axis. Ensure forces in this sector are prepared. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • IO: Disseminate initial counter-narratives widely through official channels. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Mid Term (Next 24-72 hours):
  • STRATCOM/IO: Launch a sustained campaign to expose and refute Russian historical revisionism, highlighting factual inaccuracies and the nature of their aggression. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Personnel: Monitor indicators of public sentiment regarding mobilization in response to Russian PSYOPs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR, TECHINT, HUMINT critical):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: ISR on Novopavlivka Axis. Immediately redirect and intensify IMINT and SIGINT collection on the Novopavlivka direction to corroborate Russian claims and assess actual force movements, intentions, and potential for a significant offensive. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, BDA).
  2. IMMEDIATE PRIORITY: Counter-IO Analysis & Development. Establish a dedicated team to rapidly analyze new Russian IO narratives, particularly the historical revisionism (Central Asia, Crimea) and the "Ukrainian repression/Nazi" narratives. Develop and disseminate proactive, fact-based counter-narratives through all available channels. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, HUMINT).
  3. CONTINUOUS: EXPLOIT RUSSIAN IO MANIPULATION. Continue to systematically track and analyze Russian attempts to exploit incidents (e.g., US SecDef comments, internal US politics) for propaganda. Develop and disseminate proactive counter-narratives. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, HUMINT).

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. MAINTAIN HIGH ALERT ON POKROVSK/NOVOPAVLIVKA. Ensure robust and layered air defense coverage for Ukrainian forces and critical infrastructure supporting operations in the Donetsk Oblast, as Russian aviation and drones will be heavily utilized in offensive operations.
  2. ENHANCE COUNTER-DRONE MEASURES. Continue accelerated deployment of mobile EW and counter-UAV systems, particularly to ground units operating in high-threat areas like Pokrovsk and Novopavlivka.

• Ground Forces:

  1. HOLD THE LINE ON NOVOPAVLIVKA/POKROVSK. Prioritize reinforcement and resupply of units engaged in defensive operations on the Novopavlivka and Pokrovsk axes. Maintain robust defensive lines and prepare for potential counter-attacks against Russian advances.
  2. INTEGRATE DRONE INTELLIGENCE. Ensure frontline units have immediate access to tactical intelligence, including imagery from UAVs (like those seen in RYBAR's post), to enhance situational awareness and targeting.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. CRITICAL: COUNTER HISTORICAL REVISIONISM IMMEDIATELY. Launch a multi-platform, multi-language campaign to expose and refute Russian historical revisionism, clearly articulating the factual history of aggression and occupation, specifically addressing the Crimean Khanate and Central Asian historical claims. Frame these as desperate attempts to justify war crimes.
  2. CRITICAL: DEBUNK "UKRAINIAN REPRESSION/NAZI" NARRATIVES. Proactively counter Russian claims that portray Ukrainian mobilization as forced or repressive, or that link Ukrainian governance to "Nazism." Highlight the voluntary nature of patriotic service, democratic processes, and unity of purpose against an aggressor.
  3. CONTINUE TO HIGHLIGHT UKRAINIAN RESILIENCE. Counter Russian attempts to demoralize Ukrainian forces and citizens by consistently highlighting Ukrainian resilience, unity, and tactical successes (e.g., drone effectiveness, thwarting terror plots).
  4. EXPOSE RUSSIAN WAR CRIMES. Continue to widely publicize evidence of Russian war crimes and deliberate targeting of civilians to discredit Russian narratives and maintain international condemnation.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. COORDINATE COUNTER-DISINFORMATION EFFORTS. Work closely with allied governments and public diplomacy channels to present a unified front against Russian historical revisionism and narratives of Ukrainian internal weakness. Provide allies with accurate, concise talking points to counter Russian narratives.
  2. ADVOCATE FOR CONTINUED MILITARY AID. Use confirmed intelligence on persistent Russian aggression and the intensification of multi-domain warfare (including sophisticated IO) to advocate for sustained and expedited provision of critical military aid, alongside support for Ukrainian STRATCOM capabilities.