Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 12 JUN 25 / 08:41 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 12 JUN 25 / 08:11 ZULU - 12 JUN 25 / 08:41 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Eastern Ukraine (Donetsk Oblast):
  • NO CHANGE: Russian sources (Basurin o glavnom) continue to claim "clearing" operations in the vicinity of Dzerzhinsk, indicating sustained, localized ground engagements. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • NEW: STERNENKO reports successful Ukrainian drone strikes by "Aivengo and Friends" destroying Russian logistics on the Kurakhove direction. This confirms localized Ukrainian counter-logistics and precision strike capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Northern Ukraine (Sumy Oblast):
  • NO CHANGE: Ukrainian Air Force (Повітряні Сили ЗС України) reports continued KAB launches directed at Sumy Oblast, indicating sustained Russian air assault and shaping operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Southern Ukraine (Zaporizhzhia Oblast):
  • NEW: Zaporizhzhia Oblast Military Administration reports an FPV drone strike on a civilian house in a frontline community, confirming continued Russian deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure and terror tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Southern Ukraine (Dnipropetrovsk Oblast):
  • NEW: Russian source (Dnevnik Desantnika🇷🇺) claims a strike by Russian Armed Forces on the 58th Reactive Artillery Battalion in Vasylkivka, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. This indicates continued Russian deep strikes into Dnipropetrovsk and potential counter-battery efforts. (CONFIDENCE: LOW, Russian milblogger claim, lacks independent verification of target or BDA)
  • NEW: Russian milblogger Colonelcassad claims Russian troops have reached the administrative borders of Donetsk People's Republic (DPR) in two areas, including "Novopavlivka (already in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast)." This, combined with the previous daily report's mention of probing attacks into Dnipropetrovsk, suggests a potential new axis of Russian ground advance or a significant fixing operation. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, Russian milblogger claim, requires independent verification, particularly on the "already in Dnipropetrovsk" claim)
• Russian Deep Rear:
  • NEW: Russian sources (Север.Реалии) report a cyberattack on the Chebarkul city administration by "anti-Western Russian hackers" demanding ransom. This is an internal Russian issue, highlighting potential internal cyber threats or criminal activity, and provides no direct military intelligence on the conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • NEW: Iran announces the launch of a new uranium enrichment center in a "safe place" in response to an IAEA anti-Iran resolution (TASS). This is a geopolitical development unrelated to the immediate conflict but affects the global security environment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• The confirmed FPV drone strike on a civilian house in Zaporizhzhia, and repeated FPV drone attacks documented by Russian sources, indicate continued favorable weather conditions for UAV operations.
• Continued KAB launches require clear to partly cloudy conditions for effective targeting.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Air Defense: BŪTUSOV ПЛЮС reports 176 Russian UAVs shot down in a month by one unit. While the specific unit is not identified, this number is a significant indicator of continued high-volume Russian drone attacks and successful Ukrainian AD intercepts, but also highlights the persistent threat. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, unit claim, requires broader corroboration for total numbers)
  • Counter-UAV & Precision Strike: Ukrainian forces (STERNENKO) continue to effectively use drones to destroy Russian logistics (Kurakhove direction). (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Border Guard Service: The "Sily Oborony Pivdnya Ukrayiny" channel's promotional video for Vadym Boichenko (border guard from Kherson) highlights the continued role and resilience of border guard units in the south. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH, informational)
  • Air Defense Mobilization: Russian source ("Operatsiya Z") claims Ukrainian General Staff ordered mobilization of mobile AD groups. This is a credible adaptation by Ukrainian forces in response to massed aerial threats. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, Russian milblogger claim, but aligns with Ukrainian needs)
  • Personnel Readiness: The increase in Kharkiv civilian casualties (18 injured, 4 children) reported by "Operatyvnyi ZSU" indicates the continued high threat to civilian population centers and places demands on medical and emergency services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces:
  • UAV Operations: TASS and Basurin o glavnom videos confirm continued and aggressive use of FPV drones for precision targeting of Ukrainian personnel (mortar crews), logistics (vehicles), and armored vehicles. TASS mentions "optically-guided kamikaze drones" ("оптоволоконным дроном-камикадзе") which could refer to a new FPV variant or a specific targeting system, requiring further analysis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground Operations: Continued "clearing operations" near Dzerzhinsk (Donetsk) and alleged advances towards Novopavlivka (Dnipropetrovsk) indicate sustained ground pressure. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Air Assault: Continued KAB launches on Sumy and Donetsk Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information Operations: Continues to leverage national holidays (Russia Day) for patriotic narratives (Kotsnews, Operatyvnyi ZSU video of Putin) and spread disinformation (Rubio statement). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities:
  • FPV Drone Warfare: Russia demonstrates highly effective and integrated FPV drone capabilities, capable of multiple precision strikes against infantry, vehicles, and armored targets, potentially including new optically-guided variants. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Sustained Aerial Campaign: Continues high volume of KAB and Shahed-type drone attacks, aiming to exhaust Ukrainian AD and inflict casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Limited Ground Advances: Maintains capability for localized tactical gains and probing operations in contested areas and potentially new axes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Sophisticated IO: Continues to coordinate internal propaganda and external disinformation, aiming to demoralize Ukraine and influence international opinion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Maintain Attrition & Pressure: Continue to degrade Ukrainian combat capabilities through persistent artillery and drone strikes, and localized ground assaults. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Expand Operational Areas: The claims of reaching Dnipropetrovsk border areas indicate a potential intent to open new operational axes or force Ukraine to disperse reserves. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Terrorize Civilian Population: The FPV strike on a civilian house in Zaporizhzhia indicates continued intent to terrorize the civilian population and undermine morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Exploit Information Environment: Leverage every opportunity to promote narratives of Russian strength and internal Western disunity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (Sustained Attrition & FPV Focus): Russia will continue high-intensity ground assaults on existing fronts (Donetsk), supported by heavy artillery and a highly integrated FPV drone effort targeting Ukrainian personnel, equipment, and logistics. Aerial attacks with KABs and Shaheds will continue on border regions (Sumy, Donetsk) and potentially deeper into Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • COA 2 (New Axis Probes & Fixing Operations): Russia will escalate probing attacks and reconnaissance-in-force operations into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast from the Donetsk axis, potentially aiming to fix Ukrainian reserves or prepare for a larger offensive. They will concurrently continue shaping operations on the Sumy axis. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)
  • COA 3 (Intensified IO & Disinformation): Russia will intensify its information operations, utilizing Russia Day narratives, fabricating statements from Western officials (Rubio), and amplifying claims of tactical success and new drone technologies to influence both domestic and international audiences. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• The reported "optically-guided kamikaze drones" by TASS (Rubicon FPV) suggest an ongoing refinement of FPV drone capabilities, potentially enhancing their precision or all-weather performance. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, requires technical verification)
• The claimed Russian advances towards the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border suggest a potential new operational focus or a significant feint to draw Ukrainian resources. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• The alleged order for Ukrainian mobile AD groups mobilization (Russian source) indicates Ukraine's rapid adaptation to the increasing volume and sophistication of Russian aerial attacks. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian logistics (Kurakhove direction) continue to pose challenges to Russian sustainment, albeit localized. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• The continued reliance on Russian state media and milbloggers to highlight military successes (Tyulpan, FPV strikes) is a constant effort to maintain internal support, indicating the importance of public perception for sustainment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Appears effective in coordinating FPV drone strikes with reconnaissance assets. The potential expansion of ground operations to new axes (Dnipropetrovsk) would require effective strategic C2. The internal cyberattack on Chebarkul indicates a potential vulnerability in Russian state digital infrastructure, though not directly military. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)
• Ukrainian C2: The reported mobilization of mobile AD groups suggests a responsive C2 structure adapting to evolving threats. Continued effective deep strikes on Russian logistics indicates effective intelligence-to-strike C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense Readiness: High, with continued successful intercepts of Russian UAVs and reported mobilization of mobile AD groups, demonstrating a proactive adaptation to the air threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Counter-Logistics & Precision Strike: Demonstrated capability to target and destroy Russian logistics and equipment on the frontlines using drones. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Border Security: Border Guard Service maintains a resilient posture in southern regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Successful drone strikes on Russian logistics on the Kurakhove direction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Continued high rate of Russian UAV intercepts by Ukrainian AD. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Setbacks:
  • Continued civilian casualties in Kharkiv due to Russian air attacks, highlighting the persistent threat to urban centers. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • FPV drone strike on a civilian house in Zaporizhzhia demonstrates continued Russian terror tactics and the difficulty of completely protecting civilian targets from small, agile threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Russian claims of hitting Ukrainian military targets (58th Reactive Artillery Battalion) and destroying Ukrainian mortar crews, transport, and armored vehicles with FPV drones highlight ongoing Russian successes in countering Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Critical Need: Continued and accelerated supply of diverse air defense systems and interceptors to counter massed and varied aerial threats (KABs, Shaheds, FPVs). Mobile AD groups are crucial.
• Urgent Need: Continued supply of advanced ISR drones and FPV drones for Ukrainian forces to maintain battlefield awareness and precision strike capabilities against Russian ground forces and logistics.
• Civilian Protection: Resources for medical and emergency services in areas under constant aerial attack (Kharkiv) remain critical.

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Military Effectiveness: Amplifying claims of successful FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian military equipment and personnel (mortar crews, armored vehicles) to project strength and demoralize Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Justification for Aggression: The Russian attempt to attribute a fabricated "congratulations" from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Russia Day is a blatant disinformation campaign designed to sow doubt and division within the US-Ukraine alliance and legitimize Russian actions internationally. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Patriotism & National Unity: Continued leveraging of Russia Day with celebratory videos (Putin's speech, Manegnaya Square events) to foster domestic unity and support for the war. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Attributing Blame: The FPV strike on a civilian house, while conducted by Russia, is framed by the Russian side as a "terror" operation by Ukraine or justified as targeting military objects, as is standard Russian practice. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Highlighting Russian Atrocities: Immediately reporting on civilian casualties in Kharkiv and the FPV strike on a civilian house in Zaporizhzhia to expose Russian terror tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Debunking Disinformation: The rapid identification and exposure of the fake Marco Rubio statement is a critical counter-IO success, demonstrating Ukraine's vigilance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Showcasing Resilience & Effectiveness: Emphasizing successful Ukrainian AD intercepts and drone strikes on Russian logistics to maintain morale and demonstrate continued combat effectiveness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Focus on National Identity: The Border Guard Service's promotional video for Vadym Boichenko is part of a broader effort to highlight the resilience and heroism of Ukrainian defenders. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Remains high due to combat successes and effective counter-IO, but is severely tested by persistent civilian casualties in major urban centers like Kharkiv and the continued targeting of civilian infrastructure. The threat to new regions (Dnipropetrovsk) will also be a factor. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Morale: Likely bolstered by Russia Day celebrations and propaganda highlighting military "successes." However, deep internal issues (like the mobilized payment problem from the previous report) and the impact of Ukrainian deep strikes are likely being carefully managed. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Russian Diplomacy: Iran's decision to launch a new uranium enrichment center in response to an IAEA resolution indicates continued challenges to international non-proliferation efforts, potentially providing Russia with diplomatic leverage or new partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Western Alliance Stability: The fabricated Marco Rubio statement underscores ongoing Russian attempts to undermine US-Ukraine relations and sow discord within the Western alliance. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Efforts: Ukraine continues to leverage international platforms to report on Russian atrocities and request aid, as evidenced by reporting on civilian casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Intensified FPV/UAV Warfare & Attritional Ground Attacks (Next 24-48 hours): Russia will continue high-intensity, attritional ground assaults on the Donetsk axis (Dzerzhinsk, Kurakhove, Pokrovsk) with strong emphasis on FPV drone and Lancet support for precision strikes against Ukrainian personnel, vehicles, and equipment. Massed KAB strikes will continue on Sumy and Donetsk Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Escalated Probes on New Axes (Next 24-72 hours): Russian forces will increase the scale and frequency of probing attacks into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, particularly from the claimed Novopavlivka axis, aiming to fix Ukrainian forces, conduct reconnaissance-in-force, or prepare for a larger offensive. Simultaneous, continued shaping operations on the Sumy axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Coordinated IO with Kinetic Actions (Ongoing): Russia will continue to synchronize its information operations with kinetic strikes, fabricating narratives to justify attacks and undermine Western support, particularly focusing on "punishment" for Ukrainian deep strikes and attempts to demonstrate Western "weakness" or "disunity." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Coordinated Offensive on New Axes (Next 48-72 hours): Russia transitions its probing attacks in Dnipropetrovsk and shaping operations in Sumy into simultaneous, large-scale ground offensives, supported by massed air (KABs, Shaheds) and missile strikes against Ukrainian AD and C2 nodes to overwhelm defenses and create a new operational front, forcing Ukraine to dangerously over-stretch its reserves. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM-HIGH)
• Sophisticated Hybrid Attack with WMD Threat (Next 24-72 hours): Russia attempts to execute a complex terror attack in a major Ukrainian city, potentially incorporating advanced FPV drone swarms with unconventional payloads (e.g., biological or chemical agents, if acquired, or high-explosive thermobaric), targeting public gatherings or critical infrastructure, aimed at inducing mass panic and diverting military resources. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, based on previous thwarted attempts and stated Russian intentions to use terror)
• Large-Scale Cyber Offensive to Support Kinetic Operations: Russia launches a highly disruptive cyberattack targeting Ukraine's military communications and command systems or critical energy infrastructure, synchronized with a massed kinetic strike, aiming to degrade Ukraine's ability to coordinate defense and response during a key offensive push. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • CRITICAL: Monitor Dnipropetrovsk Oblast for any escalation of Russian probing actions. Decision Point: Verify claims of Russian presence on the administrative border; pre-position rapid reaction forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • CRITICAL: Continue monitoring Sumy and Donetsk Oblasts for continued KAB and FPV drone launches, specifically targeting military and critical civilian infrastructure. Decision Point: Maintain highest AD readiness, re-task ISR for launch point identification. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Short Term (Next 6-12 hours):
  • Conduct rapid technical analysis of any newly identified FPV drone variants (e.g., "optically-guided kamikaze drones") to assess capabilities and develop countermeasures. Decision Point: Update force protection TTPs and EW parameters. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Monitor Russian and international media for any further dissemination of the fabricated Marco Rubio statement or similar disinformation. Decision Point: Launch proactive counter-IO campaigns to debunk immediately. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Assess the implications of Iran's new uranium enrichment center on regional stability and potential impacts on Russia's strategic alliances. Decision Point: Brief diplomatic and policy channels. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Intensify ISR coverage (IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT) on the Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy border regions. Prioritize identifying the exact scale, composition, and intent of Russian forces conducting probing attacks or shaping operations. Determine if the alleged advance into Dnipropetrovsk is a genuine territorial gain or an isolated penetration. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, OSINT, HUMINT)
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Rapidly analyze and exploit any captured or observed "optically-guided kamikaze drones" (e.g., Rubicon FPV) to understand their enhanced capabilities and develop specific countermeasures. Focus on targeting systems, range, and counter-EW effectiveness. (Collection Requirement: MASINT, TECHINT)
  3. CONTINUE HIGH PRIORITY: Maintain and increase ISR coverage on Russian FPV drone launch sites and operator teams across all active fronts. Prioritize ISR-to-strike targeting of these high-threat assets, focusing on disrupting their operations. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, SIGINT, ELINT)
  4. EXPLOIT: Continue to leverage Russian internal issues (e.g., non-payment to mobilized personnel) in psychological operations (PSYOPs). Disseminate verified information to highlight systemic failures and undermine Russian troop morale and public support for the war. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, HUMINT)

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Maintain highest air defense alert levels for all major urban centers, especially Kharkiv, Odesa, and Sumy, given the sustained and massed aerial attacks. Prioritize mobile AD groups to cover high-risk areas and protect critical infrastructure.
  2. URGENT: Expedite the deployment and training of mobile AD groups to counter the persistent threat of massed UAV and KAB attacks, particularly in frontline and border oblasts.
  3. FORCE PROTECTION: Enhance passive defenses (dispersal, hardening, camouflage) for military assets and critical civilian infrastructure, particularly in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, in anticipation of potential escalation of Russian ground or air activity. Develop specific TTPs for protecting civilian structures from FPV strikes.
  4. TACTICAL ADAPTATION: Integrate lessons learned from the successful shooting down of 176 UAVs by Ukrainian units into broader AD TTPs and training. Share best practices for countering specific drone types and swarm attacks.

• Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Strengthen defensive postures and contingency plans on the Dnipropetrovsk administrative border and the Sumy axis. Conduct aggressive reconnaissance-in-force to clarify Russian intent and force composition, but avoid committing strategic reserves until the scale of the threat is definitively established.
  2. ONGOING: Maintain robust defensive posture and attritional tactics on the Donetsk axis (Dzerzhinsk, Kurakhove, Pokrovsk). Prioritize counter-battery fire and anti-drone measures (EW, nets, small arms) to mitigate Russian FPV and artillery effectiveness.
  3. TACTICAL ADAPTATION: Continue to integrate and resource Ukrainian drone units for precision strike operations against Russian logistics and frontline equipment (e.g., Kurakhove direction), ensuring sufficient ISR and FPV drone supplies.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Vigorously publicize the confirmed FPV drone strike on a civilian house in Zaporizhzhia and the continued civilian casualties in Kharkiv. Utilize this evidence to condemn Russian terror tactics and underscore the urgent need for more international aid, particularly AD.
  2. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Proactively and rapidly debunk Russian disinformation campaigns, specifically the fabricated Marco Rubio statement, providing clear, factual counter-narratives. Highlight the malicious intent behind such fabrications.
  3. COUNTER-IO: Counter Russian narratives of military superiority by consistently publicizing Ukrainian AD successes (e.g., 176 UAVs shot down) and successful deep strikes against Russian logistics and military equipment.
  4. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: Emphasize the resilience and dedication of Ukrainian border guards and other security forces (e.g., Vadym Boichenko's story) to bolster national morale and counter Russian attempts to sow fear.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. CRITICAL: Leverage all diplomatic channels to highlight the escalating attacks on Ukrainian civilian populations (Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia) and reiterate urgent requests for comprehensive air defense systems and interceptors.
  2. INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION: Ensure seamless information flow between military intelligence, regional civil-military administrations, law enforcement, and emergency services to facilitate rapid, coordinated response and accurate public communication regarding attacks and terror plots.
  3. INTERNATIONAL ENGAGEMENT: Brief international partners on the evolving Russian ground threat on new axes (Dnipropetrovsk, Sumy) and the implications for the overall conflict, to ensure continued and appropriate military aid.
  4. LEGAL ACTION: Compile evidence of FPV drone strikes on civilian targets (Zaporizhzhia) to support international legal proceedings against Russian officials for war crimes.

---