Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR)

TIME OF REPORT: 12 JUN 25 / 03:11 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 12 JUN 25 / 02:41 ZULU - 12 JUN 25 / 03:11 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Eastern Ukraine (Kharkiv Oblast):
  • No new direct kinetic activity confirmed in Kharkiv since the previous reporting period. Air raid alerts remain rescinded. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Southern Ukraine (Zaporizhzhia Oblast):
  • NEW: Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration issued an "ATTENTION" alert (🚨УВАГА🚨). This typically indicates an incoming threat, such as an air raid or artillery/missile strike, or a significant incident requiring public awareness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • ANALYSIS: This alert strongly suggests an imminent or ongoing threat to Zaporizhzhia Oblast, likely a Russian air strike or missile attack, consistent with previous patterns of Russian long-range fires on Ukrainian urban centers. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Northeastern Ukraine (Sumy Oblast):
  • NEW: Russian sources (Colonelcassad) released video footage claiming "Battles in Sumy region: destruction of enemy artillery." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for source reporting, LOW for veracity of claim without corroboration)
  • ANALYSIS: This indicates continued Russian focus on the Sumy axis, consistent with previous assessments of shaping operations. The claim of artillery destruction aligns with Russian efforts to degrade Ukrainian fire support. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Central Russia (Krasnoyarsk Krai):
  • NEW: Inter-municipal state of emergency declared in Krasnoyarsk Krai due to a fuel spill on the Yenisei River. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • ANALYSIS: This is an internal Russian environmental incident, not directly related to military operations, but could reflect wider infrastructure vulnerabilities or a distraction for Russian domestic media. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No specific new weather updates within the reporting period. The fuel spill in Krasnoyarsk Krai is an environmental factor of note but does not directly affect combat operations in Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: LOW)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Civilian Authorities: Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Administration issued an alert, indicating vigilance and rapid communication of threats to the populace. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces:
  • Information Operations: TASS released a video message featuring "Hero of Russia" Rustam Saifullin wishing for a quick victory. This is a clear propaganda effort. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Propaganda Channels: Colonelcassad continues to disseminate battlefield claims and videos, focusing on areas of Russian military interest (e.g., Sumy). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action (COA):

• Capabilities:
  • Aerial Strike Capability: Russia retains the capability for multi-vector aerial strikes against Ukrainian urban centers, as evidenced by the Zaporizhzhia alert. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Artillery Targeting: Claims of artillery destruction in Sumy Oblast suggest continued Russian efforts to identify and target Ukrainian fire support assets. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Information Warfare: Russia demonstrates strong capabilities in producing and disseminating propaganda, including leveraging military figures for morale boosting. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Maintain Pressure on Ukraine: The Zaporizhzhia alert indicates Russia's continued intent to inflict damage and civilian casualties across Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Degrade Ukrainian Combat Power: The claim of artillery destruction in Sumy aligns with the intent to reduce Ukrainian defensive capabilities on a potential new axis. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Boost Domestic Morale & Justify Operations: The propaganda piece featuring Saifullin aims to rally domestic support and frame the conflict in a positive light for the Russian populace. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Shape Information Environment regarding Sumy: The release of combat footage/claims regarding Sumy is intended to project Russian success and pressure Ukrainian forces on this axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• No significant tactical changes confirmed in this reporting period. The continuous targeting of urban centers (Kharkiv, now likely Zaporizhzhia) and persistent focus on the Sumy axis indicate a sustained strategy. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• The continued aerial operations and ground activity suggest Russia's logistics and sustainment remain sufficient for current operational tempos. The internal fuel spill in Krasnoyarsk is a domestic issue and does not immediately indicate combat-related logistical distress. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Appears effective in coordinating ongoing aerial threats and maintaining a consistent information operations narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian C2: Demonstrated rapid communication of threats to the civilian population in Zaporizhzhia. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Maintained readiness, as evidenced by the rapid public alert from Zaporizhzhia authorities. Requires continued vigilance given the high probability of ongoing Russian aerial threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Overall: Remains on high alert, reacting to ongoing Russian aggression across multiple domains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Setbacks/Challenges: The new threat alert for Zaporizhzhia highlights the persistent challenge of defending against Russian aerial attacks across multiple fronts, necessitating widespread AD coverage. The Russian claim of artillery destruction in Sumy, if true, would represent a localized setback. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• The widespread nature of Russian aerial threats (Kharkiv, now Zaporizhzhia) continues to strain AD resources and necessitates sustained supply of interceptors and systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Domestic Morale Boost: The video message from "Hero of Russia" Rustam Saifullin is a direct effort to boost domestic morale and reinforce narratives of military heroism and eventual victory. This is classic internal propaganda. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Justification/Success Projection: Colonelcassad's video claiming destruction of Ukrainian artillery in Sumy is an attempt to project Russian military success and justify ongoing operations on that axis. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Diversion/Normalization: Reporting on the Krasnoyarsk fuel spill (and previous fraud reports) serves to highlight "normal" domestic issues, potentially diverting attention from the war or showing the state addressing internal problems. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Transparency & Threat Communication: The rapid public alert from Zaporizhzhia is a key counter-narrative, demonstrating transparency and commitment to civilian protection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Repeated alerts and strikes on urban centers (Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia) will continue to test civilian morale, but the rapid, transparent communication by authorities helps maintain trust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Morale: Propaganda featuring military heroes aims to bolster domestic morale and reinforce support for the war. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• No direct updates in this specific period. The continued widespread attacks reinforce the need for robust international support for AD capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Continued Massed Aerial Strikes (Next 3-6 hours): Russia will likely conduct multi-wave aerial attacks on Zaporizhzhia and potentially other Ukrainian cities, following the pattern observed in Kharkiv. These strikes will likely use UAVs and potentially missiles to exhaust AD and inflict casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Sustained Shaping Operations on Sumy Axis: Russia will continue KAB strikes and localized ground probes on the Sumy axis, attempting to fix Ukrainian forces and degrade defenses. This will be accompanied by information operations projecting Russian gains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intensified Domestic Propaganda: Russia will likely increase the volume and visibility of propaganda featuring military figures and narratives of victory/heroism to counter any negative sentiments arising from internal issues or Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Multi-Front Ground Offensive (Sumy/Dnipropetrovsk Coordinated with Deep Strikes): Russia could attempt to launch a coordinated, large-scale ground offensive from the Sumy axis, potentially simultaneous with a significant push into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. This would be prefaced or accompanied by a massed missile/drone strike against AD nodes and logistics hubs, creating multi-domain pressure designed to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Targeting of Civilian Emergency Services: Following the deliberate targeting of demining teams in Kharkiv, Russia could escalate attacks on other civilian emergency services (e.g., firefighters, medics responding to strikes) to compound psychological effects and hinder recovery efforts. (CONFIDENCE: LOW-MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 1-3 hours):
  • Anticipate kinetic impacts in Zaporizhzhia Oblast following the alert. Decision Point: Maintain highest AD readiness, conduct rapid BDA, and provide immediate civilian support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Short Term (Next 6-12 hours):
  • Monitor the Sumy axis for any escalation of ground activity beyond probing attacks. Decision Point: Ready local reserves to reinforce positions if indicators of a larger offensive emerge. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Monitor Russian domestic media for further details on the Krasnoyarsk fuel spill to assess its broader impact on Russian infrastructure or state control narratives. Decision Point: Evaluate potential for exploitation in IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Intensify real-time ISR on Zaporizhzhia Oblast. Focus on identifying inbound aerial threats (UAVs, missiles), their launch locations, and potential target sets within the region. (Collection Requirement: SIGINT, ELINT, IMINT)
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Corroborate Russian claims of Ukrainian artillery destruction in Sumy Oblast. Use IMINT and HUMINT to verify the extent of damage and assess the tactical implications. (Collection Requirement: IMINT, BDA, HUMINT)
  3. HIGH PRIORITY: Monitor Russian information channels (TASS, milbloggers) for new propaganda narratives or attempts to shape perceptions of ongoing operations. This includes analysis of video messages from military figures like Saifullin. (Collection Requirement: OSINT, HUMINT)

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Maintain highest AD alert for Zaporizhzhia and surrounding regions. Prioritize AD assets for critical infrastructure, particularly energy and administrative centers, and civilian population areas. Prepare for potential follow-on waves.
  2. URGENT: Re-emphasize dispersal and hardening measures for all units and critical assets, particularly in exposed forward areas. Given Russian claims of artillery destruction in Sumy, active and passive protection for artillery batteries must be prioritized.
  3. URGENT: Continue to advocate for accelerated delivery of additional AD interceptors and ground-based short-range air defense systems to bolster defenses across multiple threatened urban centers.

• Ground Forces:

  1. ONGOING: Maintain reinforced defensive posture on the Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk axes. Continue to execute reconnaissance-in-force, develop counter-attack plans, and ensure readiness of tactical reserves to respond to any escalation.
  2. TACTICAL ADAPTATION: Review and update counter-battery fire procedures and TTPs in response to Russian claims of successful artillery targeting. Emphasize fire-and-move tactics, camouflage, and active EW protection for artillery systems.
  3. FORCE PROTECTION: Prioritize personal and unit protection against drones and loitering munitions, especially for forward artillery crews. Integrate anti-drone teams and electronic warfare assets.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Publicize accurate, real-time updates on the situation in Zaporizhzhia to counter Russian attempts to sow panic. Emphasize the resilience of Ukrainian civil defense and the effectiveness of AD where applicable.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Counter Russian propaganda narratives (e.g., Saifullin video, Sumy artillery claims) with verified facts and evidence of Russian atrocities. Highlight the indiscriminate nature of Russian attacks on civilians.
  3. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: Leverage the Krasnoyarsk fuel spill as an example of Russian internal mismanagement or infrastructure vulnerability, contrasting it with Ukraine's resilience. (Decision Point: Assess timing and impact before deployment).

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. CRITICAL: Immediately brief international partners on the renewed targeting of civilian populations in Zaporizhzhia and the persistent threat to multiple urban centers. Use this information to press for urgent delivery of AD systems.
  2. INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION: Ensure seamless communication and information sharing between military intelligence, regional civil-military administrations, and emergency services to facilitate rapid response and accurate public communication during ongoing threats.

---