Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 11 JUN 25 / 23:41 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 11 JUN 25 / 23:11 ZULU - 11 JUN 25 / 23:41 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Eastern Ukraine (Kharkiv Oblast):
  • UPDATE: Continued Russian Shahed UAV attacks on Kharkiv, with previous reporting confirming a hit in Шевченківський District. Ukrainian Air Force issuing renewed warnings regarding active drone movement. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • NO CHANGE: Russian milblogger claims of a "fire bag" around Radkivka remain uncorroborated by independent intelligence. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for "fire bag" formation, HIGH for Russian narrative persistence).
• Central Russia (Moscow Region):
  • NO CHANGE: Rosaviatsiya confirmation of temporary suspension of operations at Vnukovo and Sheremetyevo airports due to Ukrainian deep strikes holds. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Global Context:
  • NO CHANGE: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's congratulatory message to Russia on "Russia Day" continues to underscore strengthening geopolitical alignment. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• No new significant weather or environmental factors reported for the current reporting period. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces:
  • Air Defense: Actively engaged in defense of Kharkiv and other regions. Air Force of Ukraine continues to provide timely public warnings regarding drone threats, indicating sustained AD posture and effective C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces:
  • Aerial Attack Posture: Continued employment of Shahed UAVs against Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, remains a primary method of attrition and psychological pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Operations: Continued high tempo of narrative shaping, attempting to project local operational success and leverage international relations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Long-Range UAV Strikes: Russia maintains a demonstrated capability for persistent Shahed UAV attacks on major urban centers. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Warfare: Highly integrated and adaptive, capable of immediate narrative spin and leveraging international partners for strategic messaging. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Ukrainian AD/Infrastructure & Punish Civilians: Russia's primary intention with continued Shahed UAV attacks is to exhaust Ukrainian AD, strike critical infrastructure, and inflict psychological pressure on civilian populations. This is evident in the sustained targeting of Kharkiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Project Offensive Success & Threaten Encirclement: The "fire bag" claim around Radkivka aims to demoralize Ukrainian forces and civilian population, imply successful Russian tactical maneuvers, and possibly signal a precursor to further ground operations in Kharkiv Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Influence US-Russia Relations & Global Perception: TASS reporting on Дарчиев's statement about US-Russia direct aviation links (and previous comments on dialogue) indicates a Russian intention to project an image of diplomatic openness and potentially test Western resolve, even while maintaining aggression. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Exploit Global Geopolitical Events: The PENTAGON's concern regarding the Middle East and withdrawal of US military families is a significant development that Russia will likely attempt to exploit in its information campaigns to draw US attention and resources away from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Targeting Patterns: Continued targeting of civilian areas within Kharkiv demonstrates a deliberate intent to inflict civilian casualties and psychological impact, consistent with previous patterns. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Propaganda Focus: Immediate propagation of claims like the "fire bag" at Radkivka indicates a rapid response and emphasis on portraying local tactical gains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Continued Shahed UAV attacks indicate sustained production/acquisition and logistical support for these systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: Continues to effectively coordinate massed aerial attacks and a multi-faceted information operations campaign. Rapid dissemination of propaganda suggests effective C2 over media assets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian C2: Continues to effectively track and report aerial threats, indicating robust C2 for Air Defense and public warning systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: High readiness, actively defending against ongoing Shahed attacks and issuing public warnings. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Strategic UAV Operations: Sustained offensive deep strike capabilities continue to disrupt Russian civilian infrastructure (Moscow airports) and military-industrial targets (Tambov Gunpowder Plant). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Continued effectiveness of deep strikes in disrupting Russian civilian aviation infrastructure and degrading military-industrial capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • AD systems continue to engage and neutralize Shahed UAVs, mitigating broader damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks/Challenges:
  • Persistent UAV threats from Russia continue to cause civilian casualties and damage, even with AD efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Managing the psychological impact of aggressive Russian information operations remains a challenge. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: Continuous expenditure of AD interceptors against persistent drone threats remains a critical constraint. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• ISR/Counter-UAV: Continued need for advanced ISR to predict and counter adaptive UAV routing, and for counter-UAV systems. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Narratives:
  • Resumption of Direct Air Travel with US: TASS reporting on Дарчиев's statement about business interest in resuming direct flights between Russia and the US is a soft-power diplomatic initiative. It aims to project Russian "normalcy" and desire for engagement, potentially to sow discord among Western allies or test the limits of Western isolation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Exploitation of Middle East Tensions: Colonelcassad's immediate reporting on Pentagon's authorization for US military family departure from the Middle East highlights Russia's intent to amplify global instability, portraying the US as overstretched and potentially diverting focus from Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Biological Threats: Roskomnadzor's report on "single cases" of monkeypox in Russia could be a pre-emptive measure or a low-level biological scare tactic, though its direct application to the conflict is not immediately apparent. (CONFIDENCE: LOW for direct conflict relevance, HIGH for factual reporting).
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives:
  • Transparency & Resilience: Ukrainian Air Force updates and РБК-Україна's immediate relay of information regarding drone movement maintain public trust and highlight ongoing threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale: Repeated attacks on civilian areas continue to test morale, but transparent communication from authorities helps manage the psychological impact. Russian claims of "fire bags" are intended to sow fear but are unlikely to succeed without concrete battlefield developments. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Morale: Propaganda depicting diplomatic "openness" and amplifying US global struggles aims to boost domestic morale and reinforce the narrative of Russia's strategic position. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• US-Russia Dialogue: Дарчиев's comment on direct aviation links, while seemingly benign, is part of a broader Russian effort to test the waters for re-engagement and to normalize relations. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Middle East Instability: The US Pentagon's decision to authorize family departures from the Middle East signals escalating regional tensions, which Russia will undoubtedly attempt to leverage. This could influence Western resource allocation and strategic focus. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Sustained, Adaptive Massed Aerial Attacks on Urban Centers: Russia will continue to launch massed Shahed UAV attacks against major Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, adapting routes and timings to bypass AD and achieve maximum psychological impact and inflict damage, including civilian infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intensified IO on Tactical Gains and Global Distractions: Russia will accelerate its information operations, emphasizing claims of local tactical successes (e.g., "fire bag" around Radkivka), aggressively portraying the destruction of Western-supplied equipment, and heavily amplifying global instability (e.g., Middle East tensions) to divert Western attention and resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Continued Ground Attrition and Probing: Russian ground forces will maintain high-tempo attritional assaults on the Donetsk axis and continue probing attacks on the Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk borders, while leveraging propaganda to amplify any perceived tactical gains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Rapid Ground Offensive on New Axis (Kharkiv/Sumy): The "fire bag" claim on Radkivka, combined with Putin's recent directive to boost ground forces, suggests an MDCOA involving a rapid transition from shaping operations to a coordinated, multi-pronged ground offensive in Kharkiv Oblast (potentially threatening a push towards the city or deeper into the region) or a renewed large-scale push on the Sumy axis. This could be accompanied by massed UAV/missile strikes to degrade AD and C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Exploitation of Middle East Tensions for Strategic Deception: Russia could use the escalating Middle East tensions as a strategic cover to launch a major, unexpected offensive on a new axis in Ukraine (e.g., Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk border) while Western attention is diverted. This would be coupled with a rapid, overwhelming information operation. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Immediate (Next 3-6 hours):
  • Monitor the unfolding Shahed attack on Kharkiv and assess BDA. Decision Point: Direct AD assets for interception, initiate damage assessment and civilian support operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Monitor Russian media for further amplification of the "Radkivka fire bag" claim and any associated force movements. Decision Point: Prepare immediate counter-propaganda and assess ground force readiness in the area. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Short Term (Next 12-24 hours):
  • Analyze any new information regarding Russian attempts to leverage Middle East tensions or diplomatic overtures for direct aviation links. Decision Point: Prepare diplomatic and IO responses to counter Russian narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Medium Term (Next 24-48 hours):
  • Intensify ISR on the Kharkiv front (Radkivka area), Sumy axis, and Dnipropetrovsk border for signs of Russian ground force accumulation or preparatory moves consistent with a larger offensive. Decision Point: Begin pre-positioning reserves, intelligence, and engineer assets if confirmed. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Intelligence & Special Operations (ISR is paramount):

  1. CRITICAL PRIORITY: Immediately and significantly increase ISR collection efforts on the Kharkiv front, specifically around Radkivka, the Sumy axis, and the Dnipropetrovsk border. Determine if the "fire bag" claim is supported by actual force movements or is purely an information operation. Focus on force accumulation, logistical buildup, and C2 activity. (Collection Requirement: Enhanced IMINT, SIGINT, HUMINT on all potential invasion axes).
  2. HIGH PRIORITY: Rapidly analyze Russian information operations regarding the Middle East. Identify how Russia is attempting to leverage these tensions to its advantage in Ukraine and prepare counter-narratives. (Collection Requirement: OSINT on Russian state media and milbloggers regarding ME and US foreign policy).
  3. URGENT: Continue and expand the deep strike campaign against high-value Russian military-industrial targets and critical civilian infrastructure that directly supports the war effort. Prioritize targets that inflict significant economic and logistical costs. (Collection Requirement: BDA on critical infrastructure targets).
  4. CYBER/OSINT: Actively monitor and analyze Russian information channels (e.g., Colonelcassad, TASS) for further propaganda depicting diplomatic "openness" or attempts to exploit global crises. Rapidly identify and fact-check such content.

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Maintain highest AD alert for Kharkiv and all major urban centers, adapting AD asset deployment to counter evolving Shahed routes and massed attack patterns. Prioritize defense of civilian populations and critical infrastructure.
  2. FORCE PROTECTION: Reiterate and enforce enhanced force protection measures for all personnel and critical infrastructure in areas susceptible to long-range UAV/missile strikes.

• Ground Forces:

  1. URGENT: Enhance defensive posture and readiness of units on the Kharkiv front (especially around Radkivka), Sumy axis, and Dnipropetrovsk border immediately. This includes strengthening defensive lines, deploying additional anti-tank and anti-drone capabilities, and preparing for rapid response to potential large-scale ground assaults. DO NOT COMMIT STRATEGIC RESERVES without clear, confirmed intelligence of major offensive.
  2. RECONNAISSANCE-IN-FORCE: Conduct limited, aggressive reconnaissance-in-force missions in high-risk areas (e.g., Radkivka, Yunakivka, Dnipropetrovsk border) to probe Russian forward positions and definitively ascertain their intent and force composition.

• Information Operations (IO):

  1. CRITICAL/IMMEDIATE: Aggressively counter the "Radkivka fire bag" and similar maximalist tactical claims. Highlight their psychological warfare intent, reiterate the stability of Ukrainian defenses, and provide factual updates from the front.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Proactively expose and condemn Russian attacks on civilian targets, including schools, in Kharkiv and other cities. Emphasize Russia's deliberate targeting of civilians and humanitarian consequences, leveraging international legal bodies.
  3. CRITICAL: Counter Russian narratives of diplomatic openness and "normalcy" (e.g., direct flights to US). Emphasize that such discussions are a distraction from ongoing aggression and war crimes.
  4. STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION: Highlight Russia's attempts to exploit global instability (e.g., Middle East tensions) to divert Western attention and resources. Frame this as a cynical tactic demonstrating Russia's opportunistic nature and its commitment to global destabilization.
  5. PUBLIC INFORMATION: Ensure timely and transparent updates on AD operations and UAV threats to maintain public trust and prevent panic, while also emphasizing the ongoing threat and the need for vigilance.

• Diplomatic/Inter-Agency:

  1. CRITICAL: Monitor US-Russia diplomatic overtures (as hinted by Дарчиев) carefully. Ensure that any dialogue does not undermine international support for Ukraine or legitimize Russian aggression.
  2. CRITICAL: Brief international partners on Russia's likely exploitation of Middle East tensions. Emphasize the need for sustained and unwavering support for Ukraine despite other global events.
  3. ONGOING: Maintain diplomatic pressure on Russia regarding its human rights abuses and its systematic targeting of civilian populations.
  4. INTER-AGENCY COORDINATION: Ensure seamless coordination between military intelligence, Air Force, ground forces, and diplomatic channels for real-time information sharing regarding evolving threats on new axes, any associated IO efforts, and the implications of geopolitical alignments.

---