Situation Report

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 10 JUN 25 / 06:07 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 10 JUN 25 / 05:37 ZULU - 10 JUN 25 / 06:07 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET / ORCON / NOFORN

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• Kyiv: Confirmed widespread damage from night attacks, with new visual intelligence (РБК-Україна, 05:40:33 ZULU) showing significant damage to a multi-story building in Obolon district and a burning car service station (РБК-Україна, 05:44:23 ZULU). Russian sources (WarGonzo, Два майора, 05:45:06 ZULU; 05:52:49 ZULU) are actively disseminating imagery of fires and smoke in Kyiv, explicitly attributing them to "Geranium" (Shahed) UAVs. The Ukrainian Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA) reports 19 fires, with 4 still active (РБК-Україна, 06:05:44 ZULU), indicating a broad impact. One video shows an individual precariously navigating a collapsed building in Kyiv, resulting in further debris fall (Alex Parker Returns, 05:47:34 ZULU), highlighting structural instability and ongoing danger. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Odesa Oblast: Confirmed damage to a residential building and civilian vehicles from UAV attack. DSNS of Odesa Oblast is actively engaged in firefighting and consequence management (РБК-Україна, 06:05:45 ZULU). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Kharkiv Oblast: Governor Syniehubov reports 8 settlements were subjected to enemy strikes over the past day (Олег Синєгубов, 05:38:18 ZULU), indicating continued localized pressure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka Directions): Russian sources (Kotsnews, 05:46:34 ZULU) continue to claim activity on the Novopavlivka direction, supported by a map. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) Russian sources also claim an ODAB-1500 airstrike by a Su-34 on a temporary deployment point of the 114th Territorial Defense Brigade near Kupiansk (Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition, 05:57:24 ZULU; ТАСС, 05:59:58 ZULU), implying successful deep strikes against Ukrainian positions. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM) Russian sources (Colonelcassad, 06:02:01 ZULU) are actively propagandizing the "liberation" of Kotlyarovka, claiming breach of a tank ditch and berm with ladders. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for claims of liberation, LOW for BDA). Russian milblogger "Воин DV" (06:00:05 ZULU) claims destruction of a Ukrainian BMP by FPV drones on the Shakhtarsk direction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Sumy Oblast: Ukrainian Air Force warns of continued threat of attack UAVs in Sumy Oblast (Повітряні Сили ЗС України, 05:41:05 ZULU). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Kursk Oblast (RU): Russian Z-milbloggers published video showing a "Kadyrovite" from "Akhmat" battalion firing a grenade launcher at a residential building in Sudzha. Ukrainian sources (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС, 06:03:29 ZULU) confirm the incident and link it to Russian internal security issues, with the perpetrator reportedly dying in a traffic accident while fleeing police. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for incident, MEDIUM for reported death/circumstances).
• Dnipropetrovsk Oblast: Russian sources (ТАСС, 05:44:21 ZULU) claim to have taken "fire control" of the Krasnoarmeysk – Pavlohrad highway, limiting Ukrainian logistics. This is a significant claim that requires independent verification. (CONFIDENCE: LOW)
• Yakutia (RU): Rosaviatsia is searching for an An-2 aircraft with five personnel that issued a distress signal (ТАСС, 05:47:01 ZULU). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) - [ANALYST NOTE: Unrelated to conflict, but notable Russian internal incident.]

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Ongoing fires and heavy smoke continue to impact air quality and visibility in Kyiv, complicating emergency response and potentially degrading sensor performance for both sides. The large number of fires (19) suggests significant environmental impact. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Spring/early summer vegetation observed in Russian propaganda videos (Colonelcassad, 06:02:02 ZULU) implies increased natural cover for ground operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): Actively engaged, but the MIA report of 19 fires confirms a significant number of penetrations by Russian aerial assets. A Ukrainian milblogger (STERNENKO, 05:43:42 ZULU) expresses concern about the lack of FPV drone operator training for mobile fire groups, indicating a potential capability gap against low-flying threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground): Forces in Kharkiv Oblast continue to face enemy strikes. The potential logistical impact of Russian claims on the Krasnoarmeysk-Pavlohrad highway (if verified) would be significant. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for activity, LOW for impact on logistics).
• Ukrainian Forces (Emergency Services): DSNS and MIA are heavily engaged in Kyiv and Odesa, with confirmation of 19 fires and ongoing efforts to extinguish them (РБК-Україна, 06:05:44 ZULU). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Personnel Management): Ukrainian DSHV (Air Assault Forces) released video/photos of service members returning from Russian captivity undergoing rehabilitation and adaptation, a positive morale and HR development. (Десантно-штурмові війська ЗС України, 05:43:57 ZULU). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Air): Continued use of UAVs and likely missiles for deep strikes. Claims of ODAB-1500 (thermobaric) aerial bomb usage by Su-34s near Kupiansk indicate continued close air support and deep strike capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for capability).
• Russian Forces (Ground): Continued offensive pressure in Donetsk Oblast. Claims of breaching a tank ditch and berm in Kotlyarovka (35th Separate Guards Motorized Rifle Brigade) and using motorcycles for assault (83rd Separate Guards Air Assault Brigade) suggest continued adaptation of assault tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for ongoing ground pressure and adaptation).
• Russian Forces (Internal Security): The incident in Sudzha involving a "Kadyrovite" Military Police serviceman firing a grenade launcher at a residential building, and then reportedly dying while fleeing police, highlights significant internal discipline and control issues within Russian forces operating in border regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Aerial Attack: Russia maintains high-volume aerial attack capabilities, successfully penetrating Ukrainian AD in multiple locations (Kyiv, Odesa) leading to widespread fires and infrastructure damage. The reported use of ODAB-1500 bombs indicates the continued use of powerful, high-yield munitions for ground support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ground Operations: Russia continues to demonstrate offensive capacity, particularly in the Donbas, and is adapting tactics to overcome defenses (e.g., ladder assaults on fortifications, motorcycle infiltration). Persistent use of FPV drones by Russian forces for target destruction (BMP on Shakhtarsk direction) is evident. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Deep Strike Defense: Russian MoD continues to claim successful interceptions of Ukrainian UAVs (102 over the night according to Операция Z, 05:43:01 ZULU). (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM for veracity of numbers).
  • Information Operations (IO): Russia's IO remains sophisticated, immediately leveraging images of Kyiv fires for propaganda, exaggerating AD successes, and promoting fabricated narratives of "liberation" and soldier heroism (WarGonzo, Два майора, Colonelcassad). A key tactic is the "mirroring" of Ukrainian successes (e.g., claiming destruction of large numbers of Ukrainian UAVs after a major Russian attack). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Strategic: Continue to degrade Ukrainian civilian morale and infrastructure through persistent aerial attacks, while simultaneously attempting to achieve tactical breakthroughs on the ground, particularly in Donbas, to advance strategic objectives of territorial control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Operational: Sustain offensive pressure on key axes, exploit any perceived weaknesses in Ukrainian defenses, and attempt to disrupt Ukrainian logistics (e.g., claimed Krasnoarmeysk-Pavlohrad highway control). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Information: Maximize psychological impact of attacks on Ukraine, amplify perceived Russian successes, deflect criticism for civilian casualties by focusing on Ukrainian "provocations" or "military targets," and maintain domestic support for the war by showcasing "heroic" soldiers and "liberated" territories. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Ground Assault Tactics: Russian forces are demonstrating flexibility and audacity in ground assaults, employing ladders to breach fortified positions (Kotlyarovka) and using motorcycles for rapid infiltration (Volnoye Pole). This suggests a shift towards more direct and unconventional methods to overcome prepared defenses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Increased Airstrike Munition Variety: Confirmed use of ODAB-1500 bombs indicates Russia is varying its aerial munitions, potentially to maximize destructive effect against fortified positions or temporary deployment points. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Targeting of Logistics: The claim of fire control over Krasnoarmeysk-Pavlohrad highway suggests an active attempt to disrupt Ukrainian logistical lines, a critical operational focus. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM, pending verification).
• Internal Security Issues: The Sudzha incident highlights growing internal discipline problems among Russian forces, potentially impacting unit cohesion and reliability, especially in border regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Munitions: The continued high volume of aerial attacks and ground-based fires (including ODAB-1500 and FPV drones) demonstrates Russia's ability to sustain significant ammunition and munition expenditure. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Personnel: Russian propaganda is actively promoting contract service, drawing from various segments of society, including former prisoners (Colonelcassad, 06:02:02 ZULU), indicating ongoing efforts to replenish manpower. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Integrated Operations: The synchronization of large-scale aerial attacks with immediate IO dissemination (e.g., WarGonzo's rapid release of Kyiv fire images) indicates effective, centralized C2 for kinetic and information operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Decentralized Problem Solving: The use of small-unit tactics like ladders for breaching tank ditches suggests some level of tactical initiative at lower echelons, likely supported by overall operational directives. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Internal Discipline Lapses: The Sudzha incident points to significant C2 failures regarding discipline and conduct of forces, especially in non-combat zones. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Ukrainian AD remains active, but the 19 reported fires indicate a persistent challenge against saturation attacks and the need for continued adaptation and resupply of interceptors. The concern about FPV drone operator training for mobile fire groups points to a known vulnerability that needs urgent addressing. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ground Forces: Maintaining defensive posture in Kharkiv Oblast. The reports of 174 combat clashes (from previous ISR) highlight continued high-intensity engagements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Services & Law Enforcement: Highly professional and effective in consequence management. The prompt reporting by MIA of 19 fires and ongoing efforts (РБК-Україна, 06:05:44 ZULU) demonstrates transparency and efficient response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Personnel Readiness: The successful rehabilitation and adaptation of returning POWs (Десантно-штурмові війська ЗС України, 05:43:57 ZULU) is a significant positive for morale and force reconstitution. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Deep Strike Capability: Ukrainian deep strike capabilities continue to force Russia to maintain AD posture over its territory, as evidenced by exaggerated Russian claims of large numbers of UAV interceptions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for capability).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Effective Consequence Management: Ukrainian emergency services are effectively managing the aftermath of widespread strikes, demonstrating resilience and professionalism.
  • Successful POW Exchange: The rehabilitation of returning POWs boosts morale and demonstrates commitment to personnel.
  • Continued Deep Strike Pressure: Ukraine maintains the ability to launch deep strikes into Russian territory, diverting Russian AD resources.
• Setbacks:
  • Significant Civilian Damage/Casualties: The scale of fires and damage in Kyiv and Odesa, coupled with casualties, represents a direct impact of Russian aerial attacks.
  • Persistent AD Penetrations: Despite AD efforts, a significant number of Russian aerial assets are reaching their targets, causing widespread destruction.
  • Ground Pressure in Donbas: Russian forces continue to apply intense pressure and are demonstrating new tactical adaptations in ground assaults, requiring constant vigilance and counter-measures.
  • Potential Logistical Threat: The unverified Russian claim regarding Krasnoarmeysk-Pavlohrad highway highlights a potential new area of concern for Ukrainian logistics.

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: Continued high expenditure of AD munitions against massed attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• FPV Drone Operators: Urgent need for accelerated training and deployment of FPV drone operators within mobile fire groups to enhance low-altitude air defense and improve ground reconnaissance/strike capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Response Resources: Sustained demand for firefighting equipment, medical supplies, and humanitarian aid due to widespread civilian infrastructure damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• ISR Assets: Critical need for independent verification of Russian claims, particularly regarding the Krasnoarmeysk-Pavlohrad highway and the claimed "liberation" of Kotlyarovka. Real-time BDA on Russian airstrikes is also needed. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Counter-IO Capabilities: An immediate and robust counter-IO response is required to refute Russian claims of ground advances and successful strikes, and to counter their dehumanizing narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Exaggeration/Fabrication: Russian milbloggers (Операция Z, WarGonzo, Два майора, Colonelcassad, Поддубный |Z|О|V| edition, Воин DV) are highly active in disseminating information that:
  • Exaggerates Ukrainian UAV interceptions (102 claimed by MoD).
  • Immediately attributes Kyiv fires to Ukrainian AD or "Geranium" drones (WarGonzo, Два майора).
  • Claims significant ground advances and "liberation" of settlements (Kotlyarovka, Volnoye Pole) with staged or heavily edited video evidence (Colonelcassad).
  • Promotes "heroic" narratives of Russian soldiers, including those with criminal backgrounds (Colonelcassad), to boost recruitment and morale.
  • Fabricates Western domestic crises (e.g., Marine deployment to LA riots - ASTRA, 05:54:42 ZULU), designed to divert international attention from Ukraine and sow distrust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Counter-Narratives: Ukrainian channels (РБК-Україна, Олег Синєгубов, Десантно-штурмові війська ЗС України, Запорізька обласна військова адміністрація, Оперативний ЗСУ, БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС) are focusing on:
  • Documenting civilian casualties and damage from Russian strikes with verifiable imagery (РБК-Україна, Офіс Генерального прокурора).
  • Reporting transparently on emergency response efforts (MIA report of 19 fires).
  • Showcasing positive developments for friendly forces (POW rehabilitation, minute of silence for fallen).
  • Highlighting internal Russian discipline issues (Sudzha incident). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Ukrainian Morale:
  • Resilience under Attack: The repeated mass attacks on cities like Kyiv and Odesa will test morale but are being met with organized emergency responses and public defiance, reinforcing resolve.
  • Importance of Transparency: Ukrainian government and media are providing timely, factual updates, which is crucial for maintaining public trust amidst Russian disinformation.
  • Boost from POW Returns: The return and rehabilitation of POWs is a significant morale boost for both military personnel and the general public.
• Russian Morale:
  • Reinforced Nationalist Narrative: Propaganda portraying "heroes," battlefield successes, and "liberated" territories is designed to bolster domestic support and frontline morale.
  • Internal Divisions/Discipline: Incidents like the one in Sudzha, if widely known internally, could expose cracks in discipline and contradict narratives of a disciplined force.
  • Dehumanization of Enemy: Consistent dehumanization of Ukrainian forces ("freaks") aims to justify aggression and reduce empathy.

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• Condemnation of Civilian Targeting: The continued targeting of civilian infrastructure and resulting casualties in Kyiv and Odesa will likely draw strong international condemnation and renewed calls for increased military aid to Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Awareness of Russian Hybrid Warfare: The fabricated US domestic crisis narrative (ASTRA, 05:54:42 ZULU) serves as a stark reminder of Russia's aggressive and deceptive information warfare tactics, which should reinforce international support for Ukraine's counter-IO efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Focus on Russian Internal Issues: The Sudzha incident provides a unique lens into the internal stability and discipline of Russian forces, which could inform international policy and sanctions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• Continued Multi-Vector Aerial Attacks: Russia will continue using massed drones and precision-guided missiles to target urban centers, civilian infrastructure, and energy facilities, aiming to exhaust AD, inflict casualties, and disrupt the Ukrainian economy. Expect follow-on waves, potentially at reduced scale compared to the initial mass attack. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Sustained Attritional Ground Offensives in Donbas: Russian forces will maintain high-tempo ground assaults in Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk, Kostyantynivka, Novopavlivka axes) and potentially on the Shakhtarsk direction, utilizing adapted tactics (e.g., ladder assaults, FPV drones, aerial bombs) to achieve localized gains and fix Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Aggressive Information Operations: Russia will continue to amplify battlefield claims, exaggerate Ukrainian losses, and push narratives of "liberation" and "heroism" to maintain domestic support. Expect increased use of fabricated or manipulated content to discredit Ukraine and Western allies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Increased Internal Security Measures/Crackdown: In response to perceived domestic threats or internal dissent (e.g., ongoing deep strikes, incidents like Sudzha), the Russian regime will likely intensify internal suppression efforts and information control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• Major Offensive on a New Axis (e.g., Sumy/Kharkiv): Following the aerial bombardment and IO efforts, Russia could commit significant reserves to a large-scale ground offensive on a new axis (e.g., deeper into Sumy Oblast, or a renewed push into Kharkiv Oblast to link up with forces near Kupiansk), aiming for a major operational breakthrough or encirclement. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Deliberate Targeting of Ukrainian Emergency Services/Civic Infrastructure: Russia could intentionally target emergency response hubs, hospitals, or critical municipal services (e.g., water, power distribution) to further degrade Ukraine's ability to respond to attacks and create humanitarian crises. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Escalation of Cross-Border Hybrid Operations: Russia could conduct more aggressive hybrid operations from border regions, including sabotage, psychological operations, and localized ground incursions, aimed at creating instability and drawing Ukrainian forces away from the main fronts. The Sudzha incident is a precursor for this. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 2-6 Hours (Immediate Threat): Expect continued Russian aerial attacks, likely lower in volume but persistent. Ukrainian forces must prioritize BDA and immediate consequence management in affected urban areas. Decisions on rapid AD munition resupply remain critical. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 6-24 Hours: Ground combat will remain intense, particularly in Donetsk Oblast. Russian IO will consolidate narratives of success and likely introduce new justifications for their actions. Ukrainian decision points include continuous AD readiness, tactical adjustments to counter Russian ground adaptations, and coordinated counter-IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Next 24-48 Hours: Expect the overall tempo of aerial attacks to potentially decrease but remain a threat. Ground operations will likely continue unabated. Ukrainian decision points will involve strategic resource allocation, including potential shifting of reserves, and refining counter-measures to new Russian ground tactics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

• Air Defense & Force Protection:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Continue to prioritize rapid BDA on all affected areas in Kyiv and Odesa, documenting all damage to civilian infrastructure and casualties for legal and diplomatic purposes.
  2. URGENT: Maintain high AD readiness, particularly for low-altitude drone threats, and ensure adequate anti-drone assets (e.g., mobile fire groups, EW) are deployed and resupplied.
  3. CRITICAL: Accelerate training and deployment of FPV drone operators for mobile fire groups to enhance their effectiveness against Shaheds and other low-flying targets.
  4. URGENT: Provide immediate support to DSNS and MIA in Kyiv and Odesa for ongoing firefighting and consequence management, including specialized equipment and personnel.

• Ground Forces:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Maintain robust defensive postures along all active fronts, especially on the Pokrovsk, Kostyantynivka, and Novopavlivka directions.
  2. URGENT: Monitor Russian force dispositions and intent on the Krasnoarmeysk-Pavlohrad highway with all available ISR to verify claims of "fire control" and prepare for potential logistical disruptions.
  3. ONGOING: Develop and disseminate counter-tactics against Russian innovations in obstacle breaching (e.g., ladder assaults) and rapid infiltration (e.g., motorcycles).
  4. MONITOR: Continuously track Russian claims of advances (e.g., Kotlyarovka, Volnoye Pole) and conduct immediate ISR to verify and assess the actual tactical situation.

• Intelligence & Special Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE/CRITICAL: Task all available ISR assets to definitively confirm or refute Russian claims of ground control over the Krasnoarmeysk-Pavlohrad highway and to assess the true situation in Kotlyarovka and Volnoye Pole.
  2. URGENT: Conduct detailed BDA on the claimed ODAB-1500 strike near Kupiansk to assess munition type, impact, and target function.
  3. ONGOING: Continue deep strike operations against Russian military-industrial complex targets and logistics nodes to degrade their capacity for future large-scale aerial assaults and ground operations. Prioritize targets impacting UAV and precision munition production.
  4. COLLECT: Gather further intelligence on the internal discipline and control issues within Russian forces, particularly the Sudzha incident, to understand broader implications for Russian unit cohesion and reliability.
  5. ANALYZE: Monitor Russian social media and milblogger channels for further tactical innovations and personnel recruitment methods (e.g., ex-convicts) to inform counter-strategy.

• Information Operations:

  1. IMMEDIATE: Launch an aggressive international counter-IO campaign highlighting the confirmed civilian casualties and widespread damage to residential buildings in Kyiv and Odesa, using verifiable photographic and video evidence. Directly refute Russian claims of targeting only military sites.
  2. IMMEDIATE: Forcefully and immediately expose and refute new Russian narratives of "liberation" and "heroism" in areas like Kotlyarovka and Volnoye Pole, emphasizing the destruction and civilian displacement caused by these actions.
  3. IMMEDIATE: Publicize and condemn the incident in Sudzha, highlighting the internal discipline issues within Russian forces and their disregard for civilian life. Frame this as another example of Russian war crimes.
  4. IMMEDIATE: Actively counter Russian disinformation campaigns, especially those involving fabricated events (e.g., US domestic unrest), by immediately debunking false claims with verified facts.
  5. URGENT: Widely publicize the efforts of Ukrainian AD, emergency services, and law enforcement in mitigating damage, saving lives, and documenting war crimes. Emphasize the professionalism and resilience of Ukrainian personnel.
  6. ONGOING: Leverage the return and rehabilitation of POWs as a positive narrative to bolster domestic morale and demonstrate the Ukrainian government's commitment to its defenders.