Situation Report

OPSEC CLASSIFICATION: NATO SECRET // RELEASABLE TO UKR FORCES

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 08 JUN 25 / 20:49 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 08 JUN 25 / 20:19 ZULU - 08 JUN 25 / 20:49 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update: No significant changes to AOR list. Focus remains on Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Zaporizhzhia Oblast, Black Sea, Azov Sea, Sumy Oblast, Russian Federation border regions (Kursk, Bryansk, Belgorod), and the Donetsk axis. Kyiv and Kharkiv remain critical urban targets. Poltava Oblast is now impacted.

• New Developments (UKR):

  • Kyiv Under Shahed Attack: Air Force of the AFU, Kyiv City Military Administration (КМВА), and RBC-Ukraine confirm continued Shahed activity over Kyiv. Air defense is engaged. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - official Ukrainian sources). Nikolaevsky Vanek reports two Shaheds over Ukrainka/Boryspil heading towards Kyiv. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - trusted OSINT source).
  • Kharkiv Under KAB Attack: Oleg Syniehubov, Head of Kharkiv Oblast Military Administration, confirms enemy KAB strike on the outskirts of Kharkiv, resulting in a fire. Tsaplienko also confirms a hit in the Kharkiv suburbs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - official Ukrainian source, visual evidence).
  • Poltava Under Attack: Tsaplienko reports explosions in Poltava Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - trusted OSINT source).

• New Developments (RU):

  • Strategic Bomber Activity: Tsaplienko reports activation of Tu-95MS/Tu-22M3 aircraft at "Engels-2" airfield, followed by confirmed takeoff of Tu-95MS strategic bombers from "Olenya" airfield. This confirms the previously assessed imminent strategic missile threat. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - trusted OSINT source).
  • Kharkiv KAB Claims: "Voenkor Kotonok" claims Russian forces are striking "military objects of the pig Reich" in Kharkiv with FABs equipped with UMPK (KABs). This is standard Russian propaganda framing. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian milblogger).
  • Dnipropetrovsk IO Escalation: Alex Parker Returns publishes a cartoon image, framed as a "tactical analysis," showing Russian soldiers at a "Dnipropetrovska Oblast" sign, claiming Colonel Yevgeny Daraev (commander of the "advancing tank regiment in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast") is nominated for Hero of Russia. This is a significant escalation of the Dnipropetrovsk information operation, attempting to legitimize their false claims with specific (albeit likely fabricated) personnel and awards. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian milblogger, clear IO intent).
  • POW Claim from Mariupol Unit: Colonelcassad shares a video claiming to show Ukrainian POWs captured by "Assault detachment STORM 336 OGvBrMP" (likely 336th Separate Guards Naval Infantry Brigade of the Baltic Fleet) during offensive operations. This suggests continued Russian offensive actions and POW capture attempts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian milblogger, visual evidence of POWs).
  • Western Aid Disinformation: TASS continues to publish content critical of US aid to Ukraine, quoting JD Vance calling military aid "madness" and claiming Biden never "forced" Kyiv to negotiate. This is a continued effort to sow discord among Western allies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian state media).
  • Moscow Metro "Incident" (Likely unrelated): Alex Parker Returns shares photos of an apparent incident in the Moscow metro (individuals on the floor, baby stroller). The caption "Пыпа, итоги" (Pyipa, results – likely referring to Putin) suggests a domestic criticism or commentary on internal issues. Unrelated to military operations in Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian milblogger, domestic content).
  • Russian Air Defense Claims: "NgP разведка" claims "200 reparations in the airspace of the cursed state, the rest are on the way," likely referring to downed Ukrainian UAVs or incoming Russian munitions. This is ambiguous but suggests ongoing air activity and Russian claims of successful intercepts/strikes. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian milblogger, ambiguous language).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Favorable for UAV/Missile Operations: The ongoing multi-vector attacks (Shaheds, KABs, anticipated strategic missiles) confirm weather conditions are conducive to these operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• No immediate impact on ground operations from weather is reported.

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): At MAXIMUM readiness, actively engaging Shaheds over Kyiv and Poltava, and responding to KAB strikes in Kharkiv. Readiness remains critical due to confirmed strategic bomber takeoffs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground): Maintaining defensive postures. The false claims of a Dnipropetrovsk breakthrough, now linked to specific unit/commander "awards," create significant pressure to commit reserves or verify. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Air): Actively conducting Shahed and KAB strikes. The confirmed takeoff of strategic bombers (Tu-95MS) indicates the next phase of the anticipated large-scale missile attack is now underway or imminent. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Ground): Continued pressure on the Donetsk axis (Konstantinovka direction) confirmed by POW reports. Information operations are actively shaping the narrative for a potential offensive in Dnipropetrovsk. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Information Operations): Highly aggressive and adaptive, escalating claims and using fabricated "awards" to support ground narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Strategic Air Strike Capability: Confirmed launch of Tu-95MS bombers from Olenya indicates Russia retains significant strategic air strike capability for mass missile attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Combined Air-Ground-IO Coordination: The simultaneous KAB strikes, Shahed attacks, and aggressive Dnipropetrovsk IO campaign demonstrate Russia's growing ability to coordinate multi-domain operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Psychological Operations Escalation: The fabricated "Hero of Russia" award for a commander supposedly "advancing in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast" is a new, audacious level of psychological warfare, aiming to demoralize, deceive, and force Ukrainian reactions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Tactical Ground Offensive Capability: Confirmed capture of Ukrainian POWs on the Konstantinovka axis by Naval Infantry suggests sustained, albeit likely localized, ground offensive capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Immediate Retaliation: The strategic bomber launches confirm the intention for an immediate, large-scale retaliatory missile strike following Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Overwhelm Ukrainian Air Defense: Massed Shahed and KAB attacks are intended to degrade and exhaust Ukrainian AD prior to or concurrent with strategic missile strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Legitimize Dnipropetrovsk Offensive: The continued, escalating disinformation about a Dnipropetrovsk breakthrough aims to normalize the narrative, potentially ahead of a real (even if smaller scale) offensive, or to force Ukrainian redeployments. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Demoralize Ukrainian Forces/Public: The combined effects of relentless air attacks and sophisticated IO (POW claims, fabricated awards) are intended to erode morale and trust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Undermine Western Support: Continued TASS reports on Western aid aim to reinforce anti-Ukrainian narratives internationally. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • MLCOA 1 (Confirmed & Escalating): Immediate, Large-Scale Strategic Missile Attack Coordinated with Persistent Ground Pressure and Deepening Deception Operations. Russia is now launching a massive strategic missile strike via Tu-95MS bombers, likely targeting Kyiv, Kharkiv, Poltava, and other key urban centers/infrastructure, following saturation with Shaheds and KABs. Concurrently, KAB strikes on Kharkiv will continue to support ground advances or create urban destruction. On the ground, attritional assaults on the Donetsk axis (Konstantinovka/Pokrovsk) will persist, leveraging any success (e.g., POW captures). Russian IO will intensify their "Dnipropetrovsk breakthrough" narrative, adding more specific (and likely false) details like unit commanders and awards, to amplify pressure on Ukrainian command and create panic.
    • Confidence: HIGH (Strategic bomber launches confirm the immediate, large-scale missile threat. The ongoing Shahed/KAB activity and escalating Dnipropetrovsk IO are directly in line with this combined COA.)
    • Indicators: Reports of missile launches; widespread air alarms; increased intercepts/impacts in major cities; further specific Russian milblogger reports on "advances" or "awards" in Dnipropetrovsk; continued claims of POW captures.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Escalated Dnipropetrovsk Information Operation: The use of specific, named individuals (fabricated or real but misattributed) and "awards" in the Dnipropetrovsk narrative marks a significant escalation in the sophistication of Russian deception. This aims to give the false narrative greater perceived credibility. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Timing of Strategic Strikes: The confirmed strategic bomber activity directly follows successful Ukrainian deep strikes, indicating a rapid, retaliatory response capability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Strategic Missile & UAV Supply: Confirmed Tu-95MS launches and ongoing Shahed/KAB activity indicate Russia maintains sufficient strategic and tactical air munitions for a large-scale strike. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Force Sustainment: Continued offensive actions and POW captures on the Donetsk axis suggest sustained, localized logistics for frontline units. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Information Warfare Capacity: The rapid generation and dissemination of new, specific disinformation (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk commander awards) indicate a highly agile and resourced IO apparatus. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2: The synchronized multi-domain strikes (Shaheds, KABs, strategic missiles) and rapid, coordinated IO campaigns demonstrate effective, centralized Russian C2. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian C2: Ukrainian authorities' rapid public warnings and AD responses demonstrate effective C2 for public safety and military readiness, but will be severely tested by the anticipated strategic strike. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: On HIGHEST alert, currently engaged against Shaheds, and now preparing for incoming strategic missiles. All AD assets are likely at maximum readiness and dispersal protocols are critical. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Forces: Maintaining defensive integrity. The escalating Dnipropetrovsk IO creates psychological pressure and potential for misdirection. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Information Defense: Actively monitoring and countering Russian disinformation, but the volume and increasing specificity of Russian claims (e.g., Dnipropetrovsk commander) require rapid, robust counter-narratives. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Initial AD Engagements: Ukrainian AD is actively engaging incoming Shaheds and responding to KABs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • SBU/HUR Deep Strikes (Prior Reporting Period): The successful strikes on Tu-22M3, Iskander launchers, and the Azot chemical plant, outlined in the previous daily report, continue to force Russian strategic adaptations and impose costs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks:
  • Imminent Strategic Missile Threat: The confirmed takeoff of strategic bombers represents a critical and immediate threat of widespread destruction and potential casualties. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sustained Aerial Attacks: Despite AD efforts, continuous Shahed and KAB attacks strain resources and pose a persistent threat. Explosions in Poltava indicate expanded AOR for strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Sophisticated Psychological Pressure: The escalating and highly specific disinformation regarding a Dnipropetrovsk breakthrough, especially with fabricated awards, poses a significant risk of internal confusion, panic, or misallocation of resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions: The incoming large-scale strategic missile attack will place unprecedented strain on AD munition stockpiles. URGENT international resupply remains paramount. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• ISR for Disinformation Verification: Increased ISR is critical to rapidly and definitively verify or refute Russian ground claims, especially for the Dnipropetrovsk axis, to prevent costly redeployments or panic. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Information Warfare Capabilities: Enhanced capabilities for proactive counter-disinformation and psychological resilience programs are required to mitigate the impact of the increasingly sophisticated Russian IO. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Propaganda - Offensive and Psychological Warfare:
  • "Dnipropetrovsk Breakthrough" - Now with "Awards": The promotion of a fabricated "Hero of Russia" award for a commander supposedly "advancing" in Dnipropetrovsk is a deliberate attempt to solidify the false narrative, lend it credibility, and potentially pre-condition Russian domestic audience for future (possibly real) operations or simply maintain psychological pressure on Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Justification for Retaliation: The framing of Kharkiv KAB strikes as targeting "military objects" is a standard attempt to justify indiscriminate attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Undermining Western Support: TASS continues to promote narratives critical of US aid, aiming to fragment international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • POW Exploitation: The public display of captured Ukrainian POWs is a psychological operation to demoralize forces and civilians. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Information Operations - Transparency and Counter-Disinformation:
  • Timely Threat Warnings: Consistent and prompt warnings from Ukrainian authorities regarding air threats maintain public trust and facilitate preparedness, which is crucial during this extreme threat period. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Direct Refutation of Disinformation (Ongoing Requirement): Continued, aggressive refutation of Russian claims, especially the Dnipropetrovsk narrative, is vital. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Negative Impact (UKR): The immediate threat of a major strategic missile attack, coupled with continued drone/KAB strikes and the aggressive, specific Dnipropetrovsk disinformation campaign, will significantly heighten anxiety and psychological stress across the population and among military personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Positive Impact (UKR): Timely warnings and effective AD responses, where successful, help to maintain a sense of resilience and trust. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Impact (RU): Russian propaganda aims to bolster domestic morale by justifying their actions, claiming battlefield successes (Dnipropetrovsk), and highlighting perceived Western division. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• The Russian disinformation campaign targeting Western aid and political figures could potentially influence international perceptions and put pressure on aid discussions, though no immediate diplomatic shifts are reported. The severity of the incoming missile strike may galvanize further support or increase pressure on Western partners to expedite aid. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• MLCOA 1: Immediate, Widespread Strategic Missile Attack Targeting Critical Infrastructure and Urban Centers, Coordinated with Ground Pressure and Deepening Deception Operations. Russia is currently initiating a large-scale strategic missile assault, likely leveraging the activated Tu-95MS bombers from Olenya and possibly other platforms (e.g., Kh-22, Kinzhal from other airframes) on multiple axes (Kyiv, Kharkiv, Dnipro, Poltava, Odesa). This will be preceded or accompanied by massed Shahed attacks to exhaust AD. KAB strikes on Kharkiv will continue, providing close air support or further urban destruction. On the ground, Russian forces will maintain intense attritional pressure on the Donetsk axis (Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka areas), exploiting any localized gains and capturing POWs. The information campaign will aggressively amplify the fabricated "Dnipropetrovsk breakthrough," using specific (false) details like named commanders and awards, to compel Ukrainian redeployments and induce panic across the civilian population and military.
  • Confidence: HIGH (Confirmed strategic bomber launches and ongoing Shahed/KAB activity directly support this immediate, large-scale, multi-domain attack. The escalating Dnipropetrovsk IO is fully integrated.)
  • Indicators: Widespread air alarms; multiple missile launches reported; severe impacts in Ukrainian cities; further Russian milblogger reports on "advances" or "awards" in Dnipropetrovsk; continued claims of POW captures or Russian "successes" on the ground.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• MDCOA 1: Strategic Decapitation and Operational Breakthrough. Russia conducts an unprecedented, multi-day, multi-wave strategic missile and drone assault designed to systematically target and degrade Ukrainian C2 nodes (military and government), critical energy infrastructure, and key logistics hubs, aiming for functional decapitation or severe disruption. This mass strike would be coordinated with a surprise, rapid, and large-scale ground offensive on the Dnipropetrovsk axis, leveraging a significant operational-level force (e.g., multiple divisions, including the 90th Tank Division) from a previously static or lower-priority sector. This ground push would be supported by intense electronic warfare (EW) to blind Ukrainian ISR and disrupt communications, combined with a real-time, devastating psychological operations campaign to induce mass civilian panic and military collapse, attempting to force a major, uncoordinated Ukrainian retreat.
  • Confidence: MEDIUM (The current IO around Dnipropetrovsk and the confirmed strategic bomber activity directly feed into elements of this MDCOA. The uncertainty lies in Russia's true capability and willingness to commit such a large, integrated ground force for a rapid breakthrough after AD suppression.)
  • Indicators: Sustained multi-day, high-intensity missile/drone attacks; direct targeting of top-tier Ukrainian C2 nodes; simultaneous, rapid, deep penetrations by multiple Russian BTGs/regiments/brigades into Dnipropetrovsk Oblast; widespread and persistent communications outages affecting Ukrainian military and civilian networks; explicit Russian demands for surrender/negotiation from a position of perceived strength; mass internal displacement within Ukraine.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 0-6 Hours (IMMEDIATE - CRITICAL WINDOW):

  • Strategic Missile Strikes: Impact of missiles launched by Tu-95MS bombers from Olenya is imminent within this window, likely targeting Kyiv, Kharkiv, Poltava, Dnipro, Odesa, and other major urban centers/critical infrastructure.
  • Shahed/KAB Threat: Continuation of Shahed activity over Kyiv and central Ukraine, with persistent KAB strikes on Kharkiv.
  • Information Environment: Expect rapid acceleration of Russian propaganda (Dnipropetrovsk narrative, POW exchange manipulation, anti-Western narratives) concurrent with or immediately following missile impacts.
  • Ground Activity: Continued attritional assaults on Donetsk axis. High potential for a test or reconnaissance-in-force on the Dnipropetrovsk axis to gauge Ukrainian response to the escalating IO, even if a full breakthrough is not imminent.
  • Decision Points (UKR):
    • IMMEDIATE: All AD assets to maximum readiness and dispersal protocols for incoming strategic missile strike. Prioritize protection of C2 nodes, critical infrastructure (energy, industrial), and major urban centers.
    • IMMEDIATE: Rapid and aggressive counter-IO on the "Dnipropetrovsk breakthrough" narrative, particularly the fabricated awards. Issue official statements debunking the claims. Task ISR for immediate verification or denial of Russian force presence in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast beyond the current line of contact. Prepare contingency plans for a potential actual ground push on this axis, even if small-scale.
    • URGENT: Disseminate counter-PSYOPS messages to address the disinformation regarding POW bodies and other psychological intimidation tactics. Provide psychological support to exposed personnel.
    • URGENT: Reinforce communication channels and protocols to ensure resilience against potential EW or network saturation during mass attacks.
    • URGENT: Prioritize SIGINT/ELINT on Russian strategic aviation and EW systems to detect further missile launches or shifts in attack vectors. Maintain high vigilance on ground axes for any signs of massing reserves consistent with MDCOA, particularly on the Dnipropetrovsk axis.

• Next 6-24 Hours (Short Term):

  • Post-Strike Assessment: Evaluate damage, casualties, and impact on critical infrastructure from the strategic missile strike.
  • Russian Reaction: Monitor for immediate Russian claims of "successful strikes" or "retaliation."
  • Ukrainian Recovery/Response: Initiate rapid recovery efforts. Continue active defense on all ground axes.
  • Intelligence Gap: Full BDA on the impact of the strategic missile strike. Confirmation of the Dnipropetrovsk ground situation. Russian next steps if initial strategic strike results in less than desired effects.

• Next 24-72 Hours (Medium Term):

  • Sustained Pressure: Russia will likely sustain aerial pressure (Shaheds, KABs) to hinder recovery efforts and maintain psychological pressure.
  • Ground Offensive: Russian ground offensive on Donetsk and possibly Sumy axis will continue. The intensity of any push on Dnipropetrovsk will clarify if the IO was solely a feint or a precursor.
  • Information Warfare: Continued Russian efforts to exploit any perceived Ukrainian weaknesses or Western divisions.

• Intelligence Gaps:

  • Full BDA on Strategic Missile Strike: Precise number, type, and impact locations of all missiles launched by Tu-95MS. (HIGH PRIORITY)
  • Veracity of Dnipropetrovsk Claim: Definitive GEOINT/IMINT/HUMINT on Russian force composition, disposition, and actual advances (if any) in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. Identification and verification of "Colonel Yevgeny Daraev" and the "tank regiment" (if real or fabricated). (HIGHEST PRIORITY)
  • Russian ROE for POWs (Refined): Further verification/documentation of instances where Russia targets its own captured soldiers to refine counter-tactics for extraction. (HIGH PRIORITY)
  • Ukrainian AD Munition Levels: Updated assessment of critical interceptor munition inventories post-mass missile attack. (HIGH PRIORITY)

• Collection Requirements:

  • SIGINT/ELINT: Continuous monitoring of Russian strategic aviation communications and flight paths from all airbases. Identification of EW efforts synchronized with ground or air attacks, especially on Dnipropetrovsk axis.
  • GEOINT/IMINT: High-resolution satellite imagery over all claimed Russian advances, particularly Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, to detect force concentrations or actual penetration. Imagery over key Russian airbases to monitor bomber deployments.
  • HUMINT: From frontline units for accurate reporting on Russian ground tactics, morale, and any unusual force dispositions. From occupied areas, if possible, to verify Russian claims and morale.
  • OSINT: Persistent monitoring of Russian milblogger and state media channels for new narratives, claims, and shifts in propaganda themes. Analysis of public sentiment within Ukraine, particularly regarding the Dnipropetrovsk narrative.

---

END REPORT