Situation Report

OPSEC CLASSIFICATION: NATO SECRET // RELEASABLE TO UKR FORCES

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 08 JUN 25 / 04:12 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 08 JUN 25 / 03:42 ZULU - 08 JUN 25 / 04:12 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update: Kharkiv Oblast, Volyn Oblast, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (including Synelnykivskyi Raion, Mezheva community), Zaporizhzhia Oblast (including Stepnohirsk community, Vasylivskyi Raion), Black Sea, Azov Sea, Sumy Oblast, Russian Federation (Kursk, Bryansk, Kaluga - including Sukhinichi and Borovsk districts, Smolensk Oblasts, Moscow Region including Dubna, Podmoskovye, Moscow city, Pushkino, Vnukovo Airport, Domodedovo Airport; Irkutsk region - Belaya airfield; Tambov Oblast - Michurinsk; Ryazan Oblast - Dyagilevo; Belgorod Oblast - Prokhorovka-Belenikhino, Zhuravlevka, Pushkarozhadinsky, Azov - Rostov Oblast, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast - Kstovo, Sevastopol, Lipetsk Oblast, Orel Oblast, Tula Oblast - Novomoskovsk, Azot chemical plant), Southern Donetsk Direction (including Stupochky), Konstantinovka direction, Siversk direction, Odesa Oblast, Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk, Kurakhovo - Alekseevka, Chasov Yar, Kramatorsk axis, Toretsk axis, Novopavlivka axis, Krasnoarmeysk-Novosergeevka, Maryinka, Dalnee, Sokol, Lipovoe, Bakhmut, Progress, Kleshcheevka, Vasyutinskoye, south Donetsk region), Kupyansk axis, Kherson axis, Ternopil Oblast, Kyiv, Krasnoarmeysk direction, Lviv Oblast, Mykolaiv Oblast (including Varvarivka, Matviivka, Voskresenske, Konstantinivka), Poltava Oblast, Kirovohrad Oblast, Vinnytsia Oblast, Cherkasy Oblast, Zhytomyr Oblast, Kyiv Oblast.

• New Developments (Donetsk Oblast, UKR): TASS reports Russian forces are approx. 6.5 km from Konstantinovka in Donetsk People's Republic (DPR). (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian milblogger reporting, requires verification).

• New Developments (Moscow Region, RU): Rosaviatsiya reports temporary restrictions imposed at Vnukovo and Domodedovo airports. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Official Russian source). Moscow Mayor Sobyanin reports another 3 UAVs downed over Moscow region by MoD air defense forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Official Russian source). Moscow Mayor Sobyanin reports another 2 UAVs downed over Moscow region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Official Russian source). Total of 5 UAVs downed over Moscow region in this reporting period.

• New Developments (Zaporizhzhia Oblast, UKR): Zaporizhzhia OVA reports a man injured in an enemy attack on Vasylivskyi Raion. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Ukrainian official source). This follows previous KAB strike reports.

• New Developments (General): Ukrainian General Staff (Navy) provides a naval situation report for 06:00, 08 JUN 2025. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Ukrainian official source). Fighterbomber, a Russian milblogger, shares photos of helicopters at sunset, likely signifying active aviation operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian milblogger source). Colonelcassad shares photos and content indicating Russian propaganda targeting Ukrainian recruitment efforts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian milblogger source). TASS reports on a French fighter from the "Normandie-Neman" UAV detachment, part of the "Terek" Cossack reconnaissance brigade, Volunteer Corps, confirming Putin's recent statements. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian state media, provides unit details).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Continued UAV activity targeting Moscow region indicates favorable conditions for aerial operations, despite temporary airport restrictions. Helicopter operations reported by Fighterbomber suggest continued clear weather for aviation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Naval): Ukrainian Navy is actively monitoring maritime areas, as indicated by their situation report. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ukrainian Forces (Information Operations): Ukrainian General Staff continues to provide timely updates, maintaining an information advantage where possible. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Air/ISR/Strike): Continued and possibly intensified UAV attacks on Moscow region, leading to airport restrictions and multiple interceptions. This indicates a high tempo of Ukrainian deep strike operations and persistent Russian AD response. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Helicopter activity reported by Fighterbomber suggests active Russian aviation support or patrol operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Russian Forces (Ground): Russian forces continue to claim advances near Konstantinovka, indicating sustained ground pressure. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - requires verification).
• Russian Forces (Information Operations): Russian state media (TASS) and milbloggers (Colonelcassad) are actively disseminating propaganda, notably claiming advances and attempting to undermine Ukrainian recruitment and morale. The highlighted "Normandie-Neman" UAV detachment is part of Russian efforts to portray international support for their war effort and emphasize their combat capabilities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Ground Offensive: Demonstrated capability for sustained ground assaults on key axes, now claiming advances towards Konstantinovka. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Aerial (UAV/Helicopter): Continued ability to conduct UAV attacks into Russian territory (Moscow region) and operate helicopters, likely for support or patrol roles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Information Warfare: Highly capable of rapidly creating and disseminating propaganda, including claims of territorial gains and attempts to degrade Ukrainian morale by portraying "necrophilic" recruitment tactics. Leveraging foreign fighters for propaganda purposes (e.g., "Normandie-Neman" detachment). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Intentions:
  • Degrade Ukrainian Combat Effectiveness: Continue ground assaults and precision drone strikes to inflict casualties and disrupt logistics. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Control Domestic Narrative & Justify Actions: Continue to claim military successes, and portray Ukraine as desperate and immoral, using propaganda to boost internal morale and justify the conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Pressure on Ukraine & Allies: Maintain military pressure on multiple axes and use information operations to undermine international support and Ukrainian resilience. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Courses of Action (COA):

  • COA 1 (MLCOA - Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers and Critical Infrastructure, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions, with Direct Targeting of First Responders, and New Attack Vectors (INCLUDING CHEMICAL HAZARDS AND FALSE FLAG ATROCITIES), and Targeted Degradation of Ukrainian AD (WITH INCREASED PRECISION DRONE STRIKES ON PERSONNEL/LOGISTICS), with Intensified Missile Rhetoric and Propaganda on Ukrainian Surrender): Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Ukrainian urban centers. Concurrently, Russia will continue a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges (using fabricated evidence), blaming Ukraine for delays, exploiting any perceived Western failures or internal divisions, and amplifying claims of Ukrainian military personnel seeking surrender or demonstrating low morale. Russian diplomatic rhetoric will escalate, threatening changes to strategic arms control if Western missile deployments continue. The persistent strike on the Azot chemical plant will lead to Russian retaliatory strikes against Ukrainian chemical or industrial facilities, or an increase in strikes with a focus on creating secondary hazards. Furthermore, Russia will escalate the dissemination of false flag narratives regarding "Ukrainian atrocities" in Russian border regions, and continue to propagate false claims of Ukrainian military retreats and military losses. Russia will continue to employ aviation munitions in contested areas and persist with multi-UAV attacks on cities like Mykolaiv and its surrounding areas, testing Ukrainian AD response. Russia will significantly increase the use of precision tactical drones (both FPV and loitering munitions) to directly target Ukrainian personnel (including under low-light/night conditions), logistics vehicles, and command and control nodes to disrupt frontline operations and inflict casualties, and will use propaganda to highlight these strikes. KAB strikes on Zaporizhzhia Oblast will continue, causing civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure. Persistent UAV attacks on Moscow region will continue, leading to further airport restrictions and claims of interceptions.

    • Confidence: HIGH (Further Strengthened - due to persistent UAV attacks on Moscow region leading to airport restrictions and multiple interceptions, and continued Russian propaganda targeting Ukrainian recruitment).
    • Indicators: (Previous indicators apply). Temporary restrictions at Vnukovo and Domodedovo airports. Moscow Mayor reporting multiple additional UAVs downed over Moscow region (total 5). Colonelcassad's posts on "necrophilia" and TCC.

  • COA 2 (Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Pervasive Precision Drone Strikes, while Enhancing Counter-Deep Strike Internal Security and Expanding Maritime Hybrid Operations, with Enhanced Crimean Defenses, and Increased Internal Propaganda focus alongside Divisive Narratives, and Escalating Missile Rhetoric): Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives on existing axes, supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS, and pervasive precision tactical drone strikes against Ukrainian positions, C2 nodes, logistics, and personnel. They will likely intensify internal security efforts to prevent and detect further Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory, as evidenced by successful UAV interceptions over Kaluga and Pushkino. Additionally, Russia will likely attempt to conduct further hybrid maritime operations in the Black Sea. Russia will increase internal propaganda efforts focusing on state support for veterans and promoting national unity, while simultaneously allowing the amplification of divisive internal narratives. Propaganda will also highlight improvements in battlefield medical care and troop welfare, and demonstrate military effectiveness while portraying Ukrainian military failures and casualties. Russia will use diplomatic channels to escalate rhetoric regarding perceived missile threats from the West, aiming to pressure international actors. Russian ground forces will continue efforts to advance in the Konstantinovka direction, supported by aerial assets like helicopters.

    • Confidence: HIGH (Further Strengthened - due to TASS claiming advances towards Konstantinovka, and Fighterbomber's helicopter photos suggesting active aerial support).
    • Indicators: (Previous indicators apply). TASS reporting Russian forces 6.5 km from Konstantinovka. Fighterbomber photo messages implying active helicopter operations.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Aerial Operations (RU): Russian forces continue to rapidly intercept Ukrainian UAVs targeting Moscow region, demonstrating an adaptive air defense posture. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Operations (RU): Claims of advances near Konstantinovka suggest continued focused pressure on key axes, potentially leveraging air support. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
• Information Operations (RU): Russia is increasingly using detailed narratives and visuals (even if fabricated) to target Ukrainian recruitment and demoralize forces. The showcasing of foreign fighters (e.g., "Normandie-Neman") aims to legitimize their actions and demonstrate international support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Air Defense (RU): Demonstrated continued capability to intercept numerous UAVs over Moscow, implying sufficient AD munitions for local defense. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Forces (RU): Sustained offensive operations suggest adequate logistics for current tempo, but specific details on Konstantinovka axis resupply are unknown. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 for air defense and information operations remains effective, with rapid responses to UAV incursions and coordinated propaganda dissemination. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Ukrainian Air Force and Naval C2 remain effective in issuing warnings and situational reports. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Ukrainian deep strike operations continue to force Russian AD engagements, as seen in Moscow region. This indicates continued Ukrainian deep strike capability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Naval Forces: Ukrainian Navy is actively monitoring its areas of responsibility and issuing reports, demonstrating readiness. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Ground Forces: Under continuous pressure on key axes, including claimed Russian proximity to Konstantinovka. Requires sustained defensive efforts. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Deep Strike Persistence: Continued UAV activity targeting Moscow region confirms sustained Ukrainian deep strike capability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Naval Situational Awareness: Ukrainian Navy's detailed report indicates effective monitoring and control in maritime areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Setbacks:
  • Civilian Casualties (Zaporizhzhia): Continued civilian injuries from enemy attacks, as in Vasylivskyi Raion, highlight the ongoing human cost of the conflict. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
  • Russian Advances (Konstantinovka): Unverified claims of Russian proximity to Konstantinovka, if true, represent a significant tactical setback. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense: Continued UAV activity over Russian territory and KAB/missile strikes on Ukrainian territory underscore the ongoing need for AD systems and munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Civilian Protection: Need for robust civilian defense measures and medical aid due to continued attacks on civilian areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Propaganda (Internal & External):
  • Claiming Territorial Gains: TASS reporting on Russian forces being "6.5 km from Konstantinovka" is designed to project an image of successful advance and demoralize Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - as IO tactic).
  • Undermining Ukrainian Recruitment: Colonelcassad's posts on "TCC becoming necrophiles" are a direct psychological operation aimed at discrediting Ukrainian mobilization efforts, depicting them as forced and inhumane. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - as IO tactic).
  • Legitimizing Russian Actions/Foreign Fighters: The TASS report on the "Normandie-Neman" UAV detachment featuring a French fighter is an attempt to showcase international support for Russia's war and highlight the professionalism and capabilities of their volunteer units. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - as IO tactic).
• Ukrainian Counter-Propaganda/Information Operations:
  • Ukrainian General Staff's timely naval report demonstrates transparency and maintains information control over maritime operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Negative Impact (UKR): Continued civilian injuries from attacks (Zaporizhzhia) contribute to fear and anxiety in frontline communities. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Russian propaganda targeting recruitment efforts aims to undermine Ukrainian public trust and morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).
• Reinforced Narrative (RU): Claims of military advances and narratives of foreign support are designed to boost internal Russian morale and project strength. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• The Russian narrative featuring foreign fighters attempts to counter the perception of international isolation and garner sympathy/support from specific audiences. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH). Temporary airport restrictions in Moscow highlight the domestic impact of the conflict for the Russian populace. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH).

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• MLCOA 1: Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers and Critical Infrastructure, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions, with Direct Targeting of First Responders, and New Attack Vectors (INCLUDING CHEMICAL HAZARDS AND FALSE FLAG ATROCITIES), and Targeted Degradation of Ukrainian AD (WITH INCREASED PRECISION DRONE STRIKES ON PERSONNEL/LOGISTICS), with Intensified Missile Rhetoric and Propaganda on Ukrainian Surrender: Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Ukrainian urban centers. Concurrently, Russia will continue a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges (using fabricated evidence), blaming Ukraine for delays, exploiting any perceived Western failures or internal divisions, and amplifying claims of Ukrainian military personnel seeking surrender or demonstrating low morale. Russian diplomatic rhetoric will escalate, threatening changes to strategic arms control if Western missile deployments continue. The persistent strike on the Azot chemical plant will lead to Russian retaliatory strikes against Ukrainian chemical or industrial facilities, or an increase in strikes with a focus on creating secondary hazards. Furthermore, Russia will escalate the dissemination of false flag narratives regarding "Ukrainian atrocities" in Russian border regions, and continue to propagate false claims of Ukrainian military retreats and military losses. Russia will continue to employ aviation munitions in contested areas and persist with multi-UAV attacks on cities like Mykolaiv and its surrounding areas, testing Ukrainian AD response. Russia will significantly increase the use of precision tactical drones (both FPV and loitering munitions) to directly target Ukrainian personnel (including under low-light/night conditions), logistics vehicles, and command and control nodes to disrupt frontline operations and inflict casualties, and will use propaganda to highlight these strikes. KAB strikes on Zaporizhzhia Oblast will continue, causing civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure. Persistent Ukrainian UAV attacks on Moscow region will continue, leading to further Russian airport restrictions and public claims of interceptions, which Russia will leverage to justify further retaliation.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: (Previous indicators apply). Temporary restrictions at Vnukovo and Domodedovo airports. Moscow Mayor reporting multiple additional UAVs downed over Moscow region (total 5). Colonelcassad's posts on "necrophilia" and TCC. Man injured in Vasylivskyi Raion, Zaporizhzhia Oblast, from enemy attack.

• MLCOA 2: Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Pervasive Precision Drone Strikes, while Enhancing Counter-Deep Strike Internal Security and Expanding Maritime Hybrid Operations, with Enhanced Crimean Defenses, and Increased Internal Propaganda focus alongside Divisive Narratives, and Escalating Missile Rhetoric: Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives on existing axes, supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS, and pervasive precision tactical drone strikes against Ukrainian positions, C2 nodes, logistics, and personnel. They will likely intensify internal security efforts to prevent and detect further Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory. Additionally, Russia will likely attempt to conduct further hybrid maritime operations in the Black Sea. Russia will increase internal propaganda efforts focusing on state support for veterans and promoting national unity, while simultaneously allowing the amplification of divisive internal narratives. Propaganda will also highlight improvements in battlefield medical care and troop welfare, and demonstrate military effectiveness while portraying Ukrainian military failures and casualties. Russia will use diplomatic channels to escalate rhetoric regarding perceived missile threats from the West, aiming to pressure international actors. Russian ground forces will continue offensive operations on existing axes, with a particular focus on gaining ground towards Konstantinovka, supported by regular aviation operations including helicopters. Russia will continue to promote narratives featuring foreign fighters to demonstrate broad support for their operations.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: (Previous indicators apply). TASS reporting Russian forces 6.5 km from Konstantinovka. Fighterbomber photo messages implying active helicopter operations. TASS report on "Normandie-Neman" UAV detachment.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• MDCOA 1: Renewed Large-Scale Ballistic/Cruise Missile Campaign to Cripple Ukrainian AD and Energy/Logistics Infrastructure, with Increased Focus on Chemical/Industrial Targets, and Pre-strike AD Suppression, accompanied by Escalating Missile Rhetoric leading to Actual Missile Deployments: Russia, despite Iskander losses, will attempt to launch a renewed, multi-wave missile and drone campaign targeting Ukraine's critical national infrastructure, with a specific emphasis on overwhelming weakened Ukrainian air defenses. The persistent targeting of the Azot chemical plant, now confirmed as a source for explosives in artillery shells, may trigger a significant, high-volume missile retaliation aimed at Ukraine's critical infrastructure, potentially including targets with industrial chemical significance, aiming to create secondary hazards and disrupt Ukrainian defense production. Prior to or concurrent with these strikes, Russia may conduct widespread air defense suppression operations to improve the effectiveness of their missile and drone attacks. The sustained use of aviation munitions and multi-UAV attacks could be precursors to a larger, more coordinated aerial assault. The increased activity of Russian tactical aviation in the southeastern direction could be a precursor to massed KAB strikes or a coordinated aviation strike package. The explicit statements from Russian MFA on missile deployments and the end of the moratorium could signal preparations for a new phase of strategic missile testing or even deployment in response to perceived Western threats. The increased frequency of UAV attacks on Moscow and resulting airport closures could serve as a trigger or justification for such a large-scale missile campaign, framed as necessary retaliation.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM
  • Indicators: (Previous indicators apply). Sustained high rate of UAV attacks on Moscow region, leading to persistent airport disruptions. Increased Russian military rhetoric linking Ukrainian deep strikes to the need for "decisive response."

• MDCOA 2: Attempted Strategic Breakthrough on Sumy Axis with Major Force Commitment and Massed Air Support (with Chemical Warfare consideration/False Flag Pretext), Enabled by Prior AD Suppression, or Major Breakthrough in Southern Donetsk, Supported by Increased Psychological Operations, or Accelerated Push on Konstantinovka: Russia commits substantial additional reserves to the Sumy axis, initiating a rapid, decisive breakthrough aimed at encircling or seizing Sumy city. This would involve overwhelming combined arms force, massed KAB strikes to suppress Ukrainian defenses, and deep strikes to neutralize Ukrainian command and control and logistics in the region. This would be significantly facilitated by prior air defense suppression operations. Given the recent persistent strike on the Azot chemical plant, and Russia's past false flag attempts regarding chemical weapons, there is a low but non-zero risk of Russia preparing to conduct an operation with chemical munitions or a "dirty bomb" in the context of a strategic breakthrough, or blame Ukraine for such an event, potentially fabricating evidence. The recent Russian false flag propaganda concerning "Ukrainian occupation" and mass casualties in Kursk Oblast provides a potential pretext for such an escalation or for justifying a disproportionate response. Alternatively, Russia could concentrate forces for a strategic breakthrough in the Southern Donetsk direction, leveraging claimed gains around Stupochky to expand an offensive aimed at a larger operational objective. This would be supported by amplified psychological operations claiming mass Ukrainian surrenders or demoralization to undermine resistance. An accelerated and decisive push to seize Konstantinovka, leveraging massed fire and air support, could also occur, aimed at disrupting Ukrainian logistics in the Donetsk region.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM
  • Indicators: (Previous indicators apply). Significant increase in Russian ground force massing and logistics in the Konstantinovka direction, beyond current offensive tempo, coupled with heightened air and artillery support.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 24-48 Hours (Short-Term):

  • Immediate Retaliation/Sustained Attacks: Expect continued, possibly intensified, KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Kharkiv, Sumy, Zaporizhzhia (including Stepnohirsk, Vasylivskyi Raion), Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipropetrovsk (including Synelnykivskyi Raion), Vinnytsia, Kyiv, and Zhytomyr Oblasts, with heightened risk of targeting first responders and civilian infrastructure. Expect continued Russian propaganda amplifying Western divisions and escalating false flag narratives regarding Ukrainian "atrocities" in Russian border regions, alongside false claims of Ukrainian retreats and military losses, and claims of mass Ukrainian surrender appeals. Expect continued and increased precision drone strikes on Ukrainian personnel, vehicles, and logistics. Expect continued Russian diplomatic rhetoric regarding missile deployments to put pressure on Western allies. Expect persistent Ukrainian UAV attacks on Moscow region, leading to continued airport restrictions and Russian AD activity. Civilian casualties in Zaporizhzhia Oblast from Russian attacks are highly likely.
  • Ground Pressure: Continued tactical ground engagements, particularly on the Donetsk (Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka, Stupochky) and Sumy axes. Immediate verification of TASS claims of Russian forces 6.5 km from Konstantinovka is crucial.
  • Naval Status: Ukrainian Navy will continue monitoring Black and Azov Seas.
  • Decision Point (UKR): Prioritize air defense assets to protect key urban centers and critical infrastructure. Immediately counter Russian disinformation on body exchanges, POW testimonies, Western internal politics, and new claims of Ukrainian military appeals for surrender. Proactively counter Russian false flag narratives. Immediately verify claimed Russian proximity to Konstantinovka and prepare appropriate defensive response or refutation. Enhance local AD and EW capabilities against persistent multi-UAV threats. Implement immediate countermeasures and enhanced force protection against precision tactical drone strikes. Formulate a response to Russian diplomatic statements regarding missile deployments. Monitor the impact of UAV attacks on Moscow region and be prepared for potential shifts in Russian retaliatory targets or intensity.

• Next 72 Hours (Medium-Term):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the full impact of Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian logistics/production and prepare for potential severe retaliatory strikes. Re-evaluate and adapt ground force deployments on the Sumy axis. Expedite high-level diplomatic engagement regarding AD systems. Monitor and respond to escalating Russian disinformation campaigns targeting Western unity and Ukrainian credibility, including the new emphasis on "Ukrainian surrender" narratives and Russian claims of tactical advances. Initiate contingency planning for potential chemical or biological contamination scenarios. Re-assess defensive lines in Southern Donetsk and Konstantinovka based on verified Russian gains or false claims. Conduct a comprehensive review of anti-drone TTPs and equipment needs for ground forces, prioritizing rapid procurement and deployment. Assess the implications of Ryabkov's statements on strategic stability and missile proliferation for Ukraine's defense posture and diplomatic efforts. Assess the broader impact of persistent Ukrainian deep strikes into Russia (e.g., Moscow region) on Russian military decision-making and public sentiment.

• Next 1 Week (Near-Term Strategic):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the overall effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strike campaign on Russian military-industrial complex and logistics. Continue to optimize air defense deployments. Intensify intelligence collection on Russian strategic aviation, air defense assets, potential dispersal efforts, and maritime special operations. Prioritize resources for the Sumy axis if Russian pressure continues, potentially initiating pre-emptive civilian evacuation planning. Reinforce maritime security measures in the Black Sea and Azov Sea. Conduct a comprehensive review of all critical Ukrainian industrial facilities, particularly chemical plants, for vulnerability assessment and hardening measures against potential Russian retaliatory strikes. Develop long-term strategies to counter Russian information warfare, including a robust response to narratives aimed at undermining military morale through surrender claims. Conduct a strategic review of defensive lines in Southern Donetsk and Konstantinovka, considering potential further Russian advances. Develop and implement a comprehensive, long-term strategy for countering Russian pervasive tactical drone threats, including layered defenses, training, and technological innovation. Prepare for potential shifts in the international arms control landscape and their impact on Ukraine's long-term security. Assess how the continued high-frequency UAV attacks on Russian territory influence Russian strategic calculations and their willingness to escalate.

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize and Augment Air Defense for Eastern, Southern, Central, Western, and Northern Urban Centers, with Enhanced First Responder Protection and Adapting to New UAV/Missile Ingress Routes, While Assessing and Mitigating AD Losses (Immediate & Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately re-prioritize and reinforce layered air defense systems (including mobile fire groups with MANPADS for KAB and drone defense) to protect Kharkiv, Sumy, Mykolaiv (specifically Mykolaiv city and Konstantinivka), Odesa, Dnipro (specifically Synelnykivskyi Raion), Kryvyi Rih, Poltava, Kirovohrad, Vinnytsia, Kyiv, Zhytomyr, and Zaporizhzhia Oblast (including Stepnohirsk community and Vasylivskyi Raion), from continued KAB and missile/UAV attacks. Implement enhanced force protection measures for all emergency services personnel. Expedite diplomatic efforts for the acquisition of additional advanced AD systems and secure urgent resupply of interceptor munitions. Allocate AD assets to counter new UAV threat vectors. Analyze new western/northwestern-bound UAV ingress routes and new missile trajectories to pre-position AD assets and optimize interception tactics. Prioritize defense of Vinnytsia city, Kyiv, and Zhytomyr against the direct UAV threat. Monitor tactical aviation activity in the Eastern and Southeastern directions. Immediately verify the claimed destruction of the P-18 radar in Sumy Oblast and rapidly assess any resulting gaps in air situational awareness. Account for new UAV and missile threats in Mykolaiv and Kherson Oblasts, and develop specific tactics and deploy additional short-range AD systems (e.g., mobile fire groups with MANPADS, anti-drone guns) to counter multiple incoming UAVs in areas like Konstantinivka, Mykolaiv Oblast. Monitor Russian AD responses to Ukrainian deep strikes into Russia (e.g., Moscow region) to identify areas of vulnerability and assess the impact of Ukrainian operations on Russian civilian infrastructure and daily life.
   • Justification: Russian forces are deliberately escalating attacks on civilian areas and opening new attack vectors to inflict casualties and psychological impact. The persistent KAB strikes, ongoing UAV threats, and missile activity underscore the urgency and breadth of the threat. The injury of SES workers and new civilian casualty in Vasylivskyi Raion highlights a direct targeting of first responders and civilians. The Russian claim of destroying a P-18 radar indicates an active Russian effort to suppress Ukrainian AD. New UAV activity and missile launches in Mykolaiv and Kherson Oblasts demonstrate a further broadening of Russian aerial threats. The warning of aviation munition use in Synelnykivskyi Raion, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, and the simultaneous multi-UAV threat on Mykolaiv (specifically Konstantinivka) indicate a continued and evolving Russian aerial threat pattern. The persistent Ukrainian UAV attacks on Moscow region, leading to repeated airport closures and multiple interceptions, confirm the effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strike operations in disrupting Russian civilian and military operations. This, in turn, may provoke further Russian retaliatory strikes.
   • Intelligence Gap: Real-time air defense munition expenditure rates in affected areas and current inventory levels for key systems; full extent of Russian UAV reconnaissance and strike capabilities. Russian intent and capability for deliberate targeting of first responders. Specific objectives of new UAV ingress routes and missile targeting. Full analysis of Russian tactical aviation activity and KAB targeting priorities. Independent BDA on the claimed P-18 radar destruction and its impact. Precise flight paths, launch locations, and targets of new UAVs and missiles in Mykolaiv and Kherson Oblasts. Precise type of aviation munition in Synelnykivskyi Raion. Precise flight paths and intended targets of the multiple UAVs inbound to Mykolaiv and Konstantinivka. Precise BDA on KAB strike in Stepnohirsk and Vasylivskyi Raion. Full analysis of Russian AD response times and effectiveness to UAVs over Moscow region, and the specific impact on Russian air traffic and civilian life.
   • Collection Requirement: Automated tracking of AD engagements and munition usage, updated imagery of damaged civilian sites for munition analysis, SIGINT/HUMINT on AD system readiness, drone flight path analysis. HUMINT/OSINT on Russian TTPs regarding first responder targeting. IMINT/SIGINT on UAV launch locations and operational patterns. SIGINT on missile launch locations and targets. SIGINT/IMINT of UAV trajectories to identify likely launch areas and staging points. SIGINT/IMINT on Russian tactical aviation movements and KAB targets. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on the location of the claimed P-18 strike. IMINT/OSINT/HUMINT on KAB strike locations and damage. SIGINT/IMINT/OSINT on UAV flight paths and missile trajectories. Real-time tracking and SIGINT of UAVs entering Mykolaiv Oblast. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on UAV flight paths and interception locations over Moscow region, and impact assessments of airport disruptions.

2. Sustain and Exploit Deep Strike Successes, Prepare for Retaliation and Enhanced Russian Defenses, Targeting Chemical/Industrial Nodes Critical to Ammunition Production, While Assessing Russian Internal Security Adaptations (Urgent):

   • Action: Conduct rapid, detailed BDA on the destroyed Iskander launchers, the logistics train, the Tu-22M3 bomber, and the "Azot" chemical plant in Novomoskovsk, Tula Oblast to confirm operational impact. Publicize these successes widely. Simultaneously, prepare for heightened Russian retaliatory strikes across Ukraine, particularly on strategic infrastructure. Disperse high-value assets and reinforce their defenses. Continue to assess targets for further deep strikes on Russian logistics and military-industrial complex, prioritizing industrial nodes with confirmed or high-probability links to military production, especially those providing raw materials or components for ammunition. Integrate FPV drone operations more widely for precision strikes on personnel and high-value equipment. Leverage SOF for continued cross-border raids against high-value Russian personnel and forward operating bases. Develop and deploy countermeasures to Russian new warning systems (e.g., in Sevastopol) and airfield restrictions (e.g., Kaluga, Vnukovo, Domodedovo), assessing their impact on Ukrainian deep strike TTPs. Analyze the TASS report on the "Voskresensky Plant 'Mashinostroitel'" and new FPV drone footage from Colonelcassad and TASS/MoD drone video to identify typical Russian FPV targets and improve Ukrainian countermeasures. Assess the effectiveness of Russian air defense in Kaluga Oblast against the 7 downed UAVs. Monitor reports on the eliminated fire at the Pushkino fuel/lubricants warehouse to determine the effectiveness of the initial Ukrainian strike and the speed of Russian damage control and recovery. Analyze the repeated successful UAV attacks on Moscow region and subsequent airport closures as a key deep strike impact, and seek opportunities to replicate or escalate this disruption.
   • Justification: Ukrainian deep strikes are a significant strategic success but will provoke severe retaliation. The destruction of a logistics train highlights a key vulnerability. Russian attempts to adapt to drone threats and deep strikes (new warning systems, airport restrictions) must be actively countered. The persistent strike on a chemical industrial plant is a critical new category of target. The successful extinguishing of the fire in Pushkino and interceptions in Kaluga indicate Russia's efforts to mitigate deep strike effects. The new FPV drone video from Colonelcassad and TASS/MoD drone video provide insight into Russian tactical operations. The repeated successful UAV attacks on Moscow, leading to airport closures, directly impact Russian civilian life and critical infrastructure, demonstrating Ukraine's capability to bring the war to Russian territory.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full BDA and long-term operational impact on Russian ballistic missile capabilities, Southern logistics, and strategic aviation. Specific details on the GRU personnel targeted in the SOF raid. Effectiveness of Russian counter-drone adaptations. Full impact of Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian air force operations. Full implications of new Sevastopol warning systems on Ukrainian maritime drone operations. Detailed analysis of Russian chemical industrial production facilities. Nature of the dispute with "Mashinostroitel". Full analysis of target in Colonelcassad's FPV video and TASS/MoD video. Specific type and capabilities of UAVs downed over Kaluga. Detailed BDA of the Pushkino strike. Specific BDA on Moscow region UAV strikes and the extent of their impact on airports and air traffic; the specific types of UAVs used in these attacks.
   • Collection Requirement: High-resolution satellite imagery of Bryansk/Kursk missile sites, Southern logistics hubs, Russian airfields (especially Engels, Belaya, Dyagilevo, Kaluga, Vnukovo, Domodedovo), and other military-industrial targets, including Novomoskovsk's "Azot" plant. Monitoring Russian strategic aviation movements. HUMINT/SIGINT on Russian GRU force composition. IMINT/OSINT on Russian vehicle adaptations. SIGINT/OSINT on new Russian warning systems. Targeted intelligence on Russian chemical industrial production. OSINT/HUMINT on the "Voskresensky Plant 'Mashinostroitel'" dispute. IMINT/OSINT of the target from Colonelcassad's FPV video and TASS/MoD video. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on UAV characteristics downed in Kaluga. SIGINT/IMINT of the Pushkino fuel/lubricants warehouse. Real-time IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on Moscow region airports (Vnukovo, Domodedovo) during and after UAV incidents for BDA and operational impact assessment; technical analysis of recovered UAV debris from Moscow attacks.

3. Intensify Counter-Information Warfare on Humanitarian Issues, Western Divisions, and Russian Fabrications, Addressing Internal Russian Propaganda, and Debunking False Claims of Success, including New "Surrender" Narratives and Strategic Missile Rhetoric (Ongoing & Critical):

   • Action: Proactively and transparently communicate Ukraine's official stance and actions regarding prisoner and body exchanges, consistently refuting Russian disinformation. Immediately and publicly expose Russian fabrications, such as the "future-dated" body lists and the alleged POW video. Immediately and aggressively counter Russian claims of "relatives of Ukrainian military" appealing for surrender, providing context on forced recruitment, psychological pressure, or outright fabrication. Highlight Russian violations of international law to discredit their humanitarian claims. Publicly counter Russian narratives attempting to exploit Western internal politics and international relations. Formulate a clear and firm public response to Russian diplomatic statements (e.g., Ryabkov's comments on missile deployments), emphasizing Ukraine's sovereign right to defense. Leverage the opening of rehabilitation centers to showcase Ukrainian commitment. Monitor and analyze Russian internal propaganda related to veteran support, cultural events, and especially inflammatory narratives concerning migration/ethnic issues. Specifically analyze Russian military propaganda videos to identify key messaging and counter it. Crucially, actively counter the escalating Russian false flag narrative from Kursk Oblast. Immediately refute and expose false claims of Ukrainian retreat. Monitor and analyze Russian milblogger polls. Immediately and aggressively counter the new Russian narrative regarding civilian casualties at the Azot plant, emphasizing its legitimate military target status, and expose the "Goncharovka" civilian account as part of a broader false flag campaign. Immediately and publicly refute Russian claims of destroying Ukrainian military assets if independent BDA indicates otherwise. Publicly acknowledge successful AD interceptions of UAVs over Russia, framing them as defensive measures and highlighting Russian aggression. Immediately refute TASS claims of significant Russian expansion near Stupochky if found false. Immediately and publicly refute Russian claims of advances towards Konstantinovka if not verifiable by independent sources, or provide context if limited tactical gains are made.
   • Justification: Russia is leveraging highly sensitive humanitarian issues, internal Western political dynamics, and sensationalist narratives for information warfare, using increasingly blatant fabrications. Russian diplomatic statements are explicitly trying to set conditions for further escalation. Effective, consistent counter-narratives are critical. The proliferation of internal Russian propaganda, particularly the divisive narratives about "replacement of the Russian people," requires monitoring. The specific focus on medical care and claimed tactical successes/Ukrainian failures in Russian propaganda indicates a recognized vulnerability or area for morale boosting. The subtle use of polls in specific Ukrainian cities indicates an evolving, more nuanced Russian IO tactic. The rapid reporting of Azot casualties and the Goncharovka video clearly demonstrate Russia's intent to exploit any civilian impact for propaganda. Russian claims of destroying high-value Ukrainian military assets are designed to demoralize. Ukrainian deep strikes into Russia, including UAVs over Moscow, provide opportunities to demonstrate capability and shift narratives. The repeated successful interceptions of UAVs over Moscow, publicly reported by Russia, create an opportunity to highlight Ukraine's deep strike capabilities. The TASS report on Trump/Musk conflict and Finland PM's condemnation of Trump are clear attempts to sow discord. The KAB strike on Stepnohirsk and civilian injury in Vasylivskyi Raion offer Russia another opportunity to deflect blame. The new Russian claim of proximity to Konstantinovka is a direct IO attempt to undermine Ukrainian morale and requires immediate, factual counter-messaging.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full scope of Russian information narratives targeting Ukrainian society and Western audiences. Identification of key Russian PSYOP themes. Understanding the intent and impact of highly divisive internal Russian propaganda. Effectiveness of Russian military propaganda. Full details on the alleged "occupation" in Russkoye Porechnoye, Kursk Oblast. Verification of Russian claims near Kamenka/Stroyevka. Detailed analysis of Russian milblogger polling data. Independent verification of Goncharovka incident. Impact and reach of Russian milblogger claims of P-18 radar destruction. Independent BDA on Konstantinovka FPV strike. Full analysis of Russian messaging related to AD interceptions over Moscow. Verification of TASS reporting on Trump/Musk. Independent BDA on claimed MaxxPro destruction. Independent BDA on Colonelcassad's new FPV video. Independent verification of TASS claims of Russian expansion near Stupochky. Full analysis of Russian messaging related to AD interceptions over Mykolaiv. Full BDA on targets in TASS/MoD drone video and Colonelcassad thermal footage. Impact of WSJ/Pentagon UFO story. Specific data supporting Russian claims of 3,500 appeals from Ukrainian military relatives. Impact of Ryabkov's statements on international diplomatic efforts. Independent verification of TASS claim of Russian forces being 6.5 km from Konstantinovka; impact of Colonelcassad's "necrophilia" posts on Ukrainian military recruitment; the specific reach and effectiveness of the "Normandie-Neman" unit narrative.
   • Collection Requirement: Comprehensive monitoring of Russian state media and milblogger channels. OSINT analysis of specific Russian PSYOP channels. Targeted OSINT/HUMINT on internal Russian social dynamics. Detailed content analysis of Russian military propaganda videos. Immediate OSINT/HUMINT/IMINT of Russkoye Porechnoye. Immediate IMINT/HUMINT of Kamenka/Stroyevka. Systematic collection and analysis of Russian milblogger polls. Immediate OSINT/HUMINT/IMINT of Goncharovka. OSINT monitoring of Russian milblogger channels for further claims of Ukrainian AD system destruction. IMINT/SIGINT/HUMINT for BDA on Konstantinovka FPV strike. OSINT monitoring of Russian state and milblogger media for messaging regarding UAV interceptions over Moscow. OSINT on TASS and Rolling Stone regarding Trump/Musk. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on claimed MaxxPro destruction. IMINT/OSINT of Colonelcassad's FPV video. IMINT/HUMINT/OSINT on Stupochky area. OSINT monitoring of local Mykolaiv channels. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT for BDA on TASS/MoD drone video targets and Colonelcassad thermal footage. Content analysis of Russian information channels for mention of the WSJ/Pentagon UFO story. SIGINT/HUMINT on Russian MFA communications. OSINT on Russian state media and milblogger channels for further claims of Ukrainian military appeals for surrender. IMINT/OSINT on the Konstantinovka axis to verify Russian claims of advance; OSINT on Colonelcassad's "necrophilia" posts to gauge their reach and engagement; OSINT on the TASS "Normandie-Neman" report to assess its amplification and target audience reaction.

4. Reinforce and Monitor Sumy and Konstantinovka Axis Defenses, Verify Russian Claims, and Account for Potential AD Degradation, while Adapting to New Precision Drone Threats (Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately reinforce personnel, fortifications, and anti-tank capabilities on the Sumy axis. Intensify ISR collection on Russian force composition, strength, and objectives. Advise civilian authorities on potential evacuation routes. Conduct aggressive counter-battery fire. Similarly, reinforce defenses and conduct ISR on the Konstantinovka axis. Prepare for potential increased KAB/UAV/missile strikes on Sumy Oblast. Immediately verify the Russian claim of a Krab SPG destruction and the FPV strike on a UAV C2/dugout in Konstantinovka. Analyze the "ZONA SVO" video claiming Ukrainian assault deaths. Allocate additional AD/EW assets to these fronts where feasible. If the P-18 radar destruction in Sumy Oblast is confirmed, adjust ground force defensive planning. Immediately verify TASS claims of Ukrainian retreat. Improve force protection measures for drone crews. Immediately verify the Russian MoD claim of a MaxxPro loss. Immediately verify TASS claims of significant Russian expansion near Stupochky. Implement enhanced camouflage, dispersal, and active/passive counter-drone measures for all personnel and vehicles operating in frontline areas. Update training protocols for personnel on drone threat identification. Monitor for any shifts in Russian ground force deployments or tactics in Zaporizhzhia Oblast following the KAB strike on Stepnohirsk and the attack on Vasylivskyi Raion. Immediately verify TASS claims of Russian forces being 6.5 km from Konstantinovka via IMINT/HUMINT/OSINT and adjust defensive planning accordingly.
   • Justification: Russian claims of an "expanding buffer zone" and confirmed advances indicate a serious intent to press the Sumy axis. The continued focus on the Novopavlivka and Pokrovsk directions, and new claims on Konstantinovka and Stupochky, also indicate sustained pressure on ground forces. The SOF raid highlights active Russian presence. Russian claims of KAB strikes and new UAV activity further indicate their focus. The claimed Krab SPG destruction and FPV strike on a UAV C2 node highlight Russian tactical adaptation. The claimed FPV strike on "Baba-Yaga" and drone crews demonstrates a serious threat to Ukrainian drone assets and personnel. Russian propaganda videos purporting to show Ukrainian casualties are designed to demoralize. The continuing KAB launches underscore the aerial component of Russian ground pressure. The claimed P-18 radar destruction, if confirmed, represents a direct attempt to degrade Ukrainian defenses. TASS claims of Ukrainian retreat require immediate military response. The claimed MaxxPro loss, if verified, represents a tangible loss. TASS claims of expanding control near Stupochky represent a potential tactical setback. New Russian drone videos confirm a highly effective threat from precision tactical drones. The KAB strike on Stepnohirsk and the attack on Vasylivskyi Raion, while aerial, could be a precursor to increased ground activity in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. The specific claim of proximity to Konstantinovka indicates a renewed or intensified focus on this axis.
   • Intelligence Gap: Precise composition and strength of Russian forces on Sumy and Konstantinovka/Southern Donetsk axes. Independent BDA on Russian claim of Krab SPG destruction and FPV strike on UAV C2. Full details on the incident depicted in the "ZONA SVO" video. Detailed assessment of Russian KAB targeting accuracy. Operational impact of potential P-18 radar loss. Independent verification of TASS claim of Ukrainian retreat. Full BDA on Konstantinovka FPV strike. Independent BDA on claimed MaxxPro destruction. Independent BDA on TASS claims of Russian expansion near Stupochky. Full BDA on targets in TASS/MoD drone video and Colonelcassad thermal footage. Assessment of Russian drone capabilities for night operations. Any changes in Russian ground force massing or movement in Zaporizhzhia Oblast. Independent verification of TASS claim regarding proximity to Konstantinovka; specific Russian units and their strength operating on the Konstantinovka axis.
   • Collection Requirement: HUMINT from local sources, SIGINT on Russian communications, IMINT for troop movements and fortifications, cross-referencing Russian map claims with ground truth. Immediate IMINT of Vasyutinskoye area for BDA, SIGINT on Russian drone activity. Detailed frame-by-frame analysis of "ZONA SVO" video. IMINT/SIGINT of Konstantinovka to verify the FPV strike and BDA. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on KAB strike locations. IMINT/SIGINT on Russian reconnaissance and strike activity in Sumy Oblast. IMINT/HUMINT of Kamenka/Stroyevka area. IMINT/SIGINT on Konstantinovka to verify the FPV strike. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on claimed MaxxPro destruction. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on Stupochky area. IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT for BDA on TASS/MoD drone video targets and Colonelcassad thermal footage. IMINT/SIGINT on Konstantinovka axis for Russian force disposition, movements, and claimed advances. HUMINT from local sources near Konstantinovka.

5. Enhance Maritime Security in the Black Sea and Crimea, and Bolster Air Defense in Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Kherson, while maintaining vigilance on Russian naval operations (New & Critical):

   • Action: Increase Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) in areas with critical maritime infrastructure (ports, offshore platforms, key shipping lanes) in the Black Sea, particularly off Odesa, Mykolaiv, and the Ukrainian coast, and intensify ISR on Sevastopol and other Crimean naval bases. Develop and deploy enhanced physical and electronic security measures for offshore platforms, subsea cables, and pipelines. Share intelligence on Russian maritime special operations (e.g., "Espanola" unit's TTPs, "Два майора" claims) with relevant maritime security agencies and allied nations. Prioritize monitoring of specific offshore platforms and naval assets for signs of Russian activity. Analyze the new Sevastopol warning signals to understand their operational triggers. Increase AD readiness in Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Kherson for incoming missile and UAV threats, and integrate maritime and air defense efforts to counter coordinated attacks. Maintain continuous monitoring of Russian naval vessels, including missile carriers, in both the Black and Azov Seas, despite their current reported absence. Analyze the Ukrainian Navy's situation report to identify any emerging threats or shifts in Russian naval posture.
   • Justification: The "Espanola" unit's video and "Два майора" claims demonstrate a sophisticated Russian capability for maritime sabotage. The introduction of new, specific warning signals in Sevastopol indicates heightened Russian concern. The confirmed missile threat towards Odesa, and new UAV and missile activity in Mykolaiv and Kherson Oblasts, highlight the continued aerial threat to these vital port cities and regions. The continued multi-UAV threat on Mykolaiv underscores the need for robust and adaptable local air defense. The Ukrainian Navy's report provides valuable real-time insight into the maritime domain.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full understanding of "Espanola" unit's capabilities. Precise location and function of the "infrastructure" claimed destroyed by "Два майора." Full details on the triggers and operational procedures for the new Sevastopol warning signals. Precise launch location and intended target of missile towards Odesa, Mykolaiv, and Voznesensk, and UAV activity in Mykolaiv and Kherson. Precise flight paths and intended targets of the multiple UAVs inbound to Mykolaiv and Konstantinivka. Reason for current absence of Russian missile carriers. Any specific intelligence from the Ukrainian Navy's report indicating new Russian naval movements or capabilities.
   • Collection Requirement: IMINT/OSINT on Russian naval special forces units, SIGINT on their communications, HUMINT from Black Sea region. Commercial satellite imagery of offshore infrastructure. SIGINT/OSINT on Sevastopol air defense and naval activities. SIGINT on missile launch origin and trajectory analysis. SIGINT/IMINT on UAV launch locations and flight paths. Real-time tracking and SIGINT of UAVs entering Mykolaiv Oblast. Continuous IMINT/SIGINT/OSINT on Russian naval movements. Detailed analysis of the Ukrainian Navy's situation report for any anomalies or new data points.

---

END REPORT