Situation Report

OPSEC CLASSIFICATION: NATO SECRET // RELEASABLE TO UKR FORCES

INTELLIGENCE SITUATION REPORT (ISR) TIME OF REPORT: 07 JUN 25 / 20:12 ZULU REPORTING PERIOD: 07 JUN 25 / 19:42 ZULU - 07 JUN 25 / 20:12 ZULU PREPARED BY: Senior Military Intelligence Analyst, Eastern European Warfare Desk

---

1. SITUATION OVERVIEW

1.1. Battlefield Geometry and Key Terrain:

• AOR Update: Kharkiv Oblast (Kharkiv City - Kyivskyi, Osnovyanskyi, Shevchenkivskyi Districts, suburbs, Kommunar factory, recreational park, children's railway, central part, educational building near railway), Volyn Oblast (Lutsk), Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Dnipro, oblast border, Kryvyi Rih, Pavlohrad, Pleshcheevka, Malinovka, Charivne, Mezheva community, Synelnykove district, Nikopol region, Petrykivska community), Zaporizhzhia Oblast (14 populated areas, Zaporozhye direction, Orikhiv, Huliaipole, Chervonne, Malinovka), Black Sea, Azov Sea, Sumy Oblast (Sumy direction, Yunakivka, Kondratovka, Alexandropol, Klymentove, Uhroyidy, Novonikolaevka, Pisarevka, Khotin, Vorochina, Nizhnya Duvanka, Yablonovka, Andreevka), Russian Federation (Kursk, Bryansk, Kaluga, Smolensk Oblasts, Moscow Region including Dubna, Podmoskovye, Moscow city (Gorbushkin Dvor, VDNKh), Pushkino, Irkutsk region - Belaya airfield; Tambov Oblast - Michurinsk; Ryazan Oblast - Dyagilevo; Belgorod Oblast - Prokhorovka-Belenikhino, Zhuravlevka, Pushkarozhadinsky, Azov - Rostov Oblast, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast - Kstovo, Sevastopol, Lipetsk Oblast, Orel Oblast), Southern Donetsk Direction (Fedorivka, Perbudova, Komar, Maksimovka, Razdolnoye, Vorskresenka, Poddubnoye, Velyka Novosilka, Chasov Yar), Konstantinovka direction (Novoolenovka, Novaya Poltavka, Tarasovka, Ignatovka, Zarya), Siversk direction (Serebryanka, Hryhorivka, Bilohorivka, Verkhnokamyanske, Vyimka, Ivano-Daryivka, Pereizne), Odesa Oblast, Donetsk Oblast (Pokrovsk, Kurakhovo - Alekseevka, Chasov Yar, Kramatorsk axis, Toretsk axis, Novopavlivka axis, Krasnoarmeysk-Novosergeevka, Maryinka, Dalnee, Sokol, Lipovoe, Bakhmut, Progress, Kleshcheevka), Kupyansk axis (Zahryzove, Stepova Novoselivka), Kherson axis (Mykolayivka, Berislav), Ternopil Oblast, Kyiv, Krasnoarmeysk direction, Lviv Oblast (Drohobych), Mykolaiv Oblast, Poltava Oblast, Kirovohrad Oblast.

• Key Terrain (Mezheva Community, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast - NEW): Russian KAB strike confirmed on Mezheva community, resulting in one fatality and damage to a kindergarten. This marks an expansion of KAB usage beyond Kharkiv and Sumy to central-eastern Ukraine. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Kherson Oblast - NEW): Local authorities report a 72-year-old pensioner killed in an attack on Kherson Oblast. While method is not specified, this indicates continued targeting of civilian areas in the south. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Kirovohrad Oblast - NEW): AFU reports enemy UAVs moving north towards Kirovohrad Oblast, west of Kryvyi Rih. This indicates a new, westernmost penetration of UAVs and potential targeting of central Ukrainian regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Konstantinovka Direction - NEW): Russian milblogger "Операция Z" claims 103rd Regiment is advancing towards Konstantinovka, "destroying Ukrainian infantry in ruins." This suggests intense urban or semi-urban combat and Russian focus on this specific axis. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA/advance).

• Key Terrain (Southern Donetsk Direction - NEW): "Воин DV" (milblogger) claims operators of the 14th Separate Guards Special Purpose Brigade (GRV SpN) of the "Vostok" Group of Forces destroyed vehicles and communication equipment. This highlights continued Russian Special Forces involvement and drone operations on this axis. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA).

• Key Terrain (Kharkiv City - UPDATED): Casualties from KAB strikes on Kharkiv continue to rise, with a 62-year-old man dying in the hospital, bringing the confirmed fatalities to two. This confirms the severe impact of the strike. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

• Key Terrain (Kursk and Orel Oblasts, RF - NEW): Russian MoD claims 32 Ukrainian UAVs destroyed over Kursk and Orel Oblasts within three hours. This indicates sustained Ukrainian deep strike activity against targets in these Russian border regions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Russian MOD claim of interception).

1.2. Weather and Environmental Factors Affecting Operations:

• Continued KAB strikes in Dnipropetrovsk and Kharkiv will lead to persistent debris and structural damage, particularly in civilian areas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The large-scale fire in Pushkino continues to be a major incident affecting air quality and potentially visibility in the Moscow region. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Maritime operations in the Black Sea, as evidenced by the "Espanola" video and "Два майора" claims, remain susceptible to sea state and weather conditions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

1.3. Current Force Dispositions and Control Measures:

• Ukrainian Forces (Air Defense): Continue to face threats from KABs in Kharkiv and Sumy, new KAB threats in Dnipropetrovsk, and new UAV threats in Mykolaiv/Kherson/Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts and now further west into Kirovohrad Oblast. AFU issued a warning for aviation munitions in Kharkiv and Sumy, and for reconnaissance drones in Poltava. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Zelenskiy's urgent public plea for AD systems underscores critical needs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Ukrainian forces continue to launch drones against Russian territory, as evidenced by Russian MoD claims of 32 UAVs destroyed over Kursk and Orel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Emergency Services & PGO): Actively responding to and investigating the KAB strike on central Kharkiv, including documenting war crimes and providing assistance to dozens of injured civilians, now including two fatalities. Responding to KAB strike in Mezheva community. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Deep Strike):
  • Zelenskiy publicly confirmed the destruction of 3 Iskander-M launchers on 5 June. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Defense Forces of the South confirmed a successful strike on a Russian logistics train, destroying 13 tanks and over 100 other vehicles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • STERNENKO video confirms continued successful FPV drone strikes against Russian personnel. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Ukrainian SOF conducted a successful night raid against personnel of the 2nd Separate Special Purpose Brigade (GRV SpN) of the Russian GRU along the Sumy and Belgorod Oblasts border. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • This deep strike capability remains a significant operational tool and a source of Russian concern, as evidenced by the high number of UAVs claimed destroyed by Russia over Kursk and Orel Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Ground Forces - Defensive Operations): Ukrainian SOF and TD Brigades continue to engage Russian assault groups (previous ISR). Demonstrated capability to conduct precise strikes on fortified enemy positions (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС video showing building destruction by PGM). Intense fighting continues near Pokrovsk and now Konstantinovka directions. Ukrainian Marines (36th OBrMP) are actively employing FPV drones to interdict Russian personnel advances in Donbas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Forces (Medical/Rehabilitation): First Lady Olena Zelenska's visit to the Center of Vitality in Petrykivska community highlights continued focus on and provision of mental health and physical rehabilitation services. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Air): Confirmed continued KAB launches on Kharkiv, Sumy, and now Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Ongoing Shahed UAV threat in Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih directions, with new penetration into Kirovohrad Oblast. Russian milblogger "Colonelcassad" claims to show "something unknown and deadly for the hohols" (Ukrainians), which he "presumably" identifies as a North Korean Bulsae-4 multi-purpose guided missile, indicating potential new weapon systems or propaganda. (CONFIDENCE: LOW - Russian claim, unverified). Colonelcassad also posted video of a "Geran" (Shahed) drone attacking a target in Kharkiv Oblast. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - Visual evidence of drone).
• Russian Forces (Ground - Assaults): Russian milbloggers claim ambushing Ukrainian assault groups in Donbas, attempting to highlight successful defensive engagements. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM). Continued focus on Novopavlivka, Pokrovsk, and now Konstantinovka directions. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM). MoD Russia published a video showing 177th Separate Marine Regiment (Sever Group of Forces) training, indicating preparation for deployment to frontline. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Russian Special Forces (14th Sep Guards SpN) continue drone operations on Southern Donetsk direction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Russian Forces (Naval/Special Operations): Russian "Espanola" Marine Special Purpose Detachment demonstrates capabilities in maritime special operations, including fast boat insertions, subsurface sabotage, and drone reconnaissance, potentially targeting offshore infrastructure in the Black Sea. This highlights a multi-domain threat. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian propaganda, but visually credible capability demonstration). "Два майора" (Two Majors) confirmed Russian claims of "successful activities" in destroying "enemy infrastructure" on Black Sea offshore towers, reinforcing Russian maritime sabotage focus. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Russian Forces (Information Operations):
  • Internal Security/Counter-Sabotage: Colonelcassad reports the wife of a suspected participant in drone attacks on Russian airfields is on a wanted list. This confirms an active internal search for individuals involved in Ukrainian deep strikes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Russian MoD claims high number of drone interceptions over Kursk and Orel Oblasts, demonstrating a focus on publicizing counter-drone success. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Disinformation/Psychological Operations:
    • TASS and Colonelcassad continue the aggressive disinformation campaign claiming Ukraine refuses to accept bodies of its fallen soldiers, even publishing "lists" with future dates (06 JUN 2025), indicating deliberate fabrication. "Операция Z" (milblogger) amplified this campaign, publishing "lists" of identified Ukrainian soldiers whose bodies Kyiv allegedly refuses to retrieve. Analysis shows some lists are future-dated (e.g., 06 JUN 2025), confirming deliberate fabrication. Some lists mention military unit "в/ч 3202" associated with Russian personnel losses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - fabrication confirmed by future date; HIGH - coordinated disinformation campaign).
    • MoD Russia published a video showing an alleged AFU POW, Andriy Yevenko, claiming Ukrainian war crimes against civilians. This is a clear propaganda attempt to discredit Ukrainian forces. TASS reported POWs (from "Russia-24" broadcast) claiming they were promised exchange within three months but have been waiting for four years, suggesting a new narrative to demoralize Ukrainian forces and families. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
    • Russian milbloggers continue to portray Ukrainian soldiers as "boys who signed a contract for endless burgers," attempting to dehumanize and mock Ukrainian forces, particularly foreign volunteers, while claiming ambushes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
    • "Военкор Котенок" and "Операция Z" shared video of alleged Ukrainian casualties with English-language patches, likely to amplify narratives of foreign involvement and casualties. "Военкор Котенок" amplified the "body exchange" narrative, showing a photo of "Artem Olkhin" allegedly "imprisoned by the dead," connecting it to the exchange process. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - coordinated disinformation campaign).
    • Alex Parker Returns amplifies a sensationalized, unverified "Newsweek" claim about Elon Musk being beaten by the US Treasury Secretary, attributing it to a "yellow tabloid." TASS amplified this, linking it to potential SpaceX contract cancellations. This is a clear attempt to sow internal discord and portray Western figures negatively, likely for domestic consumption and to highlight Western "chaos." (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
    • "Новости Москвы" spreads disinformation about a "new deadly virus" in China, likely to divert attention or spread fear. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
    • Russian sources (ASTRA, Colonelcassad) immediately pick up and amplify the statement from the newly elected Polish President Karol Nawrocki expressing reservations about Ukraine's EU accession, aiming to sow discord between Ukraine and its key allies. RBC-Ukraine reported Nawrocki's opposition to accelerated EU entry. Colonelcassad further highlighted Nawrocki's statement, emphasizing his "against" stance while noting strategic support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
    • "Зона СВО" (milblogger) released a video claiming to show a Russian soldier with scissors "against FPV," likely an attempt to ridicule Ukrainian FPV drone threats or suggest improvised countermeasures. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - propaganda/low credibility).
    • Alex Parker Returns posted a video claiming the "original source of the complete destruction of a Ukrainian DRG," accompanied by "Be good!" (Быть добру!). This is likely propaganda celebrating claimed Russian successes and aiming to demoralize Ukrainian SOF. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA).
    • "Два майора" posted a video of a Russian military truck equipped with a "cope cage" or anti-drone screen, with a fundraising appeal. This serves to both acknowledge the drone threat and demonstrate Russian efforts to adapt and sustain operations, while also highlighting logistical shortfalls requiring public funding. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
    • Colonelcassad posted a video claiming to show "Military ingenuity of a Russian soldier" depicting a drone (likely Ukrainian) flying overhead and subsequent explosions in a forested area, serving as both propaganda for Russian resilience and an implicit warning of Ukrainian drone threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - propaganda value).
    • "Операция Z" released an FPV drone compilation video, explicitly showing drone strikes against buildings and personnel with derogatory terms ("piglets on retreat") and alleged Starlink destruction, aiming to demonstrate Russian FPV effectiveness and Ukrainian losses. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH - propaganda).
  • Damage Control: TASS reporting on the Pushkino fire focuses on "localization" rather than the initial severity (roof collapse, explosions), attempting to downplay the incident. ASTRA provides a more accurate scale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian Forces (Logistics): "Dnevnik Desantnika" crowdfunding request for DJI Mavic drones indicates persistent logistical shortfalls in the supply of critical reconnaissance/loitering munitions for Russian airborne (VDV) units. "Два майора" crowdfunding for "Frontline Armor" (cope cages for trucks) highlights a specific and widespread vulnerability (drones) and the need for improvised solutions outside regular supply chains. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

2. ENEMY ANALYSIS

2.1. Enemy Capabilities, Intentions, and Courses of Action:

• Capabilities:
  • Aerial (Precision Guided Munitions/UAVs): Confirmed continued capability to deliver KABs on civilian targets in Kharkiv (educational building, now 2 fatalities), Sumy Oblast, and now Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Mezheva community, kindergarten). Launch attack UAVs (Mykolaiv, Kryvyi Rih direction, now Kirovohrad Oblast) and reconnaissance drones (Poltava). This indicates sustained, though perhaps strained, munitions supply. New claim of North Korean Bulsae-4 missile deployment (unverified, but indicates potential new weapon system in propaganda). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH for KAB/UAV; LOW for Bulsae-4).
  • Ground (Offensive/Defensive): Demonstrated capability to conduct ground assaults and ambushes, particularly on the Donetsk axis (claims of ambushing Ukrainian groups, "fierce battles" near Pokrovsk, advances towards Konstantinovka). Russian Marine units (177th Sep Marine Regt) are training for frontline deployment, indicating continued readiness. Russian Special Forces (14th Sep Guards SpN) are actively employing drones for reconnaissance and targeting on the Southern Donetsk direction. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claim of BDA; HIGH - continued fighting).
  • Naval Special Operations: "Espanola" unit and "Два майора" claims demonstrate advanced maritime sabotage capabilities against offshore infrastructure. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - demonstrated capability for complex, multi-domain operations).
  • Information Warfare/Internal Security: Highly capable of coordinated and manipulative disinformation campaigns (body exchange, POWs, Western discord), actively hunting individuals involved in deep strikes, and attempting to control narratives around internal incidents (Pushkino fire). Rapid amplification of information designed to sow discord (Polish President's statement, fabricated POW testimonies, Musk/Trump narratives). Demonstrated capability to rapidly intercept large numbers of Ukrainian UAVs over border regions (Kursk, Orel). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Intentions:
  • Kharkiv/Sumy/Southern Ukraine/Central Ukraine: Continue to terrorize civilian populations and overwhelm emergency services through indiscriminate aerial attacks, particularly KABs and UAVs, likely in retaliation for Ukrainian deep strikes. Intent to inflict maximum psychological and physical damage by targeting non-military civilian sites (kindergarten, educational building). Expand the geographical scope of these attacks (Dnipropetrovsk, Kirovohrad). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Donetsk/Novopavlivka/Pokrovsk/Konstantinovka Axis: Continue localized ground offensives to achieve tactical gains and attrition against Ukrainian forces. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) MoD Russia's training video indicates intent to commit Marine units to these axes.
  • Black Sea/Maritime: Disrupt Ukrainian and international maritime logistics, potentially targeting energy infrastructure and vital shipping lanes, or demonstrating force projection and controlling information space around maritime activities. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - new intelligence from "Espanola" unit and "Два майора" claims).
  • Information Warfare: Aggressively undermine Ukrainian credibility (POW videos, body exchange narratives, mocking Ukrainian forces, Starlink destruction), exploit perceived Western failures/internal divisions (Musk/Trump, Polish EU accession), and demoralize Ukrainian forces. Reinforce domestic morale and project an image of Russian military success and internal control. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Internal Security: Actively pursue and neutralize individuals perceived as threats involved in deep strike attacks. Publicize successes in intercepting Ukrainian drones to demonstrate control and capability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Force Protection: Implement and fund countermeasures like "cope cages" to protect critical transport vehicles against drone threats. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Courses of Action (COA):
  • COA 1 (MLCOA - Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions): Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Odesa, and now Dnipropetrovsk/Kirovohrad, with an increased focus on civilian targets (kindergarten, educational buildings) to maximize terror and drain Ukrainian emergency resources. The immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv and ongoing UAV threats support this. Concurrently, Russia will continue a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges, blaming Ukraine for delays, and exploiting any perceived Western failures or internal divisions (e.g., US politics, Polish EU accession).
    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after previous strikes (now 2 fatalities), persistent Russian narrative on body exchange from multiple sources (TASS, Colonelcassad, MoD Russia, Операция Z, Военкор Котенок), Russian amplification of Zelenskiy's AD appeal, Alex Parker Returns's Musk/Trump narrative, amplification of Polish President's statement, new UAV threat in Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih directions and now Kirovohrad, KABs on Sumy Oblast and now Dnipropetrovsk.
  • COA 2 (Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Drone Strikes, while Enhancing Counter-Deep Strike Measures and Expanding Maritime Hybrid Operations): Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives on existing axes (e.g., Donetsk, Novopavlivka, Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka), supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS, and FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian positions and C2 nodes. They will likely enhance counter-drone and anti-artillery measures, and significantly increase internal security efforts to prevent and detect further Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory (e.g., Kursk, Orel). Additionally, Russia may expand hybrid maritime operations, including potential sabotage of critical infrastructure in the Black Sea or other maritime domains.
    • Confidence: HIGH
    • Indicators: Observed Grad MLRS firing (previous ISR), claimed Alexandropol strike on mortar/ammo depot (previous ISR), Russian milblogger claims of ambushing Ukrainian groups, active search for alleged drone attack participants, "Espanola" unit video demonstrating maritime sabotage, "Два майора" claims of successful Black Sea infrastructure destruction and "cope cage" fundraising. MoD Russia training video for Marines. Lipetsk/Kursk/Orel air alerts/interceptions. Russian SpN drone operations.

2.2. Recent Tactical Changes or Adaptations:

• Expansion of KAB Targeting: The confirmed KAB strike on Mezheva community in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast indicates a geographic expansion of Russian KAB usage beyond Kharkiv and Sumy, stretching Ukrainian AD resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Western UAV Penetration: UAVs moving into Kirovohrad Oblast represents a new, more westerly vector of Russian aerial reconnaissance and potential strike capability, indicating adapted flight paths to bypass existing AD. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Enhanced Counter-Deep Strike Internal Security: The reported search for the wife of an alleged drone attack participant and the publicized high number of UAV interceptions over Kursk and Orel indicate a heightened and more aggressive internal security posture aimed at disrupting Ukrainian deep strike capabilities and projecting an image of effective defense. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Refined Information Warfare Tactics: Russia is increasingly leveraging sensationalist, unverified Western news and internal Western political dynamics to create divisive narratives for internal consumption and external influence. The use of fabricated "future-dated" lists for body exchange propaganda is a new and significant adaptation. New POW testimony narrative about prolonged captivity aims to demoralize. Russian channels are increasingly using FPV drone compilations to showcase claimed successes and losses. "Cope cage" fundraising blends propaganda with actual logistical shortfall. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Demonstrated Maritime Sabotage Capability: The "Espanola" video and "Два майора" claims indicate a sophisticated capability for underwater sabotage and multi-domain maritime special operations, representing an expansion of Russian hybrid warfare tactics. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• Expanded ISR in Central Ukraine: Reconnaissance drone entering Poltava Oblast suggests an expansion of Russian aerial reconnaissance efforts beyond immediate frontlines. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Adaptation to Drone Threat: The "Два майора" fundraising for "cope cages" indicates a tactical adaptation by Russian forces to counter the prevalent threat of Ukrainian FPV and loitering munitions against ground vehicles. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.3. Logistics and Sustainment Status:

• Munitions: Continued high rate of KAB usage, MLRS firing, and FPV drone operations indicates sustained, though potentially strained, supply chains for these munitions. The confirmed destruction of a logistics train carrying 13 tanks and over 100 other vehicles represents a significant logistical setback for Russia in Southern Ukraine, impacting resupply and forward deployment. Crowdfunding for drones by Russian VDV units and "cope cages" for vehicles indicates ongoing shortfalls in certain critical equipment categories and reliance on volunteer support. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Fuel/Lubricants: The escalating Pushkino fire (PMM warehouse), covering over 20,000 sq meters, represents a severe, ongoing disruption to Russian internal logistics and strategic reserves. Though "localized" now, the scale and nature of the materials indicate a significant impact if not fully contained soon. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Strategic Missiles: The destruction of 3 Iskander launchers represents a significant hit to Russia's high-precision ballistic missile launch capability and inventory, potentially impacting future strategic strike options and forcing reliance on other platforms (e.g., KABs, cruise missiles from strategic bombers). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

2.4. Command and Control Effectiveness:

• Russian C2 demonstrates continued ability to coordinate multi-domain strikes (KABs, UAVs) and ground operations across multiple axes, including new targets (Dnipropetrovsk) and new penetration vectors (Kirovohrad). The coordinated disinformation campaign also highlights effective centralized C2 over information operations. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian C2 over internal security/emergency response is clearly challenged by the scale of the Pushkino fire and the ongoing search for individuals connected to deep strike attacks, suggesting a diversion of resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The successful Ukrainian deep strike on the logistics train indicates potential vulnerabilities in Russian logistics C2 and route security. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• The coordinated "Espanola" operation (if legitimate) and "Два майора" claims demonstrate effective C2 for complex maritime special operations, integrating naval, subsurface, and aerial assets. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
• The mention of specific military unit "в/ч 3202" in the Russian casualty lists published by "Операция Z" suggests a degree of internal record-keeping and potentially C2 issues if such sensitive information is being leaked or captured. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)

---

3. FRIENDLY FORCES

3.1. Ukrainian Force Posture and Readiness:

• Air Defense: Under severe pressure from continuous KABs (Kharkiv, Sumy, now Dnipropetrovsk) and UAV threats (Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih direction, now crossing Dnipro near Berislav and penetrating Kirovohrad Oblast). The continued need for AD systems (as highlighted by Zelenskiy) indicates a critical resource constraint and sustained high expenditure of AD munitions. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Ukrainian forces maintain deep strike capability against Russian airfields and border regions, necessitating Russian AD responses (32 UAVs claimed destroyed). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Services & PGO: Operating at high readiness to respond to civilian casualties and infrastructure damage, particularly in Kharkiv (now with 2 fatalities) and Mezheva, and are actively documenting war crimes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Deep Strike Capability: Demonstrated continued strategic capability by confirming the destruction of 3 Iskander-M launchers and a major logistics train. Confirmed successful FPV drone strikes against personnel. Successful night raid by SOF against GRU personnel on the Sumy/Belgorod border. This capability remains a significant operational asset for interdicting Russian logistics and degrading high-value targets. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ground Forces: Demonstrated rapid action and successful engagement (Operational ZSU video in previous ISR). Ukrainian SOF and TD Brigades are actively engaging Russian assault groups and conducting precise strikes against fortified positions. Intense fighting reported in Pokrovsk and now Konstantinovka directions. Ukrainian Marines (36th OBrMP) are actively employing FPV drones effectively in Donbas. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical/Rehabilitation Services: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro highlights ongoing commitment and readiness to provide mental health and physical rehabilitation for war-wounded, indicating long-term resilience efforts. Public memorials highlight individual losses but also resilience and recognition. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Leadership Communications: President Zelenskiy's public address directly addressing the Kharkiv strikes and the urgent need for AD systems demonstrates transparency and sustained leadership focus. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.2. Recent Tactical Successes or Setbacks:

• Successes:
  • Confirmed Destruction of 3 Iskander Launchers: Zelenskiy's statement confirms the destruction of three critical Russian ballistic missile launchers, directly impacting their strike capability. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Major Logistics Interdiction: Successful strike on a Russian logistics train, destroying 13 tanks and over 100 vehicles, significantly disrupting Russian resupply in the south. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Continued Deep Strike Pressure: Drone safety warnings in multiple Russian oblasts (e.g., Lipetsk, Kursk, Orel) and the active search for alleged drone attack participants indicate sustained Ukrainian deep strike activity, forcing Russia to dedicate resources to internal defense. Effective FPV drone strikes on personnel. Successful SOF night raid against GRU personnel on border. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Successful Ground Engagement: Precise destruction of a fortified building by PGM (БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС video) demonstrates effective targeting and munition use. 36th OBrMP FPV drone strikes on Russian personnel are highly effective. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Rehabilitation Infrastructure Expansion: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro highlights the ongoing development of critical rehabilitation infrastructure for war-wounded. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Setbacks:
  • Increased Civilian Casualties and Geographic Expansion of KAB Attacks: Another KAB strike on central Kharkiv (educational building) resulted in 2 fatalities and 19 injured, adding to the growing civilian toll. KABs are now also targeting Sumy Oblast and Dnipropetrovsk Oblast (Mezheva community, kindergarten, 1 fatality). Attacks on Kherson Oblast also resulted in civilian fatality. This demonstrates continued Russian intent to terrorize urban populations and overwhelm emergency services across a wider AOR. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Persistent AD Shortfall: Zelenskiy's public statement about awaiting a US response for AD systems highlights a critical unmet need that exacerbates the impact of Russian air attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • New UAV Threat Direction: Shahed UAVs crossing Dnipro near Berislav indicates a new vector of attack into Mykolaiv Oblast, requiring AD reallocation. Reconnaissance drone in Poltava indicates expanded Russian ISR. New UAV penetration into Kirovohrad Oblast is the furthest west of recent drone activity. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Russian Claims of Ambush/Casualties: Russian claims of ambushing Ukrainian assault groups (with video evidence of casualties) indicate continued high-intensity fighting and losses on the battlefield. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM - Russian claims, but video corroborates engagement). "Fierce battles" near Pokrovsk and advances towards Konstantinovka also indicate high attrition. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH) Russian milblogger video claiming "complete destruction of a Ukrainian DRG" likely points to successful Russian engagements. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM).
  • Information Warfare Impact: Russian disinformation (body exchanges, Musk/Trump narratives, mockery of volunteers, fabricated POW testimonials, exploitation of Polish EU accession statements) is being aggressively amplified by high-level Russian officials and milbloggers, creating a challenging information environment for Ukraine. The "future-dated" body lists are particularly insidious. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

3.3. Resource Requirements and Constraints:

• Air Defense Munitions & Systems: Continued high expenditure due to persistent aerial attacks, particularly KABs and massed drone assaults (new threat vector via Berislav, Kryvyi Rih, Kirovohrad). Zelenskiy's public statement reinforces the urgent need for additional AD systems and sustained resupply from international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Emergency Response Resources: Severe strain on emergency and medical services in Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, and other targeted urban centers due to increased casualties and widespread damage. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Medical & Rehabilitation Support: The need for mental health and physical rehabilitation services for war-wounded personnel and civilians is significant and ongoing, requiring sustained resources. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Counter-Disinformation Capability: Urgent need for robust, proactive, and coordinated counter-information campaigns to neutralize aggressive Russian disinformation tactics, especially fabricated POW videos, "future-dated" lists, and narratives designed to sow discord with allies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Counter-UAV Capabilities: Continued need for robust electronic warfare (EW) and counter-UAV (C-UAV) systems to disrupt and neutralize Russian FPV drones (as evidenced by Russian effectiveness with these systems and the need to counter Russian reconnaissance drones (Poltava, Kirovohrad)). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

4. INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT

4.1. Propaganda and Disinformation Campaigns:

• Russian Propaganda (Internal & External):
  • Body Exchange Disinformation: Remains a primary, aggressive campaign by high-level officials (TASS, Colonelcassad, Операция Z, Военкор Котенок) and state media to portray Ukraine as inhumane and inflate casualty figures. The use of "future-dated" lists (06 JUN 2025) is a clear and verifiable fabrication designed to confuse and mislead. This is being amplified with emotional appeals (e.g., "imprisoned by the dead"). (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Exploiting Ukrainian AD Shortfalls: Russian channels continue to use Zelenskiy's public appeal for AD systems to portray Ukraine as desperate and unsupported. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Discrediting Western Leaders/Internal Divisions: The amplification of fabricated stories about Elon Musk and US officials (Alex Parker Returns, TASS) demonstrates a clear intent to sow discord and discredit Western leadership, likely aimed at undermining public confidence and unity in the West. Immediate amplification of the Polish President's reservations on Ukraine's EU accession is a highly effective attempt to drive wedges between Ukraine and key allies. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Demoralizing Ukrainian Forces/Glorifying Russian Successes: Russian milbloggers continue to share videos of alleged Ukrainian casualties and ambushes, often with derogatory captions (e.g., "boys who signed a contract for endless burgers," "piglets on retreat"), to demoralize Ukrainian forces and boost Russian domestic morale. MoD Russia publishes a video of an alleged AFU POW making claims of Ukrainian war crimes, a classic propaganda tactic. New POW testimony about prolonged captivity further reinforces demoralization efforts. Claims of "complete destruction of a Ukrainian DRG" are part of this. FPV drone compilation videos (Операция Z) aim to showcase Russian effectiveness and Ukrainian losses, including alleged Starlink destruction. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Justifying Civilian Strikes: Russian sources continue to frame strikes on Kharkiv and now Mezheva (Dnipropetrovsk) as targeting "enemy targets" despite clear civilian impact. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Spreading Fear/Distraction: "Новости Москвы" spreading false information about a new deadly virus in China is a likely attempt to divert attention or induce panic. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Weapon System Exaggeration: Claim of North Korean Bulsae-4 missile deployment (Colonelcassad) is likely designed to project increased Russian military capability or hint at new strategic partnerships. (CONFIDENCE: LOW)
  • Ridicule/Discredit Ukrainian Capabilities: The "scissors against FPV" video is an attempt to ridicule Ukrainian drone capabilities. Colonelcassad's "Military ingenuity of a Russian soldier" video attempts to frame Russian resilience against drone threats. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Maritime Operations Narrative Control: "Два майора" actively claiming successful destruction of "enemy infrastructure" on Black Sea platforms aims to control the narrative around Russian maritime operations and assert dominance. (CONFIDENCE: MEDIUM)
  • Crowdfunding as Propaganda: "Два майора" fundraising for "cope cages" on military trucks is a dual-purpose message: acknowledging the drone threat while demonstrating collective effort and adaptation. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Publicizing Interceptions: Russian MoD publicizing high numbers of intercepted Ukrainian UAVs over Russian territory aims to project a strong defensive capability and reassure the domestic population. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Ukrainian Counter-Propaganda/Information Operations:
  • Transparency on Russian Atrocities: Ukrainian officials (PGO, local administrations, Zelenskiy) and media continue to immediately report on KAB strikes on civilian areas in Kharkiv (now 2 fatalities), Mezheva (Dnipropetrovsk, 1 fatality), and Kherson (1 fatality), providing real-time evidence of civilian casualties and documenting war crimes. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Highlighting Strategic Successes: Zelenskiy's public confirmation of 3 Iskander launcher destructions and the reporting of the destroyed logistics train are powerful information operations, demonstrating advanced capabilities and directly refuting Russian military invulnerability. FPV drone videos demonstrating successful strikes (e.g., 36th OBrMP) also serve this purpose. Successful SOF raid is a key counter-narrative. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Showcasing Resilience & Care: Olena Zelenska's visit to Dnipro rehabilitation centers provides a powerful counter-narrative of Ukrainian resilience, commitment to its people, and long-term planning, contrasting with Russian narratives of Ukrainian collapse. Memorials for fallen soldiers, including those from the LGBT+ community, reinforce national unity and shared sacrifice. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
  • Direct Appeals for Aid: Zelenskiy's direct appeals for AD systems maintain international pressure and transparency on critical needs. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.2. Public Sentiment and Morale Factors:

• Negative Impact: The continued KAB strikes on Kharkiv, with new civilian casualties and now 2 fatalities, and the expansion to Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts, will severely impact civilian morale, particularly given the explicit targeting of non-military areas (kindergarten, educational building). The persistent AD shortfall highlighted by Zelenskiy's statement may also cause anxiety about protection. Russian propaganda attempts to divide (e.g., via Polish relations) or spread fear (virus narrative) could cause public anxiety and distrust. Fabricated body lists and POW testimony are particularly damaging to morale. The new, deeper UAV penetrations (Kirovohrad) may also increase anxiety about the reach of Russian attacks. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Positive Impact: The confirmation of 3 Iskander launcher destructions and the major logistics interdiction are significant morale boosts for Ukrainian forces and the population, demonstrating a concrete ability to strike back at Russian strategic assets. Continued deep strike activity in Russian territory (e.g., Kursk/Orel alerts) will reinforce this. Efforts in rehabilitation also contribute positively to overall societal morale. Recognition of fallen soldiers through public memorials reinforces national unity and shared sacrifice. Successful tactical FPV drone strikes by units like the 36th OBrMP will boost frontline morale. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Information Warfare Impact: The aggressive Russian disinformation regarding body exchanges, fabricated POW videos, and Western internal divisions could cause significant emotional distress and distrust among Ukrainian families and the general public if not effectively countered. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

4.3. International Support and Diplomatic Developments:

• The confirmed destruction of 3 Iskander launchers, the major logistics interdiction, and continued Ukrainian deep strike activity will likely underscore Ukraine's need for continued long-range strike capabilities and air defense systems to international partners. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)
• Russian disinformation on body exchanges and attempts to exploit Western internal divisions (including the Polish President's statement on EU accession, Musk/Trump narratives) aim to undermine international trust in Ukraine and the coherence of support. However, the clear and verifiable targeting of civilians in Kharkiv, Sumy, and Dnipropetrovsk, and the blatant fabrication in Russian propaganda (e.g., future-dated lists) provide a strong counter-narrative, likely solidifying international condemnation of Russia and calls for continued support for Ukraine. Zelenskiy's direct appeal to the US for AD systems maintains pressure on key allies. The amplification of the Polish President's statement by Russian media is a direct attempt to undermine EU unity on Ukraine's accession. (CONFIDENCE: HIGH)

---

5. PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

5.1. Most Likely Enemy Courses of Action (MLCOA):

• MLCOA 1: Sustained and Escalated Retaliatory Saturation Attacks on Urban Centers and Critical Infrastructure, Coupled with Amplified Disinformation on Humanitarian Issues and Western Divisions: Russia will continue and likely intensify KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Ukrainian urban centers, particularly Kharkiv, Sumy, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipropetrovsk, and potentially extend deeper into central Ukraine (e.g., Kirovohrad, Poltava). The explicit focus will remain on civilian targets (kindergartens, educational buildings) to maximize terror, drain Ukrainian emergency resources, and retaliate for successful Ukrainian deep strikes. This will be accompanied by a persistent and aggressive information campaign, particularly regarding body/POW exchanges (using fabricated evidence), blaming Ukraine for delays, and exploiting any perceived Western failures or internal divisions (e.g., US politics, Polish EU accession).

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Immediate KAB strike on central Kharkiv after previous strikes (now 2 fatalities), persistent Russian narrative on body exchange from multiple sources (TASS, Colonelcassad, MoD Russia, Операция Z, Военкор Котенок), Russian amplification of Zelenskiy's AD appeal, Alex Parker Returns's Musk/Trump narrative, amplification of Polish President's statement, new UAV threat in Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih directions and now Kirovohrad, KABs on Sumy Oblast and now Dnipropetrovsk.

• MLCOA 2: Ground Offensive Support with Targeted Artillery/MLRS and Drone Strikes, while Enhancing Counter-Deep Strike Internal Security and Expanding Maritime Hybrid Operations: Russian forces will continue to press ground offensives on existing axes (e.g., Donetsk, Novopavlivka, Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka), supporting them with targeted artillery, MLRS, and FPV drone strikes against Ukrainian positions and C2 nodes. They will likely intensify internal security efforts to prevent and detect further Ukrainian deep strikes on Russian territory, including targeting family members of alleged participants, and maintaining and publicizing air defense alerts/interceptions in border regions (Kursk, Orel). Additionally, Russia will likely attempt to conduct further hybrid maritime operations in the Black Sea, targeting critical offshore or coastal infrastructure, or demonstrating force projection in the maritime domain. Russian forces will continue to adapt ground vehicles with "cope cages" and similar improvised defenses against drones.

  • Confidence: HIGH
  • Indicators: Observed Grad MLRS firing (previous ISR), claimed Alexandropol strike on mortar/ammo depot (previous ISR), Russian milblogger claims of ambushing Ukrainian groups, active search for alleged drone attack participants (Colonelcassad), "Espanola" unit video demonstrating maritime sabotage, "Два майора" claims of successful Black Sea infrastructure destruction and "cope cage" fundraising. MoD Russia training video for Marines. Lipetsk/Kursk/Orel air alerts/interceptions. Russian SpN drone operations.

5.2. Most Dangerous Enemy Courses of Action (MDCOA):

• MDCOA 1: Renewed Large-Scale Ballistic/Cruise Missile Campaign to Cripple Ukrainian AD and Energy/Logistics Infrastructure: Russia, despite Iskander losses, will attempt to launch a renewed, multi-wave missile and drone campaign targeting Ukraine's critical national infrastructure (energy, logistics hubs, and remaining high-value military facilities), with a specific emphasis on overwhelming weakened Ukrainian air defenses. This aims to exhaust their munition reserves and cripple Ukraine's ability to sustain military operations and civilian life, especially ahead of the colder months. This MDCOA would exploit the publicly stated AD procurement challenges and the confirmed losses of Ukrainian AD munitions. The expansion of KAB attacks and UAV routes signals a probing for AD weaknesses.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Increased due to Zelenskiy's public statement about AD procurement, the strategic impact of losing 3 Iskander launchers and the Tu-22M3 bomber, prompting Russia to consider other high-impact strike options and rely more on existing cruise missile stocks. New KAB targets and UAV penetration routes also indicate this.)
  • Indicators: Significant increase in missile/drone attacks beyond current levels, targeting of energy infrastructure components not previously hit, significant increase in Russian strategic bomber activity, increased Russian reconnaissance efforts over critical infrastructure.

• MDCOA 2: Attempted Strategic Breakthrough on Sumy Axis with Major Force Commitment and Massed Air Support: Russia commits substantial additional reserves to the Sumy axis, initiating a rapid, decisive breakthrough aimed at encircling or seizing Sumy city. This would involve overwhelming combined arms force, massed KAB strikes to suppress Ukrainian defenses, and deep strikes to neutralize Ukrainian command and control and logistics in the region. This would aim to open a new major operational front, fix a large portion of Ukrainian reserves, and create a significant humanitarian crisis, diverting resources from the Donbas.

  • Confidence: MEDIUM (Based on previous Russian claims of "buffer zone" and mapped territorial control, reinforced by confirmed advances towards Sumy Oblast from previous ISR and the presence of Sumy in Russian casualty lists from memorials. The SOF night raid in the Sumy/Belgorod border area indicates active Russian presence and Ukrainian counter-operations.)
  • Indicators: Sustained high rate of KABs and missile strikes on deep targets in Sumy Oblast, large-scale troop movements on Sumy axis beyond current levels, intelligence of Russian force restructuring or redeployment from other axes.

5.3. Timeline Estimates and Decision Points:

• Next 24-48 Hours (Short-Term):

  • Immediate Retaliation/Sustained Attacks: Expect continued, possibly intensified, KAB and missile/UAV strikes on Kharkiv, Sumy, Zaporizhzhia, Mykolaiv, Odesa, and now Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts. High probability of further Russian retaliatory deep strikes due to the Iskander and logistics train losses. New UAV threat in Mykolaiv/Kryvyi Rih regions, and reconnaissance drone activity in Poltava and Kirovohrad.
  • Ground Pressure: Continued tactical ground engagements, particularly on the Donetsk (Pokrovsk, Konstantinovka) and Sumy axes, with Russian efforts to consolidate claimed gains. Increased Russian counter-drone and anti-AD operations.
  • Decision Point (UKR): Prioritize air defense assets to protect key urban centers (Kharkiv, Sumy, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipro, Kryvyi Rih, Poltava, Kirovohrad) and critical infrastructure. Expedite deployment of countermeasures to Russian anti-drone tactics. Reassess ground force posture on the Sumy axis based on updated Russian advances and map intelligence. Immediately counter Russian disinformation on body exchanges, POW testimonies, and Western internal politics (especially Polish relations) with factual and transparent communication.

• Next 72 Hours (Medium-Term):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the full impact of the Iskander launcher and logistics train destruction on Russian operational tempo and strategic options. Re-evaluate and adapt ground force deployments on the Sumy axis based on continued Russian advances and the scale of the threat to Sumy city, potentially deploying additional reserves. Develop a comprehensive plan for mine clearance and public safety in areas affected by PFM-1 mines (as reported in previous ISR). Expedite high-level diplomatic engagement regarding AD systems. Monitor and respond to escalating Russian disinformation campaigns targeting Western unity and Ukrainian credibility, particularly the fabricated POW videos and body lists.

• Next 1 Week (Near-Term Strategic):

  • Decision Point (UKR): Evaluate the overall effectiveness of Ukrainian deep strike campaign on Russian military-industrial complex and logistics, considering both successes and Russian claims of countermeasures. Continue to optimize air defense deployments based on evolving Russian targeting patterns and replenish munition stockpiles. Intensify intelligence collection on Russian strategic aviation, air defense assets, potential dispersal efforts, and maritime special operations (e.g., "Espanola" unit, "Два майора" activities). Prioritize resources for the Sumy axis if Russian pressure continues, potentially initiating pre-emptive civilian evacuation planning. Reinforce maritime security measures in the Black Sea and Azov Sea.

---

6. ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Prioritize and Augment Air Defense for Eastern, Southern, and Central Urban Centers (Immediate & Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately re-prioritize and reinforce layered air defense systems (including mobile fire groups with MANPADS for KAB and drone defense) to protect Kharkiv, Sumy, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Dnipro, Kryvyi Rih, Poltava, and Kirovohrad from continued KAB and missile/UAV attacks. Deploy active and passive defenses around critical civilian infrastructure, particularly educational buildings and kindergartens. Expedite diplomatic efforts for the acquisition of additional advanced AD systems (e.g., Patriot, NASAMS) and secure urgent resupply of interceptor munitions. Allocate AD assets to counter new UAV threat vectors from Berislav into Mykolaiv/Kirovohrad Oblasts and reconnaissance drones into Poltava.
   • Justification: Russian forces are deliberately escalating attacks on civilian areas and opening new attack vectors to inflict casualties and psychological impact. The latest KAB strike on a central Kharkiv educational building (now 2 fatalities), KABs on Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk Oblasts (Mezheva community, kindergarten, 1 fatality), and ongoing UAV threats into Kirovohrad underscore the urgency and breadth of the threat.
   • Intelligence Gap: Real-time air defense munition expenditure rates in affected areas and current inventory levels for key systems; full extent of Russian UAV reconnaissance and strike capabilities in the Mykolaiv/Odesa/Poltava/Kirovohrad sectors.
   • Collection Requirement: Automated tracking of AD engagements and munition usage, updated imagery of damaged civilian sites for munition analysis, SIGINT/HUMINT on AD system readiness, drone flight path analysis from Mykolaiv/Poltava/Kirovohrad Oblasts.

2. Sustain and Exploit Deep Strike Successes, Prepare for Retaliation (Urgent):

   • Action: Conduct rapid, detailed BDA on the destroyed Iskander launchers, the logistics train, and the Tu-22M3 bomber (satellite imagery, OSINT analysis) to confirm operational impact and specific targets. Publicize these successes widely to boost morale and demonstrate capability. Simultaneously, prepare for heightened Russian retaliatory strikes across Ukraine, particularly on strategic infrastructure, following these high-value asset destructions. Disperse high-value assets and reinforce their defenses. Continue to assess targets for further deep strikes on Russian logistics and military-industrial complex. Integrate FPV drone operations more widely for precision strikes on personnel and high-value equipment (e.g., 36th OBrMP tactics). Leverage SOF for continued cross-border raids against high-value Russian personnel and forward operating bases. Monitor and adapt to Russian counter-drone measures like "cope cages."
   • Justification: Ukrainian deep strikes are a significant strategic success but will provoke severe retaliation, requiring preemptive defensive measures and effective information operations. The destruction of a logistics train highlights a key vulnerability, and the VDV crowdfunding indicates systemic issues. SOF raids maintain pressure on Russian border regions. Russian attempts to adapt to drone threats must be countered.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full BDA and long-term operational impact on Russian ballistic missile capabilities, Southern logistics, and strategic aviation. Specific details on the GRU personnel targeted in the SOF raid. Effectiveness of Russian counter-drone adaptations (e.g., "cope cages").
   • Collection Requirement: High-resolution satellite imagery of Bryansk/Kursk missile sites, Southern logistics hubs, Russian airfields (especially Engels, Belaya, Dyagilevo), and other military-industrial targets; monitoring Russian strategic aviation movements and activity. HUMINT/SIGINT on Russian GRU force composition and deployment on the border. IMINT/OSINT on Russian vehicle adaptations and their effectiveness.

3. Intensify Counter-Information Warfare on Humanitarian Issues, Western Divisions, and Russian Fabrications (Ongoing & Critical):

   • Action: Proactively and transparently communicate Ukraine's official stance and actions regarding prisoner and body exchanges to both domestic and international audiences, providing verifiable evidence and consistently refuting Russian disinformation. Immediately and publicly expose Russian fabrications, such as the "future-dated" body lists (e.g., 06 JUN 2025) and the alleged POW video from MoD Russia, highlighting their manipulative nature and the intent to demoralize. Highlight Russian violations of international law (e.g., confirmed KAB strikes on children's railway, central Kharkiv educational building, kindergarten in Mezheva, PFM-1 mine use) to discredit their humanitarian claims. Publicly counter Russian narratives attempting to exploit Western internal politics (e.g., Musk/Trump claims) and international relations (e.g., Polish EU accession statements), exposing them as deliberate psychological operations. Leverage the opening of rehabilitation centers to showcase Ukrainian commitment to its people and support for its diverse military.
   • Justification: Russia is leveraging highly sensitive humanitarian issues, internal Western political dynamics, and sensationalist narratives for information warfare, using increasingly blatant fabrications (e.g., "future-dated" lists, fabricated POW testimonials) aiming to undermine Ukrainian credibility, international support, and Western unity. Effective, consistent counter-narratives are critical.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full scope of Russian information narratives targeting Ukrainian society and Western audiences, and the specific impact of Russian propaganda on Ukrainian public and troop morale. Identification of key Russian psychological operations (PSYOP) themes.
   • Collection Requirement: Comprehensive monitoring of Russian state media and milblogger channels, and analysis of their messaging tactics and impact, coupled with public opinion polling in Ukraine and Western nations. OSINT analysis of specific Russian PSYOP channels and their reach.

4. Reinforce and Monitor Sumy and Konstantinovka Axis Defenses (Urgent):

   • Action: Immediately reinforce personnel, fortifications (including anti-tank obstacles), and anti-tank capabilities on the Sumy axis, prioritizing areas within 40km of Sumy city and identified Russian avenues of advance (e.g., around Yablonovka, Andreevka, Vorochina). Intensify ISR collection on Russian force composition, strength, and objectives in the area. Advise civilian authorities on potential evacuation routes and shelter options in Sumy City and surrounding settlements. Conduct aggressive counter-battery fire against Russian artillery/MLRS supporting advances. Similarly, reinforce defenses and conduct ISR on the Konstantinovka axis, given Russian claims of advances.
   • Justification: Russian claims of an "expanding buffer zone" and confirmed advances (including mapped territorial control) indicate a serious intent to press the Sumy axis, threatening Sumy City. The continued focus on the Novopavlivka and Pokrovsk directions, and new claims on Konstantinovka, also indicate sustained pressure on ground forces. The SOF raid highlights active Russian presence in the border region.
   • Intelligence Gap: Precise composition and strength of Russian forces on Sumy and Konstantinovka axes, and their immediate operational objectives and timeline for further advance.
   • Collection Requirement: HUMINT from local sources, SIGINT on Russian communications, IMINT for troop movements and fortifications, cross-referencing Russian map claims with ground truth.

5. Enhance Maritime Security in the Black Sea (New & Critical):

   • Action: Increase Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) in areas with critical maritime infrastructure (ports, offshore platforms, key shipping lanes) in the Black Sea, particularly off Odesa, Mykolaiv, and the Ukrainian coast. Develop and deploy enhanced physical and electronic security measures for offshore platforms, subsea cables, and pipelines (e.g., anti-diver, anti-drone, and rapid response capabilities). Share intelligence on Russian maritime special operations (e.g., "Espanola" unit's TTPs, "Два майора" claims) with relevant maritime security agencies and allied nations. Prioritize monitoring of specific offshore platforms for signs of Russian activity.
   • Justification: The "Espanola" unit's video and "Два майора" claims demonstrate a sophisticated Russian capability for maritime sabotage against critical energy infrastructure, posing a significant threat to Ukrainian and international interests in the Black Sea.
   • Intelligence Gap: Full understanding of "Espanola" unit's capabilities, specific targets, operational areas, and force structure. Precise location and function of the "infrastructure" claimed destroyed by "Два майора."
   • Collection Requirement: IMINT/OSINT on Russian naval special forces units, SIGINT on their communications, HUMINT from Black Sea region, commercial satellite imagery of offshore infrastructure for BDA and pattern of life analysis.

---

END REPORT