Nightwatch logo
'Nightwatch' text with white and gray letters
Historical Intelligence

Situation Report

Archived operational intelligence briefing

Report Time
2025-05-03 09:18:50Z
9 months ago
Previous (2025-05-03 08:48:49Z)

Operational Intelligence Briefing - Major Updates and Analysis (May 3, 2025, 09:18 UTC)


Updated Situation

The operational picture remains complex, characterized by sustained intense ground combat on key axes, widespread Russian aerial attacks with significant humanitarian consequences, and evolving Ukrainian deep strike capabilities, particularly in the Black Sea region. New information reinforces previous reports on the scale and impact of Russian drone and missile activity, provides additional detail on Ukrainian deep strikes and their effects, and offers insight into the tactical situation on specific fronts. Internal Russian dynamics, including issues of military discipline and logistics, continue to be highlighted, while diplomatic maneuvering around potential peace negotiations and future Western support remains a significant factor. Information operations and propaganda efforts from both sides are pervasive. Concerns regarding internal Russian military issues and the potential for future Ukrainian deep strikes remain high.

Key updates and analysis:

  • Continued High-Intensity Ground Combat with Localized Russian Advances: The intensity of ground combat remains high across multiple axes, with the Ukrainian General Staff reporting 83 combat engagements on the Pokrovsk direction in the last 24 hours (as of the previous update). Russian sources continue to claim localized tactical successes. Colonelcassad shares video claiming successful FPV drone strikes by the "Center" group of forces on enemy equipment and fortifications on the Krasnoarmeyske direction, by the "South" group near Dyleevka against armored vehicles, and by the "Vostok" group near Bogatyr against a MaxxPro armored personnel carrier and personnel. This aligns with previous reports of Russian FPV drone effectiveness and highlights active combat in these areas. "Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны" reports on a successful ambush by fighters of the 255th regiment on Ukrainian armored vehicles and infantry on the Mirnohradsk direction, utilizing mines followed by drone strikes on the remaining personnel. This details a specific tactical engagement and claimed Russian success. "Сливочный каприз" reports active combat near Kurakhove and Bogatyr, claiming a Russian infantry attack on Bogatyr with a claimed advance of up to 600 meters into the eastern outskirts of the settlement, providing a geolocation for the claimed advance. This provides more specific, albeit unverified, detail on Russian tactical gains. "Воин DV" reports on successful actions by snipers of the 37th separate guards motorized rifle brigade on the Southern Donetsk direction against Ukrainian personnel in a tree line, indicating ongoing small-unit engagements on this front. Liveuamap, citing the Ukrainian General Staff, reports six combat engagements on the Kharkiv axis yesterday near Vovchansk and Kamyanka, indicating ongoing but potentially less intense activity compared to other fronts. Liveuamap, citing the Ukrainian General Staff, reports six attacks by occupiers on the Kupyansk axis yesterday near Kolisnykivka, Nova Kruhlyakivka, and Zahryzove, which were repelled by Ukrainian forces, indicating continued Russian pressure but successful Ukrainian defense in this area. Liveuamap, citing the Ukrainian General Staff, reports 27 enemy attacks on the Lyman axis yesterday near Nove, Zelena Dolyna, Kolodyazi, Myrne, Serhiyivka, Hrekivka, and Kopanky, where the enemy attempted to advance, highlighting sustained Russian efforts on this front. Liveuamap, citing the Ukrainian General Staff, reports that Ukrainian defense forces repelled one assault by enemy troops on the Siversk axis yesterday in the area of Bilohorivka, indicating limited but ongoing Russian activity on this front. Liveuamap, citing the Ukrainian General Staff, reports Russian aviation conducted airstrikes at Turya and Mala Rybytsya of Sumy region, Tsapivka, Velyki Prokhody, Dementiyivka, Odradne of Kharkiv region, Shakhove, Novoekonomichne, Poltavka, Malynivka, Nova Poltavka, Hnativka, Pokrovsk, Novoserhiyivka, Udachne, Novopavlivka, Novopil of Donetsk region, Hulyaypole, Mali Scherbaka, Novoandriyivka of Zaporizhzhia region, highlighting widespread Russian aerial support for ground operations and strikes on various locations.
  • Escalating Humanitarian Impact of Russian Aerial Attacks: The number of civilians injured in Kharkiv following recent Russian drone attacks has tragically risen to 51, including two girls aged 11 and 16. This underscores the severe humanitarian impact of continued Russian aerial assaults on urban areas. The use of thermobaric warheads in Kharkiv indicates a deliberate choice of ordnance likely intended to maximize damage and casualties. In Zaporizhzhia, the number of injured from the May 2nd attack is confirmed at 33. Олексій Білошицький shares graphic video footage from Zaporizhzhia showing the aftermath of a massive enemy drone attack on May 1st, depicting destroyed buildings and injured people, further illustrating the severe humanitarian consequences of these attacks and the work of emergency services. РБК-Україна reports that the Russian army conducted an airstrike on Sumy Oblast overnight, damaging infrastructure, residential buildings, an educational institution, social facilities, and cars, although preliminary reports indicate no casualties, highlighting the continued targeting of civilian infrastructure in various regions.
  • Significant Combined Ukrainian Unmanned and Missile Attack on Crimea and Novorossiysk and Russian Countermeasures: Multiple sources confirm a large-scale Ukrainian UAV, unmanned boat, and missile attack on occupied Crimea and Novorossiysk overnight. The Russian Ministry of Defense claims to have destroyed a high number of Ukrainian drones (totaling 170 over regions of Russia, with 96 over Crimea and 47 over Krasnodar Krai), 8 Storm Shadow and 3 Neptune-MD missiles over the Black Sea, and 14 Ukrainian unmanned boats in the Black Sea. Alex Parker Returns acknowledges the massive drone attack on Crimea, Anapa, and Novorossiysk overnight, linking it to upcoming Russian political events. "Оперативний ЗСУ" shares a message claiming a naval drone shot down an enemy Su-30 in the "NovorossSSiysk direction", further supporting the report from the previous update regarding a claimed hit on a Russian aircraft by a Ukrainian naval drone, and providing a location. Два майора share video claiming to show the preparation of a reconnaissance drone by the Naval Spetsnaz detachment in Crimea overnight, stating that successful work by operators helped guide their FPV drones to enemy unmanned boats, which were reportedly attempting to fire on Russian positions, and emphasizes the coordinated effort of various units in defending Crimea, while also noting that the enemy gained experience in the naval drone battle and the continued threat of "sleeping" unmanned boats. STERNENKO echoes the report of a Russian Su-30 being shot down by a Ukrainian naval drone, framing it from a Ukrainian perspective. Два майора shares video claiming to show objective control footage of their Naval Spetsnaz detachment destroying four enemy unmanned boats (three confirmed hits by their FPV drones and one explosion from a fourth with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead), attributing success to joint efforts in defending the Crimean coast, but again noting the enemy's gained experience in this type of warfare. Басурин о главном provides a detailed Russian perspective on the Ukrainian attacks over the past two days, stating that Ukraine is trying to establish control over the Black Sea, listing claimed numbers of intercepted drones (over 200 towards Crimea, 96 over Crimea last night, over 50 near Sevastopol previously, 47 over Krasnodar Krai last night), missiles (8 Storm Shadow, 3 Neptune-MD over the Black Sea), and unmanned boats (14 destroyed), confirming significant damage to infrastructure in Novorossiysk (eight apartments in two multi-story buildings, five injured including two children), and citing an expert who believes these attacks, which started as single incidents, could escalate and pose a direct threat to the security of the Crimean Peninsula, also mentioning drone attacks on Rostov, Bryansk, Kursk, Belgorod, Kherson, and frontline areas of the DPR, with over 45 drones attacking Belgorod, damaging civilian agricultural enterprises and a trade object, and reporting injuries to 8 Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations employees from a kamikaze drone while extinguishing a fire in Horlivka, DPR, who were attacking a damaged headquarters vehicle, and an earlier attack on a Horlivka bus. This comprehensive report from a Russian source confirms the widespread nature of the Ukrainian deep strike, provides details on claimed interceptions and damage, highlights the perceived threat to Crimea, and links the attacks to broader Ukrainian efforts to gain Black Sea control. Janus Putkonen attributes the long-range drone attacks on Novorossiysk and Crimea to "terrorist state Ukraine," stating that residential buildings were targeted in Novorossiysk and Western weapons were used in Crimea, framing the attacks as terrorism.
  • Increased Focus on Diplomacy and Peace Negotiations: РБК-Україна reports that President Zelenskyy stated there are signals that after a ceasefire, Ukraine might be left "one on one" with the Russians, acknowledging the difficulty of negotiations and the potential for some countries, including the US, to step back after a ceasefire agreement, but also stating that Europe will remain involved. This highlights Ukrainian concerns about potential post-ceasefire diplomatic support. РБК-Україна reports on Zelenskyy's meeting with Trump in the Vatican, describing it as the "shortest, but most substantive," and that they discussed the minerals agreement, sanctions packages against Russia, and air defense systems, with Zelenskyy believing the one-on-one format worked well. This confirms high-level discussions on key issues. Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны and ASTRA report that Zelenskyy rejected Putin's proposal for a 3-day ceasefire for May 9th, with Zelenskyy stating Ukraine cannot guarantee the safety of world leaders in Moscow on that date. This explicitly rejects a Russian diplomatic overture and raises the possibility of continued military activity around a symbolic date. STERNENKO reiterates Zelenskyy's statement about not guaranteeing the safety of world leaders in Moscow on May 9th. РБК-Україна reports that Zelenskyy is ready for a ceasefire starting from May 7th, but for a duration of 30 days, stating the date is not important but the duration is. This presents a counter-proposal for a significantly longer ceasefire period. Оперативний ЗСУ reiterates Zelenskyy's statement about being ready for a 30-day ceasefire from May 7th. РБК-Україна reiterates Zelenskyy's position on not being responsible for what happens on the territory of the Russian Federation on May 9th and not providing guarantees to countries attending events in Moscow. Alex Parker Returns attributes Zelenskyy's rejection of the ceasefire and statement about not guaranteeing safety in Moscow to him being a "military dictator" and links it to Serbian President Vucic's sudden illness. Военкор Котенок also states that Zelenskyy rejected the 3-day ceasefire and threatened the safety of world leaders in Moscow on May 9th, interpreting this as a real threat and warning of a strong Russian response, including the potential use of "Oreshniks" (likely referring to advanced Russian weaponry) against Kyiv if Ukraine strikes the Victory Parade, and suggesting this action is a form of revenge for Western leaders not attending events in Kyiv on May 9th. This highlights Russian military bloggers' strong reaction and perceived threat from Zelenskyy's statements. ASTRA reports that Zelenskyy insists on a 30-day ceasefire after rejecting Putin's proposal. Яnus Putkonen interprets the US approach to conflicts as only starting and losing them, linking this to reports of new US sanctions against Russia.
  • Internal Russian Issues and Discipline Concerns: "Север.Реалии" reports a disturbing incident in Kursk Oblast where a Russian servicemember broke into a multi-child family's home and opened fire on the owners, killing the woman and severely injuring her husband, citing a conversation with fellow villagers. This highlights serious concerns about discipline, control, and potential criminal behavior among some Russian military personnel, particularly in border regions. БУТУСОВ ПЛЮС reports on the detention of a servicemember from occupied Luhansk (LNR) suspected of killing fellow servicemen by locking them in a cage ("chicken coop") and throwing a grenade inside after they refused to follow an order, framing it with the Russian propaganda slogan "Work, brothers!". This further underscores potential severe internal discipline issues, including insubordination and deadly violence within Russian or proxy military units. Басурин о главном criticizes a Belgian procurement of French armored vehicles, highlighting significant cost overruns and lack of risk analysis, framing it as a "massive failure" and questioning Belgium's position to lecture others. While not directly related to the front lines, this reflects on internal perceptions of Western military efficiency and potential corruption within defense procurement.
  • Propaganda and Information Operations: Alex Parker Returns shares video acknowledging the Ukrainian attack on Crimea and Novorossiysk and links it to upcoming documentary about 25 years of Putin's rule, with a sarcastic tone, also mentioning an oil spill, potentially hinting at other issues or failures. ТАСС reports that Medvedev called Trump's statement about the US making the main contribution to victory in WWII "pathetic nonsense," engaging in historical narrative contestation. ТАСС reports on the main goal of introducing behavior grades in Russian schools as strengthening conscious discipline and highlighting key criteria, indicating a focus on social control and instilling desired values among youth. Alex Parker Returns shares photos presented as showing Ukrainians undergoing rehabilitation in a psychiatric hospital after combat, with captions implying they are creating items with symbols (one appears to have a swastika), framing it as a master class in pottery, and accompanying it with a donation link, likely a crude and offensive information operation aimed at dehumanizing Ukrainian soldiers and associating them with Nazism, while also potentially collecting funds. Дневник Десантника reports that Ukrainian Armed Forces will participate in a parade in London on May 5th to commemorate the 80th anniversary of victory over Nazi Germany, framed within a narrative of Western support for Ukraine. Рыбарь reports on alleged efforts by British authorities to crack down on "charitable" organizations funding foreign armies, including Ukrainian societies that purchased DJI Mavic drones for the Ukrainian Armed Forces, suggesting this is a deliberate move to control funding for foreign military activities and potentially targeting specific groups, framing it as "Britons fighting against collections." This report from a Russian source indicates awareness of Western public support for Ukraine and potential efforts to counter it. ТАСС reports that a Russian Duma committee member believes the UK invited the Ukrainian Armed Forces to the Victory Day ceremony due to British interests in the Black Sea, framing the invitation within a narrative of geopolitical calculation rather than historical commemoration. Alex Parker Returns shares a photo with a caption contrasting exchanging Tokyo for Nizhny Novgorod with the question "What have you achieved?", potentially a commentary on personal success and choices, possibly related to emigration or joining the military. ASTRA reports on the announced reopening of the Mariupol Drama Theater by "DPR" authorities by the end of the year, highlighting the conflicting narratives surrounding the theater's destruction in 2022 and the disputed casualty figures, with Russian authorities claiming only 14 deaths while witnesses and experts estimate several hundred, framing the reopening as a sign of "restoration" while independent reports point to a deliberate Russian attack. This demonstrates the ongoing contestation of the narrative around the Mariupol tragedy. Генеральний штаб ЗСУ shares photos and a detailed account of a junior sergeant from the 503rd Separate Marine Battalion ("Strazh"), highlighting his combat experience, drone skills, effectiveness against enemy personnel and equipment (claiming over 250 enemies eliminated), participation in crossing the Dnipro, challenges of combat (lack of rotation, difficult conditions, injuries), and his return to service as an instructor, accompanied by patriotic slogans. This is a clear Ukrainian information operation aimed at showcasing military valor, effectiveness of drone operations, and resilience of soldiers, likely to boost morale and recruitment. Военкор Котенок shares a political analysis claiming that the threats from "overdue" Zelenskyy are real, interpreting his statements about not guaranteeing safety in Moscow as a direct threat to attack the Victory Parade and the Crimean Bridge, suggesting this is revenge for Western leaders not attending events in Kyiv on May 9th, and warning of a massive Russian response. This exemplifies the heightened information warfare around the upcoming May 9th events and the use of strong, accusatory language.
  • Ukrainian Military Adaptation and Effectiveness: The detailed account of the Ukrainian junior sergeant "Strazh" highlights the importance of individual soldier initiative, training (including on drones and Javelin), adaptation to combat conditions (crossing the Dnipro, fighting in Krynky), and the significant impact of drone operations on eliminating enemy personnel and equipment. His return to service as an instructor underscores the importance of knowledge transfer and adaptation within the Ukrainian forces. The unit identification (503rd Separate Marine Battalion) provides specificity regarding where these tactics and personnel are operating. Повітряні Сили ЗС України report enemy reconnaissance UAVs operating in southeastern Dnipropetrovsk and northeastern Kharkiv Oblasts, which could be spotters for enemy attacks, and state that measures are being taken to shoot them down, indicating ongoing Russian reconnaissance efforts and Ukrainian counter-drone activities.
  • Logistical and Resource Issues: The Russian military blogger report on the Belgian procurement scandal, while not directly on the front, reflects on the complexities and potential pitfalls of military procurement. Басурин о главном's report on the attack in Horlivka injuring emergency services personnel and damaging a headquarters vehicle highlights the impact of the conflict on essential support services and military infrastructure in occupied territories. Рыбарь's report on British authorities allegedly cracking down on funding for foreign armies, including Ukrainian societies, suggests potential challenges for Ukraine in securing external non-governmental funding for military equipment like drones.
  • Diplomatic and Political Messaging: Medvedev's response to Trump's WWII statement is part of a broader historical narrative contestation. The planned participation of Ukrainian Armed Forces in the London parade is a symbolic act of international support. Russian officials' interpretation of this invitation as being driven by British interests in the Black Sea reflects geopolitical suspicion. Zelenskyy's discussions with Trump on minerals, sanctions, and air defense highlight key areas of bilateral focus. His statements about potential isolation after a ceasefire and the difficulty of negotiations underscore the complex diplomatic landscape. Zelenskyy's rejection of the 3-day ceasefire and counter-proposal for a 30-day truce sets a different framework for potential de-escalation. His refusal to guarantee the safety of leaders in Moscow on May 9th and statements about Ukraine not being responsible for events in Russia on that date are significant diplomatic signals, potentially intended to deter attendance or highlight the ongoing conflict and risk. The Serbian President's sudden illness and canceled visit to the US, linked by some Russian sources to potential pressure to avoid the May 9th parade in Moscow, suggests the political complexities faced by countries balancing relations with Russia and the West.
  • Cybersecurity and Information Assurance: Russian reports about alleged Ukrainian threats to attack the Victory Parade and Crimean Bridge contribute to a narrative of Ukrainian terrorism and justify enhanced security measures. The information operation attempting to link Ukrainian soldiers to Nazism through distorted imagery is a form of information warfare aimed at influencing perceptions.
  • Humanitarian and Legal Aspects: The severe humanitarian impact of aerial attacks on civilians in Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia remains a critical concern. The report of a Russian servicemember killing and injuring civilians in Kursk Oblast raises serious legal and ethical issues and highlights potential internal problems within the Russian military. The report on the detention of a servicemember in the LNR for killing fellow soldiers after refusing orders also underscores potential war crimes and severe discipline failures. The conflicting narratives surrounding the destruction and reopening of the Mariupol Drama Theater illustrate the ongoing efforts to control the historical narrative and potential lack of accountability for alleged war crimes.

Potential Future Developments

  • Continued High-Intensity Ground Combat: Expect sustained intense fighting on the Pokrovsk, Lyman, and Novopavlivka axes. Localized Russian advances, particularly in areas mentioned by Russian sources like Bogatyr and the Mirnohradsk direction, are possible but will likely face strong Ukrainian resistance. Continued Russian aerial support and FPV drone use will remain significant factors in ground operations. Russian efforts on the Kupyansk, Lyman, and Siversk axes are likely to continue, but Ukrainian defenses appear to be holding in these areas based on recent reports.
  • Persistent and Potentially Escalated Russian Aerial Attacks: Russia is likely to continue large-scale drone and guided aerial bomb attacks across Ukraine, with a continued risk of high civilian casualties and damage to infrastructure, particularly in urban areas like Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia, and border regions like Sumy. The use of thermobaric warheads suggests a deliberate strategy to maximize destructive impact. Expect continued targeting of military and civilian infrastructure across various oblasts.
  • Continued and Evolving Ukrainian Deep Strikes: Ukraine is likely to continue large-scale combined unmanned and missile attacks on Crimea and Russian naval assets and infrastructure in the Black Sea and potentially other Russian territory. The claimed capability to engage air targets with naval drones, if confirmed, could represent a significant escalation and force changes in Russian air and naval tactics. Russian efforts to counter these attacks will continue, with both sides learning and adapting. The high number of claimed interceptions by Russia indicates their efforts to mitigate these strikes.
  • Increased Diplomatic Maneuvering and Uncertainties: The diplomatic landscape around potential peace negotiations remains fluid and complex. Zelenskyy's statements highlight potential challenges in maintaining international support after a ceasefire. Discussions with the US on key aid and resource agreements will continue to be crucial. The rejection of the 3-day ceasefire proposal by Ukraine and counter-proposal for a longer truce sets a different framework for potential de-escalation and indicates a lack of trust in short-term pauses. The political maneuvering and pressures around countries' attendance at the May 9th parade in Moscow reflect the ongoing geopolitical tensions and efforts to isolate or support Russia.
  • Highlighting of Internal Russian Issues and Potential Impact on Morale: Reports of severe discipline issues and potential criminal behavior among Russian military personnel, as seen in the Kursk and LNR incidents, could, if widespread, negatively impact Russian troop morale, cohesion, and public perception of the military. Continued reporting on these issues from both Russian and Ukrainian sources is probable.
  • Intensified Information Warfare: Both sides will likely intensify information operations, particularly around the symbolic date of May 9th and in response to significant military events or diplomatic developments. This includes contesting narratives around historical events (like WWII), showcasing military successes and valor (as seen in the Ukrainian profile of "Strazh"), highlighting alleged enemy weaknesses or failures (like discipline issues), and using propaganda to influence domestic and international opinion. The framing of Ukrainian deep strikes as "terrorism" by Russian sources is likely to continue.
  • Focus on Attrition and Resource Management: The high reported daily losses for Russia, coupled with ongoing intense combat and the need for military aid and resources on both sides, underscore the continued focus on attrition warfare and the importance of logistics and resource management. Discussions around military procurement issues, even in other countries, highlight the broader context of resource needs in modern conflict. The alleged crack down on fundraising for foreign armies in the UK could impact Ukrainian access to certain forms of support.
  • Ongoing Efforts in Military Adaptation and Training: The emphasis on drone operation skills and knowledge transfer, as highlighted in the Ukrainian profile of "Strazh," indicates continued adaptation and training efforts within the Ukrainian forces to leverage new technologies and combat lessons learned. Russian counter-drone efforts and the evolving nature of naval drone warfare also demonstrate adaptation on both sides.

Potential Indicators

  • Independent verification or refutation of claimed territorial changes and tactical gains on the Pokrovsk, Mirnohradsk, Southern Donetsk, Kurakhove, Bogatyr, Kupyansk, Lyman, and Siversk axes. Geolocation of claimed advances and losses will be crucial.
  • Further details, independent verification, or investigation reports regarding the impact of drone and missile attacks on Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, Sumy, and other areas, including updated casualty figures and damage assessments. Reports on the continued use of thermobaric warheads.
  • Further reports or visual evidence of Ukrainian drone, unmanned boat, and missile activity targeting Crimea, Novorossiysk, and other Russian territory, and Russian responses, including claimed interceptions, damage assessments, and changes in naval/air tactics in the Black Sea. Independent verification of the claimed hit on a Russian Su-30 by a naval drone.
  • Any official statements or significant developments in diplomatic efforts related to peace negotiations, including responses to Ukraine's 30-day ceasefire proposal and any concrete steps towards de-escalation or continued conflict. Any changes in the stated positions of the US or other international actors regarding their role in negotiations.
  • Further reports, investigations, or official responses regarding the incidents of alleged criminal behavior and discipline failures among Russian military personnel in Kursk Oblast and the LNR. Any observable impact on troop behavior or unit cohesion.
  • Increased or decreased intensity and nature of information operations from both sides, particularly around May 9th. New propaganda themes, significant media campaigns, or alleged false flag operations. The types of imagery and messaging used will be indicative.
  • Observable changes in the intensity, targeting, or types of Russian aerial attacks, particularly the use of guided aerial bombs and the routes and concentrations of drone activity. Reports on Ukrainian counter-drone efforts and their effectiveness.
  • Any observable impact of reported logistical challenges or changes in military procurement or funding, including the impact of potential restrictions on fundraising for foreign armies.
  • Further details or official statements regarding the political maneuvering and pressures around countries' attendance at the May 9th parade in Moscow.
  • Continued reporting on military adaptation and training efforts on both sides, including the integration of new technologies and tactics.
  • Updates on the humanitarian situation in affected areas, including the condition of the injured and the impact on civilian life and infrastructure. Further information or investigations into alleged war crimes and efforts to control the narrative around events like the Mariupol Drama Theater destruction.
  • Any observable shifts in military movements or unusual activity in border regions or within Russia in the lead-up to May 9th, potentially related to heightened security or planned military actions.
  • Further details on the effectiveness of Ukrainian efforts to counter Russian reconnaissance UAVs.
  • Public and official reaction to the proposed reopening of the Mariupol Drama Theater.

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on the provided information and should not be considered exhaustive or definitive. Real-time military intelligence is constantly evolving, and independent verification of all claims is crucial. All recommendations and actions based on this information must be filtered through human oversight and comply with international laws and ethical standards.

Previous (2025-05-03 08:48:49Z)

We only use optional analytics cookies if you allow them. Necessary cookies stay on for sign-in and site security.

Learn more in our Privacy Policy.